Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 15461-15462 [2010-6883]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices
comments concerning the proposed use
of this new form to the NTSB Desk
Officer at the OMB.
DATES: Submit written comments
regarding this proposed collection of
information by May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Respondents may submit
written comments on the collection of
information to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of
Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for the National
Transportation Safety Board,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Dunham, NTSB Office of Aviation
Safety, at (202) 314–6387.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with OMB regulations that
require this Notice for proposed ICRs,
the NTSB seeks to notify the public that
it may submit comments on this
proposed ICR to OMB. 5 CFR
1320.10(a).
The proposed form that the NTSB
seeks to use will obtain information
from operators who, had they not
complied with an RA, would have
encountered a substantial risk of
collision with another aircraft, or who
received an RA while operating in class
A airspace. The NTSB’s purpose in
proposing to use a new form is to allow
operators to avoid completing the
NTSB’s lengthier form in which the
NTSB obtains a variety of information
concerning an accident or incident
(Form 6120.1), when completion of the
lengthier form is unnecessary. The
proposed new form will solicit the
following information: (1) Confirmation
that the incident to be reported falls
under the scope of the rule; (2) contact
information, such as the submitter’s
name, company (if any), e-mail address,
and telephone number; (3) information
about the flight and aircraft, such as the
call sign, type of aircraft, location and
time of the occurrence, and altitude at
which the aircraft experienced the RA;
(4) information about the ATC services
being provided to the aircraft when the
RA occurred, such as the ATC facility
name and communications frequency in
use; and (5) a brief description of the RA
type and circumstances of the incident.
For the convenience of operators who
submit reports of RAs, the NTSB plans
to provide the form on the NTSB Web
site. The NTSB’s purpose in creating
this Web-based form is to provide a
convenient way in which submitters
may comply with a portion of the
NTSB’s new regulations, which became
effective on March 8, 2010, 75 FR 922–
01 (Jan. 7, 2010). In particular, 49 CFR
830.5(a)(10) now requires reports of the
following: ‘‘Airborne Collision and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
09:18 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Avoidance System (ACAS) resolution
advisories issued either: When an
aircraft is being operated on an
instrument flight rules flight plan and
compliance with the advisory is
necessary to avert a substantial risk of
collision between two or more aircraft;
or to an aircraft operating in class A
airspace.’’ The NTSB notes that this new
regulation does not require reports of
RAs unless compliance with the RA is
necessary to avoid a substantial risk of
collision between two or more aircraft,
or unless an aircraft receives an RA
while operating in class A airspace.
Therefore, before being allowed to
continue, the submitter will be asked to
confirm that the proposed report
involves an incident that falls within
the scope of the rule. Once a submitter
completes the form, the NTSB may
contact the submitter and may consider
asking the submitter to complete NTSB
Form 6120.1, if the NTSB determines
that it needs additional information.
The NTSB also notes that
respondents’ completion of the form is
optional, because respondents may call
the NTSB Communications Center or an
NTSB field office if they prefer to notify
the NTSB via telephone. The form will
only be available on the NTSB Web site,
and the NTSB has carefully reviewed
the form to ensure that it has used plain,
coherent, and unambiguous terminology
in its requests for information. The form
is not duplicative of another agency’s
collection of information. The NTSB
believes this proposed form, given its
brevity, will impose a minimal burden
on respondents: the NTSB estimates that
respondents will spend approximately
10 minutes in completing the form. The
NTSB estimates that approximately 20
respondents per year will complete the
form.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
Candi Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–6818 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2010–0113]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to the Office of Management and
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15461
Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public
comment.
SUMMARY: The NRC invites public
comment about our intention to request
the OMB’s approval for renewal of an
existing information collection that is
summarized below. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: NRC Form 314, Certificate of
Disposition of Materials.
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0028.
3. How often the collection is
required: This form is submitted once,
when a licensee terminates its license.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
Persons holding a NRC license for the
possession and use of radioactive
byproduct, source, or special nuclear
material that are ceasing licensed
activities and terminating the license.
5. The number of annual respondents:
136.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 68.
7. Abstract: The NRC Form 314
furnishes information to the NRC
regarding transfer or other disposition of
radioactive material by licensees who
wish to terminate their licenses. The
information is used by the NRC as part
of the basis for its determination that the
facility has been cleared of radioactive
material before the facility is released
for unrestricted use.
Submit, by May 28, 2010, comments
that address the following questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. OMB clearance
requests are available at the NRC
worldwide Web site: https://
www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doccomment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
15462
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Notices
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice. Comments
submitted in writing or in electronic
form will be made available for public
inspection. Because your comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information, the NRC
cautions you against including any
information in your submission that you
do not want to be publicly disclosed.
Comments submitted should reference
Docket No. NRC–2010–0113. You may
submit your comments by any of the
following methods. Electronic
comments: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
Docket No. NRC–2010–0113. Mail
comments to NRC Clearance Officer,
Tremaine Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001. Questions
about the information collection
requirements may be directed to the
NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine
Donnell (T–5 F53), U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, by telephone at 301–
415–6258, or by e-mail to
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–6883 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–387 and 50–388; NRC–
2010–0109]
PPL Susquehanna, LLC; Susquehanna
Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2;
Exemption
cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
1.0
Background
PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL or the
licensee) is the holder of Renewed
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–14
and NPF–22, which authorize operation
of the Susquehanna Steam Electric
Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2. The
licenses provide, among other things,
that the facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of two boilingwater reactors located in Luzerne
County, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
09:18 Apr 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 73,
‘‘PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLANTS
AND MATERIALS,’’ section 73.55,
‘‘Requirements for physical protection of
licensed activities in nuclear power
reactors against radiological sabotage,’’
published March 27, 2009, effective
May 26, 2009, with a full
implementation date of March 31, 2010,
requires licensees to protect, with high
assurance, against radiological sabotage
by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security programs.
The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
published on March 27, 2009, establish
and update generically applicable
security requirements similar to those
previously imposed by Commission
orders issued after the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, and
implemented by licensees. In addition,
the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
include additional requirements to
further enhance site security based upon
insights gained from implementation of
the post-September 11, 2001, security
orders. It is from three of these new
requirements that PPL now seeks an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical
security requirements established by
this recent rulemaking have already
been or will be implemented by the
licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated December 3, 2009, as
supplemented by letters dated January 8
and 29, 2010, the licensee requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions.’’ The
portions of the licensee’s letters dated
December 3, 2009, as supplemented by
letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010,
contain sensitive security information
and accordingly are withheld from
public disclosure in accordance with 10
CFR 2.390. The licensee has requested
an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date, stating that it must
complete a number of significant
modifications to the current site security
configuration before all requirements
can be met. Specifically, the request is
to extend the compliance date for one
specific requirement to October 29,
2010, and until July 31, 2011, for two
other requirements from the current
March 31, 2010, deadline. Being granted
this exemption for the three items
would allow the licensee to complete
the modifications designed to update
aging equipment and incorporate stateof-the-art technology to meet or exceed
the noted regulatory requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
This NRC approval of the exemption
as noted above, would allow an
extension of implementation date in the
new rule from March 31, 2010, to
October 29, 2010, for one specific
requirement and until July 31, 2011, for
two other requirements. As stated
above, 10 CFR 73.5 allows the NRC to
grant exemptions from the requirements
of 10 CFR part 73. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the
licensee’s proposed exemption would
not result in a violation of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the NRC approval of the licensee’s
exemption request is authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor
security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed
that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180
days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new
requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From
this, it is clear that the Commission
wanted to provide a reasonable
timeframe for licensees to achieve full
compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a generic industry request to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 59 (Monday, March 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15461-15462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6883]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC-2010-0113]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
solicitation of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC invites public comment about our intention to request
the OMB's approval for renewal of an existing information collection
that is summarized below. We are required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information collection: NRC Form 314,
Certificate of Disposition of Materials.
2. Current OMB approval number: 3150-0028.
3. How often the collection is required: This form is submitted
once, when a licensee terminates its license.
4. Who is required or asked to report: Persons holding a NRC
license for the possession and use of radioactive byproduct, source, or
special nuclear material that are ceasing licensed activities and
terminating the license.
5. The number of annual respondents: 136.
6. The number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement
or request: 68.
7. Abstract: The NRC Form 314 furnishes information to the NRC
regarding transfer or other disposition of radioactive material by
licensees who wish to terminate their licenses. The information is used
by the NRC as part of the basis for its determination that the facility
has been cleared of radioactive material before the facility is
released for unrestricted use.
Submit, by May 28, 2010, comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC
to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical
utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting statement may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, Maryland 20852. OMB clearance
requests are available at the NRC worldwide Web site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/. The document
will be available on the NRC
[[Page 15462]]
home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice.
Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be made
available for public inspection. Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC
cautions you against including any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly disclosed. Comments submitted should
reference Docket No. NRC-2010-0113. You may submit your comments by any
of the following methods. Electronic comments: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket No. NRC-2010-0113. Mail
comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Questions
about the information collection requirements may be directed to the
NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by telephone at 301-
415-6258, or by e-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tremaine Donnell,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-6883 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P