Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Exemption, 16521-16523 [2010-7379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a generic industry request to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R.
W. Borchardt, NRC, to M. S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee’s
request for an exemption is, therefore,
consistent with the approach set forth
by the Commission and discussed in the
June 4, 2009, letter.
JAFNPP Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information in letter dated January 21,
2010, requesting an exemption, as
supplemented by letters dated February
25 and March 2, 2010. In its
submissions, JAFNPP described a
comprehensive plan including the scope
of work such as the design,
procurement, and installation activities,
consideration of impediments to
construction such as winter weather
conditions and equipment delivery
schedules, and provides a timeline for
achieving full compliance with the new
regulation. The licensee’s submissions
contain (1) sensitive security
information regarding the site security
plan, (2) details of specific portions of
the regulation for which the site cannot
be in compliance by the March 31, 2010,
deadline and the reasons for the same,
(3) the required changes to the site’s
security configuration, and (4) a
timeline with critical path activities that
will bring the licensee into full
compliance by December 31, 2010. The
timeline provides dates indicating when
(1) construction will begin on various
phases of the project (i.e., new roads,
buildings, and fences), (2) outages are
scheduled for each unit, and (3) critical
equipment will be ordered, installed,
tested and become operational.
Notwithstanding the schedule
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee stated that it
will continue to be in compliance with
all other applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRCapproved physical security program. By
December 31, 2010, JAFNPP will be in
full compliance with all the regulatory
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued
on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee’s
submittals and concludes that the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
licensee has provided adequate
justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to
December 31, 2010, with regard to four
specified requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property or
the common defense and security, and
is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants the requested exemption.
The NRC staff has determined that the
long-term benefits that will be realized
when the design, procurement, and
installation activities described in the
licensee’s submissions, are complete,
justifies extending the full compliance
date in the case of this particular
licensee. The security measures for
which JAFNPP needs additional time to
implement, are new requirements
imposed by March 27, 2009,
amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are
in addition to those required by the
security orders issued in response to the
events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
licensee’s actions are in the best interest
of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that
will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
deadline for the four items specified in
the licensee’s letter dated January 21,
2010, as supplemented by letters dated
February 25 and March 2, 2010, the
licensee is required to be in full
compliance by December 31, 2010. In
achieving full compliance, the licensee
is reminded that it is responsible for
determining the appropriate licensing
mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10
CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all
necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 14637;
dated March 26, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7387 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16521
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–280 and 50–281; NRC–
2010–0079]
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and
2; Exemption
1.0
Background
The Virginia Electric and Power
Company, (the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–32
and DPR–37, which authorize operation
of the Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1
and 2 (Surry). The licenses provide,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of two
pressurized-water reactors located in
Surry, Virginia.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), Part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with
a full implementation date of March 31,
2010, requires licensees to protect, with
high assurance, against radiological
sabotage by designing and
implementing comprehensive site
security programs. The amendments to
10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
and implemented by licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post-September
11, 2001, security orders. It is from
certain new requirements that Surry
now seeks an exemption from the March
31, 2010, implementation date. All other
physical scrutiny requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already or will be implemented by
the licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated December 7, 2009, the
licensee requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
exemptions.’’ Certain portions of the
licensee’s December 7, 2009, letter
contain safeguards information and,
accordingly, are not available to the
public. The licensee has requested an
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16522
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date stating that it must
perform the upgrades to portions of the
Surry security system before all of the
Section 73.55 requirements can be met.
Specifically, the request is to extend the
compliance date for certain
requirements from the current March
31, 2010, deadline to August 31, 2010,
and August 31, 2011, for Units 1 and 2,
respectively. Being granted this
exemption for this item would allow the
licensee to complete the modifications
designed to update equipment and
incorporate state-of-the-art technology
to meet the noted regulatory
requirement.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
Part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR Part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
NRC approval of this exemption, as
noted above, would allow an extension
from March 31, 2010, until August 31,
2010, and August 31, 2011, for Units 1
and 2, respectively, for the
implementation date for certain
requirements of the new rule. The NRC
staff has determined that granting of the
licensee’s proposed exemption would
not result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor
security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed
that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180
days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new
requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From
this, it is clear that the Commission
wanted to provide a reasonable
timeframe for licensees to achieve full
compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that these
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a generic industry request to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from
R.W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee’s
request for an exemption is therefore
consistent with the approach set forth
by the Commission and discussed in the
June 4, 2009, letter.
Surry Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information in its December 7, 2009,
letter requesting an exemption. It
describes a comprehensive plan for
implementing certain requirements in
the new Part 73 rule and provides a
timeline for achieving full compliance
with the new regulation. The December
7, 2009, submittal contains safeguards
information regarding the site security
plan, details of specific portions of the
regulation for which the site cannot be
in compliance by the March 31, 2010,
deadline and why, the required changes
to the site’s security configuration, and
a timeline with critical path activities
that would allow the licensee to achieve
full compliance by August 31, 2010, and
August 31, 2011, for Units 1 and 2,
respectively. The timeline provides
dates indicating when (1) construction
will begin on various phases of the
project, (2) outages are scheduled for
each unit, and (3) critical equipment
will be ordered, installed, tested and
become operational. Notwithstanding
the schedule exemptions for these
limited requirements, the licensee will
continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRCapproved physical security program. By
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2011,
for Units 1 and 2, respectively, Surry
will be in full compliance with all the
regulatory requirements of 10 CFR
73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff reviewed the licensee’s
submittal and concludes that the
licensee has provided adequate
justification for its request for an
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
extension of the compliance date to
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2011,
for Units 1 and 2, respectively, with
regard to certain requirements of 10 CFR
73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property or
the common defense and security, and
is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants the requested exemption.
The long-term benefits that will be
realized when the security system
upgrades are complete justifies
exceeding the full compliance date in
the case of this particular licensee. The
security measures Surry needs
additional time to implement are new
requirements imposed by March 27,
2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and
are in addition to those required by the
security orders issued in response to the
events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, it is concluded that the
licensee’s actions are in the best interest
of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that
will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation deadline for the item
specified in the licensee’s December 7,
2009, letter, the licensee is required to
be in full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55
by August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively. In
achieving compliance, the licensee is
reminded that it is responsible for
determining the appropriate licensing
mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10
CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all
necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 9618)
published March 3, 2010, as corrected
in the Federal Register on March 19,
2010 (75 FR 13318) by letter dated
March 12, 2010 (Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System Accession No. ML100600405).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day
of March 2010.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7379 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–346; NRC–2010–0125]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company; Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station; Exemption
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
1.0 Background
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company (FENOC, the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License No.
NFP–3, which authorizes operation of
the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,
Unit 1 (DBNPS). The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of one
pressurized-water reactor located in
Ottawa County, Ohio.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with
a full implementation date of March 31,
2010, requires licensees to protect, with
high assurance, against radiological
sabotage by designing and
implementing comprehensive site
security programs. The amendments to
10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
and implemented by licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post-September
11, 2001 security orders. It is from one
of these new requirements that DBNPS
now seeks an exemption from the March
31, 2010, implementation date. All other
physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March
31, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
By letter dated November 30, 2009, as
supplemented by letter dated December
23, 2009, the licensee requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions.’’ The
licensee’s November 30, 2009, letter
contains proprietary and safeguards
information and, accordingly, is not
available to the public. The licensee has
requested an exemption from the March
31, 2010, compliance date stating that it
must complete a significant
modification to the current site security
configuration before all requirements
can be met. Specifically, the request is
for one specific requirement from the
current March 31, 2010, deadline, to
February 3, 2011. Being granted this
exemption for the one item would allow
the licensee to complete the
modification and incorporate state-ofthe-art technology to meet or exceed
regulatory requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
The approval of this exemption, as
noted above, would allow an extension
from March 31, 2010, until February 03,
2011, for one specified area of the new
rule. As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5
allows the NRC to grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part
73. The NRC staff has determined that
granting of the licensee’s proposed
exemption would not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the Commission’s
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is
authorized by law.
In the draft final rule Power Reactor
Security provided to the Commission,
the NRC staff proposed that the
requirements of the new regulation be
met within 180 days. The Commission
directed a change from 180 days to
approximately 1 year for licensees to
fully implement the new requirements.
This change was incorporated into the
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16523
final rule. From this, it is clear that the
Commission wanted to provide a
reasonable timeframe for licensees to
achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a generic industry request to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from
R.W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee’s
request for an exemption is therefore
consistent with the approach set forth
by the Commission and discussed in the
June 4, 2009, letter.
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information in the enclosure of its
November 30, 2009, letter requesting an
exemption. Enclosure 1 contains
proprietary information (not publically
available, contains security-related
information) regarding the site security
plan, details of specific portions of the
regulation for which the site cannot be
in compliance by the March 31, 2010,
deadline and why, the required changes
to the site’s security configuration, and
a timeline with critical path activities
that would ensure the licensee to
achieve full compliance by February 3,
2011. The timeline provides dates
indicating when (1) Construction will
begin on various phases of the project,
(2) outages are scheduled for the unit,
and (3) critical equipment will be
ordered, installed, tested and become
operational.
Notwithstanding the schedule
exemption for this specific requirement,
the licensee will continue to be in
compliance with all other applicable
physical security requirements as
described in 10 CFR 73.55 and reflected
in its current NRC-approved physical
security program. By February 3, 2011
DBNPS will be in full compliance with
all the regulatory requirements of 10
CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee’s
submittals and concludes that the
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16521-16523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281; NRC-2010-0079]
Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Power Station, Unit
Nos. 1 and 2; Exemption
1.0 Background
The Virginia Electric and Power Company, (the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37, which
authorize operation of the Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
(Surry). The licenses provide, among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of two pressurized-water reactors located in
Surry, Virginia.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' Section 73.55,
``Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in
nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage,'' published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with a full implementation date of
March 31, 2010, requires licensees to protect, with high assurance,
against radiological sabotage by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security programs. The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
published on March 27, 2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, and implemented by licensees. In addition, the amendments to 10
CFR 73.55 include additional requirements to further enhance site
security based upon insights gained from implementation of the post-
September 11, 2001, security orders. It is from certain new
requirements that Surry now seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical scrutiny requirements
established by this recent rulemaking have already or will be
implemented by the licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated December 7, 2009, the licensee requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.''
Certain portions of the licensee's December 7, 2009, letter contain
safeguards information and, accordingly, are not available to the
public. The licensee has requested an
[[Page 16522]]
exemption from the March 31, 2010, compliance date stating that it must
perform the upgrades to portions of the Surry security system before
all of the Section 73.55 requirements can be met. Specifically, the
request is to extend the compliance date for certain requirements from
the current March 31, 2010, deadline to August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively. Being granted this exemption for
this item would allow the licensee to complete the modifications
designed to update equipment and incorporate state-of-the-art
technology to meet the noted regulatory requirement.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ``By March 31, 2010, each nuclear
power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR Part 50, shall implement
the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards
Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as `security plans.' '' Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part
73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
NRC approval of this exemption, as noted above, would allow an
extension from March 31, 2010, until August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively, for the implementation date for
certain requirements of the new rule. The NRC staff has determined that
granting of the licensee's proposed exemption would not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the
Commission's regulations. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by
law.
In the draft final power reactor security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The Commission directed a change
from 180 days to approximately 1 year for licensees to fully implement
the new requirements. This change was incorporated into the final rule.
From this, it is clear that the Commission wanted to provide a
reasonable timeframe for licensees to achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct site-specific analyses to determine
what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and
that these changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing
mechanisms, including exemptions. Since issuance of the final rule, the
Commission has rejected a generic industry request to extend the rule's
compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that
the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance
date (Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R.W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S.
Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee's request for an
exemption is therefore consistent with the approach set forth by the
Commission and discussed in the June 4, 2009, letter.
Surry Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed information in its December 7, 2009,
letter requesting an exemption. It describes a comprehensive plan for
implementing certain requirements in the new Part 73 rule and provides
a timeline for achieving full compliance with the new regulation. The
December 7, 2009, submittal contains safeguards information regarding
the site security plan, details of specific portions of the regulation
for which the site cannot be in compliance by the March 31, 2010,
deadline and why, the required changes to the site's security
configuration, and a timeline with critical path activities that would
allow the licensee to achieve full compliance by August 31, 2010, and
August 31, 2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The timeline provides
dates indicating when (1) construction will begin on various phases of
the project, (2) outages are scheduled for each unit, and (3) critical
equipment will be ordered, installed, tested and become operational.
Notwithstanding the schedule exemptions for these limited requirements,
the licensee will continue to be in compliance with all other
applicable physical security requirements as described in 10 CFR 73.55
and reflected in its current NRC-approved physical security program. By
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively,
Surry will be in full compliance with all the regulatory requirements
of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request
The staff reviewed the licensee's submittal and concludes that the
licensee has provided adequate justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to August 31, 2010, and August 31,
2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively, with regard to certain
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The long-term benefits that will be realized when the security
system upgrades are complete justifies exceeding the full compliance
date in the case of this particular licensee. The security measures
Surry needs additional time to implement are new requirements imposed
by March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are in addition to
those required by the security orders issued in response to the events
of September 11, 2001. Therefore, it is concluded that the licensee's
actions are in the best interest of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that will result from granting this
exemption.
As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to
grant an exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation deadline for
the item specified in the licensee's December 7, 2009, letter, the
licensee is required to be in full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55 by
August 31, 2010, and August 31, 2011, for Units 1 and 2, respectively.
In achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded that it is
responsible for determining the appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e.,
10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all necessary
changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact,'' the
Commission has previously determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 9618) published March 3, 2010, as corrected in
the Federal Register on March 19, 2010 (75 FR 13318) by letter dated
March 12, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
Accession No. ML100600405).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of March 2010.
[[Page 16523]]
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-7379 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P