Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; Notice of the Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical Conference, 13523-13524 [2010-6163]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal Register. pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are particularly interested in applications that meet the priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)). Final Priority: We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal Register. We will determine the final priority after considering responses to this notice and other information available to the Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements. Correction Executive Order 12866: Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action and have determined that it is not ‘‘significant’’ under the terms of that Executive order. We have determined, also, that this proposed regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance. This document provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this program. Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/ fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:41 Mar 19, 2010 Jkt 220001 Dated: March 17, 2010. Alexa Posny, Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. 2010–6229 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Overview Information; Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Program In notice document 2010–5976 beginning on page 13106 in the issue of Thursday, March 18, 2010 make the following correction: On page 13106, in the second column, under the Applications Available: heading, in the first line, ‘‘April 2, 2010’’ should read ‘‘March 18, 2010’’. [FR Doc. C1–2010–5976 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505–01–D DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RM07–10–002] Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; Notice of the Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical Conference March 15, 2010. In a ‘‘Notice of Technical Conference’’ issued on February 22, 2010 in the above-referenced proceeding, the Commission stated that this conference, to be held on March 25, 2010, will address select issues identified by staff. Those issues include: (1) Inconsistencies in reporting upstream transactions in the natural gas supply chain on Form No. 552, and whether these transactions contribute to wholesale price formation; (2) whether transactions involving balancing, cashout, operational, and in-kind transactions should be reported on Form No. 552; and (3) whether the units of measurement (TBtu) currently used for reporting volumes in the form are appropriate. The Agenda for this Technical Conference is attached to this notice. Specific questions to each panel are on the attached Agenda. Each panelist will be given the opportunity to provide PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13523 a brief introductory statement on these questions. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. March 25, 2010: Commission Meeting Room 9 a.m.–9:10 a.m.—Opening Remarks. 9:10 a.m.–10:45 a.m.—Upstream transactions in the natural gas supply chain. 1. How has your company addressed the reporting of unprocessed gas on Form No. 552? 2. Are there unreported volumes of unprocessed physical natural gas (between the wellhead and any processing plant) that use, contribute to, or might they contribute to the formation of daily or monthly gas price indices? Are the volumes associated with these transactions material? 3. What effect, if any, will the development of nontraditional gas sources have on the reporting on unprocessed gas? 4. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate? Panelists • John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association). • William E. Shanahan, Marketing Manager, Chaparral LLC, (Natural Gas & Energy Association of Oklahoma). • Mary Nelson, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Devon Energy Corp. (Natural Gas Supply Association). • Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC. • Representative, Independent Producers Association of America. 10:45 a.m.–11 a.m.—Break 11 a.m. –12:15 p.m. Cashouts, Imbalances and Operational Volumes 1. How has your company addressed the reporting of cashouts, imbalance makeup and operational volumes on the Form No. 552 in relation to the total volumes of physical natural gas reported? 2. Are the volumes associated with these transactions material? Please quantify. 3. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate? Panelists • Scott Brewer, Director, North American Energy, Terra Industries, Inc. (Process Gas Consumers). • Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream LLC. E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1 13524 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 54 / Monday, March 22, 2010 / Notices • Matt Kerec, Assistant Commodity Manager, Alcoa, Inc. (Process Gas Consumers). • Michael E. Novak, Assistant General Manager, Federal Regulatory Affairs, National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. (on behalf of the American Gas Association). • John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association). • Dena Wiggins, Partner, Ballard Spahr LLP (Process Gas Consumers Group). 12:15 p.m.–1:15 p.m.—Lunch 1:15 p.m.–1:45 p.m.—Question and Answer Period 1:45 p.m.–2 p.m.—Closing Remarks [FR Doc. 2010–6163 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP10–82–000] Northern Natural Gas Company, Southern Natural Gas Company, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, Enterprise Field Services, LLC; Notice of Application pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES March 16, 2010. Take notice that on March 5, 2010, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern Natural), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124–1000, filed on behalf of itself and other owners, Southern Natural Gas Company, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, and Enterprise Field Services, LLC in the above referenced docket an application pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations, requesting authorization to abandon in place certain facilities, located onshore Texas and offshore Texas in state and federal waters, known as the Matagorda Offshore Pipeline System (MOPS). Northern Natural states that operation of MOPS has become uneconomical due to increasing costs of maintenance and repairs compared to falling revenues, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission’s Web site at https:// www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:41 Mar 19, 2010 Jkt 220001 Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TTY, (202) 502–8659. Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Michael T. Loeffler, Senior Director, Certificates and External Affairs, Northern Natural Gas Company, 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124, or phone at (402)398–7103, or e-mail at mike.loeffler@nngco.com. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: April 6, 2010. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–6232 Filed 3–19–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP10–76–000] Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application March 15, 2010. Take notice that on March 5, 2010, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company, (Eastern Shore), 1110 Forrest Avenue, Dover, Delaware 19904, pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), as amended, and Part 157 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) Regulations, filed in Docket No. CP10– 76–000, an application to construct and operate certain pipeline and ancillary facilities, with appurtenances, located in the State of Pennsylvania. Eastern Shore states that it proposes to: (1) Construct and operate approximately 8.3 miles of sixteen-inch mainline extension in the State of Pennsylvania, and (2) construct and operate a new interconnect receipt point. Eastern Shore states that such facilities are necessary to provide new firm transportation service to customers that have executed binding shipper nominations in conjunction with Eastern Shore’s recent Open Season (Mainline Extension Interconnect with Texas Eastern Transmission, LP, Project), which offered its customers the opportunity for new natural gas supplies and supply diversification by accessing the Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) pipeline system in southeastern Pennsylvania. Eastern Shore estimates the cost of the facilities will be $19,406,974, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is on file with E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM 22MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 54 (Monday, March 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13523-13524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6163]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM07-10-002]


Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; 
Notice of the Agenda for Form No. 552 Technical Conference

March 15, 2010.
    In a ``Notice of Technical Conference'' issued on February 22, 2010 
in the above-referenced proceeding, the Commission stated that this 
conference, to be held on March 25, 2010, will address select issues 
identified by staff. Those issues include: (1) Inconsistencies in 
reporting upstream transactions in the natural gas supply chain on Form 
No. 552, and whether these transactions contribute to wholesale price 
formation; (2) whether transactions involving balancing, cash-out, 
operational, and in-kind transactions should be reported on Form No. 
552; and (3) whether the units of measurement (TBtu) currently used for 
reporting volumes in the form are appropriate. The Agenda for this 
Technical Conference is attached to this notice.
    Specific questions to each panel are on the attached Agenda. Each 
panelist will be given the opportunity to provide a brief introductory 
statement on these questions.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.

March 25, 2010: Commission Meeting Room

9 a.m.-9:10 a.m.--Opening Remarks.
9:10 a.m.-10:45 a.m.--Upstream transactions in the natural gas supply 
chain.

    1. How has your company addressed the reporting of unprocessed gas 
on Form No. 552?
    2. Are there unreported volumes of unprocessed physical natural gas 
(between the wellhead and any processing plant) that use, contribute 
to, or might they contribute to the formation of daily or monthly gas 
price indices? Are the volumes associated with these transactions 
material?
    3. What effect, if any, will the development of nontraditional gas 
sources have on the reporting on unprocessed gas?
    4. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate 
measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate?

Panelists

     John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & 
Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association).
     William E. Shanahan, Marketing Manager, Chaparral LLC, 
(Natural Gas & Energy Association of Oklahoma).
     Mary Nelson, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, Devon Energy 
Corp. (Natural Gas Supply Association).
     Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream 
LLC.
     Representative, Independent Producers Association of 
America.

10:45 a.m.-11 a.m.--Break
11 a.m. -12:15 p.m. Cashouts, Imbalances and Operational Volumes

    1. How has your company addressed the reporting of cashouts, 
imbalance makeup and operational volumes on the Form No. 552 in 
relation to the total volumes of physical natural gas reported?
    2. Are the volumes associated with these transactions material? 
Please quantify.
    3. Is the current reporting measurement (TBtus) an appropriate 
measurement? Would reporting volumes in decatherms be more appropriate?

Panelists

     Scott Brewer, Director, North American Energy, Terra 
Industries, Inc. (Process Gas Consumers).
     Katie Rice, Director, Regulatory Affairs, DCP Midstream 
LLC.

[[Page 13524]]

     Matt Kerec, Assistant Commodity Manager, Alcoa, Inc. 
(Process Gas Consumers).
     Michael E. Novak, Assistant General Manager, Federal 
Regulatory Affairs, National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. (on behalf of 
the American Gas Association).
     John Poe, Manager, Regulatory Affairs, ExxonMobil Gas & 
Power Marketing Company (Natural Gas Supply Association).
     Dena Wiggins, Partner, Ballard Spahr LLP (Process Gas 
Consumers Group).

12:15 p.m.-1:15 p.m.--Lunch
1:15 p.m.-1:45 p.m.--Question and Answer Period
1:45 p.m.-2 p.m.--Closing Remarks

[FR Doc. 2010-6163 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.