Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; TOVIAZ, 17414-17415 [2010-7679]
Download as PDF
17414
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Collaborator fails to so notify
Institution, or elects not to obtain an
exclusive license, then Collaborator’s
option expires with respect to that
Section B Invention, and Institution will
be free to dispose of its interests in such
Section B Invention in accordance with
Institution’s policies. If Institution and
Collaborator fail to reach agreement
within ninety (90) days (or such
additional period as Collaborator and
Institution may agree) on the terms for
an exclusive license for a particular
Subject B Invention, then for a period of
six (6) months thereafter Institution
agrees not to offer to license the Section
B Invention to any third party on
materially better terms than those last
offered to Collaborator without first
offering such terms to Collaborator, in
which case Collaborator will have a
period of thirty (30) days in which to
accept or reject the offer. Institution
retains the right to make and use any
Section B Inventions for all non-profit
research, including for educational
purposes and to permit other
educational and non-profit institutions
to do so. If Collaborator elects to
negotiate an exclusive commercial
license to a Section B Invention, then
Institution agrees to file and prosecute
patent application(s) diligently and in a
timely manner and to give Collaborator
an opportunity to comment on the
preparation and filing of any such
patent application(s). Notwithstanding
the above, Institution is under no
obligation to file or maintain patent
prosecution for any Section B Invention.
Inventions arising more than five
years after the release of data on the
primary end point of the NCI CTEP
clinical trial that generated the clinical
data and/or specimens will not be
subject to the Section B (ii) IP Option.
C. The IP Option Described in This
Section C Would Apply to Inventions
Made by Institution’s Investigator(s) or
Any Other Employees or Agents of
Institution, Which Are or May Be
Patentable or Otherwise Protectable, as
a Result of Research Utilizing the
Agent(s) Outside the Scope of the NCI
CTEP Funding Agreement
(Unauthorized Inventions)
Institution agrees, at Collaborator’s
request and expense, to grant to
Collaborator a royalty-free exclusive or
co-exclusive license to Unauthorized
Inventions.
D. Institution Notification
Institution agrees to promptly notify
NCI CTEP (NCICTEPpubs@mail.nih.gov)
and Collaborator(s) in writing of any
Section A Inventions, Section B
Inventions, and Unauthorized
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Inventions upon the earlier of: (i) Any
submission of any invention disclosure
to Institution of a Section A, Section B,
or Unauthorized Invention, or (ii) the
filing of any patent applications of a
Section A, Section B, or Unauthorized
Invention. Institution agrees to provide
a copy of either the invention disclosure
or the patent application to the
Collaborator and to NCI CTEP which
will treat it in accordance with 37 CFR
part 401. These requirements do not
replace any applicable reporting
requirements under the Bayh-Dole Act,
35 U.S.C. 200–212, and implementing
regulations at 37 CFR part 401.
III. Request for Comments
NCI CTEP is seeking comment not
only from NCI CTEP funding recipients,
but from the full range of academic, notfor-profit, government, and private
sector participants in biomedical
research and development. Widespread
comment and participation by varied
stakeholders in the biomedical research
and development enterprise is critical if
this language is to be effective in
guiding the interactions of NIH funding
recipients with external Collaborators in
CTEP-funded studies.
Dated: March 30, 2010.
Jeffrey Abrams,
Associate Director, Cancer Therapy
Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer
Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–7743 Filed 4–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–E–0079]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; TOVIAZ
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
TOVIAZ and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product TOVIAZ
(fesoterodine fumarate). TOVIAZ is
indicated for treatment of overactive
bladder with symptoms of urge urinary
incontinence, urgency, and frequency.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for TOVIAZ
(U.S. Patent No. 6,858,650) from
Schwarz Pharma AG, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated September 29, 2009, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Notices
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of TOVIAZ
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
TOVIAZ is 2,395 days. Of this time,
1,445 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 950 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: April 13, 2002.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on April 13, 2002.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: March 27, 2006. The
applicant claims March 17, 2006, as the
date the new drug application (NDA) for
TOVIAZ (NDA 22–030) was initially
submitted. However, FDA records
indicate that NDA 22–030 was
submitted on March 27, 2006.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 31, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–030 was approved on October 31,
2008.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,155 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 7, 2010.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 4, 2010. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–7679 Filed 4–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–E–0400]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; FANAPT
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
FANAPT and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17415
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product FANAPT
(iloperidone). FANAPT is indicated for
the acute treatment of schizophrenia in
adults. Subsequent to this approval, the
Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for
FANAPT (U.S. Patent No. RE39,198)
from Aventis Holdings Inc., and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated September
2, 2009, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
FANAPT represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
FANAPT is 6,552 days. Of this time,
5,964 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 588 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: May 31, 1991.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on May 31, 1991.
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17414-17415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7679]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-E-0079]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; TOVIAZ
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for TOVIAZ and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product TOVIAZ
(fesoterodine fumarate). TOVIAZ is indicated for treatment of
overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary incontinence, urgency,
and frequency. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration application for TOVIAZ (U.S.
Patent No. 6,858,650) from Schwarz Pharma AG, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
September 29, 2009, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark
[[Page 17415]]
Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of TOVIAZ represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
TOVIAZ is 2,395 days. Of this time, 1,445 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 950 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
April 13, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date
the investigational new drug application became effective was on April
13, 2002.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: March 27, 2006.
The applicant claims March 17, 2006, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for TOVIAZ (NDA 22-030) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that NDA 22-030 was submitted on March
27, 2006.
3. The date the application was approved: October 31, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-030 was approved on October
31, 2008.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,155 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by June 7, 2010. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by October 4,
2010. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-7679 Filed 4-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S