Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Particulate Matter Standards, 17865-17868 [2010-7968]
Download as PDF
17865
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.420
*
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
Name of non-regulatory SIP
revision
State submittal
date
Applicable geographic area
*
*
*
Reasonable Further Progress
Delaware portion of the PhilaPlan (RFP), Reasonably
delphia 1997 8-hour ozone
Available Control Measures,
moderate nonattainment
and Contingency Measures.
area.
Delaware portion of the Phila2002 Base Year Inventory for
delphia 1997 8-hour ozone
VOC, NOX, and CO.
moderate nonattainment
area.
2008 RFP Transportation
Delaware portion of the PhilaConformity Budgets.
delphia 1997 8-hour ozone
moderate nonattainment
area.
3. Section 52.423 is amended by
revising the section heading and by
adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.423
Base Year Emissions Inventory.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) EPA approves as a revision to the
Delaware State Implementation Plan the
2002 base year emissions inventories for
the Delaware portion of the
Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone
moderate nonattainment area submitted
by the Secretary of the Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental
Control on June 13, 2007. This submittal
consists of the 2002 base year point,
EPA approval date
*
6/13/07
*
4/8/10 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
6/13/07
4/8/10 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
6/13/07
Additional explanation
4/8/10 [Insert page number
where the document begins].
area, non-road mobile, and on-road
mobile source inventories in area for the
following pollutants: Volatile organic
compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide
(CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
4. Section 52.426 is amended by
adding paragraphs (g) and (h) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.426 Control strategy plans for
attainment and rate-of-progress: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) EPA approves revisions to the
Delaware State Implementation Plan
consisting of the 2008 reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, reasonably
*
*
available control measures, and
contingency measures for the Delaware
portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour
ozone moderate nonattainment area
submitted by the Secretary of the
Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control on June 13,
2007.
(h) EPA approves the following 2008
RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) for the Delaware portion of the
Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone
moderate nonattainment area submitted
by the Secretary of the Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental
Control on June 13, 2007:
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EMISSIONS BUDGETS FOR THE DELAWARE PORTION OF THE PHILADELPHIA AREA FOR THE
2008 RATE OF PROGRESS PLAN
2008 Emissions
(tons per day)
County
VOC
Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP
approval
NOX
Kent ..........................................................................
4.14
9.68
New Castle ...............................................................
Sussex ......................................................................
10.61
7.09
21.35
12.86
State Total .........................................................
21.84
43.89
[FR Doc. 2010–7878 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0731; FRL–9129–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Particulate Matter
Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:46 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Direct final rule.
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
January 5, 2009, (73 FR 77682), published December 19, 2008.
SUMMARY: Wisconsin updated its state
ambient air quality standards rules to
match the current Federal standards.
The updates were made to the
particulate matter standards by adding
fine particulate standards and revoking
the state’s course particulate standards.
EPA revised its particulate matter
standards in October 2006 by
strengthening the 24-hour fine
particulate standard and revoking the
annual standard for course particulate.
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Wisconsin State Implementation Plan
(SIP) as requested by the state on
September 11, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
17866
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective June 7, 2010, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 10,
2010. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2009–0731, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: compher.michael@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2511.
4. Mail: Michael Compher, Acting
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Michael Compher,
Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2009–
0731. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:46 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Matt
Rau, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
886–6524 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 886–6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA’s analysis of the revision?
III. What are the environmental effects of this
action?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this
action?
Wisconsin requested a revision to its
SIP on September 11, 2009. The request
is to update the particulate matter
ambient air quality standards. The
particulate matter standards were
revised to match the 2006 Federal
standards. On October 17, 2006, EPA
revised its particulate matter ambient air
quality standards, strengthening the 24hour fine particulate (PM2.5) standard
and retaining the annual PM2.5 standard.
EPA also revoked the annual standard
for coarse particulate matter (PM10)
because available evidence did not
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
suggest a link between long term PM10
exposure and health problems. The 24hour PM10 standard remains in place.
II. What is EPA’s analysis of the
revision?
Wisconsin revised chapters NR 404
and 484 of the Wisconsin
Administration Code. Wisconsin added
the definition of PM2.5 and the PM2.5
ambient air quality standards to its rules
to be consistent with current Federal
standards. Wisconsin also removed the
annual PM10 standard.
The revisions made by Wisconsin are
in accordance with the current Federal
PM2.5 and PM10 standards. EPA
strengthened the particulate matter
ambient air quality standards in 2006 to
reflect the latest scientific data for
protecting human health, and
Wisconsin has adopted the same
standards to keep its ambient air quality
standards current with the Federal
standards.
III. What are the environmental effects
of this action?
This action incorporates the Federal
PM2.5 and PM10 ambient air quality
standards into the Wisconsin SIP,
including the more stringent standard
for 24-hour PM2.5 standard. The current
Federal standards are effective and
enforceable nationwide. The revisions
add clarity for Wisconsin sources and
stakeholders, as it updates the PM10
standards and adds the PM2.5 standards
to the state rules.
Particulate matter interferes with lung
function when inhaled. Exposure to
particulates can cause heart and lung
disease. Particulate matter also
aggravates asthma. Airborne particulate
is the main source of haze that causes
a reduction in visibility. Particulate
matter is also deposited on the ground
and in the water, changing nutrient and
chemical balances.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to the
Wisconsin SIP. Wisconsin revised
chapters NR 404 and 484 of the
Wisconsin Administration Code. In
chapter NR 404, the state removed the
annual PM10 standard, added the
definition of PM2.5, and added the 2006
PM2.5 standards. Wisconsin
incorporated by reference the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) monitoring
requirements into chapter NR 484 that
correspond to the chapter NR 404
revisions. Specifically, Wisconsin
incorporated 40 CFR part 50 appendices
K, L, and M and 40 CFR part 53 by
reference into chapter NR 484.
We are publishing this action without
prior proposal because we view this as
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
state plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective June 7, 2010 without further
notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by May 10,
2010. If we receive such comments, we
will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
If we do not receive any comments, this
action will be effective June 7, 2010.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:46 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 7, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17867
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter.
Dated: March 11, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YY—Wisconsin
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(121) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2570
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(121) On September 11, 2009, the
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a State
Implementation Plan revision request.
The state’s ambient air quality standards
were revised to match the 2006 Federal
ambient air quality standards for
particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).
(i) Incorporation by reference. The
following sections of the Wisconsin
Administrative Code are incorporated
by reference:
(A) NR 404.02 Definitions. NR
404.02(4e) ‘‘PM2.5’’ as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register, on
September 30, 2009, No. 645, effective
October 1, 2009.
(B) NR 404.04 Ambient Air Quality
Standards. NR 404.04(8) ‘‘PM10:
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
STANDARDS.’’ and NR 404.04(9)
‘‘PM2.5:
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
STANDARDS’’ as published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register, on
September 30, 2009, No. 645, effective
October 1, 2009.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) NR 484.03 Code of federal
regulations. NR 484.03(5) in Table 1 as
published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register, on September
30, 2009, No. 645, effective October 1,
2009.
(B) NR 484.04 Code of federal
regulations appendices. NR 484.04(6),
(6g), and (6r) in Table 2, as published in
the Wisconsin Administrative Register,
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
17868
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 67 / Thursday, April 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
on September 30, 2009, No. 645,
effective October 1, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–7968 Filed 4–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2007–0993; FRL–9134–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Interstate Transport of Pollution
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of New Mexico
for the purpose of addressing the ‘‘good
neighbor’’ provisions of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the
1997 ozone standards and the 1997
PM2.5 standards. This SIP revision
satisfies a portion of the State of New
Mexico’s obligation to submit a SIP
revision that demonstrates that adequate
provisions are in place to prohibit air
emissions from adversely affecting
another state’s air quality through
interstate transport. This rulemaking
action is being taken under section 110
of the CAA and addresses one element
of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), which
pertains to prohibiting air pollutant
emissions from within New Mexico
from significantly contributing to
nonattainment of the ozone and PM2.5
NAAQS in any state.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective June 7, 2010 without further
notice unless EPA receives relevant
adverse comments by May 10, 2010. If
adverse comments are received, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2007–0993, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
• EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web
site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD
(Multimedia)’’ and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at
donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please also
send a copy by e-mail to the person
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:46 Apr 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
section below.
• Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–7263.
• Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief,
Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such
deliveries are accepted only between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays,
and not on legal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2007–0993.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
CONTACT
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. The file will
be made available by appointment for
public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA
Review Room between the hours of 8:30
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for
legal holidays. Contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill
Deese at 214–665–7253 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
The state submittal is also available
for public inspection during official
business hours, by appointment, at the
New Mexico Environment Department,
Air Quality Bureau, 1190 St. Francis
Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emad Shahin, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–6717; fax number
(214) 665–7263; e-mail address
shahin.emad@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the
EPA.
Outline
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is a SIP?
III. What Is the Background for This Action?
IV. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s
Submission?
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
We are approving a submission from
the State of New Mexico demonstrating
that New Mexico has adequately
addressed one of the required elements
of the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), the
element that prohibits air pollutant
emissions from sources within a state
from significantly contributing to
nonattainment of the relevant NAAQS
in any other state. We have determined
that emissions from sources in New
Mexico do not significantly contribute
to nonattainment of the 1997 ozone
standards or of the 1997 PM2.5 standards
in any other state. The remaining three
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17865-17868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0731; FRL-9129-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Particulate Matter Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Wisconsin updated its state ambient air quality standards
rules to match the current Federal standards. The updates were made to
the particulate matter standards by adding fine particulate standards
and revoking the state's course particulate standards. EPA revised its
particulate matter standards in October 2006 by strengthening the 24-
hour fine particulate standard and revoking the annual standard for
course particulate. EPA is approving the revisions to the Wisconsin
State Implementation Plan (SIP) as requested by the state on September
11, 2009.
[[Page 17866]]
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 7, 2010, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by May 10, 2010. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2009-0731, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: compher.michael@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2511.
4. Mail: Michael Compher, Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Michael Compher, Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2009-0731. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886-6524 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
Wisconsin requested a revision to its SIP on September 11, 2009.
The request is to update the particulate matter ambient air quality
standards. The particulate matter standards were revised to match the
2006 Federal standards. On October 17, 2006, EPA revised its
particulate matter ambient air quality standards, strengthening the 24-
hour fine particulate (PM2.5) standard and retaining the
annual PM2.5 standard. EPA also revoked the annual standard
for coarse particulate matter (PM10) because available
evidence did not suggest a link between long term PM10
exposure and health problems. The 24-hour PM10 standard
remains in place.
II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?
Wisconsin revised chapters NR 404 and 484 of the Wisconsin
Administration Code. Wisconsin added the definition of PM2.5
and the PM2.5 ambient air quality standards to its rules to
be consistent with current Federal standards. Wisconsin also removed
the annual PM10 standard.
The revisions made by Wisconsin are in accordance with the current
Federal PM2.5 and PM10 standards. EPA
strengthened the particulate matter ambient air quality standards in
2006 to reflect the latest scientific data for protecting human health,
and Wisconsin has adopted the same standards to keep its ambient air
quality standards current with the Federal standards.
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
This action incorporates the Federal PM2.5 and
PM10 ambient air quality standards into the Wisconsin SIP,
including the more stringent standard for 24-hour PM2.5
standard. The current Federal standards are effective and enforceable
nationwide. The revisions add clarity for Wisconsin sources and
stakeholders, as it updates the PM10 standards and adds the
PM2.5 standards to the state rules.
Particulate matter interferes with lung function when inhaled.
Exposure to particulates can cause heart and lung disease. Particulate
matter also aggravates asthma. Airborne particulate is the main source
of haze that causes a reduction in visibility. Particulate matter is
also deposited on the ground and in the water, changing nutrient and
chemical balances.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to the Wisconsin SIP. Wisconsin revised
chapters NR 404 and 484 of the Wisconsin Administration Code. In
chapter NR 404, the state removed the annual PM10 standard,
added the definition of PM2.5, and added the 2006
PM2.5 standards. Wisconsin incorporated by reference the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) monitoring requirements into chapter
NR 484 that correspond to the chapter NR 404 revisions. Specifically,
Wisconsin incorporated 40 CFR part 50 appendices K, L, and M and 40 CFR
part 53 by reference into chapter NR 484.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as
[[Page 17867]]
a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register
publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as
the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be effective June 7, 2010 without
further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by
May 10, 2010. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. If we do not
receive any comments, this action will be effective June 7, 2010.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 7, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.
Dated: March 11, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YY--Wisconsin
0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(121) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(121) On September 11, 2009, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a State Implementation Plan revision request. The
state's ambient air quality standards were revised to match the 2006
Federal ambient air quality standards for particulate matter
(PM10 and PM2.5).
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code are incorporated by reference:
(A) NR 404.02 Definitions. NR 404.02(4e) ``PM2.5'' as
published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register, on September 30,
2009, No. 645, effective October 1, 2009.
(B) NR 404.04 Ambient Air Quality Standards. NR 404.04(8)
``PM10: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STANDARDS.'' and NR 404.04(9)
``PM2.5:
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STANDARDS'' as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register, on September 30, 2009, No. 645, effective
October 1, 2009.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) NR 484.03 Code of federal regulations. NR 484.03(5) in Table 1
as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register, on September 30,
2009, No. 645, effective October 1, 2009.
(B) NR 484.04 Code of federal regulations appendices. NR 484.04(6),
(6g), and (6r) in Table 2, as published in the Wisconsin Administrative
Register,
[[Page 17868]]
on September 30, 2009, No. 645, effective October 1, 2009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-7968 Filed 4-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P