Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: The U.S./Afghanistan Professional Partnership Program, 18005-18012 [2010-7979]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
Applicants should refer to the Bureau’s
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy
Guidelines in the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI).
V.2f. Follow-on Activities: Applicants
should provide a plan to conduct
activities after the Bureau-funded
project has concluded in order to ensure
that Bureau-supported programs are not
isolated events. Funds for all post-grant
activities must be in the form of
contributions from the applicant or
sources outside of the Bureau. Costs for
these activities must not appear in the
proposal budget, but should be outlined
in the narrative.
V.2g. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals should include a
detailed plan to monitor and evaluate
the program. Program objectives should
target clearly defined results in
quantitative terms. Competitive
evaluation plans will describe how
applicant organizations would measure
these results, and proposals should
include draft data collection
instruments (surveys, questionnaires,
etc.) in Tab E.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices. Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive a Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application. Unsuccessful applicants
will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements. Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) guidance:
• Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
• Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments.’’
• Circular A–110 (Revised), ‘‘Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and other
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
• Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
• Circular A–133, Audits of States,
Local Government, and Non-profit
Organizations.
Please reference https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants_circulars/for additional
information:
VI.3. Reporting Requirements. You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one electronic copy of the
following reports:
VI.3a. Final Reports. A final program
and financial report no more than 90
days after the expiration of the award;
VI.3b. One-page Report. A concise,
one-page final program report
summarizing program outcomes no
more than 90 days after the expiration
of the award. This one-page report will
be transmitted to OMB, and be made
available to the public via OMB’s
USAspending.gov Web site—as part of
ECA’s Federal Funding Accountability
and Transparency Act (FFATA)
reporting requirements.
VI.3c. SF–PPR. A SF–PPR,
‘‘Performance Progress Report’’ Cover
Sheet should be submitted with all
program reports.
VI.3d. Quarterly reports. Quarterly
program and financial reports should be
submitted for the duration of the
program. For program reports, award
recipients will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau. (Please refer to
section IV.3.d.3, ‘‘Program Monitoring
and Evaluation’’). All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request. All reports
must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer
and ECA Program Officer listed in the
final assistance award document.
VI.4. Additional Program Data
Requirements:
VI.4a. Data on Program participants
and activities. Award recipients will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. At a minimum, the data must
include the following: Name, address,
contact information and biographic
sketch of all persons who travel
internationally on funds provided by
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18005
the agreement or who benefit from the
award funding but do not travel.
VI.4b. Travel. Itineraries of
international and domestic travel,
providing dates of travel and cities in
which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country
and U.S. activities must be received by
the ECA Program Officer at least three
work days prior to the official opening
of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Jim Ogul, Office
of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C, U.S.
Department of State, SA–5, 3rd Floor,
2200 C St., NW., Washington, DC
20522–0503, ph. tel: (202) 632–6055, email: ogulje@state.gov. All
correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C–
10–01.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.4
above.
Dated: March 31, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–7981 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6950]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: The U.S./Afghanistan
Professional Partnership Program
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/EUR–SCA–10–52.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 21, 2010.
Executive Summary: In his December
1, 2009, speech in West Point, New
York, President Obama said that a new
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
18006
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
diplomatic initiative in Afghanistan
would be part of the U.S. strategy to
bring peace and stability in the
Afghanistan/Pakistan region. As part of
this initiative, ECA is seeking proposals
for a new program, called ‘‘The U.S./
Afghanistan Professional Partnership
Program.’’ This program will bring
young professionals from the two
countries together to develop cross
cultural relationships and develop
professional skills that will positively
impact people’s lives and will result in
stronger ties between the two nations.
Pending availability of funds, the
Bureau expects to award one grant for
approximately $1,200,000. The project
is focused on professionals working in
the judicial system and public
administration and will be designed to
demonstrate best practices, offer
professional development opportunities,
and support internships at U.S-based
workplaces for Afghan professionals.
The program will involve provincial
and district (state, local) public
administration officials, district attorney
offices, legal aid offices, case workers,
and judges where possible.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ Funding for this competition
is provided through special FY 2009/FY
2010 supplemental funds that have been
appropriated to the Department of State.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
General Program Outlines
Language: This program is for English
and non-English speaking Afghan
participants. English language ability
will not be a requirement to participate.
Groups of Afghan professionals should
be arranged according to language
ability/preference (English and Dari).
For the Dari-speaking participants, State
Department Language Services
interpreters will be assigned through the
Office of Citizen Exchanges. There will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
be approximately three interpreters
assigned for the group orientation
portion of the program and about one
interpreter to three Afghan participants
for the internship portion of the
program. Proposals should budget for
the appropriate amount of interpreters.
See IV.3e.2c. for specifics on budgeting
for interpreters.
Visas: Applicants must demonstrate
that they can work with ECA and the
Public Affairs Section of the U.S.
Embassy in Kabul for the U.S. visas and
directly with the Afghan Embassy for its
visas (if necessary). ECA will issue the
DS–2019 forms required for J visas; see
Section IV.3d.1 for additional
information related to the
administration of J visa programs.
Travel: The grantee will arrange all
round-trip international travel,
complying with the Fly America Act,
and domestic travel arrangements for
the participants. All Afghan and
American participants must depart and
arrive in Afghanistan through Kabul.
Proposals should include plans to house
the Afghan participants in Kabul for at
least one day to coordinate predeparture and post program briefings
with the Public Affairs Staff of the U.S.
Embassy.
U.S. Based Programs: The recipients
of grant awards will be responsible for
implementing programs from four to six
weeks in the United States for the
Afghan participants. It is envisioned
that the Afghan participants will be
grouped in delegations of ten who will
travel together to the United States.
Each delegation of ten Afghan
participants will travel at different times
throughout the grant period. The Afghan
participants will be placed within
relevant, reputable, legally-recognized
U.S. organizations where they will gain
hands-on experience with legal and
public administration professions in the
United States, and will have the
opportunity to establish relationships
with U.S. professional counterparts for
on-going collaboration. The grantee may
want to engage with a partner or subgrantee to arrange for the internship
placement. The grantee should also
include cultural enrichment activities as
an integral part of the experience. Such
activities could include outings to
museums, historic sites, sporting events,
cultural exhibits, local schools or
community events, volunteering and
other opportunities to experience
American culture and diversity. Shortterm homestays to give participants a
personal experience of how typical
Americans live are highly desirable.
Afghanistan-Based Programs:
Proposals should also describe a
selection process and logistics for a one
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to two-week Afghanistan-based program
for a smaller number of U.S.
participants. The U.S. participants will
be selected from among the internship
host organizations for the Afghan
participants and will travel several
months after the Afghans return home.
The Afghanistan-based program may
include public presentations, joint skills
development programs, and media
interviews, if possible. All details and
specifics on Afghanistan-based
programs will be arranged in close
coordination with the Public Affairs
Section of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.
Note: Because of the changing nature of the
security situation, U.S. participants may not
be able to travel to Afghanistan. Therefore,
proposals should include a contingency plan
to bring U.S. and Afghan participants
together in a third country (preferably within
the South and Central Asia region) for this
program component. See VI.1b for additional
information on Assistance Awards in
Afghanistan.
Monitoring, Evaluation, and
Reporting: The Bureau places high
importance on monitoring and
evaluation as a means of ensuring and
measuring a project’s success. Proposals
must include a detailed monitoring and
evaluation plan that assesses the impact
of the project. Please refer to section
IV.3d.3. Project Monitoring and
Evaluation below.
Follow-up Activities: The grant
recipients will develop enhancement
activities that reinforce program goals
after the participants’ return to
Afghanistan. This includes informing
participants of the Bureau’s Alumni
program, facilitating their enrollment,
and encouraging their on-going
participation. Please refer to the PSI for
additional information on Alumni,
Outreach, and Engagement.
Fiscal Management: Applicants must
demonstrate competency to manage all
financial aspects of the project,
including participant costs and
transparent arrangements of sub-grant
relationships with partner
organizations, if applicable.
Contact ECA: All interested
organizations should contact ECA
Program Officer Brent Beemer before the
submission of proposals. ECA will also
put the organizations in contact with
appropriate colleagues at the U.S.
Embassy in Kabul. Brent Beemer: 202–
632–6067, BeemerBT@state.gov.
Specific Program Details
Professional Partnerships: The
Judicial System and Public
Administration.
This program will provide
approximately 100 participants from
Afghanistan and the United States the
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
opportunity to study the legal systems
and public administration techniques
and processes in both countries and for
Afghan professionals to take part in
internships with legal and public
administration professionals in the U.S.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
• Demonstrate Afghan and American
legal and public administration systems
and approaches each country uses at the
regional and local levels.
• Share strategies employed by
American and Afghan professionals to
counter corruption and bureaucratic
entanglements in the legal and public
administration systems.
• Establish structured interaction
among American and Afghan
participants designed to develop
enduring professional ties.
Proposals should include a
comprehensive U.S.-based group
educational and internship program for
legal and public administrative
professionals. One grant will be
awarded for this project for a period of
two to three years.
Competitive proposals will
demonstrate experience and contacts
with relevant legal and public
administration professionals,
organizations, and educational institutes
to program the U.S. components of this
program. If a subcontractor is proposed
for the internship placement, its
experience and relevance with public
administration needs to be explained.
Competitive proposals should also
demonstrate an understanding of the
structure of the Afghan government,
civil service, and legal systems.
Each U.S.-based component will
begin with a group orientation
(preferably in Washington, DC) with
workshops, lectures, and site visits to
introduce participants to the basics of
the legal system and public
administration in the United States.
This should be followed by hands-on
internship components at appropriate
host U.S. work sites to see these
practices at work. Internships should be
developed for small groups consisting of
not more than three persons. A final debriefing session in Washington, DC, for
each group should also be included in
the proposal.
Audience: Participants should be
professionals, who currently hold
positions within administrative or legal
bodies, and have at least five years of
active experience in the field. Note:
Afghan groups should be arranged
according to the professional level in
which they work, and by their language
ability. Proposals should demonstrate
an ability to implement programs based
in the provincial and local levels.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Possible audiences for recruitment
should include provincial and district
(state, local) public administration
officials, district attorney staff, legal aid
professionals, case workers, and judges
where possible.
Afghanistan Recruitment and Selection
Recruitment and selection for this
program in Afghanistan is to be closely
coordinated with the Public Affairs
Section of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.
Proposals can include information on a
proposed in-country partner
organization that would recruit program
participants, and include a proposed
plan and budget for this recruitment and
selection. However, applicants may
ultimately be asked to work with an
alternate organization recommended by
the Public Affairs Section of the U.S.
Embassy in Kabul to recruit program
participants. In either case, final
selections (including possible
interviews of program finalists) should
be done in conjunction with the Public
Affairs Section. All participants must be
approved by ECA and the Public Affairs
Section in Kabul.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,200,000 (pending availability of
funds).
Approximate Number of Awards:
One.
Approximate Average Award:
$1,200,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 1,
2010 (pending availability of funds).
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
September 1, 2013.
Additional Information: At this time,
support for this program is being
provided from special one-time FY
2009/FY 2010 supplemental funds that
have been appropriated to the
Department. In the event that additional
funds become available in fiscal years
2011 and 2012, and pending successful
implementation of the FY 2010 funded
program, ECA reserves the right to
renew this grant for two additional
fiscal years before openly competing it
again.
18007
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making one award for
approximately $1,200,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: Applicants
may only submit one proposal under
this competition. If more than one
proposal is received from the same
applicant, all submissions will be
declared technically ineligible and will
receive no further consideration in the
review process. Please note: Applicant
organizations are defined by their legal
name, and EIN number as stated on
their completed SF–424 form and
additional supporting documentation
outlined in the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.1 Contact Information To Request
an Application Package: Please contact
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
18008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/
PE/C, SA–5, Third Floor, U.S.
Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–0504, (202) 632–
6067, BeemerBT@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C/EUR–SCA–10–52 located at the top of
this announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Brent Beemer and refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number
ECA/PE/C/EUR–SCA–10–52 located at
the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation
package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA Federal
assistance awards must include in their
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving awards
(either a grant or cooperative agreement)
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ‘‘imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor’s
compliance with’’ 22 CFR part 62.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any
organization receiving an award under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing
the J visa program status. Therefore,
proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, recordkeeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/
D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0582.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted in
the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
recipient organization will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, demonstrating
concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater
participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and
explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts
between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18009
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
IV.3e.2a. Travel. International and
domestic airfare; airline baggage and
seat fees; visas; transit costs; ground
transportation costs. Please note that all
air travel must be in compliance with
the Fly America Act. There is no charge
for J–1 visas for participants in Bureau
sponsored programs.
IV.3e.2b. Per Diem. For U.S.-based
programming, organizations should use
the published Federal per diem rates for
individual U.S. cities. Domestic per
diem rates may be accessed at: https://
www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?contentType=
GSA_BASIC&contentId=17943. ECA
requests applicants to budget realistic
costs that reflect the local economy and
do not exceed Federal per diem rates.
Foreign per diem rates can be accessed
at: https://aoprals.state.gov/content.asp?
content_id=184&menu_id=78.
IV.3e.2c. Interpreters. As stated
previously, ECA anticipates that most
participants coming to the U.S. on this
program will not have command of
English. ECA is requiring that eventual
award recipients ask ECA to assign State
Department interpreters for this project.
One interpreter is typically needed for
every four participants who require
interpretation. When an applicant
proposes to use State Department
interpreters, the following expenses
should be included in the budget:
Published Federal per diem rates (both
‘‘lodging’’ and ‘‘M&IE’’) and ‘‘homeprogram-home’’ transportation in the
amount of $400 per interpreter. Salary
expenses for State Department
interpreters will be covered by the
Bureau and should not be part of an
applicant’s proposed budget. Bureau
funds cannot support interpreters who
accompany delegations from their home
country or travel internationally.
IV.3e.2d. Book and Cultural
Allowances. Foreign participants are
entitled to a one-time cultural allowance
of $150 per person, plus a book
allowance of $50. Interpreters should be
reimbursed up to $150 for expenses
when they escort participants to cultural
events. U.S. program staff, trainers or
participants are not eligible to receive
these benefits.
IV.3e.2e. Consultants. Consultants
may be used to provide specialized
expertise or to make presentations.
Honoraria rates should not exceed $250
per day. Organizations are encouraged
to cost-share rates that would exceed
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
18010
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
that figure. Subcontracting organizations
may also be employed, in which case
the written agreement between the
prospective grantee and sub-grantee
should be included in the proposal.
Such sub-grants should detail the
division of responsibilities and
proposed costs, and subcontracts should
be itemized in the budget.
IV.3e.2f. Room rental. The rental of
meeting space should not exceed $250
per day. Any rates that exceed this
amount should be cost shared.
IV.3e.2g. Materials. Proposals may
contain costs to purchase, develop and
translate materials for participants.
Costs for high quality translation of
materials should be anticipated and
included in the budget. Grantee
organizations should expect to submit a
copy of all program materials to ECA,
and ECA support should be
acknowledged on all materials
developed with its funding.
IV.3e.2h. Equipment. Applicants may
propose to use grant funds to purchase
equipment, such as computers and
printers; these costs should be justified
in the budget narrative. Costs for
furniture are not allowed.
IV.3e.2i. Working meal. Normally, no
more than one working meal may be
provided during the program. Per capita
costs may not exceed $15–$25 for lunch
and $20–$35 for dinner, excluding room
rental. The number of invited guests
may not exceed participants by more
than a factor of two-to-one. When
setting up a budget, interpreters should
be considered ‘‘participants.’’
IV.3e.2j. Return travel allowance. A
return travel allowance of $70 for each
foreign participant may be included in
the budget. This allowance would cover
incidental expenses incurred during
international travel.
IV.3e.2k. Health Insurance. Foreign
participants will be covered during their
participation in the program by the
ECA-sponsored Accident and Sickness
Program for Exchanges (ASPE), for
which the grantee must enroll them.
Details of that policy can be provided by
the contact officers identified in this
solicitation. The premium is paid by
ECA and should not be included in the
grant proposal budget. However,
applicants are permitted to include
costs for travel insurance for U.S.
participants in the budget.
IV.3e.2l. Wire transfer fees. When
necessary, applicants may include costs
to transfer funds to partner
organizations overseas. Grantees are
urged to research applicable taxes that
may be imposed on these transfers by
host governments.
IV.3e.2m. In-Country Travel Costs for
Visa Processing Purposes. Given the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:22 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements associated with obtaining
J–1 visas for ECA-supported
participants, applicants should include
costs for any travel associated with visa
interviews or DS–2019 pick-up.
IV.3e.2n. Administrative Costs. Costs
necessary for the effective
administration of the program may
include salaries for grantee organization
employees, benefits, and other direct
and indirect costs per detailed
instructions in the Application Package.
While there is no rigid ratio of
administrative to program costs,
proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested ECA grant funds will be more
competitive under the cost effectiveness
and cost sharing criterion, per item V.1
below. Proposals should show strong
administrative cost sharing
contributions from the applicant, the incountry partner and other sources.
Please also include in the administrative
portion of your budget plans to travel to
Washington, DC, to meet with your
program officer within the first 45 days
after the grant has been awarded. Please
refer to the Solicitation Package for
complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: May 21,
2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/EUR–
SCA–10–52.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 10 copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/PE/C/EUR–SCA–10–52,
Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
CD–ROM. As appropriate, the Bureau
will provide these files electronically to
Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S.
embassy(ies) for its (their) review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility
for applicant timeliness of submission or data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes for proposals submitted
via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support;
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726;
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time; E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants
submitting proposals via the Grants.gov
Web portal to ensure that proposals
have been received by Grants.gov in
their entirety, and ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting
from transmission or conversion
processes.
Optional—IV.3f.3. You may also state
here any limitations on the number of
applications that an applicant may
submit and make it clear whether the
limitation is on the submitting
organization, individual program
director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance award
grants resides with the Bureau’s Grants
Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and
flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will
meet the program’s objectives and plan.
3. Institutional Capacity and Record:
Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and
appropriate to achieve the program or
project’s goals. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of
successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
Bureau awards (grants or cooperative
agreements) as determined by Bureau
Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
4. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18011
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project:
Special Provision for Performance in
a Designated Combat Area (Currently
Iraq and Afghanistan).
All Recipient personnel deploying to
areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense
(currently Iraq and Afghanistan), under
assistance awards over $100,000 or
performance over 14 days must register
in the Department of Defense
maintained Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker
(SPOT) system. Recipients of federal
assistance awards shall register in SPOT
before deployment, or if already in the
designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the
assistance award, and maintain current
data in SPOT. Information on how to
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
18012
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Notices
register in SPOT will be available from
your Grants Officer or Grants Officer
Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the
federal assistance awards process.
Recipients of federal assistance awards
are advised that adherence to this policy
and procedure will be a requirement of
all final federal assistance awards issued
by ECA.
Recipient performance may require
the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such
private security contractors (PSCs) are
required, grantees are required to ensure
they adhere to Chief of Mission (COM)
policies and procedures regarding the
operation, oversight, and accountability
of PSCs.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one electronic copy of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3)) above for
Program Monitoring and Evaluation
information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data
Requirements: Award recipients will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the agreement or who
benefit from the award funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Brent Beemer,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C,
Third Floor SA–5, Third Floor, U.S.
Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20522–0504.
Brent Beemer: 202–632–6067,
BeemerBT@state.gov. All
correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
EUR–SCA–10–52.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 2, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–7979 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA 2010–0005–N–8]
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking
approval of the following information
collection activities. Before submitting
these information collection
requirements for clearance by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), FRA
is soliciting public comment on specific
aspects of the activities identified
below.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than June 7, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on any or all of the following proposed
activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert
Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 17,
Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Kimberly
Toone, Office of Information
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC
20590. Commenters requesting FRA to
acknowledge receipt of their respective
comments must include a self-addressed
stamped postcard stating, ‘‘Comments
on OMB control number 2130–New.’’
Alternatively, comments may be
transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493–
6216 or (202) 493–6497, or via e-mail to
Mr. Brogan at Robert.Brogan@dot.gov, or
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18005-18012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7979]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6950]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: The U.S./Afghanistan Professional Partnership Program
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-52.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 21, 2010.
Executive Summary: In his December 1, 2009, speech in West Point,
New York, President Obama said that a new
[[Page 18006]]
diplomatic initiative in Afghanistan would be part of the U.S. strategy
to bring peace and stability in the Afghanistan/Pakistan region. As
part of this initiative, ECA is seeking proposals for a new program,
called ``The U.S./Afghanistan Professional Partnership Program.'' This
program will bring young professionals from the two countries together
to develop cross cultural relationships and develop professional skills
that will positively impact people's lives and will result in stronger
ties between the two nations.
Pending availability of funds, the Bureau expects to award one
grant for approximately $1,200,000. The project is focused on
professionals working in the judicial system and public administration
and will be designed to demonstrate best practices, offer professional
development opportunities, and support internships at U.S-based
workplaces for Afghan professionals. The program will involve
provincial and district (state, local) public administration officials,
district attorney offices, legal aid offices, case workers, and judges
where possible.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' Funding for this competition is
provided through special FY 2009/FY 2010 supplemental funds that have
been appropriated to the Department of State.
General Program Outlines
Language: This program is for English and non-English speaking
Afghan participants. English language ability will not be a requirement
to participate. Groups of Afghan professionals should be arranged
according to language ability/preference (English and Dari). For the
Dari-speaking participants, State Department Language Services
interpreters will be assigned through the Office of Citizen Exchanges.
There will be approximately three interpreters assigned for the group
orientation portion of the program and about one interpreter to three
Afghan participants for the internship portion of the program.
Proposals should budget for the appropriate amount of interpreters. See
IV.3e.2c. for specifics on budgeting for interpreters.
Visas: Applicants must demonstrate that they can work with ECA and
the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul for the U.S.
visas and directly with the Afghan Embassy for its visas (if
necessary). ECA will issue the DS-2019 forms required for J visas; see
Section IV.3d.1 for additional information related to the
administration of J visa programs.
Travel: The grantee will arrange all round-trip international
travel, complying with the Fly America Act, and domestic travel
arrangements for the participants. All Afghan and American participants
must depart and arrive in Afghanistan through Kabul. Proposals should
include plans to house the Afghan participants in Kabul for at least
one day to coordinate pre-departure and post program briefings with the
Public Affairs Staff of the U.S. Embassy.
U.S. Based Programs: The recipients of grant awards will be
responsible for implementing programs from four to six weeks in the
United States for the Afghan participants. It is envisioned that the
Afghan participants will be grouped in delegations of ten who will
travel together to the United States. Each delegation of ten Afghan
participants will travel at different times throughout the grant
period. The Afghan participants will be placed within relevant,
reputable, legally-recognized U.S. organizations where they will gain
hands-on experience with legal and public administration professions in
the United States, and will have the opportunity to establish
relationships with U.S. professional counterparts for on-going
collaboration. The grantee may want to engage with a partner or sub-
grantee to arrange for the internship placement. The grantee should
also include cultural enrichment activities as an integral part of the
experience. Such activities could include outings to museums, historic
sites, sporting events, cultural exhibits, local schools or community
events, volunteering and other opportunities to experience American
culture and diversity. Short-term homestays to give participants a
personal experience of how typical Americans live are highly desirable.
Afghanistan-Based Programs: Proposals should also describe a
selection process and logistics for a one to two-week Afghanistan-based
program for a smaller number of U.S. participants. The U.S.
participants will be selected from among the internship host
organizations for the Afghan participants and will travel several
months after the Afghans return home. The Afghanistan-based program may
include public presentations, joint skills development programs, and
media interviews, if possible. All details and specifics on
Afghanistan-based programs will be arranged in close coordination with
the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.
Note: Because of the changing nature of the security situation,
U.S. participants may not be able to travel to Afghanistan.
Therefore, proposals should include a contingency plan to bring U.S.
and Afghan participants together in a third country (preferably
within the South and Central Asia region) for this program
component. See VI.1b for additional information on Assistance Awards
in Afghanistan.
Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting: The Bureau places high
importance on monitoring and evaluation as a means of ensuring and
measuring a project's success. Proposals must include a detailed
monitoring and evaluation plan that assesses the impact of the project.
Please refer to section IV.3d.3. Project Monitoring and Evaluation
below.
Follow-up Activities: The grant recipients will develop enhancement
activities that reinforce program goals after the participants' return
to Afghanistan. This includes informing participants of the Bureau's
Alumni program, facilitating their enrollment, and encouraging their
on-going participation. Please refer to the PSI for additional
information on Alumni, Outreach, and Engagement.
Fiscal Management: Applicants must demonstrate competency to manage
all financial aspects of the project, including participant costs and
transparent arrangements of sub-grant relationships with partner
organizations, if applicable.
Contact ECA: All interested organizations should contact ECA
Program Officer Brent Beemer before the submission of proposals. ECA
will also put the organizations in contact with appropriate colleagues
at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. Brent Beemer: 202-632-6067,
BeemerBT@state.gov.
Specific Program Details
Professional Partnerships: The Judicial System and Public
Administration.
This program will provide approximately 100 participants from
Afghanistan and the United States the
[[Page 18007]]
opportunity to study the legal systems and public administration
techniques and processes in both countries and for Afghan professionals
to take part in internships with legal and public administration
professionals in the U.S. Successful programs will achieve the
following:
Demonstrate Afghan and American legal and public
administration systems and approaches each country uses at the regional
and local levels.
Share strategies employed by American and Afghan
professionals to counter corruption and bureaucratic entanglements in
the legal and public administration systems.
Establish structured interaction among American and Afghan
participants designed to develop enduring professional ties.
Proposals should include a comprehensive U.S.-based group
educational and internship program for legal and public administrative
professionals. One grant will be awarded for this project for a period
of two to three years.
Competitive proposals will demonstrate experience and contacts with
relevant legal and public administration professionals, organizations,
and educational institutes to program the U.S. components of this
program. If a subcontractor is proposed for the internship placement,
its experience and relevance with public administration needs to be
explained. Competitive proposals should also demonstrate an
understanding of the structure of the Afghan government, civil service,
and legal systems.
Each U.S.-based component will begin with a group orientation
(preferably in Washington, DC) with workshops, lectures, and site
visits to introduce participants to the basics of the legal system and
public administration in the United States. This should be followed by
hands-on internship components at appropriate host U.S. work sites to
see these practices at work. Internships should be developed for small
groups consisting of not more than three persons. A final de-briefing
session in Washington, DC, for each group should also be included in
the proposal.
Audience: Participants should be professionals, who currently hold
positions within administrative or legal bodies, and have at least five
years of active experience in the field. Note: Afghan groups should be
arranged according to the professional level in which they work, and by
their language ability. Proposals should demonstrate an ability to
implement programs based in the provincial and local levels. Possible
audiences for recruitment should include provincial and district
(state, local) public administration officials, district attorney
staff, legal aid professionals, case workers, and judges where
possible.
Afghanistan Recruitment and Selection
Recruitment and selection for this program in Afghanistan is to be
closely coordinated with the Public Affairs Section of the U.S. Embassy
in Kabul. Proposals can include information on a proposed in-country
partner organization that would recruit program participants, and
include a proposed plan and budget for this recruitment and selection.
However, applicants may ultimately be asked to work with an alternate
organization recommended by the Public Affairs Section of the U.S.
Embassy in Kabul to recruit program participants. In either case, final
selections (including possible interviews of program finalists) should
be done in conjunction with the Public Affairs Section. All
participants must be approved by ECA and the Public Affairs Section in
Kabul.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,200,000 (pending availability of
funds).
Approximate Number of Awards: One.
Approximate Average Award: $1,200,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 1, 2010 (pending availability of
funds).
Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 1, 2013.
Additional Information: At this time, support for this program is
being provided from special one-time FY 2009/FY 2010 supplemental funds
that have been appropriated to the Department. In the event that
additional funds become available in fiscal years 2011 and 2012, and
pending successful implementation of the FY 2010 funded program, ECA
reserves the right to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award
for approximately $1,200,000 to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: Applicants may only submit one proposal
under this competition. If more than one proposal is received from the
same applicant, all submissions will be declared technically ineligible
and will receive no further consideration in the review process. Please
note: Applicant organizations are defined by their legal name, and EIN
number as stated on their completed SF-424 form and additional
supporting documentation outlined in the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package: Please
contact
[[Page 18008]]
the Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C, SA-5, Third Floor, U.S.
Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-0504,
(202) 632-6067, BeemerBT@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package.
Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-52
located at the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Brent Beemer and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-52 located at the top of this announcement
on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA Federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J
visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations
receiving awards (either a grant or cooperative agreement) under this
RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor
in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The actions of recipient
organizations shall be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the
sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau
expects that any organization receiving an award under this competition
will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully
comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.,
including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA-5,
Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully
[[Page 18009]]
enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take appropriate
steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to
human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.'' Public Law 106-
113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do
not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals
should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, demonstrating concrete actions to apply
knowledge in work or community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation
of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between
participants, community members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
IV.3e.2a. Travel. International and domestic airfare; airline
baggage and seat fees; visas; transit costs; ground transportation
costs. Please note that all air travel must be in compliance with the
Fly America Act. There is no charge for J-1 visas for participants in
Bureau sponsored programs.
IV.3e.2b. Per Diem. For U.S.-based programming, organizations
should use the published Federal per diem rates for individual U.S.
cities. Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentType=GSA_BASIC&contentId=17943.
ECA requests applicants to budget realistic costs that reflect the
local economy and do not exceed Federal per diem rates. Foreign per
diem rates can be accessed at: https://aoprals.state.gov/content.asp?content_id=184&menu_id=78.
IV.3e.2c. Interpreters. As stated previously, ECA anticipates that
most participants coming to the U.S. on this program will not have
command of English. ECA is requiring that eventual award recipients ask
ECA to assign State Department interpreters for this project. One
interpreter is typically needed for every four participants who require
interpretation. When an applicant proposes to use State Department
interpreters, the following expenses should be included in the budget:
Published Federal per diem rates (both ``lodging'' and ``M&IE'') and
``home-program-home'' transportation in the amount of $400 per
interpreter. Salary expenses for State Department interpreters will be
covered by the Bureau and should not be part of an applicant's proposed
budget. Bureau funds cannot support interpreters who accompany
delegations from their home country or travel internationally.
IV.3e.2d. Book and Cultural Allowances. Foreign participants are
entitled to a one-time cultural allowance of $150 per person, plus a
book allowance of $50. Interpreters should be reimbursed up to $150 for
expenses when they escort participants to cultural events. U.S. program
staff, trainers or participants are not eligible to receive these
benefits.
IV.3e.2e. Consultants. Consultants may be used to provide
specialized expertise or to make presentations. Honoraria rates should
not exceed $250 per day. Organizations are encouraged to cost-share
rates that would exceed
[[Page 18010]]
that figure. Subcontracting organizations may also be employed, in
which case the written agreement between the prospective grantee and
sub-grantee should be included in the proposal. Such sub-grants should
detail the division of responsibilities and proposed costs, and
subcontracts should be itemized in the budget.
IV.3e.2f. Room rental. The rental of meeting space should not
exceed $250 per day. Any rates that exceed this amount should be cost
shared.
IV.3e.2g. Materials. Proposals may contain costs to purchase,
develop and translate materials for participants. Costs for high
quality translation of materials should be anticipated and included in
the budget. Grantee organizations should expect to submit a copy of all
program materials to ECA, and ECA support should be acknowledged on all
materials developed with its funding.
IV.3e.2h. Equipment. Applicants may propose to use grant funds to
purchase equipment, such as computers and printers; these costs should
be justified in the budget narrative. Costs for furniture are not
allowed.
IV.3e.2i. Working meal. Normally, no more than one working meal may
be provided during the program. Per capita costs may not exceed $15-$25
for lunch and $20-$35 for dinner, excluding room rental. The number of
invited guests may not exceed participants by more than a factor of
two-to-one. When setting up a budget, interpreters should be considered
``participants.''
IV.3e.2j. Return travel allowance. A return travel allowance of $70
for each foreign participant may be included in the budget. This
allowance would cover incidental expenses incurred during international
travel.
IV.3e.2k. Health Insurance. Foreign participants will be covered
during their participation in the program by the ECA-sponsored Accident
and Sickness Program for Exchanges (ASPE), for which the grantee must
enroll them. Details of that policy can be provided by the contact
officers identified in this solicitation. The premium is paid by ECA
and should not be included in the grant proposal budget. However,
applicants are permitted to include costs for travel insurance for U.S.
participants in the budget.
IV.3e.2l. Wire transfer fees. When necessary, applicants may
include costs to transfer funds to partner organizations overseas.
Grantees are urged to research applicable taxes that may be imposed on
these transfers by host governments.
IV.3e.2m. In-Country Travel Costs for Visa Processing Purposes.
Given the requirements associated with obtaining J-1 visas for ECA-
supported participants, applicants should include costs for any travel
associated with visa interviews or DS-2019 pick-up.
IV.3e.2n. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective
administration of the program may include salaries for grantee
organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs
per detailed instructions in the Application Package. While there is no
rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which the
administrative costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested ECA grant
funds will be more competitive under the cost effectiveness and cost
sharing criterion, per item V.1 below. Proposals should show strong
administrative cost sharing contributions from the applicant, the in-
country partner and other sources. Please also include in the
administrative portion of your budget plans to travel to Washington,
DC, to meet with your program officer within the first 45 days after
the grant has been awarded. Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: May 21, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-52.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-
52, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-0504.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on CD-ROM. As
appropriate, the Bureau will provide these files electronically to
Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its (their)
review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant
timeliness of submission or data errors resulting from transmission
or conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application
[[Page 18011]]
deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support; Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726; Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time; E-
mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Optional--IV.3f.3. You may also state here any limitations on the
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual
program director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance award grants resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the Program Idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Program Planning and Ability to Achieve Objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to
the program overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should
be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Institutional Capacity and Record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve
the program or project's goals. Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau awards (grants or cooperative agreements)
as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
4. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
Special Provision for Performance in a Designated Combat Area
(Currently Iraq and Afghanistan).
All Recipient personnel deploying to areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense (currently Iraq and
Afghanistan), under assistance awards over $100,000 or performance over
14 days must register in the Department of Defense maintained
Synchronized Pre-deployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) system.
Recipients of federal assistance awards shall register in SPOT before
deployment, or if already in the designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the assistance award, and maintain
current data in SPOT. Information on how to
[[Page 18012]]
register in SPOT will be available from your Grants Officer or Grants
Officer Representative during the final negotiation and approval stages
in the federal assistance awards process. Recipients of federal
assistance awards are advised that adherence to this policy and
procedure will be a requirement of all final federal assistance awards
issued by ECA.
Recipient performance may require the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such private security contractors (PSCs)
are required, grantees are required to ensure they adhere to Chief of
Mission (COM) policies and procedures regarding the operation,
oversight, and accountability of PSCs.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one electronic copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3)) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Optional Program Data Requirements: Award recipients will be
required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the agreement
or who benefit from the award funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Brent Beemer,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C, Third Floor SA-5, Third Floor,
U.S. Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20522-
0504.
Brent Beemer: 202-632-6067, BeemerBT@state.gov. All correspondence
with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above title
and number ECA/PE/C/EUR-SCA-10-52.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 2, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-7979 Filed 4-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P