Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 and A310 Airplanes, 16685-16689 [2010-7459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight.
(1) For Group 1, Configuration 1 airplanes,
as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777–57A0069, dated November 5, 2009:
Before the accumulation of 3,500 total flight
cycles, or within 500 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
(2) For Group 1, Configuration 2 airplanes
and Group 2 airplanes, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–57A0069,
dated November 5, 2009, on which a crack
was found in the cutout keyway when the
cutout keyway was changed: Within 1,125
days after the effective date of this AD.
Note 1: For Group 1, Configuration 2
airplanes and Group 2 airplanes, as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
57A0069, dated November 5, 2009, on which
no crack was found in the cutout keyway
when the cutout keyway was changed: No
further action is required by this AD.
Exceptions to Service Bulletin
(h) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777–57A0069, dated
November 5, 2009, specifies to contact
Boeing for appropriate action: Before further
flight, repair the crack using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Duong Tran, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6452; fax
(425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–7458 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0281; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–184–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300–600 and A310 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: Surface defects were
visually detected on the rudder of one
Airbus A319 and one A321 in-service
aeroplane. Investigation has determined
that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had
been reworked in production. The
investigation confirmed that the defects
were the result of de-bonding between
the skin and honeycomb core. Such
reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes. An extended de-bonding, if
not detected and corrected, may degrade
the structural integrity of the rudder.
The loss of the rudder leads to
degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16685
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0281; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–184–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day
comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation
authorities of other countries to provide
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
16686
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules
adequate time for interested parties to
submit comments. The comment period
for these proposed ADs is now typically
45 days, which is consistent with the
comment period for domestic transport
ADs.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2010–0002,
dated January 5, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Surface defects were visually detected on
the rudder of one Airbus A319 and one A321
in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had been
reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of
de-bonding between the skin and honeycomb
core. Such reworks were also performed on
some rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected
and corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder
leads to degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this
EASA AD] requires inspections of specific
areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those
rudders where production reworks have been
identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * also requires
for the vacuum loss hole restoration:
—A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced
area instead of the local thermographic
inspection, which is maintained for nonreinforced areas, and
—Additional work performance for rudders
on which this thermographic inspection
has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss
inspections and elasticity laminate
checker inspections for defects
including de-bonding between the skin
and honeycomb core of the rudder, and
ultrasonic inspections for rudders on
which temporary restoration with resin
or permanent vacuum loss hole
restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the
manufacturer for repair instructions and
doing the repair. We are considering
similar rulemaking action on Models
A319 and A321 airplanes. You may
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex
(AOT) A300–55A6047, Revision 02,
dated October 12, 2009; and AOT A310–
55A2048, Revision 02, dated October
12, 2009. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 194 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 4 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$65,960, or $340 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2010–0281;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–184–AD.
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
16687
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 17,
2010.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300
B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R,
B4–622R, F4–605R, F4–622R, and C4–605R
Variant F airplanes; and Model A310–203,
–204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and –325
Affected ADs
(b) None.
airplanes; certificated in any category;
equipped with carbon fiber reinforced plastic
rudders having part numbers and serial
numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1—RUDDER INFORMATION
Affected rudder
serial No.
Rudder part No.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–014–00
A554–71500–014–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–026–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 55: Stabilizers.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Surface defects were visually detected on
the rudder of one Airbus A319 and one A321
in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had been
reworked in production. The investigation
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
confirmed that the defects were the result of
de-bonding between the skin and honeycomb
core. Such reworks were also performed on
some rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected
and corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder
leads to degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this
EASA AD] requires inspections of specific
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
HF–1017
HF–1020
HF–1059
HF–1061
HF–1064
HF–1087
HF–1119
HF–1189
HF–1203
HF–1266
TS–1405
TS–2001
TS–2004
TS–2007
TS–2009
TS–2011
TS–2012
TS–2013
TS–2014
TS–2016
TS–2017
TS–2018
TS–2020
TS–2021
TS–2022
TS–2024
TS–2025
TS–2026
TS–2028
TS–2029
TS–2031
TS–2032
TS–2035
TS–2040
TS–2041
TS–2044
TS–2046
TS–2050
TS–2056
TS–2058
TS–2060
TS–2062
TS–2065
TS–2066
TS–2074
TS–2075
TS–2076
TS–2079
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
Core density
24 kg/m3
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those
rudders where production reworks have been
identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * also requires
for the vacuum loss hole restoration:
—A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced
area instead of the local thermographic
inspection, which is maintained for nonreinforced areas, and
—Additional work performance for rudders
on which this thermographic inspection
has been performed in the reinforced area.
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
16688
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules
The inspections include vacuum loss
inspections and elasticity laminate checker
inspections for defects including de-bonding
between the skin and honeycomb core of the
rudder, and ultrasonic inspections for
rudders on which temporary restoration with
resin or permanent vacuum loss hole
restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the
manufacturer for repair instructions and
doing the repair. We are considering similar
rulemaking action on Models A319 and A321
airplanes.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions and Compliance
(g) For rudders with a honeycomb core
density of 24 kg/m3, as identified in Table 1
of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(10) of this AD,
in accordance with Airbus All Operators
Telex (AOT) A310–55A2048 or A300–
55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, as applicable.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8
months after the effective date of this AD, do
a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects
including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24
months after the effective date of this AD, do
an elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD two times at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles,
but not fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from
the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper
edge/leading edge/other locations): Within 8
months after the effective date of this AD, do
an elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, do a vacuum loss inspection
on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/
leading edge/other locations) to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(6) of this AD
terminates the initial and repetitive
inspections required by paragraphs (g)(4) and
(g)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), or (g)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
(9) If no defects are found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(6) of this AD, before further flight, restore
the vacuum loss holes with temporary
restoration with self-adhesive patches,
temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
protection, and repeat the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(3) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles
until permanent restoration is completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in paragraph (g)(10)(i) or
(g)(10)(ii) of this AD: Report the inspection
results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/SEER3,
Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax
+33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective
date of this AD: Within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
accomplishment of the inspection.
(11) If no defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in (g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii):
Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS,
Jean-Luc BOITEUX, SEES1, Customer
Services, fax (0) 5 61 93 36 14; or e-mail to
jean-luc.j.boiteux@airbus.com.
(h) For rudders not having a honeycomb
core density of 24 kg/m3, as identified in
Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required
in paragraph (h)(1) through (h)(10) of this AD
in accordance with Airbus AOT A310–
55A2048 or AOT A300–55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as
applicable.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, do a vacuum
loss inspection to detect defects including
de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 24 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, do an
elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD two times at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles,
but not fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from
the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper
edge/leading edge/other locations): Within 8
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, do an
elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (h)(4) of this AD at intervals not
to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the rudder has
accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first
installation, or within 24 months after the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do a vacuum loss inspection on the
other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading
edge/other location) to detect defects
including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(6) of this AD
terminates the initial and repetitive
inspections required by paragraphs (h)(4) and
(h)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), or (h)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
(9) If no defects are found during the
inspections required by paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(6) of this AD, before further flight, restore
the vacuum loss holes with the temporary
restoration with self adhesive patches,
temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface
protection, and repeat the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles
until permanent restoration is completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in paragraph (h)(10)(i) or
(h)(10)(ii) of this AD: Report the inspection
results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/SEER3,
Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax
+33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective
date of this AD: Within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
accomplishment of the inspection.
(11) If no defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in (h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii):
Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS,
Jean-Luc BOITEUX, SEES1, Customer
Services, fax (0) 5 61 93 36 14; or e-mail to
jean-luc.j.boiteux@airbus.com.
(i) Actions done before the effective date of
this AD, in accordance with the service
information listed in Table 2 of this AD, are
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD for the areas inspected, for any rudder
listed in Table 1 of this AD.
(j) Additional areas requiring inspection for
all airplanes are defined in Airbus AOT
A310–55A2048 or AOT A300–55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as
applicable. For these additional areas, do the
actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, as applicable, at the times specified
in those paragraphs. For all areas, do the
repetitive inspections required by paragraphs
(g) and (h) of this AD as applicable at the
times specified in those paragraphs.
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
16689
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—CREDIT SERVICE INFORMATION
Airbus AOT—
A300–55A6047
A300–55A6047
A310–55A2048
A310–55A2048
Revision—
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
............................................................
(k) For rudders on which temporary
restoration with resin or permanent vacuum
loss hole restoration has been done in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin in Table 2 of this AD, as required in
paragraph (g)(9) or (h)(9) of this AD, before
the effective date of this AD: Within 4,500
flight cycles from the restoration date, do an
ultrasonic inspection for defects, including
debonding of the reinforced area, in
accordance with Airbus AOT A310–55A2048
or AOT A300–55A6047, both Revision 02,
both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
If any defect is found, before further flight,
contact Airbus for repair instructions and do
the repair.
(l) After the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any rudder listed in Table
1 of this AD on any airplane, unless the
rudder has been inspected and all applicable
corrective actions have been done in
accordance with paragraph (g) or (h) of this
AD.
FAA AD Differences
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
14:33 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0002, dated January 5, 2010;
and Airbus AOT A310–55A2048, Revision
02, dated October 12, 2009, or Airbus AOT
A300–55A6047, Revision 02, dated October
12, 2009; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–7459 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Original ........................................................................
01 ................................................................................
Original ........................................................................
01 ................................................................................
Federal Aviation Administration
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0279; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–148–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A318, A319, A320, and A321 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: Surface defects were
visually detected on the rudder of one
A319 and one A321 in-service
aeroplane. Investigation has determined
that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had
been reworked in production. The
investigation confirmed that the defects
were a result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. An extended
de-bonding, if not detected and
corrected, may degrade the structural
PO 00000
Dated—
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
May 11, 2009.
July 8, 2009.
May 11, 2009.
July 8, 2009.
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the
handling qualities and reduces the
controllability of the aeroplane.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221
or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 63 (Friday, April 2, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16685-16689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7459]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0281; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 and A310
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of
one Airbus A319 and one A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation confirmed
that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the skin and
honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some rudders fitted
on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes. An extended de-bonding, if not
detected and corrected, may degrade the structural integrity of the
rudder. The loss of the rudder leads to degradation of the handling
qualities and reduces the controllability of the aeroplane.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0281;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide
[[Page 16686]]
adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The comment
period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which is
consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0002, dated January 5, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of one
Airbus A319 and one A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * also requires for the vacuum loss
hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--Additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity laminate
checker inspections for defects including de-bonding between the skin
and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic inspections for
rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or permanent vacuum
loss hole restoration has been performed. The corrective action is
contacting the manufacturer for repair instructions and doing the
repair. We are considering similar rulemaking action on Models A319 and
A321 airplanes. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) A300-55A6047, Revision
02, dated October 12, 2009; and AOT A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated
October 12, 2009. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 194 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 4 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $65,960, or $340 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2010-0281; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
184-AD.
[[Page 16687]]
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620,
B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, F4-622R, and C4-605R Variant F
airplanes; and Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324,
and -325 airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with
carbon fiber reinforced plastic rudders having part numbers and
serial numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Rudder Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rudder part No. Affected rudder serial No. Core density 24 kg/m\3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A554-71500-016-91.......................... HF-1017.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-016-91.......................... HF-1020.......................... No.
A554-71500-016-91.......................... HF-1059.......................... No.
A554-71500-016-91.......................... HF-1061.......................... No.
A554-71500-016-91.......................... HF-1064.......................... No.
A554-71500-014-00.......................... HF-1087.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-014-00.......................... HF-1119.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-016-00.......................... HF-1189.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-016-00.......................... HF-1203.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-016-00.......................... HF-1266.......................... Yes.
A554-71500-026-00.......................... TS-1405.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2001.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2004.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2007.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2009.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2011.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2012.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2013.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2014.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2016.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2017.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2018.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2020.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2021.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2022.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2024.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2025.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2026.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2028.......................... No.
A554-71710-000-00.......................... TS-2029.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2031.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2032.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2035.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2040.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2041.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2044.......................... No.
A554-71710-002-00.......................... TS-2046.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2050.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2056.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2058.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2060.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2062.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2065.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2066.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2074.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2075.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2076.......................... No.
A554-71710-004-00.......................... TS-2079.......................... No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55:
Stabilizers.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of one
Airbus A319 and one A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * also requires for the vacuum loss
hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--Additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
[[Page 16688]]
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity
laminate checker inspections for defects including de-bonding
between the skin and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic
inspections for rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the manufacturer for repair
instructions and doing the repair. We are considering similar
rulemaking action on Models A319 and A321 airplanes.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions and Compliance
(g) For rudders with a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/m\3\, as
identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(10) of this AD, in accordance with
Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A310-55A2048 or A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months after the
effective date of this AD, do a vacuum loss inspection to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, do
an elasticity laminate checker inspection to detect defects
including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
vacuum loss inspection on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/
leading edge/other locations) to detect defects including de-
bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(g)(6) of this AD terminates the initial and repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (g)(4) and (g)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), or (g)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with temporary restoration with self-
adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or permanent
restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (g)(3) of this AD at intervals not
to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in paragraph (g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii) of this AD:
Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/SEER3,
Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com, or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(11) If no defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in (g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii): Report the inspection
results to Airbus SAS, Jean-Luc BOITEUX, SEES1, Customer Services,
fax (0) 5 61 93 36 14; or e-mail to jean-luc.j.boiteux@airbus.com.
(h) For rudders not having a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/
m\3\, as identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required
in paragraph (h)(1) through (h)(10) of this AD in accordance with
Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both
dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months after the rudder
has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, do a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects
including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months after the
rudder has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first
installation, or within 24 months after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later, do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 8 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do an elasticity
laminate checker inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 24 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do a vacuum
loss inspection on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading
edge/other location) to detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(h)(6) of this AD terminates the initial and repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), or (h)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during the inspections required by
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with the temporary restoration with
self adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat
the inspection required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD at intervals
not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in paragraph (h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii) of this AD:
Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/SEER3,
Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com, or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(11) If no defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time in (h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii): Report the inspection
results to Airbus SAS, Jean-Luc BOITEUX, SEES1, Customer Services,
fax (0) 5 61 93 36 14; or e-mail to jean-luc.j.boiteux@airbus.com.
(i) Actions done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the service information listed in Table 2 of this
AD, are acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for the areas inspected, for any
rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD.
(j) Additional areas requiring inspection for all airplanes are
defined in Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable. For these
additional areas, do the actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h)
of this AD, as applicable, at the times specified in those
paragraphs. For all areas, do the repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD as applicable at the times
specified in those paragraphs.
[[Page 16689]]
Table 2--Credit Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus AOT-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300-55A6047......................... Original............... May 11, 2009.
A300-55A6047......................... 01..................... July 8, 2009.
A310-55A2048......................... Original............... May 11, 2009.
A310-55A2048......................... 01..................... July 8, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(k) For rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been done in accordance
with the applicable service bulletin in Table 2 of this AD, as
required in paragraph (g)(9) or (h)(9) of this AD, before the
effective date of this AD: Within 4,500 flight cycles from the
restoration date, do an ultrasonic inspection for defects, including
debonding of the reinforced area, in accordance with Airbus AOT
A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, as applicable. If any defect is found, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(l) After the effective date of this AD, no person may install
any rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD on any airplane, unless the
rudder has been inspected and all applicable corrective actions have
been done in accordance with paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0002, dated January 5, 2010; and Airbus
AOT A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009, or Airbus AOT
A300-55A6047, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-7459 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P