Arizona Public Service Company, et al. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Exemption, 15745-15746 [2010-7029]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notwithstanding the schedule
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee will continue
to be in compliance with all other
applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRCapproved physical security program. By
October 5, 2011, FCS will be in full
compliance with all the regulatory
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued
on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee’s
submittals and concludes that the
licensee has justified its request for an
extension of the compliance date with
regard to three specified requirements of
10 CFR 73.55 until October 5, 2011.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ exemption
from the March 31, 2010, compliance
date is authorized by law and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and is otherwise
in the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The NRC has determined that the
long-term benefits, that will be realized
when the FCS modifications are
complete, justify extending the full
compliance date in the case of this
particular licensee. The significant
security measures for which FCS needs
additional time to complete are new
requirements imposed by March 27,
2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and
are in addition to those required by the
security orders issued in response to the
events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, the NRC concludes that the
licensee’s actions are in the best interest
of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that
will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
deadline for the three items specified in
the Attachments to FCS’s letters dated
December 31, 2009, and January 21,
2010, the licensee is required to be in
full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55 by
October 5, 2011. In achieving
compliance, the licensee is reminded
that it is responsible for determining the
appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e.,
10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for
incorporation of all necessary changes
to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Mar 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
human environment [75 FR 10835;
March 9, 2010].
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7025 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. STN 50–528, STN 50–529, and
STN 50–530 NRC–2010–0114]
Arizona Public Service Company, et al.
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station,
Units 1, 2, and 3; Exemption
1.0
Background
The Arizona Public Service Company
(APS, the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–41,
NPF–51, and NPF–74, which authorize
operation of the Palo Verde Nuclear
Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1, 2,
and 3, respectively. The licenses
provide, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
or the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of three
pressurized-water reactors located in
Maricopa County, Arizona.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published in the
Federal Register on March 27, 2009,
effective May 26, 2009, with a full
implementation date of March 31, 2010,
requires licensees to protect, with high
assurance, against radiological sabotage
by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security programs.
The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
published on March 27, 2009 (74 FR
13926), establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001,
and implemented by the licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15745
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post-September
11, 2001, security orders. It is from two
of these additional requirements that
APS now seeks an exemption from the
March 31, 2010, implementation date.
All other physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March
31, 2010.
By letter dated December 21, 2009, as
supplemented by letters dated February
16 and March 5, 2010, the licensee
requested an exemption in accordance
with 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
exemptions.’’ The licensee’s letters can
be found in the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS), at Accession Nos.
ML100040088, ML100550875, and
ML100680760, respectively. The
licensee’s letters dated December 21,
2009, and March 5, 2010, contain
security-related information and,
accordingly, those portions of the letters
are being withheld from public
disclosure. The licensee has requested
an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date stating that a
number of issues will present a
significant challenge to the timely
completion of the projects related to
certain specific requirements in 10 CFR
Part 73. Specifically, the request is to
extend the implementation date from
the current March 31, 2010, deadline to
June 30, 2010, for one specified item,
and to December 17, 2010, for the
second specified item. Granting this
exemption for the two items would
allow the licensee to complete the
modifications designed to update aging
equipment and incorporate state-of-theart technology to meet the noted
regulatory requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
Part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR Part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
15746
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 30, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
NRC approval of this exemption, as
noted above, would allow an extension
of the implementation date from March
31, 2010, to June 30, 2010, for one
specific requirement to December 17,
2010, for the second specific
requirement of the new rule. As stated
above, 10 CFR 73.5 allows the NRC to
grant exemptions from the requirements
of 10 CFR Part 73. The NRC staff has
determined that granting the licensee’s
proposed exemption would not result in
a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the Commission’s
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is
authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor
security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed
that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180
days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new
requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From
this, it is clear that the Commission
wanted to provide a reasonable
timeframe for licensees to achieve full
compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a generic industry request to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date as
documented in a letter from R.W.
Borchardt, (NRC), to M.S. Fertel,
(Nuclear Energy Institute) dated June 4,
2009. The licensee’s request for an
exemption is therefore consistent with
the approach set forth by the
Commission and discussed in the June
4, 2009, letter.
PVNGS Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information in the enclosure to its letter
dated December 21, 2009, requesting an
exemption, and provided further
clarification in its letters dated February
16 and March 5, 2010. In those letters,
the licensee described a comprehensive
plan to study, design, construct, test,
and turn over the new equipment for the
enhancement of the security capabilities
at the PVNGS site and provided a
timeline for achieving full compliance
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Mar 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
with the new regulation. The licensee’s
letters dated December 21, 2009, and
March 5, 2010, contain security-related
information regarding the site security
plan, details of the specific
requirements of the regulation for which
the site cannot achieve compliance by
the March 31, 2010, deadline,
justification for the extension request, a
description of the required changes to
the site’s security configuration, and a
detailed timeline with critical path
activities that would enable the licensee
to achieve full compliance by December
17, 2010. The timeline provides dates
indicating when (1) construction will
begin on various phases of the project,
(2) outages are scheduled for each unit,
and (3) critical equipment will be
ordered, installed, tested and become
operational.
Notwithstanding the schedule
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee would
continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security
requirements, as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRCapproved physical security program. By
December 17, 2010, PVNGS would be in
full compliance with the regulatory
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued
on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee’s
submittals and concludes that the
licensee has provided adequate
justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to June
30, 2010, and to December 17, 2010,
respectively, for two specified
requirements.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property or
the common defense and security, and
is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants the requested exemption.
The NRC staff has determined that the
long-term benefits that will be realized
when the PVNGS security modifications
are completed justify exceeding the full
compliance date with regard to the
specified requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
The significant security enhancements
PVNGS needs additional time to
complete are new requirements imposed
by March 27, 2009, amendments to 10
CFR 73.55, and are in addition to those
required by the security orders issued in
response to the events of September 11,
2001. Therefore, the NRC concludes that
the licensee’s actions are in the best
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interest of protecting the public health
and safety through the security changes
that will result from granting this
exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
deadline for the two items specified in
the enclosure to the APS letter dated
December 21, 2009, as supplemented by
the APS letters dated February 16 and
March 5, 2010, the licensee is required
to be in full compliance by December
17, 2010. In achieving compliance, the
licensee is reminded that it is
responsible for determining the
appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e.,
10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for
incorporation of all necessary changes
to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 13606;
dated March 22, 2010). This exemption
is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of March 2010.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–7029 Filed 3–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–382; NRC–2010–0110]
Entergy Operations, Inc., Waterford
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3;
Exemption
1.0 Background
Entergy Operations, Inc. (the
licensee), is the holder of Facility
Operating License No. NPF–38 which
authorizes operation of the Waterford
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3
(Waterford 3). The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of one
pressurized-water reactor located in St.
Charles Parish, Louisiana.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15745-15746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, and STN 50-530 NRC-2010-0114]
Arizona Public Service Company, et al. Palo Verde Nuclear
Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Exemption
1.0 Background
The Arizona Public Service Company (APS, the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51, and NPF-74,
which authorize operation of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
(PVNGS), Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The licenses provide, among
other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations,
and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, or the
Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of three pressurized-water reactors located
in Maricopa County, Arizona.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' Section 73.55,
``Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in
nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage,'' published in
the Federal Register on March 27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with a
full implementation date of March 31, 2010, requires licensees to
protect, with high assurance, against radiological sabotage by
designing and implementing comprehensive site security programs. The
amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926),
establish and update generically applicable security requirements
similar to those previously imposed by Commission orders issued after
the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, and implemented by the
licensees. In addition, the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 include
additional requirements to further enhance site security based upon
insights gained from implementation of the post-September 11, 2001,
security orders. It is from two of these additional requirements that
APS now seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation
date. All other physical security requirements established by this
recent rulemaking have already been or will be implemented by the
licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated December 21, 2009, as supplemented by letters dated
February 16 and March 5, 2010, the licensee requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.'' The licensee's
letters can be found in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS), at Accession Nos. ML100040088, ML100550875, and
ML100680760, respectively. The licensee's letters dated December 21,
2009, and March 5, 2010, contain security-related information and,
accordingly, those portions of the letters are being withheld from
public disclosure. The licensee has requested an exemption from the
March 31, 2010, implementation date stating that a number of issues
will present a significant challenge to the timely completion of the
projects related to certain specific requirements in 10 CFR Part 73.
Specifically, the request is to extend the implementation date from the
current March 31, 2010, deadline to June 30, 2010, for one specified
item, and to December 17, 2010, for the second specified item. Granting
this exemption for the two items would allow the licensee to complete
the modifications designed to update aging equipment and incorporate
state-of-the-art technology to meet the noted regulatory requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ``By March 31, 2010, each nuclear
power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR Part 50, shall implement
the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards
Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as `security plans.' '' Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part
73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
[[Page 15746]]
NRC approval of this exemption, as noted above, would allow an
extension of the implementation date from March 31, 2010, to June 30,
2010, for one specific requirement to December 17, 2010, for the second
specific requirement of the new rule. As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5
allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part
73. The NRC staff has determined that granting the licensee's proposed
exemption would not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The Commission directed a change
from 180 days to approximately 1 year for licensees to fully implement
the new requirements. This change was incorporated into the final rule.
From this, it is clear that the Commission wanted to provide a
reasonable timeframe for licensees to achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct site-specific analyses to determine
what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and
that changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing
mechanisms, including exemptions. Since issuance of the final rule, the
Commission has rejected a generic industry request to extend the rule's
compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that
the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance
date as documented in a letter from R.W. Borchardt, (NRC), to M.S.
Fertel, (Nuclear Energy Institute) dated June 4, 2009. The licensee's
request for an exemption is therefore consistent with the approach set
forth by the Commission and discussed in the June 4, 2009, letter.
PVNGS Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed information in the enclosure to its
letter dated December 21, 2009, requesting an exemption, and provided
further clarification in its letters dated February 16 and March 5,
2010. In those letters, the licensee described a comprehensive plan to
study, design, construct, test, and turn over the new equipment for the
enhancement of the security capabilities at the PVNGS site and provided
a timeline for achieving full compliance with the new regulation. The
licensee's letters dated December 21, 2009, and March 5, 2010, contain
security-related information regarding the site security plan, details
of the specific requirements of the regulation for which the site
cannot achieve compliance by the March 31, 2010, deadline,
justification for the extension request, a description of the required
changes to the site's security configuration, and a detailed timeline
with critical path activities that would enable the licensee to achieve
full compliance by December 17, 2010. The timeline provides dates
indicating when (1) construction will begin on various phases of the
project, (2) outages are scheduled for each unit, and (3) critical
equipment will be ordered, installed, tested and become operational.
Notwithstanding the schedule exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee would continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security requirements, as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC-approved physical security
program. By December 17, 2010, PVNGS would be in full compliance with
the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27,
2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and concludes that
the licensee has provided adequate justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to June 30, 2010, and to December 17,
2010, respectively, for two specified requirements.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The NRC staff has determined that the long-term benefits that will
be realized when the PVNGS security modifications are completed justify
exceeding the full compliance date with regard to the specified
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55. The significant security enhancements
PVNGS needs additional time to complete are new requirements imposed by
March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are in addition to
those required by the security orders issued in response to the events
of September 11, 2001. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the licensee's
actions are in the best interest of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that will result from granting this
exemption.
As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to
grant an exemption from the March 31, 2010, deadline for the two items
specified in the enclosure to the APS letter dated December 21, 2009,
as supplemented by the APS letters dated February 16 and March 5, 2010,
the licensee is required to be in full compliance by December 17, 2010.
In achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded that it is
responsible for determining the appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e.,
10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all necessary
changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact,'' the
Commission has previously determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 13606; dated March 22, 2010). This exemption
is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of March 2010.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-7029 Filed 3-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P