Security Zone; Calcasieu River and Ship Channel, LA, 18755-18757 [2010-8375]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
2. Amend § 20.31 to add paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
■
§ 20.31
Responsibilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The FBI may routinely establish
and collect fees for noncriminal justice
fingerprint-based and other
identification services as authorized by
Federal law. These fees apply to
Federal, State and any other authorized
entities requesting fingerprint
identification records and name checks
for noncriminal justice purposes.
(1) The Director of the FBI shall
review the amount of the fee
periodically, but not less than every four
years, to determine the current cost of
processing fingerprint identification
records and name checks for
noncriminal justice purposes.
(2) Fee amounts and any revisions
thereto shall be determined by current
costs, using a method of analysis
consistent with widely accepted
accounting principles and practices, and
calculated in accordance with the
provisions of 31 U.S.C. 9701 and other
Federal law as applicable.
(3) Fee amounts and any revisions
thereto shall be published as a notice in
the Federal Register.
[FR Doc. 2010–8385 Filed 4–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0317]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Calcasieu River and
Ship Channel, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
disestablishing the permanent safety
zone at Trunkline LNG in Lake Charles,
LA and replacing it with a security zone
with new boundaries. The Coast Guard
is also establishing two additional
permanent security zones on the waters
of the Calcasieu River for the mooring
basins at Cameron LNG in Hackberry,
LA and PPG Industries in Lake Charles,
LA. The Coast Guard is also
disestablishing the Calcasieu River ship
channel moving safety zone and
replacing it with a moving security
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Apr 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–0317 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2009–0317 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety
Unit Port Arthur, TX, telephone (409)
719–5086, or e-mail
scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Robert S. Mueller, III,
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
ACTION:
zone. The revised moving security zone
extends channel edge to channel edge
on the Calcasieu Channel and shoreline
to shoreline on the Calcasieu River, 2
miles ahead and 1 mile astern of certain
designated vessels while in transit on
the Calcasieu Channel or Calcasieu
River. Meeting, crossing or overtaking
situations are not permitted within the
security zone unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
The moving security zone may
commence at any point while certain
vessels are transiting the Calcasieu
Channel or Calcasieu River on U.S.
territorial waters (12 nautical miles) in
the Captain of the Port (COTP) Port
Arthur zone. These security zones are
needed to protect vessels, waterfront
facilities, the public, and other
surrounding areas from destruction,
loss, or injury caused by sabotage,
subversive acts, accidents, or other
actions of a similar nature. Unless
exempted under this rule, entry into or
movement within these security zones
is prohibited without permission from
the Captain of the Port or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective May 13,
2010.
Regulatory Information
On September 8, 2009, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Security Zone;
Calcasieu River and Ship Channel, LA’’
in the Federal Register (74 FR 46040).
We received 2 comments on the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18755
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
Heightened awareness of potential
terrorist acts requires enhanced security
of our ports, harbors, and vessels.
This rule establishes new, distinct
security zones on the waters of the
Calcasieu River. These zones will
protect waterfront facilities, persons,
and vessels from subversive or terrorist
acts. This rule also eliminates the
moving safety zone for non-gas free
LNGs transiting the Calcasieu Channel
and Calcasieu River and adds a distinct
moving security zone that may
commence at any point while certain
vessels are transiting the Calcasieu
Channel or Calcasieu River on U.S.
territorial waters in the Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur zone. Due to the
potential for terrorist attacks, this rule
allows the Captain of the Port to create
moving security zones around certain
vessels as deemed necessary, on a caseby-case basis. By limiting access to these
areas, the Coast Guard is reducing
potential methods of attack on these
vessels, and potential use of the vessels
to launch attacks on waterfront facilities
and adjacent population centers located
within the Captain of the Port zone.
Vessels having a need to enter these
security zones must obtain express
permission from the Captain of the Port,
Port Arthur or a designated
representative prior to entry.
These zones are in an area
concentrated with commercial facilities
considered critical to national security.
This rule does not restrict access to
vessels engaged, or assisting in
commerce with waterfront facilities
within fixed security zones, vessels
operated by port authorities, vessels
operated by waterfront facilities within
the fixed security zones, and vessels
operated by federal, state, county or
municipal agencies. By limiting access
to these areas the Coast Guard is
reducing potential methods of attack on
vessels, waterfront facilities, and
adjacent population centers located
within the zones. Vessels not exempted
under the provisions of this regulation
and desiring to enter these zones are
required to obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port, Port Arthur or a
designated representative prior to entry.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received two
comments concerning the NPRM. One
commenter recommended that the
boundaries of the proposed security
zone at PPG Industries (PPG) be
extended to include the transfer dock
located at the southern end of PPG
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
18756
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
properties and all shoreline. The Coast
Guard concurs in part with this
comment and is modifying the security
zone to include the southern-most
transfer dock, but will minimize the
impact on mariners by having the
security zone encompass waters within
100 feet of the shoreline between the
originally proposed security zone and
the southern transfer dock area.
Another commenter recommended
adding language specifying the agency
responsible for enforcement of this
security zone. The Coast Guard is the
agency responsible for enforcement of
this security zone. The proposed
language expressly states that
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Port Arthur must be obtained to enter
the security zone and future memoranda
of agreements may allow state or local
agencies to assist the Coast Guard in
enforcing this security zone.
The Coast Guard is making a change
to the language of the NPRM to provide
the public with a visual cue that the
moving safety zone is in effect.
Specifically, the final rule states that
‘‘Coast Guard patrol assets will be on
scene with flashing blue lights
energized when the moving security
zones are in effect.’’
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
The basis of this finding is that the fixed
security zones are not part of the
navigable waterway or a commercial
fishing ground and do not impede
commercial traffic on the Calcasieu
Waterway. The moving security zone is
limited in nature and will not create
undue delay to vessel traffic in or
around the Calcasieu River and Ship
Channel.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Apr 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: (1) The rules for
fixed security zones do not interfere
with regular vessel traffic within the
Calcasieu Ship Channel, Calcasieu River
or the Intracoastal Waterway; (2) the
rule for moving security zones are of
limited duration and vessels may be
allowed to pass through the zone with
the permission of the Captain of the Port
or his representative.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Assistance for Small Entities
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves security of certain vessels and
facilities and is not expected to result in
any significant adverse environmental
impact as described in NEPA.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
■
2. Revise § 165.805 to read as follows:
§ 165.805 Security Zones; Calcasieu River
and Ship Channel, Louisiana.
(a) Location. (1) The following areas
are designated as fixed security zones
(all coordinates are based upon North
American Datum of 1983 [NAD 83]):
(i) Trunkline LNG basin. All waters
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points, beginning at 30°06′36″
N, 93°17′36″ W, south to a point
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:59 Apr 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
30°06′33″ N, 93°17′36″ W, east to a point
30°06′30″ N, 93°17′02″ W, north to a
point 30°06′33″ N, 93°17′01″ W, then
tracing the shoreline along the water’s
edge to the point of origin.
(ii) Cameron LNG basin. All waters
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points, beginning at 30°02′33″
N, 093°19′53″ W, east to a point at
30°02′34″ N, 093°19′50″ W, south to a
point at 30°02′10″ N, 093°19′52″ W and
west to a point at 30°02′10″ N, 93°19′59″
W, then tracing the shoreline along the
water’s edge to the point of origin.
(iii) PPG Industries basin. All waters
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points: Beginning at 30°13′29″
N, 93°16′34″ W, southwest to a point at
30°13′11″ N, 93°16′51″ W, then
proceeding southerly following 100 feet
off the shoreline to a point at
30°12′57.2″ N, 93°16′53.2″ W, then east
to a point at 30°12′57.2″ N, 93°16′50.6″
W then southerly to a point at
30°12′47.7″ N, 93°16′50.3″ W then west
to the shoreline and then following
along the water’s edge to the point of
origin.
(2) The following areas are moving
security zones: All waters within the
Captain of the Port, Port Arthur zone
commencing at U.S. territorial waters
and extending channel edge to channel
edge on the Calcasieu Channel and
shoreline to shoreline on the Calcasieu
River, 2 miles ahead and 1 mile astern
of certain designated vessels while in
transit. Meeting, crossing or overtaking
situations are not permitted within the
security zone unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
Coast Guard patrol assets will be on
scene with flashing blue lights
energized when the moving security
zones are in effect.
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or
remaining in a fixed zone described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section is
prohibited for all vessels except:
(i) Commercial vessels operating at
waterfront facilities within these zones;
(ii) Commercial vessels transiting
directly to or from waterfront facilities
within these zones;
(iii) Vessels providing direct
operational or logistical support to
commercial vessels within these zones;
(iv) Vessels operated by the
appropriate port authority or by
facilities located within these zones;
and
(v) Vessels operated by federal, state,
county, or municipal agencies.
(2) Entry into or remaining in moving
zones described in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section is prohibited for all vessels
except:
(i) Moored vessels or vessels anchored
in a designated anchorage area. A
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18757
moored or an anchored vessel in a
security zone described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section must remain
moored or anchored unless it obtains
permission from the Captain of the Port
to do otherwise;
(ii) Commercial vessels operating at
waterfront facilities located within the
zone;
(iii) Vessels providing direct
operational support to commercial
vessels within a moving security zone;
(iv) Vessels operated by federal, state,
county, or municipal agencies.
(3) Other persons or vessels requiring
entry into security zones described in
this section must request permission
from the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur
or designated representatives.
(4) To request permission as required
by these regulations, contact Marine
Safety Unit Lake Charles at (337) 491–
7800 or the on scene patrol vessel.
(5) All persons and vessels within a
security zone described in this section
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur,
designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard
patrol personnel or other designated
representatives. On-scene U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Designated representatives include
federal, state, local and municipal law
enforcement agencies.
(c) Informational Broadcasts: The
Captain of the Port, Port Arthur will
inform the public when moving security
zones have been established around
vessels via Broadcast Notices to
Mariners and written notice provided by
escort vessels.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
J.J. Plunkett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2010–8375 Filed 4–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9910–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0118; FRL–9124–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Alternate Monitoring Requirements for
Indianapolis Power and Light—Harding
Street Station
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: Indiana requested on
December 31, 2008, that EPA approve as
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18755-18757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-8375]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0317]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Calcasieu River and Ship Channel, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is disestablishing the permanent safety zone
at Trunkline LNG in Lake Charles, LA and replacing it with a security
zone with new boundaries. The Coast Guard is also establishing two
additional permanent security zones on the waters of the Calcasieu
River for the mooring basins at Cameron LNG in Hackberry, LA and PPG
Industries in Lake Charles, LA. The Coast Guard is also disestablishing
the Calcasieu River ship channel moving safety zone and replacing it
with a moving security zone. The revised moving security zone extends
channel edge to channel edge on the Calcasieu Channel and shoreline to
shoreline on the Calcasieu River, 2 miles ahead and 1 mile astern of
certain designated vessels while in transit on the Calcasieu Channel or
Calcasieu River. Meeting, crossing or overtaking situations are not
permitted within the security zone unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port. The moving security zone may commence at any
point while certain vessels are transiting the Calcasieu Channel or
Calcasieu River on U.S. territorial waters (12 nautical miles) in the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Port Arthur zone. These security zones are
needed to protect vessels, waterfront facilities, the public, and other
surrounding areas from destruction, loss, or injury caused by sabotage,
subversive acts, accidents, or other actions of a similar nature.
Unless exempted under this rule, entry into or movement within these
security zones is prohibited without permission from the Captain of the
Port or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective May 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2009-0317 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2009-0317 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur, TX,
telephone (409) 719-5086, or e-mail scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 8, 2009, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Security Zone; Calcasieu River and Ship Channel, LA''
in the Federal Register (74 FR 46040). We received 2 comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
Heightened awareness of potential terrorist acts requires enhanced
security of our ports, harbors, and vessels.
This rule establishes new, distinct security zones on the waters of
the Calcasieu River. These zones will protect waterfront facilities,
persons, and vessels from subversive or terrorist acts. This rule also
eliminates the moving safety zone for non-gas free LNGs transiting the
Calcasieu Channel and Calcasieu River and adds a distinct moving
security zone that may commence at any point while certain vessels are
transiting the Calcasieu Channel or Calcasieu River on U.S. territorial
waters in the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur zone. Due to the
potential for terrorist attacks, this rule allows the Captain of the
Port to create moving security zones around certain vessels as deemed
necessary, on a case-by-case basis. By limiting access to these areas,
the Coast Guard is reducing potential methods of attack on these
vessels, and potential use of the vessels to launch attacks on
waterfront facilities and adjacent population centers located within
the Captain of the Port zone. Vessels having a need to enter these
security zones must obtain express permission from the Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur or a designated representative prior to entry.
These zones are in an area concentrated with commercial facilities
considered critical to national security. This rule does not restrict
access to vessels engaged, or assisting in commerce with waterfront
facilities within fixed security zones, vessels operated by port
authorities, vessels operated by waterfront facilities within the fixed
security zones, and vessels operated by federal, state, county or
municipal agencies. By limiting access to these areas the Coast Guard
is reducing potential methods of attack on vessels, waterfront
facilities, and adjacent population centers located within the zones.
Vessels not exempted under the provisions of this regulation and
desiring to enter these zones are required to obtain permission from
the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur or a designated representative
prior to entry.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received two comments concerning the NPRM. One
commenter recommended that the boundaries of the proposed security zone
at PPG Industries (PPG) be extended to include the transfer dock
located at the southern end of PPG
[[Page 18756]]
properties and all shoreline. The Coast Guard concurs in part with this
comment and is modifying the security zone to include the southern-most
transfer dock, but will minimize the impact on mariners by having the
security zone encompass waters within 100 feet of the shoreline between
the originally proposed security zone and the southern transfer dock
area.
Another commenter recommended adding language specifying the agency
responsible for enforcement of this security zone. The Coast Guard is
the agency responsible for enforcement of this security zone. The
proposed language expressly states that permission of the Captain of
the Port, Port Arthur must be obtained to enter the security zone and
future memoranda of agreements may allow state or local agencies to
assist the Coast Guard in enforcing this security zone.
The Coast Guard is making a change to the language of the NPRM to
provide the public with a visual cue that the moving safety zone is in
effect. Specifically, the final rule states that ``Coast Guard patrol
assets will be on scene with flashing blue lights energized when the
moving security zones are in effect.''
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. The basis of this finding is
that the fixed security zones are not part of the navigable waterway or
a commercial fishing ground and do not impede commercial traffic on the
Calcasieu Waterway. The moving security zone is limited in nature and
will not create undue delay to vessel traffic in or around the
Calcasieu River and Ship Channel.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: (1) The rules for fixed security
zones do not interfere with regular vessel traffic within the Calcasieu
Ship Channel, Calcasieu River or the Intracoastal Waterway; (2) the
rule for moving security zones are of limited duration and vessels may
be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the Captain
of the Port or his representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are
[[Page 18757]]
technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves security of certain
vessels and facilities and is not expected to result in any significant
adverse environmental impact as described in NEPA.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.805 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.805 Security Zones; Calcasieu River and Ship Channel,
Louisiana.
(a) Location. (1) The following areas are designated as fixed
security zones (all coordinates are based upon North American Datum of
1983 [NAD 83]):
(i) Trunkline LNG basin. All waters encompassed by a line
connecting the following points, beginning at 30[deg]06'36'' N,
93[deg]17'36'' W, south to a point 30[deg]06'33'' N, 93[deg]17'36'' W,
east to a point 30[deg]06'30'' N, 93[deg]17'02'' W, north to a point
30[deg]06'33'' N, 93[deg]17'01'' W, then tracing the shoreline along
the water's edge to the point of origin.
(ii) Cameron LNG basin. All waters encompassed by a line connecting
the following points, beginning at 30[deg]02'33'' N, 093[deg]19'53'' W,
east to a point at 30[deg]02'34'' N, 093[deg]19'50'' W, south to a
point at 30[deg]02'10'' N, 093[deg]19'52'' W and west to a point at
30[deg]02'10'' N, 93[deg]19'59'' W, then tracing the shoreline along
the water's edge to the point of origin.
(iii) PPG Industries basin. All waters encompassed by a line
connecting the following points: Beginning at 30[deg]13'29'' N,
93[deg]16'34'' W, southwest to a point at 30[deg]13'11'' N,
93[deg]16'51'' W, then proceeding southerly following 100 feet off the
shoreline to a point at 30[deg]12'57.2'' N, 93[deg]16'53.2'' W, then
east to a point at 30[deg]12'57.2'' N, 93[deg]16'50.6'' W then
southerly to a point at 30[deg]12'47.7'' N, 93[deg]16'50.3'' W then
west to the shoreline and then following along the water's edge to the
point of origin.
(2) The following areas are moving security zones: All waters
within the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur zone commencing at U.S.
territorial waters and extending channel edge to channel edge on the
Calcasieu Channel and shoreline to shoreline on the Calcasieu River, 2
miles ahead and 1 mile astern of certain designated vessels while in
transit. Meeting, crossing or overtaking situations are not permitted
within the security zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port. Coast Guard patrol assets will be on scene with flashing
blue lights energized when the moving security zones are in effect.
(b) Regulations. (1) Entry into or remaining in a fixed zone
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is prohibited for all
vessels except:
(i) Commercial vessels operating at waterfront facilities within
these zones;
(ii) Commercial vessels transiting directly to or from waterfront
facilities within these zones;
(iii) Vessels providing direct operational or logistical support to
commercial vessels within these zones;
(iv) Vessels operated by the appropriate port authority or by
facilities located within these zones; and
(v) Vessels operated by federal, state, county, or municipal
agencies.
(2) Entry into or remaining in moving zones described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section is prohibited for all vessels except:
(i) Moored vessels or vessels anchored in a designated anchorage
area. A moored or an anchored vessel in a security zone described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section must remain moored or anchored unless
it obtains permission from the Captain of the Port to do otherwise;
(ii) Commercial vessels operating at waterfront facilities located
within the zone;
(iii) Vessels providing direct operational support to commercial
vessels within a moving security zone;
(iv) Vessels operated by federal, state, county, or municipal
agencies.
(3) Other persons or vessels requiring entry into security zones
described in this section must request permission from the Captain of
the Port, Port Arthur or designated representatives.
(4) To request permission as required by these regulations, contact
Marine Safety Unit Lake Charles at (337) 491-7800 or the on scene
patrol vessel.
(5) All persons and vessels within a security zone described in
this section must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port, Port Arthur, designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel or other designated representatives. On-scene U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Designated representatives include
federal, state, local and municipal law enforcement agencies.
(c) Informational Broadcasts: The Captain of the Port, Port Arthur
will inform the public when moving security zones have been established
around vessels via Broadcast Notices to Mariners and written notice
provided by escort vessels.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
J.J. Plunkett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2010-8375 Filed 4-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9910-04-P