Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; Notice of the Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical Conference, 13523-13524 [2010-6163]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Correction
Executive Order 12866: Under
Executive Order 12866, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits
of this regulatory action and have
determined that it is not ‘‘significant’’
under the terms of that Executive order.
We have determined, also, that this
proposed regulatory action does not
unduly interfere with State, local, and
Tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: March 17, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–6229 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services Overview
Information; Migrant and Seasonal
Farmworkers Program
In notice document 2010–5976
beginning on page 13106 in the issue of
Thursday, March 18, 2010 make the
following correction:
On page 13106, in the second column,
under the Applications Available:
heading, in the first line, ‘‘April 2, 2010’’
should read ‘‘March 18, 2010’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2010–5976 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM07–10–002]
Transparency Provisions of Section 23
of the Natural Gas Act; Notice of the
Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical
Conference
March 15, 2010.
In a ‘‘Notice of Technical Conference’’
issued on February 22, 2010 in the
above-referenced proceeding, the
Commission stated that this conference,
to be held on March 25, 2010, will
address select issues identified by staff.
Those issues include: (1)
Inconsistencies in reporting upstream
transactions in the natural gas supply
chain on Form No. 552, and whether
these transactions contribute to
wholesale price formation; (2) whether
transactions involving balancing, cashout, operational, and in-kind
transactions should be reported on Form
No. 552; and (3) whether the units of
measurement (TBtu) currently used for
reporting volumes in the form are
appropriate. The Agenda for this
Technical Conference is attached to this
notice.
Specific questions to each panel are
on the attached Agenda. Each panelist
will be given the opportunity to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13523
a brief introductory statement on these
questions.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
March 25, 2010: Commission Meeting
Room
9 a.m.–9:10 a.m.—Opening Remarks.
9:10 a.m.–10:45 a.m.—Upstream
transactions in the natural gas supply
chain.
1. How has your company addressed
the reporting of unprocessed gas on
Form No. 552?
2. Are there unreported volumes of
unprocessed physical natural gas
(between the wellhead and any
processing plant) that use, contribute to,
or might they contribute to the
formation of daily or monthly gas price
indices? Are the volumes associated
with these transactions material?
3. What effect, if any, will the
development of nontraditional gas
sources have on the reporting on
unprocessed gas?
4. Is the current reporting
measurement (TBtus) an appropriate
measurement? Would reporting volumes
in decatherms be more appropriate?
Panelists
• John Poe, Manager, Regulatory
Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & Power
Marketing Company (Natural Gas
Supply Association).
• William E. Shanahan, Marketing
Manager, Chaparral LLC, (Natural Gas &
Energy Association of Oklahoma).
• Mary Nelson, Manager, Regulatory
Affairs, Devon Energy Corp. (Natural
Gas Supply Association).
• Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory
Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC.
• Representative, Independent
Producers Association of America.
10:45 a.m.–11 a.m.—Break
11 a.m. –12:15 p.m. Cashouts,
Imbalances and Operational Volumes
1. How has your company addressed
the reporting of cashouts, imbalance
makeup and operational volumes on the
Form No. 552 in relation to the total
volumes of physical natural gas
reported?
2. Are the volumes associated with
these transactions material? Please
quantify.
3. Is the current reporting
measurement (TBtus) an appropriate
measurement? Would reporting volumes
in decatherms be more appropriate?
Panelists
• Scott Brewer, Director, North
American Energy, Terra Industries, Inc.
(Process Gas Consumers).
• Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory
Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC.
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
13524
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices
• Matt Kerec, Assistant Commodity
Manager, Alcoa, Inc. (Process Gas
Consumers).
• Michael E. Novak, Assistant
General Manager, Federal Regulatory
Affairs, National Fuel Gas Distribution
Corp. (on behalf of the American Gas
Association).
• John Poe, Manager, Regulatory
Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & Power
Marketing Company (Natural Gas
Supply Association).
• Dena Wiggins, Partner, Ballard
Spahr LLP (Process Gas Consumers
Group).
12:15 p.m.–1:15 p.m.—Lunch
1:15 p.m.–1:45 p.m.—Question and
Answer Period
1:45 p.m.–2 p.m.—Closing Remarks
[FR Doc. 2010–6163 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP10–82–000]
Northern Natural Gas Company,
Southern Natural Gas Company,
Florida Gas Transmission Company,
LLC, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC, Enterprise Field
Services, LLC; Notice of Application
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
March 16, 2010.
Take notice that on March 5, 2010,
Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern Natural), 1111 South 103rd
Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124–1000,
filed on behalf of itself and other
owners, Southern Natural Gas
Company, Florida Gas Transmission
Company, LLC, Transcontinental Gas
Pipe Line Company, LLC, and
Enterprise Field Services, LLC in the
above referenced docket an application
pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the
Commission’s regulations, requesting
authorization to abandon in place
certain facilities, located onshore Texas
and offshore Texas in state and federal
waters, known as the Matagorda
Offshore Pipeline System (MOPS).
Northern Natural states that operation of
MOPS has become uneconomical due to
increasing costs of maintenance and
repairs compared to falling revenues, all
as more fully set forth in the application
which is on file with the Commission
and open to public inspection. The
filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:41 Mar 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TTY, (202)
502–8659.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to Michael
T. Loeffler, Senior Director, Certificates
and External Affairs, Northern Natural
Gas Company, 1111 South 103rd Street,
Omaha, Nebraska 68124, or phone at
(402)398–7103, or e-mail at
mike.loeffler@nngco.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and
to every other party. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: April 6, 2010.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–6232 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP10–76–000]
Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company;
Notice of Application
March 15, 2010.
Take notice that on March 5, 2010,
Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company,
(Eastern Shore), 1110 Forrest Avenue,
Dover, Delaware 19904, pursuant to
section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA), as amended, and Part 157 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (Commission)
Regulations, filed in Docket No. CP10–
76–000, an application to construct and
operate certain pipeline and ancillary
facilities, with appurtenances, located
in the State of Pennsylvania. Eastern
Shore states that it proposes to: (1)
Construct and operate approximately
8.3 miles of sixteen-inch mainline
extension in the State of Pennsylvania,
and (2) construct and operate a new
interconnect receipt point. Eastern
Shore states that such facilities are
necessary to provide new firm
transportation service to customers that
have executed binding shipper
nominations in conjunction with
Eastern Shore’s recent Open Season
(Mainline Extension Interconnect with
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP,
Project), which offered its customers the
opportunity for new natural gas
supplies and supply diversification by
accessing the Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern)
pipeline system in southeastern
Pennsylvania. Eastern Shore estimates
the cost of the facilities will be
$19,406,974, all as more fully set forth
in the application, which is on file with
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 54 (Monday, March 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13523-13524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6163]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM07-10-002]
Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act;
Notice of the Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical Conference
March 15, 2010.
In a ``Notice of Technical Conference'' issued on February 22, 2010
in the above-referenced proceeding, the Commission stated that this
conference, to be held on March 25, 2010, will address select issues
identified by staff. Those issues include: (1) Inconsistencies in
reporting upstream transactions in the natural gas supply chain on Form
No. 552, and whether these transactions contribute to wholesale price
formation; (2) whether transactions involving balancing, cash-out,
operational, and in-kind transactions should be reported on Form No.
552; and (3) whether the units of measurement (TBtu) currently used for
reporting volumes in the form are appropriate. The Agenda for this
Technical Conference is attached to this notice.
Specific questions to each panel are on the attached Agenda. Each
panelist will be given the opportunity to provide a brief introductory
statement on these questions.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
March 25, 2010: Commission Meeting Room
9 a.m.-9:10 a.m.--Opening Remarks.
9:10 a.m.-10:45 a.m.--Upstream transactions in the natural gas supply
chain.
1. How has your company addressed the reporting of unprocessed gas
on Form No. 552?
2. Are there unreported volumes of unprocessed physical natural gas
(between the wellhead and any processing plant) that use, contribute
to, or might they contribute to the formation of daily or monthly gas
price indices? Are the volumes associated with these transactions
material?
3. What effect, if any, will the development of nontraditional gas
sources have on the reporting on unprocessed gas?
4. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate
measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate?
Panelists
John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas &
Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association).
William E. Shanahan, Marketing Manager, Chaparral LLC,
(Natural Gas & Energy Association of Oklahoma).
Mary Nelson, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Devon Energy
Corp. (Natural Gas Supply Association).
Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream
LLC.
Representative, Independent Producers Association of
America.
10:45 a.m.-11 a.m.--Break
11 a.m. -12:15 p.m. Cashouts, Imbalances and Operational Volumes
1. How has your company addressed the reporting of cashouts,
imbalance makeup and operational volumes on the Form No. 552 in
relation to the total volumes of physical natural gas reported?
2. Are the volumes associated with these transactions material?
Please quantify.
3. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate
measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate?
Panelists
Scott Brewer, Director, North American Energy, Terra
Industries, Inc. (Process Gas Consumers).
Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream
LLC.
[[Page 13524]]
Matt Kerec, Assistant Commodity Manager, Alcoa, Inc.
(Process Gas Consumers).
Michael E. Novak, Assistant General Manager, Federal
Regulatory Affairs, National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. (on behalf of
the American Gas Association).
John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas &
Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association).
Dena Wiggins, Partner, Ballard Spahr LLP (Process Gas
Consumers Group).
12:15 p.m.-1:15 p.m.--Lunch
1:15 p.m.-1:45 p.m.--Question and Answer Period
1:45 p.m.-2 p.m.--Closing Remarks
[FR Doc. 2010-6163 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P