Approved Recovery Plan for the Scaleshell Mussel, 17758-17760 [2010-7849]
Download as PDF
17758
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
Number of annual
respondents
Activity
3-200-11 – Falconry ................................................................
3-200-12 – Raptor Propagation ...............................................
3-200-13 – Depredation ...........................................................
3-200-14 – Bald and Golden Eagle Exhibition ........................
3-200-15a – Eagle Parts for Native American Religious Purposes – Permit Application First Order and Tribal Enrollment Certification.
3-200-15b – Eagle Parts for Native American Religious Purposes – Reorder Request.
3-200-16 – Take of Depredating Eagles .................................
3-200-17 – Eagle Falconry ......................................................
3-200-18 – Take of Golden Eagle Nests ................................
3-200-67 – Special Canada Goose .........................................
3-200-68 – Renewal of a Permit .............................................
3-200-71 – Eagle Take ............................................................
3-200-72 – Eagle Nest Take ...................................................
3-200-71 and 72 – Permit Amendments .................................
3-200-71 and 72 – Programmatic Permit ................................
3-200-71 and 72 – Programmatic Permit Amendments .........
3-200-77 – Native American Eagle Take ................................
3-200-78 – Native American Eagle Aviary ..............................
3-200-79 – Special Purpose – Abatement Activities Using
Raptors*.
3-200-81—Special Purpose—Utility ........................................
3-200-82—Eagle Transport Into and Out of United States .....
3-202-1 – Scientific Collecting Annual Report ........................
3-202-2 – Waterfowl Sale and Disposal Annual Report .........
3-202-3 – Special Purpose Salvage Annual Report ...............
3-202-4 – Rehabilitation Annual Report ..................................
3-202-5 – Possession for Education Annual Report ...............
3-202-6 – Special Purpose Game Bird Annual Report ...........
3-202-7 – Special Purpose Miscellaneous Annual Report .....
3-202-8 – Raptor Propagation Annual Report ........................
3-202-9 – Depredation Annual Report ....................................
3-200-10 – Special State Canada Goose Annual Report .......
3-202-11 – Eagle Depredation Annual Report ........................
3-202-12 – Special Purpose Possession (Education) Annual
Report.
3-202-13 – Eagle Exhibition Annual Report ............................
3-202-14 – Native American Eagle Aviary Annual Report ......
3-202-15—Eagle Take Monitoring and Annual Report ...........
3-202-16—Eagle Nest Take Monitoring and Reporting ..........
3-202-17—Special Purpose-Utility Annual Report ..................
3-186 – Notice of Transfer or Sale of Migratory Waterfowl ....
3-186A – Migratory Bird Acquisition and Disposition Report ..
Totals ................................................................................
* Rounded
** Completion time varies from 1.5
hours for individuals to 3 hours for
businesses. Average completion time is
2.9 hours.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
III. Request for Comments
We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Number of annual
responses
Annual burden
hours*
700
50
2,720
135
1,830
700
50
2,720
135
1,830
1.25 hours .......
4 hours ............
2.9 hours** .......
5.5 hours .........
1 hour ..............
875
200
7,888
743
1,830
900
900
20 minutes .......
300
30
10
2
5
4,500
500
100
40
26
10
10
5
25
30
10
2
5
4,500
500
100
40
26
10
10
5
25
3.5 hours .........
3.25 hours .......
6.5 hours .........
7 hours ............
1.5 hours .........
16 hours ..........
16 hours ..........
6 hours ............
40 hours ..........
20 hours ..........
2.25 hours .......
5 hours ............
2.5 hours .........
105
33
13
35
6,750
8,000
1,600
240
1,040
200
22
25
63
30
10
600
1,050
1,850
1,650
1,225
95
125
440
2,550
20
60
1,225
30
10
600
1,050
1,850
1,650
1,225
95
125
440
2,550
20
60
1,225
2 hours ............
1 hour ..............
1 hour ..............
30 minutes .......
1 hour ..............
3 hours ............
1.5 hours .........
30 minutes .......
30 minutes .......
1 hour ..............
1 hour ..............
1 hour ..............
1 hour ..............
1.5 hours .........
60
10
600
526
1,850
4,950
1,838
48
63
440
2,550
20
60
1,838
700
10
1,120
40
100
1,050
4,660
32,403
700
10
1,120
40
100
12,900
18,640
58,233
1 hour ..............
30 minutes .......
30 hours ..........
16 hours ..........
1 hour ..............
15 minutes .......
15 minutes .......
.....................
700
5
33,600
640
100
3,159
4,659
94,983
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
PO 00000
Completion time
per response
Dated: March 30, 2010
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. 2010–7807 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2010–N058; 30120–1113–0000
D2]
Approved Recovery Plan for the
Scaleshell Mussel
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
Notice of document availability.
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the approved recovery
plan for the scaleshell mussel (Leptodea
leptodon). The endangered scaleshell
mussel is now consistently found in
only the Meramec, Bourbeuse, and
Gasconade Rivers in Missouri. This plan
includes specific recovery objectives
and criteria to achieve removal of the
species from the protections of the
Endangered Species Act (Act).
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the recovery plan by sending a request
to Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ecological Services
Field Office, 101 Park DeVille Drive,
Suite A, Columbia, MO 65203 (printed
copies will be available for distribution
within 4 to 6 weeks), or by downloading
it from the Internet at: https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/recovery/
index.html#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Andy Roberts, by telephone at (573)
234–2132 ext. 110. TTY users may
contact Mr. Roberts through the Federal
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants to the point where
they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystems is a
primary goal of the Service’s
endangered species program. To help
guide the recovery effort, we are
working to prepare recovery plans for
most listed species native to the United
States. Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish
criteria for reclassification or delisting
listed species, and estimate time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed.
The Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
requires us to develop recovery plans
for listed species unless such a plan will
not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Section 4(f) of the
Act, as amended in 1988, requires us to
provide the public notice, and an
opportunity for public review and
comment, during recovery plan
development. We provided the draft
scaleshell recovery plan to the public
and solicited comments from August 6,
2004, through September 7, 2004 (69 FR
47949). We considered information we
received during the public comment
period, and information from peer
reviewers, in our preparation of the
recovery plan, and also summarized that
information in Appendix V of this
approved recovery plan.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
We listed the scaleshell as endangered
on October 9, 2001 (66 FR 51322). The
current distribution of the scaleshell is
limited to only three rivers in Missouri:
the Meramec, Bourbeuse, and
Gasconade. Surveys indicate that the
species is in decline throughout these
areas. In the last 25 years, it has been
reported from 15 additional streams in
Arkansas, Oklahoma, and South Dakota,
but only has been represented by a
small number or a single specimen (live
or dead) collected during one or more
extensive mussel surveys of these rivers.
The scaleshell occurs in medium-tolarge rivers with low-to-medium
gradients. It primarily inhabits stable
riffles and runs with gravel or mud
substrate and moderate current velocity.
The scaleshell requires good water
quality, and is usually found where a
diversity of other mussel species are
concentrated. More specific habitat
requirements of the scaleshell are
unknown, particularly of the juvenile
stage. Water quality degradation,
sedimentation, channel destabilization,
and habitat destruction are contributing
to the decline of the scaleshell
throughout its range. The spread of the
nonnative zebra mussel (Dreissena
polymorpha) may threaten scaleshell
populations in the near future.
The scaleshell must complete a
parasitic phase on freshwater drum
(Aplodinotus grunniens) to complete its
life cycle. The scaleshell’s complex life
cycle and extreme rarity hinders its
ability to reproduce. The sedentary
nature of the species and the low
density of remaining populations
exacerbate threats to its survival posed
by the natural and manmade factors.
Further, the relatively short life span of
the scaleshell may render it less able to
tolerate periods of poor recruitment.
The remaining populations are very
susceptible to local extirpation, with
little chance of recolonization because
of their scattered and isolated
distribution.
The principal recovery strategy is to
conserve existing habitat and restore
degraded habitat by addressing threats
immediately adjacent to occupied sites
and in upstream areas of occupied
watersheds. Stream reaches occupied by
the scaleshell have numerous and
widespread threats affecting the species.
In some cases, these threats are related
to the surrounding land use and can
originate upstream of extant
populations. Therefore, some recovery
actions may need to be implemented on
a large scale in order to restore aquatic
habitat downstream. Other recovery
actions include artificial propagation to
increase and stabilize populations, and
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17759
research on the biology, ecology, and
genetics of the species.
Recovery efforts on this scale will not
be possible without soliciting outside
help to restore aquatic habitat and
improve surface lands. The assistance of
Federal and State agencies, conservation
groups, local governments, private
landowners, industries, businesses, and
farming communities will be essential
in implementing the necessary recovery
actions for the scaleshell to meet
recovery goals. The role of private
landowners, nonprofit organizations,
and corporations cannot be
overemphasized, as most land in
watersheds occupied by the scaleshell is
under private ownership.
The scaleshell mussel will be
considered for delisting when section
4(a)(1) threat factors under the Act are
assessed and when the following criteria
are met:
(1) Through protection of existing
populations, successful establishment of
reintroduced populations, or the
discovery of additional populations, a
total of eight stream populations exist,
each in a separate watershed and each
made up of at least four local and
geographically distinct populations
with, at a minimum, one stream
population located in the Upper
Mississippi River Basin, four in the
Middle Mississippi River Basin (two of
these must exist east of the Mississippi
River), and three in the Lower
Mississippi River Basin;
(2) Each local population in Criterion
1 is viable in terms of population size,
age structure, recruitment, and
persistence; and
(3) Threats to local populations in
Criterion 1 have been identified and
addressed per measurable criteria
developed in the Recovery Plan.
We will achieve these criteria through
the following actions:
(1) Stabilizing existing populations
through artificial propagation to prevent
extirpation;
(2) Formation of partnerships and
utilization of existing programs to
protect remaining populations, restore
habitat, and improve surface lands;
(3) Improving understanding of the
biology and ecology of the scaleshell;
(4) Further delineating the current
status and distribution of the scaleshell;
(5) Restoring degraded habitat in areas
of historical range;
(6) Reintroducing the scaleshell into
portions of its former range;
(7) Initiating various educational and
public outreach actions to heighten
awareness of the scaleshell as an
endangered species and to solicit help
with recovery actions; and
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
17760
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
(8) Tracking recovery and conducting
periodic evaluations with respect to
recovery criteria.
Criteria are also provided in the
recovery plan to reclassify the scaleshell
mussel to threatened status. The species
will be considered for reclassification
when section 4(a)(1) threat factors under
the Act are assessed and when either of
the following criteria is met:
(1) Through protection of existing
populations, successful establishment of
reintroduced populations, or the
discovery of additional populations,
four stream populations exist, each in a
separate watershed and each made up of
at least four local populations located in
distinct portions of the stream;
(2) Each local population in Criterion
1 is viable in terms of population size,
age structure, recruitment, and
persistence; and
(3) Threats to local populations in
Criterion 1 have been identified and
addressed per the measurable criteria
developed in the Recovery Plan.
Authority: Sec. 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: March 18, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2010–7849 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–ES–2010–N055; 70120–1113–
0000–C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Spectacled Eider
(Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year
Status Review
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year
status review and request for
information.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
initiation of a 5-year status review for
the spectacled eider (Somateria
fischeri), a bird species listed as
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
We conduct 5-year reviews to ensure
that our classification of each species as
threatened or endangered on the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants is accurate. We request any
new information on this species that
may have a bearing on its classification
as threatened. Based on the results of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
this 5-year review, we will make a
finding on whether this species is
properly classified under the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct our 5-year review, we are
requesting that you submit your
information no later than June 7, 2010.
However, we accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to
submit information for our 5-year
review, see ‘‘Request for New
Information.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Laing, Endangered Species
Biologist, at the address under
‘‘Contacts’’or by phone at (907) 786–
3459.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We originally listed the spectacled
eider (Somateria fischeri) as threatened
under the Act on May 10, 1993 (58 FR
27474). For the description, taxonomy,
distribution, status, breeding biology
and habitat, and a summary of factors
affecting the species, please see the final
listing rule. A recovery plan was
completed on August 12, 1996. On
February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9146), we
designated critical habitat for the
species.
Three breeding populations have been
identified: In Arctic Russia (AR) on the
Siberian coast, and in Alaska on the
coastal zone of the Yukon-Kuskokwim
Delta (YKD) and on the Arctic Coastal
Plain (ACP). Molting occurs at sea in
nearshore waters. The wintering area is
in polynyas (openings in sea ice) in the
central Bering Sea south of St. Lawrence
Island.
The spectacled eider breeding
population on the YKD declined by 94–
98 percent between the early 1970s and
the 1993 listing date, from 47,700–
70,000 nesting pairs to 1,700–3,000
pairs. There were thought to be 3,000
pairs on the ACP in the 1970s. Although
there was no standard survey of the ACP
population in the early 1990s, there was
evidence of an 80 percent decline in
breeding birds at Prudhoe Bay between
1981 and 1991. The size of the AR
breeding population was unknown at
listing. The causes of these declines
were unknown; potential contributory
factors include harvest, ingestion of
spent lead shot, and predation.
Recovery actions in the recovery plan
focus on ameliorating these threats, and
on monitoring populations.
Since 1993, the YKD population has
varied, but apparently increased in the
last decade, with 4,991 (Standard Error
641) nesting pairs estimated in 2008.
The ACP population survey provides an
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
index of individual birds on breeding
grounds rather than nests. The estimate
in 2008 was 6,207 (Standard Error 592)
birds; no trend is evident since the
survey began in 1993. Aerial surveys in
Arctic Russia during the period 1993–
1995 provided an index of 146,245
birds.
II. Initiation of 5-Year Status Review
A. Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year
Review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we maintain a List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12
(for plants). An informational copy of
the List, which covers all listed species,
is also available on our Internet site at
https://endangered.fws.gov/
wildlife.html#Species. Section 4(c)(2)(A)
of the Act requires us to review the
status of each listed species at least once
every 5 years. Then, based on such
review, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we
determine whether any species should
be removed from the List (delisted),
reclassified from endangered to
threatened, or reclassified from
threatened to endangered. Any change
in Federal classification requires a
separate rulemaking process.
Our regulations in 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the species
we are reviewing. This notice
announces our active 5-year status
review of the threatened spectacled
eider.
B. What Information Do We Consider in
Our Review?
We consider the best scientific and
commercial data available at the time
we conduct our review. This includes
new information that has become
available since our current listing
determination or most recent status
review of the species, such as new
information regarding:
A. Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have
been implemented that benefit the
species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘How Do We
Determine Whether a Species is
Endangered or Threatened?’’); and
E. Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17758-17760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7849]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-ES-2010-N058; 30120-1113-0000 D2]
Approved Recovery Plan for the Scaleshell Mussel
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17759]]
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the approved recovery plan for the scaleshell mussel
(Leptodea leptodon). The endangered scaleshell mussel is now
consistently found in only the Meramec, Bourbeuse, and Gasconade Rivers
in Missouri. This plan includes specific recovery objectives and
criteria to achieve removal of the species from the protections of the
Endangered Species Act (Act).
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the recovery plan by sending a
request to Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological
Services Field Office, 101 Park DeVille Drive, Suite A, Columbia, MO
65203 (printed copies will be available for distribution within 4 to 6
weeks), or by downloading it from the Internet at: https://www.fws.gov/endangered/recovery/#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Andy Roberts, by telephone at
(573) 234-2132 ext. 110. TTY users may contact Mr. Roberts through the
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants to the
point where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of the Service's endangered species
program. To help guide the recovery effort, we are working to prepare
recovery plans for most listed species native to the United States.
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish criteria for reclassification or
delisting listed species, and estimate time and cost for implementing
the measures needed.
The Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires us to develop recovery
plans for listed species unless such a plan will not promote the
conservation of a particular species. Section 4(f) of the Act, as
amended in 1988, requires us to provide the public notice, and an
opportunity for public review and comment, during recovery plan
development. We provided the draft scaleshell recovery plan to the
public and solicited comments from August 6, 2004, through September 7,
2004 (69 FR 47949). We considered information we received during the
public comment period, and information from peer reviewers, in our
preparation of the recovery plan, and also summarized that information
in Appendix V of this approved recovery plan.
We listed the scaleshell as endangered on October 9, 2001 (66 FR
51322). The current distribution of the scaleshell is limited to only
three rivers in Missouri: the Meramec, Bourbeuse, and Gasconade.
Surveys indicate that the species is in decline throughout these areas.
In the last 25 years, it has been reported from 15 additional streams
in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and South Dakota, but only has been represented
by a small number or a single specimen (live or dead) collected during
one or more extensive mussel surveys of these rivers.
The scaleshell occurs in medium-to-large rivers with low-to-medium
gradients. It primarily inhabits stable riffles and runs with gravel or
mud substrate and moderate current velocity. The scaleshell requires
good water quality, and is usually found where a diversity of other
mussel species are concentrated. More specific habitat requirements of
the scaleshell are unknown, particularly of the juvenile stage. Water
quality degradation, sedimentation, channel destabilization, and
habitat destruction are contributing to the decline of the scaleshell
throughout its range. The spread of the nonnative zebra mussel
(Dreissena polymorpha) may threaten scaleshell populations in the near
future.
The scaleshell must complete a parasitic phase on freshwater drum
(Aplodinotus grunniens) to complete its life cycle. The scaleshell's
complex life cycle and extreme rarity hinders its ability to reproduce.
The sedentary nature of the species and the low density of remaining
populations exacerbate threats to its survival posed by the natural and
manmade factors. Further, the relatively short life span of the
scaleshell may render it less able to tolerate periods of poor
recruitment. The remaining populations are very susceptible to local
extirpation, with little chance of recolonization because of their
scattered and isolated distribution.
The principal recovery strategy is to conserve existing habitat and
restore degraded habitat by addressing threats immediately adjacent to
occupied sites and in upstream areas of occupied watersheds. Stream
reaches occupied by the scaleshell have numerous and widespread threats
affecting the species. In some cases, these threats are related to the
surrounding land use and can originate upstream of extant populations.
Therefore, some recovery actions may need to be implemented on a large
scale in order to restore aquatic habitat downstream. Other recovery
actions include artificial propagation to increase and stabilize
populations, and research on the biology, ecology, and genetics of the
species.
Recovery efforts on this scale will not be possible without
soliciting outside help to restore aquatic habitat and improve surface
lands. The assistance of Federal and State agencies, conservation
groups, local governments, private landowners, industries, businesses,
and farming communities will be essential in implementing the necessary
recovery actions for the scaleshell to meet recovery goals. The role of
private landowners, nonprofit organizations, and corporations cannot be
overemphasized, as most land in watersheds occupied by the scaleshell
is under private ownership.
The scaleshell mussel will be considered for delisting when section
4(a)(1) threat factors under the Act are assessed and when the
following criteria are met:
(1) Through protection of existing populations, successful
establishment of reintroduced populations, or the discovery of
additional populations, a total of eight stream populations exist, each
in a separate watershed and each made up of at least four local and
geographically distinct populations with, at a minimum, one stream
population located in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, four in the
Middle Mississippi River Basin (two of these must exist east of the
Mississippi River), and three in the Lower Mississippi River Basin;
(2) Each local population in Criterion 1 is viable in terms of
population size, age structure, recruitment, and persistence; and
(3) Threats to local populations in Criterion 1 have been
identified and addressed per measurable criteria developed in the
Recovery Plan.
We will achieve these criteria through the following actions:
(1) Stabilizing existing populations through artificial propagation
to prevent extirpation;
(2) Formation of partnerships and utilization of existing programs
to protect remaining populations, restore habitat, and improve surface
lands;
(3) Improving understanding of the biology and ecology of the
scaleshell;
(4) Further delineating the current status and distribution of the
scaleshell;
(5) Restoring degraded habitat in areas of historical range;
(6) Reintroducing the scaleshell into portions of its former range;
(7) Initiating various educational and public outreach actions to
heighten awareness of the scaleshell as an endangered species and to
solicit help with recovery actions; and
[[Page 17760]]
(8) Tracking recovery and conducting periodic evaluations with
respect to recovery criteria.
Criteria are also provided in the recovery plan to reclassify the
scaleshell mussel to threatened status. The species will be considered
for reclassification when section 4(a)(1) threat factors under the Act
are assessed and when either of the following criteria is met:
(1) Through protection of existing populations, successful
establishment of reintroduced populations, or the discovery of
additional populations, four stream populations exist, each in a
separate watershed and each made up of at least four local populations
located in distinct portions of the stream;
(2) Each local population in Criterion 1 is viable in terms of
population size, age structure, recruitment, and persistence; and
(3) Threats to local populations in Criterion 1 have been
identified and addressed per the measurable criteria developed in the
Recovery Plan.
Authority: Sec. 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C.
1533(f).
Dated: March 18, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-7849 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P