Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 16425-16426 [2010-7256]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices is 40 percent of the Final Housing Unit Followup workload. There will be two Final Housing Unit Followup forms, D–1340 and D– 1340PR. The D–1340 is the English language version of the Final Housing Unit Followup form and will be used to collect data and to conduct Quality Control for addresses in CCM stateside sample areas. The D–1340PR is the Spanish language version of the Final Housing Unit Followup form, which will be used for the same purpose in the CCM sample areas of Puerto Rico. II. Method of Collection The CCM Final Housing Unit Followup and Final Housing Unit Followup Quality Control operations will be conducted through personal visits using a paper questionnaire. The CCM Final Housing Unit Followup and Final Housing Unit Followup Quality Control operations will occur starting May 5, 2011 through June 18, 2011. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Definition of Terms Components of Census Coverage— The four components of census coverage are census omissions (missed persons or housing units), erroneous enumerations (persons or housing units), correct enumerations, and whole-person imputations (census person enumerations on which we did not collect sufficient information). Examples of erroneous enumerations are persons or housing units enumerated in the census that should not have been enumerated at all, persons or housing units enumerated in an incorrect location, and persons or housing units enumerated more than once (duplicates). Net Coverage Error—Net Coverage Error is the difference between the estimate of the true population count and the actual census count. A positive net error indicates an undercount, while a negative net error indicates an overcount. For more information about the Census 2010 Coverage Measurement Program, please visit the following page of the Census Bureau’s Web site: https:// www.census.gov/cac/www/pdf/ coverage-measurement-program.pdf III. Data OMB Control Number: None. Form Number: D–1340, D–1340 (PR). Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: Individuals or Households. Estimated Number of Respondents: 24,496 housing units for Final Housing Unit Followup and 13,693 housing units for Final Housing Unit Followup Quality Control. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:51 Mar 31, 2010 Jkt 220001 Estimated Time per Response: 3 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,910 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost: No cost to the respondents except for their time to respond. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S. Code, Sections 141, 193, and 221. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: March 26, 2010. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2010–7277 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in order to extend the public comment period due to a recalculation of the burden hour estimates for the collection and an updated time estimate for completion of the paper and electronic submissions of the questionnaires and customer surveys, is republishing the Comment Request originally published on February 1, 2010 (75 FR 5036). This notice announces the intent to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16425 Title: Customer Input—Patent and Trademark Customer Surveys. Form Number(s): None. Agency Approval Number: 0651– 0038. Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection. Burden: 356 hours. Number of Respondents: 1,900 responses. Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the public approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) to complete a telephone survey and 10 minutes (0.17 hours) to complete both the paper and electronic submissions of the questionnaires and customer surveys. This includes the time to gather the necessary information, respond to the survey, and submit it to the USPTO. Needs and Uses: The public uses the telephone and customer surveys and the questionnaires to provide their opinions, suggestions, and comments about the USPTO’s services, products, and customer service. Depending on the type of survey, the public can provide their comments on the spot to the interviewer, or complete the survey at their own pace and either mail their responses to the USPTO or submit their responses electronically via a web-based survey. The USPTO uses the data collected from these surveys for strategic planning, allocation of resources, the establishment of performance goals, and the verification and establishment of service standards. The USPTO also uses this data to assess customer satisfaction with USPTO products and services, to assess customer priorities in service characteristics, and to identify areas where service levels differ from customer expectations. Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other for profits; and not-for-profit institutions. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, e-mail: Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. Once submitted, the request will be publically available in electronic format through the Information Collection Review page at https://www.reginfo.gov. Paper copies can be obtained by: • E-mail: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0038 copy request’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the attention of Susan K. Fawcett. • Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 16426 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Notices Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent on or before May 3, 2010 to Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail to Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the attention of Nicholas A. Fraser. Dated: March 25, 2010. Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2010–7256 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4697. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspension of investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), may request, in accordance with section 351.213 of the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) regulations, that the Department conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative review initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the period of review (‘‘POR’’). We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and make our decision regarding respondent selection within 20 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within 10 calendar days of publication of the Federal Register initiation notice. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of April 2010,1 interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in April for the following periods: Period of review mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Antidumping Duty Proceedings France: Sorbitol, A–427–001 ....................................................................................................................................................... India: 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1–Diphosphonic Acid (HEDP) A–533–847 .................................................................................. Norway: Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon, A–403–801 ........................................................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Activated Carbon, A–570–904 ............................................................................................................................................. Certain Steel Threaded Rod, A–570–932 ............................................................................................................................ Frontseating Service Valves, A–570–933 ............................................................................................................................ 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1–Diphosphonic Acid (HEDP), A–570–934 ................................................................................... Magnesium Metal, A–570–896 ............................................................................................................................................. Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, A–570–875 ............................................................................................................. Russia: Magnesium Metal, A–821–819 ....................................................................................................................................... Countervailing Duty Proceedings Norway: Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon, C–403–802 ........................................................................................................... 4/1/09–3/31/10 4/23/09–3/31/10 4/1/09–3/31/10 4/1/09–3/31/10 10/8/08–3/31/10 10/22/08–3/31/10 4/23/09–3/31/10 4/1/09–3/31/10 4/1/09–3/31/10 4/1/09–3/31/10 1/1/09–12/31/09 Suspension Agreements None. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters.2 If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party’s location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. 2 If the review request involves a non-market economy country and the parties subject to the review request do not qualify for separate rates, all other exporters of subject merchandise from the non-market economy country who do not have a separate rate will be covered by the review as part of the single entity of which the named firms are a part. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:51 Mar 31, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16425-16426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), in order to 
extend the public comment period due to a recalculation of the burden 
hour estimates for the collection and an updated time estimate for 
completion of the paper and electronic submissions of the 
questionnaires and customer surveys, is republishing the Comment 
Request originally published on February 1, 2010 (75 FR 5036). This 
notice announces the intent to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
    Title: Customer Input--Patent and Trademark Customer Surveys.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Agency Approval Number: 0651-0038.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 356 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 1,900 responses.
    Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the 
public approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) to complete a telephone 
survey and 10 minutes (0.17 hours) to complete both the paper and 
electronic submissions of the questionnaires and customer surveys. This 
includes the time to gather the necessary information, respond to the 
survey, and submit it to the USPTO.
    Needs and Uses: The public uses the telephone and customer surveys 
and the questionnaires to provide their opinions, suggestions, and 
comments about the USPTO's services, products, and customer service. 
Depending on the type of survey, the public can provide their comments 
on the spot to the interviewer, or complete the survey at their own 
pace and either mail their responses to the USPTO or submit their 
responses electronically via a web-based survey. The USPTO uses the 
data collected from these surveys for strategic planning, allocation of 
resources, the establishment of performance goals, and the verification 
and establishment of service standards. The USPTO also uses this data 
to assess customer satisfaction with USPTO products and services, to 
assess customer priorities in service characteristics, and to identify 
areas where service levels differ from customer expectations.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other for 
profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, e-mail: Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
    Once submitted, the request will be publically available in 
electronic format through the Information Collection Review page at 
https://www.reginfo.gov.
    Paper copies can be obtained by:
     E-mail: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0038 copy request'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan K. 
Fawcett.
     Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

[[Page 16426]]

    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent on or before May 3, 2010 to Nicholas A. 
Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail to Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202-395-5167, marked to the attention 
of Nicholas A. Fraser.

    Dated: March 25, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-7256 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.