Beverages: Bottled Water; Reopening of the Comment Period, 16363-16365 [2010-7292]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this supplemental NPRM. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
Compliance
(h) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Inspection for Wear
(i) Within 900 cycles-in-service after the
effective date of this AD, perform an on-wing
or in-shop inspection of the fan blade and
damper for wear. Use paragraphs 3.A.(1)
through 3.A.(5) or paragraphs 3.B.(1) through
3.B.(5) respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International Service
Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–
1067, dated February 15, 2007.
(j) If you find out-of-limit wear on at least
one fan blade platform underside, perform
the additional inspections and disposition
the parts, as specified in paragraphs 3.A.(3)
and 3.A.(5) or paragraphs 3.B.(3) and 3.B.(5)
respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International SB No.
CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–1067, dated
February 15, 2007.
(k) Thereafter, within intervals not to
exceed 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection,
perform an on-wing or in-shop inspection for
wear. Use paragraphs 3.A.(1) through 3.A.(5)
or paragraphs 3.B.(1) through 3.B.(5)
respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International SB No.
CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–1067, dated
February 15, 2007.
(l) If you find wear on at least one fan blade
platform underside, perform additional
inspections and disposition the parts, as
specified in paragraphs 3.A.(3) and 3.A.(5) or
paragraphs 3.B.(3) and 3.B.(5) respectively, of
the Accomplishment Instructions of CFM
International SB No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B
72–1067, dated February 15, 2007.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
CFM International, S.A.: Docket No. FAA–
2009–0606; Directorate Identifier 2009–
NE–11–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by May
17, 2010.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to CFM International,
S.A. models CFM56–3 and –3B turbofan
engines with 25 degrees midspan shroud fan
blades, part numbers (P/Ns) 9527M99P08,
9527M99P09, 9527M99P10, 9527M99P11,
1285M39P01, or fan blade pairs, P/Ns 335–
088–901–0, 335–088–902–0, 335–088–903–0,
and 335–088–904–0 installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Boeing
737 series airplanes.
(d) CFM International, S.A. has added to
the basic engine model number on the engine
nameplate to identify minor variations in
engine configuration, installation
components, or reduced ratings peculiar to
aircraft installation requirements.
(e) Those engines marked on the engine
data plate as CFM56–3–B1 are included in
this AD as CFM56–3 turbofan engines.
(f) Those engines marked on the engine
data plate as CFM56–3B–2 are included in
this AD as CFM56–3B turbofan engines.
Unsafe Condition
(g) This AD results from a report of a failed
fan blade with severe out-of-limit wear on the
underside of the blade platform where it
contacts the damper. We are issuing this AD
to prevent failure of multiple fan blades,
which could result in an uncontained failure
of the engine and damage to the airplane.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
Installation Prohibition
(m) After the effective date of this AD,
don’t install any 25 degrees midspan shroud
fan blades, P/Ns 9527M99P08, 9527M99P09,
9527M99P10, 9527M99P11, 1285M39P01, or
fan blade pairs, P/Ns 335–088–901–0, 335–
088–902–0, 335–088–903–0, and 335–088–
904–0, unless they have passed an inspection
specified in paragraph 3. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM
International SB No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B
72–1067, dated February 15, 2007.
Optional Terminating Action
(n) Replacing the 25 degrees midspan
shroud fan blade set with a 37 degrees
midspan shroud fan blade set terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(o) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(p) Contact Antonio Cancelliere, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: antonio.cancelliere@faa.gov;
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16363
telephone (781) 238–7751; fax (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
(q) Contact CFM International, S.A.,
Technical Publication Department, 1
Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
telephone (513) 552–2800; fax (513) 552–
2816, for a copy of the service information
referenced in this AD.
(r) European Aviation Safety Agency AD
2009–0036, dated February 20, 2009, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 19, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–7343 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. FDA 1993–N–0259] (formerly
Docket No. 1993N–0085)
Beverages: Bottled Water; Reopening
of the Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the
comment period.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is reopening until
June 1, 2010 the comment period for the
proposed rule, published in the Federal
Register of August 4, 1993 (58 FR
41612), amending the quality standard
for bottled water (currently in 21 CFR
165.110(b)). In the 1993 proposed rule,
FDA proposed to revise the bottled
water quality standard to establish or
modify the allowable levels for 5
inorganic chemicals and 18 synthetic
organic chemicals, and to maintain the
existing allowable level for the
inorganic chemical sulfate. In a final
rule published March 26, 1996 (61 FR
13258), FDA maintained the existing
allowable level for sulfate and adopted
the proposed allowable levels for the 5
inorganic chemicals and 17 of the
synthetic organic chemicals, but
deferred final action on the proposed
allowable level for the chemical di(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). FDA is
reopening the comment period on the
1993 proposed rule to seek further
comment on finalizing the allowable
level for DEHP in the bottled water
quality standard.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments by June 1, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
16364
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA 1993–N–
0259, by any of the following methods.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm.1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauren Posnick Robin, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–
317), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park,
MD 20740, 301–436–1639.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
I. Background
In the Federal Register of August 4,
1993 (58 FR 41612), FDA published a
proposal (‘‘the 1993 proposed rule’’) to
revise the bottled water standard of
quality regulations in 21 CFR part 103
(now 21 CFR 165.110(b)) to establish or
modify the allowable levels in bottled
water for 5 inorganic chemicals and 18
synthetic organic chemicals, and to
maintain the existing allowable level for
the inorganic chemical sulfate. FDA
proposed these revisions in response to
the publication by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) of a final rule
(57 FR 31776; July 17, 1992) that
established national primary drinking
water regulations consisting of
maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
for the same 23 chemicals and
establishing an MCL for sulfate in
public drinking water. In a final rule
published March 26, 1996 (61 FR
13258), FDA maintained its existing
allowable level for sulfate and adopted
the proposed allowable levels for the 5
inorganic chemicals and 17 of the
synthetic organic chemicals, but
deferred final action on the proposed
allowable level of 0.006 milligrams/liter
(mg/L) for the chemical di(2ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). FDA
deferred action on DEHP in response to
a comment stating that the proposed
allowable level conflicted with an
existing prior sanction for this substance
in § 181.27 (21 CFR 181.27). The
comment stated that DEHP is prior
sanctioned in § 181.27 for use as a
plasticizer when migrating from foodpackaging material into foods with high
water content and, as such, is approved
for use in contact with food in
§ 177.1210 (21 CFR 177.1210) Closures
with sealing gaskets for food containers.
The comment also stated that DEHP is
routinely used as a plasticizer in gaskets
used in metal and plastic closures for
the packaging of bottled water in accord
with this approval, and that such use
may result in levels of this chemical
migrating into water that exceed the
proposed allowable level. Thus, the
comment maintained that finalizing the
proposed allowable level for DEHP
would result in a limit on the level of
this chemical in bottled water that
conflicts with this chemical’s permitted
use under the existing food additive
regulation for closures with sealing
gaskets, and that taking such action
would effectively ban the use of this
plasticizer. The comment further stated
that gaskets containing DEHP are
permitted for use in packaging food and
bottled water under relevant European
national regulations.
In the 1996 final rule, FDA stated that
it was not aware of the potential conflict
between the proposed allowable level
for DEHP and the existing prior sanction
for this substance in § 181.27 at the time
it published the proposal. FDA also
stated that the agency needed additional
time to evaluate this matter and to
determine an appropriate course of
action with respect to the proposed
allowable level for DEHP and, therefore,
FDA was deferring final action on the
proposed allowable level for DEHP at
that time.
II. Request for Comments
FDA is now considering finalizing the
allowable level of 0.006 mg/L for DEHP
in the quality standard for bottled water
in § 165.110(b). Because of the length of
time that has elapsed since the 1993
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule, FDA is seeking
additional comments on establishing an
allowable level for DEHP. Comments
previously submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management on the issue of
establishing an allowable level for DEHP
do not need to be and should not be
resubmitted. All comments on DEHP
previously submitted to the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document, and
comments on DEHP submitted in
response to this reopening of the
comment period, will be considered in
any final rule finalizing the allowable
level for DEHP in the quality standard
for bottled water.
In this document, FDA is addressing
the issue of the prior sanction for the
use of DEHP under § 181.27, which
resulted in deferral of final action in
1996. FDA is also providing updates on
the use of DEHP in bottled water bottles
and lid gaskets, and on international
standards for DEHP in bottled water.
Finally, FDA is providing information
on analytical methods for measuring
DEHP that were adopted by EPA after
the 1993 proposed rule, and is seeking
comment on the possible inclusion of
these methods in the final regulation.
A. Prior Sanction for Use of DEHP
FDA has determined that the prior
sanction for the use of DEHP in
§ 181.27, which exempts the use listed
in § 181.27 from the food additive
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act), does not
preclude the agency from establishing
an allowable level for DEHP in the
standard of quality for bottled water
under § 165.110(b). The existence of a
prior sanction exempts ‘‘sanctioned uses
from the food additive provisions of the
[a]ct but not from the other adulteration
or the misbranding provisions of the
[a]ct.’’ 21 CFR 181.5(b). Therefore, while
a food product containing DEHP
consistent with its prior sanction could
not be considered adulterated within
the meaning of section 402(C)(i) of the
act, it could be considered adulterated
or misbranded under other adulteration
or the misbranding provisions of the act.
Under section 403(h)(1) of the act (21
U.S.C. 343(h)(1)), bottled water that is of
a quality below the prescribed standard
in § 165.110(b) is required by
§ 165.110(c) to be labeled with a
statement of substandard quality or it is
deemed misbranded. Thus, if an
allowable level for DEHP is finalized
under the quality standard for bottled
water, finished bottled water products
with DEHP levels above the finalized
level will be misbranded if the products
do not bear label statements of
substandard quality. FDA also notes that
under the adulteration provisions of the
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
act, bottled water containing DEHP at a
level considered injurious to health
under section 402(a)(1) of the act is
deemed to be adulterated.
B. Use of DEHP in Bottled Water
Bottles and Lid Gaskets
The comment on the 1993 proposal
stated that: (a) DEHP is routinely used
as a plasticizer in gaskets used in metal
and plastic closures for the packaging of
bottled water in accord with the prior
sanction, and that such use may result
in levels of DEHP migrating into water
that exceed the proposed allowable
level, and that (b) gaskets containing
DEHP are permitted for use in packaging
food and bottled water under relevant
European national regulations.
However, based on information from
industry, it appears that DEHP currently
is not used in caps or closures for
bottled water in the U.S (Ref. 1).
Furthermore, FDA notes that current
European Commission (EC) regulations
limit the use of DEHP as a plasticizer in
food contact materials to repeated use
materials (Ref. 2). DEHP use is not
permitted under EC regulations for
plastic caps or plastic lid gaskets in
metal caps.
C. International Standards for DEHP
in Bottled Water
FDA also notes that several
international organizations have
adopted standards for DEHP that are the
same or similar to FDA’s proposed
allowable level of 0.006 mg/L. The
International Bottled Water Association
(IBWA), a trade association representing
a large segment of the U.S. bottled water
industry, had adopted EPA’s 0.006 mg/
l standard for DEHP in its Model Code
by 1995, suggesting that U.S.
manufacturers already are able to meet
the proposed level (Refs. 3 and 4). In
addition, the World Health Organization
(WHO) has established a guideline value
for DEHP in drinking water of 0.008 mg/
L (Ref. 5). The Codex Alimentarius
General Standard for Bottled/Packaged
Drinking Waters (Other than Natural
Mineral Waters) requires that bottled/
packaged drinking waters comply with
WHO’s guideline values (Ref. 6).
D. Analytical Methodology
In the 1993 proposal, FDA proposed
adopting EPA Method 506 (Ref. 7) and
EPA Method 525.1, Revision 3.0, (Ref. 8)
for analysis of selected chemicals,
including DEHP (58 FR 41612). In the
1996 document, FDA adopted EPA
Methods 506 and 525.1, Rev. 3.0, for all
the chemicals with the exception of
DEHP (61 FR 13258). EPA has since
updated its methods for DEHP (Refs. 9
and 10). In this document, FDA is
making EPA’s updated methods for
DEHP analysis (Refs. 9 and 10) available
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
for comment on their possible inclusion
in the final regulation.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. References
FDA has placed the following
references on display in FDA’s Division
of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). You may see them between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday. (FDA has verified the Web site
addresses, but FDA is not responsible
for any subsequent changes to Web sites
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
1. John Rost, Crown Packaging Technology,
2010, personal communication, January 5,
2010.
2. European Commission, 2007,
Commission Directive 2007/19/EC of 30
March 2007 amending Directive 2002/72/EC
relating to plastic materials and articles
intended to come into contact with food and
Council Directive 85/572/EEC laying down
the list of simulants to be used for testing
migration of constituents of plastic materials
and articles intended to come into contact
with foodstuffs, Official Journal of the
European Union, 31.3.2007, L 91/17–36.
3. International Bottled Water Association,
2007, IBWA Model Code, Version October
2007, accessed online at https://
www.bottledwater.org/files/
IBWA%20Bottled%20Water%20Code%
20of%20Practice.pdf.
4. International Bottled Water Association,
2007, personal communication, August 30,
2007.
5. World Health Organization, 2008,
Guidelines for drinking-water quality, third
edition, incorporating first and second
addenda, World Health Organization:
Geneva, accessed online at https://
www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/
fulltext.pdf.
6. Codex Alimentarius, 2001, General
Standard for Bottled/Packaged Drinking
Waters (Other than Natural Mineral Waters),
CODEX STAN 227–2001, accessed online at
www.codexalimentarius.net/download/
standards/369/CXS_227e.pdf.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), EPA Method 506—‘‘Determination of
Phthalate and Adipate Esters in Drinking
Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction or LiquidSolid Extraction and Gas Chromatography
with Photoionization Detection, ’’ In
‘‘Methods for the Determination of Organic
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16365
Compounds in Drinking Water, Supplement
I,’’ July 1990.
8. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.1, Revision
2.2—‘‘Determination of Organic Compounds
in Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction
and Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry.’’ In ‘‘Methods for the
Determination of Organic Compounds in
Drinking Water, Supplement I,’’ May 1991,
accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/
waterscience/methods/method/files/
525_1.pdf
9. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 506, Rev. 1.1—
‘‘Determination of phthalate and adipate
esters in drinking water by liquid/liquid
extraction or liquid/solid extraction and gas
chromatography with photoionization
detection,’’ In ‘‘Analytical Methods Approved
for Drinking Water Compliance Monitoring of
Organic Contaminants,’’ June 2008, accessed
online at https://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/
methods/pdfs/methods/organic_080521b.pdf.
10. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.2, Rev.
2.0—‘‘Determination of organic compounds
in drinking water by liquid-solid extraction
and capillary column gas chromatography/
mass spectrometry, ’’ In ‘‘Analytical Methods
Approved for Drinking Water Compliance
Monitoring of Organic Contaminants,’’ June
2008, accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/
ogwdw000/methods/pdfs/methods/
organic_080521b.pdf.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–7292 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 814
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0458]
RIN 0910–AG29
Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of
Devices; Requirement for Submission
of Information on Pediatric
Subpopulations That Suffer From a
Disease or Condition That a Device Is
Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or Cure
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is proposing to
amend the regulations on premarket
approval of medical devices to include
requirements relating to the submission
of information on pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that a device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, we are publishing a
companion direct final rule. This
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16363-16365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7292]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. FDA 1993-N-0259] (formerly Docket No. 1993N-0085)
Beverages: Bottled Water; Reopening of the Comment Period
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening until June
1, 2010 the comment period for the proposed rule, published in the
Federal Register of August 4, 1993 (58 FR 41612), amending the quality
standard for bottled water (currently in 21 CFR 165.110(b)). In the
1993 proposed rule, FDA proposed to revise the bottled water quality
standard to establish or modify the allowable levels for 5 inorganic
chemicals and 18 synthetic organic chemicals, and to maintain the
existing allowable level for the inorganic chemical sulfate. In a final
rule published March 26, 1996 (61 FR 13258), FDA maintained the
existing allowable level for sulfate and adopted the proposed allowable
levels for the 5 inorganic chemicals and 17 of the synthetic organic
chemicals, but deferred final action on the proposed allowable level
for the chemical di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). FDA is reopening the
comment period on the 1993 proposed rule to seek further comment on
finalizing the allowable level for DEHP in the bottled water quality
standard.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by June 1, 2010.
[[Page 16364]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA 1993-
N-0259, by any of the following methods.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received may be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For additional information on submitting
comments, see the ``Comments'' heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm.1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren Posnick Robin, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-317), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-1639.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of August 4, 1993 (58 FR 41612), FDA
published a proposal (``the 1993 proposed rule'') to revise the bottled
water standard of quality regulations in 21 CFR part 103 (now 21 CFR
165.110(b)) to establish or modify the allowable levels in bottled
water for 5 inorganic chemicals and 18 synthetic organic chemicals, and
to maintain the existing allowable level for the inorganic chemical
sulfate. FDA proposed these revisions in response to the publication by
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of a final rule (57 FR 31776;
July 17, 1992) that established national primary drinking water
regulations consisting of maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for the
same 23 chemicals and establishing an MCL for sulfate in public
drinking water. In a final rule published March 26, 1996 (61 FR 13258),
FDA maintained its existing allowable level for sulfate and adopted the
proposed allowable levels for the 5 inorganic chemicals and 17 of the
synthetic organic chemicals, but deferred final action on the proposed
allowable level of 0.006 milligrams/liter (mg/L) for the chemical di(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). FDA deferred action on DEHP in response to
a comment stating that the proposed allowable level conflicted with an
existing prior sanction for this substance in Sec. 181.27 (21 CFR
181.27). The comment stated that DEHP is prior sanctioned in Sec.
181.27 for use as a plasticizer when migrating from food-packaging
material into foods with high water content and, as such, is approved
for use in contact with food in Sec. 177.1210 (21 CFR 177.1210)
Closures with sealing gaskets for food containers. The comment also
stated that DEHP is routinely used as a plasticizer in gaskets used in
metal and plastic closures for the packaging of bottled water in accord
with this approval, and that such use may result in levels of this
chemical migrating into water that exceed the proposed allowable level.
Thus, the comment maintained that finalizing the proposed allowable
level for DEHP would result in a limit on the level of this chemical in
bottled water that conflicts with this chemical's permitted use under
the existing food additive regulation for closures with sealing
gaskets, and that taking such action would effectively ban the use of
this plasticizer. The comment further stated that gaskets containing
DEHP are permitted for use in packaging food and bottled water under
relevant European national regulations.
In the 1996 final rule, FDA stated that it was not aware of the
potential conflict between the proposed allowable level for DEHP and
the existing prior sanction for this substance in Sec. 181.27 at the
time it published the proposal. FDA also stated that the agency needed
additional time to evaluate this matter and to determine an appropriate
course of action with respect to the proposed allowable level for DEHP
and, therefore, FDA was deferring final action on the proposed
allowable level for DEHP at that time.
II. Request for Comments
FDA is now considering finalizing the allowable level of 0.006 mg/L
for DEHP in the quality standard for bottled water in Sec. 165.110(b).
Because of the length of time that has elapsed since the 1993 proposed
rule, FDA is seeking additional comments on establishing an allowable
level for DEHP. Comments previously submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management on the issue of establishing an allowable level for
DEHP do not need to be and should not be resubmitted. All comments on
DEHP previously submitted to the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document, and comments on DEHP submitted in response to
this reopening of the comment period, will be considered in any final
rule finalizing the allowable level for DEHP in the quality standard
for bottled water.
In this document, FDA is addressing the issue of the prior sanction
for the use of DEHP under Sec. 181.27, which resulted in deferral of
final action in 1996. FDA is also providing updates on the use of DEHP
in bottled water bottles and lid gaskets, and on international
standards for DEHP in bottled water. Finally, FDA is providing
information on analytical methods for measuring DEHP that were adopted
by EPA after the 1993 proposed rule, and is seeking comment on the
possible inclusion of these methods in the final regulation.
A. Prior Sanction for Use of DEHP
FDA has determined that the prior sanction for the use of DEHP in
Sec. 181.27, which exempts the use listed in Sec. 181.27 from the
food additive provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the act), does not preclude the agency from establishing an allowable
level for DEHP in the standard of quality for bottled water under Sec.
165.110(b). The existence of a prior sanction exempts ``sanctioned uses
from the food additive provisions of the [a]ct but not from the other
adulteration or the misbranding provisions of the [a]ct.'' 21 CFR
181.5(b). Therefore, while a food product containing DEHP consistent
with its prior sanction could not be considered adulterated within the
meaning of section 402(C)(i) of the act, it could be considered
adulterated or misbranded under other adulteration or the misbranding
provisions of the act.
Under section 403(h)(1) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343(h)(1)), bottled
water that is of a quality below the prescribed standard in Sec.
165.110(b) is required by Sec. 165.110(c) to be labeled with a
statement of substandard quality or it is deemed misbranded. Thus, if
an allowable level for DEHP is finalized under the quality standard for
bottled water, finished bottled water products with DEHP levels above
the finalized level will be misbranded if the products do not bear
label statements of substandard quality. FDA also notes that under the
adulteration provisions of the
[[Page 16365]]
act, bottled water containing DEHP at a level considered injurious to
health under section 402(a)(1) of the act is deemed to be adulterated.
B. Use of DEHP in Bottled Water Bottles and Lid Gaskets
The comment on the 1993 proposal stated that: (a) DEHP is routinely
used as a plasticizer in gaskets used in metal and plastic closures for
the packaging of bottled water in accord with the prior sanction, and
that such use may result in levels of DEHP migrating into water that
exceed the proposed allowable level, and that (b) gaskets containing
DEHP are permitted for use in packaging food and bottled water under
relevant European national regulations. However, based on information
from industry, it appears that DEHP currently is not used in caps or
closures for bottled water in the U.S (Ref. 1). Furthermore, FDA notes
that current European Commission (EC) regulations limit the use of DEHP
as a plasticizer in food contact materials to repeated use materials
(Ref. 2). DEHP use is not permitted under EC regulations for plastic
caps or plastic lid gaskets in metal caps.
C. International Standards for DEHP in Bottled Water
FDA also notes that several international organizations have
adopted standards for DEHP that are the same or similar to FDA's
proposed allowable level of 0.006 mg/L. The International Bottled Water
Association (IBWA), a trade association representing a large segment of
the U.S. bottled water industry, had adopted EPA's 0.006 mg/l standard
for DEHP in its Model Code by 1995, suggesting that U.S. manufacturers
already are able to meet the proposed level (Refs. 3 and 4). In
addition, the World Health Organization (WHO) has established a
guideline value for DEHP in drinking water of 0.008 mg/L (Ref. 5). The
Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Bottled/Packaged Drinking
Waters (Other than Natural Mineral Waters) requires that bottled/
packaged drinking waters comply with WHO's guideline values (Ref. 6).
D. Analytical Methodology
In the 1993 proposal, FDA proposed adopting EPA Method 506 (Ref. 7)
and EPA Method 525.1, Revision 3.0, (Ref. 8) for analysis of selected
chemicals, including DEHP (58 FR 41612). In the 1996 document, FDA
adopted EPA Methods 506 and 525.1, Rev. 3.0, for all the chemicals with
the exception of DEHP (61 FR 13258). EPA has since updated its methods
for DEHP (Refs. 9 and 10). In this document, FDA is making EPA's
updated methods for DEHP analysis (Refs. 9 and 10) available for
comment on their possible inclusion in the final regulation.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
IV. References
FDA has placed the following references on display in FDA's
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). You may see them
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent
changes to Web sites after this document publishes in the Federal
Register.)
1. John Rost, Crown Packaging Technology, 2010, personal
communication, January 5, 2010.
2. European Commission, 2007, Commission Directive 2007/19/EC of
30 March 2007 amending Directive 2002/72/EC relating to plastic
materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and
Council Directive 85/572/EEC laying down the list of simulants to be
used for testing migration of constituents of plastic materials and
articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs, Official
Journal of the European Union, 31.3.2007, L 91/17-36.
3. International Bottled Water Association, 2007, IBWA Model
Code, Version October 2007, accessed online at https://www.bottledwater.org/files/IBWA%20Bottled%20Water%20Code%20of%20Practice.pdf.
4. International Bottled Water Association, 2007, personal
communication, August 30, 2007.
5. World Health Organization, 2008, Guidelines for drinking-
water quality, third edition, incorporating first and second
addenda, World Health Organization: Geneva, accessed online at
https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/fulltext.pdf.
6. Codex Alimentarius, 2001, General Standard for Bottled/
Packaged Drinking Waters (Other than Natural Mineral Waters), CODEX
STAN 227-2001, accessed online at www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/369/CXS_227e.pdf.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), EPA Method 506--
``Determination of Phthalate and Adipate Esters in Drinking Water by
Liquid-Liquid Extraction or Liquid-Solid Extraction and Gas
Chromatography with Photoionization Detection, '' In ``Methods for
the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water, Supplement
I,'' July 1990.
8. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.1, Revision 2.2--``Determination of
Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction and
Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry.'' In
``Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds in Drinking
Water, Supplement I,'' May 1991, accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/waterscience/methods/method/files/525_1.pdf
9. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 506, Rev. 1.1--``Determination of
phthalate and adipate esters in drinking water by liquid/liquid
extraction or liquid/solid extraction and gas chromatography with
photoionization detection,'' In ``Analytical Methods Approved for
Drinking Water Compliance Monitoring of Organic Contaminants,'' June
2008, accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/methods/pdfs/methods/organic_080521b.pdf.
10. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.2, Rev. 2.0--``Determination of
organic compounds in drinking water by liquid-solid extraction and
capillary column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, '' In
``Analytical Methods Approved for Drinking Water Compliance
Monitoring of Organic Contaminants,'' June 2008, accessed online at
https://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/methods/pdfs/methods/organic_080521b.pdf.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-7292 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S