Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections: Extension of Compliance Date for Posting of Flight Delay Data on Web Sites, 17050-17052 [2010-7627]
Download as PDF
17050
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
community change it may be necessary
for the FAA to again revise its policy.
The FAA special-issuance policy will
include consideration for depression
treated with certain antidepressant
medication under the guidance set forth
as follows:
CONSIDERATION FOR SPECIAL ISSUANCE OF A MEDICAL CERTIFICATE WITH REGARD TO DEPRESSION TREATED WITH
MEDICATION
This protocol applies to considerations for special-issuance medical certification for airmen requesting first-, second-, and third-class specialissuance medical certificates, for the exercise of privilege under 14 CFR parts 121, 135, or 91, who are being treated with certain
antidepressant medications.
Criteria To Be Considered
Required Reports and Consultations
(Initial Consideration)
Diagnoses
Mild to moderate depressive disorders, such as:
1. Major Depressive Disorder (mild to moderate) either single episode or recurrent episode
2. Dysthymic Disorder
3. Adjustment disorder with depressed mood
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Pharmacologic Agents Considered
(Single-Agent Use Only)
Fluoxetine (Prozac);
Sertraline (Zoloft);
Citalopram (Celexa); or
Escitalopram (Lexapro)
Specifically Unacceptable Diagnoses and or Symptoms
Psychosis
Suicidal ideation
History of electro convulsive therapy (ECT)
Treatment with multiple antidepressant medications concurrently
History of multi-agent drug protocol use (prior use of other psychiatric drugs in conjunction with antidepressant medications)
1. A consultation status report (and follow-up reports as required) from
a treating psychiatrist attesting to and describing the applicant’s diagnosis, length and course of treatment, dosage of the antidepressant
medication taken, and presence of any side effects from the
antidepressant the applicant takes or has taken in the past;
2. A written statement prepared by the applicant describing his or her
history of antidepressant usage and mental health status;
3. A report of the results of neurocognitive psychological tests with provision of the raw test data, including, but not limited to:
COGSCREEN AE, Trails A/B; Stroop Test; CCPT, PASSAT, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test;
4. An evaluation and a written report from a HIMS-trained AME who
has reviewed items 1., 2., and 3. above and who makes a recommendation for a special-issuance medical certificate; and
5. Any additional information the Federal Air Surgeon may require to
make a determination.
Psychiatric Status
1. All symptoms of the psychiatric condition for which treatment is indicated must be ameliorated by the single medication and the condition must be stable with no change in or exacerbation of symptoms
for 12 months prior to certification;
2. Airman must be on a stable dosage of medication for a minimum of
12 months prior to certification; and
3. Airman must have no aeromedically significant side effects of prescribed medication.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 26,
2010.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
ACTION: Final rule; extension of
compliance date.
[FR Doc. 2010–7527 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Part 234
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2010–0039]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
RIN No. 2105–AE00
Enhancing Airline Passenger
Protections: Extension of Compliance
Date for Posting of Flight Delay Data
on Web Sites
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: The Department of
Transportation is extending by 60 days,
i.e., until June 29, 2010, the compliance
date of the provision in its final rule
entitled ‘‘Enhancing Airline Passenger
Protections’’ that requires airlines to
publish flight delay information on their
Web sites. This extension is in response
to requests by several carrier
associations for an additional 90 days
time for airlines to comply with the
requirement to display flight delay data
on Web sites in view of the extensive
changes to carriers’ reporting systems
that are necessitated by the rule and
their contention that completion of
these tasks is not possible by April 29,
2010, the current effective date of the
requirement. The Department agrees
that additional time to comply with the
posting of flight delay information on
the carriers’ Web sites is warranted to
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ensure the posting of complete and
accurate information but has
determined that 60 days is enough time
for the carriers to do so. Therefore, this
final rule extends the compliance date
for the provision in question for an
additional 60 days, from April 29, 2010,
to June 29, 2010.
DATES: This amendment further
amending the final rule published
December 30, 2009 (74 FR 69002) is
effective April 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blane A. Workie or Daeleen M. Chesley,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel
for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–
9342 (phone), 202–366–7152 (fax),
blane.workie@dot.gov or
daeleen.chesley@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
10, 2010, the Department of
Transportation published a notice of
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register (75 FR 11075)
proposing to extend for 45 days the
compliance date of the provision in its
final rule entitled ‘‘Enhancing Airline
Passenger Protections,’’ issued December
30, 2009, that requires certificated air
carriers that account for at least 1
percent of domestic scheduled
passenger revenues (reporting carriers)
to provide certain flight delay data on
their Web sites. Under that provision, a
reporting carrier must display on its
Web site flight delay information for
each flight it operates and for each flight
its U.S. code-share partners operate for
which schedule information is
available. More specifically, the
provision requires that reporting carriers
provide on their Web sites the following
on-time performance information: (1)
Percentage of arrivals that were on
time—i.e., within 15 minutes of
scheduled arrival time; (2) the
percentage of arrivals that were more
than 30 minutes late (including special
highlighting if the flight was late more
than 50 percent of the time); and (3) the
percentage of flight cancellations if 5
percent or more of the flight’s
operations were canceled in the month
covered. As published, the effective date
of the rule is April 29, 2010.
The Department proposed this
extension of time in response to
requests by the Air Transport
Association of America (ATA), the
Regional Airline Association (RAA) and
the Air Carrier Association of America
(ACAA) that the Department of
Transportation extend the compliance
date for publishing flight delay
information on airlines’ Web sites by 90
days. The carrier associations stated that
an additional 90 days time is needed for
airlines to reprogram their computerized
reporting systems and displays.
Interested parties can read the carrier
associations’ requests to extend the
compliance date in their entirety at
DOT–OST–2010–0039. In the NPRM,
the Department tentatively agreed that
some extension of time in the
compliance date for publishing flight
delay data on airlines’ Web sites may be
warranted but was not persuaded that a
90-day extension is justified.
Comments and DOT’s Response
The Department received a total of
five comments on the NPRM. Two were
from members of industry and the
others came from consumers and
consumer associations. On the
consumer side, Flyersrights.org, a
consumer advocacy organization, filed
comments, as did two individuals. As
for industry commenters, Flights Stats,
a business that provides flight statistics
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
data, and the Air Transport Association
filed comments.
Of the individual comments, one
states generally that the Department
should not delay the implementation of
any of the provisions in the passenger
protection final rule. The second
individual notes that carriers have
developed and implemented more
complex computer systems in shorter
periods of time, and urges the
Department to reject the ‘‘wholesale
request of ATA’’ for an extension while
supporting the consideration of
individual airlines applying for an
extension. Flyersrights.org, on the other
hand, does not oppose the Department
granting the requested extension and
states that ‘‘airline passenger and their
airlines share the objective of wanting
accurate, verified information about the
timeliness or cancellation rate of flight
operations to be available to
passengers.’’ The organization notes that
airlines should provide the required
information on their Web sites as soon
as accurate information is available to
them, even if that is prior to any new
compliance date granted by the
Department.
It is not clear whether or not
FlightStats supports the carrier
associations’ requests for an extension
of the compliance date. It states that it
is ready and able to help carriers fulfill
the intention of the rule as it concerns
flight performance data collection,
processing and publishing, and can
serve as a third party entity through
which carrier and codeshare data can be
secured. FlightStats also asserts that it
can provide flight performance
information to carriers in a form that
enables them to easily display the
required data on their Web sites but
explains that it cannot assume the
liability associated with data errors or
omissions.
ATA states appreciation for the
Department’s recognition that carriers
need additional time to comply with
this requirement and also renews its
request for a 90-day extension. ATA
reiterates its concern that 45 days is not
enough time for carriers to make the
changes necessary to ensure compliance
with the additional flight time
disclosure requirements and again notes
that compliance with this new
regulation will require work in several
company disciplines that must be
completed in succession. Finally, ATA
reminds the Department that it
recognized the difficulty in modifying
carrier reporting systems and the
importance of ensuring data integrity in
allowing longer periods of time for a
carrier to comply with past changes to
14 CFR part 234.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17051
After fully considering the comments
received, the Department has
determined that some extension of time
in the compliance date for publishing
flight delay data on airlines’ Web sites
is warranted. The Department is also
persuaded that carriers need more than
a 45-day extension. As such, the
Department is revising 14 CFR 234.11 to
extend the compliance date of sections
234.11(b) and (c) by an additional 60
days until June 29, 2010. We believe
this revised compliance date, which
affords carriers a total of 180 days time
after issuance of the rule, provides the
airlines adequate time to comply with
the requirement to provide certain flight
delay data on their Web sites. As noted
in the NPRM, this extension of time is
limited to the portion of our ‘‘Enhancing
Airline Passenger Protections’’ rule
described above dealing with
publication on carrier Web sites of flight
delay data and the compliance date for
the other provisions is April 29, 2010.
We took a number of factors into
consideration in deciding to extend
until June 29, 2010, the compliance date
for the requirements pertaining to
publishing delay data on carriers’ Web
sites. We agree with Flyersrights.org, a
major proponent of passengers’ rights,
that it is important that sufficient time
be provided to carriers to enable them
to post accurate information on their
Web sites. The posting of flight delay
data would not be beneficial to
consumers if the carriers are not able to
implement and design their systems to
reflect accurate information. With
respect to ATA’s assertion that carriers
need a 90-day extension in which to
comply with this provision, the
Department notes that at least one
company, Flightstats, appears to have
much of the required flight delay data
available and states that the data can be
made available to the carriers. Further,
by extending the compliance date for
the provision in the rule that requires
airlines to publish detailed flight delay
information on their Web site until June
29, 2010, carriers will have more than
80 days time after the original effective
date of the rule to load the required
flight delay information into their
internal reservation systems. This is
because the rule requires carriers to
upload information into their internal
reservation system between the 20th
and 23rd day of the month after the
month for which the information is
being provided. By granting the carriers
a 60-day extension in the compliance
date of the provision in question (i.e.,
until June 29, 2010), carriers will have
until between July 20 and 23, 2010, or
at least 81 days after April 29, 2010, to
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
17052
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
ensure compliance with the flight time
disclosure requirements in the rule.
Taking into consideration all the
comments, including the fact that there
are limited objections to ATA’s request
for an extension of time, the Department
believes this timeline adequately
balances the benefit of having accurate
and complete flight delay data available
to consumers with the capability of
airlines to comply with the additional
requirements being imposed upon them
in a reasonable timeframe.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and the Department of
Transportation’s Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. Accordingly, this final rule
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 605(b), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement and
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), DOT
certifies that this final rule does not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The final rule does not impose any
duties or obligations on small entities.
C. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This Final Rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and therefore does
not have federalism implications.
section 3507(d), obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information it conducts, sponsors, or
requires through regulations. DOT has
determined that there are no new
information collection requirements
associated with this final rule. The final
rule allows an additional 60 days to
comply with a regulatory provision
whose paperwork impact has already
been analyzed by the Department.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department has determined that
the requirements of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
do not apply to this Final Rule.
Issued this March 30, 2010, in Washington,
DC.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 234
Air carriers, Consumer protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department further
amends 14 CFR part 234 as amended in
the final rule published December 30,
2009 (74 FR 69002), effective April 29,
2010, as follows:
PART 234—AIRLINE SERVICE
QUALITY PERFORMANCE REPORTS
1. The authority citation for Part 234
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 329 and chapters 401
and 417.
2. In § 234.11, as amended in the final
rule published December 30, 2009 (74
FR 69002), effective April 29, 2010, add
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 234.11
Disclosure to consumers.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
D. Executive Order 13084
This Final Rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13084 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because the rule does not significantly
or uniquely affect the communities of
the Indian tribal governments or impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
them, the funding and consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13084
do not apply.
*
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires
that DOT consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public and, under the provisions of PRA
[Docket No. 0907201151–0114–02]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
*
*
*
*
(d) A reporting carrier must meet the
requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section by June 29, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–7627 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 748, 750, and 762
RIN 0694–AE66
Issuance of Electronic Documents and
Related Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule enables BIS to
eliminate the paper versions of most
export and reexport licenses, notices of
denial of license applications, notices of
return of a license application without
action, notices of results of classification
requests, License Exception AGR
notification results, and encryption
review request results. This rule also
changes certain recordkeeping
requirements associated with the
elimination of paper documents. BIS is
making these changes to reduce mailing
costs and to free up staff time currently
devoted to mailing these documents for
use in other tasks.
DATES: This rule is effective May 5,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Andrukonis, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
at 202 482 6393 or e-mail
tandrukoi@bis.doc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Bureau of Industry and Security
administers an export licensing program
pursuant to the Export Administration
Regulations. As part of this program,
BIS issues various documents in
response to applications and
notifications submitted to BIS by the
public. Those documents include export
licenses, reexport licenses, notices that
an export or reexport license application
has been denied, notices that an export
or reexport license application is being
returned to the applicant without
action, responses to License Exception
AGR notifications, notices of the results
of classification requests, and notices of
the results of encryption review
requests. Collectively, these documents
are referred to in this preamble as
‘‘license related documents.’’
Currently, BIS issues license related
documents in two ways: Electronically
in BIS’s Simplified Network
Application Processing Redesign system
(SNAP–R) and on paper. Most license
related documents are issued in both
electronic and paper form. However, a
few such documents are issued only on
paper. On December 4, 2009, BIS issued
a proposed rule that would allow it to
eliminate the paper version of the
license related documents that it
currently issues both electronically in
SNAP–R and on paper (74 FR 63685,
December 4, 2009). The last day of the
comment period for that proposed rule
was February 2, 2010. BIS received no
public comments on that proposed rule.
Accordingly, this final rule adopts the
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 64 (Monday, April 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17050-17052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7627]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Part 234
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0039]
RIN No. 2105-AE00
Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections: Extension of Compliance
Date for Posting of Flight Delay Data on Web Sites
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; extension of compliance date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is extending by 60 days,
i.e., until June 29, 2010, the compliance date of the provision in its
final rule entitled ``Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections'' that
requires airlines to publish flight delay information on their Web
sites. This extension is in response to requests by several carrier
associations for an additional 90 days time for airlines to comply with
the requirement to display flight delay data on Web sites in view of
the extensive changes to carriers' reporting systems that are
necessitated by the rule and their contention that completion of these
tasks is not possible by April 29, 2010, the current effective date of
the requirement. The Department agrees that additional time to comply
with the posting of flight delay information on the carriers' Web sites
is warranted to ensure the posting of complete and accurate information
but has determined that 60 days is enough time for the carriers to do
so. Therefore, this final rule extends the compliance date for the
provision in question for an additional 60 days, from April 29, 2010,
to June 29, 2010.
DATES: This amendment further amending the final rule published
December 30, 2009 (74 FR 69002) is effective April 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blane A. Workie or Daeleen M. Chesley,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202-366-9342 (phone), 202-366-7152 (fax),
blane.workie@dot.gov or daeleen.chesley@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 10, 2010, the Department of
Transportation published a notice of
[[Page 17051]]
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register (75 FR 11075)
proposing to extend for 45 days the compliance date of the provision in
its final rule entitled ``Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections,''
issued December 30, 2009, that requires certificated air carriers that
account for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenues
(reporting carriers) to provide certain flight delay data on their Web
sites. Under that provision, a reporting carrier must display on its
Web site flight delay information for each flight it operates and for
each flight its U.S. code-share partners operate for which schedule
information is available. More specifically, the provision requires
that reporting carriers provide on their Web sites the following on-
time performance information: (1) Percentage of arrivals that were on
time--i.e., within 15 minutes of scheduled arrival time; (2) the
percentage of arrivals that were more than 30 minutes late (including
special highlighting if the flight was late more than 50 percent of the
time); and (3) the percentage of flight cancellations if 5 percent or
more of the flight's operations were canceled in the month covered. As
published, the effective date of the rule is April 29, 2010.
The Department proposed this extension of time in response to
requests by the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), the
Regional Airline Association (RAA) and the Air Carrier Association of
America (ACAA) that the Department of Transportation extend the
compliance date for publishing flight delay information on airlines'
Web sites by 90 days. The carrier associations stated that an
additional 90 days time is needed for airlines to reprogram their
computerized reporting systems and displays. Interested parties can
read the carrier associations' requests to extend the compliance date
in their entirety at DOT-OST-2010-0039. In the NPRM, the Department
tentatively agreed that some extension of time in the compliance date
for publishing flight delay data on airlines' Web sites may be
warranted but was not persuaded that a 90-day extension is justified.
Comments and DOT's Response
The Department received a total of five comments on the NPRM. Two
were from members of industry and the others came from consumers and
consumer associations. On the consumer side, Flyersrights.org, a
consumer advocacy organization, filed comments, as did two individuals.
As for industry commenters, Flights Stats, a business that provides
flight statistics data, and the Air Transport Association filed
comments.
Of the individual comments, one states generally that the
Department should not delay the implementation of any of the provisions
in the passenger protection final rule. The second individual notes
that carriers have developed and implemented more complex computer
systems in shorter periods of time, and urges the Department to reject
the ``wholesale request of ATA'' for an extension while supporting the
consideration of individual airlines applying for an extension.
Flyersrights.org, on the other hand, does not oppose the Department
granting the requested extension and states that ``airline passenger
and their airlines share the objective of wanting accurate, verified
information about the timeliness or cancellation rate of flight
operations to be available to passengers.'' The organization notes that
airlines should provide the required information on their Web sites as
soon as accurate information is available to them, even if that is
prior to any new compliance date granted by the Department.
It is not clear whether or not FlightStats supports the carrier
associations' requests for an extension of the compliance date. It
states that it is ready and able to help carriers fulfill the intention
of the rule as it concerns flight performance data collection,
processing and publishing, and can serve as a third party entity
through which carrier and codeshare data can be secured. FlightStats
also asserts that it can provide flight performance information to
carriers in a form that enables them to easily display the required
data on their Web sites but explains that it cannot assume the
liability associated with data errors or omissions.
ATA states appreciation for the Department's recognition that
carriers need additional time to comply with this requirement and also
renews its request for a 90-day extension. ATA reiterates its concern
that 45 days is not enough time for carriers to make the changes
necessary to ensure compliance with the additional flight time
disclosure requirements and again notes that compliance with this new
regulation will require work in several company disciplines that must
be completed in succession. Finally, ATA reminds the Department that it
recognized the difficulty in modifying carrier reporting systems and
the importance of ensuring data integrity in allowing longer periods of
time for a carrier to comply with past changes to 14 CFR part 234.
After fully considering the comments received, the Department has
determined that some extension of time in the compliance date for
publishing flight delay data on airlines' Web sites is warranted. The
Department is also persuaded that carriers need more than a 45-day
extension. As such, the Department is revising 14 CFR 234.11 to extend
the compliance date of sections 234.11(b) and (c) by an additional 60
days until June 29, 2010. We believe this revised compliance date,
which affords carriers a total of 180 days time after issuance of the
rule, provides the airlines adequate time to comply with the
requirement to provide certain flight delay data on their Web sites. As
noted in the NPRM, this extension of time is limited to the portion of
our ``Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections'' rule described above
dealing with publication on carrier Web sites of flight delay data and
the compliance date for the other provisions is April 29, 2010.
We took a number of factors into consideration in deciding to
extend until June 29, 2010, the compliance date for the requirements
pertaining to publishing delay data on carriers' Web sites. We agree
with Flyersrights.org, a major proponent of passengers' rights, that it
is important that sufficient time be provided to carriers to enable
them to post accurate information on their Web sites. The posting of
flight delay data would not be beneficial to consumers if the carriers
are not able to implement and design their systems to reflect accurate
information. With respect to ATA's assertion that carriers need a 90-
day extension in which to comply with this provision, the Department
notes that at least one company, Flightstats, appears to have much of
the required flight delay data available and states that the data can
be made available to the carriers. Further, by extending the compliance
date for the provision in the rule that requires airlines to publish
detailed flight delay information on their Web site until June 29,
2010, carriers will have more than 80 days time after the original
effective date of the rule to load the required flight delay
information into their internal reservation systems. This is because
the rule requires carriers to upload information into their internal
reservation system between the 20th and 23rd day of the month after the
month for which the information is being provided. By granting the
carriers a 60-day extension in the compliance date of the provision in
question (i.e., until June 29, 2010), carriers will have until between
July 20 and 23, 2010, or at least 81 days after April 29, 2010, to
[[Page 17052]]
ensure compliance with the flight time disclosure requirements in the
rule. Taking into consideration all the comments, including the fact
that there are limited objections to ATA's request for an extension of
time, the Department believes this timeline adequately balances the
benefit of having accurate and complete flight delay data available to
consumers with the capability of airlines to comply with the additional
requirements being imposed upon them in a reasonable timeframe.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This final rule is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and the Department of Transportation's Regulatory
Policies and Procedures. Accordingly, this final rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 605(b), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), DOT certifies that this final rule
does not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The final rule does not impose any duties or obligations on
small entities.
C. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This Final Rule does not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and therefore does not have federalism
implications.
D. Executive Order 13084
This Final Rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13084 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because the rule does
not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of the Indian
tribal governments or impose substantial direct compliance costs on
them, the funding and consultation requirements of Executive Order
13084 do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
requires that DOT consider the impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed on the public and, under the
provisions of PRA section 3507(d), obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information it
conducts, sponsors, or requires through regulations. DOT has determined
that there are no new information collection requirements associated
with this final rule. The final rule allows an additional 60 days to
comply with a regulatory provision whose paperwork impact has already
been analyzed by the Department.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department has determined that the requirements of Title II of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to this Final
Rule.
Issued this March 30, 2010, in Washington, DC.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 234
Air carriers, Consumer protection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department further
amends 14 CFR part 234 as amended in the final rule published December
30, 2009 (74 FR 69002), effective April 29, 2010, as follows:
PART 234--AIRLINE SERVICE QUALITY PERFORMANCE REPORTS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 234 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 329 and chapters 401 and 417.
0
2. In Sec. 234.11, as amended in the final rule published December 30,
2009 (74 FR 69002), effective April 29, 2010, add paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 234.11 Disclosure to consumers.
* * * * *
(d) A reporting carrier must meet the requirements of paragraphs
(b) and (c) of this section by June 29, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010-7627 Filed 4-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P