Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bob Rahimzadeh, 16735-16737 [2010-7437]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Notices
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Fourth, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Aqua-Loop by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
Fifth, that the Charging Letter, the
Settlement Agreement, and this Order
shall be made available to the public.
Sixth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Issued this 25th day of March, 2010.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–7439 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[09–BIS–005]
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Bob Rahimzadeh
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
In the Matter of: Bob Rahimzadeh, 116
Hopper Lane, Folsom, CA 95630,
Respondent; Order Relating to Bob
Rahimzadeh.
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’),
initiated this administrative proceeding
against Bob Rahimzadeh
(‘‘Rahimzadeh’’) pursuant to Section
766.3 of the Export Administration
Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’) 1, and
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2009). The violations occurred in 2004 and
2005. The Regulations governing the violation at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:40 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
16735
Section 13(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(the ‘‘Act’’) 2, through the issuance and
filing of a charging letter as to
Rahimzadeh that alleges that
Rahimzadeh has committed four
violations of the Regulations (‘‘Charging
Letter’’). Specifically, these charges are:
existence or authenticity of the end-user
or other party to the transaction,
published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2006. 71 FR 61706 (Oct. 19,
2006).
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed
one violation of Section 764.2(b) of the
Regulations.
Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(b)—Causing,
Aiding or Abetting
Between on or about July 26, 2004,
and on or about September 28, 2004,
Rahimzadeh caused, aided or abetted
the doing of an act prohibited by the
Regulations by facilitating or
coordinating the export of
approximately 174 rolls of hog hair filter
media, part number HH60130 and
valued at approximately $11,687.76,
items which are subject to the
Regulations and designated as EAR99
items,3 through the United Arab
Emirates (‘‘U.A.E.’’) to Iran without the
required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section
560.204 of the Iranian Transactions
Regulations (‘‘ITR’’) 4 maintained by the
U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office
of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’), an
export to a third country intended for
transshipment to Iran is a transaction
that requires OFAC authorization.
Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, no person may engage in
the exportation of an item subject to
both the Regulations and the ITR
without authorization from OFAC. No
OFAC authorization was sought or
obtained for the transaction described
herein. Rahimzadeh took this action
after having been asked by Parto
Abgardan Cooling Towers Co. (‘‘Parto
Abgardan’’), an Iranian company, to
arrange for the export of the items to
Iran ‘‘via Dubai.’’ Parto Abgardan did not
have a location in the U.A.E., and the
address to which Rahimzadeh arranged
for the items to be exported, ‘‘do Parto
Abgardan,’’ was in fact subsequently
added to the BIS Unverified List of
entities involved in transactions in
which BIS is unable to verify the
Charge 2 15 CFR 764.2(e)—Acting
With Knowledge of a Violation
Between on or about July 26, 2004,
and on or about September 28, 2004,
Rahimzadeh ordered or financed items
to be exported from the United States
with knowledge that a violation of the
Regulations was occurring, was about to
occur or was intended to occur in
connection with the items. Specifically,
between on or about July 26, 2004, and
on or about September 28, 2004,
Rahimzadeh ordered or financed
approximately 174 rolls of hog hair filter
media, part number HH60130 and
valued at approximately $11,687.76,
items which are subject to the
Regulations and designated as EAR99,
which Rahimzadeh knew would be
exported to Iran via the U.A.E. without
the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section
560.204 of the ITR, an export to a third
country intended for transshipment to
Iran is a transaction that requires OFAC
authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7
of the Regulations, no person may
engage in the exportation of an item
subject to both the Regulations and the
ITR without authorization from OFAC.
Rahimzadeh knew that no OFAC
authorization was sought or obtained for
the transaction described herein.
Rahimzadeh had knowledge that a
violation was occurring, was about to
occur or was intended to occur in
connection with the items because he
was aware of the U.S. embargo of Iran
and had knowledge that exporting items
through the U.A.E. to Iran was a
violation of U.S. law. Rahimzadeh
stated to a BIS Office of Export
Enforcement special agent in an
interview on or about October 14, 2005,
that approximately three years earlier he
had become aware of sanctions barring
the shipment of items to Iran and that
he understood that knowingly shipping
items to Iran through a third country
was illegal. Rahimzadeh referred to this
type of activity as ‘‘diverting’’ items to
Iran. Moreover, on or about September
23, 1997, Rahimzadeh had issued a
letter to Parto Abgardan stating, ‘‘I am
trying to find a way to send the
components that I promised to you.
Unfortunately after many unsuccessful
attempts, I came to a conclusion that the
only way to open this channel is what
you were thinking, and if I understood
issue are found in the 2004 and 2005 versions of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2004–2005)). The 2009 Regulations establish
the procedures that apply to this matter.
2 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. p. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 13,
2009 (74 FR 41325 (Aug. 14, 2009)) has continued
the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq.) (‘‘IEEPA’’).
3 EAR99 is a designation for items subject to the
Regulations but not listed on the Commerce Control
List. 15 CFR 734.3(c).
4 31 CFR part 560.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
16736
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
correctly, you are going to have some
kind of agent or office in one of the Gulf
countries. I tell you this that I would
have no problem getting a container to
my place and loading to a steam ship
toward Dubai. * * * Many shipping
companies express that you shouldn’t
have any major problem getting the
goods to Tehran from Dubai.’’
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed
one violation of Section 764.2(e) of the
Regulations.
Charge 3 15 CFR 764.2(b)—Causing,
Aiding or Abetting
Between on or about February 9,
2005, and on or about April 19, 2005,
Rahimzadeh caused, aided, or abetted
the doing of an act prohibited by the
Regulations by facilitating or
coordinating the export of
approximately 185 rolls of hog hair filter
media, part number HHB60130 and
valued at approximately $9,838.30,
items which are subject to the
Regulations and designated as EAR99
items, through the U.A.E. to Iran
without the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section
560.204 of the ITR maintained by
OFAC, an export to a third country
intended for transshipment to Iran is a
transaction that requires OFAC
authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7
of the Regulations, no person may
engage in the exportation of an item
subject to both the Regulations and the
ITR without authorization from OFAC.
No OFAC authorization was sought or
obtained for the transaction described
herein.
Specifically, after exporting certain
hog hair filter media to Parto Abgardan
in Iran, as described in Charges 1–2,
Rahimzadeh was informed by Parto
Abgardan that the items were not
exactly the same as a sample
Rahimzadeh had previously brought to
Parto Abgardan before the transaction
described in Charges 1–2 occurred.
Rahimzadeh received from Parto
Abgardan a piece of the original sample
as well as a piece of the items described
in Charges 1–2. Rahimzadeh then
provided both pieces to the U.S.
distributor, and placed a new order for
185 rolls of hog hair filter media, part
number HHB60130, with the U.S.
distributor. Rahimzadeh arranged for
the U.S. distributor to supply the items,
which were destined for Iran, to a
freight forwarder for initial shipment to
the U.A.E., ‘‘c/o Parto Abgardan.’’ Parto
Abgardan did not have a location in the
U.A.E., and the address to which
Rahimzadeh arranged for the items to be
exported, ‘‘c/o Parto Abgardan,’’ was in
fact added to the BIS Unverified List of
entities involved in transactions in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:40 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
which BIS is unable to verify the
existence or authenticity of the end-user
or other party to the transaction,
published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2006. 71 FR 61706 (Oct. 19,
2006).
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed
one violation of Section 764.2(b) of the
Regulations.
Charge 4 15 CFR 764.2(e)—Acting
With Knowledge of a Violation
Between on or about February 9,
2005, and on or about April 19, 2005,
Rahimzadeh ordered items to be
exported from the United States with
knowledge that a violation of the
Regulations was occurring, was about to
occur or was intended to occur in
connection with the items. Specifically,
between on or about February 9, 2005,
and on or about April 19, 2005,
Rahimzadeh ordered approximately 185
rolls of hog hair filter media, part
number HHB60130 and valued at
approximately $9,838.30, items which
are subject to the Regulations and
designated as EAR99, which
Rahimzadeh knew would be exported to
Iran via the U.A.E. without the required
U.S. Government authorization.
Pursuant to Section 560.204 of the ITR,
an export to a third country intended for
transshipment to Iran is a transaction
that requires OFAC authorization.
Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, no person may engage in
the exportation of an item subject to
both the Regulations and the ITR
without authorization from OFAC.
Rahimzadeh knew that no OFAC
authorization was sought or obtained for
the transaction described herein.
Rahimzadeh had knowledge that a
violation was occurring, was about to
occur or was intended to occur in
connection with the items because
Rahimzadeh was aware of the U.S.
embargo of Iran and had knowledge that
exporting items through the U.A.E. to
Iran was a violation of U.S. law.
Rahimzadeh stated to a BIS Office of
Export Enforcement special agent in an
interview on or about October 14, 2005,
that approximately three years earlier he
had become aware of sanctions barring
the shipment of items to Iran and that
he understood that knowingly shipping
items to Iran through a third country
was illegal. Rahimzadeh referred to this
type of activity as ‘‘diverting’’ items to
Iran. Moreover, on or about September
23, 1997, Rahimzadeh had issued a
letter to Parto Abgardan stating, ‘‘I am
trying to find a way to send the
components that I promised to you.
Unfortunately after many unsuccessful
attempts, I came to a conclusion that the
only way to open this channel is what
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
you were thinking, and if I understood
correctly, you are going to have some
kind of agent or office in one of the Gulf
countries. I tell you this that I would
have no problem getting a container to
my place and loading to a steam ship
toward Dubai. * * * Many shipping
companies express that you shouldn’t
have any major problem getting the
goods to Tehran from Dubai.’’
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed
one violation of Section 764.2(e) of the
Regulations.
Whereas, BIS and Rahimzadeh have
entered into a Settlement Agreement
pursuant to Section 766.18(b) of the
Regulations, whereby they agreed to
settle this matter in accordance with the
terms and conditions set forth therein;
and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
of such Settlement Agreement; it is
therefore ordered:
First, Rahimzadeh shall be assessed a
civil penalty in the amount of $100,000,
the payment of which shall be
suspended for a period of ten (10) years
from the date of this Order, and
thereafter shall be waived, provided that
during the period of suspension,
Rahimzadeh has committed no violation
of the Act, or any regulation, order, or
license issued thereunder.
Second, that for a period of ten (10)
years from the date of this Order,
Rahimzadeh, his representatives,
assigns or agents (‘‘Denied Person’’) may
not participate, directly or indirectly, in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Third, that no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 63 / Friday, April 2, 2010 / Notices
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Fourth, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Rahimzadeh by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
Fifth, that the Charging Letter, the
Settlement Agreement, and this Order
shall be made available to the public.
Sixth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Issued this 25th day of March 2010.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–7437 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:40 Apr 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
U.S. Bureau of the Census
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Generic Clearance
for Questionnaire Pretesting Research
U.S. Census Bureau.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
SUMMARY:
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dhynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Theresa J. DeMaio, U.S.
Census Bureau, Room 5K–319, 4600
Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC
20233–9150, (301) 763–4894 (or via the
Internet at
theresa.j.demaio@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau plans to request
an extension of the current OMB
approval to conduct a variety of smallscale questionnaire pretesting activities
under this generic clearance. A block of
hours will be dedicated to these
activities for each of the next three
years. OMB will be informed in writing
of the purpose and scope of each of
these activities, as well as the timeframe
and number of burden hours used. The
number of hours used will not exceed
the number set aside for this purpose.
This research program will be used by
the Census Bureau and survey sponsors
to improve questionnaires and
procedures, reduce respondent burden,
and ultimately increase the quality of
data collected in the Census Bureau
censuses and surveys. The clearance
will be used to conduct pretesting of
decennial, demographic, and economic
census and survey questionnaires prior
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
16737
to fielding them. Pretesting activities
will involve one of the following
methods of identifying measurement
problems with the questionnaire or
survey procedure: Cognitive interviews,
focus groups, respondent debriefing,
behavior coding of respondent/
interviewer interaction, and split panel
tests.
II. Method of Collection
Any of the following methods may be
used: Mail, telephone, face-to-face,
paper-and-pencil, CATI, CAPI, Internet,
or IVR.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0607–0725.
Form Number: Various.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households, Farms, Business or other
for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
16,500.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 16,500.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is
no cost to respondent, except for their
time to complete the questionnaire.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: 13 U.S.C. 131, 141,
142, 161, 181, 182, 193, and 301.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including house and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: March 30, 2010.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–7448 Filed 4–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 63 (Friday, April 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16735-16737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7437]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[09-BIS-005]
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Bob Rahimzadeh
In the Matter of: Bob Rahimzadeh, 116 Hopper Lane, Folsom, CA
95630, Respondent; Order Relating to Bob Rahimzadeh.
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS''), initiated this administrative proceeding against Bob
Rahimzadeh (``Rahimzadeh'') pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export
Administration Regulations (the ``Regulations'') \1\, and Section 13(c)
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (the ``Act'') \2\,
through the issuance and filing of a charging letter as to Rahimzadeh
that alleges that Rahimzadeh has committed four violations of the
Regulations (``Charging Letter''). Specifically, these charges are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2009). The violations
occurred in 2004 and 2005. The Regulations governing the violation
at issue are found in the 2004 and 2005 versions of the Code of
Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774 (2004-2005)). The 2009
Regulations establish the procedures that apply to this matter.
\2\ 50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec. 2401-2420 (2000). Since August 21,
2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. p. 783 (2002)),
which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most
recent being that of August 13, 2009 (74 FR 41325 (Aug. 14, 2009))
has continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.) (``IEEPA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(b)--Causing, Aiding or Abetting
Between on or about July 26, 2004, and on or about September 28,
2004, Rahimzadeh caused, aided or abetted the doing of an act
prohibited by the Regulations by facilitating or coordinating the
export of approximately 174 rolls of hog hair filter media, part number
HH60130 and valued at approximately $11,687.76, items which are subject
to the Regulations and designated as EAR99 items,\3\ through the United
Arab Emirates (``U.A.E.'') to Iran without the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section 560.204 of the Iranian Transactions
Regulations (``ITR'') \4\ maintained by the U.S. Department of the
Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC''), an export to a
third country intended for transshipment to Iran is a transaction that
requires OFAC authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, no person may engage in the exportation of an item subject
to both the Regulations and the ITR without authorization from OFAC. No
OFAC authorization was sought or obtained for the transaction described
herein. Rahimzadeh took this action after having been asked by Parto
Abgardan Cooling Towers Co. (``Parto Abgardan''), an Iranian company,
to arrange for the export of the items to Iran ``via Dubai.'' Parto
Abgardan did not have a location in the U.A.E., and the address to
which Rahimzadeh arranged for the items to be exported, ``do Parto
Abgardan,'' was in fact subsequently added to the BIS Unverified List
of entities involved in transactions in which BIS is unable to verify
the existence or authenticity of the end-user or other party to the
transaction, published in the Federal Register on October 19, 2006. 71
FR 61706 (Oct. 19, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EAR99 is a designation for items subject to the Regulations
but not listed on the Commerce Control List. 15 CFR 734.3(c).
\4\ 31 CFR part 560.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed one violation of Section 764.2(b)
of the Regulations.
Charge 2 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting With Knowledge of a Violation
Between on or about July 26, 2004, and on or about September 28,
2004, Rahimzadeh ordered or financed items to be exported from the
United States with knowledge that a violation of the Regulations was
occurring, was about to occur or was intended to occur in connection
with the items. Specifically, between on or about July 26, 2004, and on
or about September 28, 2004, Rahimzadeh ordered or financed
approximately 174 rolls of hog hair filter media, part number HH60130
and valued at approximately $11,687.76, items which are subject to the
Regulations and designated as EAR99, which Rahimzadeh knew would be
exported to Iran via the U.A.E. without the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Section 560.204 of the ITR, an export to a
third country intended for transshipment to Iran is a transaction that
requires OFAC authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, no person may engage in the exportation of an item subject
to both the Regulations and the ITR without authorization from OFAC.
Rahimzadeh knew that no OFAC authorization was sought or obtained for
the transaction described herein.
Rahimzadeh had knowledge that a violation was occurring, was about
to occur or was intended to occur in connection with the items because
he was aware of the U.S. embargo of Iran and had knowledge that
exporting items through the U.A.E. to Iran was a violation of U.S. law.
Rahimzadeh stated to a BIS Office of Export Enforcement special agent
in an interview on or about October 14, 2005, that approximately three
years earlier he had become aware of sanctions barring the shipment of
items to Iran and that he understood that knowingly shipping items to
Iran through a third country was illegal. Rahimzadeh referred to this
type of activity as ``diverting'' items to Iran. Moreover, on or about
September 23, 1997, Rahimzadeh had issued a letter to Parto Abgardan
stating, ``I am trying to find a way to send the components that I
promised to you. Unfortunately after many unsuccessful attempts, I came
to a conclusion that the only way to open this channel is what you were
thinking, and if I understood
[[Page 16736]]
correctly, you are going to have some kind of agent or office in one of
the Gulf countries. I tell you this that I would have no problem
getting a container to my place and loading to a steam ship toward
Dubai. * * * Many shipping companies express that you shouldn't have
any major problem getting the goods to Tehran from Dubai.''
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed one violation of Section 764.2(e)
of the Regulations.
Charge 3 15 CFR 764.2(b)--Causing, Aiding or Abetting
Between on or about February 9, 2005, and on or about April 19,
2005, Rahimzadeh caused, aided, or abetted the doing of an act
prohibited by the Regulations by facilitating or coordinating the
export of approximately 185 rolls of hog hair filter media, part number
HHB60130 and valued at approximately $9,838.30, items which are subject
to the Regulations and designated as EAR99 items, through the U.A.E. to
Iran without the required U.S. Government authorization. Pursuant to
Section 560.204 of the ITR maintained by OFAC, an export to a third
country intended for transshipment to Iran is a transaction that
requires OFAC authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the
Regulations, no person may engage in the exportation of an item subject
to both the Regulations and the ITR without authorization from OFAC. No
OFAC authorization was sought or obtained for the transaction described
herein.
Specifically, after exporting certain hog hair filter media to
Parto Abgardan in Iran, as described in Charges 1-2, Rahimzadeh was
informed by Parto Abgardan that the items were not exactly the same as
a sample Rahimzadeh had previously brought to Parto Abgardan before the
transaction described in Charges 1-2 occurred. Rahimzadeh received from
Parto Abgardan a piece of the original sample as well as a piece of the
items described in Charges 1-2. Rahimzadeh then provided both pieces to
the U.S. distributor, and placed a new order for 185 rolls of hog hair
filter media, part number HHB60130, with the U.S. distributor.
Rahimzadeh arranged for the U.S. distributor to supply the items, which
were destined for Iran, to a freight forwarder for initial shipment to
the U.A.E., ``c/o Parto Abgardan.'' Parto Abgardan did not have a
location in the U.A.E., and the address to which Rahimzadeh arranged
for the items to be exported, ``c/o Parto Abgardan,'' was in fact added
to the BIS Unverified List of entities involved in transactions in
which BIS is unable to verify the existence or authenticity of the end-
user or other party to the transaction, published in the Federal
Register on October 19, 2006. 71 FR 61706 (Oct. 19, 2006).
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed one violation of Section 764.2(b)
of the Regulations.
Charge 4 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting With Knowledge of a Violation
Between on or about February 9, 2005, and on or about April 19,
2005, Rahimzadeh ordered items to be exported from the United States
with knowledge that a violation of the Regulations was occurring, was
about to occur or was intended to occur in connection with the items.
Specifically, between on or about February 9, 2005, and on or about
April 19, 2005, Rahimzadeh ordered approximately 185 rolls of hog hair
filter media, part number HHB60130 and valued at approximately
$9,838.30, items which are subject to the Regulations and designated as
EAR99, which Rahimzadeh knew would be exported to Iran via the U.A.E.
without the required U.S. Government authorization. Pursuant to Section
560.204 of the ITR, an export to a third country intended for
transshipment to Iran is a transaction that requires OFAC
authorization. Pursuant to Section 746.7 of the Regulations, no person
may engage in the exportation of an item subject to both the
Regulations and the ITR without authorization from OFAC. Rahimzadeh
knew that no OFAC authorization was sought or obtained for the
transaction described herein.
Rahimzadeh had knowledge that a violation was occurring, was about
to occur or was intended to occur in connection with the items because
Rahimzadeh was aware of the U.S. embargo of Iran and had knowledge that
exporting items through the U.A.E. to Iran was a violation of U.S. law.
Rahimzadeh stated to a BIS Office of Export Enforcement special agent
in an interview on or about October 14, 2005, that approximately three
years earlier he had become aware of sanctions barring the shipment of
items to Iran and that he understood that knowingly shipping items to
Iran through a third country was illegal. Rahimzadeh referred to this
type of activity as ``diverting'' items to Iran. Moreover, on or about
September 23, 1997, Rahimzadeh had issued a letter to Parto Abgardan
stating, ``I am trying to find a way to send the components that I
promised to you. Unfortunately after many unsuccessful attempts, I came
to a conclusion that the only way to open this channel is what you were
thinking, and if I understood correctly, you are going to have some
kind of agent or office in one of the Gulf countries. I tell you this
that I would have no problem getting a container to my place and
loading to a steam ship toward Dubai. * * * Many shipping companies
express that you shouldn't have any major problem getting the goods to
Tehran from Dubai.''
In so doing, Rahimzadeh committed one violation of Section 764.2(e)
of the Regulations.
Whereas, BIS and Rahimzadeh have entered into a Settlement
Agreement pursuant to Section 766.18(b) of the Regulations, whereby
they agreed to settle this matter in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement;
it is therefore ordered:
First, Rahimzadeh shall be assessed a civil penalty in the amount
of $100,000, the payment of which shall be suspended for a period of
ten (10) years from the date of this Order, and thereafter shall be
waived, provided that during the period of suspension, Rahimzadeh has
committed no violation of the Act, or any regulation, order, or license
issued thereunder.
Second, that for a period of ten (10) years from the date of this
Order, Rahimzadeh, his representatives, assigns or agents (``Denied
Person'') may not participate, directly or indirectly, in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Third, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
[[Page 16737]]
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Fourth, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Rahimzadeh by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
Fifth, that the Charging Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this
Order shall be made available to the public.
Sixth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Issued this 25th day of March 2010.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010-7437 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M