Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone, 13707-13710 [2010-6294]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications for
which we would prepare a Federalism
Assessment.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 13 U.S.C.; 18
U.S.C. 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4942,
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to conduct
occurring on or after November 1, 1987),
5006–5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984, as to
conduct occurring after that date), 5039; 28
U.S.C. 509, 510; 31 U.S.C. 3711(f); 5 CFR part
297.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation.
By approving it, the Director certifies
that it will not have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities because: This
rule is about the correctional
management of offenders committed to
the custody of the Attorney General or
the Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
and its economic impact is limited to
the Bureau’s appropriated funds.
§ 513.40
File.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not cause State, local
and Tribal governments, or the private
sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in
any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. We do not need to take
action under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 513
Prisoners.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in
the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C 301; 28
U.S.C. 509, 510 and delegated to the
Director, Bureau of Prisons in 28 CFR
0.96, we propose to amend 28 CFR part
513, subpart D, as follows.
SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
2. Revise § 513.40(a) as follows:
Inmate access to Inmate Central
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Inmate review of his/her Inmate
Central File. (1) Request to review
Inmate Central File. An inmate may at
any time request to review all
disclosable portions of his/her Inmate
Central File by submitting a request to
a staff member designated by the
Warden. Staff are to acknowledge the
request and schedule the inmate, as
promptly as is practical, for a review of
the file at a time which will not disrupt
institution operations.
(2) Pre-Sentence Investigation
Reports, Statements of Reason, or other
similar documents. Inmates incarcerated
in Bureau facilities, including those in
contract facilities or community
confinement, are prohibited from
possessing their Pre-Sentence
Investigation Reports (PSRs), Statements
of Reasons (SORs), or other similar
sentencing documents from criminal
judgments.
(i) Sentenced inmates in Bureau
facilities, including those in contract
facilities or community confinement,
may request an opportunity to review
these documents and take notes, but
will not be permitted to possess copies
of these documents.
(ii) Pretrial inmates in Bureau
facilities, including those in contract
facilities or community confinement,
may possess and review these
documents in preparation for
sentencing.
(iii) Persons other than the inmate
may not obtain copies of inmate PSRs,
SORs, or other similar documents from
the Bureau while the inmate is
incarcerated in a Bureau facility,
including those in contract facilities or
community confinement, even if they
provide written authorization from the
inmate. Such persons may request these
documents directly from the sentencing
court, defense counsel, or U.S.
Probation Office.
PART 513—ACCESS TO RECORDS
[FR Doc. 2010–6288 Filed 3–22–10; 8:45 am]
1. Revise the authority citation for 28
CFR part 513 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Mar 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13707
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0129]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
amend the regulations establishing
permanent safety zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan zone during
annual events. When these safety zones
are activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, this rule would restrict
vessels from portions of water areas
during annual events that pose a hazard
to public safety. The safety zones
amended by this proposed rule are
necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays, boat races, and other events.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0129 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard,
Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI,
telephone (414) 747–7154, e-mail
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
13708
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Viewing Comments and Documents
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0129),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0129’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Mar 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Discussion of Proposed Rule
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0129’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
This proposed rule will revise the
location of three permanent safety zones
to reflect the correct enforcement area,
and add two permanent safety zones for
already established annually occurring
events in the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan zone. The proposed rule is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and people during annual marine events
in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
area of responsibility.
The proposed safety zones will be
enforced only immediately before,
during, and after events that pose
hazard to the public, and only upon
notice by the Captain of the Port.
The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan will notify the public that the
zones in this proposal are or will be
enforced by all appropriate means to the
affected segments of the public
including publication in the Federal
Register as practicable, in accordance
with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means of
notification may also include, but are
not limited to Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying
the public when enforcement of the
safety zone established by this section is
cancelled.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated
representative. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
their designated representative. The
Captain of the Port or their designated
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one by using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact BM1 Adam
Kraft at the telephone number or e-mail
address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Background and Purpose
This proposed rule will amend the
regulations establishing safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
zone during annual events. These safety
zones are necessary to protect vessels
and people from the hazards associated
with firework displays, boat races, and
other marine events. Such hazards
include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause marine casualties and
the explosive danger of fireworks and
debris falling into the water that may
cause death or serious bodily harm.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. The Coast Guard’s use of
these safety zones will be periodic, of
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
short duration, and designed to
minimize the impact on navigable
waters. These safety zones will only be
enforced immediately before, during,
and after the time the events occur.
Furthermore, these safety zones have
been designed to allow vessels to transit
unrestricted to portions of the
waterways not affected by the safety
zones. The Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the activation of these safety zones.
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact BM1 Adam
Kraft, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard Sector Lake Michigan,
Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–7154. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the areas designated as
safety zones during the dates and times
the safety zones are being enforced.
These safety zones would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Each safety zone
in this proposed rule will be in effect for
a short period of time and only once per
year. These safety zones have been
designed to allow traffic to pass safely
around the zone whenever possible and
vessels will be allowed to pass through
the zones with the permission of the
Captain of the Port.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
This proposed rule calls for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Mar 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Collection of Information
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not affect the
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13709
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
We invite your comments on how this
proposed rule might impact tribal
governments, even if that impact may
not constitute a ‘‘tribal implication’’
under the Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
13710
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. This
proposed rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g) of the
Instruction. This proposed rule amends
permanent safety zones established in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
Zone to protect the public from the
hazards associated during annual
events. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.929 to revise
(a)(15)(i), (a)(52)(i), and (a)(65)(i); and to
add paragraphs (a)(82) and (a)(83) to
read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
§ 165.929 Safety Zones; Annual events
requiring safety zones in the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan zone.
(a) * * *
(15) Taste of Chicago Fireworks;
Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe
Harbor and all waters of Lake Michigan
bounded by a line drawn from 41°53′24″
N, 087°35′59″ W; then east to 41°53′15″
N, 087°35′26″ W; then south to
41°52′49″ N, 087°35′26″ W; then
southwest to 41°52′27″ N, 087°36′37″ W;
then north to 41°53′15″ N, 087°36′33″
W; then east returning to the point of
origin. (NAD 83)
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Mar 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
(52) Gary Air and Water Show; Gary,
IN.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from
41°37′42″ N, 087°16′38″ W; then east to
41°37′54″ N, 087°14′00″ W; then south
to 41°37′30″ N, 087°13′56″ W; then west
to 41°37′17″ N, 087°16′36″ W; then
north returning to the point of origin.
(NAD 83)
*
*
*
*
*
(65) Venetian Night Fireworks;
Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe
Harbor and all waters of Lake Michigan
bounded by a line drawn from 41°53′03″
N, 087°36′36″ W; then east to 41°53′03″
N, 087°36′21″ W; then south to
41°52′27″ N, 087°36′21″ W; then west to
41°52′27″ N, 087°36′37″ W; then north
returning to the point of origin. (NAD
83)
*
*
*
*
*
(82) Cochrane Cup; Blue Island, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of the Calumet
Sag Channel from the South Halstead
Street Bridge at 41°39′27″ N, 087°38′29″
W; to the Crawford Avenue Bridge at
41°39′05″ N, 087°43′08″ W; and the
Little Calumet River from the Ashland
Avenue Bridge at 41°39′7″ N, 087°39′38″
W; to the junction of the Calumet Sag
Channel at 41°39′23″ N, 087°39′ W
(NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The
first Saturday of May; 6:30 a.m. to
5 p.m.
*
*
*
*
*
(83) World War II Beach Invasion Reenactment; St. Joseph, MI.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake
Michigan in the vicinity of Tiscornia
Park in St. Joseph, MI beginning at
42°06.55N, 086°29.23W; then west/
northwest along the north breakwater to
42°06.59 N, 086°29.41 W; the northwest
100 yards to 42°07.01 N, 086°29.44 W;
then northeast 2,243 yards to 42°07.50N,
086°28.43 W; the southeast to the
shoreline at 42°07.39N, 086°28.27 W;
then southwest along the shoreline to
the point of origin (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The
third Saturday of June; 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 8, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010–6294 Filed 3–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0172; FRL–9129–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; State of California; PM–10;
Determination of Attainment for the
Coso Junction Nonattainment Area;
Determination Regarding Applicability
of Certain Clean Air Act Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to
determine that the Coso Junction
nonattainment area (CJNA) in California
has attained the 24-hour National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal
to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM–10).
This proposed determination is based
upon monitored air quality data for the
PM–10 NAAQS during the years 2006–
2008. In addition, data for 2009
contained in EPA’s Air Quality System
(AQS) shows the CJNA continued to
attain the PM–10 NAAQS through 2009,
and preliminary data for 2010 available
to date show no exceedances of the 24hour NAAQS have been recorded at the
CJNA monitoring site. EPA is also
proposing to determine that, because the
CJNA has attained the PM–10 NAAQS,
the obligation to make submissions to
meet certain Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act) requirements is not applicable for
as long as the CJNA continues to attain
the PM–10 NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2010–0172, by one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
(2) E-mail: mahdavi.sarvy@epa.gov.
(3) Mail or deliver: Sarvy Mahdavi
(AIR–2), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13707-13710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6294]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0129]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the regulations establishing
permanent safety zones in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone
during annual events. When these safety zones are activated, and thus
subject to enforcement, this rule would restrict vessels from portions
of water areas during annual events that pose a hazard to public
safety. The safety zones amended by this proposed rule are necessary to
protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays, boat races, and other events.
DATES: Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0129 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Adam Kraft, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard, Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI, telephone (414) 747-7154,
e-mail Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting
[[Page 13708]]
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0129), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0129'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0129'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one by using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact BM1 Adam Kraft at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Background and Purpose
This proposed rule will amend the regulations establishing safety
zones in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone during annual
events. These safety zones are necessary to protect vessels and people
from the hazards associated with firework displays, boat races, and
other marine events. Such hazards include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause marine casualties and the explosive danger of fireworks
and debris falling into the water that may cause death or serious
bodily harm.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule will revise the location of three permanent
safety zones to reflect the correct enforcement area, and add two
permanent safety zones for already established annually occurring
events in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone. The proposed rule
is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and people during annual
marine events in the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan area of
responsibility.
The proposed safety zones will be enforced only immediately before,
during, and after events that pose hazard to the public, and only upon
notice by the Captain of the Port.
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will notify the public that
the zones in this proposal are or will be enforced by all appropriate
means to the affected segments of the public including publication in
the Federal Register as practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR
165.7(a). Such means of notification may also include, but are not
limited to Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
notifying the public when enforcement of the safety zone established by
this section is cancelled.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative. Entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or their
designated representative. The Captain of the Port or their designated
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. The Coast
Guard's use of these safety zones will be periodic, of
[[Page 13709]]
short duration, and designed to minimize the impact on navigable
waters. These safety zones will only be enforced immediately before,
during, and after the time the events occur. Furthermore, these safety
zones have been designed to allow vessels to transit unrestricted to
portions of the waterways not affected by the safety zones. The Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the
activation of these safety zones.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the areas designated as safety zones
during the dates and times the safety zones are being enforced. These
safety zones would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Each
safety zone in this proposed rule will be in effect for a short period
of time and only once per year. These safety zones have been designed
to allow traffic to pass safely around the zone whenever possible and
vessels will be allowed to pass through the zones with the permission
of the Captain of the Port.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact BM1 Adam Kraft, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414)
747-7154. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule calls for no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not affect the taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. We
invite your comments on how this proposed rule might impact tribal
governments, even if that impact may not constitute a ``tribal
implication'' under the Order.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
[[Page 13710]]
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule is categorically excluded, under figure
2-1, paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction. This proposed rule amends
permanent safety zones established in the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan Zone to protect the public from the hazards associated during
annual events. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend Sec. 165.929 to revise (a)(15)(i), (a)(52)(i), and
(a)(65)(i); and to add paragraphs (a)(82) and (a)(83) to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.929 Safety Zones; Annual events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan zone.
(a) * * *
(15) Taste of Chicago Fireworks; Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe Harbor and all waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from 41[deg]53'24'' N, 087[deg]35'59''
W; then east to 41[deg]53'15'' N, 087[deg]35'26'' W; then south to
41[deg]52'49'' N, 087[deg]35'26'' W; then southwest to 41[deg]52'27''
N, 087[deg]36'37'' W; then north to 41[deg]53'15'' N, 087[deg]36'33''
W; then east returning to the point of origin. (NAD 83)
* * * * *
(52) Gary Air and Water Show; Gary, IN.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan bounded by a line drawn
from 41[deg]37'42'' N, 087[deg]16'38'' W; then east to 41[deg]37'54''
N, 087[deg]14'00'' W; then south to 41[deg]37'30'' N, 087[deg]13'56''
W; then west to 41[deg]37'17'' N, 087[deg]16'36'' W; then north
returning to the point of origin. (NAD 83)
* * * * *
(65) Venetian Night Fireworks; Chicago, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of Monroe Harbor and all waters of Lake
Michigan bounded by a line drawn from 41[deg]53'03'' N, 087[deg]36'36''
W; then east to 41[deg]53'03'' N, 087[deg]36'21'' W; then south to
41[deg]52'27'' N, 087[deg]36'21'' W; then west to 41[deg]52'27'' N,
087[deg]36'37'' W; then north returning to the point of origin. (NAD
83)
* * * * *
(82) Cochrane Cup; Blue Island, IL.
(i) Location. All waters of the Calumet Sag Channel from the South
Halstead Street Bridge at 41[deg]39'27'' N, 087[deg]38'29'' W; to the
Crawford Avenue Bridge at 41[deg]39'05'' N, 087[deg]43'08'' W; and the
Little Calumet River from the Ashland Avenue Bridge at 41[deg]39'7'' N,
087[deg]39'38'' W; to the junction of the Calumet Sag Channel at
41[deg]39'23'' N, 087[deg]39' W (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The first Saturday of May; 6:30
a.m. to 5 p.m.
* * * * *
(83) World War II Beach Invasion Re-enactment; St. Joseph, MI.
(i) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan in the vicinity of
Tiscornia Park in St. Joseph, MI beginning at 42[deg]06.55N,
086[deg]29.23W; then west/northwest along the north breakwater to
42[deg]06.59 N, 086[deg]29.41 W; the northwest 100 yards to
42[deg]07.01 N, 086[deg]29.44 W; then northeast 2,243 yards to
42[deg]07.50N, 086[deg]28.43 W; the southeast to the shoreline at
42[deg]07.39N, 086[deg]28.27 W; then southwest along the shoreline to
the point of origin (NAD 83).
(ii) Enforcement date and time. The third Saturday of June; 8 a.m.
to 2 p.m.
* * * * *
Dated: March 8, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010-6294 Filed 3-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P