Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Removing Requirement for Prior Approval for Certain Proposals to Foreign Persons Relating to Significant Military Equipment, 15388-15389 [2010-6905]
Download as PDF
15388
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules
submitted comments, please organize
your comments based on the major
categories of requirements included in
the current VFD regulation at 21 CFR
558.6. These categories of requirements
are listed following this paragraph. (See
A through F.) If your comment
addresses an issue outside of one of
these categories, please categorize your
comment as G. ‘‘Other:’’
A. Conditions that must be met by
veterinarians issuing a VFD;
B. What veterinarians must do with a
VFD (e.g., disposition of original VFD
and copies);
C. Records that must be kept related
to the VFDs;
D. Notification requirements for
distributors of animal feeds containing a
VFD drug;
E. Additional recordkeeping
requirements that apply to distributors;
F. Cautionary statements required for
VFD drugs and animal feeds containing
VFD drugs; and
G. Other.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 24, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–6872 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 124, 126, and 129
[Public Notice: 6931]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1400–AC62
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Removing
Requirement for Prior Approval for
Certain Proposals to Foreign Persons
Relating to Significant Military
Equipment
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State is
amending the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Mar 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements for prior approval or prior
notification for certain proposals to
foreign persons relating to significant
military equipment at section 126.8 of
the ITAR.
DATES: Effective Date: The Department
of State will accept comments on this
proposed rule until May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments within 60 days of the
date of the publication by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail:
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an
appropriate subject line.
• Mail: Department of State,
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
ATTN: Regulatory Change, Section
126.8, SA–1, 12th Floor, Washington,
DC 20522–0112.
• Persons with access to the Internet
may also view this notice by going to
the U.S. Government regulations.gov
Web site at https://regulations.gov/
index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, Telephone (202)
663–2803 or Fax (202) 261–8199; E-mail
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Section 126.8.
Effective
September 1, 1977, the Department of
State amended the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) at 22 CFR
123.16, to require Department of State
approval before a proposal or
presentation is made that is designed to
constitute the basis for a decision to
purchase significant combat equipment,
involving the export of an item on the
U.S. Munitions List, valued at
$7,000,000 or more for use by the armed
forces of a foreign country (42 FR 41631,
dated August 18, 1977). Also, 22 CFR
124.06, entitled ‘‘Approval of proposals
for technical assistance and
manufacturing license agreements,’’ was
amended to require similar prior
approval requirements with respect to
proposals and presentations for
technical assistance and manufacturing
license agreements involving the
production or assembly of significant
combat equipment.
‘‘Proposals to foreign persons relating
to significant military equipment’’
became section 126.8 in a final rule
effective January 1, 1985 (49 FR 47682,
dated December 6, 1984). Section 126.8
did not require prior approval of the
Department of State when the proposed
sale was to the armed forces of a
member of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), Australia, Japan,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or New Zealand, except with respect to
manufacturing license agreements or
technical assistance agreements.
A prior notification requirement,
instead of prior approval, was added to
section 126.8 in a final rule effective
March 31, 1985 (50 FR 12787, dated
April 1, 1985). Prior notification to the
Department of State was required 30
days in advance of a proposal or
presentation to any foreign person
where such proposals or presentations
concern equipment previously approved
for export.
The current section 126.8 requires
prior approval or prior notification for
certain proposals and presentations to
make a determination whether to
purchase significant military equipment
valued at $14,000,000 or more (other
than a member of NATO, Australia,
New Zealand, Japan, or South Korea), or
whether to enter into a manufacturing
license agreement or technical
assistance agreement for the production
or assembly of significant military
equipment, regardless of dollar value.
These types of proposals and
presentations usually involve large
dollar amounts. Before the defense
industry undertakes the effort involved
in formulating its proposals and
presentations, if there is any doubt that
the corresponding license application or
proposed agreement would not be
authorized by the Department of State,
the industry may request an advisory
opinion (See 22 CFR 126.9). The written
advisory opinion, though not binding on
the Department, helps inform the
defense industry whether the
Department would likely grant a license
application or proposed agreement.
Currently, the time between submitting
a license application or proposed
agreement and obtaining a decision
from the Department of State whether to
authorize such transactions has been
decreased sufficiently that requiring
prior approval or prior notification for
proposals is unnecessary and imposes
an administrative burden on industry.
References to § 126.8 have been
removed at §§ 124.1(a), 126.13, and
129.8(c).
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed amendment involves a
foreign affairs function of the United
States and, therefore, is not subject to
the procedures contained in 5 U.S.C.
553 and 554.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this proposed amendment
involves a foreign affairs function of the
United States, it does not require
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not
involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
22 CFR Parts 124 and 129
Arms and munitions, Exports,
Technical assistance.
22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, parts 124, 126, and 129 are proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 124—AGREEMENTS, OFFSHORE PROCUREMENT AND OTHER
DEFENSE SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 124
is revised to read as follows:
15389
approving the provision of defense
services described in § 120.9(a) of this
subchapter by granting a license under
part 125 of this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
3. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42 and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C.
2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR
28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225,
Pub. L. 108–375.
§ 126.8
[Removed and Reserved]
This proposed amendment has been
found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C.
2776; Pub. L. 105–261.
4. Section 126.8 is removed and
reserved.
5. Section 126.13 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
2. Section 124.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 126.13
This proposed amendment will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed amendment is exempt
from review under Executive Order
12866, but has been reviewed internally
by the Department of State to ensure
consistency with the purposes thereof.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirement of section
5 of Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed amendment does not
impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Mar 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 124.1 Manufacturing license agreements
and technical assistance agreements.
(a) Approval. The approval of the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
must be obtained before the defense
services described in § 120.9(a) of this
subchapter may be furnished. In order
to obtain such approval, the U.S. person
must submit a proposed agreement to
the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls. Such agreements are generally
characterized as manufacturing license
agreements, technical assistance
agreements, distribution agreements, or
off-shore procurement agreements, and
may not enter into force without the
prior written approval of the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls. Once
approved, the defense services
described in the agreements may
generally be provided without further
licensing in accordance with §§ 124.3
and 125.4(b)(2) of this subchapter. The
requirements of this section apply
whether or not technical data is to be
disclosed or used in the performance of
the defense services described in
§ 120.9(a) of this subchapter (e.g., all the
information relied upon by the U.S.
person in performing the defense
service is in the public domain or is
otherwise exempt from licensing
requirements of this subchapter
pursuant to § 125.4 of this subchapter).
This requirement also applies to the
training of any foreign military forces,
regular and irregular, in the use of
defense articles. Technical assistance
agreements must be submitted in such
cases. In exceptional cases, the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
upon written request, will consider
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Required information.
(a) All applications for licenses (DSP–
5, DSP–61, DSP–73, and DSP–85), all
requests for approval of agreements and
amendments thereto under part 124 of
this subchapter, and all requests for
written authorizations must include a
letter signed by a responsible official
empowered by the applicant and
addressed to the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, stating whether:
*
*
*
*
*
PART 129—REGISTRATION AND
LICENSING OF BROKERS
6. The authority citation for part 129
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 38, Pub. L. 104–164, 110
Stat. 1437, (22 U.S.C. 2778).
§ 129.8
[Amended]
7. Section 129.8 is amended by
removing paragraph (c).
Dated: March 3, 2010.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–6905 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR CHAPTER VI
No Child Left Behind School Facilities
and Construction Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee Meeting
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 59 (Monday, March 29, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15388-15389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6905]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 124, 126, and 129
[Public Notice: 6931]
RIN 1400-AC62
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Removing Requirement for Prior Approval for Certain Proposals to
Foreign Persons Relating to Significant Military Equipment
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove the requirements for prior
approval or prior notification for certain proposals to foreign persons
relating to significant military equipment at section 126.8 of the
ITAR.
DATES: Effective Date: The Department of State will accept comments on
this proposed rule until May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments within 60 days of the
date of the publication by any of the following methods:
E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an appropriate
subject line.
Mail: Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, ATTN: Regulatory
Change, Section 126.8, SA-1, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0112.
Persons with access to the Internet may also view this
notice by going to the U.S. Government regulations.gov Web site at
https://regulations.gov/index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, Telephone (202)
663-2803 or Fax (202) 261-8199; E-mail DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, Section 126.8.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective September 1, 1977, the Department
of State amended the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)
at 22 CFR 123.16, to require Department of State approval before a
proposal or presentation is made that is designed to constitute the
basis for a decision to purchase significant combat equipment,
involving the export of an item on the U.S. Munitions List, valued at
$7,000,000 or more for use by the armed forces of a foreign country (42
FR 41631, dated August 18, 1977). Also, 22 CFR 124.06, entitled
``Approval of proposals for technical assistance and manufacturing
license agreements,'' was amended to require similar prior approval
requirements with respect to proposals and presentations for technical
assistance and manufacturing license agreements involving the
production or assembly of significant combat equipment.
``Proposals to foreign persons relating to significant military
equipment'' became section 126.8 in a final rule effective January 1,
1985 (49 FR 47682, dated December 6, 1984). Section 126.8 did not
require prior approval of the Department of State when the proposed
sale was to the armed forces of a member of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), Australia, Japan, or New Zealand, except with
respect to manufacturing license agreements or technical assistance
agreements.
A prior notification requirement, instead of prior approval, was
added to section 126.8 in a final rule effective March 31, 1985 (50 FR
12787, dated April 1, 1985). Prior notification to the Department of
State was required 30 days in advance of a proposal or presentation to
any foreign person where such proposals or presentations concern
equipment previously approved for export.
The current section 126.8 requires prior approval or prior
notification for certain proposals and presentations to make a
determination whether to purchase significant military equipment valued
at $14,000,000 or more (other than a member of NATO, Australia, New
Zealand, Japan, or South Korea), or whether to enter into a
manufacturing license agreement or technical assistance agreement for
the production or assembly of significant military equipment,
regardless of dollar value.
These types of proposals and presentations usually involve large
dollar amounts. Before the defense industry undertakes the effort
involved in formulating its proposals and presentations, if there is
any doubt that the corresponding license application or proposed
agreement would not be authorized by the Department of State, the
industry may request an advisory opinion (See 22 CFR 126.9). The
written advisory opinion, though not binding on the Department, helps
inform the defense industry whether the Department would likely grant a
license application or proposed agreement. Currently, the time between
submitting a license application or proposed agreement and obtaining a
decision from the Department of State whether to authorize such
transactions has been decreased sufficiently that requiring prior
approval or prior notification for proposals is unnecessary and imposes
an administrative burden on industry.
References to Sec. 126.8 have been removed at Sec. Sec. 124.1(a),
126.13, and 129.8(c).
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed amendment involves a foreign affairs function of the
United States and, therefore, is not subject to the procedures
contained in 5 U.S.C. 553 and 554.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this proposed amendment involves a foreign affairs function
of the United States, it does not require
[[Page 15389]]
analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not involve a mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been found not to be a major rule
within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this amendment does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed amendment is exempt from review under Executive Order
12866, but has been reviewed internally by the Department of State to
ensure consistency with the purposes thereof.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirement of section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed amendment does not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects
22 CFR Parts 124 and 129
Arms and munitions, Exports, Technical assistance.
22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, parts 124, 126, and 129 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 124--AGREEMENTS, OFF-SHORE PROCUREMENT AND OTHER DEFENSE
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 124 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744
(22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; Pub. L. 105-261.
2. Section 124.1 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 124.1 Manufacturing license agreements and technical assistance
agreements.
(a) Approval. The approval of the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls must be obtained before the defense services described in
Sec. 120.9(a) of this subchapter may be furnished. In order to obtain
such approval, the U.S. person must submit a proposed agreement to the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Such agreements are generally
characterized as manufacturing license agreements, technical assistance
agreements, distribution agreements, or off-shore procurement
agreements, and may not enter into force without the prior written
approval of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Once approved,
the defense services described in the agreements may generally be
provided without further licensing in accordance with Sec. Sec. 124.3
and 125.4(b)(2) of this subchapter. The requirements of this section
apply whether or not technical data is to be disclosed or used in the
performance of the defense services described in Sec. 120.9(a) of this
subchapter (e.g., all the information relied upon by the U.S. person in
performing the defense service is in the public domain or is otherwise
exempt from licensing requirements of this subchapter pursuant to Sec.
125.4 of this subchapter). This requirement also applies to the
training of any foreign military forces, regular and irregular, in the
use of defense articles. Technical assistance agreements must be
submitted in such cases. In exceptional cases, the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, upon written request, will consider approving
the provision of defense services described in Sec. 120.9(a) of this
subchapter by granting a license under part 125 of this subchapter.
* * * * *
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
3. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42 and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat.
744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791 and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c;
E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225, Pub.
L. 108-375.
Sec. 126.8 [Removed and Reserved]
4. Section 126.8 is removed and reserved.
5. Section 126.13 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 126.13 Required information.
(a) All applications for licenses (DSP-5, DSP-61, DSP-73, and DSP-
85), all requests for approval of agreements and amendments thereto
under part 124 of this subchapter, and all requests for written
authorizations must include a letter signed by a responsible official
empowered by the applicant and addressed to the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, stating whether:
* * * * *
PART 129--REGISTRATION AND LICENSING OF BROKERS
6. The authority citation for part 129 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 38, Pub. L. 104-164, 110 Stat. 1437, (22 U.S.C.
2778).
Sec. 129.8 [Amended]
7. Section 129.8 is amended by removing paragraph (c).
Dated: March 3, 2010.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-6905 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P