Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of Protections for the Grizzly Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in Compliance With Court Order, 14496-14498 [2010-6802]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
14496
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Classification
PART 1352—[CORRECTED]
48 CFR Part 1352
Executive Order 12866: This rule has
been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Department finds
good cause to waive prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
otherwise required by the section
because it is unnecessary. The
Department takes this action to correct
an error in the headings that appear for
each clause in subpart 1352.2. In the
final rule published on March 8, 2010,
the Department included a reference to
‘‘DATE’’ in each clause heading in
subpart 1352 to serve as a placeholder
for the month and year when the rule is
published so that each clause may have
a reference point. This placeholder was
inadvertently retained rather than
updated with the month and year of the
final rule when the rule becomes
effective. This final rule corrects this
typographical error by adding the month
and year when the rule is to become
effective, which is April 2010. This
amendment is a purely technical, nonsubstantive change to the regulations.
No aspect of this action is controversial.
This rule does not change any
procurement practices or procedures
made by the March 8, 2010 rule. The
error should be corrected immediately
to eliminate potential confusion by the
regulated public.
For the reasons stated above, the
Department finds good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day
delay in effective date.
Because prior notice and opportunity
for public comment are not required for
this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
law, the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This rule
does not impose any new information
collections subject to review and
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. Notwithstanding any
other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any
person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of
information subject to the requirements
of PRA, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
In FR Doc. 2010–4132 appearing on
page 10568 in the Federal Register of
Monday, March 8, 2010, the following
corrections are made:
■
[Document Number: 080730954–0129–03]
RIN 0605–AA26
Commerce Acquisition Regulation
(CAR); Correction
AGENCY:
Department of Commerce
(DOC).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: We, the Department of
Commerce, issue a final rule to bring the
Commerce Acquisition Regulation in
alignment with the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) and to streamline
DOC’s internal policy and guidance.
DATES: This rule is effective April 7,
2010.
The final rule is available
on the DOC Web site https://
www.doc.gov, or https://
www.regulations.gov, or by contacting
the Department of Commerce: Room
1854, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Virna Evans, 202–482–3483.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
8, 2010, the Department of Commerce
published a final rule to amend the CAR
to update the regulations since its last
revision on September 12, 1995. That
rule updated the CAR to bring it into
alignment with the current provisions of
the FAR and added numerous new
clauses that correspond to the new
procedural requirements added to the
CAR. For a detailed description of the
changes by CAR Part, see the final rule
published on March 8, 2010 in the
Federal Register (75 FR 10568). The
document is also available at https://
www.Regulations.gov under Docket
Number: DOC–2009–0003–0001.
Upon publication of the regulations,
the Department identified a
typographical error in the clause
headings that appear in subpart 1352.2.
In each clause heading, the Department
included a reference to ‘‘DATE’’ to serve
as a placeholder for the month and year
when the rule is published so that each
clause may have a reference point.
However, this placeholder was not
updated before the final rule was
published. This final rule corrects this
typographical error by adding to each
clause heading the month and year
when the clause is effective, which is
April 2010. This amendment is a purely
technical, non-substantive change to the
regulations. No aspect of this action is
controversial.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On pages 10594 through 10616, in
part 1352, correct the clause heading of
each section by revising each reference
to ‘‘(DATE)’’ to read ‘‘(APR 2010)’’.
Dated: March 17, 2010.
Scott Quehl,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–6730 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2010–0021;
92220–1113–0000; C6]
RIN 1018–AW97
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Reinstatement of
Protections for the Grizzly Bear in the
Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in
Compliance With Court Order
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) are issuing
this final rule to comply with a court
order that has the effect of reinstating
the regulatory protections under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA),
as amended, for the grizzly bear (Ursus
arctos horribilis) in the Greater
Yellowstone Area (GYA) and
surrounding area. This rule corrects the
grizzly bear listing to reinstate the
listing of grizzly bears in the GYA. This
final rule also takes administrative
action to correct two associated special
rules.
DATES: This action is effective March 26,
2010. However, the court order had
legal effect immediately upon being
filed on September 21, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear
Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, at our Missoula office
(see ADDRESSES above) or telephone
(406) 243–4903. Individuals who are
hearing-impaired or speech-impaired
may call the Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877–8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 2007, we announced
the establishment of a distinct
population segment (DPS) of the grizzly
bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) for the
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
14497
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
GYA and surrounding area and removed
this DPS from the List of Threatened
and Endangered Wildlife (72 FR 14866).
In that rule, we determined that the
Yellowstone grizzly bear population
was no longer an endangered or
threatened population pursuant to the
ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), based on
the best scientific and commercial data
available. Robust population growth,
coupled with State and Federal
cooperation to manage mortality and
habitat, widespread public support for
grizzly bear recovery, and the
development of regulatory mechanisms,
brought the Yellowstone grizzly bear
population to the point where making a
change to its status was appropriate.
Subsequently, three lawsuits
challenging our decision were filed in
Federal courts in Boise, Idaho, and in
Missoula, Montana. Legal briefings in
these cases were completed in 2008.
In the Montana case, the plaintiff
presented four claims including: (1) The
regulatory mechanisms to protect the
grizzly once it is delisted are
inadequate; (2) the Service did not
adequately consider the impacts of
global warming and other factors on
whitebark pine nuts, a grizzly food
source; (3) the population is
unacceptably small and dependent on
translocation of outside animals for
genetic diversity; and (4) the Service did
not properly consider whether the
grizzlies were recovered across a
significant portion of their range.
On September 21, 2009, the Montana
District Court issued an order in which
plaintiffs prevailed on the first and
second counts, while the United States
prevailed on the third and fourth
counts. The court’s order vacated the
delisting and remanded it to the Service.
Thus, this final rule is required to
correct the Yellowstone grizzly bear
population’s listing status.
The United States is considering
whether to appeal this decision.
Regardless, this final rule is necessary
because this process, should we move
forward with an appeal, would likely
take several years to complete.
The grizzly bear is a member of the
brown bear species (U. arctos) that
occurs in North America, Europe, and
Asia; the subspecies U. a. horribilis is
limited to North America (Rausch 1963,
p. 43; Servheen 1999, pp. 50–53). The
original 1975 grizzly bear listing (40 FR
31734–31736, July 28, 1975) established
the listed entity as U. a. horribilis.
However, the entry for grizzly bear in
the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11(h) was later
modified inadvertently to U. arctos with
a historic holarctic range. We corrected
the listed entity back to its original form
in the March 29, 2007, final rule (72 FR
14866), which again set forth the listed
entity as U. arctos horribilis with a
historic range of North America. With
this final rule, we make this same
correction to the special regulations
found at 50 CFR 17.40(b) and 17.84(l).
Administrative Procedure
This rulemaking is necessary to
comply with the September 21, 2009,
court order. Therefore, under these
circumstances, the Director has
determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b),
that prior notice and opportunity for
public comment are impractical and
unnecessary. The Director has further
determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
that the agency has good cause to make
this rule effective upon publication.
Effects of the Rule
As of the filing of the respective court
order, any and all grizzly bears in the
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Status
GYA are listed as a threatened species
under the ESA. Because the Court
vacated the entire delisting rule and
remanded it to the Service, there is no
longer a GYA grizzly bear DPS. Thus, all
grizzly bears in the lower 48 States are
again listed as threatened (50 CFR
17.11(h)). An existing 4(d) rule again
applies to this population (50 CFR
17.40(b)).
This rule will not affect the grizzly
bear’s Appendix II status under the
Convention on International Trade of
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora (CITES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, in order to comply with
the court orders discussed above, we
amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter
I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below:
■
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 17.11 by revising the entry
in the table at paragraph (h) for ‘‘Bear,
grizzly’’ as follows:
■
§ 17.11
*
[Amended]
*
*
(h) * * *
When listed
*
*
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
Mammals
*
Ursus arctos
horribilis.
*
North America ........
Do ............................
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
*
Bear, grizzly ............
do ...........................
do ...........................
*
*
*
*
§ 17.40
*
*
*
U.S.A.,
T
conterminous
(lower 48) States,
except where listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (portions of
XN
ID and MT, see
17.84(l)).
[Amended]
3. Amend § 17.40 by adding the word
‘‘horribilis’’ after the word ‘‘arctos’’ in
paragraph (b) heading and in the
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
1, 2D, 9, 759
NA
*
17.40(b)
706
NA
17.84(l)
definition of ‘‘Grizzly bear’’ in paragraph
(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
14498
§ 17.84
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
[Amended]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Therefore, the Regional Administrator is
establishing a directed fishing
allowance of 2,011mt, and is setting
aside the remaining 20 mt as bycatch to
support other anticipated groundfish
fisheries. In accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional
Administrator finds that this directed
fishing allowance has been reached.
Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing for pollock in the West
Yakutat District of the GOA.
After the effective date of this closure
the maximum retainable amounts at
§ 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time
during a trip.
50 CFR Part 679
Classification
[Docket No. 0910131362–0087–02]
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the closure of pollock in the West
Yakutat District of the GOA. NMFS was
unable to publish a notice providing
time for public comment because the
most recent, relevant data only became
available as of March 22, 2010.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30–day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by § 679.20
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
4. Amend § 17.84 by adding the word
‘‘horribilis’’ after the word ‘‘arctos’’ in
paragraph (l) heading.
■
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–6802 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
RIN 0648–XV51
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in the West
Yakutat District of the Gulf of Alaska
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for pollock in the West Yakutat
District of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA).
This action is necessary to prevent
exceeding the 2010 total allowable catch
(TAC) of pollock in the West Yakutat
District of the GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), March 23, 2010, through
2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Furuness, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
The 2010 TAC of pollock in the West
Yakutat District of the GOA is 2,031
metric tons (mt) as established by the
final 2010 and 2011 harvest
specifications for groundfish of the GOA
(75 FR 11749, March 12, 2010).
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i),
the Regional Administrator has
determined that the 2010 TAC of
pollock in the West Yakutat District of
the GOA will soon be reached.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–6754 Filed 3–23–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 0910131363–0087–02]
RIN 0648–XV52
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Atka Mackerel in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for Atka mackerel in the Central
Aleutian District of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands management area
(BSAI) by vessels participating in the
Amendment 80 limited access fishery.
This action is necessary to prevent
exceeding the 2010 A season allocation
of Atka mackerel in this area allocated
to vessels participating in the
Amendment 80 limited access fishery.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), March 23, 2010, through
1200 hrs, A.l.t., September 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 908–586–7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
BSAI exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP) prepared by the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council under
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act. Regulations governing fishing by
U.S. vessels in accordance with the FMP
appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600
and 50 CFR part 679.
The 2010 A season allocation of Atka
mackerel allocated to vessels
participating in the Amendment 80
limited access fishery in the Central
Aleutian District was established as
7,457 metric tons (mt) by the final 2010
and 2011 harvest specifications for
groundfish in the BSAI (75 FR 11778,
March 12, 2010).
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i),
the Regional Administrator has
determined that the 2010 Atka mackerel
A season TAC allocated to vessels
participating in the Amendment 80
limited access fishery in the Central
Aleutian District of the BSAI will soon
be reached. Therefore, the Regional
Administrator is establishing a directed
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 58 (Friday, March 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14496-14498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6802]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2010-0021; 92220-1113-0000; C6]
RIN 1018-AW97
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of
Protections for the Grizzly Bear in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
in Compliance With Court Order
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are issuing
this final rule to comply with a court order that has the effect of
reinstating the regulatory protections under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (ESA), as amended, for the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos
horribilis) in the Greater Yellowstone Area (GYA) and surrounding area.
This rule corrects the grizzly bear listing to reinstate the listing of
grizzly bears in the GYA. This final rule also takes administrative
action to correct two associated special rules.
DATES: This action is effective March 26, 2010. However, the court
order had legal effect immediately upon being filed on September 21,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Christopher Servheen, Grizzly Bear
Recovery Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at our Missoula
office (see ADDRESSES above) or telephone (406) 243-4903. Individuals
who are hearing-impaired or speech-impaired may call the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877-8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 29, 2007, we announced the establishment of a distinct
population segment (DPS) of the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis)
for the
[[Page 14497]]
GYA and surrounding area and removed this DPS from the List of
Threatened and Endangered Wildlife (72 FR 14866). In that rule, we
determined that the Yellowstone grizzly bear population was no longer
an endangered or threatened population pursuant to the ESA (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.), based on the best scientific and commercial data
available. Robust population growth, coupled with State and Federal
cooperation to manage mortality and habitat, widespread public support
for grizzly bear recovery, and the development of regulatory
mechanisms, brought the Yellowstone grizzly bear population to the
point where making a change to its status was appropriate.
Subsequently, three lawsuits challenging our decision were filed in
Federal courts in Boise, Idaho, and in Missoula, Montana. Legal
briefings in these cases were completed in 2008.
In the Montana case, the plaintiff presented four claims including:
(1) The regulatory mechanisms to protect the grizzly once it is
delisted are inadequate; (2) the Service did not adequately consider
the impacts of global warming and other factors on whitebark pine nuts,
a grizzly food source; (3) the population is unacceptably small and
dependent on translocation of outside animals for genetic diversity;
and (4) the Service did not properly consider whether the grizzlies
were recovered across a significant portion of their range.
On September 21, 2009, the Montana District Court issued an order
in which plaintiffs prevailed on the first and second counts, while the
United States prevailed on the third and fourth counts. The court's
order vacated the delisting and remanded it to the Service. Thus, this
final rule is required to correct the Yellowstone grizzly bear
population's listing status.
The United States is considering whether to appeal this decision.
Regardless, this final rule is necessary because this process, should
we move forward with an appeal, would likely take several years to
complete.
The grizzly bear is a member of the brown bear species (U. arctos)
that occurs in North America, Europe, and Asia; the subspecies U. a.
horribilis is limited to North America (Rausch 1963, p. 43; Servheen
1999, pp. 50-53). The original 1975 grizzly bear listing (40 FR 31734-
31736, July 28, 1975) established the listed entity as U. a.
horribilis. However, the entry for grizzly bear in the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11(h) was later
modified inadvertently to U. arctos with a historic holarctic range. We
corrected the listed entity back to its original form in the March 29,
2007, final rule (72 FR 14866), which again set forth the listed entity
as U. arctos horribilis with a historic range of North America. With
this final rule, we make this same correction to the special
regulations found at 50 CFR 17.40(b) and 17.84(l).
Administrative Procedure
This rulemaking is necessary to comply with the September 21, 2009,
court order. Therefore, under these circumstances, the Director has
determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b), that prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are impractical and unnecessary. The
Director has further determined, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d), that the
agency has good cause to make this rule effective upon publication.
Effects of the Rule
As of the filing of the respective court order, any and all grizzly
bears in the GYA are listed as a threatened species under the ESA.
Because the Court vacated the entire delisting rule and remanded it to
the Service, there is no longer a GYA grizzly bear DPS. Thus, all
grizzly bears in the lower 48 States are again listed as threatened (50
CFR 17.11(h)). An existing 4(d) rule again applies to this population
(50 CFR 17.40(b)).
This rule will not affect the grizzly bear's Appendix II status
under the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of
Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Regulation Promulgation
0
Accordingly, in order to comply with the court orders discussed above,
we amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 17--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361-1407; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1544; 16 U.S.C.
4201-4245; Pub. L. 99-625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.11 by revising the entry in the table at paragraph
(h) for ``Bear, grizzly'' as follows:
Sec. 17.11 [Amended]
* * * * *
(h) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Vertebrate
---------------------------------------------------- population where Critical Special
Historic range endangered or Status When listed habitat rules
Common name Scientific name threatened
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mammals
* * * * * * *
Bear, grizzly.................. Ursus arctos North America..... U.S.A., T 1, 2D, 9, 759 NA 17.40(b)
horribilis. conterminous
(lower 48)
States, except
where listed as
an experimental
population.
Do............................. do................ do................ U.S.A. (portions XN 706 NA 17.84(l)
of ID and MT, see
17.84(l)).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 17.40 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.40 by adding the word ``horribilis'' after the word
``arctos'' in paragraph (b) heading and in the definition of ``Grizzly
bear'' in paragraph (b)(2).
[[Page 14498]]
Sec. 17.84 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.84 by adding the word ``horribilis'' after the word
``arctos'' in paragraph (l) heading.
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-6802 Filed 3-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
