Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.; Millstone Power Station, Unit Nos 1, 2, and 3; Exemption, 16517-16518 [2010-7386]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrea D. Valentin,
Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch,
Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–7390 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–440; NRC–2010–0124]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company; Environmental Assessment
and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact;
Correction.
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
notice appearing in the Federal Register
on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 14638), which
incorrectly stated a wrong county for
Perry Nuclear Plant. This action is
necessary to correct the county for
Perry.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Mahoney, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone (301) 415–
3867, e-mail michael.mahoney@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page
14638, in the 1st column under Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, 20th line, it is
corrected to read from ‘‘Ottawa County,
Ohio’’ to ‘‘Lake County, Ohio.’’
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 26th
day of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael Mahoney,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III–
2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7331 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–245, 50–336, and 50–423;
NRC–2010–0128]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.;
Millstone Power Station, Unit Nos 1, 2,
and 3; Exemption
1.0 Background
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.
(DNC or the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–21,
DPR–65, and NPF–49, which authorize
operation of the Millstone Power
Station, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
(Millstone). The licenses provide,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of one boiling
water reactor and two pressurized water
reactors located in New London County,
Connecticut. The boiling water reactor
is permanently shut down.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
27, 2009 (74 FR 13926), requires
licensees to protect, with high
assurance, against radiological sabotage
by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security plans. The
final rule became effective on May 26,
2009, and compliance with the final
rule is required by March 31, 2010.
The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
published on March 27, 2009, establish
and update generically applicable
security requirements similar to those
previously imposed by Commission
orders issued after the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, and
implemented by licensees. In addition,
the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
include additional requirements to
further enhance site security based upon
insights gained from implementation of
the post-September 11, 2001, security
orders. It is from two of these new
requirements that DNC now seeks an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical
security requirements established by
this recent rulemaking have already
been or will be implemented by the
licensee by March 31, 2010.
Specifically, by letter dated January 12,
2010 (Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML100131116), as
supplemented by letter dated January
12, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML100131115), DNC requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions.’’ Due to
procurement needs and installation
activities associated with the required
security system upgrades, the licensee
has requested exemption from the
March 31, 2010, implementation date
specified in the new rule for two
specific requirements. The two items
subject to the request for exemption are
proposed to be implemented by August
31, 2010, and September 30, 2010,
respectively. The January 12, 2010,
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16517
letter, contains four attachments that
were designated by the licensee as
containing safeguards information and,
accordingly, the attachments are not
available to the public. The
supplemental January 12, 2010, letter
contains, as an attachment, an
environmental assessment.
Being granted this exemption for the
two items would allow the licensee
sufficient time to complete the upgrades
to the Millstone security system as
required by the recent revisions to 10
CFR 73.55.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
NRC approval of this exemption
request would, as noted above, allow an
extension from March 31, 2010, until
August 31, 2010, for certain
uninterruptible power requirements and
September 30, 2010, for certain alarm
station requirements. As stated above,
10 CFR 73.5 allows the NRC to grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 73. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the
licensee’s proposed exemption would
not result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
NRC approval of the licensees
exemption request is authorized by law.
In the draft final rule sent to the
Commission on July 9, 2008 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML081780209), the NRC
staff proposed that the requirements of
the new regulation be met within 180
days. The Commission directed a
change from 180 days to approximately
1 year for licensees to fully implement
the new requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From
this, it is clear that the Commission
wanted to provide a reasonable
timeframe for licensees to reach full
compliance.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16518
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a request to generically extend
the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009 letter from R.
W. Borchardt, NRC, to M. S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute, ADAMS
Accession No. ML091410309). The
licensee’s request for an exemption is
therefore consistent with the approach
set forth by the Commission and
discussed in the June 4, 2009, letter.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Millstone Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information regarding the proposed
exemption in the attachments to its
letter dated January 12, 2010. The
attachments describe a comprehensive
plan to upgrade the Millstone security
system to meet the new requirements in
10 CFR Part 73. Due to the procurement
needs and installation activities
associated with the required security
system upgrades, the licensee has
requested an exemption from the March
31, 2010, implementation date specified
in the new rule for two specific
requirements. DNC proposes to
implement certain alarm station
requirements by September 30, 2010,
and certain uninterruptible power
supply requirements by August 31,
2010.
The attachments to the licensee’s
letter dated January 12, 2010, details the
specific portions of the regulations for
which the site cannot be in compliance
by the March 31, 2010, implementation
date, along with justifications for each
of the proposals. The attachments also
provide a milestone schedule with the
activities necessary to bring the licensee
into full compliance by September 30,
2010.
Notwithstanding the schedule
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee would
continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRCapproved physical security program. By
September 30, 2010, Millstone would be
in full compliance with all the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
regulatory requirements of 10 CFR
73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee’s
submittals and concludes that the
licensee has justified its request for an
extension of the compliance date to
August 31, 2010, and September 30,
2010, with regard to the two specified
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ exemption
from the March 31, 2010, compliance
date is authorized by law and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and is otherwise
in the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The NRC has determined that the
long-term benefits that will be realized
when the security upgrades are
completed justifies extending the March
31, 2010, full compliance date for the
two items in the licensee’s exemption
request. The security measures that DNC
needs additional time to implement at
Millstone are new requirements
imposed by March 27, 2009,
amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are
in addition to those required by the
security orders issued in response to the
events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
the licensee’s actions are in the best
interest of protecting the public health
and safety through the security changes
that will result from granting this
exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption to the March 31, 2010,
deadline for the two items specified in
the attachments to DNC’s letter dated
January 12, 2010, the licensee is
required to be in full compliance with
10 CFR 73.55 by September 30, 2010. In
achieving compliance, the licensee is
reminded that it is responsible for
determining the appropriate licensing
mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10
CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all
necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 14634;
dated March 26, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of March 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7386 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–302, NRC–2010–0105]
Florida Power Corporation, et al.;
Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear
Generating Plant; Exemption
1.0
Background
Florida Power Corporation (FPC, the
licensee) is the holder of Facility
Operating License No. DPR–72 that
authorizes operation of the Crystal River
Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR–3).
The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of one
pressurized water reactor located in
Citrus County, Florida.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published as a
final rule in the Federal Register on
March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926–13993),
effective May 26, 2009, with a full
implementation date of March 31, 2010,
requires licensees to protect, with high
assurance, against radiological sabotage
by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security plans. The
amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 published
on March 27, 2009, establish and update
generically applicable security
requirements similar to those previously
imposed by Commission orders issued
after the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001, and implemented by licensees.
In addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post-September
11, 2001, security orders. It is from four
of these new requirements that CR–3
now seeks an exemption from the March
31, 2010, implementation date. All other
physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already been or will be
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16517-16518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7386]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-245, 50-336, and 50-423; NRC-2010-0128]
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.; Millstone Power Station, Unit
Nos 1, 2, and 3; Exemption
1.0 Background
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC or the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-21, DPR-65, and NPF-49,
which authorize operation of the Millstone Power Station, Unit Nos. 1,
2, and 3 (Millstone). The licenses provide, among other things, that
the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or
hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of one boiling water reactor and two
pressurized water reactors located in New London County, Connecticut.
The boiling water reactor is permanently shut down.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' section 73.55,
``Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in
nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage,'' published March
27, 2009 (74 FR 13926), requires licensees to protect, with high
assurance, against radiological sabotage by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security plans. The final rule became effective on
May 26, 2009, and compliance with the final rule is required by March
31, 2010.
The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27, 2009,
establish and update generically applicable security requirements
similar to those previously imposed by Commission orders issued after
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and implemented by
licensees. In addition, the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 include
additional requirements to further enhance site security based upon
insights gained from implementation of the post-September 11, 2001,
security orders. It is from two of these new requirements that DNC now
seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation date. All
other physical security requirements established by this recent
rulemaking have already been or will be implemented by the licensee by
March 31, 2010. Specifically, by letter dated January 12, 2010
(Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession
No. ML100131116), as supplemented by letter dated January 12, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML100131115), DNC requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.'' Due to
procurement needs and installation activities associated with the
required security system upgrades, the licensee has requested exemption
from the March 31, 2010, implementation date specified in the new rule
for two specific requirements. The two items subject to the request for
exemption are proposed to be implemented by August 31, 2010, and
September 30, 2010, respectively. The January 12, 2010, letter,
contains four attachments that were designated by the licensee as
containing safeguards information and, accordingly, the attachments are
not available to the public. The supplemental January 12, 2010, letter
contains, as an attachment, an environmental assessment.
Being granted this exemption for the two items would allow the
licensee sufficient time to complete the upgrades to the Millstone
security system as required by the recent revisions to 10 CFR 73.55.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ``By March 31, 2010, each nuclear
power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR part 50, shall implement
the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards
Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as `security plans.' '' Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part
73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
NRC approval of this exemption request would, as noted above, allow
an extension from March 31, 2010, until August 31, 2010, for certain
uninterruptible power requirements and September 30, 2010, for certain
alarm station requirements. As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5 allows the NRC
to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 73. The NRC
staff has determined that granting of the licensee's proposed exemption
would not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore, NRC approval of
the licensees exemption request is authorized by law.
In the draft final rule sent to the Commission on July 9, 2008
(ADAMS Accession No. ML081780209), the NRC staff proposed that the
requirements of the new regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180 days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From this, it is clear that the
Commission wanted to provide a reasonable timeframe for licensees to
reach full compliance.
[[Page 16518]]
As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct site-specific analyses to determine
what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and
that changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing
mechanisms, including exemptions. Since issuance of the final rule, the
Commission has rejected a request to generically extend the rule's
compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that
the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance
date (Reference: June 4, 2009 letter from R. W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.
S. Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute, ADAMS Accession No. ML091410309).
The licensee's request for an exemption is therefore consistent with
the approach set forth by the Commission and discussed in the June 4,
2009, letter.
Millstone Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed information regarding the proposed
exemption in the attachments to its letter dated January 12, 2010. The
attachments describe a comprehensive plan to upgrade the Millstone
security system to meet the new requirements in 10 CFR Part 73. Due to
the procurement needs and installation activities associated with the
required security system upgrades, the licensee has requested an
exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation date specified in the
new rule for two specific requirements. DNC proposes to implement
certain alarm station requirements by September 30, 2010, and certain
uninterruptible power supply requirements by August 31, 2010.
The attachments to the licensee's letter dated January 12, 2010,
details the specific portions of the regulations for which the site
cannot be in compliance by the March 31, 2010, implementation date,
along with justifications for each of the proposals. The attachments
also provide a milestone schedule with the activities necessary to
bring the licensee into full compliance by September 30, 2010.
Notwithstanding the schedule exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee would continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC-approved physical security
program. By September 30, 2010, Millstone would be in full compliance
with all the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on
March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and concludes that
the licensee has justified its request for an extension of the
compliance date to August 31, 2010, and September 30, 2010, with regard
to the two specified requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The NRC has determined that the long-term benefits that will be
realized when the security upgrades are completed justifies extending
the March 31, 2010, full compliance date for the two items in the
licensee's exemption request. The security measures that DNC needs
additional time to implement at Millstone are new requirements imposed
by March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are in addition to
those required by the security orders issued in response to the events
of September 11, 2001. Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the
licensee's actions are in the best interest of protecting the public
health and safety through the security changes that will result from
granting this exemption.
As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to
grant an exemption to the March 31, 2010, deadline for the two items
specified in the attachments to DNC's letter dated January 12, 2010,
the licensee is required to be in full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55 by
September 30, 2010. In achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded
that it is responsible for determining the appropriate licensing
mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for incorporation of
all necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact,'' the
Commission has previously determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 14634; dated March 26, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-7386 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P