Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates, 14111-14116 [2010-6490]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Operating Reserve-Supplemental to
provide for the inclusion of other
technologies that could reliably
contribute to operating reserves,
including demand-side management.58
IV. Information Collection Statement
48. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regulations require that
OMB approve certain reporting and
recordkeeping (collections of
information) imposed by an agency.59
The information contained here is also
subject to review under section 3507(d)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.60 By remanding the proposed
Reliability Standard the Commission is
maintaining the status quo until future
revisions to the Reliability Standard are
approved by the Commission. Thus, the
Commission’s proposed action does not
add to or increase entities’ reporting
burden.
V. Environmental Analysis
49. The Commission is required to
prepare an Environmental Assessment
or an Environmental Impact Statement
for any action that may have a
significant adverse effect on the human
environment.61 The Commission has
categorically excluded certain actions
from this requirement as not having a
significant effect on the human
environment. Included in the exclusion
are rules that are clarifying, corrective,
or procedural or that do not
substantially change the effect of the
regulations being amended.62 The
actions proposed herein fall within this
categorical exclusion in the
Commission’s regulations.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification
50. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980 (RFA) 63 generally requires a
description and analysis of final rules
that will have significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA mandates
consideration of regulatory alternatives
that accomplish the stated objectives of
a proposed rule and that minimize any
significant economic impact on a
58 The Commission recognizes that there may be
regional limitations on the amount of demand-side
management, or other technically capable
resources, that can be reliably employed. Any
modifications proposed to the Commission must
allow regional discretion to make this
determination based on the technical issues
inherent to those regions.
59 5 CFR 1320.11.
60 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
61 Regulations Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486,
FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,783 (1987).
62 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).
63 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
substantial number of small entities.
The Small Business Administration’s
Office of Size Standards develops the
numerical definition of a small
business.64 For electric utilities, a firm
is small if, including affiliates, it is
primarily engaged in the transmission,
generation and/or distribution of
electric energy for sale and its total
electric output for the preceding twelve
months did not exceed four million
megawatt hours. The RFA is not
implicated by this proposed rule
because by remanding the proposed
Reliability Standard the Commission is
maintaining the status quo until future
revisions to the Reliability Standard are
approved by the Commission.
VII. Comment Procedures
51. The Commission invites interested
persons to submit comments on the
matters and issues proposed in this
notice to be adopted, including any
related matters or alternative proposals
that commenters may wish to discuss.
Comments are due May 24, 2010.
Comments must refer to Docket No.
RM09–15–000, and must include the
commenter’s name, the organization
they represent, if applicable, and their
address in their comments.
52. The Commission encourages
comments to be filed electronically via
the eFiling link on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.ferc.gov. The
Commission accepts most standard
word processing formats. Documents
created electronically using word
processing software should be filed in
native applications or print-to-PDF
format and not in a scanned format.
Commenters filing electronically do not
need to make a paper filing.
53. Commenters that are not able to
file comments electronically must send
an original and 14 copies of their
comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
54. All comments will be placed in
the Commission’s public files and may
be viewed, printed, or downloaded
remotely as described in the Document
Availability section below. Commenters
on this proposal are not required to
serve copies of their comments on other
commenters.
VIII. Document Availability
55. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the Internet through
64 See
PO 00000
13 CFR 121.201.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14111
FERC’s Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov)
and in FERC’s Public Reference Room
during normal business hours (8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC
20426.
56. From FERC’s Home Page on the
Internet, this information is available on
eLibrary. The full text of this document
is available on eLibrary in PDF and
Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access
this document in eLibrary, type the
docket number excluding the last three
digits of this document in the docket
number field.
57. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the FERC’s Web site during
normal business hours from FERC
Online Support at 202–502–6652 (toll
free at 1–866–208–3676) or e-mail at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. E-mail the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
By direction of the Commission.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–6477 Filed 3–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 22
[Public Notice: 6928]
RIN 1400–AC57 and 1400–AC58
Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates
Department of State.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State
(‘‘Department’’) published two proposed
rules in the Federal Register on
December 14, 2009, and February 9,
2010, proposing to amend the Schedule
of Fees for Consular Services. In this
supplemental proposed rule, the
Department of State is providing
additional supplementary information
regarding the Cost of Survey Study
(CoSS), the activity-based costing model
that the Department used to determine
the fees for consular services proposed
in. The Department is also re-opening
the comment periods on both proposed
rules for an additional 15 days.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before 15 days from the
date of publication in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
14112
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Interested parties may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
• Persons with access to the Internet
may view this notice and submit
comments by going to the
regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM): U.S.
Department of State, Office of the
Executive Director, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Suite
H1001, 2401 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20520.
• E-mail: fees@state.gov. You must
include the RIN (either 1400–AC57 or
1400–AC58, or both) in the subject line
of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob
Kline, Office of the Comptroller, Bureau
of Consular Affairs, phone (202) 663–
2513. E-mail: fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
The Department of State
(‘‘Department’’) published two proposed
rules in the Federal Register on
December 14, 2009 (74 FR 66076, Public
Notice 6851, RIN 1400–AC57), and on
February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6321, Public
Notice 6887, RIN 1400–AC58),
proposing to amend sections of part 22
of Title 22 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services. The Department’s
proposed rules solicited comments, and
a number of comments requested
additional detail on the Consular
Services Cost of Service Study (CoSS) as
well as time to comment on that detail.
In response, the Department is
providing the additional written detail
below.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Additional Detail on the Cost of Service
Study
Activity-Based Costing Generally
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A–25 states that it is the
objective of the United States
Government to ‘‘(a) ensure that each
service, sale, or use of Government
goods or resources provided by an
agency to specific recipients be selfsustaining; [and] (b) promote efficient
allocation of the Nation’s resources by
establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least
as great as costs to the Government of
providing the special benefits * * *.’’
OMB Circular A–25, ¶ 5(a)–(b); see also
31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (agency ‘‘may
prescribe regulations establishing the
charge for a service or thing of value
provided by the agency * * * based on
* * * the costs to the Government
* * *.’’). To set prices that are ‘‘self-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
sustaining,’’ the Department must
determine the true cost of providing
consular services. Following guidance
provided in Statement #4 of OMB’s
Statement of Federal Accounting
Standards (SFFAS), available at https://
www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf, the
Department chose to develop and use an
activity-based costing (ABC) model to
determine the true cost of the services
listed in its Schedule of Fees, both those
whose fee the Department proposes to
change, as well as those whose fee will
remain unchanged from prior years. The
Department refers to the specific ABC
model that underpins the proposed fees
in the above-referenced rules as the
‘‘Cost of Service Study’’ or ‘‘CoSS.’’
The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) defines activity-based
costing as a ‘‘set of accounting methods
used to identify and describe costs and
required resources for activities within
processes.’’ Because an organization can
use the same staff and resources
(computer equipment, production
facilities, etc.) to produce multiple
products or services, ABC models seek
to precisely identify and assign costs to
processes and activities and then to
individual products and services
through the identification of key cost
drivers referred to as ‘‘resource drivers’’
and ‘‘activity drivers.’’
Example: Imagine a government agency
that has a single facility it uses to prepare
and issue a single product—a driver’s
license. In this simple scenario, every cost
associated with that facility (the salaries of
employees, the electricity to power the
computer terminals, the cost of a blank
driver’s license, etc.) can be attributed
directly to the cost of producing that single
item. If that agency wants to ensure that it
is charging a ‘‘self-sustaining’’ price for
driver’s licenses, it only has to divide its total
costs for a given time period by an estimate
of the number of driver’s licenses to be
produced during that same time period.
However, if that agency issues multiple
products (driver’s licenses, non-driver ID
cards, etc.), has employees that work on other
activities besides licenses (for example,
accepting payment for traffic tickets), and
operates out of multiple facilities it shares
with other agencies, it becomes much more
complex for the agency to determine exactly
how much it costs to produce any single
product. In those instances, the agency
would need to know what percent of time its
employees spend on each service and how
much of its overhead (rent, utilities, facilities
maintenance, etc.) are consumed in
delivering each service to determine the cost
of producing each of its various products—
the driver’s license, the non-driver ID card,
etc. Using an ABC model would allow the
agency to develop those costs.
Components of Activity-Based Costing
As noted in SFFAS Statement #4,
‘‘activity-based costing has gained broad
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
acceptance by manufacturing and
service industries as an effective
managerial tool.’’ SSFAS Statement #4,
¶ 147. There are no ‘‘off-the-shelf’’ ABC
models that allow the Department (or
any other entity) to simply populate a
few data points and generate an answer.
ABC models require financial and
accounting analysis and modeling skills
combined with a detailed understanding
of all the organization’s business
processes, which, in an entity the size
of the Department’s Bureau of Consular
Affairs, are exceedingly complex. More
specifically, ABC models require an
organization to:
• Identify all of the activities that are
required to produce a particular product
or service (‘‘activities’’);
• Identify all of the resources
consumed (costs) in the course of
producing that product or service
(‘‘resources’’);
• Measure the quantity of resources
consumed (‘‘resource driver’’); and
• Measure the frequency and
intensity of demand placed on activities
to produce services (‘‘activity driver’’).
For more information, SFFAS
Statement #4 provides a detailed
discussion of the use of cost accounting
by the U.S. Government.
Example: To consume a peanut butter and
jelly sandwich, a person might engage in
multiple activities: grocery shopping,
sandwich making, sandwich eating, and
kitchen cleaning. Each of these activities
consumes resources: grocery shopping, for
example, requires gas to drive to the store,
time to make the trip, and money to buy the
peanut butter, jelly, and bread. A person
might be able to make 25 peanut butter and
jelly sandwiches with a single jar of peanut
butter; as a result, the resource driver for
peanut butter would be 1/25th of a jar of
peanut butter. If a person chooses to eat two
peanut butter and jelly sandwiches at a meal,
the activity driver for ‘‘kitchen cleaning’’
would be 1⁄2 since the person would eat two
sandwiches, but only have to clean the
kitchen once.
Although the Department has used a
sophisticated and detailed ABC model
to set fees for a number of years, in its
October 10, 2007, report ‘‘Transparent
Cost Estimates Needed to Support
Passport Execution Fee Decisions,’’
available at https://www.gao.gov/
products/GAO–08–63, the GAO asked
the Department to expand the
sophistication of its cost model by
identifying even more discrete activities
and modeling a broader array of
products and services. To provide this
additional detail, the Department
launched a multi-year plan to refine the
CoSS with the help of a team of
experienced outside consultants led by
The QED Group, LLC, and including
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. as a
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
subcontractor. The consultant team was
made up of experts in cost modeling
capable of providing an objective,
outside assessment of costs.
Consular Service Activities
Working with its consultants, the
Department reviewed all of its consular
operations and identified 262 distinct
activities—including 77 visa-specific
activities, 11 passport-specific activities,
58 activities specific to overseas citizen
services, and 116 cross-cutting activities
(such as cashiering, fraud prevention,
and public affairs outreach). This list
includes more than five times as many
activities than the Department’s cost
model from the prior CoSS, which broke
out 52 activities. The Department
provides the following examples of
some of the activities that make up a
consular operation to illustrate the
substantial complexity that the CoSS
must be capable of taking into account:
• Processing a passport book (Items 1,
2a/2b, and 2g of the proposed Schedule
of Fees). Fifty-two separate CoSS
activities are required to process a firsttime application for a passport book,
including the following actions:
—Public outreach, such as maintaining
passport information on the
Department’s Web site (https://
travel.state.gov) and operating
appointment systems for our passport
agencies;
—Answering phone and written
inquiries from the public regarding
passport rules and pending
applications;
—Nine separate activities related to data
entry of applications, from capturing
applicant photos and processing
payment to supervisor audits of the
process;
—Investigation of and coordination with
federal law enforcement on
potentially fraudulent applications;
—Actual adjudication of the
application;
—Production of the personalized
passport itself; and
—Archiving completed applications for
future reference.
• Adding additional visa pages to a
passport (Item 2c of the proposed
Schedule of Fees). Among the 51
activities involved in adding additional
pages to a passport are the following:
—Receiving the application and
entering data from it into the system;
—Performing a name check for the
applicant and reviewing the results to
determine if there any legal
impediments to providing the service,
such as an outstanding federal
warrant for the applicant’s arrest;
—Physically affixing the pages to the
passport; and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
—Auditing of the process by a
supervisor.
• Processing a non-petition-based
machine-readable nonimmigrant visa
(MRV) (Item 21a of the proposed
schedule of fees). Ninety-nine CoSS
activities are required in processing an
application for a non-petition-based
MRV, such as a tourist visa, including:
—Public outreach, such as responding
to public inquiries as to the status of
MRV applications;
—Conducting an interview of the MRV
applicant;
—Collecting biometrics from the MRV
applicant;
—Actual adjudication of the
application;
—Requesting advisory opinions from
attorneys at headquarters regarding
how specific laws and regulations
apply to complicated applications;
—Requesting security advisory opinions
from headquarters about applicants
the consular officer believes may
present a risk to U.S. national
security;
—Investigating possible fraud in those
applications; and
—Producing the actual, physical visa,
affixing it to the applicant’s passport,
and returning that product to the
applicant.
´
• Processing a fiancé(e) (K category)
MRV (Item 21d). One hundred and three
CoSS activities are required to process
an application for a K1-category
´
fiancé(e) nonimmigrant visa, including:
—Pre-processing of the case at the
National Visa Center, where the
petition is received from the
Department of Homeland Security,
packaged and assigned to the
appropriate embassy or consulate; and
—Intake and review of materials
required for a K visa that are not
required for other nonimmigrant
visas, such as the I–134 affidavit of
support and the DS–2054 medical
examination report;
—Conducting an interview of the K visa
applicant;
—Collecting biometrics from the K visa
applicant;
—Actual adjudication of the
application;
—Requesting legal opinions from
headquarters as necessary;
—Investigating possible fraud in those
applications; and
—Producing the physical visa, affixing
it to the applicant’s passport, and
returning that product to the
applicant.
• Processing a letter rogatory (Item
51). Sixty CoSS activities are required to
service a request for a letter rogatory,
covering actions including:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14113
—Receipt of the request at headquarters
and dispatch of a telegram to an
embassy or consulate instructing that
the service be initiated;
—Preparation of a diplomatic note to be
sent to the appropriate foreign
government; and
—Monitoring the case as it progresses
through foreign government channels,
and regularly updating the customer
on the status of the case.
By taking the 52 activities from the
prior CoSS and breaking them down
further into 262 activities in the current
CoSS, the Department was able to model
its costs much more precisely. As a
result, the Department was able to
identify differences in both resource
drivers and activity drivers that had
previously been obscured. For example,
the Department has better data now on
how much additional time a consular
officer spends on reviewing the case file
´
for a K fiancé(e) visa (resource driver) as
well as how much more frequently an
officer seeks assistance from fraud
prevention resources as part of a K visa
application (activity driver) compared to
a standard tourist visa application. Not
surprisingly, this additional detail has
dramatically increased the complexity
of the CoSS because the Department
now matches costs with activities at a
more granular level.
Determining the Cost of Performing
Each Consular Activity
After defining each activity, the
Department used the CoSS model to
determine the total costs to perform that
activity. As noted in SFFAS Statement
#4, ‘‘[d]epending on feasibility and costbenefit considerations, resource costs
may be assigned to activities in three
ways: (a) Direct tracing; (b) estimation
based on surveys, interviews, or
statistical sampling; or (c) allocations.’’
SSFAS Statement #4, ¶ 149(2).
Direct trace costs are quite obvious
and easy to identify. For the activities
listed above they include, for example,
what the Department pays for each
physical passport book, the paper
affixed to the book of a customer who
requests additional pages, or the visa
foil that is placed into an applicant’s
passport.
Determining how to assign other types
of costs to activities is much more
difficult than direct trace costs since an
employee or resource may be involved
in many different activities or processes.
To give a few examples from among the
large number of factors that go into
determining ‘‘assigned costs’’ for the
scores of consular services, such costs
would include how much time a
passport specialist spent to adjudicate a
particular passport application; how
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
14114
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
much time a passport agency employee
spent processing payment for a
passport; how much time another
employee spent performing a qualitycontrol check on this and other passport
work; how much time a consular officer
at an embassy or consulate spent
interviewing a visa applicant, and
another employee spent taking the
applicant’s fingerprints; how much time
that officer then spent adjudicating the
visa application; how much time the
fraud unit spent investigating whether
bank documents submitted in a visa
application are fraudulent; and how
much time legal staff at headquarters
spent determining whether an
individual’s claim to citizenship is
adequately documented.
Finally, the third set of costs,
allocated costs, is neither obvious nor
easy to trace. With assigned costs, the
entire amount is counted as a consular
cost and the decision is what share of
that cost should be assigned to what
activity. In determining allocated costs,
only a portion of the whole are included
in the model because only that portion
can be assigned to consular activities.
One example of this is the Department’s
Bureau of Human Resources, which
provides services to all of the
Department. The CoSS model includes
only a portion of that Bureau’s costs,
based on the percentage of Department
employees who perform consular work.
To provide another example, when
considering the cost to keep a particular
facility (embassy, consulate, passport
agency, etc.) functioning, the
Department first determined what
portion of that facility is used to provide
consular services, and then allocated
within the CoSS model how much of
that smaller amount should be charged
to the activities associated with
providing a given customer with a given
service—such as a passport or a
nonimmigrant visa—at that location.
The Department estimates that, on the
whole, 19.6% of its consular costs are
direct trace, 60.7% are assigned costs,
and the remaining 19.7% are allocated
costs, although the exact breakdown of
these costs varies by activity. Given that
such a high percentage of the
Department’s costs are assigned or
allocated costs, the Department devoted
substantial efforts to modeling these
costs.
Assigning Costs
To assign labor costs, the Department
relied on a variety of industry standard
estimation methodologies. For example,
the Department analyzed passport
agency task reports to determine how
much time passport specialists working
at a passport agency devote to particular
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
tasks—for example, time spent serving
customers in the window versus time
spent in training or performing
administrative duties versus time spent
actually adjudicating passports. To
estimate how much time consular
officers overseas spend on consular
activities, the Department asked
consular officers at 200 overseas posts to
complete a 98-question survey. This
survey asked Consular Affairs personnel
to break out the time they spend on each
consular activity they perform during a
typical month—visa interviews, visa
adjudication, passport adjudication,
performing welfare and whereabouts
visits, responding to judicial assistance
requests from American citizens abroad,
notarizing documents for American
citizens abroad, issuing consular reports
of birth abroad, and so forth. The
responses to the survey were then used
to develop resource drivers to assign
labor costs to activities. To give one
example, in the survey responses,
foreign service national (FSN)
employees in Mumbai, India, indicated
that as a whole they spent 6,586 hours
on consular activities in a typical
month, of which 955 hours (14.5% of
their time) were spent on performing
nonimmigrant visa application intake.
Total annual compensation for Mumbai
FSNs was $783,988. Based on the
percentage calculated above, 14.5% of
their compensation, or $113,678, was
calculated as the cost of this one activity
for this one post for this one labor
category.
To assign activity costs to the
individual services, the Department
extracted volume data by product type
from its data systems. For example, to
determine how to assign the costs of
adjudicating nonimmigrant visas, the
Department analyzed the volume of
nonimmigrant visas issued by category
(B, H, K, L, and so forth) for a given time
period, which in turn became the
activity driver for this data. For
activities at embassies and consulates
abroad, this volume data is collected
from the ‘‘Consular Package’’ every
consular section submits annually via
the Internet-based Consular Workload
Statistics System (CWSS). For more than
30 years, the Consular Package has been
the single most important document
consular managers use to report, plan,
and budget for consular operations, and
is the key document linking consular
objectives to resource and personnel
requirements. CWSS collects and
evaluates data from 239 individual
consular sections in consulates and
embassies worldwide, and provides
customizable reports of available data.
CWSS is designed to provide the most
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comprehensive picture of each post’s
consular operations and cumulatively of
embassies and consulates by region and
worldwide. It provides an overview of
the volume and nature of the embassy’s
or consulate’s consular workload;
personnel and work hours devoted to it;
the challenges faced; and the outlook for
the future. These reports yield a wealth
of data and are an exceptionally
valuable management tool for
determining consular resource needs.
Volume data for all consular services
the Department provides at its
embassies and consulates overseas—
passport and citizenship services,
emergency services to American
citizens, nonimmigrant and immigrant
visa services, judicial services, etc.—is
captured from the CWSS. Using the
Mumbai example above, the costs for
the processing of nonimmigrant visa
application intake activity were
assigned to nonimmigrant visas
according to volume by visa category, as
collected from the CWSS—an activity
driver referred to as ‘‘nonimmigrant visa
applications.’’ Of the 253,394
nonimmigrant visas issued in Mumbai
during FY 2008, 209,120 (82.5%) of
them were ‘‘base MRVs,’’ that is nonpetition-based nonimmigrant visas
(excluding the E category). Thus, 82.5%
of the FSN costs for this activity
($93,784 of the $113,678 total) were
assigned to ‘‘base MRVs’’ for this one
cost element.
For consular activities that take place
in the United States, the Department
collects volume data from periodic
workload reports pertaining to the
passport or visa facilities in question.
For example, for volume data on the
processing of passport applications or
requests for additional pages submitted
to one of the many passport agencies in
cities across the United States, the
Department collects volume data from
monthly workload reports pulled from
the passport management information
system, a management database.
After collecting and analyzing all
available cost and workload data, the
Department converted this raw data into
resource drivers and activity drivers for
each resource and activity. The resulting
14-gigabyte database constitutes the
CoSS model. Because the CoSS is a
complex series of iterative computer
processes incorporating more than a
million calculations, it cannot itself be
reduced to a tangible form such as a
document, notwithstanding the use of
the word ‘‘study’’ in the term ‘‘cost of
service study.’’
The final component required to
determine unit costs is ‘‘scenario
planning,’’ described in the following
section.
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Scenario Planning
Scenario planning allowed the
Department to predict levels of future
demand for specific services and
evaluated their impact on unit costs.
Without scenario planning, an activitybased costing model can only determine
historical costs, or how much it cost to
produce something in the past. As there
is no mechanism for the Department to
charge retroactive fees to recipients of
prior services, and in accordance with
OMB objectives, the Department
endeavors to determine a ‘‘selfsustaining’’ price for future service
delivery. OMB Circular A–25, ¶ 5(a).
Through scenario planning, the
Department can convert historical data
about service costs into forward-looking
estimates of how much a service will
cost in the future.
Private industry has significantly
greater flexibility in altering its
personnel and overhead costs based on
changes in demand than do government
agencies. As roughly 70% of the
workforce involved in providing
consular services are full-time federal
employees, if demand for a service falls
precipitously, the Department cannot
shed employees as quickly as the
private sector. (For that matter, should
demand rise precipitously, the
Department cannot add employees as
quickly, since delivering the vast
majority of consular services requires
specially trained employees, and these
persons cannot begin their training until
they have completed the federal hiring
process and passed a security
clearance.) Additionally, given
government procurement rules and
security requirements, the Department
commits to many of its facilities and
infrastructure costs years before a
facility comes online. Even if demand
changes, the Department is still
obligated to cover these costs. As a
result, when setting fees, the
Department must assume that the
majority of its short-term costs cannot
drop significantly. Given these and
other constraints on altering the
Department’s cost structure in the short
term, changes in service volumes can
have dramatic effects on whether a fee
is ‘‘self-sustaining,’’ and forecasting
demand becomes crucial.
Example: In the original example above
involving the issuance of driver’s licenses,
assume that the agency is obligated to spend
$1 million per year on staff and facilities
costs regardless of how many applicants
apply for a driver’s license. If that agency
believes 100,000 people will apply for a
driver’s license next year, then charging $10
for each driver’s license would be a ‘‘selfsustaining’’ fee. However, if only 75,000
people actually applied for a $10 driver’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
license, the agency would face a $250,000
budget shortfall (or 25% of its total budget).
If the agency had known in advance that
demand was more likely to be 75,000 people
in the next year, it could have set a selfsustaining price of $13.33 for each license.
The Department devotes significant
internal resources to monitoring current
demand for consular services and
forecasting future demand. After
reviewing its own historical data and
conferring with its CoSS consultants
from the team led by The QED Group,
the Department developed a range of
demand scenarios for each service or
product that it ran through its model.
From this range, the Department
deliberated and, based on historical
demand and experience, chose the most
likely demand scenario for each service
or product. It then used this demand
scenario to populate the final version of
the CoSS.
These estimates took into account,
among other factors, the likely impact of
the global economic downturn on
demand for consular services.
Using the activities listed above as
examples, the Department forecasted
that it will receive in FY 2010:
—A total of 13,618,092 applications for
passport products, an 18.5% decrease
from actual figures in FY 2008, the
last full year available to the
Department at the time it modeled the
fees proposed in the rules at issue in
this notice, and a year in which
impending Western Hemisphere
Travel Initiative (WHTI)
implementation resulted in very high
demand;
—217,576 applications for extra
passport pages, a 5.3% decrease from
FY 2008 due to the post-WHTI
decrease in overall demand for
passport products;
—5,787,040 applications for
nonimmigrant visas that do not
require a petition, a 10.6% decrease
from FY 2008 due to the addition of
eight countries to the Visa Waiver
Program and the effects of the global
economic downturn;
—98,077 applications for K1-category
´
fiancé(e) visas, a 10.7% decrease from
FY 2008 due to the decrease in overall
demand for visas resulting from the
global economic downturn;
—543 requests for processing of letters
rogatory and Foreign Sovereign
Immunities Act (FSIA) judicial
assistance cases, a 20.9% increase
from FY 2008 based on the historical
rates of increase for judicial services
requests.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14115
Running the Data Through the CoSS
Model
The costs the Department entered into
the CoSS model included every line
item of costs for the Department,
including items such as physical
material for making passports and visas,
salaries, rent, supplies, travel, and so
forth. The Department then determined
a resource driver (from, for example, the
responses to the overseas survey, data
from the passport agency task report,
etc.) for each of these costs, as discussed
in the ‘‘Assigning Costs’’ section above,
and entered the resource drivers and
assignments into the model. This
allowed the model to calculate the
activity cost for each activity. The
Department then selected an activity
driver, such as the volume data from
CWSS discussed above, for each
activity, in order to assign these costs to
each service type. This process allowed
the model to calculate a total cost for
each of the Schedule of Fees’ line items
for visa services, passport services, and
overseas citizen services. The model
then divided this total cost by the total
volume of the service or product in
question in order to determine a final
unit cost for the service or product for
the historical base year. Projected cost
increases for predictive years were also
included to take account of changes
inter alia in the size of consular staff,
the exchange rates, inflation, and cost of
living factors. At this stage, the final
demand projections discussed in the
‘‘Scenario Planning’’ section above were
applied to each appropriate element in
the model using business rules that
allowed the model to project unit costs
for future years. The calculation of these
costs allowed the Department to
determine the appropriate fee to
propose. As this series of calculations
demonstrates, the CoSS is an extremely
complex yet comprehensive model that
captures historical costs while
attempting to predict future costs based
on the Department’s best knowledge and
predictive abilities.
Conclusion
Based on the information outlined
and explained above, the Department
believes these fees are entirely
consistent with the objective in OMB
Circular A–25 to ‘‘promote efficient
allocation of the Nation’s resources by
establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least
as great as costs to the Government of
providing the special benefits * * *.’’
OMB Circular A–25, ¶ 5(b). The
Department takes seriously its
obligation to be a good steward of public
resources (including user fees) and
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
14116
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
understands clearly the important role it
plays in encouraging and enabling
international trade and commerce.
As noted above, the Department
determined its proposed fees using a
federally approved fee-setting model—
activity-based costing—developed with
the assistance of independent
professional consultants experienced in
activity-based cost modeling, and
believes that these proposed fees will be
self-sustaining when implemented.
Moreover, the Department continues to
refine and update the CoSS so it can
regularly monitor its fees and make
adjustments as required to continue to
set fees commensurate with what it
costs the Department to provide the
service in question.
Dated: March 18, 2010.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–6490 Filed 3–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–0587; FRL–9130–1]
Approval of Implementation Plans of
Wisconsin: Nitrogen Oxides
Reasonably Available Control
Technology
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
June 12, 2007 and on September 14,
2009. These revisions incorporate
provisions related to the
implementation of nitrogen oxides
(NOX) Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for major sources in
the Milwaukee-Racine and Sheboygan
ozone nonattainment areas. EPA is
proposing to approve SIP revisions that
address the requirements found in
section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). EPA is also proposing to approve
other miscellaneous rule changes that
affect NOX regulations that were
previously adopted and approved into
the SIP.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2007–0587, by one of the
following methods:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:08 Mar 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385–5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Acting
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico,
Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2007–
0587. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of
encryption and should be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket
visit the EPA Docket Center homepage
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Douglas
Aburano, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–6960, before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Aburano, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6960,
aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To Take?
II. W hat Are the NOX RACT Requirements?
III. Analysis of Wisconsin’s NOX RACT
Submittal
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To
Take?
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA.
NOX RACT Approval
EPA is proposing to approve revisions
to Wisconsin’s SIP, submitted on June
12, 2007 and on September 14, 2009.
The CAA amendments of 1990
introduced the requirement for existing
major stationary sources of NOX in
nonattainment areas to install and
operate NOX RACT. Specifically, section
182(b)(2) of the CAA requires States to
adopt RACT for all major sources of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) in
ozone nonattainment areas; section
182(f) extends the RACT provisions to
major stationary sources of NOX.
Wisconsin was not required to adopt
NOX RACT rules under the 1-hour
ozone standard because all of the ozone
nonattainment areas in Wisconsin were
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 24, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14111-14116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6490]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 22
[Public Notice: 6928]
RIN 1400-AC57 and 1400-AC58
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State (``Department'') published two
proposed rules in the Federal Register on December 14, 2009, and
February 9, 2010, proposing to amend the Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services. In this supplemental proposed rule, the Department of State
is providing additional supplementary information regarding the Cost of
Survey Study (CoSS), the activity-based costing model that the
Department used to determine the fees for consular services proposed
in. The Department is also re-opening the comment periods on both
proposed rules for an additional 15 days.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before 15 days from the
date of publication in the Federal Register.
[[Page 14112]]
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by any of the
following methods:
Persons with access to the Internet may view this notice
and submit comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/index.cfm.
Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM): U.S. Department of State,
Office of the Executive Director, Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S.
Department of State, Suite H1001, 2401 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20520.
E-mail: fees@state.gov. You must include the RIN (either
1400-AC57 or 1400-AC58, or both) in the subject line of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Kline, Office of the Comptroller,
Bureau of Consular Affairs, phone (202) 663-2513. E-mail:
fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of State (``Department'') published two proposed
rules in the Federal Register on December 14, 2009 (74 FR 66076, Public
Notice 6851, RIN 1400-AC57), and on February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6321,
Public Notice 6887, RIN 1400-AC58), proposing to amend sections of part
22 of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Schedule of Fees
for Consular Services. The Department's proposed rules solicited
comments, and a number of comments requested additional detail on the
Consular Services Cost of Service Study (CoSS) as well as time to
comment on that detail. In response, the Department is providing the
additional written detail below.
Additional Detail on the Cost of Service Study
Activity-Based Costing Generally
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25 states that it
is the objective of the United States Government to ``(a) ensure that
each service, sale, or use of Government goods or resources provided by
an agency to specific recipients be self-sustaining; [and] (b) promote
efficient allocation of the Nation's resources by establishing charges
for special benefits provided to the recipient that are at least as
great as costs to the Government of providing the special benefits * *
*.'' OMB Circular A-25, ] 5(a)-(b); see also 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A)
(agency ``may prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a
service or thing of value provided by the agency * * * based on * * *
the costs to the Government * * *.''). To set prices that are ``self-
sustaining,'' the Department must determine the true cost of providing
consular services. Following guidance provided in Statement 4
of OMB's Statement of Federal Accounting Standards (SFFAS), available
at https://www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf, the Department chose to
develop and use an activity-based costing (ABC) model to determine the
true cost of the services listed in its Schedule of Fees, both those
whose fee the Department proposes to change, as well as those whose fee
will remain unchanged from prior years. The Department refers to the
specific ABC model that underpins the proposed fees in the above-
referenced rules as the ``Cost of Service Study'' or ``CoSS.''
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) defines activity-based
costing as a ``set of accounting methods used to identify and describe
costs and required resources for activities within processes.'' Because
an organization can use the same staff and resources (computer
equipment, production facilities, etc.) to produce multiple products or
services, ABC models seek to precisely identify and assign costs to
processes and activities and then to individual products and services
through the identification of key cost drivers referred to as
``resource drivers'' and ``activity drivers.''
Example: Imagine a government agency that has a single facility
it uses to prepare and issue a single product--a driver's license.
In this simple scenario, every cost associated with that facility
(the salaries of employees, the electricity to power the computer
terminals, the cost of a blank driver's license, etc.) can be
attributed directly to the cost of producing that single item. If
that agency wants to ensure that it is charging a ``self-
sustaining'' price for driver's licenses, it only has to divide its
total costs for a given time period by an estimate of the number of
driver's licenses to be produced during that same time period.
However, if that agency issues multiple products (driver's
licenses, non-driver ID cards, etc.), has employees that work on
other activities besides licenses (for example, accepting payment
for traffic tickets), and operates out of multiple facilities it
shares with other agencies, it becomes much more complex for the
agency to determine exactly how much it costs to produce any single
product. In those instances, the agency would need to know what
percent of time its employees spend on each service and how much of
its overhead (rent, utilities, facilities maintenance, etc.) are
consumed in delivering each service to determine the cost of
producing each of its various products--the driver's license, the
non-driver ID card, etc. Using an ABC model would allow the agency
to develop those costs.
Components of Activity-Based Costing
As noted in SFFAS Statement 4, ``activity-based costing
has gained broad acceptance by manufacturing and service industries as
an effective managerial tool.'' SSFAS Statement 4, ] 147.
There are no ``off-the-shelf'' ABC models that allow the Department (or
any other entity) to simply populate a few data points and generate an
answer. ABC models require financial and accounting analysis and
modeling skills combined with a detailed understanding of all the
organization's business processes, which, in an entity the size of the
Department's Bureau of Consular Affairs, are exceedingly complex. More
specifically, ABC models require an organization to:
Identify all of the activities that are required to
produce a particular product or service (``activities'');
Identify all of the resources consumed (costs) in the
course of producing that product or service (``resources'');
Measure the quantity of resources consumed (``resource
driver''); and
Measure the frequency and intensity of demand placed on
activities to produce services (``activity driver'').
For more information, SFFAS Statement 4 provides a
detailed discussion of the use of cost accounting by the U.S.
Government.
Example: To consume a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, a
person might engage in multiple activities: grocery shopping,
sandwich making, sandwich eating, and kitchen cleaning. Each of
these activities consumes resources: grocery shopping, for example,
requires gas to drive to the store, time to make the trip, and money
to buy the peanut butter, jelly, and bread. A person might be able
to make 25 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with a single jar of
peanut butter; as a result, the resource driver for peanut butter
would be 1/25th of a jar of peanut butter. If a person chooses to
eat two peanut butter and jelly sandwiches at a meal, the activity
driver for ``kitchen cleaning'' would be \1/2\ since the person
would eat two sandwiches, but only have to clean the kitchen once.
Although the Department has used a sophisticated and detailed ABC
model to set fees for a number of years, in its October 10, 2007,
report ``Transparent Cost Estimates Needed to Support Passport
Execution Fee Decisions,'' available at https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-63, the GAO asked the Department to expand the sophistication of
its cost model by identifying even more discrete activities and
modeling a broader array of products and services. To provide this
additional detail, the Department launched a multi-year plan to refine
the CoSS with the help of a team of experienced outside consultants led
by The QED Group, LLC, and including Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. as a
[[Page 14113]]
subcontractor. The consultant team was made up of experts in cost
modeling capable of providing an objective, outside assessment of
costs.
Consular Service Activities
Working with its consultants, the Department reviewed all of its
consular operations and identified 262 distinct activities--including
77 visa-specific activities, 11 passport-specific activities, 58
activities specific to overseas citizen services, and 116 cross-cutting
activities (such as cashiering, fraud prevention, and public affairs
outreach). This list includes more than five times as many activities
than the Department's cost model from the prior CoSS, which broke out
52 activities. The Department provides the following examples of some
of the activities that make up a consular operation to illustrate the
substantial complexity that the CoSS must be capable of taking into
account:
Processing a passport book (Items 1, 2a/2b, and 2g of the
proposed Schedule of Fees). Fifty-two separate CoSS activities are
required to process a first-time application for a passport book,
including the following actions:
--Public outreach, such as maintaining passport information on the
Department's Web site (https://travel.state.gov) and operating
appointment systems for our passport agencies;
--Answering phone and written inquiries from the public regarding
passport rules and pending applications;
--Nine separate activities related to data entry of applications, from
capturing applicant photos and processing payment to supervisor audits
of the process;
--Investigation of and coordination with federal law enforcement on
potentially fraudulent applications;
--Actual adjudication of the application;
--Production of the personalized passport itself; and
--Archiving completed applications for future reference.
Adding additional visa pages to a passport (Item 2c of the
proposed Schedule of Fees). Among the 51 activities involved in adding
additional pages to a passport are the following:
--Receiving the application and entering data from it into the system;
--Performing a name check for the applicant and reviewing the results
to determine if there any legal impediments to providing the service,
such as an outstanding federal warrant for the applicant's arrest;
--Physically affixing the pages to the passport; and
--Auditing of the process by a supervisor.
Processing a non-petition-based machine-readable
nonimmigrant visa (MRV) (Item 21a of the proposed schedule of fees).
Ninety-nine CoSS activities are required in processing an application
for a non-petition-based MRV, such as a tourist visa, including:
--Public outreach, such as responding to public inquiries as to the
status of MRV applications;
--Conducting an interview of the MRV applicant;
--Collecting biometrics from the MRV applicant;
--Actual adjudication of the application;
--Requesting advisory opinions from attorneys at headquarters regarding
how specific laws and regulations apply to complicated applications;
--Requesting security advisory opinions from headquarters about
applicants the consular officer believes may present a risk to U.S.
national security;
--Investigating possible fraud in those applications; and
--Producing the actual, physical visa, affixing it to the applicant's
passport, and returning that product to the applicant.
Processing a fiancé(e) (K category) MRV (Item 21d).
One hundred and three CoSS activities are required to process an
application for a K1-category fiancé(e) nonimmigrant visa,
including:
--Pre-processing of the case at the National Visa Center, where the
petition is received from the Department of Homeland Security, packaged
and assigned to the appropriate embassy or consulate; and
--Intake and review of materials required for a K visa that are not
required for other nonimmigrant visas, such as the I-134 affidavit of
support and the DS-2054 medical examination report;
--Conducting an interview of the K visa applicant;
--Collecting biometrics from the K visa applicant;
--Actual adjudication of the application;
--Requesting legal opinions from headquarters as necessary;
--Investigating possible fraud in those applications; and
--Producing the physical visa, affixing it to the applicant's passport,
and returning that product to the applicant.
Processing a letter rogatory (Item 51). Sixty CoSS
activities are required to service a request for a letter rogatory,
covering actions including:
--Receipt of the request at headquarters and dispatch of a telegram to
an embassy or consulate instructing that the service be initiated;
--Preparation of a diplomatic note to be sent to the appropriate
foreign government; and
--Monitoring the case as it progresses through foreign government
channels, and regularly updating the customer on the status of the
case.
By taking the 52 activities from the prior CoSS and breaking them
down further into 262 activities in the current CoSS, the Department
was able to model its costs much more precisely. As a result, the
Department was able to identify differences in both resource drivers
and activity drivers that had previously been obscured. For example,
the Department has better data now on how much additional time a
consular officer spends on reviewing the case file for a K
fiancé(e) visa (resource driver) as well as how much more
frequently an officer seeks assistance from fraud prevention resources
as part of a K visa application (activity driver) compared to a
standard tourist visa application. Not surprisingly, this additional
detail has dramatically increased the complexity of the CoSS because
the Department now matches costs with activities at a more granular
level.
Determining the Cost of Performing Each Consular Activity
After defining each activity, the Department used the CoSS model to
determine the total costs to perform that activity. As noted in SFFAS
Statement 4, ``[d]epending on feasibility and cost-benefit
considerations, resource costs may be assigned to activities in three
ways: (a) Direct tracing; (b) estimation based on surveys, interviews,
or statistical sampling; or (c) allocations.'' SSFAS Statement
4, ] 149(2).
Direct trace costs are quite obvious and easy to identify. For the
activities listed above they include, for example, what the Department
pays for each physical passport book, the paper affixed to the book of
a customer who requests additional pages, or the visa foil that is
placed into an applicant's passport.
Determining how to assign other types of costs to activities is
much more difficult than direct trace costs since an employee or
resource may be involved in many different activities or processes. To
give a few examples from among the large number of factors that go into
determining ``assigned costs'' for the scores of consular services,
such costs would include how much time a passport specialist spent to
adjudicate a particular passport application; how
[[Page 14114]]
much time a passport agency employee spent processing payment for a
passport; how much time another employee spent performing a quality-
control check on this and other passport work; how much time a consular
officer at an embassy or consulate spent interviewing a visa applicant,
and another employee spent taking the applicant's fingerprints; how
much time that officer then spent adjudicating the visa application;
how much time the fraud unit spent investigating whether bank documents
submitted in a visa application are fraudulent; and how much time legal
staff at headquarters spent determining whether an individual's claim
to citizenship is adequately documented.
Finally, the third set of costs, allocated costs, is neither
obvious nor easy to trace. With assigned costs, the entire amount is
counted as a consular cost and the decision is what share of that cost
should be assigned to what activity. In determining allocated costs,
only a portion of the whole are included in the model because only that
portion can be assigned to consular activities. One example of this is
the Department's Bureau of Human Resources, which provides services to
all of the Department. The CoSS model includes only a portion of that
Bureau's costs, based on the percentage of Department employees who
perform consular work. To provide another example, when considering the
cost to keep a particular facility (embassy, consulate, passport
agency, etc.) functioning, the Department first determined what portion
of that facility is used to provide consular services, and then
allocated within the CoSS model how much of that smaller amount should
be charged to the activities associated with providing a given customer
with a given service--such as a passport or a nonimmigrant visa--at
that location.
The Department estimates that, on the whole, 19.6% of its consular
costs are direct trace, 60.7% are assigned costs, and the remaining
19.7% are allocated costs, although the exact breakdown of these costs
varies by activity. Given that such a high percentage of the
Department's costs are assigned or allocated costs, the Department
devoted substantial efforts to modeling these costs.
Assigning Costs
To assign labor costs, the Department relied on a variety of
industry standard estimation methodologies. For example, the Department
analyzed passport agency task reports to determine how much time
passport specialists working at a passport agency devote to particular
tasks--for example, time spent serving customers in the window versus
time spent in training or performing administrative duties versus time
spent actually adjudicating passports. To estimate how much time
consular officers overseas spend on consular activities, the Department
asked consular officers at 200 overseas posts to complete a 98-question
survey. This survey asked Consular Affairs personnel to break out the
time they spend on each consular activity they perform during a typical
month--visa interviews, visa adjudication, passport adjudication,
performing welfare and whereabouts visits, responding to judicial
assistance requests from American citizens abroad, notarizing documents
for American citizens abroad, issuing consular reports of birth abroad,
and so forth. The responses to the survey were then used to develop
resource drivers to assign labor costs to activities. To give one
example, in the survey responses, foreign service national (FSN)
employees in Mumbai, India, indicated that as a whole they spent 6,586
hours on consular activities in a typical month, of which 955 hours
(14.5% of their time) were spent on performing nonimmigrant visa
application intake. Total annual compensation for Mumbai FSNs was
$783,988. Based on the percentage calculated above, 14.5% of their
compensation, or $113,678, was calculated as the cost of this one
activity for this one post for this one labor category.
To assign activity costs to the individual services, the Department
extracted volume data by product type from its data systems. For
example, to determine how to assign the costs of adjudicating
nonimmigrant visas, the Department analyzed the volume of nonimmigrant
visas issued by category (B, H, K, L, and so forth) for a given time
period, which in turn became the activity driver for this data. For
activities at embassies and consulates abroad, this volume data is
collected from the ``Consular Package'' every consular section submits
annually via the Internet-based Consular Workload Statistics System
(CWSS). For more than 30 years, the Consular Package has been the
single most important document consular managers use to report, plan,
and budget for consular operations, and is the key document linking
consular objectives to resource and personnel requirements. CWSS
collects and evaluates data from 239 individual consular sections in
consulates and embassies worldwide, and provides customizable reports
of available data. CWSS is designed to provide the most comprehensive
picture of each post's consular operations and cumulatively of
embassies and consulates by region and worldwide. It provides an
overview of the volume and nature of the embassy's or consulate's
consular workload; personnel and work hours devoted to it; the
challenges faced; and the outlook for the future. These reports yield a
wealth of data and are an exceptionally valuable management tool for
determining consular resource needs. Volume data for all consular
services the Department provides at its embassies and consulates
overseas--passport and citizenship services, emergency services to
American citizens, nonimmigrant and immigrant visa services, judicial
services, etc.--is captured from the CWSS. Using the Mumbai example
above, the costs for the processing of nonimmigrant visa application
intake activity were assigned to nonimmigrant visas according to volume
by visa category, as collected from the CWSS--an activity driver
referred to as ``nonimmigrant visa applications.'' Of the 253,394
nonimmigrant visas issued in Mumbai during FY 2008, 209,120 (82.5%) of
them were ``base MRVs,'' that is non-petition-based nonimmigrant visas
(excluding the E category). Thus, 82.5% of the FSN costs for this
activity ($93,784 of the $113,678 total) were assigned to ``base MRVs''
for this one cost element.
For consular activities that take place in the United States, the
Department collects volume data from periodic workload reports
pertaining to the passport or visa facilities in question. For example,
for volume data on the processing of passport applications or requests
for additional pages submitted to one of the many passport agencies in
cities across the United States, the Department collects volume data
from monthly workload reports pulled from the passport management
information system, a management database.
After collecting and analyzing all available cost and workload
data, the Department converted this raw data into resource drivers and
activity drivers for each resource and activity. The resulting 14-
gigabyte database constitutes the CoSS model. Because the CoSS is a
complex series of iterative computer processes incorporating more than
a million calculations, it cannot itself be reduced to a tangible form
such as a document, notwithstanding the use of the word ``study'' in
the term ``cost of service study.''
The final component required to determine unit costs is ``scenario
planning,'' described in the following section.
[[Page 14115]]
Scenario Planning
Scenario planning allowed the Department to predict levels of
future demand for specific services and evaluated their impact on unit
costs. Without scenario planning, an activity-based costing model can
only determine historical costs, or how much it cost to produce
something in the past. As there is no mechanism for the Department to
charge retroactive fees to recipients of prior services, and in
accordance with OMB objectives, the Department endeavors to determine a
``self-sustaining'' price for future service delivery. OMB Circular A-
25, ] 5(a). Through scenario planning, the Department can convert
historical data about service costs into forward-looking estimates of
how much a service will cost in the future.
Private industry has significantly greater flexibility in altering
its personnel and overhead costs based on changes in demand than do
government agencies. As roughly 70% of the workforce involved in
providing consular services are full-time federal employees, if demand
for a service falls precipitously, the Department cannot shed employees
as quickly as the private sector. (For that matter, should demand rise
precipitously, the Department cannot add employees as quickly, since
delivering the vast majority of consular services requires specially
trained employees, and these persons cannot begin their training until
they have completed the federal hiring process and passed a security
clearance.) Additionally, given government procurement rules and
security requirements, the Department commits to many of its facilities
and infrastructure costs years before a facility comes online. Even if
demand changes, the Department is still obligated to cover these costs.
As a result, when setting fees, the Department must assume that the
majority of its short-term costs cannot drop significantly. Given these
and other constraints on altering the Department's cost structure in
the short term, changes in service volumes can have dramatic effects on
whether a fee is ``self-sustaining,'' and forecasting demand becomes
crucial.
Example: In the original example above involving the issuance
of driver's licenses, assume that the agency is obligated to spend
$1 million per year on staff and facilities costs regardless of how
many applicants apply for a driver's license. If that agency
believes 100,000 people will apply for a driver's license next year,
then charging $10 for each driver's license would be a ``self-
sustaining'' fee. However, if only 75,000 people actually applied
for a $10 driver's license, the agency would face a $250,000 budget
shortfall (or 25% of its total budget). If the agency had known in
advance that demand was more likely to be 75,000 people in the next
year, it could have set a self-sustaining price of $13.33 for each
license.
The Department devotes significant internal resources to monitoring
current demand for consular services and forecasting future demand.
After reviewing its own historical data and conferring with its CoSS
consultants from the team led by The QED Group, the Department
developed a range of demand scenarios for each service or product that
it ran through its model. From this range, the Department deliberated
and, based on historical demand and experience, chose the most likely
demand scenario for each service or product. It then used this demand
scenario to populate the final version of the CoSS.
These estimates took into account, among other factors, the likely
impact of the global economic downturn on demand for consular services.
Using the activities listed above as examples, the Department
forecasted that it will receive in FY 2010:
--A total of 13,618,092 applications for passport products, an 18.5%
decrease from actual figures in FY 2008, the last full year available
to the Department at the time it modeled the fees proposed in the rules
at issue in this notice, and a year in which impending Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) implementation resulted in very
high demand;
--217,576 applications for extra passport pages, a 5.3% decrease from
FY 2008 due to the post-WHTI decrease in overall demand for passport
products;
--5,787,040 applications for nonimmigrant visas that do not require a
petition, a 10.6% decrease from FY 2008 due to the addition of eight
countries to the Visa Waiver Program and the effects of the global
economic downturn;
--98,077 applications for K1-category fiancé(e) visas, a 10.7%
decrease from FY 2008 due to the decrease in overall demand for visas
resulting from the global economic downturn;
--543 requests for processing of letters rogatory and Foreign Sovereign
Immunities Act (FSIA) judicial assistance cases, a 20.9% increase from
FY 2008 based on the historical rates of increase for judicial services
requests.
Running the Data Through the CoSS Model
The costs the Department entered into the CoSS model included every
line item of costs for the Department, including items such as physical
material for making passports and visas, salaries, rent, supplies,
travel, and so forth. The Department then determined a resource driver
(from, for example, the responses to the overseas survey, data from the
passport agency task report, etc.) for each of these costs, as
discussed in the ``Assigning Costs'' section above, and entered the
resource drivers and assignments into the model. This allowed the model
to calculate the activity cost for each activity. The Department then
selected an activity driver, such as the volume data from CWSS
discussed above, for each activity, in order to assign these costs to
each service type. This process allowed the model to calculate a total
cost for each of the Schedule of Fees' line items for visa services,
passport services, and overseas citizen services. The model then
divided this total cost by the total volume of the service or product
in question in order to determine a final unit cost for the service or
product for the historical base year. Projected cost increases for
predictive years were also included to take account of changes inter
alia in the size of consular staff, the exchange rates, inflation, and
cost of living factors. At this stage, the final demand projections
discussed in the ``Scenario Planning'' section above were applied to
each appropriate element in the model using business rules that allowed
the model to project unit costs for future years. The calculation of
these costs allowed the Department to determine the appropriate fee to
propose. As this series of calculations demonstrates, the CoSS is an
extremely complex yet comprehensive model that captures historical
costs while attempting to predict future costs based on the
Department's best knowledge and predictive abilities.
Conclusion
Based on the information outlined and explained above, the
Department believes these fees are entirely consistent with the
objective in OMB Circular A-25 to ``promote efficient allocation of the
Nation's resources by establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least as great as costs to the
Government of providing the special benefits * * *.'' OMB Circular A-
25, ] 5(b). The Department takes seriously its obligation to be a good
steward of public resources (including user fees) and
[[Page 14116]]
understands clearly the important role it plays in encouraging and
enabling international trade and commerce.
As noted above, the Department determined its proposed fees using a
federally approved fee-setting model--activity-based costing--developed
with the assistance of independent professional consultants experienced
in activity-based cost modeling, and believes that these proposed fees
will be self-sustaining when implemented. Moreover, the Department
continues to refine and update the CoSS so it can regularly monitor its
fees and make adjustments as required to continue to set fees
commensurate with what it costs the Department to provide the service
in question.
Dated: March 18, 2010.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-6490 Filed 3-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P