Motorcyclist Advisory Council to the Federal Highway Administration, 17829-17830 [2010-7777]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
errors so that they will not be repeated
in future production.
In summation, Michelin states that it
believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety that no corrective
action is warranted.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with Michelin that
the noncompliances are inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety. The agency
believes that the true measure of
inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
safety in this case is that there is no
effect of the noncompliances on the
operational safety of vehicles on which
these tires are mounted. The safety of
people working in the tire retread,
repair, and recycling industries must
also be considered. Although tire
construction affects the strength and
durability, neither the agency nor the
tire industry provides information
relating tire strength and durability to
the number of plies and types of ply
cord material in the tread and sidewall.
Therefore, tire dealers and customers
should consider the tire construction
information along with other
information such as the load capacity,
maximum inflation pressure, and tread
wear, temperature, and traction ratings,
to assess performance capabilities of
various tires. In the agency’s judgment,
the incorrect labeling of the tire
construction information will have an
inconsequential effect on motor vehicle
safety because most consumers do not
base tire purchases or vehicle operation
parameters on the ply material in a tire.
The agency also believes the
noncompliance will have no measurable
effect on the safety of the tire retread,
repair, and recycling industries. The use
of steel cord construction in the
sidewall and tread is the primary safety
concern of these industries. In this case,
since the tire sidewalls are marked
correctly for the number of steel plies,
this potential safety concern does not
exist.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that Michelin has
met its burden of persuasion that the
subject FMVSS No. 139 labeling
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
Michelin’s petition is granted and the
petitioner is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, the subject
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued on: April 1, 2010.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010–7875 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2005–23112]
Motorcyclist Advisory Council to the
Federal Highway Administration
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting of advisory
committee.
SUMMARY: This document announces the
eighth meeting of the Motorcyclist
Advisory Council to the Federal
Highway Administration (MAC–
FHWA). The purpose of this meeting is
to advise the Secretary of
Transportation, through the
Administrator of the FHWA, on
infrastructure issues of concern to
motorcyclists, including: (1) Barrier
design; (2) road design, construction,
and maintenance practices; and (3) the
architecture and implementation of
intelligent transportation system
technologies, pursuant to section 1914
of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU).
DATES: The eighth meeting of the MAC–
FHWA is scheduled for May 13 from 9
a.m. until 5 p.m. This meeting will be
the final meeting of the MAC–FHWA
under the SAFETEA–LU Authorization.
ADDRESSES: The eighth MAC–FHWA
meeting will be held at the Crystal City
Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, VA 22202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael Griffith, the Designated Federal
Official, Office of Safety, (202) 366–
2288, mike.griffith@dot.gov, or Mr.
Keith D. Williams, Office of Safety,
(202) 366–9212, keith.williams@dot.gov,
FHWA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On August 10, 2005, the President
signed into law the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
(Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144). Section
1914 of SAFETEA–LU mandates the
establishment of the Motorcyclist
Advisory Council as follows: ‘‘The
Secretary, acting through the
Administrator of the Federal Highway
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17829
Administration, in consultation with the
Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the
Senate, shall appoint a Motorcyclist
Advisory Council to coordinate with
and advise the Administrator on
infrastructure issues of concern to
motorcyclists, including—
(1) Barrier design;
(2) Road design, construction, and
maintenance practices; and
(3) The architecture and
implementation of intelligent
transportation system technologies.’’
In addition, section 1914 specifies the
membership of the council: ‘‘The
Council shall consist of not more than
10 members of the motorcycling
community with professional expertise
in national motorcyclist safety
advocacy, including—
(1) At least—
(A) One member recommended by a
national motorcyclist association;
(B) One member recommended by a
national motorcycle rider’s foundation;
(C) One representative of the National
Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Administrators;
(D) Two members of State
motorcyclists’ organizations;
(E) One member recommended by a
national organization that represents the
builders of highway infrastructure;
(F) One member recommended by a
national association that represents the
traffic safety systems industry; and
(G) One member of a national safety
organization; and
(2) At least one, and not more than
two, motorcyclists who are traffic
system design engineers or State
transportation department officials.’’
To carry out this requirement, the
FHWA published a notice of intent to
form an advisory committee in the
Federal Register on December 23, 2005
(70 FR 76353). This notice, consistent
with the requirements of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, announced
the establishment of the Council and
invited comments and nominations for
membership. The MAC–FHWA was
officially chartered for a 2-year period
on July 31, 2006, and was extended by
act of the Secretary for an additional 2year term. That extension expires on
July 31, 2010. The FHWA announced
the ten members selected to the Council
in the Federal Register on October 5,
2006 (71 FR 58903). An electronic copy
of this document and the previous
Federal Register notices associated with
the MAC–FHWA can be downloaded
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at: https://www.regulations.gov and the
Office of the Federal Register’s home
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
17830
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 7, 2010 / Notices
page at: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register.
The FHWA anticipates that the MAC–
FHWA will meet at least once a year,
with meetings held in the Washington,
DC, metropolitan area and the FHWA
will publish notices in the Federal
Register to announce the times, dates,
and locations of these meetings.
Meetings of the Council are open to the
public and time will be provided in
each meeting’s schedule for comments
by members of the public. Attendance
will necessarily be limited by the size of
the meeting room. Members of the
public may present oral or written
comments at the meeting or may present
written materials by providing copies to
Ms. Fran Bents, Westat, 1650 Research
Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850–3195,
(240) 314–7557, ten (10) days prior to
the meeting.
The agenda topics for the meetings
will include a discussion of the
following issues: (1) Barrier design; (2)
road design, construction, and
maintenance practices; and (3) the
architecture and implementation of
intelligent transportation system
technologies.
Conclusion
The eighth meeting of the
Motorcyclist Advisory Council to the
Federal Highway Administration will be
held on May 13, 2010, at the Crystal
City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 from 9
a.m. until 5 p.m.
(Authority: Section 1914 of Pub. L. 109–59;
Public L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App. II § 1)
Issued on: March 29, 2010.
Victor M. Mendez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–7777 Filed 4–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0024; Notice 1]
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Continental Tire North America, Inc.,
Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Continental Tire North America,
Inc.,(Continental), has determined that
certain passenger car tires manufactured
between March of 2007 and June of
2009 did not fully comply with
paragraphs S5.5(e) and S5.5(f) of Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) No. 139, New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles.
Continental has filed an appropriate
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:18 Apr 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), Continental has
petitioned for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of
49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
this noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Continental’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are approximately 28,169
size 235/55R18 100V SL Continental
brand CrossContact UHP model
passenger car tires manufactured
between March of 2007 and June of
2009 at Continental’s plant located in
Otrokovice, Czech Republic. A total of
8,858 of these tires have been delivered
to Continental’s customers. The
remaining tires (approximately 19,311)
are being held in Continental’s
possession until they can be correctly
relabeled.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore,
these provisions only apply to the tires
that have already passed from the
manufacturer to an owner, purchaser, or
dealer.
Paragraphs S5.5(e) and S5.5(f) of
FMVSS No. 139 require in pertinent
part:
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
paragraphs (a) through (i) of S5.5, each tire
must be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in S5.5(a) through (d)
and on one sidewall with the information
specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this
standard. The markings must be placed
between the maximum section width and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area that is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, those markings must
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings must be in letters and numerals not
less than 0.078 inches high and raised above
or sunk below the tire surface not less than
0.015 inches * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(e) The generic name of each cord material
used in the plies (both sidewall and tread
area) of the tire;
(f) The actual number of plies in the
sidewall, and the actual number of plies in
the tread area, if different * * *
Continental explains that the
noncompliance is that, due to a mold
stamping anomaly, the sidewall marking
on the tires incorrectly describes the
actual generic name and number of the
body plies. Specifically, the tires in
question were inadvertently
manufactured with ‘‘TREAD 6 PLIES: 2
POLYESTER + 2 STEEL + 2 NYLON;
SIDEWALL 2 PLY POLYESTER.’’ The
labeling should have been ‘‘TREAD 5
PLIES: 1 RAYON + 2 STEEL + 2
NYLON; SIDEWALL 1 PLY RAYON.’’
Continental states that all other sidewall
identification markings and safety
information are correct.
Continental states that it discovered
the mold stamping problem that caused
the non-compliance during a
specification change.
Continental argues that this noncompliant sidewall marking is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety
as it ‘‘does not affect the safety,
performance and durability of the tire;
the tires were built as designed.’’ In
addition, Continental states that the
tires comply with all other NHTSA
requirements.
Continental said that it performs
ongoing compliance testing ‘‘to assure
tire performance’’ and that ‘‘all tires
included in this petition will meet or
exceed the performance requirements of
FMVSS 139.’’ Continental further states
that ‘‘there will be no operational impact
on the performance or safety of vehicles
on which these tires are mounted.’’
Continental points out that NHTSA
has previously granted similar petitions
for non-compliances in sidewall
marking.
Continental also stated that it has
corrected the problem that caused these
errors so that they will not be repeated
in future production.
In summation, Continental states that
it believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety that no corrective
action is warranted.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments
must refer to the docket and notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17829-17830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7777]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2005-23112]
Motorcyclist Advisory Council to the Federal Highway
Administration
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting of advisory committee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the eighth meeting of the Motorcyclist
Advisory Council to the Federal Highway Administration (MAC-FHWA). The
purpose of this meeting is to advise the Secretary of Transportation,
through the Administrator of the FHWA, on infrastructure issues of
concern to motorcyclists, including: (1) Barrier design; (2) road
design, construction, and maintenance practices; and (3) the
architecture and implementation of intelligent transportation system
technologies, pursuant to section 1914 of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU).
DATES: The eighth meeting of the MAC-FHWA is scheduled for May 13 from
9 a.m. until 5 p.m. This meeting will be the final meeting of the MAC-
FHWA under the SAFETEA-LU Authorization.
ADDRESSES: The eighth MAC-FHWA meeting will be held at the Crystal City
Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Griffith, the Designated
Federal Official, Office of Safety, (202) 366-2288,
mike.griffith@dot.gov, or Mr. Keith D. Williams, Office of Safety,
(202) 366-9212, keith.williams@dot.gov, FHWA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On August 10, 2005, the President signed into law the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144). Section 1914
of SAFETEA-LU mandates the establishment of the Motorcyclist Advisory
Council as follows: ``The Secretary, acting through the Administrator
of the Federal Highway Administration, in consultation with the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of
the Senate, shall appoint a Motorcyclist Advisory Council to coordinate
with and advise the Administrator on infrastructure issues of concern
to motorcyclists, including--
(1) Barrier design;
(2) Road design, construction, and maintenance practices; and
(3) The architecture and implementation of intelligent
transportation system technologies.''
In addition, section 1914 specifies the membership of the council:
``The Council shall consist of not more than 10 members of the
motorcycling community with professional expertise in national
motorcyclist safety advocacy, including--
(1) At least--
(A) One member recommended by a national motorcyclist association;
(B) One member recommended by a national motorcycle rider's
foundation;
(C) One representative of the National Association of State
Motorcycle Safety Administrators;
(D) Two members of State motorcyclists' organizations;
(E) One member recommended by a national organization that
represents the builders of highway infrastructure;
(F) One member recommended by a national association that
represents the traffic safety systems industry; and
(G) One member of a national safety organization; and
(2) At least one, and not more than two, motorcyclists who are
traffic system design engineers or State transportation department
officials.''
To carry out this requirement, the FHWA published a notice of
intent to form an advisory committee in the Federal Register on
December 23, 2005 (70 FR 76353). This notice, consistent with the
requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, announced the
establishment of the Council and invited comments and nominations for
membership. The MAC-FHWA was officially chartered for a 2-year period
on July 31, 2006, and was extended by act of the Secretary for an
additional 2-year term. That extension expires on July 31, 2010. The
FHWA announced the ten members selected to the Council in the Federal
Register on October 5, 2006 (71 FR 58903). An electronic copy of this
document and the previous Federal Register notices associated with the
MAC-FHWA can be downloaded through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at:
https://www.regulations.gov and the Office of the Federal Register's
home
[[Page 17830]]
page at: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register.
The FHWA anticipates that the MAC-FHWA will meet at least once a
year, with meetings held in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area and
the FHWA will publish notices in the Federal Register to announce the
times, dates, and locations of these meetings. Meetings of the Council
are open to the public and time will be provided in each meeting's
schedule for comments by members of the public. Attendance will
necessarily be limited by the size of the meeting room. Members of the
public may present oral or written comments at the meeting or may
present written materials by providing copies to Ms. Fran Bents,
Westat, 1650 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850-3195, (240) 314-
7557, ten (10) days prior to the meeting.
The agenda topics for the meetings will include a discussion of the
following issues: (1) Barrier design; (2) road design, construction,
and maintenance practices; and (3) the architecture and implementation
of intelligent transportation system technologies.
Conclusion
The eighth meeting of the Motorcyclist Advisory Council to the
Federal Highway Administration will be held on May 13, 2010, at the
Crystal City Marriott, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA
22202 from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m.
(Authority: Section 1914 of Pub. L. 109-59; Public L. 92-463, 5
U.S.C., App. II Sec. 1)
Issued on: March 29, 2010.
Victor M. Mendez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-7777 Filed 4-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P