Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year Status Review, 17760-17761 [2010-7794]

Download as PDF 17760 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices (8) Tracking recovery and conducting periodic evaluations with respect to recovery criteria. Criteria are also provided in the recovery plan to reclassify the scaleshell mussel to threatened status. The species will be considered for reclassification when section 4(a)(1) threat factors under the Act are assessed and when either of the following criteria is met: (1) Through protection of existing populations, successful establishment of reintroduced populations, or the discovery of additional populations, four stream populations exist, each in a separate watershed and each made up of at least four local populations located in distinct portions of the stream; (2) Each local population in Criterion 1 is viable in terms of population size, age structure, recruitment, and persistence; and (3) Threats to local populations in Criterion 1 have been identified and addressed per the measurable criteria developed in the Recovery Plan. Authority: Sec. 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f). Dated: March 18, 2010. Lynn M. Lewis, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Midwest Region. [FR Doc. 2010–7849 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R7–ES–2010–N055; 70120–1113– 0000–C4] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year Status Review WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year status review and request for information. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the initiation of a 5-year status review for the spectacled eider (Somateria fischeri), a bird species listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We conduct 5-year reviews to ensure that our classification of each species as threatened or endangered on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants is accurate. We request any new information on this species that may have a bearing on its classification as threatened. Based on the results of VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:18 Apr 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 this 5-year review, we will make a finding on whether this species is properly classified under the Act. DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct our 5-year review, we are requesting that you submit your information no later than June 7, 2010. However, we accept new information about any listed species at any time. ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to submit information for our 5-year review, see ‘‘Request for New Information.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Laing, Endangered Species Biologist, at the address under ‘‘Contacts’’or by phone at (907) 786– 3459. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background We originally listed the spectacled eider (Somateria fischeri) as threatened under the Act on May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27474). For the description, taxonomy, distribution, status, breeding biology and habitat, and a summary of factors affecting the species, please see the final listing rule. A recovery plan was completed on August 12, 1996. On February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9146), we designated critical habitat for the species. Three breeding populations have been identified: In Arctic Russia (AR) on the Siberian coast, and in Alaska on the coastal zone of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD) and on the Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP). Molting occurs at sea in nearshore waters. The wintering area is in polynyas (openings in sea ice) in the central Bering Sea south of St. Lawrence Island. The spectacled eider breeding population on the YKD declined by 94– 98 percent between the early 1970s and the 1993 listing date, from 47,700– 70,000 nesting pairs to 1,700–3,000 pairs. There were thought to be 3,000 pairs on the ACP in the 1970s. Although there was no standard survey of the ACP population in the early 1990s, there was evidence of an 80 percent decline in breeding birds at Prudhoe Bay between 1981 and 1991. The size of the AR breeding population was unknown at listing. The causes of these declines were unknown; potential contributory factors include harvest, ingestion of spent lead shot, and predation. Recovery actions in the recovery plan focus on ameliorating these threats, and on monitoring populations. Since 1993, the YKD population has varied, but apparently increased in the last decade, with 4,991 (Standard Error 641) nesting pairs estimated in 2008. The ACP population survey provides an PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 index of individual birds on breeding grounds rather than nests. The estimate in 2008 was 6,207 (Standard Error 592) birds; no trend is evident since the survey began in 1993. Aerial surveys in Arctic Russia during the period 1993– 1995 provided an index of 146,245 birds. II. Initiation of 5-Year Status Review A. Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year Review? Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain a List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). An informational copy of the List, which covers all listed species, is also available on our Internet site at https://endangered.fws.gov/ wildlife.html#Species. Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires us to review the status of each listed species at least once every 5 years. Then, based on such review, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether any species should be removed from the List (delisted), reclassified from endangered to threatened, or reclassified from threatened to endangered. Any change in Federal classification requires a separate rulemaking process. Our regulations in 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing. This notice announces our active 5-year status review of the threatened spectacled eider. B. What Information Do We Consider in Our Review? We consider the best scientific and commercial data available at the time we conduct our review. This includes new information that has become available since our current listing determination or most recent status review of the species, such as new information regarding: A. Species biology, including but not limited to population trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics; B. Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount, distribution, and suitability; C. Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit the species; D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ‘‘How Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened?’’); and E. Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices identification of erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical methods. C. How Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened? Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five following factors: A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; C. Disease or predation; D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we are required to base our assessment of these factors solely on the best scientific and commercial data available. WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES D. What Could Happen as a Result of Our Review? For each species we review, if we find new information indicating a change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a new rule that could do one of the following: A. Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist); B. Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened (downlist); or C. Remove the species from the List (delist). If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted, then the species remains on the List under its current status. We must support any delisting by the best scientific and commercial data available, and only consider delisting if such data substantiate that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more of the following reasons: A. The species is considered extinct; B. The species is considered to be recovered; and/or C. The original data available when the species was listed, or the interpretation of such data, were in error (50 CFR 424.11(d)). E. Request for New Information To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we request new information from the public, governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, environmental entities, industry, and any other interested parties concerning the status of the species. See ‘‘What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?’’ for specific VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:18 Apr 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 17761 criteria. If you submit information, support it with documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources. Submit your comments and materials to office listed under ‘‘Contacts.’’ V. Authority We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). F. Public Availability of Comments [FR Doc. 2010–7794 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am] Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the offices where we receive comments. BILLING CODE 4310–55–P III. Contacts Submit your comments and information on this species, as well as any request for information, by any one of the following methods. You may also view information and comments we receive in response to this notice, as well as other documentation in our files, at the following locations by appointment, during normal business hours. E-mail: Karen_laing@fws.gov; Use ‘‘spectacled eider’’ as the message subject line. Fax: Attn: Karen Laing, (907) 786– 3848. U.S. mail: Karen Laing, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS–361, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503. In-Person drop-off or Document review/pickup: You may drop off comments and information, review/ obtain documents, or view received comments during regular business hours at the above address. IV. Definitions (A) Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate, which interbreeds when mature; (B) Endangered means any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range; and (C) Threatened means any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: March 30, 2010. Gary Edwards, Acting Regional Director, Region 7, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Termination of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the General Management Plan (GMP) for Kings Mountain National Military Park (Park), South Carolina AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is terminating preparation of an EIS for the GMP for the Park, South Carolina. A Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the Park GMP was published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2006 (71 FR 63350), and followed by a scoping newsletter. The NPS has since determined that an Environmental Assessment rather than an EIS is the appropriate level of environmental documentation for the plan. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GMP will establish the overall management direction for the next 15 to 20 years. Two scoping information meetings were conducted on May 6 & 7, 2008, with stakeholders and the general public at Kings Mountain, North Carolina, and York, South Carolina. Initial scoping did not result in significant impacts being identified by the public. Additionally, the preliminary analysis of the alternatives does not indicate that significant impacts will result from implementation of any of the alternatives. The NPS planning team has developed two action alternatives, in addition to the no-action alternative (Alternative A) which represents the continuation of current management policies and practices. Alternative B would expand interpretive programs and materials to include the continuum of human history at the site, while continuing to focus the park’s primary efforts on the 1780 battle. In addition, more interpretation of the natural history and environment of the site would be included in the park’s interpretive program. Alternative C would broaden the interpretive E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17760-17761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R7-ES-2010-N055; 70120-1113-0000-C4]


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Spectacled Eider 
(Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year Status Review

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year status review and request for 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 
initiation of a 5-year status review for the spectacled eider 
(Somateria fischeri), a bird species listed as threatened under the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We conduct 5-year 
reviews to ensure that our classification of each species as threatened 
or endangered on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
Plants is accurate. We request any new information on this species that 
may have a bearing on its classification as threatened. Based on the 
results of this 5-year review, we will make a finding on whether this 
species is properly classified under the Act.

DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct our 5-year review, we are 
requesting that you submit your information no later than June 7, 2010. 
However, we accept new information about any listed species at any 
time.

ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to submit information for our 5-year 
review, see ``Request for New Information.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Laing, Endangered Species 
Biologist, at the address under ``Contacts''or by phone at (907) 786-
3459.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    We originally listed the spectacled eider (Somateria fischeri) as 
threatened under the Act on May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27474). For the 
description, taxonomy, distribution, status, breeding biology and 
habitat, and a summary of factors affecting the species, please see the 
final listing rule. A recovery plan was completed on August 12, 1996. 
On February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9146), we designated critical habitat for 
the species.
    Three breeding populations have been identified: In Arctic Russia 
(AR) on the Siberian coast, and in Alaska on the coastal zone of the 
Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD) and on the Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP). 
Molting occurs at sea in nearshore waters. The wintering area is in 
polynyas (openings in sea ice) in the central Bering Sea south of St. 
Lawrence Island.
    The spectacled eider breeding population on the YKD declined by 94-
98 percent between the early 1970s and the 1993 listing date, from 
47,700-70,000 nesting pairs to 1,700-3,000 pairs. There were thought to 
be 3,000 pairs on the ACP in the 1970s. Although there was no standard 
survey of the ACP population in the early 1990s, there was evidence of 
an 80 percent decline in breeding birds at Prudhoe Bay between 1981 and 
1991. The size of the AR breeding population was unknown at listing. 
The causes of these declines were unknown; potential contributory 
factors include harvest, ingestion of spent lead shot, and predation. 
Recovery actions in the recovery plan focus on ameliorating these 
threats, and on monitoring populations.
    Since 1993, the YKD population has varied, but apparently increased 
in the last decade, with 4,991 (Standard Error 641) nesting pairs 
estimated in 2008. The ACP population survey provides an index of 
individual birds on breeding grounds rather than nests. The estimate in 
2008 was 6,207 (Standard Error 592) birds; no trend is evident since 
the survey began in 1993. Aerial surveys in Arctic Russia during the 
period 1993-1995 provided an index of 146,245 birds.

II. Initiation of 5-Year Status Review

A. Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year Review?

    Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain a List of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) in the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for 
plants). An informational copy of the List, which covers all listed 
species, is also available on our Internet site at https://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html#Species. Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act 
requires us to review the status of each listed species at least once 
every 5 years. Then, based on such review, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we 
determine whether any species should be removed from the List 
(delisted), reclassified from endangered to threatened, or reclassified 
from threatened to endangered. Any change in Federal classification 
requires a separate rulemaking process.
    Our regulations in 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice 
in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing. This 
notice announces our active 5-year status review of the threatened 
spectacled eider.

B. What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?

    We consider the best scientific and commercial data available at 
the time we conduct our review. This includes new information that has 
become available since our current listing determination or most recent 
status review of the species, such as new information regarding:
    A. Species biology, including but not limited to population trends, 
distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
    B. Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount, 
distribution, and suitability;
    C. Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit 
the species;
    D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How 
Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened?''); and
    E. Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not 
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,

[[Page 17761]]

identification of erroneous information contained in the List, and 
improved analytical methods.

C. How Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened?

    Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a 
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five 
following factors:
    A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or 
curtailment of its habitat or range;
    B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or 
educational purposes;
    C. Disease or predation;
    D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
    E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued 
existence.

Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we are required to base our 
assessment of these factors solely on the best scientific and 
commercial data available.

D. What Could Happen as a Result of Our Review?

    For each species we review, if we find new information indicating a 
change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a new rule 
that could do one of the following:
    A. Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist);
    B. Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened (downlist); 
or
    C. Remove the species from the List (delist).

If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted, then 
the species remains on the List under its current status.
    We must support any delisting by the best scientific and commercial 
data available, and only consider delisting if such data substantiate 
that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more 
of the following reasons:
    A. The species is considered extinct;
    B. The species is considered to be recovered; and/or
    C. The original data available when the species was listed, or the 
interpretation of such data, were in error (50 CFR 424.11(d)).

E. Request for New Information

    To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best 
available scientific and commercial information, we request new 
information from the public, governmental agencies, Tribes, the 
scientific community, environmental entities, industry, and any other 
interested parties concerning the status of the species.
    See ``What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?'' for specific 
criteria. If you submit information, support it with documentation such 
as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather and analyze 
the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports, or 
letters by knowledgeable sources.
    Submit your comments and materials to office listed under 
``Contacts.''

F. Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for 
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the 
offices where we receive comments.

III. Contacts

    Submit your comments and information on this species, as well as 
any request for information, by any one of the following methods. You 
may also view information and comments we receive in response to this 
notice, as well as other documentation in our files, at the following 
locations by appointment, during normal business hours.
    E-mail: Karen_laing@fws.gov; Use ``spectacled eider'' as the 
message subject line.
    Fax: Attn: Karen Laing, (907) 786-3848.
    U.S. mail: Karen Laing, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS-361, 
1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503.
    In-Person drop-off or Document review/pickup: You may drop off 
comments and information, review/obtain documents, or view received 
comments during regular business hours at the above address.

IV. Definitions

    (A) Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife, 
or plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of 
vertebrate, which interbreeds when mature; (B) Endangered means any 
species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant 
portion of its range; and
    (C) Threatened means any species that is likely to become an 
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a 
significant portion of its range.

V. Authority

    We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: March 30, 2010.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, Region 7, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-7794 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.