Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases, 18455-18468 [2010-6765]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 98
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0925; FRL–9130–6]
RIN 2060–AQ02
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse
Gases
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule amendment.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to amend
the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
Reporting Rule, to require reporters
subject to the rule to provide: The name,
address, and ownership status of their
U.S. parent company; their primary and
all other applicable North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code(s); and an indication of whether or
not any of their reported emissions are
from a cogeneration unit. The
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule requires
greenhouse gas emitting facilities and
suppliers of fuels and industrial gases
from all sectors of the economy to report
their greenhouse gas emissions and to
provide certain additional supporting
data in annual reports submitted to
EPA.
DATES: Comments. Comments must be
received on or before June 11, 2010.
Public Hearing. EPA does not plan to
conduct a public hearing unless
requested. To request a hearing, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by April 19, 2010. If requested, the
public hearing will be conducted on or
about April 19, 2010 in the Washington,
DC area. EPA will provide further
information about the hearing on its
webpage if a hearing is requested.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2009–0925, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRule amendment making
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
• E-mail:
GHGReportingCPNAICS@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–1741.
• Mail: Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
Mailcode 2822T, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0925, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand/Courier Delivery: EPA Docket
Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004,
Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2009–0925. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–
0925, GHG Reporting Corporate Parent
and NAICS Code. EPA’s policy is that
all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
18455
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. This Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carole Cook, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC–
6207J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 343–9263; fax number:
(202) 343–2342; e-mail address:
GHGMRR@epa.gov.
Additional
Information on Submitting Comments:
To expedite review of your comments
by Agency staff, you are encouraged to
send a separate copy of your comments,
in addition to the copy you submit to
the official docket, to Carole Cook, U.S.
EPA, Office of Atmospheric Programs,
Climate Change Division, Mail Code
6207–J, Washington, DC 20460,
telephone (202) 343–9263, e-mail
GHGReportingCPNAICS@epa.gov.
Regulated Entities. This proposed
amendment to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule would affect facilities
that are direct emitters of GHGs, and
suppliers of fuels and industrial gases,
that are already subject to the rule.
Regulated categories and entities would
include those listed in Table 1 of this
preamble:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1—EXAMPLES OF REGULATED ENTITIES BY CATEGORY
Category
NAICS code
Examples of regulated entities
General Stationary Fuel Combustion Sources ..........................
..........................
Facilities operating boilers, process heaters, incinerators, turbines, and internal combustion engines:
Extractors of crude petroleum and natural gas.
Manufacturers of lumber and wood products.
Pulp and paper mills.
Chemical manufacturers.
Petroleum refineries and manufacturers of coal products.
Manufacturers of rubber and miscellaneous plastic products.
211
321
322
325
324
316, 326, 339
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18456
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—EXAMPLES OF REGULATED ENTITIES BY CATEGORY—Continued
Category
NAICS code
331
332
336
221
622
611
221112
Electricity Generation .................................................................
Adipic Acid Production ...............................................................
Aluminum Production .................................................................
Ammonia Manufacturing ............................................................
Cement Production ....................................................................
Ferroalloy Production .................................................................
Glass Production ........................................................................
325199
331312
325311
327310
331112
327211
327213
327212
HCFC–22 Production and HFC–23 Destruction ........................
Hydrogen Production .................................................................
Iron and Steel Production ..........................................................
325120
325120
331111
Lead Production .........................................................................
331419
331492
327410
Lime Production .........................................................................
Nitric Acid Production ................................................................
Petrochemical Production ..........................................................
325311
32511
325199
325110
325182
324110
325312
322110
322121
322130
327910
325181
212391
325188
331419
331492
Petroleum Refineries .................................................................
Phosphoric Acid Production .......................................................
Pulp and Paper Manufacturing ..................................................
Silicon Carbide Production ........................................................
Soda Ash Manufacturing ...........................................................
Titanium Dioxide Production ......................................................
Zinc Production ..........................................................................
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills .................................................
562212
221320
112111
112120
112210
112310
112330
112320
211111
324110
221210
211112
325120
325120
Manure1 Management ...............................................................
Suppliers of Coal Based Liquids Fuels .....................................
Suppliers of Petroleum Products ...............................................
Suppliers of Natural Gas and NGLs ..........................................
Suppliers of Industrial GHGs .....................................................
Suppliers of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) ...........................................
Examples of regulated entities
Steel works, blast furnaces.
Electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring.
Manufacturers of motor vehicle parts and accessories.
Electric, gas, and sanitary services.
Health services.
Educational services.
Fossil-fuel fired electric generating units, including units
owned by Federal and municipal governments and units located in Indian Country.
Adipic acid manufacturing facilities.
Primary Aluminum production facilities.
Anhydrous and aqueous ammonia manufacturing facilities.
Portland Cement manufacturing plants.
Ferroalloys manufacturing facilities.
Flat glass manufacturing facilities.
Glass container manufacturing facilities.
Other pressed and blown glass and glassware manufacturing
facilities.
Chlorodifluoromethane manufacturing facilities.
Hydrogen manufacturing facilities.
Integrated iron and steel mills, steel companies, sinter plants,
blast furnaces, basic oxygen process furnace shops.
Primary lead smelting and refining facilities.
Secondary lead smelting and refining facilities.
Calcium oxide, calcium hydroxide, dolomitic hydrates manufacturing facilities.
Nitric acid manufacturing facilities.
Ethylene dichloride manufacturing facilities.
Acrylonitrile, ethylene oxide, methanol manufacturing facilities.
Ethylene manufacturing facilities.
Carbon black manufacturing facilities.
Petroleum refineries.
Phosphoric acid manufacturing facilities.
Pulp mills.
Paper mills.
Paperboard mills.
Silicon carbide abrasives manufacturing facilities.
Alkalies and chlorine manufacturing facilities.
Soda ash, natural, mining and/or beneficiation.
Titanium dioxide manufacturing facilities.
Primary zinc refining facilities.
Zinc dust reclaiming facilities, recovering from scrap and/or
alloying purchased metals.
Solid waste landfills.
Sewage treatment facilities.
Beef cattle feedlots.
Dairy cattle and milk production facilities.
Hog and pig farms.
Chicken egg production facilities.
Turkey Production.
Broilers and Other Meat type Chicken Production.
Coal liquefaction at mine sites.
Petroleum refineries.
Natural gas distribution facilities.
Natural gas liquid extraction facilities.
Industrial gas manufacturing facilities.
Industrial gas manufacturing facilities.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
1 EPA is not implementing subpart JJ of the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule due to a Congressional restriction prohibiting the expenditure of
funds for this purpose.
Table 1 of this preamble is not
intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding
entities likely to be regulated by this
action. Table 1 lists the types of entities
that EPA currently is aware of that
could be potentially affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
in the table could also be subject to
reporting requirements. To determine
whether an entity is affected by this
action, you should carefully examine
the applicability criteria found in 40
CFR part 98, subpart A. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the person listed in the preceding FOR
section.
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The
following acronyms and abbreviations
are used in this document.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFC chlorofluorocarbon
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e CO2-equivalent
CUSIP Committee on Uniform Security
Identification Procedures
DUNS Data Universal Numbering System
eGRID Generation Resource Integrated
Database
EO Executive Order
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FEIN Federal Employee Identification
Numbers
GHG greenhouse gas
HCFC hydrochlorofluorocarbon
HFC hydrofluorocarbon
HFE hydrofluoroether
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information
System
ICR Information Collection Request
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System
NIH National Institutes of Health
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RCRAInfo Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act database
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RGGI Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
SBREFA Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SIC Standard Industrial Classification
TCR The Climate Registry
TRI Toxics Release Inventory
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
U.S. United States
WCI Western Climate Initiative
WRI World Resources Institute
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Background on Proposed Rule
Amendment
B. Summary of the Proposed Rule
Amendment
C. Legal Authority
D. Relationship to Other Programs
1. EPA and Other Federal Data Collection
Programs
2. Non-Federal Data Collection Programs
II. Proposed Rule Amendment and Rationale
A. U.S. Parent Company
B. NAICS Code
C. Cogeneration
D. Frequency of Reporting
E. Applicability
F. Request for Comment
III. Economic Impacts of the Proposed Rule
Amendment
A. How were compliance costs estimated?
B. What are the costs of the rule?
C. What are the economic impacts of the
rule?
D. What are the impacts of the rule on
small businesses?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. Background
A. Background on Proposed Rule
Amendment
The Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule,
published on October 30, 2009 (74 FR
56260), requires reporting by facilities
that emit GHGs (‘‘facilities’’) and by
suppliers of fuels and industrial gases
(‘‘suppliers’’). Facilities and suppliers
that meet the applicability criteria in
subpart A of 40 CFR part 98 (‘‘regulated
entities’’ or ‘‘reporters’’) must submit
annual GHG reports.2 A list of the
information that all reporters must
submit in their annual reports is
included in the general provisions of the
rule (see 40 CFR 98.3(c)). This list
includes owner/operator identification
information, but does not currently
require reporters to provide information
on their U.S. parent company, on their
primary and other applicable NAICS
code(s), or on whether any of their
reported emissions are from a
cogeneration unit. In this notice, EPA
proposes amendments to the Mandatory
GHG Reporting Rule that would require
facilities and suppliers subject to the
rule to provide this additional
information in their annual reports.
This preamble is divided into four
sections. The first section of the
preamble provides background and an
overview of the proposed rule
amendment, discusses EPA’s legal
authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for collecting the proposed additional
information and describes the
relationship between this information
and the information already collected by
other Federal, regional, and State
reporting programs. The second section
of the preamble states the proposed rule
requirements and summarizes the
rationale for requiring facilities and
suppliers subject to the rule to report
this additional information on an
annual basis. This section also includes
a summary of issues associated with the
proposed rule amendment upon which
EPA is particularly interested in
2 Because they are not covered under 40 CFR part
98, this rule does not apply to mobile sources.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18457
receiving comment. The third section of
the preamble provides a summary of the
impacts and costs of the proposed rule
amendment. The fourth and final
section of the preamble discusses the
various statutory and executive order
requirements applicable to the proposed
rule amendment.
B. Summary of the Proposed Rule
Amendment
EPA is proposing to add three data
elements to the list of data elements
specified in 40 CFR 98.3. These data
elements would be included in the
annual GHG reports that facilities and
suppliers subject to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule are required to submit.
Specifically, this proposed rule
amendment would require each reporter
to (1) provide the legal name and
physical address of its highest-level U.S.
parent company and to indicate its
ownership status by selecting from a list
of codes provided by EPA; 3 (2) provide
its primary and other applicable North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code(s); and (3)
indicate whether any of its reported
emissions are from a cogeneration unit.
This proposed rule amendment
applies to all facilities and suppliers
required to report under 40 CFR part 98,
published on October 30, 2009 (74 FR
56260).4 Therefore, all facilities and
suppliers that meet the applicability
criteria in 40 CFR part 98, subpart A
would be required to report the
additional data elements included in
this proposal.5
C. Legal Authority
EPA is proposing this rule
amendment under the existing authority
provided in CAA section 114. As noted
in the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule,
CAA section 114 provides EPA with
broad authority to require the
information mandated by this proposed
rule amendment because such
information will inform EPA’s
implementation of various CAA
provisions (74 FR 66264). Under CAA
section 114(a)(1), the Administrator may
require emission sources, persons
subject to the CAA, manufacturers of
emission control or process equipment,
3 This information would not be required if, upon
finalization of this rule amendment, EPA decides to
require reporters to list all of their U.S. parent
companies and their respective percentages of
ownership.
4 If additional categories are proposed and
finalized in 40 CFR part 98, then this rule
amendment would apply to those categories as
well.
5 EPA is not implementing subpart JJ of the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule due to a
Congressional restriction prohibiting the
expenditure of funds for this purpose.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18458
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
or persons whom the Administrator
believes may have necessary
information, to monitor and report
emissions and to provide such other
information as the Administrator
requests for the purposes of carrying out
any provision of the CAA (except for a
provision of title II with respect to
motor vehicles).
As discussed in greater detail in the
response to comments for the final
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, EPA
may gather information for a variety of
purposes, including for the purpose of
assisting in the development of
emissions standards under CAA section
111, determining compliance with
implementation plans or standards, or
more broadly for ‘‘carrying out any
provision’’ of the CAA. Section 103 of
the CAA authorizes EPA to establish a
national research and development
program, including nonregulatory
approaches and technologies, for the
prevention and control of air pollution,
including greenhouse gases. The data
collected under this proposed rule
amendment could inform EPA’s
implementation of section 103(g) of the
CAA regarding improvements in sector
based nonregulatory strategies and
technologies for preventing or reducing
air pollutants.
In addition, corporate parent and
NAICS code data could assist EPA in
developing and improving air pollution
emission inventories. A more detailed
understanding of the sources and
operational categories of GHG emissions
could lead to improvements in air
pollution emissions information that is
relied upon to develop effective control
methods. The additional information
may also inform regulatory strategies
being evaluated by EPA.
Given the broad scope of CAA section
114, it is appropriate for EPA to gather
the information required by this
proposed rule amendment because such
information is relevant to EPA’s
carrying out a wide variety of CAA
provisions.
D. Relationship to Other Programs
This section of the preamble discusses
other Federal and non-Federal reporting
programs that collect information
similar to the information that EPA
would collect under this proposed rule
amendment. Although considerable
information on GHG emitting industrial
facilities and on suppliers of fuel and
industrial gas is already collected by
EPA, other Federal and State agencies,
and private and nonprofit organizations,
no other source of information meets all
of the objectives that EPA has set out for
this proposed rulemaking. Specifically,
no other reporting program meets all of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
the following criteria: Identifies each
reporter’s highest-level U.S. parent
company; identifies each reporter’s
primary and all other applicable NAICS
codes; includes information on
cogeneration; covers all reporters to the
Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting
Rule; is collected annually; and is
available to EPA.
This section of the preamble reviews
the data collected under other reporting
programs and compares those data with
the data that would be collected under
this proposed rule amendment. Section
II of the preamble (Proposed Rule
Amendment and Rationale) compares
the specific definitions that EPA is
proposing to use for U.S. parent
company, NAICS code, and
cogeneration unit, for purposes of this
rule amendment, with the definitions
used by other Federal and non-Federal
programs, and explains why we have
selected the particular definitions that
are used here.
1. EPA and Other Federal Data
Collection Programs U.S. Parent
Company
Currently, three EPA programs collect
parent company information: The
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) under
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act;
Risk Management Plans under Section
212(r) of the Clean Air Act; and the
Inventory Update Rule under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). Of
these three programs, TRI is the only
one that requires reporters to submit
information on their highest-level U.S.
parent company.6 TRI requires the
parent’s name and Dun & Bradstreet
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) 7
identifier to be reported annually. EPA
estimates that approximately two-thirds
of the reporters to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule are also required to
report to TRI.
Risk Management Plans under CAA
section 212(r) are required to include
information on ‘‘parent company.’’ 8
6 For purposes of TRI Form R, a reporter’s parent
company is defined as the highest-level company,
located in the United States that directly owns at
least 50 percent of the voting stock of the company
(Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Forms
and Instructions, EPA 260–R–09–006, October
2009, page 34).
7 The Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
is a unique 9-digit numerical identifier used to
identify individual business entities in databases
maintained by Dun & Bradstreet.
8 EPA’s guidance for Risk Management Plans
states ‘‘Your parent company is the corporation or
other business entity that owns at least 50 percent
of the voting stock of your company. If you are
owned by a joint venture, enter the first of your two
major owners here. If your company does not have
a parent company, leave this data element blank.’’
Risk Management Plan Guidance, https://
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
However, the parent company reported
in a Risk Management Plan is not
necessarily the highest-level U.S. parent
company. Risk Management Plans are
generally submitted only once every five
years, but must be updated when a
chemical accident occurs at a facility.
The Inventory Update Rule under TSCA
requires reporting of both the
production facility where a specific
chemical is produced and the corporate
unit responsible for the production or
importation of the chemical. However,
reporters are not required to identify the
highest-level U.S. parent company and
the program does not define ‘‘company.’’
Several EPA programs under the
CAA, including the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule, require reporters to
identify the ‘‘owner or operator’’ of each
affected facility. In these programs,
‘‘owner’’ 9 refers to the person or legal
entity that owns the facility and its
productive infrastructure. ‘‘Operator’’ 10
refers to the legal entity that controls
day-to-day operations. Under some
regulatory and reporting programs,
‘‘operator’’ refers specifically to the plant
or site manager. Although in some
cases, the owner or operator is also the
highest-level U.S. parent company, the
information currently collected under
the majority of CAA programs is not
designed to specifically identify the
highest-level U.S. parent company or to
provide insight into the corporate
ownership structure because that
information is not necessary to
determine compliance with particular
regulatory requirements. EPA does
generate information on the highestlevel U.S. parent company of electric
generating facilities in its Emissions and
Generation Resource Integrated
Database (eGRID). However, these
parent company data are based on
ownership information reported to the
Energy Information Administration of
the U.S. Department of Energy, and on
internal EPA research. eGRID contains
U.S. parent company data for
approximately 5,000 electric generating
facilities, of which approximately 2,000
www.epa.gov/emergencies/docs/chem/
RMPeSubmit_users_manual.pdf#page=33.
9 Under 40 CFR 98.6, ‘‘owner’’ means any person
who has a legal or equitable title to, has a leasehold
interest in, or control of a facility or supplier,
except a person whose legal or equitable title to or
leasehold interest in the facility or supplier arises
solely because the person is a limited partner in a
partnership that has legal or equitable title to, has
a leasehold interest in, or control of the facility or
supplier shall not be considered an ‘‘owner’’ of the
facility or supplier.
10 Under 40 CFR 98.6, ‘‘Operator’’ means any
person who operates or supervises a facility or
supplier.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
are projected to be subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.11
Primary and Other NAICS Codes
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
In addition to collecting information
on reporters’ U.S. parent companies,
this proposed rule amendment would
require facilities and suppliers reporting
under the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule to report their primary and other
applicable NAICS codes.12 This
information is useful for benchmarking
the environmental performance of
companies and facilities relative to
others in their sector. Among all EPA
programs, only TRI requires reporters to
submit primary NAICS codes as well as
other relevant NAICS codes. As noted
above, EPA estimates that
approximately two-thirds of the
reporters under the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule are also required to
report to TRI.
EPA does collect NAICS code
information through routine compliance
reporting in multiple programs, but
those data are not complete. The air
compliance data contained in the Air
Facilities System and the water
compliance data contained in the Permit
Compliance System both include
primary NAICS codes, but not other
relevant NAICS codes. Conversely, the
compliance data for hazardous waste
management contained in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act database
(RCRAInfo) include multiple NAICS
codes for facilities with more than one
relevant code, but do not identify the
primary NAICS code. The Integrated
Compliance Information System (ICIS),
which houses a variety of enforcement
records, also includes NAICS codes, but
does not explain how these codes are
derived. In addition, none of the
compliance databases provide complete
coverage of the facilities subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.
11 Of the approximately 3,000 electric generating
facilities that are not projected to be subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, about half do not
combust any fossil fuel (e.g., they utilize hydro,
nuclear, wind or solar power) and the other half
emit or are expected to emit less than 25,000 metric
tons of CO2e per year. The approximately 2,000
electric generating facilities that are projected to be
subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule
account for 99.7% of the total GHG emissions from
all electric generators.
12 A reporter’s primary North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) code is defined as
the six-digit NAICS code that represents the
reporter’s primary product/activity/service as
defined in ‘‘North American Industrial
Classification System Manual 2007,’’ available from
the U.S. Department of Commerce, National
Technical Information Service. All other NAICS
codes relating to product(s)/activity(s)/service(s)
which provide economic profit (but which are not
related to the principal source of revenue) are
additional NAICS codes.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Cogeneration
There are currently no EPA programs
that require facilities or suppliers to
report the use of cogeneration units.
EPA’s Combined Heat and Power
Partnership, a voluntary program
created in 2001, requires that Partners
complete a Letter of Intent stating that
they agree to provide data on existing
combined heat and power (also known
as cogeneration) projects and on new
project development to help EPA
determine climate benefits.13 However,
this is a voluntary program and does not
provide coverage of all cogeneration
units. The Energy Information
Administration does collect information
on cogeneration from utility and nonutility power generators greater than 1
megawatt (MW).14
2. Non-Federal Data Collection
Programs
EPA is aware of a number of State,
regional, and international GHG
reporting programs that are in place or
under development. In developing this
proposed rule amendment, EPA
reviewed 18 State programs. A summary
of these State programs may be found in
the docket at EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–
0925. EPA also reviewed four other
reporting initiatives or protocols: The
Climate Registry (TCR), the World
Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse
Gas Protocol, the Regional Greenhouse
Gas Initiative (RGGI), and the Western
Climate Initiative (WCI). In reviewing
these GHG reporting programs, EPA
considered whether they contain
information on U.S. parent company,
NAICS code(s), or cogeneration that is
comparable in coverage (of facilities and
suppliers), specific information
collected, data quality and timeliness, to
what would be required under this
proposed rule amendment. EPA also
considered whether the Agency had
access to the data collected under these
programs.
In general, EPA found that the data
collected under State and other nonFederal data collection programs are
designed to serve the specific purposes
of those programs and do not appear to
meet the objectives of this proposed rule
amendment.
U.S. Parent Company
EPA identified two State programs—
those in California and Delaware—that
require reporting of parent company
13 https://www.epa.gov/chp.
14 EIA–860, Annual Electric Generator Report
https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/
eia860.html: and,
EIA–861, Annual Electric Power Industry Report
https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/
eia861.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18459
information. The Climate Registry and
WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol also
encourage reporters to list their parent
company on a voluntary basis but do
not require this information. The
Climate Registry and WRI Greenhouse
Gas Protocol encourage participating
organizations to report their GHG
emissions at the highest organizational
level (e.g., corporate level), and that the
organization account for all emissions
sources. RGGI collects information on
corporate associations from those
organizations that submit bids in its
annual GHG allowance auctions.
Additional information on the
collection of corporate and/or parent
company information by California,
Delaware, TCR, WCI, and RGGI, as well
as on the WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol,
may be found in the docket at EPA–HQ–
OAR–2009–0925.
Primary and Other NAICS Codes
All of the State programs require
reporting of either the NAICS codes or
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes. The Western Climate Initiative is
the only regional reporting program that
requires reporters to submit their NAICS
codes as part of their annual report.
Cogeneration
Most State reporting programs do not
require separate reporting of
cogeneration emissions or notification
regarding the operation of cogeneration
units. RGGI does not require any
additional reporting for cogeneration
units. WCI requires limited information
on type of unit and thermal output.15 16
However, WCI is considering including
separate reporting requirements for
cogeneration units.17
Of the State programs that require
cogeneration reporting, the California
and New Mexico programs have the
most extensive reporting requirements.
For these programs, reporters with a
cogeneration unit must report detailed
information on the type of unit; the
amount of electricity generated; the
amount of thermal energy produced; the
amount of electricity and thermal
energy used on site, sold to a distributer,
15 Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Final
Model Rule, December 31, 2008 (https://
www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/
remository/Reporting-Committee-Documents/DraftEssential-Requirements-for-Mandatory-Reporting—
Final-Draft-(May-7&-2009)/orderby,4/page,1/).
16 Western Climate Initiative: Final Essential
Requirements for Mandatory Reporting—July 15,
2009 (https://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/
component/remository/func-startdown/118/).
17 Western Climate Initiative: Background
Document and Progress Report for Essential
Requirements of Mandatory Reporting for the
Western Climate Initiative, January 6, 2009
(https://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/
component/remository/func-startdown/74/).
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18460
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
or provided directly to another
company; the total GHG emissions for
the unit; the GHG emissions allocated to
thermal energy output; and the GHG
emissions allocated to electricity
generation. The California reporting rule
also requires the amount of
supplemental fuel consumed by duct
burners for heat recovery steam
generators.18 19
Although reporting of cogeneration is
not required by TCR, reporters are
encouraged to report emissions at the
unit level and to allocate emissions
between electric and thermal energy
outputs for cogeneration units.20
II. Proposed Rule Amendment and
Rationale
This section of the preamble explains
the requirements of the proposed rule
amendment as well as the rationale for
EPA’s proposal for collecting the
additional data elements summarized in
Section I.B. of this preamble.
This proposed rule amendment would
provide information useful to EPA in
carrying out a number of potential
nonregulatory and regulatory efforts
authorized under the CAA, including
informing the development of future
climate change strategies. For example,
through data collected under this
proposed rule amendment, EPA would
gain a better understanding of the
aggregate GHG emissions of
corporations and specific industry
sectors.
A. U.S. Parent Company
Although the proposed rule language
includes the requirements for only one
option (i.e., Option 2 below), EPA is
proposing two options for collecting
U.S. parent company information:
Option 1
EPA is proposing to require all
facilities and suppliers subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule (40 CFR
part 98) to provide the legal name and
physical address of their U.S. parent
company. Under this option, a reporter’s
U.S. parent company is defined as the
highest-level company, located in the
United States, and with the largest
ownership interest in the reporting
entity as of December 31 of the reporting
year. The U.S. parent company’s
physical address is defined as the street
address, city, state and zip code of the
U.S. parent company’s physical
location.
Each reporter would also be required
to indicate one of the following with
respect to its ownership status:
• ‘‘S’’—single ownership (the
reporting entity is entirely owned by a
single company which is not owned by
any other company, e.g., it is not a
subsidiary or division of another
company).
• ‘‘W’’—wholly owned (the reporting
entity is entirely owned by a single
company which is, itself, owned by
another company, e.g., it is a subsidiary
or division of another company).
• ‘‘M’’—multiple owners (the
reporting entity is owned by more than
one company).21
Option 2
EPA is also proposing that reporters
list the names and physical addresses of
all of their U.S. parent companies and
their respective percentages of
ownership. Under Option 2, EPA
proposes to define U.S. parent
company(s) as the highest-level U.S.
company(s) with an ownership interest
in the reporting entity as of December
31 of the reporting year. The physical
address of a U.S. parent company is
defined as the street address, city, state
and zip code of the U.S. parent
company’s physical location.
With this option EPA recognizes that
some facilities and suppliers may be
owned by multiple companies and seeks
to gather a more complete picture of the
ownership status for each reporter.
Facilities and suppliers would be
required to report all of their U.S. parent
companies regardless of the percentage
of their ownership stake. Note that this
option would not necessarily ask for all
of the owners in an individual reporter’s
corporate structure, just the highestlevel parent companies. If a facility or
supplier has only one parent company,
that company should be reported at 100
percent.
Reporting all U.S. parent companies
by their percentage of ownership would
provide EPA with a more complete
picture of a facility’s or supplier’s
parent companies rather than having
information solely on the parent
company with the largest ownership
interest. This option would provide EPA
with a more complete data set.
EPA is proposing to provide the
following instruction to reporters on
how to report the U.S. parent
company(s) data element under options
1 and 2 as described above:
Each reporter must provide the legal
name(s) and physical address(es) of
their U.S. parent company(s). Table 2 of
this preamble provides examples along
with additional instruction to assist
with the determination of a reporter’s
U.S. parent company(s):
TABLE 2—PROPOSED INSTRUCTION FOR REPORTERS ON HOW TO REPORT U.S. PARENT COMPANY(S)
How to report U.S. parent company under
Option 1
How to report U.S. parent company under
Option 2
The reporting entity is entirely owned by a single U.S. company that is not owned by any
other company (e.g., it is not a subsidiary or
division of another company).
The reporting entity is entirely owned by a single U.S. company which is, itself, owned by
another company (e.g., it is a division or subsidiary of a higher-level company).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Reporting scenario
Provide that company’s legal name and physical address as the U.S. parent company.
Mark ‘‘S’’ for Single Ownership in the associated box.
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the highest-level company in the ownership hierarchy as the U.S. parent company.
Mark ‘‘W’’ for Wholly Owned in the associated box.
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the company with the largest ownership
interest as the U.S. parent company. Mark
‘‘M’’ for Multiple Owners.
Provide that company’s legal name and physical address as the U.S. parent company.
Enter 100% as the percent ownership
The reporting entity is owned by more than one
U.S. company (e.g., company A owns 40%,
company B owns 35% and company C owns
25%).
18 California Code of Regulations, Title 17,
Section 95112.
19 New Mexico Greenhouse Gas Mandatory
Emissions Reporting: Emissions Quantification
Procedures for 20.2.73 NMAC and 20.2.87 NMAC,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Emissions Year 2009. https://
www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/ghg/documents/
NM_GHGEI_quantif_procedures_2009.pdf).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the highest-level company in the ownership hierarchy as the U.S. parent company.
Enter 100% as the percent ownership.
Provide the legal names and physical addresses of all of the companies with an
ownership interest as U.S. parent companies. Enter the percent ownership of each
company.
20 The Climate Registry: General Reporting
Protocol, Version 1.1, May 2008 (https://
www.theclimateregistry.org).
21 This information, ‘‘S’’, ‘‘W’’ and ‘‘M’’ would not
be required under Option 2.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
18461
TABLE 2—PROPOSED INSTRUCTION FOR REPORTERS ON HOW TO REPORT U.S. PARENT COMPANY(S)—Continued
Reporting scenario
How to report U.S. parent company under
Option 1
How to report U.S. parent company under
Option 2
The reporting entity is entirely owned by a foreign company.
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the foreign company’s highest-level company based in the U.S. as the U.S. parent
company. Mark ‘‘W’’ for Wholly Owned in
the associated box.
(1) If the reporting entity is not entirely owned
by the foreign company, but the foreign
company has the largest ownership interest, then provide the legal name and physical address of the foreign company’s highest-level company based in the U.S. as the
U.S. parent company. Mark ‘‘M’’ for Multiple
Owners in the associated box.
(2) If the foreign company does not have the
largest ownership interest in the reporting
entity, then provide the name and physical
address of the company with the largest
ownership interest as the U.S. parent company. Mark ‘‘M’’ for Multiple Owners in the
associated box.
The joint venture or cooperative is its own
U.S. parent company. Provide the joint venture or cooperative’s legal name and physical address as the U.S. parent company.
Mark ‘‘W’’ for Wholly Owned in the associated box.
Enter U.S. Government, and leave the address field and ownership box blank.
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the foreign company’s highest-level company based in the U.S. as the U.S. parent
company. Enter 100% as the percent ownership.
Provide the legal name and physical address
of the foreign entity’s highest-level company
based in the U.S., along with the legal
names and physical addresses of all the
other companies with an ownership interest,
as U.S. parent companies. Enter the percent ownership of each company.
The reporting entity is partially owned by a foreign company.
The reporting entity is owned by a joint venture
or cooperative.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
The reporting entity is a Federally-owned facility
EPA may issue additional guidance
for reporters after this proposed rule
amendment is finalized.
The proposed definition of U.S.
parent company used in this proposed
rule amendment is similar to that used
in the TRI program. However, to
improve data quality, EPA is proposing
to slightly modify the definition of the
U.S. parent company used in the TRI
program for the purposes of this
proposed rule amendment. EPA is
proposing to adjust the ownership
criteria used in the TRI definition of
U.S. parent company from over 50
percent of voting stock to largest
ownership interest in the company for
the purpose of this action only. EPA is
not proposing to alter the definition
used for the TRI program. In reviewing
TRI data, EPA has determined that the
TRI definition may result in incomplete
information in situations where a
company has multiple owners, but no
one company owns over 50 percent.
In addition, EPA reviewed how
corporations and/or parent companies
are defined in the WRI Greenhouse Gas
Protocol, TCR, and RGGI to determine if
some or all of the definitions could be
applied to this proposed rule
amendment. Neither WRI, TCR, nor
RGGI have a definition of U.S. parent
company, and after a review of the
programs, EPA determined that the
definitions of corporation (and similar
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
terminology depending on the program)
are not appropriate for this proposed
rule amendment. For a summary of this
analysis please see the docket at EPA–
HQ–OAR–2009–0925.
The joint venture or cooperative is its own
U.S. parent company. Provide the joint venture or cooperative’s legal name and physical address as the U.S. parent company.
Enter 100% as the percent ownership.
Enter U.S. Government, and leave the address and percent ownership fields blank.
The purpose of collecting the name
and physical address of the U.S. parent
company(s) on the annual reporting
form for the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule is to assist in aggregating facilitybased GHG emissions data to the
corporate level. This additional data
element would allow EPA to compile
more comprehensive information on
corporate GHG emissions and conduct a
variety of analyses. EPA received some
comments on the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule from various entities
supporting the collection of parent
company data and emphasizing the
importance of being able to aggregate
the data to the corporate level. For
example, one commenter stated that
‘‘Company identification is a critical
requirement for * * * understanding
the impact, risks, and opportunities
* * * due to climate change.’’ 22
Another commenter stated, ‘‘That the
EPA [should] add a requirement that
facilities subject to reporting under the
proposed rule clearly identify their
parent company and the proportion of
the facility the parent/holding company
owns. Without this information it is
very difficult to consolidate facility
level data to company level data
* * *’’ 23
EPA recognizes that data aggregated at
the corporate level would likely be
incomplete because the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule requires reporting of
only those emissions for which
calculation methods are provided in the
rule and, for certain source categories,
requires reporting only from those
facilities and suppliers whose emissions
are above specified thresholds. In other
words, corporate-level data might be
incomplete, because 40 CFR part 98
does not cover all GHG emissions from
every source, and some facilities and
operations within a company may not
be required to report their GHG
emissions.
However, collecting information on
U.S. parent company(s) would augment
and complement the facility-level GHG
emission data currently collected under
the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule and
would not be repetitive of information
already collected in the rule. In
addition, the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule covers approximately 85 percent of
U.S. GHG emissions, therefore the data
22 Comment Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–
0508–0415.1.
23 Comment Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–
0508–0984.1.
Rationale
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18462
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
collected under this proposed rule
amendment would be useful.
Under Option 1, each reporter would
report the legal name and physical
address of their highest-level U.S.
parent company and would select from
a list of three possible ownership
structures, selecting the type of
ownership that best describes the
ownership structure for the facility or
supplier. Using this approach, EPA
would collect information on whether a
facility or supplier is owned by a single
entity or multiple entities. Option 1
would enable EPA to collect additional
data on the ownership structure of a
facility or supplier, which would allow
(with additional research) a more
complete picture of a facility’s or
supplier’s GHG emissions among U.S.
parent companies, without requiring
facilities to list all of their owners.
Under Option 2, facilities and
suppliers would report the legal names
and physical addresses of all their U.S.
parent companies together with each
U.S. parent company’s percentage of
ownership. The advantage of this option
is that it would provide EPA with a
more complete picture of a facility’s or
supplier’s parent companies rather than
having information on solely the parent
company with the largest ownership
interest.
Other Data Element Considered
EPA considered adding a requirement
to this proposed rule amendment to
report a numeric corporate identifier
derived from a database that would
verify the facility-parent company
linkage. EPA considered both private
and public sources of facility-parent
company identifiers including the
following: Dun & Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS),
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Central Index Key, Stock Tickers,
Committee on Uniform Security
Identification Procedures (CUSIP),
Federal Employee Identification
Numbers (FEIN), National Institutes of
Health (NIH) Electronic Research
Administration, and LexisNexis. For a
summary of these corporate identifiers
please see the docket at EPA–HQ–OAR–
2009–0925. EPA decided not to propose
a numeric identifier because none of the
options considered meet the Agency’s
data needs. The privately held databases
such as Dun & Bradstreet DUNS and
CUSIP require a licensing agreement
with the Agency, which potentially
restricts the use of the data. In addition,
users outside of EPA would need to
purchase a license to use the numeric
identifier data element. Several of the
options considered, such as stock
tickers, CUSIP, SEC central index key,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
and LexisNexis only cover public
corporations. The Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule covers both private and
public corporations. In accordance with
Internal Revenue Code 6103, FEINs can
only be collected and released on a
voluntary basis and EPA would have no
method for evaluating the quality of the
information. Accordingly we are not
proposing a corporate numeric
identifier.
B. NAICS Code
In addition to collecting information
on each reporter’s U.S. parent
company(s), this proposed rule
amendment would require each facility
or supplier reporting under the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule to
report its primary NAICS code and any
other NAICS codes applicable to its
facility. This information is useful
because it would provide an additional
data element that can assist EPA to
further aggregate and analyze the data
collected under the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule at the sector level.
For the purposes of this proposed rule
amendment, EPA is proposing to define
a reporter’s primary North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code as the six-digit code that represents
the reporter’s primary product/activity/
service at the facility, as defined in
‘‘North American Industry Classification
System Manual 2007,’’ available from
the U.S. Department of Commerce,
National Technical Information Service.
The primary NAICS code is the
principal source of revenue. EPA is
proposing to define additional NAICS
codes as those codes that correspond to
product(s)/activity(s)/service(s) that
provide economic profit, but that are not
related to the principal source of
revenue. EPA considered using three
and four digit NAICS codes, but chose
the six digit NAICS code(s) because they
provide more detailed information. In
addition, use of the six digit NAICS
codes is consistent with TRI and other
EPA databases. Therefore, the six digit
NAICS codes allow data to be compared
across EPA data sets.
EPA is proposing the following
instructions to reporters regarding the
designation of NAICS code(s):
Enter the six-digit North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code that most accurately describes the
primary product/activity/service at the
facility, based on value of shipments. A
facility may consist of two or more
distinct and separate economic units
that may have different NAICS codes.
Provide all other NAICS codes relating
to product(s)/activity(s)/service(s) that
provide economic profit, but that are not
related to the principal source of
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
revenue for your facility, in order of
largest revenue to smallest. For
additional guidance on how to
determine the proper NAICS code(s) go
to https://www.census.gov/eos/www/
naics/.
Federal facilities should report the
NAICS code that most closely represents
the activities taking place at the site. For
example, a federally-owned, fossil-fuel
fired electrical power plant would be
classified as 221112—electric power
generation, fossil fuels.
The proposed definition and
instructions for reporting NAICS codes
are consistent with those used by TRI
and other EPA data collections. In
addition, the definition and
methodology for determining the
primary NAICS code for a facility are
consistent with the definition and
methodology used by the Bureau of the
Census and other government agencies.
C. Cogeneration
EPA is proposing to require that
reporters subject to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule indicate (by checking
yes or no) whether some or all of the
GHG emissions they report are from a
cogeneration (also known as combined
heat and power (CHP)) unit located at
the facility. For the purposes of this
proposal, a cogeneration unit is defined
as a unit that produces electric energy
and useful thermal energy for industrial,
commercial, or heating and cooling
purposes, through the sequential [or
simultaneous] use of the original fuel
energy.24 EPA based this proposed
definition of cogeneration on the
Agency’s Acid Rain Program to promote
consistency and comparable data
collection across EPA regulatory
programs.
Cogeneration units generate both
electricity and thermal energy from a
single fuel source. Because less fuel is
burned to produce each unit of energy
output, cogeneration is more efficient
than separate generation of electricity
and thermal energy to meet the facility’s
loads, thereby reducing air pollution
and GHG emissions. Additional
efficiencies and emissions reductions
are gained by the reduction or
elimination of transmission and
distribution line losses associated with
transporting central station generation.
Facilities with cogeneration units may
increase their on-site GHG emissions
when compared to similar facilities
purchasing central-station electricity
and generating separate thermal energy
on-site. This can occur because the
facility is using cogeneration to
efficiently generate electric and thermal
24 40
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
CFR 72.2.
12APP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
energy for its own use and in some
cases, selling excess power to the grid.
While more fuel is being burned on site,
it is displacing purchased central
electric generation off-site, as well as the
stand-alone generation of on site
thermal energy, and the associated GHG
emissions. Even in these cases,
cogeneration units can result in net
reductions of GHG emissions compared
to separate power and heat generation.
Information on the types and
characteristics of facilities that employ
cogeneration technologies and the
performance of cogeneration units could
be important to future development of
greenhouse gas mitigation strategies.
EPA recognizes that the information
required under this proposal may not,
by itself, be sufficient to determine the
actual quantity of GHG emissions
occurring from cogeneration units at
individual reporting facilities,
companies or NAICS sectors. It would
also not provide the degree to which
those cogeneration emissions displace
fossil fuel or other fuel source emissions
from central station generation plants.
However, the proposed information
would allow EPA and States to identify
facilities using cogeneration. In
addition, EPA recognizes that not all
emissions at individual reporting
facilities with cogeneration are
attributable to the cogeneration unit(s).
As such, it should not be inferred that
all emissions at an individual reporting
facility with cogeneration are attributed
to the cogeneration unit(s).
This information is not currently
collected by EPA and only limited data
are available from other Federal and
State programs. EPA’s Combined Heat
and Power Partnership,25 a voluntary
program created in 2001, requires that
Partners complete a Letter of Intent that
states that Partner agrees to provide data
on existing Combined Heat and Power
(also known as cogeneration) projects
and new project development to help
EPA determine climate benefits.
Because the Combined Heat and Power
Partnership is a voluntary program, it is
not a comprehensive source for this
data. The data available from the Energy
Information Administration of the U.S.
Department of Energy is limited to
utility and non-utility power generators
greater than 1 MW.26 By requiring all
facilities subject to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule to report the operation of
cogeneration units at their facility, EPA
would significantly broaden its
25 https://www.epa.gov/chp.
26 EIA–860, Annual Electric Generator Report
https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/
eia860.html: and, EIA–861, Annual Electric Power
Industry Report https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/
electricity/page/eia861.html.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
knowledge regarding the current
implementation of cogeneration in all
sectors of the economy. By collecting
this information annually, EPA would
also be able to track changes in the use
of this technology in individual sectors
and across the entire U.S. economy.
The burden of reporting this
additional information to EPA would be
minimal, because reporters are already
required to submit annual reports and
should readily know (or could quickly
determine), whether there is a
cogeneration unit at the facility.
D. Frequency of Reporting
EPA is proposing to require that
facilities and suppliers subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule submit
information regarding their U.S. parent
company, their NAICS code(s), and
whether or not any of their reported
emissions are from a cogeneration unit,
on an annual basis, as part of their
annual reports. EPA is further proposing
to require that regulated entities report
this information as it exists on
December 31 of the reporting year, to be
consistent with other EPA reporting
programs, such as TRI.
EPA recognizes that a reporter’s U.S.
parent company and/or NAICS code(s)
may change during the course of the
year. In some instances this information
may even change multiple times
throughout the year. However, EPA
determined that if it were to require
reporters to update these data elements
more than once a year, such as every
time there is a change in a reporter’s
U.S. parent company, or in its primary
product, activity, or service, the burden
of this information collection would be
greater than the benefit of obtaining that
additional information. Therefore, EPA
is proposing that reporters only be
required to report on these data
elements once a year, as part of their
regularly scheduled annual reports.
E. Applicability
EPA proposes that all facilities and
suppliers subject to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule be required to report the
additional information proposed in this
amendment. The proposed definitions
of ‘‘U.S. parent company,’’ ‘‘primary and
other applicable NAICS code(s),’’ and
‘‘cogeneration unit’’ would apply only to
this proposal to add these data elements
to the list of items that must be reported
under 40 CFR 98.3(c) of subpart A. The
proposed definitions would not change
the applicability of any subpart in the
promulgated Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule (40 CFR part 98). They also would
not change the level of reporting or who
is required to submit reports.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18463
The proposed definition of U.S.
parent company would not override or
change the meaning of similar terms
that refer to company level or corporate
level requirements. Many subparts
(including subparts A, C, G, K, P, Q, R,
Y, GG, and HH) use the term ‘‘company
records,’’ which is defined in subpart A.
The term ‘‘corporate level’’ is used in
subpart MM to require importers and
exporters to report at the corporate
level, rather than the facility level.
‘‘Corporate documents’’ are referred to in
subpart A. None of these terms,
definitions, or associated requirements
would be affected by the proposed
definition of ‘‘U.S. parent company.’’
In addition, the proposed definition of
U.S. parent company would also not
affect the definitions of ‘‘importer’’ and
‘‘exporter’’ in subpart A, or the
applicability of the suppliers source
categories (40 CFR part 98). The
proposed definition also does not affect
the term ‘‘local distribution company’’ as
described in 40 CFR part 98, subpart
NN. These terms retain their meaning in
the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.
F. Request for Comment
EPA requests comments on its
proposal to require reporters under the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule (40 CFR
part 98) to provide information
regarding their U.S. parent company,
their NAICS code(s), and whether any of
their reported emissions are from a
cogeneration unit.
While EPA is interested in receiving
comments on the proposal in its
entirety, EPA is particularly interested
in receiving comments on the following
issues. First, EPA is interested in
receiving comments on using numeric
corporate identifiers and whether there
are additional numeric identifiers the
Agency should consider for this
proposed rule amendment.
Second, EPA solicits comments on
whether it should be mandatory or
voluntary for reporters to indicate
whether or not any of their emissions
arise from the operation of cogeneration
units. EPA is interested in receiving
comments, data, and analysis on both
the option of mandating the disclosure
of this information, and the option of
making the reporting of this information
voluntary.
Third, EPA solicits comments on
whether facilities and suppliers owned
by foreign companies always have a
U.S.-based parent company as defined
in today’s proposal. EPA is interested in
receiving comments, data and analysis
on whether there may be instances
where foreign-owned facilities and
suppliers do not have a U.S. parent
company. Where commenters believe
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18464
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
that such instances may occur, EPA
seeks suggestions on how to address this
issue.
Lastly, EPA solicits comments
regarding the utility and burden of
updating the additional information
required by this proposed rule
amendment on a more frequent basis
than the proposed annual reporting. For
example, should reporters be required to
update the information whenever
changes occur with respect to a
reporter’s U.S. parent company or
NAICS code(s)?
While this notice seeks comments on
EPA’s proposal to collect information on
the U.S. parent company(s) and NAICS
code(s) of facilities and suppliers
required to report under the Mandatory
GHG Reporting Rule, and on whether
any of the emissions reported by these
entities are from cogeneration units,
EPA is not reopening the final
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, and is
seeking no further comment on the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.
III. Economic Impacts of the Proposed
Rule Amendment
This section of the preamble examines
the costs and economic impacts of the
proposed rulemaking and the estimated
economic impacts of the rule on affected
entities, including estimated impacts on
small entities. Complete detail on the
economic impacts of the proposed rule
can be found in the text of the Economic
Impact Analysis (EIA) (EPA–HQ–OAR–
2009–0925).
A. How were compliance costs
estimated?
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Summary of Method Used To
Estimate Compliance Costs
The cost analysis estimates the
incremental contributions to total
reporting burden expected under the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule and
compliance costs associated with
reporting the data elements described
above. EPA estimated compliance costs
based on the time reporters spend
meeting the proposed requirements and
the associated labor wage rates. EPA’s
estimated costs of compliance are
discussed below and in greater detail in
Section 4 of the Economic Impact
Analysis (EIA) (EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–
0925).
Labor Costs. All of the reporting costs
include the time of managers, lawyers,
and technical staff in both the private
sector and the public sector. To reflect
that both management and technical
staff will be involved in reporting the
above data elements, an overall blended
wage rate was developed based on
estimates from the Toxics Release
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Inventory (TRI) program for similar data
element reporting at similar facilities.
Management staff is estimated to be
involved in approximately 0.8 percent
of the reporting, while technical staff is
likely to be needed for the remaining
99.2 percent. Thus, the blended wage
rate used in this analysis is $60.22 per
hour. The amount of time required to
provide the required information is
estimated to be, under Option 1, 80
minutes per facility in the first year and
40 minutes per facility in subsequent
years. Under Option 2, the amount of
time required for facilities with one
owner is 80 minutes per facility in the
first year and 40 minutes per facility in
subsequent years; time estimated for
facilities with more than one owner is
125 minutes per facility in the first year
and 85 minutes per facility in
subsequent years.
Cost basis. The cost analysis is based
on facilities and suppliers currently
subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule and does not account for those
expected to be added to the program
through upcoming supplemental
proposals. The methods and
assumptions used to estimate the
compliance costs for facilities and
suppliers currently subject to the rule
would likewise apply to those that may
be added to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule program in the future.
The addition of new facilities or
suppliers would increase the total
compliance costs in proportion to the
increase of the reporting universe.
Accordingly, EPA does not expect the
burden for newly added industries to
change the conclusions of this economic
analysis.
B. What are the costs of the rule?
1. Summary of Costs
As shown in Table 3 of this preamble,
the total national cost under Option 1 is
approximately $877,000 in the first year
and about $436,000 in subsequent years
(all estimates are in $2006). These
estimates include a public sector burden
estimate of $85,000 in the first year and
$40,000 in subsequent years for program
implementation and verification
activities.
Total national cost under Option 2 is
approximately $889,000 in the first year
and about $443,000 in subsequent years
(all estimates are in $2006). Option 2
costs include a public sector burden
estimate of $90,000 in the first year and
$40,000 in subsequent years for program
implementation and verification
activities. See Table 3 in the next
section for a summary of the costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. What are the economic impacts of the
rule?
1. Summary of Economic Impacts
EPA prepared an economic analysis to
evaluate the impacts of the proposed
rule. The analysis estimates the private
direct compliance costs per facility and
provides a national burden estimate,
which includes public costs associated
with program implementation and
verification activities. Reporting costs
were estimated to be less than $100 per
facility. As a result, the rule is unlikely
to result in significant changes in firms’
production decisions or economic
choices.
D. What Are the Impacts of the Rule on
Small Businesses?
1. Summary of Impacts on Small
Businesses
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) and the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA), EPA assessed
the potential impacts of the rule on
small entities (small businesses,
governments, and non-profit
organizations). (See Section VI.C of this
preamble for definitions of small
entities.)
EPA conducted a screening
assessment comparing compliance costs
for affected industry sectors to industryspecific receipts data for establishments
owned by small businesses. This ratio
constitutes a ‘‘sales’’ test that computes
the annualized compliance costs of this
rule as a percentage of sales and
determines whether the ratio exceeds
some level (e.g., 1 percent or 3 percent).
The average ratio of annualized
reporting program costs to revenues
would be less than 0.01%. As a result,
EPA has concluded that this action will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to review under the EO.
Although this is not a significant
economic rule, EPA prepared an
analysis of the potential costs and
benefits associated with the proposed
rule amendment to provide insights on
the potential effects. This analysis is
contained in the Economic Impact
Analysis. A copy of the analysis is
available in the docket (EPA–HQ–OAR–
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18465
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
2009–0925) for this action and is briefly
summarized here. In the economic
analysis, EPA has identified the
proposed rule’s two alternative options
as well as a summary of the compliance
burden and the costs. The cost analysis,
presented in Section III of this
preamble, estimates the total annualized
burden, which is presented in Table 3
of this preamble:
TABLE 3—COST SUMMARY FOR TWO ALTERNATIVES UNDER THE PROPOSED RULEMAKING
Option 1 (in thousands, $2006)
Cost
Subsequent
years
Year 1
Option 2 (in thousands, $2006)
Subsequent
years
Year 1
National compliance ........................................................................................
Public ...............................................................................................................
$792
85
$396
40
$799
90
$403
40
Total ..........................................................................................................
877
436
889
443
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Overall, EPA has concluded that the
costs of the proposal to collect U.S.
parent company(s), NAICS codes, and
cogeneration information as part of the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule are
outweighed by the potential benefits of
more comprehensive information about
GHG emissions.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements for this proposed rule
amendment has been submitted for
approval to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
An Information Collection Request (ICR)
document was previously prepared for
the final Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule and was assigned EPA ICR number
2300.03. The information collection
requirements of this proposed rule
amendment to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule are documented in an
additional ICR document, which was
assigned EPA ICR number 2374.01.
The collection of additional
information from facilities and suppliers
reporting under the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule identifying U.S. parent
company(s), primary and other
applicable NAICS codes, and an
indication of whether or not the
reported emissions include any
emissions from a cogeneration unit,
would assist EPA in aggregating facility
level data to the corporate and sector
levels. In addition, users of the data
could compare emissions among
facilities with and without cogeneration.
This proposed rule amendment would
provide information useful for a variety
of policies, and potential nonregulatory
and regulatory efforts, including
informing the development of future
climate change regulatory strategies. For
example, through data collected under
this proposed rule amendment, EPA
would gain a better understanding of the
aggregate GHG emissions of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
corporations and specific industry
sectors.
This information collection is
mandatory and will be carried out under
CAA section 114. Information identified
and marked as CBI will not be disclosed
except in accordance with procedures
set forth in 40 CFR part 2. However,
emissions information collected under
CAA section 114 cannot be claimed as
CBI and will be made public.
The projected average annual cost and
hour burden for non-Federal
respondents is about $528,000 and
8,800 hours under option 1 and
$535,000 and 8,900 hours under option
2. The estimated average annual burden
per response is 0.15 hour per either
option; the proposed frequency of
response is annual for all respondents
that must comply with the proposed
rule amendment; and the estimated
average number of likely respondents
per year is 9,868 under either option.
The cost burden to respondents
resulting from the collection of
information includes the total capital
cost annualized over the equipment’s
expected useful life (averaging $ 0), a
total operation and maintenance
component (averaging $0 per year), and
a labor cost component (averaging
$528,000 per year under Option 1 and
$535,000 under Option 2). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
To comment on the Agency’s need for
this information, the accuracy of the
provided burden estimates, and any
suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, EPA has established
a public docket for this proposed rule
amendment. Submit any comments
related to the ICR to EPA and OMB. See
ADDRESSES section at the beginning of
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
this notice for where to submit
comments to EPA. Send comments to
OMB at the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Since
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the ICR between 30 and 60
days after April 12, 2010, a comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it by May 12,
2010. The final rule amendment will
respond to any OMB or public
comments on the information collection
requirements contained in this proposal.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule amendment subject
to notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute, unless the agency
certifies that the rule amendment will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of the proposed rule amendment on
small entities, small entity is defined as:
(1) A small business as defined by the
Small Business Administration’s
regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a
small governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of the proposed rule
amendment on small entities, I certify
that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The additional per-entity costs under
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18466
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
each option are substantially smaller
(option 1: Less than $81 in year 1 and
$41 in subsequent years) (option 2: Less
than $81 in year 1 and $41 in
subsequent years) than the burden for
the overall rule. The costs are therefore
not enough to constitute a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The small
entities directly regulated by the
proposed rule amendment include small
businesses across all sectors
encompassed by the rule, small
governmental jurisdictions and small
non-profits. We have determined that
some small businesses will be affected
because their production processes emit
GHGs that must be reported, or because
they have stationary combustion units
on site that emit GHGs that must be
reported. Small governments and small
non-profits are generally affected
because they have regulated landfills or
stationary combustion units on site, or
because they own a local distribution
company subject to 40 CFR part 98,
subpart NN (natural gas suppliers).
At promulgation of the final
Mandatory GHG Reporting rule, EPA
examined the impact on small entities
(74 FR 56369). In addition, EPA
described the steps the EPA took to
reduce the impact of the Mandatory
GHG Reporting Rule on small entities
(74 FR 56369).
EPA continues to be interested in the
potential impacts of the proposed rule
amendment on small entities and
welcomes comments on issues related to
such impacts.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, requires Federal agencies,
unless otherwise prohibited by law, to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector.
Federal agencies must also develop a
plan to provide notice to small
governments that might be significantly
or uniquely affected by any regulatory
requirements. The plan must enable
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates and must
inform, educate, and advise small
governments on compliance with the
regulatory requirements.
The proposed rule amendment does
not contain a Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or
more for State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the
private sector in any one year. As shown
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
in the Economic Impact Analysis, EPA
estimated the several national cost
estimates and found annual
expenditures were below $100 million
threshold ($400,000 to $1.5 million,
including the sensitivity analysis.)
Thus, the proposed rule amendment is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 or 205 of UMRA.
The proposed rule amendment is also
not subject to the requirements of
section 203 of UMRA because it
contains no regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The proposed new
rule requires facilities and suppliers
already subject to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule to provide additional
data in each annual GHG report, and the
additional data elements required are
the same for all reporters (private and
public). In addition, EPA’s small entity
analysis shows the average ratio of
annualized reporting program costs to
revenues would be less than 0.01
percent.
The proposed rule amendment to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule applies
directly to reporters that supply fuel or
industrial gases that when used emit
greenhouse gases, and to reporters that
directly emit greenhouses gases. The
proposed rule amendment does not
apply to governmental entities unless
the government entity owns a facility
that directly emits greenhouse gases
above threshold levels such as a landfill
or large stationary combustion source.
In addition, the proposed rule
amendment does not impose any
implementation responsibilities on
State, local, or Tribal governments and
it is not expected to increase the cost of
existing regulatory programs managed
by those governments. Thus, the
impacts on governments affected by the
proposed rule amendment are expected
to be minimal.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in EO
13132. However, for a more detailed
discussion about how the Mandatory
GHG Reporting Rule relates to existing
State programs, please see Section II of
the preamble to the final Mandatory
GHG Reporting Rule (74 FR 56266).
This proposed rule amendment
applies directly to reporters that supply
fuel or chemicals that when used emit
greenhouse gases or facilities that
directly emit greenhouses gases. It does
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not apply to governmental entities
unless the government entity owns a
facility that directly emits greenhouse
gases above threshold levels such as a
landfill or large stationary combustion
source, so relatively few government
facilities would be affected. This
proposed rule amendment also does not
limit the power of States or localities to
collect GHG data and/or regulate GHG
emissions. Thus, EO 13132 does not
apply to this action.
In the spirit of EO 13132, and
consistent with EPA policy to promote
communications between EPA and State
and local governments, EPA specifically
solicits comments on this proposed
action from State and local officials.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed rule amendment is not
expected to have Tribal implications, as
specified in EO 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). The proposed
amendment applies directly to entities
that supply fuel or chemicals that when
used emit greenhouse gases or facilities
that directly emit greenhouses gases.
This proposed rule amendment does not
pose significant costs on either a perentity or national basis; few, if any,
facilities or suppliers that are expected
to be affected by the proposed rule
amendment are anticipated to be owned
by Tribal governments. This proposed
rule amendment also does not limit the
power of Tribes to collect GHG data
and/or regulate GHG emissions. Thus,
EO 13175 does not apply to the
proposed amendment.
Although EO 13175 does not apply to
this proposed rule amendment, EPA
sought opportunities to provide
information to Tribal governments and
representatives during development of
the rule amendment, as documented in
the preamble to the promulgated
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule (74 FR
56371).
EPA specifically solicits additional
comment on this proposed rule
amendment from Tribal officials.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only
to those regulatory actions that concern
health or safety risks, such that the
analysis required under section 5–501 of
the EO has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
EO 13045 because it does not establish
an environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to EO 13211
(66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because
it is not a significant regulatory action
under EO 12866.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to
use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This proposed rule amendment does
not involve technical standards.
Therefore, EPA is not considering the
use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule amendment will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. The proposed rule
amendment does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment because it addresses
information collection and reporting.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 98
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
reference, Suppliers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 98—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 98
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A—[Amended]
2. Section 98.3 is amended as follows:
a. By adding paragraph (c)(4)(v).
b. By adding paragraph (c)(10).
c. By adding paragraph (c)(11).
§ 98.3 What are the general monitoring,
reporting, recordkeeping and verification
requirements of this part?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) Indicate whether reported
emissions from the facility include
emissions from a cogeneration unit (yes
or no).
*
*
*
*
*
(10) NAICS code(s) that apply to the
facility or supplier.
(i) Primary NAICS code. Report the
NAICS code(s) that most accurately
describes the primary product/activity/
service at the facility, based on revenue.
The primary product/activity/service at
the facility provides economic profit
and is the principal source of revenue.
(ii) Additional NAICS code(s). Report
additional NAICS codes that correspond
to product(s)/activity(s)/service(s) at the
facility that provide economic profit,
but that are not related to the principal
source of revenue. If more than one
additional NAICS code applies, list the
additional NAICS codes in the order of
the largest revenue to the smallest.
(11) Legal name(s) and physical
address(es) of the highest-level United
States parent company(s) and the
percentage of ownership interest for
each listed parent company as of
December 31 of the reporting year.
(i) For reporting the United States
parent company(s) and their
percentage(s) of ownership interest,
follow these instructions:
(A) If the reporting entity is entirely
owned by a single United States
company that is not owned by another
company, provide that company’s legal
name and physical address as the
United States parent company and
report 100 percent ownership.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18467
(B) If the reporting entity is entirely
owned by a single United States
company that is, itself, owned by
another company (e.g., it is a division or
subsidiary of a higher-level company),
provide the legal name and physical
address of the highest-level company in
the ownership hierarchy as the United
States parent company and report 100
percent ownership.
(C) If the reporting entity is owned by
more than one United States company
(e.g., company A owns 40 percent,
company B owns 35 percent, and
company C owns 25 percent), provide
the legal names and physical addresses
of all the companies with an ownership
interest as the United States parent
companies and report the percent
ownership of each.
(D) If the reporting entity is owned by
a joint venture or a cooperative, the joint
venture or cooperative is its own U.S.
parent company. Provide the legal name
and physical address of the joint
venture or cooperative as the United
States parent company, and report 100
percent ownership by the joint venture
or cooperative.
(E) If the reporting entity is entirely
owned by a foreign company, provide
the legal name and physical address of
the foreign company’s highest-level
company based in the United States as
the United States parent company, and
report 100 percent ownership.
(F) If the reporting entity is partially
owned by a foreign company, provide
the legal name and physical address of
the foreign company’s highest-level
company based in the United States,
along with the legal names and physical
addresses of all the other companies
with an ownership interest, as United
States parent companies, and report the
percent ownership of each of these
companies.
(G) If you are reporting for a federally
owned facility, report ‘‘U.S.
Government’’ and do not report physical
address or percent ownership.
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 98.6 is amended by adding
definitions of ‘‘Cogeneration unit’’,
‘‘North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code(s)’’, ‘‘Physical
address’’, and ‘‘United States parent
company(s)’’ in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
§ 98.6
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Cogeneration unit means a unit that
produces electrical energy and useful
thermal energy for industrial,
commercial, or heating or cooling
purposes, through the sequential or
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18468
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 69 / Monday, April 12, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
simultaneous use of the original fuel
energy.
*
*
*
*
*
North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code(s)
means the six-digit code(s) that
represents the product(s)/activity(s)/
service(s) at a facility or supplier as
defined in ‘‘North American Industrial
Classification System Manual 2007,’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Apr 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
available from the U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Technical
Information Service.
*
*
*
*
*
Physical address, with respect to a
United States parent company as
defined in this section, means the street
address, city, State and zip code of that
company’s physical location.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
United States parent company(s)
mean the highest-level United States
company(s) with an ownership interest
in the reporting entity as of December
31 of the reporting year.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–6765 Filed 4–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 69 (Monday, April 12, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18455-18468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6765]
[[Page 18455]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 98
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925; FRL-9130-6]
RIN 2060-AQ02
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to amend the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
Reporting Rule, to require reporters subject to the rule to provide:
The name, address, and ownership status of their U.S. parent company;
their primary and all other applicable North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code(s); and an indication of whether or
not any of their reported emissions are from a cogeneration unit. The
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule requires greenhouse gas emitting
facilities and suppliers of fuels and industrial gases from all sectors
of the economy to report their greenhouse gas emissions and to provide
certain additional supporting data in annual reports submitted to EPA.
DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before June 11, 2010.
Public Hearing. EPA does not plan to conduct a public hearing
unless requested. To request a hearing, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by April 19,
2010. If requested, the public hearing will be conducted on or about
April 19, 2010 in the Washington, DC area. EPA will provide further
information about the hearing on its webpage if a hearing is requested.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2009-0925, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRule amendment making Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: GHGReportingCPNAICS@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-1741.
Mail: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), Mailcode 2822T, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand/Courier Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading
Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20004, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0925, GHG Reporting Corporate Parent and NAICS Code. EPA's policy
is that all comments received will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-
mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/
DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carole Cook, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC-6207J), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 343-9263; fax number: (202) 343-2342; e-mail address:
GHGMRR@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional Information on Submitting
Comments: To expedite review of your comments by Agency staff, you are
encouraged to send a separate copy of your comments, in addition to the
copy you submit to the official docket, to Carole Cook, U.S. EPA,
Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, Mail Code
6207-J, Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 343-9263, e-mail
GHGReportingCPNAICS@epa.gov.
Regulated Entities. This proposed amendment to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule would affect facilities that are direct emitters of
GHGs, and suppliers of fuels and industrial gases, that are already
subject to the rule. Regulated categories and entities would include
those listed in Table 1 of this preamble:
Table 1--Examples of Regulated Entities by Category
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of
Category NAICS code regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Stationary Fuel ............... Facilities operating
Combustion Sources. boilers, process
heaters,
incinerators,
turbines, and
internal combustion
engines:
211 Extractors of crude
petroleum and
natural gas.
321 Manufacturers of
lumber and wood
products.
322 Pulp and paper
mills.
325 Chemical
manufacturers.
324 Petroleum refineries
and manufacturers
of coal products.
316, 326, 339 Manufacturers of
rubber and
miscellaneous
plastic products.
[[Page 18456]]
331 Steel works, blast
furnaces.
332 Electroplating,
plating, polishing,
anodizing, and
coloring.
336 Manufacturers of
motor vehicle parts
and accessories.
221 Electric, gas, and
sanitary services.
622 Health services.
611 Educational
services.
Electricity Generation........... 221112 Fossil-fuel fired
electric generating
units, including
units owned by
Federal and
municipal
governments and
units located in
Indian Country.
Adipic Acid Production........... 325199 Adipic acid
manufacturing
facilities.
Aluminum Production.............. 331312 Primary Aluminum
production
facilities.
Ammonia Manufacturing............ 325311 Anhydrous and
aqueous ammonia
manufacturing
facilities.
Cement Production................ 327310 Portland Cement
manufacturing
plants.
Ferroalloy Production............ 331112 Ferroalloys
manufacturing
facilities.
Glass Production................. 327211 Flat glass
manufacturing
facilities.
327213 Glass container
manufacturing
facilities.
327212 Other pressed and
blown glass and
glassware
manufacturing
facilities.
HCFC-22 Production and HFC-23 325120 Chlorodifluoromethan
Destruction. e manufacturing
facilities.
Hydrogen Production.............. 325120 Hydrogen
manufacturing
facilities.
Iron and Steel Production........ 331111 Integrated iron and
steel mills, steel
companies, sinter
plants, blast
furnaces, basic
oxygen process
furnace shops.
Lead Production.................. 331419 Primary lead
smelting and
refining
facilities.
331492 Secondary lead
smelting and
refining
facilities.
Lime Production.................. 327410 Calcium oxide,
calcium hydroxide,
dolomitic hydrates
manufacturing
facilities.
Nitric Acid Production........... 325311 Nitric acid
manufacturing
facilities.
Petrochemical Production......... 32511 Ethylene dichloride
manufacturing
facilities.
325199 Acrylonitrile,
ethylene oxide,
methanol
manufacturing
facilities.
325110 Ethylene
manufacturing
facilities.
325182 Carbon black
manufacturing
facilities.
Petroleum Refineries............. 324110 Petroleum
refineries.
Phosphoric Acid Production....... 325312 Phosphoric acid
manufacturing
facilities.
Pulp and Paper Manufacturing..... 322110 Pulp mills.
322121 Paper mills.
322130 Paperboard mills.
Silicon Carbide Production....... 327910 Silicon carbide
abrasives
manufacturing
facilities.
Soda Ash Manufacturing........... 325181 Alkalies and
chlorine
manufacturing
facilities.
212391 Soda ash, natural,
mining and/or
beneficiation.
Titanium Dioxide Production...... 325188 Titanium dioxide
manufacturing
facilities.
Zinc Production.................. 331419 Primary zinc
refining
facilities.
331492 Zinc dust reclaiming
facilities,
recovering from
scrap and/or
alloying purchased
metals.
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.. 562212 Solid waste
landfills.
221320 Sewage treatment
facilities.
Manure\1\ Management............. 112111 Beef cattle
feedlots.
112120 Dairy cattle and
milk production
facilities.
112210 Hog and pig farms.
112310 Chicken egg
production
facilities.
112330 Turkey Production.
112320 Broilers and Other
Meat type Chicken
Production.
Suppliers of Coal Based Liquids 211111 Coal liquefaction at
Fuels. mine sites.
Suppliers of Petroleum Products.. 324110 Petroleum
refineries.
Suppliers of Natural Gas and NGLs 221210 Natural gas
distribution
facilities.
211112 Natural gas liquid
extraction
facilities.
Suppliers of Industrial GHGs..... 325120 Industrial gas
manufacturing
facilities.
Suppliers of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 325120 Industrial gas
manufacturing
facilities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA is not implementing subpart JJ of the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule due to a Congressional restriction prohibiting the expenditure of
funds for this purpose.
Table 1 of this preamble is not intended to be exhaustive, but
rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. Table 1 lists the types of entities that EPA
currently is aware of that could be potentially affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
subject to reporting requirements. To determine whether an entity is
affected by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability
criteria found in 40 CFR part 98, subpart A. If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Acronyms and Abbreviations. The following acronyms and
abbreviations are used in this document.
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFC chlorofluorocarbon
[[Page 18457]]
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e CO2-equivalent
CUSIP Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures
DUNS Data Universal Numbering System
eGRID Generation Resource Integrated Database
EO Executive Order
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FEIN Federal Employee Identification Numbers
GHG greenhouse gas
HCFC hydrochlorofluorocarbon
HFC hydrofluorocarbon
HFE hydrofluoroether
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
ICR Information Collection Request
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NIH National Institutes of Health
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RCRAInfo Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RGGI Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
SBREFA Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SIC Standard Industrial Classification
TCR The Climate Registry
TRI Toxics Release Inventory
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
U.S. United States
WCI Western Climate Initiative
WRI World Resources Institute
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Background on Proposed Rule Amendment
B. Summary of the Proposed Rule Amendment
C. Legal Authority
D. Relationship to Other Programs
1. EPA and Other Federal Data Collection Programs
2. Non-Federal Data Collection Programs
II. Proposed Rule Amendment and Rationale
A. U.S. Parent Company
B. NAICS Code
C. Cogeneration
D. Frequency of Reporting
E. Applicability
F. Request for Comment
III. Economic Impacts of the Proposed Rule Amendment
A. How were compliance costs estimated?
B. What are the costs of the rule?
C. What are the economic impacts of the rule?
D. What are the impacts of the rule on small businesses?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. Background
A. Background on Proposed Rule Amendment
The Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, published on October 30, 2009 (74
FR 56260), requires reporting by facilities that emit GHGs
(``facilities'') and by suppliers of fuels and industrial gases
(``suppliers''). Facilities and suppliers that meet the applicability
criteria in subpart A of 40 CFR part 98 (``regulated entities'' or
``reporters'') must submit annual GHG reports.\2\ A list of the
information that all reporters must submit in their annual reports is
included in the general provisions of the rule (see 40 CFR 98.3(c)).
This list includes owner/operator identification information, but does
not currently require reporters to provide information on their U.S.
parent company, on their primary and other applicable NAICS code(s), or
on whether any of their reported emissions are from a cogeneration
unit. In this notice, EPA proposes amendments to the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule that would require facilities and suppliers subject to
the rule to provide this additional information in their annual
reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Because they are not covered under 40 CFR part 98, this rule
does not apply to mobile sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This preamble is divided into four sections. The first section of
the preamble provides background and an overview of the proposed rule
amendment, discusses EPA's legal authority under the Clean Air Act
(CAA) for collecting the proposed additional information and describes
the relationship between this information and the information already
collected by other Federal, regional, and State reporting programs. The
second section of the preamble states the proposed rule requirements
and summarizes the rationale for requiring facilities and suppliers
subject to the rule to report this additional information on an annual
basis. This section also includes a summary of issues associated with
the proposed rule amendment upon which EPA is particularly interested
in receiving comment. The third section of the preamble provides a
summary of the impacts and costs of the proposed rule amendment. The
fourth and final section of the preamble discusses the various
statutory and executive order requirements applicable to the proposed
rule amendment.
B. Summary of the Proposed Rule Amendment
EPA is proposing to add three data elements to the list of data
elements specified in 40 CFR 98.3. These data elements would be
included in the annual GHG reports that facilities and suppliers
subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule are required to submit.
Specifically, this proposed rule amendment would require each reporter
to (1) provide the legal name and physical address of its highest-level
U.S. parent company and to indicate its ownership status by selecting
from a list of codes provided by EPA; \3\ (2) provide its primary and
other applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code(s); and (3) indicate whether any of its reported emissions are
from a cogeneration unit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This information would not be required if, upon finalization
of this rule amendment, EPA decides to require reporters to list all
of their U.S. parent companies and their respective percentages of
ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule amendment applies to all facilities and
suppliers required to report under 40 CFR part 98, published on October
30, 2009 (74 FR 56260).\4\ Therefore, all facilities and suppliers that
meet the applicability criteria in 40 CFR part 98, subpart A would be
required to report the additional data elements included in this
proposal.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ If additional categories are proposed and finalized in 40
CFR part 98, then this rule amendment would apply to those
categories as well.
\5\ EPA is not implementing subpart JJ of the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule due to a Congressional restriction prohibiting the
expenditure of funds for this purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Legal Authority
EPA is proposing this rule amendment under the existing authority
provided in CAA section 114. As noted in the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule, CAA section 114 provides EPA with broad authority to require the
information mandated by this proposed rule amendment because such
information will inform EPA's implementation of various CAA provisions
(74 FR 66264). Under CAA section 114(a)(1), the Administrator may
require emission sources, persons subject to the CAA, manufacturers of
emission control or process equipment,
[[Page 18458]]
or persons whom the Administrator believes may have necessary
information, to monitor and report emissions and to provide such other
information as the Administrator requests for the purposes of carrying
out any provision of the CAA (except for a provision of title II with
respect to motor vehicles).
As discussed in greater detail in the response to comments for the
final Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule, EPA may gather information for a
variety of purposes, including for the purpose of assisting in the
development of emissions standards under CAA section 111, determining
compliance with implementation plans or standards, or more broadly for
``carrying out any provision'' of the CAA. Section 103 of the CAA
authorizes EPA to establish a national research and development
program, including nonregulatory approaches and technologies, for the
prevention and control of air pollution, including greenhouse gases.
The data collected under this proposed rule amendment could inform
EPA's implementation of section 103(g) of the CAA regarding
improvements in sector based nonregulatory strategies and technologies
for preventing or reducing air pollutants.
In addition, corporate parent and NAICS code data could assist EPA
in developing and improving air pollution emission inventories. A more
detailed understanding of the sources and operational categories of GHG
emissions could lead to improvements in air pollution emissions
information that is relied upon to develop effective control methods.
The additional information may also inform regulatory strategies being
evaluated by EPA.
Given the broad scope of CAA section 114, it is appropriate for EPA
to gather the information required by this proposed rule amendment
because such information is relevant to EPA's carrying out a wide
variety of CAA provisions.
D. Relationship to Other Programs
This section of the preamble discusses other Federal and non-
Federal reporting programs that collect information similar to the
information that EPA would collect under this proposed rule amendment.
Although considerable information on GHG emitting industrial facilities
and on suppliers of fuel and industrial gas is already collected by
EPA, other Federal and State agencies, and private and nonprofit
organizations, no other source of information meets all of the
objectives that EPA has set out for this proposed rulemaking.
Specifically, no other reporting program meets all of the following
criteria: Identifies each reporter's highest-level U.S. parent company;
identifies each reporter's primary and all other applicable NAICS
codes; includes information on cogeneration; covers all reporters to
the Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting Rule; is collected annually; and
is available to EPA.
This section of the preamble reviews the data collected under other
reporting programs and compares those data with the data that would be
collected under this proposed rule amendment. Section II of the
preamble (Proposed Rule Amendment and Rationale) compares the specific
definitions that EPA is proposing to use for U.S. parent company, NAICS
code, and cogeneration unit, for purposes of this rule amendment, with
the definitions used by other Federal and non-Federal programs, and
explains why we have selected the particular definitions that are used
here.
1. EPA and Other Federal Data Collection Programs U.S. Parent Company
Currently, three EPA programs collect parent company information:
The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) under Section 313 of the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act; Risk Management Plans under
Section 212(r) of the Clean Air Act; and the Inventory Update Rule
under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Of these three programs,
TRI is the only one that requires reporters to submit information on
their highest-level U.S. parent company.\6\ TRI requires the parent's
name and Dun & Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) \7\
identifier to be reported annually. EPA estimates that approximately
two-thirds of the reporters to the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule are
also required to report to TRI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For purposes of TRI Form R, a reporter's parent company is
defined as the highest-level company, located in the United States
that directly owns at least 50 percent of the voting stock of the
company (Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Forms and
Instructions, EPA 260-R-09-006, October 2009, page 34).
\7\ The Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) is a unique 9-
digit numerical identifier used to identify individual business
entities in databases maintained by Dun & Bradstreet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risk Management Plans under CAA section 212(r) are required to
include information on ``parent company.'' \8\ However, the parent
company reported in a Risk Management Plan is not necessarily the
highest-level U.S. parent company. Risk Management Plans are generally
submitted only once every five years, but must be updated when a
chemical accident occurs at a facility. The Inventory Update Rule under
TSCA requires reporting of both the production facility where a
specific chemical is produced and the corporate unit responsible for
the production or importation of the chemical. However, reporters are
not required to identify the highest-level U.S. parent company and the
program does not define ``company.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ EPA's guidance for Risk Management Plans states ``Your
parent company is the corporation or other business entity that owns
at least 50 percent of the voting stock of your company. If you are
owned by a joint venture, enter the first of your two major owners
here. If your company does not have a parent company, leave this
data element blank.'' Risk Management Plan Guidance, https://www.epa.gov/emergencies/docs/chem/RMPeSubmit_users_manual.pdf#page=33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several EPA programs under the CAA, including the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule, require reporters to identify the ``owner or operator''
of each affected facility. In these programs, ``owner'' \9\ refers to
the person or legal entity that owns the facility and its productive
infrastructure. ``Operator'' \10\ refers to the legal entity that
controls day-to-day operations. Under some regulatory and reporting
programs, ``operator'' refers specifically to the plant or site
manager. Although in some cases, the owner or operator is also the
highest-level U.S. parent company, the information currently collected
under the majority of CAA programs is not designed to specifically
identify the highest-level U.S. parent company or to provide insight
into the corporate ownership structure because that information is not
necessary to determine compliance with particular regulatory
requirements. EPA does generate information on the highest-level U.S.
parent company of electric generating facilities in its Emissions and
Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). However, these parent
company data are based on ownership information reported to the Energy
Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, and on
internal EPA research. eGRID contains U.S. parent company data for
approximately 5,000 electric generating facilities, of which
approximately 2,000
[[Page 18459]]
are projected to be subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Under 40 CFR 98.6, ``owner'' means any person who has a
legal or equitable title to, has a leasehold interest in, or control
of a facility or supplier, except a person whose legal or equitable
title to or leasehold interest in the facility or supplier arises
solely because the person is a limited partner in a partnership that
has legal or equitable title to, has a leasehold interest in, or
control of the facility or supplier shall not be considered an
``owner'' of the facility or supplier.
\10\ Under 40 CFR 98.6, ``Operator'' means any person who
operates or supervises a facility or supplier.
\11\ Of the approximately 3,000 electric generating facilities
that are not projected to be subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting
Rule, about half do not combust any fossil fuel (e.g., they utilize
hydro, nuclear, wind or solar power) and the other half emit or are
expected to emit less than 25,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. The
approximately 2,000 electric generating facilities that are
projected to be subject to the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule account
for 99.7% of the total GHG emissions from all electric generators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary and Other NAICS Codes
In addition to collecting information on reporters' U.S. parent
companies, this proposed rule amendment would require facilities and
suppliers reporting under the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule to report
their primary and other applicable NAICS codes.\12\ This information is
useful for benchmarking the environmental performance of companies and
facilities relative to others in their sector. Among all EPA programs,
only TRI requires reporters to submit primary NAICS codes as well as
other relevant NAICS codes. As noted above, EPA estimates that
approximately two-thirds of the reporters under the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule are also required to report to TRI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ A reporter's primary North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) code is defined as the six-digit NAICS
code that represents the reporter's primary product/activity/service
as defined in ``North American Industrial Classification System
Manual 2007,'' available from the U.S. Department of Commerce,
National Technical Information Service. All other NAICS codes
relating to product(s)/activity(s)/service(s) which provide economic
profit (but which are not related to the principal source of
revenue) are additional NAICS codes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA does collect NAICS code information through routine compliance
reporting in multiple programs, but those data are not complete. The
air compliance data contained in the Air Facilities System and the
water compliance data contained in the Permit Compliance System both
include primary NAICS codes, but not other relevant NAICS codes.
Conversely, the compliance data for hazardous waste management
contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database
(RCRAInfo) include multiple NAICS codes for facilities with more than
one relevant code, but do not identify the primary NAICS code. The
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS), which houses a variety
of enforcement records, also includes NAICS codes, but does not explain
how these codes are derived. In addition, none of the compliance
databases provide complete coverage of the facilities subject to the
Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule.
Cogeneration
There are currently no EPA programs that require facilities or
suppliers to report the use of cogeneration units. EPA's Combined Heat
and Power Partnership, a voluntary program created in 2001, requires
that Partners complete a Letter of Intent stating that they agree to
provide data on existing combined heat and power (also known as
cogeneration) projects and on new project development to help EPA
determine climate benefits.\13\ However, this is a voluntary program
and does not provide coverage of all cogeneration units. The Energy
Information Administration does collect information on cogeneration
from utility and non-utility power generators greater than 1 megawatt
(MW).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ https://www.epa.gov/chp.
\14\ EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860.html: and,
EIA-861, Annual Electric Power Industry Report https://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia861.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Non-Federal Data Collection Programs
EPA is aware of a number of State, regional, and international GHG
reporting programs that are in place or under development. In
developing this proposed rule amendment, EPA reviewed 18 State
programs. A summary of these State programs may be found in the docket
at EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925. EPA also reviewed four other reporting
initiatives or protocols: The Climate Registry (TCR), the World
Resources Institute (WRI) Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), and the Western Climate Initiative
(WCI). In reviewing these GHG reporting programs, EPA considered
whether they contain information on U.S. parent company, NAICS code(s),
or cogeneration that is comparable in coverage (of facilities and
suppliers), specific information collected, data quality and
timeliness, to what would be required under this proposed rule
amendment. EPA also considered whether the Agency had access to the
data collected under these programs.
In general, EPA found that the data collected under State and other
non-Federal data collection programs are designed to serve the specific
purposes of those programs and do not appear to meet the objectives of
this proposed rule amendment.
U.S. Parent Company
EPA identified two State programs--those in California and
Delaware--that require reporting of parent company information. The
Climate Registry and WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol also encourage
reporters to list their parent company on a voluntary basis but do not
require this information. The Climate Registry and WRI Greenhouse Gas
Protocol encourage participating organizations to report their GHG
emissions at the highest organizational level (e.g., corporate level),
and that the organization account for all emissions sources. RGGI
collects information on corporate associations from those organizations
that submit bids in its annual GHG allowance auctions. Additional
information on the collection of corporate and/or parent company
information by California, Delaware, TCR, WCI, and RGGI, as well as on
the WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol, may be found in the docket at EPA-HQ-
OAR-2009-0925.
Primary and Other NAICS Codes
All of the State programs require reporting of either the NAICS
codes or Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes. The Western
Climate Initiative is the only regional reporting program that requires
reporters to submit their NAICS codes as part of their annual report.
Cogeneration
Most State reporting programs do not require separate reporting of
cogeneration emissions or notification regarding the operation of
cogeneration units. RGGI does not require any additional reporting for
cogeneration units. WCI requires limited information on type of unit
and thermal output.15 16 However, WCI is considering
including separate reporting requirements for cogeneration units.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: Final Model Rule,
December 31, 2008 (https://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/
component/remository/Reporting-Committee-Documents/Draft-Essential-
Requirements-for-Mandatory-Reporting--Final-Draft-(May-7&-2009)/
orderby,4/page,1/).
\16\ Western Climate Initiative: Final Essential Requirements
for Mandatory Reporting--July 15, 2009 (https://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/func-startdown/118/).
\17\ Western Climate Initiative: Background Document and
Progress Report for Essential Requirements of Mandatory Reporting
for the Western Climate Initiative, January 6, 2009 (https://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/func-startdown/74/).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the State programs that require cogeneration reporting, the
California and New Mexico programs have the most extensive reporting
requirements. For these programs, reporters with a cogeneration unit
must report detailed information on the type of unit; the amount of
electricity generated; the amount of thermal energy produced; the
amount of electricity and thermal energy used on site, sold to a
distributer,
[[Page 18460]]
or provided directly to another company; the total GHG emissions for
the unit; the GHG emissions allocated to thermal energy output; and the
GHG emissions allocated to electricity generation. The California
reporting rule also requires the amount of supplemental fuel consumed
by duct burners for heat recovery steam generators.18 19
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section 95112.
\19\ New Mexico Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Emissions Reporting:
Emissions Quantification Procedures for 20.2.73 NMAC and 20.2.87
NMAC, Emissions Year 2009. https://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/ghg/documents/NM_GHGEI_quantif_procedures_2009.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although reporting of cogeneration is not required by TCR,
reporters are encouraged to report emissions at the unit level and to
allocate emissions between electric and thermal energy outputs for
cogeneration units.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Climate Registry: General Reporting Protocol, Version
1.1, May 2008 (https://www.theclimateregistry.org).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposed Rule Amendment and Rationale
This section of the preamble explains the requirements of the
proposed rule amendment as well as the rationale for EPA's proposal for
collecting the additional data elements summarized in Section I.B. of
this preamble.
This proposed rule amendment would provide information useful to
EPA in carrying out a number of potential nonregulatory and regulatory
efforts authorized under the CAA, including informing the development
of future climate change strategies. For example, through data
collected under this proposed rule amendment, EPA would gain a better
understanding of the aggregate GHG emissions of corporations and
specific industry sectors.
A. U.S. Parent Company
Although the proposed rule language includes the requirements for
only one option (i.e., Option 2 below), EPA is proposing two options
for collecting U.S. parent company information:
Option 1
EPA is proposing to require all facilities and suppliers subject to
the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 98) to provide the legal
name and physical address of their U.S. parent company. Under this
option, a reporter's U.S. parent company is defined as the highest-
level company, located in the United States, and with the largest
ownership interest in the reporting entity as of December 31 of the
reporting year. The U.S. parent company's physical address is defined
as the street address, city, state and zip code of the U.S. parent
company's physical location.
Each reporter would also be required to indicate one of the
following with respect to its ownership status:
``S''--single ownership (the reporting entity is entirely
owned by a single company which is not owned by any other company,
e.g., it is not a subsidiary or division of another company).
``W''--wholly owned (the reporting entity is entirely
owned by a single company which is, itself, owned by another company,
e.g., it is a subsidiary or division of another company).
``M''--multiple owners (the reporting entity is owned by
more than one company).\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ This information, ``S'', ``W'' and ``M'' would not be
required under Option 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option 2
EPA is also proposing that reporters list the names and physical
addresses of all of their U.S. parent companies and their respective
percentages of ownership. Under Option 2, EPA proposes to define U.S.
parent company(s) as the highest-level U.S. company(s) with an
ownership interest in the reporting entity as of December 31 of the
reporting year. The physical address of a U.S. parent company is
defined as the street address, city, state and zip code of the U.S.
parent company's physical location.
With this option EPA recognizes that some facilities and suppliers
may be owned by multiple companies and seeks to gather a more complete
picture of the ownership status for each reporter. Facilities and
suppliers would be required to report all of their U.S. parent
companies regardless of the percentage of their ownership stake. Note
that this option would not necessarily ask for all of the owners in an
individual reporter's corporate structure, just the highest-level
parent companies. If a facility or supplier has only one parent
company, that company should be reported at 100 percent.
Reporting all U.S. parent companies by their percentage of
ownership would provide EPA with a more complete picture of a
facility's or supplier's parent companies rather than having
information solely on the parent company with the largest ownership
interest. This option would provide EPA with a more complete data set.
EPA is proposing to provide the following instruction to reporters
on how to report the U.S. parent company(s) data element under options
1 and 2 as described above:
Each reporter must provide the legal name(s) and physical
address(es) of their U.S. parent company(s). Table 2 of this preamble
provides examples along with additional instruction to assist with the
determination of a reporter's U.S. parent company(s):
Table 2--Proposed Instruction for Reporters on How To Report U.S. Parent
Company(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How to report U.S. How to report U.S.
Reporting scenario parent company under parent company under
Option 1 Option 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reporting entity is Provide that Provide that
entirely owned by a single company's legal company's legal
U.S. company that is not name and physical name and physical
owned by any other company address as the U.S. address as the U.S.
(e.g., it is not a parent company. parent company.
subsidiary or division of Mark ``S'' for Enter 100% as the
another company). Single Ownership in percent ownership
the associated box.
The reporting entity is Provide the legal Provide the legal
entirely owned by a single name and physical name and physical
U.S. company which is, address of the address of the
itself, owned by another highest-level highest-level
company (e.g., it is a company in the company in the
division or subsidiary of a ownership hierarchy ownership hierarchy
higher-level company). as the U.S. parent as the U.S. parent
company. Mark ``W'' company. Enter 100%
for Wholly Owned in as the percent
the associated box. ownership.
The reporting entity is Provide the legal Provide the legal
owned by more than one U.S. name and physical names and physical
company (e.g., company A address of the addresses of all of
owns 40%, company B owns company with the the companies with
35% and company C owns 25%). largest ownership an ownership
interest as the interest as U.S.
U.S. parent parent companies.
company. Mark ``M'' Enter the percent
for Multiple Owners. ownership of each
company.
[[Page 18461]]
The reporting entity is Provide the legal Provide the legal
entirely owned by a foreign name and physical name and physical
company. address of the address of the
foreign company's foreign company's
highest-level highest-level
company based in company based in
the U.S. as the the U.S. as the
U.S. parent U.S. parent
company. Mark ``W'' company. Enter 100%
for Wholly Owned in as the percent
the associated box. ownership.
The reporting entity is (1) If the reporting Provide the legal
partially owned by a entity is not name and physical
foreign company. entirely owned by address of the
the foreign foreign entity's
company, but the highest-level
foreign company has company based in
the largest the U.S., along
ownership interest, with the legal
then provide the names and physical
legal name and addresses of all
physical address of the other companies
the foreign with an ownership
company's highest- interest, as U.S.
level company based parent companies.
in the U.S. as the Enter the percent
U.S. parent ownership of each
company. Mark ``M'' company.
for Multiple Owners
in the associated
box.
(2) If the foreign
company does not
have the largest
ownership interest
in the reporting
entity, then
provide the name
and physical
address of the
company with the
largest ownership
interest as the
U.S. parent
company. Mark ``M''
for Multiple Owners
in the associated
box.
The reporting entity is The joint venture or The joint venture or
owned by a joint venture or cooperative is its cooperative is its
cooperative. own U.S. parent own U.S. parent
company. Provide company. Provide
the joint venture the joint venture
or cooperative's or cooperative's
legal name and legal name and
physical address as physical address as
the U.S. parent the U.S. parent
company. Mark ``W'' company. Enter 100%
for Wholly Owned in as the percent
the associated box. ownership.
The reporting entity is a Enter U.S. Enter U.S.
Federally-owned facility. Government, and Government, and
leave the address leave the address
field and ownership and percent
box blank. ownership fields
blank.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA may issue additional guidance for reporters after this proposed
rule amendment is finalized.
The proposed definition of U.S. parent company used in this
proposed rule amendment is similar to that used in the TRI program.
However, to improve data quality, EPA is proposing to slightly modify
the definition of the U.S. parent company used in the TRI program for
the purposes of this proposed rule amendment. EPA is proposing to
adjust the ownership criteria used in the TRI definition of U.S. parent
company from over 50 percent of voting stock to largest ownership
interest in the company for the purpose of this action only. EPA is not
proposing to alter the definition used for the TRI program. In
reviewing TRI data, EPA has determined that the TRI definition may
result in incomplete information in situations where a company has
multiple owners, but no one company owns over 50 percent.
In addition, EPA reviewed how corporations and/or parent companies
are defined in the WRI Greenhouse Gas Protocol, TCR, and RGGI to
determine if some or all of the definitions could be applied to this
proposed rule amendment. Neither WRI, TCR, nor RGGI have a definition
of U.S. parent company, and after a review of the programs, EPA
determined that the definitions of corporation (and similar terminology
depending on the program) are not appropriate for this proposed rule
amendment. For a summary of this analysis please see the docket at EPA-
HQ-OAR-2009-0925.
Rationale
The purpose of collecting the name and physical address of the U.S.
parent company(s) on the annual reporting form for the Mandatory GHG
Reporting Rule is to assist in aggregating facility-based GHG emissions
data to the corporate level. This additional data element would allow
EPA to compile more comprehensive information on corporate GHG
emissions and conduct a variety of analyses. EPA received some comments
on the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule from various entities supporting
the collection of parent company data and emphasizing the importance of
being able to aggregate the data to the corporate level. For example,
one commenter stated that ``Company identification is a critical
requirement for * * * understanding the impact, risks, and
opportunities * * * due to climate change.'' \22\ Another commenter
stated, ``That the EPA [should] add a requirement that facilities
subject to reporting under the proposed rule clearly identify their
parent company and the proportion of the facility the parent/holding
company owns. Without this information it is very difficult to
consolidate facility level data to company level data * * *'' \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Comment Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508-0415.1.
\23\ Comment Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508-0984.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA recognizes that data aggregated at the corporate level would
likely be incomplete because the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule requires
reporting of only those emissions for which calculation methods are
provided in the rule and, for certain source categories, requires
reporting only from those facilities and suppliers whose emissions are
above specified thresholds. In other words, corporate-level data might
be incomplete, because 40 CFR part 98 does not cover all GHG emissions
from every source, and some facilities and operations within a company
may not be required to report their GHG emissions.
However, collecting information on U.S. parent company(s) would
augment and complement the facility-level GHG emission data currently
collected under the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule and would not be
repetitive of information already collected in the rule. In addition,
the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule covers approximately 85 percent of
U.S. GHG emissions, therefore the data
[[Page 18462]]
collected under this proposed rule amendment would be useful.
Under Option 1, each reporter would report the legal name and
physical address of their highest-level U.S. parent company and would
select from a list of three possible ownership structures, selecting
the type of ownership that best describes the ownership structure for
the facility or supplier. Using this approach, EPA would collect
information on whether a facility or supplier is owned by a single
entity or multiple entities. Option 1 would enable EPA to collect
additional data on the ownership structure of a facility or supplier,
which would allow (with additional research) a more complete picture of
a facility's or supplier's GHG emissions among U.S. parent companies,
without requiring facilities to list all of their owners.
Under Option 2, facilities and suppliers would report the legal
names and physical addresses of all their U.S. parent companies
together with each U.S. parent company's percentage of ownership. The
advantage of this option is that it would provide EPA with a more
complete picture of a facility's or supplier's parent companies rather
than having information on solely the parent company with the largest
ownership interest.
Other Data Element Considered
EPA considered adding a requirement to this proposed rule amendment
to report a numeric corporate identifier derived from a database that
would verify the facility-parent company linkage. EPA considered both
private and public sources of facility-parent company identifiers
including the following: Dun & Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Central Index
Key, Stock Tickers, Committee on Uniform Security Identification
Procedures (CUSIP), Federal Employee Identification Numbers (FEIN),
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Electronic Research Administration,
and LexisNexis. For a summary of these corporate identifiers please see
the docket at EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0925. EPA decided not to propose a
numeric identifier because none of the options considered meet the
Agency's data needs. The privately held databases such as Dun &
Bradstreet DUNS and CUSIP require a licensing agreement with the
Agency, which potentially restricts the use of the data. In addition,
users outside of EPA would need to purchase a license to use the
numeric identifier data element. Several of the options considered,
such as stock tickers, CUSIP, SEC central index key, and LexisNexis
only cover public corporations. The Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule covers
both private and public corporations. In accordance with Internal
Revenue Code 6103, FEINs can only be collected and released on a
voluntary basis and EPA would have no method for evaluating the quality
of the information. Accordingly we are not proposing a corporate
numeric identifier.
B. NAICS Code
In addition to collecting information on each reporter's U.S.
parent company(s), this proposed rule amendment would require each
facility or supplier reporting under the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule
to report its primary NAICS code and any other NAICS codes applicable
to its facility. This information is useful because it would provide an
additional data element that can assist EPA to further aggregate and
analyze the data collected under the Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule at
the sector level.
For the purposes of this proposed rule amendment, EPA is proposing
to define a reporter's primary North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code as the six-digit code that represents the
reporter's primary product/activity/service at the facility, as defined
in ``North American Industry Classification System Manual 2007,''
available from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical
Information Service. The primary NAICS code is the principal source of
revenue. EPA is proposing to define additional NAICS codes as those
codes that correspond to product(s)/activity(s)/service(s) that provide
economic profit, but that are not related to the principal source of
revenue. EPA consider