Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year Status Review, 17760-17761 [2010-7794]
Download as PDF
17760
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
(8) Tracking recovery and conducting
periodic evaluations with respect to
recovery criteria.
Criteria are also provided in the
recovery plan to reclassify the scaleshell
mussel to threatened status. The species
will be considered for reclassification
when section 4(a)(1) threat factors under
the Act are assessed and when either of
the following criteria is met:
(1) Through protection of existing
populations, successful establishment of
reintroduced populations, or the
discovery of additional populations,
four stream populations exist, each in a
separate watershed and each made up of
at least four local populations located in
distinct portions of the stream;
(2) Each local population in Criterion
1 is viable in terms of population size,
age structure, recruitment, and
persistence; and
(3) Threats to local populations in
Criterion 1 have been identified and
addressed per the measurable criteria
developed in the Recovery Plan.
Authority: Sec. 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: March 18, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2010–7849 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–ES–2010–N055; 70120–1113–
0000–C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Spectacled Eider
(Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year
Status Review
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year
status review and request for
information.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
initiation of a 5-year status review for
the spectacled eider (Somateria
fischeri), a bird species listed as
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
We conduct 5-year reviews to ensure
that our classification of each species as
threatened or endangered on the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants is accurate. We request any
new information on this species that
may have a bearing on its classification
as threatened. Based on the results of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
this 5-year review, we will make a
finding on whether this species is
properly classified under the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct our 5-year review, we are
requesting that you submit your
information no later than June 7, 2010.
However, we accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to
submit information for our 5-year
review, see ‘‘Request for New
Information.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Laing, Endangered Species
Biologist, at the address under
‘‘Contacts’’or by phone at (907) 786–
3459.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We originally listed the spectacled
eider (Somateria fischeri) as threatened
under the Act on May 10, 1993 (58 FR
27474). For the description, taxonomy,
distribution, status, breeding biology
and habitat, and a summary of factors
affecting the species, please see the final
listing rule. A recovery plan was
completed on August 12, 1996. On
February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9146), we
designated critical habitat for the
species.
Three breeding populations have been
identified: In Arctic Russia (AR) on the
Siberian coast, and in Alaska on the
coastal zone of the Yukon-Kuskokwim
Delta (YKD) and on the Arctic Coastal
Plain (ACP). Molting occurs at sea in
nearshore waters. The wintering area is
in polynyas (openings in sea ice) in the
central Bering Sea south of St. Lawrence
Island.
The spectacled eider breeding
population on the YKD declined by 94–
98 percent between the early 1970s and
the 1993 listing date, from 47,700–
70,000 nesting pairs to 1,700–3,000
pairs. There were thought to be 3,000
pairs on the ACP in the 1970s. Although
there was no standard survey of the ACP
population in the early 1990s, there was
evidence of an 80 percent decline in
breeding birds at Prudhoe Bay between
1981 and 1991. The size of the AR
breeding population was unknown at
listing. The causes of these declines
were unknown; potential contributory
factors include harvest, ingestion of
spent lead shot, and predation.
Recovery actions in the recovery plan
focus on ameliorating these threats, and
on monitoring populations.
Since 1993, the YKD population has
varied, but apparently increased in the
last decade, with 4,991 (Standard Error
641) nesting pairs estimated in 2008.
The ACP population survey provides an
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
index of individual birds on breeding
grounds rather than nests. The estimate
in 2008 was 6,207 (Standard Error 592)
birds; no trend is evident since the
survey began in 1993. Aerial surveys in
Arctic Russia during the period 1993–
1995 provided an index of 146,245
birds.
II. Initiation of 5-Year Status Review
A. Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year
Review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we maintain a List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12
(for plants). An informational copy of
the List, which covers all listed species,
is also available on our Internet site at
https://endangered.fws.gov/
wildlife.html#Species. Section 4(c)(2)(A)
of the Act requires us to review the
status of each listed species at least once
every 5 years. Then, based on such
review, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we
determine whether any species should
be removed from the List (delisted),
reclassified from endangered to
threatened, or reclassified from
threatened to endangered. Any change
in Federal classification requires a
separate rulemaking process.
Our regulations in 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing the species
we are reviewing. This notice
announces our active 5-year status
review of the threatened spectacled
eider.
B. What Information Do We Consider in
Our Review?
We consider the best scientific and
commercial data available at the time
we conduct our review. This includes
new information that has become
available since our current listing
determination or most recent status
review of the species, such as new
information regarding:
A. Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have
been implemented that benefit the
species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘How Do We
Determine Whether a Species is
Endangered or Threatened?’’); and
E. Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
identification of erroneous information
contained in the List, and improved
analytical methods.
C. How Do We Determine Whether a
Species is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors:
A. The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we are
required to base our assessment of these
factors solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
D. What Could Happen as a Result of
Our Review?
For each species we review, if we find
new information indicating a change in
classification may be warranted, we may
propose a new rule that could do one of
the following:
A. Reclassify the species from
threatened to endangered (uplist);
B. Reclassify the species from
endangered to threatened (downlist); or
C. Remove the species from the List
(delist).
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species remains on the List under its
current status.
We must support any delisting by the
best scientific and commercial data
available, and only consider delisting if
such data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons:
A. The species is considered extinct;
B. The species is considered to be
recovered; and/or
C. The original data available when
the species was listed, or the
interpretation of such data, were in error
(50 CFR 424.11(d)).
E. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we request new
information from the public,
governmental agencies, Tribes, the
scientific community, environmental
entities, industry, and any other
interested parties concerning the status
of the species.
See ‘‘What Information Do We
Consider in Our Review?’’ for specific
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
17761
criteria. If you submit information,
support it with documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data,
and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources.
Submit your comments and materials
to office listed under ‘‘Contacts.’’
V. Authority
We publish this notice under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
F. Public Availability of Comments
[FR Doc. 2010–7794 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the offices where we receive
comments.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
III. Contacts
Submit your comments and
information on this species, as well as
any request for information, by any one
of the following methods. You may also
view information and comments we
receive in response to this notice, as
well as other documentation in our files,
at the following locations by
appointment, during normal business
hours.
E-mail: Karen_laing@fws.gov; Use
‘‘spectacled eider’’ as the message
subject line.
Fax: Attn: Karen Laing, (907) 786–
3848.
U.S. mail: Karen Laing, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS–361, 1011 E.
Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person drop-off or Document
review/pickup: You may drop off
comments and information, review/
obtain documents, or view received
comments during regular business hours
at the above address.
IV. Definitions
(A) Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, which
interbreeds when mature; (B)
Endangered means any species that is in
danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range; and
(C) Threatened means any species
that is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: March 30, 2010.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, Region 7, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Termination of an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the General
Management Plan (GMP) for Kings
Mountain National Military Park (Park),
South Carolina
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) is terminating preparation of an
EIS for the GMP for the Park, South
Carolina. A Notice of Intent to prepare
an EIS for the Park GMP was published
in the Federal Register on October 10,
2006 (71 FR 63350), and followed by a
scoping newsletter. The NPS has since
determined that an Environmental
Assessment rather than an EIS is the
appropriate level of environmental
documentation for the plan.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GMP
will establish the overall management
direction for the next 15 to 20 years.
Two scoping information meetings were
conducted on May 6 & 7, 2008, with
stakeholders and the general public at
Kings Mountain, North Carolina, and
York, South Carolina. Initial scoping did
not result in significant impacts being
identified by the public. Additionally,
the preliminary analysis of the
alternatives does not indicate that
significant impacts will result from
implementation of any of the
alternatives. The NPS planning team has
developed two action alternatives, in
addition to the no-action alternative
(Alternative A) which represents the
continuation of current management
policies and practices. Alternative B
would expand interpretive programs
and materials to include the continuum
of human history at the site, while
continuing to focus the park’s primary
efforts on the 1780 battle. In addition,
more interpretation of the natural
history and environment of the site
would be included in the park’s
interpretive program. Alternative C
would broaden the interpretive
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17760-17761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7794]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-ES-2010-N055; 70120-1113-0000-C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Spectacled Eider
(Somateria fischeri): Initiation of 5-Year Status Review
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of 5-year status review and request for
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
initiation of a 5-year status review for the spectacled eider
(Somateria fischeri), a bird species listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We conduct 5-year
reviews to ensure that our classification of each species as threatened
or endangered on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants is accurate. We request any new information on this species that
may have a bearing on its classification as threatened. Based on the
results of this 5-year review, we will make a finding on whether this
species is properly classified under the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct our 5-year review, we are
requesting that you submit your information no later than June 7, 2010.
However, we accept new information about any listed species at any
time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to submit information for our 5-year
review, see ``Request for New Information.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Laing, Endangered Species
Biologist, at the address under ``Contacts''or by phone at (907) 786-
3459.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We originally listed the spectacled eider (Somateria fischeri) as
threatened under the Act on May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27474). For the
description, taxonomy, distribution, status, breeding biology and
habitat, and a summary of factors affecting the species, please see the
final listing rule. A recovery plan was completed on August 12, 1996.
On February 6, 2001 (66 FR 9146), we designated critical habitat for
the species.
Three breeding populations have been identified: In Arctic Russia
(AR) on the Siberian coast, and in Alaska on the coastal zone of the
Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (YKD) and on the Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP).
Molting occurs at sea in nearshore waters. The wintering area is in
polynyas (openings in sea ice) in the central Bering Sea south of St.
Lawrence Island.
The spectacled eider breeding population on the YKD declined by 94-
98 percent between the early 1970s and the 1993 listing date, from
47,700-70,000 nesting pairs to 1,700-3,000 pairs. There were thought to
be 3,000 pairs on the ACP in the 1970s. Although there was no standard
survey of the ACP population in the early 1990s, there was evidence of
an 80 percent decline in breeding birds at Prudhoe Bay between 1981 and
1991. The size of the AR breeding population was unknown at listing.
The causes of these declines were unknown; potential contributory
factors include harvest, ingestion of spent lead shot, and predation.
Recovery actions in the recovery plan focus on ameliorating these
threats, and on monitoring populations.
Since 1993, the YKD population has varied, but apparently increased
in the last decade, with 4,991 (Standard Error 641) nesting pairs
estimated in 2008. The ACP population survey provides an index of
individual birds on breeding grounds rather than nests. The estimate in
2008 was 6,207 (Standard Error 592) birds; no trend is evident since
the survey began in 1993. Aerial surveys in Arctic Russia during the
period 1993-1995 provided an index of 146,245 birds.
II. Initiation of 5-Year Status Review
A. Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year Review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain a List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (List) in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for
plants). An informational copy of the List, which covers all listed
species, is also available on our Internet site at https://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html#Species. Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires us to review the status of each listed species at least once
every 5 years. Then, based on such review, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we
determine whether any species should be removed from the List
(delisted), reclassified from endangered to threatened, or reclassified
from threatened to endangered. Any change in Federal classification
requires a separate rulemaking process.
Our regulations in 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing the species we are reviewing. This
notice announces our active 5-year status review of the threatened
spectacled eider.
B. What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?
We consider the best scientific and commercial data available at
the time we conduct our review. This includes new information that has
become available since our current listing determination or most recent
status review of the species, such as new information regarding:
A. Species biology, including but not limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit
the species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How
Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened?''); and
E. Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
[[Page 17761]]
identification of erroneous information contained in the List, and
improved analytical methods.
C. How Do We Determine Whether a Species is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the five
following factors:
A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
Under section 4(b)(1) of the Act, we are required to base our
assessment of these factors solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available.
D. What Could Happen as a Result of Our Review?
For each species we review, if we find new information indicating a
change in classification may be warranted, we may propose a new rule
that could do one of the following:
A. Reclassify the species from threatened to endangered (uplist);
B. Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened (downlist);
or
C. Remove the species from the List (delist).
If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted, then
the species remains on the List under its current status.
We must support any delisting by the best scientific and commercial
data available, and only consider delisting if such data substantiate
that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for one or more
of the following reasons:
A. The species is considered extinct;
B. The species is considered to be recovered; and/or
C. The original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of such data, were in error (50 CFR 424.11(d)).
E. Request for New Information
To ensure that a 5-year review is complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial information, we request new
information from the public, governmental agencies, Tribes, the
scientific community, environmental entities, industry, and any other
interested parties concerning the status of the species.
See ``What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?'' for specific
criteria. If you submit information, support it with documentation such
as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather and analyze
the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports, or
letters by knowledgeable sources.
Submit your comments and materials to office listed under
``Contacts.''
F. Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
offices where we receive comments.
III. Contacts
Submit your comments and information on this species, as well as
any request for information, by any one of the following methods. You
may also view information and comments we receive in response to this
notice, as well as other documentation in our files, at the following
locations by appointment, during normal business hours.
E-mail: Karen_laing@fws.gov; Use ``spectacled eider'' as the
message subject line.
Fax: Attn: Karen Laing, (907) 786-3848.
U.S. mail: Karen Laing, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS-361,
1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person drop-off or Document review/pickup: You may drop off
comments and information, review/obtain documents, or view received
comments during regular business hours at the above address.
IV. Definitions
(A) Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife,
or plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of
vertebrate, which interbreeds when mature; (B) Endangered means any
species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range; and
(C) Threatened means any species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
V. Authority
We publish this notice under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 30, 2010.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, Region 7, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-7794 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P