Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of Devices; Requirement for Submission of Information on Pediatric Subpopulations That Suffer From a Disease or Condition That a Device Is Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or Cure, 16365-16370 [2010-7192]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
act, bottled water containing DEHP at a
level considered injurious to health
under section 402(a)(1) of the act is
deemed to be adulterated.
B. Use of DEHP in Bottled Water
Bottles and Lid Gaskets
The comment on the 1993 proposal
stated that: (a) DEHP is routinely used
as a plasticizer in gaskets used in metal
and plastic closures for the packaging of
bottled water in accord with the prior
sanction, and that such use may result
in levels of DEHP migrating into water
that exceed the proposed allowable
level, and that (b) gaskets containing
DEHP are permitted for use in packaging
food and bottled water under relevant
European national regulations.
However, based on information from
industry, it appears that DEHP currently
is not used in caps or closures for
bottled water in the U.S (Ref. 1).
Furthermore, FDA notes that current
European Commission (EC) regulations
limit the use of DEHP as a plasticizer in
food contact materials to repeated use
materials (Ref. 2). DEHP use is not
permitted under EC regulations for
plastic caps or plastic lid gaskets in
metal caps.
C. International Standards for DEHP
in Bottled Water
FDA also notes that several
international organizations have
adopted standards for DEHP that are the
same or similar to FDA’s proposed
allowable level of 0.006 mg/L. The
International Bottled Water Association
(IBWA), a trade association representing
a large segment of the U.S. bottled water
industry, had adopted EPA’s 0.006 mg/
l standard for DEHP in its Model Code
by 1995, suggesting that U.S.
manufacturers already are able to meet
the proposed level (Refs. 3 and 4). In
addition, the World Health Organization
(WHO) has established a guideline value
for DEHP in drinking water of 0.008 mg/
L (Ref. 5). The Codex Alimentarius
General Standard for Bottled/Packaged
Drinking Waters (Other than Natural
Mineral Waters) requires that bottled/
packaged drinking waters comply with
WHO’s guideline values (Ref. 6).
D. Analytical Methodology
In the 1993 proposal, FDA proposed
adopting EPA Method 506 (Ref. 7) and
EPA Method 525.1, Revision 3.0, (Ref. 8)
for analysis of selected chemicals,
including DEHP (58 FR 41612). In the
1996 document, FDA adopted EPA
Methods 506 and 525.1, Rev. 3.0, for all
the chemicals with the exception of
DEHP (61 FR 13258). EPA has since
updated its methods for DEHP (Refs. 9
and 10). In this document, FDA is
making EPA’s updated methods for
DEHP analysis (Refs. 9 and 10) available
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
for comment on their possible inclusion
in the final regulation.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
IV. References
FDA has placed the following
references on display in FDA’s Division
of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). You may see them between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday. (FDA has verified the Web site
addresses, but FDA is not responsible
for any subsequent changes to Web sites
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
1. John Rost, Crown Packaging Technology,
2010, personal communication, January 5,
2010.
2. European Commission, 2007,
Commission Directive 2007/19/EC of 30
March 2007 amending Directive 2002/72/EC
relating to plastic materials and articles
intended to come into contact with food and
Council Directive 85/572/EEC laying down
the list of simulants to be used for testing
migration of constituents of plastic materials
and articles intended to come into contact
with foodstuffs, Official Journal of the
European Union, 31.3.2007, L 91/17–36.
3. International Bottled Water Association,
2007, IBWA Model Code, Version October
2007, accessed online at https://
www.bottledwater.org/files/
IBWA%20Bottled%20Water%20Code%
20of%20Practice.pdf.
4. International Bottled Water Association,
2007, personal communication, August 30,
2007.
5. World Health Organization, 2008,
Guidelines for drinking-water quality, third
edition, incorporating first and second
addenda, World Health Organization:
Geneva, accessed online at https://
www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/
fulltext.pdf.
6. Codex Alimentarius, 2001, General
Standard for Bottled/Packaged Drinking
Waters (Other than Natural Mineral Waters),
CODEX STAN 227–2001, accessed online at
www.codexalimentarius.net/download/
standards/369/CXS_227e.pdf.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), EPA Method 506—‘‘Determination of
Phthalate and Adipate Esters in Drinking
Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction or LiquidSolid Extraction and Gas Chromatography
with Photoionization Detection, ’’ In
‘‘Methods for the Determination of Organic
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16365
Compounds in Drinking Water, Supplement
I,’’ July 1990.
8. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.1, Revision
2.2—‘‘Determination of Organic Compounds
in Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction
and Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry.’’ In ‘‘Methods for the
Determination of Organic Compounds in
Drinking Water, Supplement I,’’ May 1991,
accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/
waterscience/methods/method/files/
525_1.pdf
9. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 506, Rev. 1.1—
‘‘Determination of phthalate and adipate
esters in drinking water by liquid/liquid
extraction or liquid/solid extraction and gas
chromatography with photoionization
detection,’’ In ‘‘Analytical Methods Approved
for Drinking Water Compliance Monitoring of
Organic Contaminants,’’ June 2008, accessed
online at https://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/
methods/pdfs/methods/organic_080521b.pdf.
10. U.S. EPA, EPA Method 525.2, Rev.
2.0—‘‘Determination of organic compounds
in drinking water by liquid-solid extraction
and capillary column gas chromatography/
mass spectrometry, ’’ In ‘‘Analytical Methods
Approved for Drinking Water Compliance
Monitoring of Organic Contaminants,’’ June
2008, accessed online at https://www.epa.gov/
ogwdw000/methods/pdfs/methods/
organic_080521b.pdf.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–7292 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 814
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0458]
RIN 0910–AG29
Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of
Devices; Requirement for Submission
of Information on Pediatric
Subpopulations That Suffer From a
Disease or Condition That a Device Is
Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or Cure
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is proposing to
amend the regulations on premarket
approval of medical devices to include
requirements relating to the submission
of information on pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that a device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, we are publishing a
companion direct final rule. This
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
16366
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
proposed rule will provide a procedural
framework to finalize the rule in the
event we receive significant adverse
comment and withdraw the direct final
rule.
DATES: Submit electronic or written
comments on the proposed rule by June
15, 2010. Submit electronic or written
comments on the information collection
requirements by June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2009–N–
0458, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number and regulatory
information number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Gatling, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 1640, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–6560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why Is This Companion Proposed
Rule Being Issued?
This proposed rule is a companion to
a direct final rule regarding the
submission of information on pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from a
disease or condition that a device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure. The
direct final rule is published in the final
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register. The direct final rule and this
companion proposed rule are
substantively identical. This companion
proposed rule provides the procedural
framework to finalize the rule in the
event that the direct final rule receives
any significant adverse comment and is
withdrawn. We are publishing the direct
final rule because we believe the rule is
noncontroversial, and we do not
anticipate receiving any significant
adverse comments. If no significant
adverse comment is received in
response to the direct final rule, no
further action will be taken relating to
this proposed rule. Instead, we will
publish a notice within 30 days after the
comment period ends confirming when
the direct final rule will go into effect.
If we receive any significant adverse
comment regarding the direct final rule
we will withdraw the direct final rule
within 30 days after the comment
period ends and proceed to respond to
all of the comments under this
companion proposed rule using our
usual notice-and-comment rulemaking
procedures under the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 552a et
seq.). The comment period for this
companion proposed rule runs
concurrently with the direct final rule’s
comment period. Any comments
received under this companion
proposed rule will be considered as
comments regarding the direct final rule
and vice versa. We will not provide
additional opportunity for comment.
A significant adverse comment is
defined as a comment that explains why
the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach, or
would be ineffective or unacceptable
without change. In determining whether
an adverse comment is significant and
warrants withdrawing a direct final
rulemaking, we will consider whether
the comment raises an issue serious
enough to warrant a substantive
response in a notice-and-comment
process in accordance with section 553
of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553). Comments
that are frivolous, insubstantial, or
outside the scope of the rule will not be
considered a significant adverse
comment, unless the comment states
why the rule would be ineffective
without the additional change. In
addition, if a significant adverse
comment applies to part of a rule and
that part can be severed from the
remainder of the rule, we may adopt as
final those parts of the rule that are not
the subject of a significant adverse
comment.
In the Federal Register of November
21, 1997 (62 FR 62466), you can find
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
additional information about FDA’s
direct final rulemaking procedures in
our guidance document entitled
‘‘Guidance for FDA and Industry: Direct
Final Rule Procedures.’’ This guidance
document is available at https://
www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/ucm125166.htm.
II. What Is the Background of This
Proposed Rule?
On September 27, 2007, the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA)1 (Public Law 110–85)
amended the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the act) by adding, among
other things, a new section 515A of the
act (21 U.S.C. 360e–1). Section 515A(a)
of the act requires persons who submit
certain medical device applications to
include readily available information
providing a description of any pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that the device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure, and
the number of affected pediatric
patients. This proposed rule amends
FDA’s regulations to implement the
requirements of section 515A(a) of the
act.
Section 515A(c) of the act states that,
for the purposes of that section, the term
‘‘pediatric subpopulation’’ has the
meaning given the term in section
520(m)(6)(E)(ii) of the act (21 U.S.C.
360j(m)(6)(E)(ii)). Section
520(m)(6)(E)(ii) of the act defines the
term ‘‘pediatric subpopulation’’ to mean
one of the following populations:
• Neonates;
• Infants;
• Children; or
• Adolescents.
We have previously issued guidance
recommending the age range for each of
the populations included in the term
‘‘pediatric subpopulation.’’ See
Premarket Assessment of Pediatric
Medical Devices (May 14, 2004); https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/ucm089740.htm.
The term ‘‘pediatric patient’’ is
defined, for purposes of section
520(m)(6)(E)(i) of the act as patients who
are 21 years of age or younger at the
time of the diagnosis or treatment.
Because no other definition of ‘‘pediatric
patient’’ is included in the Pediatric
Medical Device Safety and Improvement
Act of 2007, and because the definition
in section 520(m)(6)(E)(i) of the act is
consistent with the definition of
pediatric subpopulations in section
520(m)(6)(E)(ii), FDA has concluded
1 Title III of FDAAA, which includes new section
515A, is also known as the Pediatric Medical
Device Safety and Improvement Act of 2007.
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
that the term ‘‘pediatric patient’’ in
section 515A of the act refers to patients
who are 21 years of age or younger at
the time of the diagnosis or treatment.
The information submitted under
section 515A(a) of the act will help FDA
track the following information that it is
required to report annually to Congress,
in accordance with section 515A(a)(3) of
the act:
• The number of approved devices for
which there is a pediatric subpopulation
that suffers from the disease or
condition that the device is intended to
treat, diagnose, or cure;
• The number of approved devices
labeled for use in pediatric patients;
• The number of approved pediatric
devices that were exempted from a
review fee under section 738(a)(2)(B)(v)
of the act (21 U.S.C. 379j(a)(2)(B)(v));
and
• The review time for each such
device.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
III. What Applications Are Subject to
This Proposed Rule?
In accordance with the act, these
requirements apply to the following
applications when submitted on or after
the effective date of this proposed rule:
• Any request for a humanitarian
device exemption (HDE) submitted
under section 520(m) of the act;
• Any premarket approval
application (PMA) or supplement to a
PMA submitted under section 515 of the
act; and
• Any product development protocol
(PDP) submitted under section 515 of
the act.
If the applicant of a supplement to a
PMA has previously submitted
information satisfying these
requirements, the applicant may
incorporate that information by
reference rather than resubmitting the
same information. However, if
additional information has become
readily available to the applicant since
the previous submission, the applicant
must submit that information as part of
the supplement.
Many PMAs begin with the
submission of one or more PMA
modules; see Premarket Approval
Application Modular Review—Guidance
for Industry and FDA Staff, available at
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/ucm089764.htm.
Applicants who choose to use the
modular approach should submit the
information required by section 515A(a)
of the act in the final PMA module (i.e.,
the module that includes final clinical
data, proposed labeling, and the
summary of safety and effectiveness).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
IV. What Does This Proposed Rule Do?
This proposed rule would implement
new section 515A(a) of the act by
amending 21 CFR Part 814, Premarket
Approval of Medical Devices, to include
requirements relating to the submission
of information on pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that a device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure.
A. What Information Must Be Provided?
This proposed rule requires each
applicant who submits an HDE, PMA,
supplement to a PMA, or PDP to
include, if ‘‘readily available,’’ a
description of any pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that the device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure, and
the number of affected pediatric
patients.
B. What Are the Consequences of Not
Submitting ‘‘Readily Available’’
Information?
If you do not submit the information
required by section 515A(a) of the act,
FDA may not approve your application
until you provide the required
information. We intend to contact you
during the normal course of our review
to inform you that your submission
lacks the information required by
section 515A(a) of the act and by this
proposed rule, and to ask you to amend
your application to provide the required
information. If your application has no
other deficiencies and otherwise meets
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements for approval, but still lacks
information required by section 515A(a)
of the act, we intend to send you an
‘‘approvable’’ letter informing you that
we will approve your application after
you provide the information required by
section 515A(a). If your application has
other deficiencies or does not meet all
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements for approval, we intend to
send you a ‘‘not approvable’’ letter or a
‘‘major deficiency’’ letter describing
what information or data you need to
provide before FDA can approve your
application; the ‘‘not approvable’’ or
‘‘major deficiency’’ letter may cite the
absence of 515A(a) information in the
section listing minor deficiencies. For
additional information concerning the
interactive process we will use during
our review, see Guidance for Industry
and FDA Staff: Interactive Review for
Medical Device Submissions: 510(k)s,
Original PMAs, PMA Supplements,
Original BLAs, and BLA Supplements,
available at https://www.fda.gov/
MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation
andGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16367
ucm089402.htm. For additional
information concerning ‘‘approvable,’’
‘‘not approvable,’’ and ‘‘major
deficiency’’ letters, see FDA and
Industry Actions on Premarket Approval
Applications (PMAs): Effect on FDA
Review Clock and Goals, available at
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/ucm089733.htm.
V. What Is the Legal Authority for This
Proposed Rule?
This proposed rule, if finalized,
would amend §§ 814.1, 814.2, 814.20,
814.37, 814.39, 814.44, 814.100,
814.104, and 814.116. FDA’s legal
authority to modify §§ 814.1, 814.2,
814.20, 814.37, 814.39, 814.44, 814.100,
814.104, and 814.116 arises from the
same authority under which FDA
initially issued these regulations, the
device and general administrative
provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331,
351, 352, 360e, 360e–1, 360j, and 371).
VI. What Is the Environmental Impact
of This Proposed Rule?
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.30(h) and 25.34(a) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VII. What Is the Economic Impact of
This Proposed Rule?
We have examined the impacts of this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). We believe that
this proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this regulation only
requires that some submissions include
a small amount of readily available
information, creating little additional
burden, the agency certifies that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
16368
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $133
million, using the most current (2008)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. We do not expect
this rule to result in any 1-year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
We believe that the only costs to
industry are those that we account for
in our Paperwork Reduction Act
analysis, which immediately follows
this section. The proposed rule does not
require additional clinical research or
other costly efforts, and simply requires
the applicant to briefly summarize
readily available information that will
have been reviewed by the applicant
during the course of its development of
the device and preparation of its
application to FDA. We have also
limited the proposed rule to exclude
supplements that do not involve a new
intended use; if a supplement does not
involve a new intended use, we do not
expect the applicant will have new
information pertinent to the
requirement of section 515A(a) of the
act and this rule, and the limitation
avoids the needless submission of
duplicate information to FDA. We
expect FDA’s additional costs will be
inconsequential, as the information
required here will be filed and managed
as an integral part of each submission,
using existing filing, storage, and data
management systems and processes.
VIII. How Does the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 Apply to This
Proposed Rule?
This proposed rule contains
information collection requirements that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The title,
description, and respondent description
of the information collection provisions
are shown below with an estimate of the
annual reporting burden. Included in
the estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing each collection of
information. FDA invites comments on:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
FDA’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses
of Devices; Requirement for Submission
of Information on Pediatric
Subpopulations That Suffer From a
Disease or Condition That a Device Is
Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or Cure.
Description: Section 515A(a) of
FDAAA requires applicants who submit
certain medical device applications to
include readily available information
providing a description of any pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that the device is
intended to treat, diagnose, or cure, and
the number of affected pediatric
patients. The information submitted
will allow FDA to track the number of
approved devices for which there is a
pediatric subpopulation that suffers
from the disease or condition that the
device is intended to treat, diagnose, or
cure; the number of approved devices
labeled for use in pediatric patients; the
number of approved pediatric devices
that were exempted from a review fee
under section 738(a)(2)(B)(v) of the act;
and the review time for each such
device.
Description of Respondents: These
requirements apply to applicants who
submit the following applications when
submitted on or after the effective date
of this rule:
• Any request for an HDE submitted
under section 520(m) of the act;
• Any PMA submitted under section
515 of the act;
• Any PDP submitted under section
515 of the act; and
• Any supplement to an HDE, PMA,
or PDP that proposes a new intended
use, whether for an adult population or
a pediatric population.
Burden: FDA estimates the burden of
this collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
21 CFR Section
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
814.20(b)(3)(i)
25
1
25
4
100
814.37(b)(2)
10
1
10
4
40
814.39(h)
10
1
10
4
40
5
1
5
4
20
814.104(b)(6)
Totals
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
1 There
200
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
All that is required is to access,
organize, and submit information that is
readily available, using any approach
that meets the requirements of section
515A(a) of the act and this rule. FDA
expects to receive approximately 40
original PMA/PDP/HDE applications
each year, 5 of which FDA expects to be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
HDEs. This estimate is based on the
actual average of FDA’s receipt of new
PMA applications in FY 2007 through
FY 2008. The agency estimates that 10
of those 40 original PMA submissions
will fail to provide the required
pediatric use information and their
sponsors will therefore be required to
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit PMA amendments. The agency
also expects to receive 10 supplements
that describe a new indication for use
and will include the pediatric use
information required by 515A(a) of the
act and this rule. We believe that
because the rule requires that the
applicant organize and submit only
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
readily available information, no more
than 4 hours will be required to comply
with section 515A(a) of the act and this
rule. FDA estimates that the total
burden created by this rule is 200 hours.
We based this estimate on our
experience with similar information
collection requirements and on
consultations with the Interagency
Pediatric Devices Working Group which
includes the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality, FDA, National
Institutes of Health, members of the
Pediatric Advisory Committee,
researchers, healthcare practitioners,
medical device trade associations, and
medical device manufacturers.
In compliance with the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the agency has
submitted the information collection
provisions of this proposed rule to OMB
for review. As provided in 5 CFR
1320.5(c)(1), collections of information
in a proposed rule are subject to the
procedures set forth in 5 CFR 1320.10.
Interested persons and organizations
may submit comments on the
information collection requirements of
this proposed rule (see DATES) to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES).
At the close of the 60-day comment
period, FDA will review the comments
received, revise the information
collection provisions as necessary, and
submit these provisions to OMB for
review. FDA will publish a notice in the
Federal Register when the information
collection provisions are submitted to
OMB, and an opportunity for public
comment to OMB will be provided at
that time. Prior to the effective date of
the direct final rule, FDA will publish
a notice in the Federal Register of
OMB’s decision to approve, modify, or
disapprove the information collection
provisions. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
IX. What Are the Federalism Impacts of
This Proposed Rule?
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. We
have determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
have concluded that the rule does not
contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
order and, consequently, a federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
X. How Do You Submit Comments on
This Rule?
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments regarding this proposed rule.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Medical devices, Medical
research, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 814 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 814—PREMARKET APPROVAL
OF MEDICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 814 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360,
360c–360j, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 379, 379e,
381.
2. In § 814.1, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 814.1
Scope.
(a) This section implements sections
515 and 515A of the act by providing
procedures for the premarket approval
of medical devices intended for human
use.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 814.2 to read as follows:
§ 814.2
Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to establish
an efficient and thorough device review
process—
(a) To facilitate the approval of PMAs
for devices that have been shown to be
safe and effective and that otherwise
meet the statutory criteria for approval;
(b) To ensure the disapproval of
PMAs that have not been shown to be
safe and effective or that do not
otherwise meet the statutory criteria for
approval; and
(c) To ensure PMAs include readily
available information concerning actual
and potential pediatric uses of medical
devices.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16369
4. In § 814.20, revise paragraph
(b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
§ 814.20
Application.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Indications for use. (A) A general
description of the disease or condition
the device will diagnose, treat, prevent,
cure, or mitigate, including a
description of the patient population for
which the device is intended.
(B) Information concerning uses in
pediatric patients who are 21 years of
age or younger: The application must
include the following information, if
readily available:
(1) A description of any pediatric
subpopulations (neonates, infants,
children, adolescents) that suffer from
the disease or condition that the device
is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure;
and
(2) The number of affected pediatric
patients.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 814.37, revise the section
heading and paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
§ 814.37 PMA amendments and
resubmitted PMAs.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) FDA may request the applicant
to amend a PMA or PMA supplement
with any information regarding the
device that is necessary for FDA or the
appropriate advisory committee to
complete the review of the PMA or PMA
supplement.
(2) FDA may request the applicant to
amend a PMA or PMA supplement with
information concerning pediatric uses
as required under § 814.20(b)(3)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 814.39, add paragraph (h) to
read as follows:
§ 814.39
PMA supplements.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) The application must include the
following information, if readily
available:
(1) A description of any pediatric
subpopulations (neonates, infants,
children, adolescents) that suffer from
the disease or condition that the device
is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure;
and
(2) The number of affected pediatric
patients who are 21 years of age or
younger.
(3) If information concerning the
device that is the subject of the
supplement was previously submitted
under § 814.20(b)(3)(i), that information
may be incorporated by reference to the
application or submission that contains
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
16370
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 62 / Thursday, April 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the information. However, if additional
information required under
§ 814.20(b)(3)(i) has become readily
available to the applicant since the
previous submission, the applicant must
submit that information as part of the
supplement.
7. In § 814.44, redesignate paragraphs
(e)(1)(ii) through (e)(1)(iv) as paragraphs
(e)(1)(iii) through (e)(1)(v), respectively,
and add new paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to read
as follows:
§ 814.44
Procedures for review of a PMA.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The submission of additional
information concerning potential
pediatric uses required by
§ 814.20(b)(3)(i) that is readily available
to the applicant;
*
*
*
*
*
8. Amend § 814.100 as follows:
a. Redesignate paragraphs (b) through
(e) as paragraphs (d) through (g),
respectively;
b. Redesignate paragraph (a) as
paragraph (b), and remove the first
sentence of redesignated paragraph (b);
and
c. Add new paragraphs (a) and (c) to
read as follows:
§ 814.100
Purpose and scope.
(a) This subpart H implements
sections 515A and 520(m) of the act.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Section 515A of the act is intended
to ensure the submission of readily
available information concerning actual
and potential pediatric uses of medical
devices.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Amend § 814.104 as follows:
a. Revise the last sentence of
paragraph (b)(4)(ii);
b. Revise the last sentence of
paragraph (b)(5); and
c. Add paragraph (b)(6) to read as
follows:
§ 814.104
Original applications.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * * The effectiveness of this
device for this use has not been
demonstrated.
(5) * * * If the amount charged is
$250 or less, the requirement for a
report by an independent certified
public accountant or an attestation by a
responsible individual of the
organization is waived; and
(6) Readily available information
concerning actual and potential
pediatric uses of the device, as required
by § 814.20(b)(3)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:06 Mar 31, 2010
Jkt 220001
10. In § 814.116, redesignate
paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(4) as
paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(5),
respectively, and add new paragraph
(c)(2) to read as follows:
§ 814.116
HDE.
Procedures for review of an
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The submission of additional
information concerning potential
pediatric uses required by
§ 814.20(b)(3)(i) that is readily available
to the applicant;
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 17, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–7192 Filed 3–31–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 150 and 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0589]
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LCDR Pamela Garcia,
Coast Guard; telephone 617–223–3028;
e-mail Pamela.P.Garcia@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 1625–AA00, RIN 1625–AA11
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Regulated Navigation Areas, Safety
Zones, Security Zones; Deepwater
Ports in Boston Captain of the Port
Zone, MA
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish new regulated navigation areas
(RNAs) and safety and security zones for
deepwater liquefied natural gas (LNG)
ports in the Boston Captain of the Port
(COTP) Zone, off the coast of
Gloucester, Massachusetts. The
proposed RNAs and safety and security
zones are in waters around the Neptune
Deepwater Port Facility (Neptune). They
would protect vessels and mariners
from the potential safety hazards
associated with deepwater port
operations, and protect liquefied natural
gas carriers (LNGCs) and deepwater port
infrastructure from security threats or
other subversive acts, by prohibiting
certain operations and imposing
conditions on others.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0589 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0589),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 62 (Thursday, April 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16365-16370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7192]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 814
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0458]
RIN 0910-AG29
Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of Devices; Requirement for
Submission of Information on Pediatric Subpopulations That Suffer From
a Disease or Condition That a Device Is Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or
Cure
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend
the regulations on premarket approval of medical devices to include
requirements relating to the submission of information on pediatric
subpopulations that suffer from the disease or condition that a device
is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, we are publishing a companion direct final rule. This
[[Page 16366]]
proposed rule will provide a procedural framework to finalize the rule
in the event we receive significant adverse comment and withdraw the
direct final rule.
DATES: Submit electronic or written comments on the proposed rule by
June 15, 2010. Submit electronic or written comments on the information
collection requirements by June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2009-
N-0458, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number and regulatory information number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the
``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Gatling, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 1640, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
6560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why Is This Companion Proposed Rule Being Issued?
This proposed rule is a companion to a direct final rule regarding
the submission of information on pediatric subpopulations that suffer
from a disease or condition that a device is intended to treat,
diagnose, or cure. The direct final rule is published in the final
rules section of this issue of the Federal Register. The direct final
rule and this companion proposed rule are substantively identical. This
companion proposed rule provides the procedural framework to finalize
the rule in the event that the direct final rule receives any
significant adverse comment and is withdrawn. We are publishing the
direct final rule because we believe the rule is noncontroversial, and
we do not anticipate receiving any significant adverse comments. If no
significant adverse comment is received in response to the direct final
rule, no further action will be taken relating to this proposed rule.
Instead, we will publish a notice within 30 days after the comment
period ends confirming when the direct final rule will go into effect.
If we receive any significant adverse comment regarding the direct
final rule we will withdraw the direct final rule within 30 days after
the comment period ends and proceed to respond to all of the comments
under this companion proposed rule using our usual notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 552a et seq.). The comment period for this companion proposed
rule runs concurrently with the direct final rule's comment period. Any
comments received under this companion proposed rule will be considered
as comments regarding the direct final rule and vice versa. We will not
provide additional opportunity for comment.
A significant adverse comment is defined as a comment that explains
why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable
without change. In determining whether an adverse comment is
significant and warrants withdrawing a direct final rulemaking, we will
consider whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant
a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process in accordance
with section 553 of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553). Comments that are
frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the scope of the rule will not be
considered a significant adverse comment, unless the comment states why
the rule would be ineffective without the additional change. In
addition, if a significant adverse comment applies to part of a rule
and that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of a
significant adverse comment.
In the Federal Register of November 21, 1997 (62 FR 62466), you can
find additional information about FDA's direct final rulemaking
procedures in our guidance document entitled ``Guidance for FDA and
Industry: Direct Final Rule Procedures.'' This guidance document is
available at https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm125166.htm.
II. What Is the Background of This Proposed Rule?
On September 27, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments
Act of 2007 (FDAAA)\1\ (Public Law 110-85) amended the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) by adding, among other things, a new
section 515A of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e-1). Section 515A(a) of the act
requires persons who submit certain medical device applications to
include readily available information providing a description of any
pediatric subpopulations that suffer from the disease or condition that
the device is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure, and the number of
affected pediatric patients. This proposed rule amends FDA's
regulations to implement the requirements of section 515A(a) of the
act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Title III of FDAAA, which includes new section 515A, is also
known as the Pediatric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act of
2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 515A(c) of the act states that, for the purposes of that
section, the term ``pediatric subpopulation'' has the meaning given the
term in section 520(m)(6)(E)(ii) of the act (21 U.S.C.
360j(m)(6)(E)(ii)). Section 520(m)(6)(E)(ii) of the act defines the
term ``pediatric subpopulation'' to mean one of the following
populations:
Neonates;
Infants;
Children; or
Adolescents.
We have previously issued guidance recommending the age range for
each of the populations included in the term ``pediatric
subpopulation.'' See Premarket Assessment of Pediatric Medical Devices
(May 14, 2004); https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm089740.htm.
The term ``pediatric patient'' is defined, for purposes of section
520(m)(6)(E)(i) of the act as patients who are 21 years of age or
younger at the time of the diagnosis or treatment. Because no other
definition of ``pediatric patient'' is included in the Pediatric
Medical Device Safety and Improvement Act of 2007, and because the
definition in section 520(m)(6)(E)(i) of the act is consistent with the
definition of pediatric subpopulations in section 520(m)(6)(E)(ii), FDA
has concluded
[[Page 16367]]
that the term ``pediatric patient'' in section 515A of the act refers
to patients who are 21 years of age or younger at the time of the
diagnosis or treatment.
The information submitted under section 515A(a) of the act will
help FDA track the following information that it is required to report
annually to Congress, in accordance with section 515A(a)(3) of the act:
The number of approved devices for which there is a
pediatric subpopulation that suffers from the disease or condition that
the device is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure;
The number of approved devices labeled for use in
pediatric patients;
The number of approved pediatric devices that were
exempted from a review fee under section 738(a)(2)(B)(v) of the act (21
U.S.C. 379j(a)(2)(B)(v)); and
The review time for each such device.
III. What Applications Are Subject to This Proposed Rule?
In accordance with the act, these requirements apply to the
following applications when submitted on or after the effective date of
this proposed rule:
Any request for a humanitarian device exemption (HDE)
submitted under section 520(m) of the act;
Any premarket approval application (PMA) or supplement to
a PMA submitted under section 515 of the act; and
Any product development protocol (PDP) submitted under
section 515 of the act.
If the applicant of a supplement to a PMA has previously submitted
information satisfying these requirements, the applicant may
incorporate that information by reference rather than resubmitting the
same information. However, if additional information has become readily
available to the applicant since the previous submission, the applicant
must submit that information as part of the supplement.
Many PMAs begin with the submission of one or more PMA modules; see
Premarket Approval Application Modular Review--Guidance for Industry
and FDA Staff, available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm089764.htm. Applicants
who choose to use the modular approach should submit the information
required by section 515A(a) of the act in the final PMA module (i.e.,
the module that includes final clinical data, proposed labeling, and
the summary of safety and effectiveness).
IV. What Does This Proposed Rule Do?
This proposed rule would implement new section 515A(a) of the act
by amending 21 CFR Part 814, Premarket Approval of Medical Devices, to
include requirements relating to the submission of information on
pediatric subpopulations that suffer from the disease or condition that
a device is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure.
A. What Information Must Be Provided?
This proposed rule requires each applicant who submits an HDE, PMA,
supplement to a PMA, or PDP to include, if ``readily available,'' a
description of any pediatric subpopulations that suffer from the
disease or condition that the device is intended to treat, diagnose, or
cure, and the number of affected pediatric patients.
B. What Are the Consequences of Not Submitting ``Readily Available''
Information?
If you do not submit the information required by section 515A(a) of
the act, FDA may not approve your application until you provide the
required information. We intend to contact you during the normal course
of our review to inform you that your submission lacks the information
required by section 515A(a) of the act and by this proposed rule, and
to ask you to amend your application to provide the required
information. If your application has no other deficiencies and
otherwise meets applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for
approval, but still lacks information required by section 515A(a) of
the act, we intend to send you an ``approvable'' letter informing you
that we will approve your application after you provide the information
required by section 515A(a). If your application has other deficiencies
or does not meet all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements
for approval, we intend to send you a ``not approvable'' letter or a
``major deficiency'' letter describing what information or data you
need to provide before FDA can approve your application; the ``not
approvable'' or ``major deficiency'' letter may cite the absence of
515A(a) information in the section listing minor deficiencies. For
additional information concerning the interactive process we will use
during our review, see Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Interactive
Review for Medical Device Submissions: 510(k)s, Original PMAs, PMA
Supplements, Original BLAs, and BLA Supplements, available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm089402.htm. For additional information concerning
``approvable,'' ``not approvable,'' and ``major deficiency'' letters,
see FDA and Industry Actions on Premarket Approval Applications (PMAs):
Effect on FDA Review Clock and Goals, available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm089733.htm.
V. What Is the Legal Authority for This Proposed Rule?
This proposed rule, if finalized, would amend Sec. Sec. 814.1,
814.2, 814.20, 814.37, 814.39, 814.44, 814.100, 814.104, and 814.116.
FDA's legal authority to modify Sec. Sec. 814.1, 814.2, 814.20,
814.37, 814.39, 814.44, 814.100, 814.104, and 814.116 arises from the
same authority under which FDA initially issued these regulations, the
device and general administrative provisions of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 360e, 360e-1, 360j, and
371).
VI. What Is the Environmental Impact of This Proposed Rule?
FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) and 25.34(a) that this
action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VII. What Is the Economic Impact of This Proposed Rule?
We have examined the impacts of this proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). We believe that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this regulation only requires that some
submissions include a small amount of readily available information,
creating little additional burden, the agency certifies that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
[[Page 16368]]
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $133 million, using the most current (2008) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. We do not expect this
rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or exceed this
amount.
We believe that the only costs to industry are those that we
account for in our Paperwork Reduction Act analysis, which immediately
follows this section. The proposed rule does not require additional
clinical research or other costly efforts, and simply requires the
applicant to briefly summarize readily available information that will
have been reviewed by the applicant during the course of its
development of the device and preparation of its application to FDA. We
have also limited the proposed rule to exclude supplements that do not
involve a new intended use; if a supplement does not involve a new
intended use, we do not expect the applicant will have new information
pertinent to the requirement of section 515A(a) of the act and this
rule, and the limitation avoids the needless submission of duplicate
information to FDA. We expect FDA's additional costs will be
inconsequential, as the information required here will be filed and
managed as an integral part of each submission, using existing filing,
storage, and data management systems and processes.
VIII. How Does the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Apply to This
Proposed Rule?
This proposed rule contains information collection requirements
that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
title, description, and respondent description of the information
collection provisions are shown below with an estimate of the annual
reporting burden. Included in the estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing each
collection of information. FDA invites comments on: (1) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Title: Medical Devices; Pediatric Uses of Devices; Requirement for
Submission of Information on Pediatric Subpopulations That Suffer From
a Disease or Condition That a Device Is Intended to Treat, Diagnose, or
Cure.
Description: Section 515A(a) of FDAAA requires applicants who
submit certain medical device applications to include readily available
information providing a description of any pediatric subpopulations
that suffer from the disease or condition that the device is intended
to treat, diagnose, or cure, and the number of affected pediatric
patients. The information submitted will allow FDA to track the number
of approved devices for which there is a pediatric subpopulation that
suffers from the disease or condition that the device is intended to
treat, diagnose, or cure; the number of approved devices labeled for
use in pediatric patients; the number of approved pediatric devices
that were exempted from a review fee under section 738(a)(2)(B)(v) of
the act; and the review time for each such device.
Description of Respondents: These requirements apply to applicants
who submit the following applications when submitted on or after the
effective date of this rule:
Any request for an HDE submitted under section 520(m) of
the act;
Any PMA submitted under section 515 of the act;
Any PDP submitted under section 515 of the act; and
Any supplement to an HDE, PMA, or PDP that proposes a new
intended use, whether for an adult population or a pediatric
population.
Burden: FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information
as follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
21 CFR Section Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
814.20(b)(3)(i) 25 1 25 4 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
814.37(b)(2) 10 1 10 4 40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
814.39(h) 10 1 10 4 40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
814.104(b)(6) 5 1 5 4 20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals 200
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
All that is required is to access, organize, and submit information
that is readily available, using any approach that meets the
requirements of section 515A(a) of the act and this rule. FDA expects
to receive approximately 40 original PMA/PDP/HDE applications each
year, 5 of which FDA expects to be HDEs. This estimate is based on the
actual average of FDA's receipt of new PMA applications in FY 2007
through FY 2008. The agency estimates that 10 of those 40 original PMA
submissions will fail to provide the required pediatric use information
and their sponsors will therefore be required to submit PMA amendments.
The agency also expects to receive 10 supplements that describe a new
indication for use and will include the pediatric use information
required by 515A(a) of the act and this rule. We believe that because
the rule requires that the applicant organize and submit only
[[Page 16369]]
readily available information, no more than 4 hours will be required to
comply with section 515A(a) of the act and this rule. FDA estimates
that the total burden created by this rule is 200 hours.
We based this estimate on our experience with similar information
collection requirements and on consultations with the Interagency
Pediatric Devices Working Group which includes the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, FDA, National Institutes of Health,
members of the Pediatric Advisory Committee, researchers, healthcare
practitioners, medical device trade associations, and medical device
manufacturers.
In compliance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the agency has submitted the information
collection provisions of this proposed rule to OMB for review. As
provided in 5 CFR 1320.5(c)(1), collections of information in a
proposed rule are subject to the procedures set forth in 5 CFR 1320.10.
Interested persons and organizations may submit comments on the
information collection requirements of this proposed rule (see DATES)
to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
At the close of the 60-day comment period, FDA will review the
comments received, revise the information collection provisions as
necessary, and submit these provisions to OMB for review. FDA will
publish a notice in the Federal Register when the information
collection provisions are submitted to OMB, and an opportunity for
public comment to OMB will be provided at that time. Prior to the
effective date of the direct final rule, FDA will publish a notice in
the Federal Register of OMB's decision to approve, modify, or
disapprove the information collection provisions. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
IX. What Are the Federalism Impacts of This Proposed Rule?
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. We have determined that
the rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. Accordingly, we have concluded that
the rule does not contain policies that have federalism implications as
defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
X. How Do You Submit Comments on This Rule?
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments regarding this proposed
rule. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies
of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 814
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Medical devices, Medical research, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
814 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 814--PREMARKET APPROVAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 814 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 353, 360, 360c-360j, 371, 372,
373, 374, 375, 379, 379e, 381.
2. In Sec. 814.1, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.1 Scope.
(a) This section implements sections 515 and 515A of the act by
providing procedures for the premarket approval of medical devices
intended for human use.
* * * * *
3. Revise Sec. 814.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 814.2 Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to establish an efficient and thorough
device review process--
(a) To facilitate the approval of PMAs for devices that have been
shown to be safe and effective and that otherwise meet the statutory
criteria for approval;
(b) To ensure the disapproval of PMAs that have not been shown to
be safe and effective or that do not otherwise meet the statutory
criteria for approval; and
(c) To ensure PMAs include readily available information concerning
actual and potential pediatric uses of medical devices.
4. In Sec. 814.20, revise paragraph (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.20 Application.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Indications for use. (A) A general description of the disease
or condition the device will diagnose, treat, prevent, cure, or
mitigate, including a description of the patient population for which
the device is intended.
(B) Information concerning uses in pediatric patients who are 21
years of age or younger: The application must include the following
information, if readily available:
(1) A description of any pediatric subpopulations (neonates,
infants, children, adolescents) that suffer from the disease or
condition that the device is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure; and
(2) The number of affected pediatric patients.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 814.37, revise the section heading and paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 814.37 PMA amendments and resubmitted PMAs.
* * * * *
(b)(1) FDA may request the applicant to amend a PMA or PMA
supplement with any information regarding the device that is necessary
for FDA or the appropriate advisory committee to complete the review of
the PMA or PMA supplement.
(2) FDA may request the applicant to amend a PMA or PMA supplement
with information concerning pediatric uses as required under Sec.
814.20(b)(3)(i).
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 814.39, add paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.39 PMA supplements.
* * * * *
(h) The application must include the following information, if
readily available:
(1) A description of any pediatric subpopulations (neonates,
infants, children, adolescents) that suffer from the disease or
condition that the device is intended to treat, diagnose, or cure; and
(2) The number of affected pediatric patients who are 21 years of
age or younger.
(3) If information concerning the device that is the subject of the
supplement was previously submitted under Sec. 814.20(b)(3)(i), that
information may be incorporated by reference to the application or
submission that contains
[[Page 16370]]
the information. However, if additional information required under
Sec. 814.20(b)(3)(i) has become readily available to the applicant
since the previous submission, the applicant must submit that
information as part of the supplement.
7. In Sec. 814.44, redesignate paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) through
(e)(1)(iv) as paragraphs (e)(1)(iii) through (e)(1)(v), respectively,
and add new paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.44 Procedures for review of a PMA.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The submission of additional information concerning potential
pediatric uses required by Sec. 814.20(b)(3)(i) that is readily
available to the applicant;
* * * * *
8. Amend Sec. 814.100 as follows:
a. Redesignate paragraphs (b) through (e) as paragraphs (d) through
(g), respectively;
b. Redesignate paragraph (a) as paragraph (b), and remove the first
sentence of redesignated paragraph (b); and
c. Add new paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.100 Purpose and scope.
(a) This subpart H implements sections 515A and 520(m) of the act.
* * * * *
(c) Section 515A of the act is intended to ensure the submission of
readily available information concerning actual and potential pediatric
uses of medical devices.
* * * * *
9. Amend Sec. 814.104 as follows:
a. Revise the last sentence of paragraph (b)(4)(ii);
b. Revise the last sentence of paragraph (b)(5); and
c. Add paragraph (b)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.104 Original applications.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * * The effectiveness of this device for this use has not
been demonstrated.
(5) * * * If the amount charged is $250 or less, the requirement
for a report by an independent certified public accountant or an
attestation by a responsible individual of the organization is waived;
and
(6) Readily available information concerning actual and potential
pediatric uses of the device, as required by Sec. 814.20(b)(3)(i).
* * * * *
10. In Sec. 814.116, redesignate paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(4)
as paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(5), respectively, and add new
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 814.116 Procedures for review of an HDE.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The submission of additional information concerning potential
pediatric uses required by Sec. 814.20(b)(3)(i) that is readily
available to the applicant;
* * * * *
Dated: March 17, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-7192 Filed 3-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S