Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, 14493-14495 [2010-6693]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
regulation to which objection is made
and the grounds for the objection. Each
numbered objection on which a hearing
is requested shall specifically so state.
Failure to request a hearing for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on that
objection. Each numbered objection for
which a hearing is requested shall
include a detailed description and
analysis of the specific factual
information intended to be presented in
support of the objection in the event
that a hearing is held. Failure to include
such a description and analysis for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on the
objection. Three copies of all documents
are to be submitted and are to be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Any objections received in
response to the regulation may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. FDA will publish notice
of the objections that the agency has
received or lack thereof in the Federal
Register.
VIII. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. Memorandum from D. Folmer, Division
of Petition Review, to F. Ellison, Division of
Petition Review, January 30, 2009.
2. Memorandum from A. Khan, Division of
Petition Review, to F. Ellison, Division of
Petition Review, April 23, 2009.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73
Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs,
Medical devices.
■ Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Director, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition, 21 CFR part 73 is
amended as follows:
PART 73—LISTING OF COLOR
ADDITIVES EXEMPT FROM
CERTIFICATION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 73 continues to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 343,
348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e.
2. Section 73.2110 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 73.2110
Bismuth citrate.
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
*
*
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
14493
Dated: March 17, 2010.
Leslye M. Fraser,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and
Social Sciences, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition.
Granquist, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Honolulu, telephone 808–842–2600, email Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2010–6731 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
Regulatory Information
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
On February 5, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Dive Platform,
Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa in
the Federal Register (75 FR 5907). We
received no comments and no public
meeting was requested or held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Making this safety zone
effective March 25, 2010 is essential to
protect the public from the hazards
associated with pre-staging large vessels
for the planned diving operations in and
around the CHEHALIS wreck.
(c) * * *
(1) The amount of bismuth citrate in
the cosmetic shall not be in excess of 2.0
percent (w/v).
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0002]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago
Harbor, American Samoa
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
around the USNS Sioux or M/V EL
LOBO GRANDE II dive platform and the
332-foot Tanker Barge CAPELLA while
they are performing operations in and
around the CHEHALIS wreck. The
safety zone is necessary to protect other
vessels and the general public from
hazards associated with pre-staging
vessels and dive operations. Entry into
or remaining in the safety zone during
the effective period is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Honolulu.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on March 25, 2010 through 8 p.m. on
April 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0002 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0002 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Lieutenant Commander Marcella
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Background and Purpose
On October 7, 1949 the 4,130-ton
gasoline tanker CHEHALIS sank in Pago
Pago Inner Harbor, in an estimated 160
feet of water, approximately 350-feet
from the fuel dock located near Goat
Island Point, Pago Pago, American
Samoa. From April 23, 2009 to May 10,
2009, the U.S. Coast Guard performed
dive operations on the CHEHALIS
wreck to determine the wreck’s
potential pollution threat to the
environment. In December 2009, the
U.S. Coast Guard planned dive
operations to mitigate the wreck’s
potential pollution threat with prestaging vessels beginning March 25,
2010 and conducting diving operations
from March 27, 2010 to April 17, 2010.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received and no
public meeting was held. Two changes
from the proposed temporary rule to the
final temporary rule are necessary to
enact the safety zone during the prestaging of the dive platform and
associated 332-foot Tank Barge starting
on March 25, 2010 to ensure dive
operations finish by April 17, 2010.
First, we are changing the effective date
of the regulation to March 25, 2010
instead of March 29, 2010. Second, we
are slightly enlarging the area of the
safety zone to accommodate both the
dive platform and the Tank Barge, from
a proposed 200-foot radius to an area
approximately 600 by 300 feet. We note
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
14494
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
that vessels will still be able to transit
around the enlarged safety zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Vessels will be able to transit around
the zone. The Sector Honolulu Captain
of the Port will allow vessels in the zone
on a case-by-case basis.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
since vessels will be allowed to transit
around temporary Safety Zone north of
the fuel dock in Pago Pago Inner Harbor,
American Samoa. If you think that your
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 58 / Friday, March 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction.
This rule involves the creation of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–199 to read as
follows:
■
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters
contained around the USNS Sioux or
M/V EL LOBO GRANDE II dive platform
and the 332-foot Tanker Barge
CAPELLA while they are performing
operations in and around the
CHEHALIS wreck in Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa. This safety zone is in
the rough shape of a box 600 feet east/
west and 300 feet north/south bounded
by the points: 14°16′36″ S, 170°40′51″
W; 14°16′24″ S, 170°40′51″ W; 14°16′27″
S, 170°40′48″ W, 14°16′88″ S,
170°41′67″ W, and 14°16′34″ S,
170°40′56″ W. This safety zone extends
from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor. These coordinates are based
upon the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Coast
Survey, Pacific Ocean, Samoa Islands,
chart 83484.
(b) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 6 a.m. on March 25, 2010
through 8 p.m. on April 17, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) Except for persons
or vessels described in paragraph (c)(3)
of this section, in accordance with the
general regulations in 33 CFR part 165,
Subpart C, entry into or remaining in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:47 Mar 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section is prohibited.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zone may contact the
Captain of the Port at telephone number
1–684–633–2299, the dive platform
vessel on VHF channel 16 (156.800
MHz), or at telephone number 1–808–
842–2600, to seek permission to transit
the area. If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels must comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
(3) No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the zone except for support
vessels/aircraft and support personnel,
or other vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule would be subject to
the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232
and 50 U.S.C. 192.
authorizations, ‘‘§ 251.53(e) and (l)’’ is
replaced with ‘‘§ 251.53(e) or easements
issued under § 251.53(l).’’ These
corrections are necessary to continue to
reflect that only revocation or
suspension of an easement, not a
permit, is subject to formal
administrative proceedings under the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act.
Dated: March 10, 2010.
B.A. Compagnoni,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–6693 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
■
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
36 CFR Part 251
Correcting Amendments
Forest Service, USDA.
Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to the final rule governing
the Forest Service’s Special Use
Program that was published in the
Federal Register on December 24, 2009
(74 FR 68379). These corrections add
phrases which were inadvertently
omitted from the final rule and which
are necessary to reflect properly the
Forest Service’s authority to revoke or
suspend special use authorizations
under the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act.
DATES: Effective on March 26, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Julett Denton, Lands Special Uses
Program Manager, (202) 205–1256.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 36 CFR
251.60(a)(2)(i) and (ii), governing
revocation and suspension of special
use authorizations, the phrase
‘‘§ 251.53(e) and (1)’’ is replaced with
‘‘§ 251.53(e) or an easement issued
under § 251.53(l).’’ In 36 CFR 251.60(g),
also governing revocation and
suspension of special use
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 251
Administrative practice and
procedure, Electric power, National
forests, Public lands––rights-of-way,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water resources.
■ Accordingly, 36 CFR part 251 is
corrected to read as follows:
PART 251—LAND USES
Subpart B—Special Uses
1. The authority citation for part 251
continues to read as follow:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1011; 16 U.S.C. 518,
551, 678a; Pub. L. 76–867, 54 Stat. 1197.
2. In § 251.60, revise paragraphs
(a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), and (g) to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
§ 251.60 Termination, revocation, and
suspension.
Forest Service
§ 165.T14–199 Safety Zone; Dive Platform
Vessel, Pago Pago Harbor, American
Samoa.
14495
Sfmt 4700
(a) * * *
(2) All other special uses—(i)
Revocation or suspension. An
authorized officer may revoke or
suspend a special use authorization for
all other special uses, except a permit or
an easement issued pursuant to
§ 251.53(e) or an easement issued under
§ 251.53(l) of this subpart:
(ii) Administrative review. Except for
revocation or suspension of a permit or
an easement issued pursuant to
§ 251.53(e) or an easement issued under
§ 251.53(l) of this subpart, suspension or
revocation of a special use authorization
under this paragraph is subject to
administrative appeal in accordance
with 36 CFR part 251, subpart C, of this
chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) The authorized officer may
suspend or revoke permits or easements
issued under § 251.53(e) or easements
issued under § 251.53(l) of this subpart
under the Rules of Practice Governing
Formal Adjudicatory Administrative
Proceedings instituted by the Secretary
under 7 CFR 1.130 through 1.151.
Dated: March 20, 2010.
Hank Kashdan,
Associate Chief.
[FR Doc. 2010–6630 Filed 3–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 58 (Friday, March 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14493-14495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6693]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0002]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone around
the USNS Sioux or M/V EL LOBO GRANDE II dive platform and the 332-foot
Tanker Barge CAPELLA while they are performing operations in and around
the CHEHALIS wreck. The safety zone is necessary to protect other
vessels and the general public from hazards associated with pre-staging
vessels and dive operations. Entry into or remaining in the safety zone
during the effective period is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Honolulu.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on March 25, 2010 through 8
p.m. on April 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0002 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0002 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander Marcella Granquist, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone 808-
842-2600, e-mail Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 5, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago Harbor, American
Samoa in the Federal Register (75 FR 5907). We received no comments and
no public meeting was requested or held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Making this safety zone effective
March 25, 2010 is essential to protect the public from the hazards
associated with pre-staging large vessels for the planned diving
operations in and around the CHEHALIS wreck.
Background and Purpose
On October 7, 1949 the 4,130-ton gasoline tanker CHEHALIS sank in
Pago Pago Inner Harbor, in an estimated 160 feet of water,
approximately 350-feet from the fuel dock located near Goat Island
Point, Pago Pago, American Samoa. From April 23, 2009 to May 10, 2009,
the U.S. Coast Guard performed dive operations on the CHEHALIS wreck to
determine the wreck's potential pollution threat to the environment. In
December 2009, the U.S. Coast Guard planned dive operations to mitigate
the wreck's potential pollution threat with pre-staging vessels
beginning March 25, 2010 and conducting diving operations from March
27, 2010 to April 17, 2010.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received and no public meeting was held. Two
changes from the proposed temporary rule to the final temporary rule
are necessary to enact the safety zone during the pre-staging of the
dive platform and associated 332-foot Tank Barge starting on March 25,
2010 to ensure dive operations finish by April 17, 2010. First, we are
changing the effective date of the regulation to March 25, 2010 instead
of March 29, 2010. Second, we are slightly enlarging the area of the
safety zone to accommodate both the dive platform and the Tank Barge,
from a proposed 200-foot radius to an area approximately 600 by 300
feet. We note
[[Page 14494]]
that vessels will still be able to transit around the enlarged safety
zone.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Vessels will be able to transit around the zone. The Sector
Honolulu Captain of the Port will allow vessels in the zone on a case-
by-case basis.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities since vessels will be allowed to transit around
temporary Safety Zone north of the fuel dock in Pago Pago Inner Harbor,
American Samoa. If you think that your business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this
rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a
comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how
and to what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
[[Page 14495]]
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This
rule involves the creation of a temporary safety zone. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-199 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T14-199 Safety Zone; Dive Platform Vessel, Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters contained around the USNS Sioux or M/V EL LOBO GRANDE II dive
platform and the 332-foot Tanker Barge CAPELLA while they are
performing operations in and around the CHEHALIS wreck in Pago Pago
Harbor, American Samoa. This safety zone is in the rough shape of a box
600 feet east/west and 300 feet north/south bounded by the points:
14[deg]16'36'' S, 170[deg]40'51'' W; 14[deg]16'24'' S, 170[deg]40'51''
W; 14[deg]16'27'' S, 170[deg]40'48'' W, 14[deg]16'88'' S,
170[deg]41'67'' W, and 14[deg]16'34'' S, 170[deg]40'56'' W. This safety
zone extends from the surface of the water to the ocean floor. These
coordinates are based upon the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Coast Survey, Pacific Ocean, Samoa Islands, chart 83484.
(b) Effective period. This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on March
25, 2010 through 8 p.m. on April 17, 2010.
(c) Regulations. (1) Except for persons or vessels described in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, in accordance with the general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165, Subpart C, entry into or remaining in
the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is
prohibited.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone may
contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 1-684-633-2299, the
dive platform vessel on VHF channel 16 (156.800 MHz), or at telephone
number 1-808-842-2600, to seek permission to transit the area. If
permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
(3) No person or vessel may enter or remain in the zone except for
support vessels/aircraft and support personnel, or other vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule would be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: March 10, 2010.
B.A. Compagnoni,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2010-6693 Filed 3-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P