Request for Public Comment on Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE) Proposed Policy as Amended on 2-19-10, 13265-13268 [2010-6006]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Notices
advice of the Board on the Naval
Service’s Postgraduate Education
Program and the collaborative exchange
and partnership between NPS and the
Air Force Institute of Technology
(AFIT). The board examines the
effectiveness with which the NPS is
accomplishing its mission. To this end,
the board will inquire into the curricula;
instruction; physical equipment;
administration; state of morale of the
student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal
affairs; and any other matters relating to
the operation of the NPS as the board
considers pertinent. Individuals without
a DoD government/CAC card require an
escort at the meeting location. For
access, information, or to send written
comments regarding the NPS BOA,
contact Ms. Jaye Panza, Naval
Postgraduate School, 1 University
Circle, Monterey, CA 93943–5001, or by
fax (831) 656–3145 by April 19, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–6033 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Board for Education Sciences
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Institute of Education Sciences,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the
schedule and proposed agenda of an
upcoming meeting of the National Board
for Education Sciences. The notice also
describes the functions of the
Committee. Notice of this meeting is
required by Section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act and is
intended to notify the public of their
opportunity to attend the open portion
of the meeting.
DATES: April 7 and 8, 2010.
TIME: April 7, 1 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.; April
8, 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: 80 F Street, NW., Room 100,
Washington, DC 20208.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norma Garza, Executive Director,
National Board for Education Sciences,
555 New Jersey Ave., NW., Room 602 K,
Washington, DC 20208; phone: (202)
219–2195; fax: (202) 219–1466; e-mail:
Norma.Garza@ed.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Board for Education Sciences
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
is authorized by Section 116 of the
Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002
(ESRA). The Board advises the Director
of the Institute of Education Sciences
(IES) on the establishment of activities
to be supported by the Institute, on the
funding for applications for grants,
contracts, and cooperative agreements
for research after the completion of peer
review, and reviews and evaluates the
work of the Institute. At this time, the
Board consists of six of fifteen
appointed members due to the
expirations of the terms of nine
members. The Board shall meet and can
carry out official business as provided
by the ESRA which states that a
majority of the voting members serving
at the time of a meeting constitutes a
quorum.
On April 7 from 1 p.m. to 1:15 p.m.,
the Board will approve the agenda and
hear remarks from the chair and the
executive director. From 1:15 p.m. to
2:15 p.m., IES director John Easton will
discuss priorities for the Institute,
followed by a Board discussion until 3
p.m. After a break ending at 3:15 p.m.,
the Board will conduct an overview of
the agencies represented by ex-officio
members. Presentations will follow from
4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. from U.S.
Department of Education officials. The
meeting will recess at 5:30 p.m.
On April 8, the meeting will begin at
8:30 a.m. with a review of the prior
day’s activity and a review of the
agenda. At 8:45 a.m. IES commissioners
and staff will give an update on the IES
Centers. This will conclude at 9:45 a.m.
Following a break until 10 a.m. the
Board will hear presentations on
recently released IES studies. There will
be an update on the What Works
Clearinghouse from 11:30 a.m. until
12:15 p.m., followed by an open
discussion and a consideration of next
steps. The meeting will adjourn at 12:30
p.m.
A final agenda will be available from
Norma Garza (see contact information
above) on March 29. Individuals who
will need accommodations for a
disability in order to attend the meeting
(e.g., interpreting services, assistance
listening devices, or materials in
alternative format) should notify Norma
Garza no later than March 29. We will
attempt to meet requests for
accommodations after this date but
cannot guarantee their availability. The
meeting site is accessible to individuals
with disabilities.
Records are kept of all Committee
proceedings and are available for public
inspection at 555 New Jersey Ave., NW.,
Room 602 K, Washington, DC 20208,
from the hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13265
Eastern Standard Time Monday through
Friday.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fed-register/.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free at 1–866–
512–1830; or in the Washington, DC,
area at (202) 512–0000.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
John Q. Easton,
Director, Institute of Education Sciences.
[FR Doc. 2010–6088 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Request for Public Comment on
Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE)
Proposed Policy as Amended on
2–19–10
AGENCY: United States Election
Assistance Commission.
ACTION: Notice: Request for Public
Comment.
SUMMARY: The EAC seeks public
comment on a Maintenance of
Expenditure (MOE) Proposed Policy as
Amended on 2–19–10. This advisory
would supersede Advisories 07–003 and
07–003A and fulfill the Election
Assistance Commission’s (EAC) ongoing
responsibility to provide information on
the management of Federal funds
provided under the Help America Vote
Act (HAVA). EAC issues this notice
according to a policy adopted on
September 18, 2008 that requires EAC to
provide notice and an opportunity for
public comment on, among other things,
advisories being considered for
adoption by the U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5 p.m. EST on April 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted: Via e-mail at
havacomments@eac.gov, and
Via mail addressed to the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission, 1201
New York Ave, NW., Suite 300,
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
13266
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Notices
Washington, DC 20005, or by fax at 202/
566–3127.
Commenters are encouraged to submit
comments electronically and include
‘‘MOE’’ in the subject line, to ensure
timely receipt and consideration. All
comments must be received by the EAC
by the date specified above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is the complete text of the
Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE)
Proposed Policy as Amended on 2–19–
10.
Notice: Request for Public Comment on
Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE)
Proposed Policy as Amended on
2–19–10
Policy Overview Statement
The Help America Vote Act of 2002
(HAVA) requires States to meet an
annual Maintenance of Expenditure
(MOE) (also known as Maintenance of
Effort) based on State expenditures for
activities allowable under Title III of
HAVA in the fiscal year prior to
November 2000. HAVA requires that
States establish a baseline spending
level and then meet that spending level
each year HAVA section 251 funds are
spent by the State. The following
questions and answers provide details
on what is required to meet HAVA’s
MOE requirement and how the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
will work with States to ensure they
have a realistic, auditable plan for
managing MOE requirements.
1. What Is the Purpose of the
Maintenance of Expenditures (MOE)
Requirement Mandated by HAVA?
The purpose of MOE is to ensure that
recipients of Section 251 funds
(requirements payments) use the
payments to meet the added
requirements placed on States by
HAVA, while maintaining the level of
non-Federal funding that was available
for those activities during the fiscal year
ending prior to November 2000.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
2. Where in HAVA Is the MOE
Requirement?
Section 254 of HAVA details what
must be in the State plan. An MOE
description is one of the pre-conditions
for receipt of a requirements payment
disbursement. Section 254(a)(7) requires
States to identify in their plans:
‘‘[H]ow the State, in using the
requirements payment, will maintain
the expenditures of the State for
activities funded by the payment at a
level that is not less than the level of
such expenditures maintained by the
State for the fiscal year ending prior to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
November 2000.’’ 42 U.S.C. 15404(a)(7)
(emphasis added).
3. What Does This MOE Policy Do?
The purpose of this policy is to
facilitate State compliance with the
maintenance of effort (MOE)
requirement in HAVA.
This policy supersedes EAC Advisory
drafts 07–003 and 07–003A. This policy
provides guidelines and assistance for
States to develop detailed, voluntary
plans for identifying a baseline MOE
level and maintaining that level in
subsequent years.
4. Who Is Covered by This Policy?
This policy applies directly to the 50
States, four U.S. Territories and the
District of Columbia (referred to as
States) that are eligible to receive
Requirements Payments. This policy
may also impact ‘‘lower tier’’ recipients
indirectly (see below). However, States
are ultimately responsible for
demonstrating compliance with MOE.
5. What Does the EAC Mean by the
Term ‘‘Lower Tier’’ Recipients?
A lower tier recipient is political
subdivision of a State. Depending on the
State, lower tier recipients may include,
but are not limited to, counties, cities,
townships, and other jurisdictions.
verification of information provided by
persons seeking to register to vote; and,
(6) improvement of the administration
of elections for Federal office should be
included in the baseline MOE.
For example, State X appropriates $10
million for election activities eligible for
funding under section 251 of HAVA. $2
million of the $10 million was
appropriated to county Y to provide
Federal provisional ballots on Election
Day. The State’s MOE is $10 million
because it includes all funds
appropriated to counties for that year as
part of its aggregate MOE.
8. When Would the EAC Like To Receive
the Voluntary State MOE Plans and
What Is the Process for Submission?
EAC would like to receive MOE plans
that can be submitted outside of the
State plan by December 1, 2010. Once
your plan is received, EAC’s grants
department will work with your State to
develop your MOE plan. EAC’s hope is
to have MOE plans developed by each
State that chooses to participate in the
process in place by January 31, 2011.
EAC will provide technical assistance,
including easy to use templates and
checklists for developing State MOE
plans, by early summer 2010.
6. Do States Need To Account for Lower
Tier (Local) Spending During the Base
Year in Calculating MOE?
MOE tracks State expenditures on a
prescribed set of Federal election
activities (see question 7), which
includes any funds appropriated by the
State to lower tier entities to support
those activities. Under this MOE policy,
States may exclude lower tier spending
from MOE when the funds used by the
lower tier entities are not derived from
a State appropriation or expenditure.
9. Does This Policy Include a Set of
Uniform Requirements That States Must
Comply With To Establish a Baseline
MOE and Meet Annual MOE
Requirements?
While this policy does call for a plan
with specific elements for establishing,
maintaining and reporting on MOE,
EAC recognizes that the financing and
administration of elections includes a
particularly diverse set of practices that
vary from State to State. As such, this
policy calls for development of Statederived, flexible plans designed to meet
each individual State’s circumstances.
7. What Types of Expenditures Must Be
Used To Calculate the MOE Baseline
Amount and Are Eligible To Count
Towards Our Annual MOE
Contribution?
States must use all election
expenditures that are allowable under
Section 251 of HAVA, and that were
funded directly by the State, or through
a State appropriation to a lower tier
entity in the base year, to calculate the
baseline MOE. All allowable uses under
Section 251 of HAVA, including: (1)
Purchase of voting equipment; (2)
development and operation of a
statewide voter registration list; (3)
development and implementation of
provisional voting for Federal elections;
(4) provision of information to voters at
the polling place on election day; (5)
10. Our State Plan Already
Acknowledges That We Will Meet the
MOE Requirements. Do We Still Need
To Submit the MOE Plan Discussed in
This Policy?
All States have acknowledged in their
State plans that they intend to meet
their MOE requirements. However,
these statements do not contain
information sufficient enough to guide
an audit of how the State is meeting its
MOE requirement. States adoption of
detailed MOE plans will help ensure
that States capture an accurate,
defensible baseline MOE and are
meeting annual MOE requirements. The
plans will set the basis for auditing
MOE and will help ensure that EAC
resolution of any State-specific audit
finding associated with MOE will be
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Notices
consistent with how that State has
proposed to meet its MOE requirement.
Submission of the MOE plan described
in this document is, however, voluntary
and may not be the only means of
satisfying section 254a(7) HAVA.
11. What Should a State Include in Its
MOE Plan?
A State’s MOE plan should:
1. Provide the date parameters for the
‘fiscal year ending prior to November
2000’ as described in HAVA. This base
year will be used to set the baseline
MOE for the State.
2. Provide the specific cost factors
that make up the baseline MOE, or
proposed alternative method(s) for
determining the baseline MOE.
3. Establish an MOE baseline dollar
level that is an aggregation of MOE from
all eligible jurisdictions.
4. Require collection of annual MOE
levels from all eligible jurisdictions and
outline a plan and timeline for
collecting this information.
5. Describe the back-up
documentation that States and eligible
lower tier jurisdictions must maintain
and make available for inspection by
EAC upon request in order to
substantiate the State’s MOE claim.
Documentation must include a tracking
sheet that shows MOE baseline and
annual MOE levels at the State and
eligible lower tier recipient levels.
6. Clearly state the roles and
responsibilities of both State and
eligible lower tier fund recipients for
reporting MOE and keeping appropriate
documentation to substantiate or
validate yearly MOE levels. Note that
both States and eligible lower tier
recipients should do an annual
certification of their MOE contribution.
12. What Is a Baseline MOE?
The baseline MOE is a dollar amount
that captures the level of State spending
for a particular program or activity in
the base year. In the case of HAVA, the
baseline is the State spending level for
a set of election’s activities (see question
11 below) that was in place in the fiscal
year ending prior to November 2000.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
13. What Dates Should a State Use To
Calculate MOE?
HAVA requires that States use the
fiscal year ending prior to November
2000 to determine the MOE baseline.
States may choose the Federal fiscal
year, which runs from October 1, 1999
through September 30, 2000; or the
State fiscal year, if it is different from
the Federal fiscal year.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
14. How Do We Know If Our State or
Lower Tier Recipient Have an MOE
Requirement in a Given Year?
Each State has an MOE obligation in
every fiscal year that it spends HAVA
Requirements Payments funds. Eligible
lower tier recipients may need to meet
MOE in any fiscal year in which they
receive Requirements Payments through
the State, dependent upon how the State
decides it wants to meet it’s annual
MOE contribution.
15. What Are the Reporting
Requirements Associated With MOE
Once a State Has an MOE Plan on File
With the EAC?
Pursuant to section 254(a)(12) and
section 258(3) of HAVA, each State is
required to submit as part of its annual
report a description and analysis of how
it has met or exceeded its baseline MOE
for the preceding fiscal year.
Appropriate back-up documentation, as
described in the State’s MOE plan, must
be kept on file and made available to
EAC staff during site visits or to auditors
or other officials during an audit or
investigation.
16. Should Our State Provide a Single,
Aggregate Baseline Amount for MOE, or
a Series of MOE Baseline Amounts for
Each Eligible Local Jurisdiction?
EAC’s requirement is that States
provide a single baseline and report an
annual aggregate MOE amount.
However, because States will have to
substantiate MOE levels, tracking MOE
for all eligible lower tier entities that are
required by the State to contribute to the
MOE is will probably be necessary.
17. Do States Have Any Flexibility in
How Much Is Spent Annually in Each of
the Cost Categories Identified by the
Plan, or Do They Have To Maintain
Expenditures in Each of the Categories?
A State’s MOE plan should track
expenditures by category to identify the
MOE baseline and annual contributions.
However, this policy does not require
States and eligible lower tier fund
recipients to maintain specific
expenditures within the identified cost
categories. This policy clarifies that only
the aggregate State MOE level needs to
be met on an annual basis.
In meeting the MOE baseline of
spending, it is left to the State to
determine how that baseline is met, as
an aggregate. For example, a State spent
HAVA 251 funds in 2008. In that fiscal
year, that State may have chosen to
expend more of its State funds on its
voter registration database and less of its
State funds on providing information to
voters at the polls than it did in the
fiscal year ending prior to November
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13267
2000. As long as the total baseline MOE
is met by adding up all the categories,
as an aggregate, individual spending for
a single category does not have to equal
the exact amount spent on that category
in the fiscal year ending prior to
November 2000.
18. What Happens If Our State Fails To
Meet Its MOE?
Any audit findings related to a State
not meeting its MOE requirements will
be dealt with through EAC’s Audit
Resolution Process. All current and
future audits and compliance site visits
that review MOE will be guided by the
State’s MOE plan, from the point plan
is accepted by the EAC forward.
19. How Can States Establish the
Baseline MOE for Lower Tier Recipients
Where Those Jurisdictions Lack the
Records or Detailed Accounting Needed
To Determine the Level of Spending on
Elections in the Base Year?
States may propose an alternative
measure for estimating spending in the
base year, but only after demonstrating
that accurate records are not attainable.
Some alternative measures might
include budgeted or appropriated
amounts, contract amounts, or similar
means compiled from available records
from the base year. States might also
estimate spending based on average
increases over time, but must provide
adequate justification and
documentation to support the estimate.
20. Do These States Have To Collect
MOE Information Every Year From
Eligible Lower Tier Recipients?
Each State has the ability to determine
how it wants to meet its MOE
obligation. Once the baseline is
established by the State, by identifying
all expenditures with State funds in the
base year that would have been
allowable costs under HAVA, the State
will need to determine how it would
like to meet that MOE obligation on an
annual basis. If lower tier entities are
enlisted by the State to help meet MOE
(similar to how some counties
contribute to State match obligations for
Requirement Payments) those enlisted
entities will have to keep appropriate
documentation to substantiate their
MOE contributions. EAC will provide
templates that allow for quick recording
and roll-up of this information to the
State level.
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
13268
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Notices
21. How Should States Address Capital
Expenditures in the Base Year? For
Example, Several Counties Purchased
Equipment in the Base Year, Which
Appears To Establish an Unreasonable
MOE Baseline for Those Jurisdictions
For purposes of establishing the
baseline MOE, HAVA does not make a
distinction between capital
expenditures and recurring costs
associated with election administration
that were incurred in the base year.
However, when calculating MOE
baselines, capital expenditures may be
expensed in a manner consistent with
IRS depreciation tables, over the
expected life of the equipment
purchased.
22. How Do States Establish a Baseline
MOE When the Year Before FY 2000
Was Not an Election Year and the
Election Administration Costs in That
Year Were Lower Than in an Election
Year?
HAVA is clear that the timeframe for
setting the baseline MOE is the year
before November 2000.
23. Does the EAC Have Any Suggestions
for How To Enforce MOE Requirements
With Eligible Lower Tier Fund
Recipients?
States should have several
mechanisms available to ensure
compliance with MOE requirements.
Sub-grant agreements should be
modified to contain MOE requirements
and instructions. Any agreements to buy
and transfer equipment or services to
lower tier jurisdictions should also
contain such a requirement. Finally,
States, as the legal recipient of HAVA
funds, have authority to enforce MOE
requirements through administrative
action which could include withholding
future requirement payments.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
24. Can You Provide an Example of
Another Federal Agency That Requires
Tracking of MOE at This Detailed Level?
State and local education agencies are
required to go through a similar process
to meet their MOE requirements for
Federal funding from the U.S.
Department of Education.
25. What Type of Assistance and
Training Can the States Expect From the
EAC To Help Implement This Policy?
EAC grants staff will be available to
provide guidance to States on their MOE
plans. In addition, EAC plans to provide
technical assistance to develop tools
and templates to help capture and track
MOE. EAC will also publish sample
MOE plans from States willing to share
their work with others as a best
practices guideline.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:14 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
26. What Authority in HAVA Allows
EAC To Implement This Proposed
Policy?
Section 254(a)(7) of HAVA requires
States to include in their State plan an
explanation of how they will meet their
MOE obligations. Submitting a State
plan and all of its required sections is
a precondition for receiving a
requirement payment. Section 258(3)
requires States to submit a yearly report
that includes an analysis and
description of the activities funded with
Section 251 funds, as well as how
activities conform to the State Plan
under Section 254. This policy defines
MOE and provides States with a
voluntary set of guidelines and practices
for developing a baseline MOE and
tracking yearly progress towards
meeting that obligation. Section 202(4)
of HAVA requires that EAC provide
information and training on the
management of payments and grants
provided through HAVA.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–6006 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
Protection, P.O. Box 1178, Richland,
Washington, 99352, 888–829–6347. The
Draft EIS is also available at DOE’s
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Web site at https://
www.gc.energy.gov/nepa.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on the Draft EIS,
contact Ms. Burandt at the address
above or by telephone at 1–888–785–
2865. For further information on DOE’s
NEPA process, contact Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, Office of
General Counsel, U.S. Department of
Energy, Washington, DC 20585–0103,
Telephone: (202) 586–4600, or leave a
message at (800) 472–2756. Further
information on the Draft EIS is also
available through the Hanford Web site
at: https://www.hanford.gov/orp.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15,
2010.
William M. Levitan,
Director, Office of Environmental
Compliance, Office of Environmental
Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–6046 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Extension of the Public Comment
Period for the Draft Tank Closure and
Waste Management Environmental
Impact Statement for the Hanford Site,
Richland, WA
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Extension of the public
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is extending the public
comment period for the Draft Tank
Closure and Waste Management
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Hanford Site, Richland, Washington
(Draft EIS, DOE/EIS–00391), made
available for public comment on
October 30, 2009 (74 FR 56194). The
public comment period for the Draft EIS
was to complete on March 19, 2010, and
will be extended for 45 days. The new
date for the close of the Public Comment
period is now May 3, 2010. The
extension is being made at the request
of several reviewers.
ADDRESSES: The Draft EIS is available
electronically through, and written
comments can be submitted at,
TC&WMEIS@saic.com, or by faxing to
(888) 785–2865. Paper copies may be
obtained by request to the EIS Web site
or by contacting: Mary Beth Burandt,
Document Manager, Office of River
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge
Reservation
Department of Energy.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge
Reservation. The Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92–463, 86
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of
this meeting be announced in the
Federal Register.
DATES: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 6
p.m.
ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center,
475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia J. Halsey, Federal Coordinator,
Department of Energy Oak Ridge
Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM–
90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865)
576–4025; Fax (865) 576–2347 or e-mail:
halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web
site at https://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/
ssab.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Board: The purpose of
the Board is to make recommendations
to DOE–EM and site management in the
areas of environmental restoration,
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 53 (Friday, March 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13265-13268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-6006]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Request for Public Comment on Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE)
Proposed Policy as Amended on 2-19-10
AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.
ACTION: Notice: Request for Public Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EAC seeks public comment on a Maintenance of Expenditure
(MOE) Proposed Policy as Amended on 2-19-10. This advisory would
supersede Advisories 07-003 and 07-003A and fulfill the Election
Assistance Commission's (EAC) ongoing responsibility to provide
information on the management of Federal funds provided under the Help
America Vote Act (HAVA). EAC issues this notice according to a policy
adopted on September 18, 2008 that requires EAC to provide notice and
an opportunity for public comment on, among other things, advisories
being considered for adoption by the U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
DATES: Comments must be received by 5 p.m. EST on April 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted: Via e-mail at
havacomments@eac.gov, and
Via mail addressed to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1201
New York Ave, NW., Suite 300,
[[Page 13266]]
Washington, DC 20005, or by fax at 202/566-3127.
Commenters are encouraged to submit comments electronically and
include ``MOE'' in the subject line, to ensure timely receipt and
consideration. All comments must be received by the EAC by the date
specified above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is the complete text of the
Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE) Proposed Policy as Amended on 2-19-10.
Notice: Request for Public Comment on Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE)
Proposed Policy as Amended on 2-19-10
Policy Overview Statement
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) requires States to meet an
annual Maintenance of Expenditure (MOE) (also known as Maintenance of
Effort) based on State expenditures for activities allowable under
Title III of HAVA in the fiscal year prior to November 2000. HAVA
requires that States establish a baseline spending level and then meet
that spending level each year HAVA section 251 funds are spent by the
State. The following questions and answers provide details on what is
required to meet HAVA's MOE requirement and how the U.S. Election
Assistance Commission (EAC) will work with States to ensure they have a
realistic, auditable plan for managing MOE requirements.
1. What Is the Purpose of the Maintenance of Expenditures (MOE)
Requirement Mandated by HAVA?
The purpose of MOE is to ensure that recipients of Section 251
funds (requirements payments) use the payments to meet the added
requirements placed on States by HAVA, while maintaining the level of
non-Federal funding that was available for those activities during the
fiscal year ending prior to November 2000.
2. Where in HAVA Is the MOE Requirement?
Section 254 of HAVA details what must be in the State plan. An MOE
description is one of the pre-conditions for receipt of a requirements
payment disbursement. Section 254(a)(7) requires States to identify in
their plans:
``[H]ow the State, in using the requirements payment, will maintain
the expenditures of the State for activities funded by the payment at a
level that is not less than the level of such expenditures maintained
by the State for the fiscal year ending prior to November 2000.'' 42
U.S.C. 15404(a)(7) (emphasis added).
3. What Does This MOE Policy Do?
The purpose of this policy is to facilitate State compliance with
the maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement in HAVA.
This policy supersedes EAC Advisory drafts 07-003 and 07-003A. This
policy provides guidelines and assistance for States to develop
detailed, voluntary plans for identifying a baseline MOE level and
maintaining that level in subsequent years.
4. Who Is Covered by This Policy?
This policy applies directly to the 50 States, four U.S.
Territories and the District of Columbia (referred to as States) that
are eligible to receive Requirements Payments. This policy may also
impact ``lower tier'' recipients indirectly (see below). However,
States are ultimately responsible for demonstrating compliance with
MOE.
5. What Does the EAC Mean by the Term ``Lower Tier'' Recipients?
A lower tier recipient is political subdivision of a State.
Depending on the State, lower tier recipients may include, but are not
limited to, counties, cities, townships, and other jurisdictions.
6. Do States Need To Account for Lower Tier (Local) Spending During the
Base Year in Calculating MOE?
MOE tracks State expenditures on a prescribed set of Federal
election activities (see question 7), which includes any funds
appropriated by the State to lower tier entities to support those
activities. Under this MOE policy, States may exclude lower tier
spending from MOE when the funds used by the lower tier entities are
not derived from a State appropriation or expenditure.
7. What Types of Expenditures Must Be Used To Calculate the MOE
Baseline Amount and Are Eligible To Count Towards Our Annual MOE
Contribution?
States must use all election expenditures that are allowable under
Section 251 of HAVA, and that were funded directly by the State, or
through a State appropriation to a lower tier entity in the base year,
to calculate the baseline MOE. All allowable uses under Section 251 of
HAVA, including: (1) Purchase of voting equipment; (2) development and
operation of a statewide voter registration list; (3) development and
implementation of provisional voting for Federal elections; (4)
provision of information to voters at the polling place on election
day; (5) verification of information provided by persons seeking to
register to vote; and, (6) improvement of the administration of
elections for Federal office should be included in the baseline MOE.
For example, State X appropriates $10 million for election
activities eligible for funding under section 251 of HAVA. $2 million
of the $10 million was appropriated to county Y to provide Federal
provisional ballots on Election Day. The State's MOE is $10 million
because it includes all funds appropriated to counties for that year as
part of its aggregate MOE.
8. When Would the EAC Like To Receive the Voluntary State MOE Plans and
What Is the Process for Submission?
EAC would like to receive MOE plans that can be submitted outside
of the State plan by December 1, 2010. Once your plan is received,
EAC's grants department will work with your State to develop your MOE
plan. EAC's hope is to have MOE plans developed by each State that
chooses to participate in the process in place by January 31, 2011. EAC
will provide technical assistance, including easy to use templates and
checklists for developing State MOE plans, by early summer 2010.
9. Does This Policy Include a Set of Uniform Requirements That States
Must Comply With To Establish a Baseline MOE and Meet Annual MOE
Requirements?
While this policy does call for a plan with specific elements for
establishing, maintaining and reporting on MOE, EAC recognizes that the
financing and administration of elections includes a particularly
diverse set of practices that vary from State to State. As such, this
policy calls for development of State-derived, flexible plans designed
to meet each individual State's circumstances.
10. Our State Plan Already Acknowledges That We Will Meet the MOE
Requirements. Do We Still Need To Submit the MOE Plan Discussed in This
Policy?
All States have acknowledged in their State plans that they intend
to meet their MOE requirements. However, these statements do not
contain information sufficient enough to guide an audit of how the
State is meeting its MOE requirement. States adoption of detailed MOE
plans will help ensure that States capture an accurate, defensible
baseline MOE and are meeting annual MOE requirements. The plans will
set the basis for auditing MOE and will help ensure that EAC resolution
of any State-specific audit finding associated with MOE will be
[[Page 13267]]
consistent with how that State has proposed to meet its MOE
requirement. Submission of the MOE plan described in this document is,
however, voluntary and may not be the only means of satisfying section
254a(7) HAVA.
11. What Should a State Include in Its MOE Plan?
A State's MOE plan should:
1. Provide the date parameters for the `fiscal year ending prior to
November 2000' as described in HAVA. This base year will be used to set
the baseline MOE for the State.
2. Provide the specific cost factors that make up the baseline MOE,
or proposed alternative method(s) for determining the baseline MOE.
3. Establish an MOE baseline dollar level that is an aggregation of
MOE from all eligible jurisdictions.
4. Require collection of annual MOE levels from all eligible
jurisdictions and outline a plan and timeline for collecting this
information.
5. Describe the back-up documentation that States and eligible
lower tier jurisdictions must maintain and make available for
inspection by EAC upon request in order to substantiate the State's MOE
claim. Documentation must include a tracking sheet that shows MOE
baseline and annual MOE levels at the State and eligible lower tier
recipient levels.
6. Clearly state the roles and responsibilities of both State and
eligible lower tier fund recipients for reporting MOE and keeping
appropriate documentation to substantiate or validate yearly MOE
levels. Note that both States and eligible lower tier recipients should
do an annual certification of their MOE contribution.
12. What Is a Baseline MOE?
The baseline MOE is a dollar amount that captures the level of
State spending for a particular program or activity in the base year.
In the case of HAVA, the baseline is the State spending level for a set
of election's activities (see question 11 below) that was in place in
the fiscal year ending prior to November 2000.
13. What Dates Should a State Use To Calculate MOE?
HAVA requires that States use the fiscal year ending prior to
November 2000 to determine the MOE baseline. States may choose the
Federal fiscal year, which runs from October 1, 1999 through September
30, 2000; or the State fiscal year, if it is different from the Federal
fiscal year.
14. How Do We Know If Our State or Lower Tier Recipient Have an MOE
Requirement in a Given Year?
Each State has an MOE obligation in every fiscal year that it
spends HAVA Requirements Payments funds. Eligible lower tier recipients
may need to meet MOE in any fiscal year in which they receive
Requirements Payments through the State, dependent upon how the State
decides it wants to meet it's annual MOE contribution.
15. What Are the Reporting Requirements Associated With MOE Once a
State Has an MOE Plan on File With the EAC?
Pursuant to section 254(a)(12) and section 258(3) of HAVA, each
State is required to submit as part of its annual report a description
and analysis of how it has met or exceeded its baseline MOE for the
preceding fiscal year. Appropriate back-up documentation, as described
in the State's MOE plan, must be kept on file and made available to EAC
staff during site visits or to auditors or other officials during an
audit or investigation.
16. Should Our State Provide a Single, Aggregate Baseline Amount for
MOE, or a Series of MOE Baseline Amounts for Each Eligible Local
Jurisdiction?
EAC's requirement is that States provide a single baseline and
report an annual aggregate MOE amount. However, because States will
have to substantiate MOE levels, tracking MOE for all eligible lower
tier entities that are required by the State to contribute to the MOE
is will probably be necessary.
17. Do States Have Any Flexibility in How Much Is Spent Annually in
Each of the Cost Categories Identified by the Plan, or Do They Have To
Maintain Expenditures in Each of the Categories?
A State's MOE plan should track expenditures by category to
identify the MOE baseline and annual contributions. However, this
policy does not require States and eligible lower tier fund recipients
to maintain specific expenditures within the identified cost
categories. This policy clarifies that only the aggregate State MOE
level needs to be met on an annual basis.
In meeting the MOE baseline of spending, it is left to the State to
determine how that baseline is met, as an aggregate. For example, a
State spent HAVA 251 funds in 2008. In that fiscal year, that State may
have chosen to expend more of its State funds on its voter registration
database and less of its State funds on providing information to voters
at the polls than it did in the fiscal year ending prior to November
2000. As long as the total baseline MOE is met by adding up all the
categories, as an aggregate, individual spending for a single category
does not have to equal the exact amount spent on that category in the
fiscal year ending prior to November 2000.
18. What Happens If Our State Fails To Meet Its MOE?
Any audit findings related to a State not meeting its MOE
requirements will be dealt with through EAC's Audit Resolution Process.
All current and future audits and compliance site visits that review
MOE will be guided by the State's MOE plan, from the point plan is
accepted by the EAC forward.
19. How Can States Establish the Baseline MOE for Lower Tier Recipients
Where Those Jurisdictions Lack the Records or Detailed Accounting
Needed To Determine the Level of Spending on Elections in the Base
Year?
States may propose an alternative measure for estimating spending
in the base year, but only after demonstrating that accurate records
are not attainable. Some alternative measures might include budgeted or
appropriated amounts, contract amounts, or similar means compiled from
available records from the base year. States might also estimate
spending based on average increases over time, but must provide
adequate justification and documentation to support the estimate.
20. Do These States Have To Collect MOE Information Every Year From
Eligible Lower Tier Recipients?
Each State has the ability to determine how it wants to meet its
MOE obligation. Once the baseline is established by the State, by
identifying all expenditures with State funds in the base year that
would have been allowable costs under HAVA, the State will need to
determine how it would like to meet that MOE obligation on an annual
basis. If lower tier entities are enlisted by the State to help meet
MOE (similar to how some counties contribute to State match obligations
for Requirement Payments) those enlisted entities will have to keep
appropriate documentation to substantiate their MOE contributions. EAC
will provide templates that allow for quick recording and roll-up of
this information to the State level.
[[Page 13268]]
21. How Should States Address Capital Expenditures in the Base Year?
For Example, Several Counties Purchased Equipment in the Base Year,
Which Appears To Establish an Unreasonable MOE Baseline for Those
Jurisdictions
For purposes of establishing the baseline MOE, HAVA does not make a
distinction between capital expenditures and recurring costs associated
with election administration that were incurred in the base year.
However, when calculating MOE baselines, capital expenditures may be
expensed in a manner consistent with IRS depreciation tables, over the
expected life of the equipment purchased.
22. How Do States Establish a Baseline MOE When the Year Before FY 2000
Was Not an Election Year and the Election Administration Costs in That
Year Were Lower Than in an Election Year?
HAVA is clear that the timeframe for setting the baseline MOE is
the year before November 2000.
23. Does the EAC Have Any Suggestions for How To Enforce MOE
Requirements With Eligible Lower Tier Fund Recipients?
States should have several mechanisms available to ensure
compliance with MOE requirements. Sub-grant agreements should be
modified to contain MOE requirements and instructions. Any agreements
to buy and transfer equipment or services to lower tier jurisdictions
should also contain such a requirement. Finally, States, as the legal
recipient of HAVA funds, have authority to enforce MOE requirements
through administrative action which could include withholding future
requirement payments.
24. Can You Provide an Example of Another Federal Agency That Requires
Tracking of MOE at This Detailed Level?
State and local education agencies are required to go through a
similar process to meet their MOE requirements for Federal funding from
the U.S. Department of Education.
25. What Type of Assistance and Training Can the States Expect From the
EAC To Help Implement This Policy?
EAC grants staff will be available to provide guidance to States on
their MOE plans. In addition, EAC plans to provide technical assistance
to develop tools and templates to help capture and track MOE. EAC will
also publish sample MOE plans from States willing to share their work
with others as a best practices guideline.
26. What Authority in HAVA Allows EAC To Implement This Proposed
Policy?
Section 254(a)(7) of HAVA requires States to include in their State
plan an explanation of how they will meet their MOE obligations.
Submitting a State plan and all of its required sections is a
precondition for receiving a requirement payment. Section 258(3)
requires States to submit a yearly report that includes an analysis and
description of the activities funded with Section 251 funds, as well as
how activities conform to the State Plan under Section 254. This policy
defines MOE and provides States with a voluntary set of guidelines and
practices for developing a baseline MOE and tracking yearly progress
towards meeting that obligation. Section 202(4) of HAVA requires that
EAC provide information and training on the management of payments and
grants provided through HAVA.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-6006 Filed 3-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P