Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI, 17106-17109 [2010-7689]
Download as PDF
17106
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
*
*
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Dated: February 26, 2010.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore, MD.
[FR Doc. 2010–7573 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0174]
RIN 1625–AA00
Submitting Comments
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit
River, Detroit, MI
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0174),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. A comment submitted
online via https://www.regulations.gov
will be considered received by the Coast
Guard when the comment is
successfully transmitted; a comment
submitted via fax, hand delivery, or
mail, will be considered as having been
received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0174’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and we may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from portions of the Detroit River during
the Red Bull Air Race. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with air races.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0174 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0174’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and the public from hazards associated
with an air race. The Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined air races in close
proximity to watercraft and
infrastructure pose a significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreational vessels, airplanes traveling
at high speeds and performing aerial
acrobatics, and large numbers of
spectators in close proximity on the
water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a
safety zone around the location of the
race’s course will help ensure the safety
of persons and property at these events
and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to
ensure safety of the public and vessels
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
during the setup, course familiarization,
time trials and race in conjunction with
the Red Bull Air Race. The safety zone
will be in effect from 9 a.m. June 3, 2010
through 6:30 p.m. June 6, 2010, to
accommodate for the air race and its
associated set-up and removal. During
that period, the safety zone will be
enforced daily from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.,
June 3rd through 6th, 2010. Specifically,
on June 5th and 6th, 2010, the river
closure will be enforced during any air
race activities. Vessels seeking to transit
the zone should contact the Captain of
the Port’s on-scene representative. The
on-scene representative may permit
vessels to transit the area when no air
race activity is occurring. On June 5,
2010, the river closure will total no
more than 5 hours between the hours of
9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. On June 6, 2010, the
river closure will total no more than 6
hours between the hours of 9 a.m. to
6:30 p.m. The Coast Guard expects to
have additional information from the
event organizer before publication of the
final rule and may adjust the hours of
enforcement for each day. The Coast
Guard also expects the temporary final
rule will be effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register
because delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest
due to the need to protect the public
from the dangers associated with air
racing.
The temporary safety zone will
encompass all navigable waters of the
United States on the Detroit River,
Detroit, MI, bound by a line extending
from a point on land southwest of Joe
Louis Arena at position 42°19.4′ N;
083°3.3′ W, northeast along the Detroit
shoreline to a point on land at position
42°20.0′ N; 083°1.2′ W, southeast to the
international border with Canada at
position 42°19.8′ N; 083°1.0′ W,
southwest along the international border
to position 42°19.2′N; 083°3.3′ W, and
northwest to the point of origin at
position 42°19.4′ N; 083°3.3′ W.
(DATUM: NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will cause
notice of enforcement of the safety zone
established by this section to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but is not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. Likewise,
the Windsor Port Authority intends to
restrict vessel movement on the
Canadian side of the Detroit River. The
exclusionary area on the Canadian side
will be aligned with the east and west
borders of the U.S. safety zone and will
extend to the shoreline along Windsor,
ON. The Captain of the Port will issue
a broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
the public when enforcement of the
safety zone is terminated.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this proposed rule restricts
access to the safety zone, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
(i) The safety zone will be in effect for
a limited duration; (ii) zone is an area
where the Coast Guard expects minimal
adverse impact to mariners from the
zone’s activation; and (iii) the Coast
Guard will make notifications via
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the portion of the Detroit River
discussed above between 9 a.m. and 6
p.m. on June 3, through June 6, 2010.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: this safety zone
will be subject to enforcement for a
short duration of approximately six
hours each day of its effective period.
Additionally, small entities such as
passenger vessels have been involved in
the planning stages of this event and
have had opportunities to make
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17107
alternate arrangements with regards to
mooring positions and business
operations during the hours this safety
zone will be in effect. Furthermore,
prior to the event local sailing and yacht
clubs will be provided with information
by Coast Guard Station Belle Isle on
what to expect during the event. Station
Bell Isle will do this in order to
minimize interruptions in the normal
business practices of local sailing and
yacht clubs. In the event that this
temporary safety zone affects shipping,
commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Detroit to transit through the safety
zone. The Coast Guard will give notice
to the public via a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect.
Additionally, the COTP will suspend
enforcement of the safety zone if the
event for which the zone is established
ends earlier than the expected time.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
17108
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
We invite your comments on how this
proposed rule might impact tribal
governments, even if that impact may
not constitute a ‘‘tribal implication’’
under the Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. Based on our
preliminary determination, there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction and neither an
environmental assessment nor a
environmental impact statement is
required.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0174 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T09–0174 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air
Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: all U.S. waters of
the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by
a line extending from a point on land
southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42°19.4′ N; 083°3.3′ W, northeast along
the Detroit shoreline to a point on land
at position 42°20.0′ N; 083°1.2′ W,
southeast to the international border
with Canada at position 42°19.8′ N
083°1.0′ W, southwest along the
international border to position 42°19.2′
N; 083°3.3′ W, and northwest to the
point of origin at position 42°19.4′ N;
083°3.3′ W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is
effective from 9 a.m. June 3, 2010
through 6:30 p.m. June 6, 2010. The
safety zone will be enforced daily from
9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 3, 2010
through June 6, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
designated on scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: March 19, 2010.
F.M. Midgette,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010–7689 Filed 4–1–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 36
[CC Docket No. 80–286; FCC 10–47]
Jurisdictional Separations and Referral
to the Federal-State Joint Board
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: Jurisdictional separations is
the process by which incumbent local
exchange carriers (incumbent LECs)
apportion regulated costs between the
intrastate and interstate jurisdictions. In
this document, the Commission seeks
comment on extending until June 30,
2011 the current freeze of part 36
category relationships and jurisdictional
cost allocation factors used in
jurisdictional separations, which freeze
would otherwise expire on June 30,
2010. Extending the freeze would allow
the Commission to provide stability for,
and avoid imposing undue burdens on,
carriers that must comply with the
Commission’s separations rules while
the Commission considers issues
relating to comprehensive reform of the
jurisdictional separations process.
DATES: Comments on extending the
freeze of part 36 category relationships
and jurisdictional cost allocation factors
are due on or before April 19, 2010.
Reply comments on extending the freeze
of part 36 category relationships and
jurisdictional cost allocation factors are
due on or before April 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 80–286, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov, and include
the following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Ball, Attorney Advisor, at 202–
418–1577, Pricing Policy Division,
Wireline Competition Bureau.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in CC
Docket No. 80–286, FCC 10–47, released
on March 29, 2010. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
Background
1. Jurisdictional separations is the
process by which incumbent LECs
apportion regulated costs between the
intrastate and interstate jurisdictions.
The NPRM proposes extending the
current freeze of part 36 category
relationships and jurisdictional cost
allocation factors used in jurisdictional
separations, which freeze would
otherwise expire on June 30, 2010, until
June 30, 2011. Extending the freeze will
allow the Commission to provide
stability for, and avoid imposing undue
burdens on, carriers that must comply
with the Commission’s separations rules
while the Commission considers issues
relating to comprehensive separations
reform.
2. The 2001 Separations Freeze Order,
66 FR 33202, June 21, 2001, froze all
part 36 category relationships and
allocation factors for price cap carriers
and all allocation factors for rate-ofreturn carriers. Rate-of-return carriers
had the option to freeze their category
relationships at the outset of the freeze.
The freeze was originally established
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17109
July 1, 2001 for a period of five years,
or until the Commission completed
separations reform, whichever occurred
first. The 2006 Separations Freeze
Extension Order, 71 FR 29843, May 24,
2006, extended the freeze for three years
or until the Commission completed
separations reform, whichever occurred
first, and the 2009 Separations Freeze
Extension Order, 74 FR 23955, May 22,
2009, extended the freeze until June 30,
2010.
3. In this NPRM the Commission
seeks comment on extending the freeze
for one year, until June 30, 2011. The
proposed extension would allow the
Commission to continue to work with
the Federal-State Joint Board on
Separations to achieve comprehensive
separations reform. Pending
comprehensive reform, the Commission
tentatively concludes that the existing
freeze should be extended on an interim
basis to avoid the imposition of undue
administrative burdens on incumbent
LECs. The Commission asks
commenters to consider how costly and
burdensome an extension of the freeze,
or a reversion to the pre-freeze part 36
rules, would be for small incumbent
LECs, and whether an extension would
disproportionately affect specific types
of carriers or ratepayers. Incumbent
LECs have not been required to utilize
the programs and expertise necessary to
prepare separations information since
the inception of the freeze almost nine
years ago. If the Commission does not
extend the separations freeze, and
instead allows the earlier separations
rules to return to force, incumbent LECs
would be required to reinstitute their
separations processes. Given the
imminent expiration of the current
separations freeze, it is unlikely that
incumbent LECs would have sufficient
time to reinstitute the separations
processes necessary to comply with the
earlier separations rules.
4. The extended freeze would be
implemented as described in the 2001
Separations Freeze Order. Specifically,
price-cap carriers would use the same
relationships between categories of
investment and expenses within part 32
accounts and the same jurisdictional
allocation factors that have been in
place since the inception of the current
freeze on July 1, 2001. Rate-of-return
carriers would use the same frozen
jurisdictional allocation factors, and
would use the same frozen category
relationships if they had opted
previously to freeze those as well.
Comment Filing Procedures
Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 64 (Monday, April 5, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17106-17109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7689]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0174]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan. This zone is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of the Detroit River during the Red Bull
Air Race. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect spectators
and vessels from the hazards associated with air races.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0174 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention Department, Sector
Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0174), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. A comment submitted
online via https://www.regulations.gov will be considered received by
the Coast Guard when the comment is successfully transmitted; a comment
submitted via fax, hand delivery, or mail, will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when the comment is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0174'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and we may
change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0174'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and the public from hazards associated with an air race. The
Captain of the Port Detroit has determined air races in close proximity
to watercraft and infrastructure pose a significant risk to public
safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers of
recreational vessels, airplanes traveling at high speeds and performing
aerial acrobatics, and large numbers of spectators in close proximity
on the water could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Establishing a safety zone around the location of the race's course
will help ensure the safety of persons and property at these events and
help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to ensure safety of the public and
vessels
[[Page 17107]]
during the setup, course familiarization, time trials and race in
conjunction with the Red Bull Air Race. The safety zone will be in
effect from 9 a.m. June 3, 2010 through 6:30 p.m. June 6, 2010, to
accommodate for the air race and its associated set-up and removal.
During that period, the safety zone will be enforced daily from 9 a.m.
to 6:30 p.m., June 3rd through 6th, 2010. Specifically, on June 5th and
6th, 2010, the river closure will be enforced during any air race
activities. Vessels seeking to transit the zone should contact the
Captain of the Port's on-scene representative. The on-scene
representative may permit vessels to transit the area when no air race
activity is occurring. On June 5, 2010, the river closure will total no
more than 5 hours between the hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. On June 6,
2010, the river closure will total no more than 6 hours between the
hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The Coast Guard expects to have additional
information from the event organizer before publication of the final
rule and may adjust the hours of enforcement for each day. The Coast
Guard also expects the temporary final rule will be effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the public interest due to the need
to protect the public from the dangers associated with air racing.
The temporary safety zone will encompass all navigable waters of
the United States on the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by a line
extending from a point on land southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, northeast along the Detroit shoreline
to a point on land at position 42[deg]20.0' N; 083[deg]1.2' W,
southeast to the international border with Canada at position
42[deg]19.8' N; 083[deg]1.0' W, southwest along the international
border to position 42[deg]19.2'N; 083[deg]3.3' W, and northwest to the
point of origin at position 42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W. (DATUM: NAD
83).
The Captain of the Port will cause notice of enforcement of the
safety zone established by this section to be made by all appropriate
means to the affected segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but is not limited to, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. Likewise, the Windsor Port
Authority intends to restrict vessel movement on the Canadian side of
the Detroit River. The exclusionary area on the Canadian side will be
aligned with the east and west borders of the U.S. safety zone and will
extend to the shoreline along Windsor, ON. The Captain of the Port will
issue a broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the public when
enforcement of the safety zone is terminated.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
Although this proposed rule restricts access to the safety zone,
the effect of this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety
zone will be in effect for a limited duration; (ii) zone is an area
where the Coast Guard expects minimal adverse impact to mariners from
the zone's activation; and (iii) the Coast Guard will make
notifications via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the portion of the Detroit River discussed above
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. on June 3, through June 6, 2010.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: this
safety zone will be subject to enforcement for a short duration of
approximately six hours each day of its effective period. Additionally,
small entities such as passenger vessels have been involved in the
planning stages of this event and have had opportunities to make
alternate arrangements with regards to mooring positions and business
operations during the hours this safety zone will be in effect.
Furthermore, prior to the event local sailing and yacht clubs will be
provided with information by Coast Guard Station Belle Isle on what to
expect during the event. Station Bell Isle will do this in order to
minimize interruptions in the normal business practices of local
sailing and yacht clubs. In the event that this temporary safety zone
affects shipping, commercial vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Detroit to transit through the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will give notice to the public via a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect. Additionally, the COTP will
suspend enforcement of the safety zone if the event for which the zone
is established ends earlier than the expected time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention
Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-
mail Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed
[[Page 17108]]
this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. We
invite your comments on how this proposed rule might impact tribal
governments, even if that impact may not constitute a ``tribal
implication'' under the Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a temporary safety zone. Based on
our preliminary determination, there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction and neither an
environmental assessment nor a environmental impact statement is
required.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0174 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0174 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River,
Detroit, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
U.S. waters of the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by a line
extending from a point on land southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, northeast along the Detroit shoreline
to a point on land at position 42[deg]20.0' N; 083[deg]1.2' W,
southeast to the international border with Canada at position
42[deg]19.8' N 083[deg]1.0' W, southwest along the international border
to position 42[deg]19.2' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, and northwest to the point
of origin at position 42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 9 a.m. June
3, 2010 through 6:30 p.m. June 6, 2010. The safety zone will be
enforced daily from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 3, 2010 through June 6,
2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his
[[Page 17109]]
designated on scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: March 19, 2010.
F.M. Midgette,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010-7689 Filed 4-1-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P