Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices; Designation of Special Controls for Certain Class II Devices and Exemption From Premarket Notification, 17093-17099 [2010-7637]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
delay due to heightened security
precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC
website, to the extent practicable, at
(https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of
discretion, the Commission makes every
effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act may be found in the FTC’s privacy
policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.shtm).
Section V. Communications by Outside
Parties to Commissioners or Their
Advisors
Written communications and
summaries of transcripts of oral
communications respecting the merits
of this proceeding from any outside
party to any Commissioner or
Commissioner’s advisor will be placed
on the public record.5
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 312
Children, Communications, Consumer
protection, Electronic mail, E-mail,
Internet, Online service, Privacy, Record
retention, Safety, Science and
technology, Trade practices, Website,
Youth.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6508.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–7549 Filed 4–2–10; 10:31 am]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6750–01–S
5 See
16 CFR Part 1.26(b)(5).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 882 and 890
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0493]
RIN 0910–ZA37
Neurological and Physical Medicine
Devices; Designation of Special
Controls for Certain Class II Devices
and Exemption From Premarket
Notification
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is proposing to
amend certain neurological device and
physical medicine device regulations to
establish special controls for these class
II devices and to exempt some of these
devices from the premarket notification
requirements of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act. Elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, FDA is
publishing a notice of availability of
draft guidance documents that would
serve as special controls for each of
these devices if the rule is finalized.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments by July 6, 2010. See section
III of this document for the proposed
effective date of a final rule based on
this proposed rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2009–N–
0493 and/or RIN number 0910–ZA37,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number and Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) (if a RIN number has been
assigned) for this rulemaking. All
comments will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. For additional information on
submitting comments, see the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17093
‘‘Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. DeLuca, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. G214, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, e-mail:
Robert.DeLuca@fda.hhs.gov, 301–796–
6630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Authority
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), as
amended by the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976 (the 1976
amendments) (Public Law 94–295), the
Safe Medical Device Amendments
(SMDA) (Public Law 101–629), and the
Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act (FDAMA) (Public
Law 105–115) established a
comprehensive system for the regulation
of medical devices intended for human
use. Section 513 of the act (21 U.S.C.
360c) established three categories
(classes) of devices, depending on the
regulatory controls needed to provide
reasonable assurance of their safety and
effectiveness. The three categories of
devices are class I (general controls),
class II (special controls), and class III
(premarket approval).
Most generic types of devices that
were on the market before the date of
the 1976 amendments (May 28, 1976)
(generally referred to as preamendments
devices) have been classified by FDA
under the procedures set forth in section
513(c) and (d) of the act through the
issuance of classification regulations
into one of these three regulatory
classes. Devices introduced into
interstate commerce for the first time on
or after May 28, 1976 (generally referred
to as postamendments devices) are
classified automatically by statute
(section 513(f) of the act) into class III
without any FDA rulemaking process.
These devices remain in class III and
require premarket approval, unless FDA
initiates the following procedures: (1)
FDA reclassifies the device into class I
or II; (2) FDA issues an order classifying
the device into class I or II in
accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
17094
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
act; or (3) FDA issues an order finding
the device to be substantially
equivalent, under section 513(i) of the
act, to a predicate device that is already
legally marketed. The agency
determines whether new devices are
substantially equivalent to predicate
devices through review of premarket
notifications under section 510(k) of the
act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)). Section 510(k) of
the act and the implementing
regulations, part 807 (21 CFR part 807),
require persons who intend to market a
new device to submit a premarket
notification report (510(k)) containing
information that allows FDA to
determine whether the new device is
‘‘substantially equivalent’’ within the
meaning of section 513(i) of the act to
a legally marketed device that does not
require premarket approval.
Section 510(m)(2) of the act provides
that FDA may exempt a device from the
premarket notification requirement on
its own initiative or upon petition of an
interested person, if FDA determines
that a 510(k) is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. This section
requires FDA to publish in the Federal
Register a notice of intent to exempt a
device, or of the petition, and to provide
a 30-day comment period. Within 120
days of publication of this document,
FDA must publish in the Federal
Register its final determination
regarding the exemption of the device
that was the subject of the notice.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. The Proposed Rule
A. Establishment of Special Controls
Under section 513(a)(1)(B) of the act,
as amended by SMDA, class II devices
are defined as devices for which general
controls by themselves are insufficient
to provide reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness, but for which
there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide
such assurance. Special controls may
include the promulgation of
performance standards, postmarket
surveillance, patient registries,
development and dissemination of
guidelines, recommendations, and other
appropriate actions the agency deems
necessary to provide such assurance (21
CFR 860.3(c)(2)).
Consistent with this authority, FDA is
proposing to amend the neurological
devices regulations to establish special
controls for electroconductive media
(§ 882.1275 (21 CFR 882.1275)) and the
cutaneous electrode (§ 882.1320 (21 CFR
882.1320)). FDA is also proposing to
amend the neurological devices
regulation at § 882.5890 (21 CFR
882.5890) to add paragraphs for the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief (§ 882.5890(a)),
the transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief intended for
over the counter use (§ 882.5890(b)), the
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief (§ 882.5890(c)), the percutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief
(§ 882.5890(d)), the transcutaneous
electrical stimulator for aesthetic
purposes (§ 882.5890(e)), and the
transcutaneous electrical stimulator
with limited output for aesthetic
purposes (§ 882.5890(f)).
Similarly, FDA is proposing to amend
the physical medicine devices
regulation at § 890.5850 (21 CFR
890.5850) to add paragraphs for the
powered muscle stimulator for
rehabilitation (§ 890.5850(a)), the
powered muscle stimulator with limited
output for rehabilitation (§ 890.5850(b)),
the powered muscle stimulator for
muscle conditioning (§ 890.5850(c)),
and the powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for muscle conditioning
(§ 890.5850(d)). FDA believes that
subdividing the classification
regulations for each of these device
types would provide clarity for persons
referencing the classification regulation.
FDA is also proposing to establish
special controls for each of these device
types. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, FDA is publishing a
notice of availability of the following
draft guidance documents that would
serve as special controls:
(1) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Electroconductive
Media;
(2) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Cutaneous
Electrode;
(3) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain
Relief;
(4) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain
Relief Intended for Over the Counter
Use;
(5) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator with
Limited Output for Pain Relief;
(6) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Stimulator for Aesthetic
Purposes;
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(7) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Stimulator with Limited
Output for Aesthetic Purposes;
(8) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator for Rehabilitation;
(9) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator with Limited Output for
Rehabilitation;
(10) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator for Muscle Conditioning; and
(11) Draft Guidance for Industry and
FDA Staff; Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator with Limited Output for
Muscle Conditioning.
The agency believes that the applicable
special controls and general controls
will provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness for each of the
foregoing device types.
B. Exemption From Premarket
Notification Requirements
Together with the establishment of
special controls, FDA, on its own
initiative, is also proposing to exempt
some of these device types from
premarket notification, subject to
limitations. FDA may consider a
number of factors in determining
whether premarket notification is
necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of a class II device. These factors are
discussed in the guidance the agency
issued on February 19, 1998, entitled
‘‘Procedures for Class II Device
Exemptions from Premarket
Notification, Guidance for Industry and
CDRH Staff.’’ The guidance can be
obtained electronically at https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Device
RegulationandGuidance/Guidance
Documents/ucm080198.htm.
FDA believes that the following class
II devices are appropriate for exemption
from premarket notification, subject to
the limitations of exemptions identified
in §§ 882.9 and 890.9 (21 CFR 882.9 and
890.9), because the applicable special
controls and general controls provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness if device manufacturers
follow the special controls guidances’
recommendations and, for the
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief and the powered muscle
stimulator with limited output for
rehabilitation, if the devices are also
restricted to sale, distribution, and use
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
in accordance with the prescription
device requirements in § 801.109 (21
CFR 801.109):
• Electroconductive media
(§ 882.1275);
• Cutaneous electrode (§ 882.1320);
• Transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief (§ 882.5890(c));
• Transcutaneous electrical
stimulator with limited output for
aesthetic purposes (§ 882.5890(e));
• Powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for rehabilitation
(§ 890.5850(b)); and
• Powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for muscle conditioning
(§ 890.5850(d)).
FDA is inviting comment on these
proposed exemptions.
FDA advises that exemption from the
requirement of premarket notification
does not mean that these devices would
be exempt from any other statutory or
regulatory requirements, unless such
exemption is explicitly provided by
order or regulation. Indeed, FDA’s
proposal to exempt these device types
from the requirement of premarket
notification is based, in part, on the
assurance of safety and effectiveness
that other regulatory controls, such as
current good manufacturing practice
requirements (21 CFR part 820),
provide.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Proposed Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule that
may issue based on this proposal
become effective 30 days after its date
of publication in the Federal Register. If
finalized, following the effective date of
a final rule, any firm intending to
market the applicable device types will
need to address the issues covered in
the respective special controls
guidances. Unless otherwise exempt,
the firm must show in its 510(k) that its
device meets the requirements of
§ 807.87 and complies with the special
controls.
As discussed previously in this
document, if the rule is finalized, for six
of the device types, manufacturers who
follow the specific measures
recommended to address the issues
identified in the special controls
guidances would be able to market their
devices without being subject to the
premarket notification requirements of
section 510(k) of the act, subject to the
limitations of §§ 882.9 and 890.9.
Manufacturers of two of these six device
types, transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief and powered muscle stimulator
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
with limited output for rehabilitation,
would also be restricted to sale,
distribution, and use in accordance with
the prescription device requirements in
§ 801.109 in order to be able to market
their devices without being subject to
premarket notification. Manufacturers
who choose alternative means to
address one or more of the issues
identified in the applicable special
controls guidance would remain subject
to the premarket notification
requirements of section 510(k) and
would need to obtain marketing
clearance for their device.
IV. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Classification of the devices
discussed in this proposed rule into
class II with special controls will
simplify the process of bringing these
devices to market. In addition,
exemption from the premarket
notification requirements for six of these
devices would reduce the costs
associated with bringing the devices to
market. Thus, the agency proposes to
certify that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17095
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $133
million, using the most current (2008)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The special controls required by this
proposed rule for the 11 listed devices
do not impose significant costs because
they do not add new regulatory
requirements. Instead, the special
controls clarify FDA expectations and
should shorten the time to market for
some new or modified devices.
Manufacturers of devices exempt from
the premarket notification requirements
would no longer have to wait until they
receive a substantial equivalence
determination from FDA before
marketing the device. For manufacturers
of devices that still require premarket
notification, the special controls clarify
FDA’s expectations making compliance
with the general and special controls
more straightforward and should
shorten the time to prepare a
submission and for FDA review.
Moreover, manufacturers of devices that
become exempt from the premarket
notification requirement would also
benefit from the elimination of
application preparation time and of
paper, copying, and mailing costs by not
having to prepare and submit 510(k)s.
These application savings are negligible,
however, relative to the total cost of
bringing a medical device to market.
The sector of the device industry
covered by the proposed rule is part of
the Electromedical and
Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
Manufacturing sector, NAICS code
334510. The Small Business
Administration classifies firms in this
sector as small if they have fewer than
500 employees. About 90 percent of
firms in this sector are small, employing
about 25 percent of the sector’s work
force. Table 1 lists the number of
manufacturers for the different types of
devices, an estimate of the number of
510(k)s submitted each year (based on
historical ranges), and our best estimate
of the percentage of new devices that
would be exempt from the premarket
notification requirement for each type of
device.
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
17096
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1.—NUMBER OF MANUFACTURERS AND 510(K)S PER YEAR
No. of Manufacturers1
Device Type
No. of 510(k)s per Year2
Percentage Exempt
Electroconductive media
21
0-5
>90%
Cutaneous electrode
76
5-15
>90%
110
15-25
60%
4
0-5
60%
Powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation
81
10-20
50%
Powered muscle stimulator for muscle conditioning
12
0-8
50%
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief
Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for aesthetic purposes
1 Manufacturers
2 Data
make multiple device types.
from 2000–2009.
The potential impact on small firms
would be to reduce the cost of entry by
shortening the time to market for those
firms who plan to market these devices.
It will impose no additional regulatory
burden on small entities, and it may
permit some small potential competitors
to enter the marketplace by lowering
their costs. Therefore the agency
proposes to certify that the final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VI. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. Section
4(a) of the Executive order requires
agencies to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal
statute to preempt State law only where
the statute contains an express
preemption provision or there is some
other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or
where the exercise of State law conflicts
with the exercise of Federal authority
under the Federal statute.’’ Federal law
includes an express preemption
provision that preempts certain state
requirements ‘‘different from or in
addition to’’ certain federal requirements
applicable to devices (21 U.S.C. 360k;
See Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470
(1996); Riegel v. Medtronic, 128 S. Ct.
999 (2008)). If this proposed rule is
made final, the special controls
established by the final rule would
create ‘‘requirements’’ for specific
medical devices under 21 U.S.C. 360k,
even though product sponsors have
some flexibility in how they meet those
requirements (Papike v. Tambrands,
Inc., 107 F.3d 737, 740–742 (9th Cir.
1997)).
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this
proposed rule contains no new
collection of information; however,
consistent with the regulatory impact
analysis in section V of this document,
we anticipate that the exemption of 6
devices types from the premarket
notification requirements of the act will
result in a reduction in burden to
existing collections of information
currently approved under OMB control
number 0910–0120.
Accordingly, with respect to the
collection of information discussed
below, FDA invites comments on these
topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
This proposed rule designates
guidance documents and other special
controls for certain neurological and
physical medicine devices and exempts
certain of these devices from premarket
notification requirements. FDA expects
an overall reduction in burden hours for
manufacturers of the six device types
that FDA is proposing to exempt from
the premarket notification reporting
requirements. The current burden
associated with submitting a premarket
notification submission under part 807,
subpart E is 79 hours per submission at
a cost of $100 per hour resulting in a
total cost of $7,900 per submission. As
identified elsewhere in this document,
the six device types being exempted
from the premarket notification
requirements of the act will no longer be
subject to this burden. Based on FDA’s
estimates of annual premarket
notifications submitted for the
exempted device types (table 2 of this
document), FDA estimates a total
burden reduction of 34.25 annual
premarket notification submissions
(90% of 2.5)+(90% of 10)+(60% of
20)+(60% of 2.5)+(50% of 15)+(50% of
4)), 2,706 hours (34.25 submissions x 79
hours), and $270,600 (2,706 hours x
$100 hourly rate).
TABLE 2.—AVERAGE NUMBER OF MANUFACTURERS AND PREMARKET NOTIFICATIONS (510(K)S) PER YEAR FOR PROPOSED
EXEMPT DEVICE TYPES
No. of Manufacturers1
No. of 510(k)s per Year2
Electroconductive media
21
2.5
Cutaneous electrode
76
10
> 90%
110
20
60%
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Device Type
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief
Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for aesthetic purposes
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
4
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
2.5
05APP1
Percentage Exempt
> 90%
60%
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
17097
TABLE 2.—AVERAGE NUMBER OF MANUFACTURERS AND PREMARKET NOTIFICATIONS (510(K)S) PER YEAR FOR PROPOSED
EXEMPT DEVICE TYPES—Continued
No. of Manufacturers1
Device Type
No. of 510(k)s per Year2
Percentage Exempt
Powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation
81
15
50%
Powered muscle stimulator for muscle conditioning
12
4
50%
1Manufacturers
make multiple device types.
2Data averaged from 2000–2009.
The guidance documents designated
as special controls for each of these 11
device types do not impose significant
costs because they do not add new
regulatory requirements. Instead, the
special controls clarify FDA
expectations and should shorten the
time to market for some new or
modified devices. For manufacturers of
devices that still require premarket
notification, the special controls clarify
FDA’s expectations making compliance
with the general and special controls
more straightforward and should
shorten the time to prepare a
submission and for FDA review. While
this clarification in expectations may
reduce the actual burden associated
with submitting a premarket notification
submission for these specific device
types, this reduction is negligible when
accounting for the size of entire
premarket notification program.
Accordingly, FDA will not be adjusting
the per submission burden estimate of
79 hours for premarket notification
submissions accounted for under OMB
control number 0910–0120.
VIII. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological
devices.
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Section 882.1275 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 882.1275
Electroconductive media.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Electroconductive
Media.’’ See § 882.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document.
The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations in § 882.9,
when it follows the recommendations of
the special controls guidance.
3. Section 882.1320 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 882.1320
Cutaneous electrode.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Cutaneous
Electrode.’’ See § 882.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document.
The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations in § 882.9,
when it follows the recommendations of
the special controls guidance.
4. Section 882.5890 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 882.5890 Transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulator for pain relief.
21 CFR Part 890
Medical devices, Physical medicine
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21 CFR parts 882 and 890 be amended
as follows:
(a) Transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief—(1)
Identification. A transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief
is an electrically powered device used
to apply an electrical current to
electrodes on a patient’s skin to relieve
pain. This does not include the device
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
types classified in paragraphs (b)
through (f) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain
Relief.’’ See § 882.1(e) for the availability
of this guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are
restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter.
(b) Transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief intended for
over-the-counter use—(1) Identification.
A transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief intended for
over-the-counter use is an electrically
powered device intended for over-thecounter use and used to apply an
electrical current to electrodes on a
patient’s skin to relieve pain. This does
not include the device types classified
in paragraphs (a) and (c) through (f) of
this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain
Relief Intended for Over the Counter
Use.’’ See § 882.1(e) for the availability
of this guidance document.
(c) Transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief—(1) Identification. A
transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain
relief is an electrically powered device
that is used to apply an electrical
current to electrodes on a patient’s skin
to relieve pain. This does not include
the device types classified in paragraphs
(a) through (b) and (d) through (f) of this
section. The device utilizes a stimulus
generator that delivers, into a resistive
load, which represents the worse case of
either 500 ohms or the typical load
expected during normal conditions of
use, the following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that
does not exceed Q, where Q = 20 +
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
17098
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is
the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50
percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that
does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary
(depolarizing) phase duration that does
not exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average direct current (dc) that
does not exceed 100 microamperes
when no pulses are being applied, or if
the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that
does not exceed 2 milliamperes root
mean square (rms) per square centimeter
of electrode conductive surface area;
and
(vi) A maximum average power
density that does not exceed 0.25 watts
per square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Nerve Stimulator with
Limited Output for Pain Relief.’’ See
§ 882.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are
restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter. The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations of exemptions
in § 882.9, when it follows the
recommendations of the special controls
guidance and its sale, distribution, and
use are restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter.
(d) Percutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator for pain relief—(1)
Identification. A percutaneous electrical
nerve stimulator for pain relief is an
electrically powered device used to
apply an electrical current to electrodes
that pass through a patient’s skin to
relieve pain. This does not include the
device types classified in paragraphs (a)
through (c) and (e) through (f) of this
section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is restriction of sale, distribution,
and use to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter.
(e) Transcutaneous electrical
stimulator for aesthetic purposes—(1)
Identification. A transcutaneous
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
electrical stimulator for aesthetic
purposes is an electrically powered
device applied externally to the body
surface using cutaneous electrodes to
deliver electrical current into the body,
and is intended to achieve aesthetic
effects through physical change to the
structure of the body. This does not
include the device types classified in
paragraphs (a) through (d) and (f) of this
section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Stimulator for Aesthetic
Purposes.’’ See § 882.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document.
(f) Transcutaneous electrical
stimulator with limited output for
aesthetic purposes—(1) Identification. A
transcutaneous electrical stimulator
with limited output for aesthetic
purposes is an electrically powered
device that is applied externally to the
body surface using cutaneous electrodes
to deliver electrical current into the
body, and is intended to achieve
aesthetic effects through physical
change to the structure of the body. This
does not include the device types
classified in paragraphs (a) through (e)
of this section. The device utilizes a
stimulus generator that delivers, into a
resistive load, which represents the
worse case of either 500 ohms or the
typical load expected during normal
conditions of use, the following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that
does not exceed Q, where Q = 20 +
(28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is
the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50
percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that
does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary
(depolarizing) phase duration that does
not exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average dc that does not
exceed 100 microamperes when no
pulses are being applied, or if the device
fails;
(v) A maximum current density that
does not exceed 2 milliamperes rms per
square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power
density that does not exceed 0.25 watts
per square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous
Electrical Stimulator with Limited
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Output for Aesthetic Purposes.’’ See
§ 882.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document. The device is
exempt from the premarket notification
procedures in subpart E of part 807 of
this chapter, subject to the limitations of
exemptions in § 882.9, when it follows
the recommendations of the special
controls guidance.
PART 890—PHYSICAL MEDICINE
DEVICES
5. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 890 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
6. Section 890.5850 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 890.5850
Powered muscle stimulator.
(a) Powered muscle stimulator for
rehabilitation—(1) Identification. A
powered muscle stimulator for
rehabilitation is an electrically powered
device intended for medical purposes
that repeatedly contracts muscles by
passing pulsed electrical current
through cutaneous electrodes contacting
the affected body area. This does not
include the powered muscle stimulators
classified in paragraphs (b) through (d)
of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator for Rehabilitation.’’ See
§ 890.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are
restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter.
(b) Powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for rehabilitation—(1)
Identification. A powered muscle
stimulator with limited output for
rehabilitation is an electrically powered
device that is intended for medical
purposes, and repeatedly contracts
muscles by passing pulsed electrical
current through cutaneous electrodes
contacting the affected body area. This
does not include the powered muscle
stimulators classified in paragraphs (a),
(c), and (d) of this section. The device
utilizes a stimulus generator that
delivers, into a resistive load, which
represents the worse case of either 500
ohms or the typical load expected
during normal conditions of use, the
following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that
does not exceed Q, where Q = 20 +
(28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50
percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that
does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary
(depolarizing) phase duration that does
not exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average direct current (dc) that
does not exceed 100 microamperes
when no pulses are being applied, or if
the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that
does not exceed 2 milliamperes root
mean square (rms) per square centimeter
of electrode conductive surface area;
and
(vi) A maximum average power
density that does not exceed 0.25 watts
per square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator with Limited Output for
Rehabilitation.’’ See § 890.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document;
and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are
restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter. The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations of exemptions
in § 890.9, when it follows the
recommendations of the special controls
guidance and its sale, distribution, and
use are restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device
requirements in § 801.109 of this
chapter.
(c) Powered muscle stimulator for
muscle conditioning—(1) Identification.
A powered muscle stimulator for
muscle conditioning is an electrically
powered device that repeatedly
contracts muscles by passing pulsed
electrical current through cutaneous
electrodes and into the body, thereby
temporarily affecting the stimulated
muscles’ contractile properties, force
output, and/or fatigue resistance. This
does not include the powered muscle
stimulators classified in paragraphs (a),
(b), and (d) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls.) The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator for Muscle Conditioning.’’
See § 890.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:13 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
(d) Powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for muscle
conditioning—(1) Identification. A
powered muscle stimulator with limited
output for muscle conditioning is an
electrically powered device that
repeatedly contracts muscles by passing
pulsed electrical current through
cutaneous electrodes and into the body,
thereby temporarily affecting the
stimulated muscles’ contractile
properties, force output, and/or fatigue
resistance. This does not include the
powered muscle stimulators classified
in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
section. The device utilizes a stimulus
generator that delivers, into a resistive
load, which represents the worse case of
either 500 ohms or the typical load
expected during normal conditions of
use, the following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that
does not exceed Q, where Q = 20 +
(28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is
the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50
percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that
does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary
(depolarizing) phase duration that does
not exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average dc that does not
exceed 100 microamperes when no
pulses are being applied, or if the device
fails;
(v) A maximum current density that
does not exceed 2 milliamperes rms per
square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power
density that does not exceed 0.25 watts
per square centimeter of electrode
conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control for this
device is the FDA guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle
Stimulator with Limited Output for
Muscle Conditioning.’’ See § 890.1(e) for
the availability of this guidance
document. The device is exempt from
the premarket notification procedures in
subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations of exemptions
in § 890.9, when it follows the
recommendations of the special controls
guidance.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Director, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–7637 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17099
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0180]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Event; Temporary Change of Dates for
Recurring Marine Event in Fifth Coast
Guard District
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the enforcement
period of special local regulations for
recurring marine events in Fifth Coast
Guard District. The regulation applies to
one recurring marine event that
establishes two spectator vessel
anchorage areas and restricts vessel
traffic. Special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the Hampton River,
Hampton, VA, and Sunset Creek,
Hampton, VA during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0180 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy,
Project Manager, Sector Hampton
Roads, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 757–
668–5580, e-mail
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 64 (Monday, April 5, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17093-17099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7637]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 882 and 890
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0493]
RIN 0910-ZA37
Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices; Designation of
Special Controls for Certain Class II Devices and Exemption From
Premarket Notification
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend
certain neurological device and physical medicine device regulations to
establish special controls for these class II devices and to exempt
some of these devices from the premarket notification requirements of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, FDA is publishing a notice of availability of
draft guidance documents that would serve as special controls for each
of these devices if the rule is finalized.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by July 6, 2010. See
section III of this document for the proposed effective date of a final
rule based on this proposed rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2009-
N-0493 and/or RIN number 0910-ZA37, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) (if a RIN number
has been assigned) for this rulemaking. All comments will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. For additional information on submitting
comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. DeLuca, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. G214, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, e-
mail: Robert.DeLuca@fda.hhs.gov, 301-796-6630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Authority
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 301
et seq.), as amended by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the 1976
amendments) (Public Law 94-295), the Safe Medical Device Amendments
(SMDA) (Public Law 101-629), and the Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act (FDAMA) (Public Law 105-115) established a
comprehensive system for the regulation of medical devices intended for
human use. Section 513 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360c) established three
categories (classes) of devices, depending on the regulatory controls
needed to provide reasonable assurance of their safety and
effectiveness. The three categories of devices are class I (general
controls), class II (special controls), and class III (premarket
approval).
Most generic types of devices that were on the market before the
date of the 1976 amendments (May 28, 1976) (generally referred to as
preamendments devices) have been classified by FDA under the procedures
set forth in section 513(c) and (d) of the act through the issuance of
classification regulations into one of these three regulatory classes.
Devices introduced into interstate commerce for the first time on or
after May 28, 1976 (generally referred to as postamendments devices)
are classified automatically by statute (section 513(f) of the act)
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval, unless FDA initiates the
following procedures: (1) FDA reclassifies the device into class I or
II; (2) FDA issues an order classifying the device into class I or II
in accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the
[[Page 17094]]
act; or (3) FDA issues an order finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, under section 513(i) of the act, to a predicate device that
is already legally marketed. The agency determines whether new devices
are substantially equivalent to predicate devices through review of
premarket notifications under section 510(k) of the act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)). Section 510(k) of the act and the implementing regulations,
part 807 (21 CFR part 807), require persons who intend to market a new
device to submit a premarket notification report (510(k)) containing
information that allows FDA to determine whether the new device is
``substantially equivalent'' within the meaning of section 513(i) of
the act to a legally marketed device that does not require premarket
approval.
Section 510(m)(2) of the act provides that FDA may exempt a device
from the premarket notification requirement on its own initiative or
upon petition of an interested person, if FDA determines that a 510(k)
is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. This section requires FDA to publish in
the Federal Register a notice of intent to exempt a device, or of the
petition, and to provide a 30-day comment period. Within 120 days of
publication of this document, FDA must publish in the Federal Register
its final determination regarding the exemption of the device that was
the subject of the notice.
II. The Proposed Rule
A. Establishment of Special Controls
Under section 513(a)(1)(B) of the act, as amended by SMDA, class II
devices are defined as devices for which general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but for which there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide such assurance. Special controls
may include the promulgation of performance standards, postmarket
surveillance, patient registries, development and dissemination of
guidelines, recommendations, and other appropriate actions the agency
deems necessary to provide such assurance (21 CFR 860.3(c)(2)).
Consistent with this authority, FDA is proposing to amend the
neurological devices regulations to establish special controls for
electroconductive media (Sec. 882.1275 (21 CFR 882.1275)) and the
cutaneous electrode (Sec. 882.1320 (21 CFR 882.1320)). FDA is also
proposing to amend the neurological devices regulation at Sec.
882.5890 (21 CFR 882.5890) to add paragraphs for the transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief (Sec. 882.5890(a)), the
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief intended for
over the counter use (Sec. 882.5890(b)), the transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulator with limited output for pain relief (Sec.
882.5890(c)), the percutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain
relief (Sec. 882.5890(d)), the transcutaneous electrical stimulator
for aesthetic purposes (Sec. 882.5890(e)), and the transcutaneous
electrical stimulator with limited output for aesthetic purposes (Sec.
882.5890(f)).
Similarly, FDA is proposing to amend the physical medicine devices
regulation at Sec. 890.5850 (21 CFR 890.5850) to add paragraphs for
the powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation (Sec. 890.5850(a)),
the powered muscle stimulator with limited output for rehabilitation
(Sec. 890.5850(b)), the powered muscle stimulator for muscle
conditioning (Sec. 890.5850(c)), and the powered muscle stimulator
with limited output for muscle conditioning (Sec. 890.5850(d)). FDA
believes that subdividing the classification regulations for each of
these device types would provide clarity for persons referencing the
classification regulation.
FDA is also proposing to establish special controls for each of
these device types. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register,
FDA is publishing a notice of availability of the following draft
guidance documents that would serve as special controls:
(1) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Electroconductive Media;
(2) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Cutaneous Electrode;
(3) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator
for Pain Relief;
(4) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator
for Pain Relief Intended for Over the Counter Use;
(5) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator
with Limited Output for Pain Relief;
(6) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulator for
Aesthetic Purposes;
(7) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulator with
Limited Output for Aesthetic Purposes;
(8) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator for
Rehabilitation;
(9) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator with Limited
Output for Rehabilitation;
(10) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator for Muscle
Conditioning; and
(11) Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; Class II Special
Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator with Limited
Output for Muscle Conditioning.
The agency believes that the applicable special controls and general
controls will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness for each of the foregoing device types.
B. Exemption From Premarket Notification Requirements
Together with the establishment of special controls, FDA, on its
own initiative, is also proposing to exempt some of these device types
from premarket notification, subject to limitations. FDA may consider a
number of factors in determining whether premarket notification is
necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of a class II device. These factors are discussed in the
guidance the agency issued on February 19, 1998, entitled ``Procedures
for Class II Device Exemptions from Premarket Notification, Guidance
for Industry and CDRH Staff.'' The guidance can be obtained
electronically at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080198.htm.
FDA believes that the following class II devices are appropriate
for exemption from premarket notification, subject to the limitations
of exemptions identified in Sec. Sec. 882.9 and 890.9 (21 CFR 882.9
and 890.9), because the applicable special controls and general
controls provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness if
device manufacturers follow the special controls guidances'
recommendations and, for the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator
with limited output for pain relief and the powered muscle stimulator
with limited output for rehabilitation, if the devices are also
restricted to sale, distribution, and use
[[Page 17095]]
in accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec.
801.109 (21 CFR 801.109):
Electroconductive media (Sec. 882.1275);
Cutaneous electrode (Sec. 882.1320);
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator with limited
output for pain relief (Sec. 882.5890(c));
Transcutaneous electrical stimulator with limited output
for aesthetic purposes (Sec. 882.5890(e));
Powered muscle stimulator with limited output for
rehabilitation (Sec. 890.5850(b)); and
Powered muscle stimulator with limited output for muscle
conditioning (Sec. 890.5850(d)).
FDA is inviting comment on these proposed exemptions.
FDA advises that exemption from the requirement of premarket
notification does not mean that these devices would be exempt from any
other statutory or regulatory requirements, unless such exemption is
explicitly provided by order or regulation. Indeed, FDA's proposal to
exempt these device types from the requirement of premarket
notification is based, in part, on the assurance of safety and
effectiveness that other regulatory controls, such as current good
manufacturing practice requirements (21 CFR part 820), provide.
III. Proposed Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule that may issue based on this
proposal become effective 30 days after its date of publication in the
Federal Register. If finalized, following the effective date of a final
rule, any firm intending to market the applicable device types will
need to address the issues covered in the respective special controls
guidances. Unless otherwise exempt, the firm must show in its 510(k)
that its device meets the requirements of Sec. 807.87 and complies
with the special controls.
As discussed previously in this document, if the rule is finalized,
for six of the device types, manufacturers who follow the specific
measures recommended to address the issues identified in the special
controls guidances would be able to market their devices without being
subject to the premarket notification requirements of section 510(k) of
the act, subject to the limitations of Sec. Sec. 882.9 and 890.9.
Manufacturers of two of these six device types, transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator with limited output for pain relief and
powered muscle stimulator with limited output for rehabilitation, would
also be restricted to sale, distribution, and use in accordance with
the prescription device requirements in Sec. 801.109 in order to be
able to market their devices without being subject to premarket
notification. Manufacturers who choose alternative means to address one
or more of the issues identified in the applicable special controls
guidance would remain subject to the premarket notification
requirements of section 510(k) and would need to obtain marketing
clearance for their device.
IV. Environmental Impact
The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Classification of the devices discussed in this
proposed rule into class II with special controls will simplify the
process of bringing these devices to market. In addition, exemption
from the premarket notification requirements for six of these devices
would reduce the costs associated with bringing the devices to market.
Thus, the agency proposes to certify that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $133 million, using the most current (2008) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The special controls required by this proposed rule for the 11
listed devices do not impose significant costs because they do not add
new regulatory requirements. Instead, the special controls clarify FDA
expectations and should shorten the time to market for some new or
modified devices. Manufacturers of devices exempt from the premarket
notification requirements would no longer have to wait until they
receive a substantial equivalence determination from FDA before
marketing the device. For manufacturers of devices that still require
premarket notification, the special controls clarify FDA's expectations
making compliance with the general and special controls more
straightforward and should shorten the time to prepare a submission and
for FDA review. Moreover, manufacturers of devices that become exempt
from the premarket notification requirement would also benefit from the
elimination of application preparation time and of paper, copying, and
mailing costs by not having to prepare and submit 510(k)s. These
application savings are negligible, however, relative to the total cost
of bringing a medical device to market.
The sector of the device industry covered by the proposed rule is
part of the Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
Manufacturing sector, NAICS code 334510. The Small Business
Administration classifies firms in this sector as small if they have
fewer than 500 employees. About 90 percent of firms in this sector are
small, employing about 25 percent of the sector's work force. Table 1
lists the number of manufacturers for the different types of devices,
an estimate of the number of 510(k)s submitted each year (based on
historical ranges), and our best estimate of the percentage of new
devices that would be exempt from the premarket notification
requirement for each type of device.
[[Page 17096]]
Table 1.--Number of Manufacturers and 510(k)s per Year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of No. of 510(k)s per
Device Type Manufacturers\1\ Year\2\ Percentage Exempt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electroconductive media 21 0-5 >90%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cutaneous electrode 76 5-15 >90%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator 110 15-25 60%
for pain relief
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for 4 0-5 60%
aesthetic purposes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered muscle stimulator for 81 10-20 50%
rehabilitation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered muscle stimulator for muscle 12 0-8 50%
conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Manufacturers make multiple device types.
\2\ Data from 2000-2009.
The potential impact on small firms would be to reduce the cost of
entry by shortening the time to market for those firms who plan to
market these devices. It will impose no additional regulatory burden on
small entities, and it may permit some small potential competitors to
enter the marketplace by lowering their costs. Therefore the agency
proposes to certify that the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
VI. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the
Executive order requires agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute
to preempt State law only where the statute contains an express
preemption provision or there is some other clear evidence that the
Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of
State law conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the
Federal statute.'' Federal law includes an express preemption provision
that preempts certain state requirements ``different from or in
addition to'' certain federal requirements applicable to devices (21
U.S.C. 360k; See Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996); Riegel v.
Medtronic, 128 S. Ct. 999 (2008)). If this proposed rule is made final,
the special controls established by the final rule would create
``requirements'' for specific medical devices under 21 U.S.C. 360k,
even though product sponsors have some flexibility in how they meet
those requirements (Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107 F.3d 737, 740-742
(9th Cir. 1997)).
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
FDA tentatively concludes that this proposed rule contains no new
collection of information; however, consistent with the regulatory
impact analysis in section V of this document, we anticipate that the
exemption of 6 devices types from the premarket notification
requirements of the act will result in a reduction in burden to
existing collections of information currently approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120.
Accordingly, with respect to the collection of information
discussed below, FDA invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.
This proposed rule designates guidance documents and other special
controls for certain neurological and physical medicine devices and
exempts certain of these devices from premarket notification
requirements. FDA expects an overall reduction in burden hours for
manufacturers of the six device types that FDA is proposing to exempt
from the premarket notification reporting requirements. The current
burden associated with submitting a premarket notification submission
under part 807, subpart E is 79 hours per submission at a cost of $100
per hour resulting in a total cost of $7,900 per submission. As
identified elsewhere in this document, the six device types being
exempted from the premarket notification requirements of the act will
no longer be subject to this burden. Based on FDA's estimates of annual
premarket notifications submitted for the exempted device types (table
2 of this document), FDA estimates a total burden reduction of 34.25
annual premarket notification submissions (90% of 2.5)+(90% of 10)+(60%
of 20)+(60% of 2.5)+(50% of 15)+(50% of 4)), 2,706 hours (34.25
submissions x 79 hours), and $270,600 (2,706 hours x $100 hourly rate).
Table 2.--Average Number of Manufacturers and Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) per Year for Proposed Exempt
Device Types
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of No. of 510(k)s per
Device Type Manufacturers\1\ Year\2\ Percentage Exempt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electroconductive media 21 2.5 > 90%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cutaneous electrode 76 10 > 90%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator 110 20 60%
for pain relief
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for 4 2.5 60%
aesthetic purposes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17097]]
Powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation 81 15 50%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered muscle stimulator for muscle 12 4 50%
conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Manufacturers make multiple device types.
\2\Data averaged from 2000-2009.
The guidance documents designated as special controls for each of
these 11 device types do not impose significant costs because they do
not add new regulatory requirements. Instead, the special controls
clarify FDA expectations and should shorten the time to market for some
new or modified devices. For manufacturers of devices that still
require premarket notification, the special controls clarify FDA's
expectations making compliance with the general and special controls
more straightforward and should shorten the time to prepare a
submission and for FDA review. While this clarification in expectations
may reduce the actual burden associated with submitting a premarket
notification submission for these specific device types, this reduction
is negligible when accounting for the size of entire premarket
notification program. Accordingly, FDA will not be adjusting the per
submission burden estimate of 79 hours for premarket notification
submissions accounted for under OMB control number 0910-0120.
VIII. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments
are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological devices.
21 CFR Part 890
Medical devices, Physical medicine devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is
proposed that 21 CFR parts 882 and 890 be amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 882 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
2. Section 882.1275 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 882.1275 Electroconductive media.
* * * * *
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Electroconductive Media.'' See
Sec. 882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document. The
device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart
E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in Sec.
882.9, when it follows the recommendations of the special controls
guidance.
3. Section 882.1320 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 882.1320 Cutaneous electrode.
* * * * *
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Cutaneous Electrode.'' See Sec.
882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document. The device is
exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part
807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in Sec. 882.9, when it
follows the recommendations of the special controls guidance.
4. Section 882.5890 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5890 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain
relief.
(a) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief--(1)
Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain
relief is an electrically powered device used to apply an electrical
current to electrodes on a patient's skin to relieve pain. This does
not include the device types classified in paragraphs (b) through (f)
of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator for Pain
Relief.'' See Sec. 882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance
document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use
in accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec.
801.109 of this chapter.
(b) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief
intended for over-the-counter use--(1) Identification. A transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief intended for over-the-
counter use is an electrically powered device intended for over-the-
counter use and used to apply an electrical current to electrodes on a
patient's skin to relieve pain. This does not include the device types
classified in paragraphs (a) and (c) through (f) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve
Stimulator for Pain Relief Intended for Over the Counter Use.'' See
Sec. 882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
(c) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator with limited output
for pain relief--(1) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulator with limited output for pain relief is an electrically
powered device that is used to apply an electrical current to
electrodes on a patient's skin to relieve pain. This does not include
the device types classified in paragraphs (a) through (b) and (d)
through (f) of this section. The device utilizes a stimulus generator
that delivers, into a resistive load, which represents the worse case
of either 500 ohms or the typical load expected during normal
conditions of use, the following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that does not exceed Q, where Q = 20
+
[[Page 17098]]
(28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50 percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary (depolarizing) phase duration that does not
exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average direct current (dc) that does not exceed 100
microamperes when no pulses are being applied, or if the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that does not exceed 2 milliamperes
root mean square (rms) per square centimeter of electrode conductive
surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power density that does not exceed 0.25
watts per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator with
Limited Output for Pain Relief.'' See Sec. 882.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use
in accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec.
801.109 of this chapter. The device is exempt from the premarket
notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations of exemptions in Sec. 882.9, when it
follows the recommendations of the special controls guidance and its
sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec. 801.109
of this chapter.
(d) Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief--(1)
Identification. A percutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain
relief is an electrically powered device used to apply an electrical
current to electrodes that pass through a patient's skin to relieve
pain. This does not include the device types classified in paragraphs
(a) through (c) and (e) through (f) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is restriction of sale, distribution, and use
to prescription use in accordance with the prescription device
requirements in Sec. 801.109 of this chapter.
(e) Transcutaneous electrical stimulator for aesthetic purposes--
(1) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical stimulator for
aesthetic purposes is an electrically powered device applied externally
to the body surface using cutaneous electrodes to deliver electrical
current into the body, and is intended to achieve aesthetic effects
through physical change to the structure of the body. This does not
include the device types classified in paragraphs (a) through (d) and
(f) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical
Stimulator for Aesthetic Purposes.'' See Sec. 882.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document.
(f) Transcutaneous electrical stimulator with limited output for
aesthetic purposes--(1) Identification. A transcutaneous electrical
stimulator with limited output for aesthetic purposes is an
electrically powered device that is applied externally to the body
surface using cutaneous electrodes to deliver electrical current into
the body, and is intended to achieve aesthetic effects through physical
change to the structure of the body. This does not include the device
types classified in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section. The
device utilizes a stimulus generator that delivers, into a resistive
load, which represents the worse case of either 500 ohms or the typical
load expected during normal conditions of use, the following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that does not exceed Q, where Q = 20
+ (28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50 percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary (depolarizing) phase duration that does not
exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average dc that does not exceed 100 microamperes when no
pulses are being applied, or if the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that does not exceed 2 milliamperes
rms per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power density that does not exceed 0.25
watts per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Transcutaneous Electrical
Stimulator with Limited Output for Aesthetic Purposes.'' See Sec.
882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document. The device is
exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part
807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations of exemptions in Sec.
882.9, when it follows the recommendations of the special controls
guidance.
PART 890--PHYSICAL MEDICINE DEVICES
5. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 890 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
6. Section 890.5850 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 890.5850 Powered muscle stimulator.
(a) Powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation--(1)
Identification. A powered muscle stimulator for rehabilitation is an
electrically powered device intended for medical purposes that
repeatedly contracts muscles by passing pulsed electrical current
through cutaneous electrodes contacting the affected body area. This
does not include the powered muscle stimulators classified in
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator for Rehabilitation.'' See
Sec. 890.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use
in accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec.
801.109 of this chapter.
(b) Powered muscle stimulator with limited output for
rehabilitation--(1) Identification. A powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for rehabilitation is an electrically powered device
that is intended for medical purposes, and repeatedly contracts muscles
by passing pulsed electrical current through cutaneous electrodes
contacting the affected body area. This does not include the powered
muscle stimulators classified in paragraphs (a), (c), and (d) of this
section. The device utilizes a stimulus generator that delivers, into a
resistive load, which represents the worse case of either 500 ohms or
the typical load expected during normal conditions of use, the
following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that does not exceed Q, where Q = 20
+ (28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is
[[Page 17099]]
the phase duration expressed in milliseconds and measured at 50 percent
of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary (depolarizing) phase duration that does not
exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average direct current (dc) that does not exceed 100
microamperes when no pulses are being applied, or if the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that does not exceed 2 milliamperes
root mean square (rms) per square centimeter of electrode conductive
surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power density that does not exceed 0.25
watts per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(i) The FDA guidance document entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator with Limited Output for
Rehabilitation.'' See Sec. 890.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document; and
(ii) Sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use
in accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec.
801.109 of this chapter. The device is exempt from the premarket
notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter,
subject to the limitations of exemptions in Sec. 890.9, when it
follows the recommendations of the special controls guidance and its
sale, distribution, and use are restricted to prescription use in
accordance with the prescription device requirements in Sec. 801.109
of this chapter.
(c) Powered muscle stimulator for muscle conditioning--(1)
Identification. A powered muscle stimulator for muscle conditioning is
an electrically powered device that repeatedly contracts muscles by
passing pulsed electrical current through cutaneous electrodes and into
the body, thereby temporarily affecting the stimulated muscles'
contractile properties, force output, and/or fatigue resistance. This
does not include the powered muscle stimulators classified in
paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of this section.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls.) The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator for
Muscle Conditioning.'' See Sec. 890.1(e) for the availability of this
guidance document.
(d) Powered muscle stimulator with limited output for muscle
conditioning--(1) Identification. A powered muscle stimulator with
limited output for muscle conditioning is an electrically powered
device that repeatedly contracts muscles by passing pulsed electrical
current through cutaneous electrodes and into the body, thereby
temporarily affecting the stimulated muscles' contractile properties,
force output, and/or fatigue resistance. This does not include the
powered muscle stimulators classified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of
this section. The device utilizes a stimulus generator that delivers,
into a resistive load, which represents the worse case of either 500
ohms or the typical load expected during normal conditions of use, the
following:
(i) A maximum charge per phase that does not exceed Q, where Q = 20
+ (28)(t) microcoulombs (and where t is the phase duration expressed in
milliseconds and measured at 50 percent of the phase amplitude);
(ii) A maximum average current that does not exceed 10 milliamperes
(average absolute value);
(iii) A maximum primary (depolarizing) phase duration that does not
exceed 500 microseconds;
(iv) An average dc that does not exceed 100 microamperes when no
pulses are being applied, or if the device fails;
(v) A maximum current density that does not exceed 2 milliamperes
rms per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area; and
(vi) A maximum average power density that does not exceed 0.25
watts per square centimeter of electrode conductive surface area.
(2) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled ``Class
II Special Controls Guidance Document: Powered Muscle Stimulator with
Limited Output for Muscle Conditioning.'' See Sec. 890.1(e) for the
availability of this guidance document. The device is exempt from the
premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this
chapter, subject to the limitations of exemptions in Sec. 890.9, when
it follows the recommendations of the special controls guidance.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-7637 Filed 4-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S