Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; LUSEDRA, 17142-17143 [2010-7516]
Download as PDF
17142
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Respondents: Business or other for–
profit, not–for–profit institutions, and
state, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 3,788 respondents; 3,788
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: .25
minutes.
Frequency of Response: One time
reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. 308(b).
Total Annual Burden: 947 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
No questions of a confidential nature are
asked.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this expiring information
collection to the Office of Management
and Budget during this comment period
under delegated authority. The
Commission inadvertently published a
regular notice rather than a delegated
notice announcing submission of this
information collection at the end of the
60 day comment period which was
March 29, 2010 (75 FR 4077, January 26,
2010). Therefore, the Commission is
required to publish a 30 day notice
following a regular notice. The
Commission is reporting no change to
the reporting requirement. However,
there is a 1,436 hour reduction
adjustment to the total annual burden
hours since the last submission to the
OMB in 2007. This reduction is due to
5,743 fewer respondents.
This rule section requires that affected
applicants to submit a list of any radio
facilities they hold within 40 miles of
the base station transmitter site being
applied for. This information is used to
determine if an applicant’s proposed
system is necessary in light of
communications facilities it already
owns. Such a determination helps the
Commission to equitably distribute
limited spectrum and prevents spectrum
warehousing. The information is
collected only once – upon initial
license application.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary,
Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–7557 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–S
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than April 19,
2010.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
(A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice President)
701 East Byrd Street, Richmond,
Virginia 23261-4528:
1. David Muldrow Beasley, Society
Hill, South Carolina, individually and
as a member of a group acting in concert
including Henry Wesley Beasley,
Richard Lewis Beasley, both of
Florence, South Carolina, and Richard
Lee Beasley, Society Hill, South
Carolina, to retain control of First
Carolina Bancshares Corporation,
Darlington, South Carolina, and thereby
indirectly retain control of Carolina
Bank and Trust Company, Lamar, South
Carolina.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 31, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–7613 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than April 28, 2010.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
(Anne MacEwen, Bank Applications
Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York,
New York 10045-0001:
1. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.,
New York, New York, to acquire up to
24.9 percent of SKBHC Holdings LLC,
Corona del Mar, California, which is
applying to become a bank holding
company, and thereby indirectly acquire
Starbuck Bancshares, Inc. and The First
National Bank of Starbuck, both of
Starbuck, Minnesota.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 31, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–7614 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
Food and Drug Administration
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket Nos. FDA–2009–E–0202 and FDA–
2009–E–0204]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; LUSEDRA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 64 / Monday, April 5, 2010 / Notices
LUSEDRA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of
applications to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product LUSEDRA
(fospropofol disodium). LUSEDRA is a
sedative-hypnotic agent indicated for
monitored anesthesia care sedation in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Apr 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
adult patients undergoing diagnostic or
therapeutic procedures. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received patent term restoration
applications for LUSEDRA (U.S. Patent
Nos. 6,204,257 and 6,872,838) from
University of Kansas, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining the patents’
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated September 29, 2009, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of LUSEDRA
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
LUSEDRA is 2,405 days. Of this time,
1,962 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 443 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: May 15, 2002.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on May 15, 2002.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: September 27, 2007.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA)
22–244 was submitted on September 27,
2007.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 12, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–244 was approved on December 12,
2008.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,424 days of patent
term extension for patent no. 6,204,257
and 899 days of patent term extension
for patent no. 6,872,838.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 4, 2010.
Furthermore, any interested person may
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17143
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 4, 2010. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–7516 Filed 4–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–D–0495]
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food
and Drug Administration Staff; Medical
Devices; Neurological and Physical
Medicine Device Guidance Documents;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of draft special controls
guidance documents for 11 neurological
and physical medicine devices. FDA has
developed a draft special controls
guidance document for each of the 11
devices. These draft guidance
documents describe a means by which
these devices may comply with the
requirement of special controls for class
II devices. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, FDA is publishing a
proposed rule that would designate
special controls for each of these
devices and would exempt six of them
from the premarket notification
requirements of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act). These draft
guidance documents are not final nor
are they in effect at this time.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance documents at any time
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 64 (Monday, April 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17142-17143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7516]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA-2009-E-0202 and FDA-2009-E-0204]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; LUSEDRA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for
[[Page 17143]]
LUSEDRA and is publishing this notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of
applications to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human drug
product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product LUSEDRA
(fospropofol disodium). LUSEDRA is a sedative-hypnotic agent indicated
for monitored anesthesia care sedation in adult patients undergoing
diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Subsequent to this approval, the
Patent and Trademark Office received patent term restoration
applications for LUSEDRA (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,204,257 and 6,872,838)
from University of Kansas, and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA's assistance in determining the patents' eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated September 29, 2009, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product
had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of
LUSEDRA represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of
the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
LUSEDRA is 2,405 days. Of this time, 1,962 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 443 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
May 15, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the
investigational new drug application became effective was on May 15,
2002.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: September 27,
2007. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) 22-244 was submitted on September 27, 2007.
3. The date the application was approved: December 12, 2008. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-244 was approved on
December 12, 2008.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,424 days of
patent term extension for patent no. 6,204,257 and 899 days of patent
term extension for patent no. 6,872,838.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by June 4, 2010. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by October 4,
2010. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 22, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-7516 Filed 4-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S