Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2009-035, Extend Use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain Commercial Items, 13413-13414 [2010-5985]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
conducted as other than full and open
competition.
Item V—Trade Agreements—Costa
Rica, Oman, and Peru (FAR Case 2008–
036)
The Councils have adopted as final,
without change, an interim rule
published in the Federal Register at 74
FR 28426 on June 15, 2009, amending
the FAR to implement the Dominican
Republic—Central America—United
States Free Trade Agreement with
respect to Costa Rica, the United StatesOman Free Trade Agreement, and the
United States-Peru Trade Promotion
Agreement.
This final rule allows contracting
officers to purchase the goods and
services of Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru
without application of the Buy
American Act if the acquisition is
subject to the applicable trade
agreements.
Item VI—Payments Under Fixed-Price
Architect-Engineer Contracts (FAR Case
2008–015)
This rule amends FAR 52.232–10,
Payments under Fixed-Price ArchitectEngineer Contracts, to revise and clarify
the retainage requirements. The
contracting officer can withhold up to
10 percent of the payment due in any
billing period when the contracting
officer determines that such a
withholding is necessary to protect the
Government’s interest and ensure
satisfactory completion of the contract.
However, withholding the entire 10
percent is not required, and no
withholding is required if the
contractor’s performance has been
satisfactory. The changes clarify that
retainage is optional and any amounts
retained should not be held over beyond
the satisfactory completion of the
instant contract.
Item VII—Technical Amendment
An editorial change has been made at
FAR 14.202–4(a)(3).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
Federal Acquisition Circular
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005-39 is issued under the authority of
the Secretary of Defense, the
Administrator of General Services, and
the Administrator for the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Unless otherwise specified, all
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
and other directive material contained
in FAC 2005-39 is effective March 19,
2010, except for Items III, IV, and VI,
which are effective April 19, 2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:19 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Linda W. Neilson,
Deputy Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy (Defense Acquisition
Regulations System).
Dated: March 11, 2010.
Rodney P. Lantier,
Acting Senior Procurement Executive, Office
of Acquisition Policy, U.S. General Services
Administration.
Dated: March 8, 2010.
William P. McNally,
Assistant Administrator for Procurement,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–5984 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
13413
A. Background
This final rule amends the FAR to
revise section 13.500(d) to implement
section 816 of the NDAA for FY 2010.
Section 816 of the NDAA for FY 2010
strikes out ‘‘2010’’ in subsection (e) of
section 4202 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of
1996 (Division D of Pub. L. 104–106, 10
U.S.C. 2304 note) as amended by section
822 of the NDAA for FY 2008 (Pub. L.
110—181) and inserts ‘‘2012.’’ FAR
subpart 13.5 authorizes as a test
program, the use of simplified
procedures for the acquisition of certain
commercial items in amounts greater
than the simplified acquisition
threshold, but not exceeding $5.5
million, ($11 million for acquisitions
described in FAR 13.500(e)) including
options, if the contracting officer can
reasonably expect that offers will
include commercial items. FAR subpart
13.500(d) authorizes the contracting
officer to issue solicitations under this
subpart until January 1, 2010. This final
rule extends this authority to January 1,
2012.
48 CFR Part 13
B. Decision to Issue a Final Rule
[FAC 2005–39; FAR Case 2009–035; Item
I; Docket 2010–0080, Sequence 1]
This case implements section 816 of
the NDAA for FY 2010. It merely
extends the end date of the Commercial
Item Test Program from January 1, 2010,
to January 1, 2012. Therefore, because
there is no change in policy or
procedure, the Councils determined to
issue a final rule without comment.
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, was not subject to
review under Section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
RIN 9000–AL52
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR
Case 2009–035, Extend Use of
Simplified Acquisition Procedures for
Certain Commercial Items
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) have agreed on a final rule
amending the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to revise subpart 13.5,
‘‘Test Program for Certain Commercial
Items,’’ to implement section 816 of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–84). The rule extends the
program for two more years. The
program was to expire January 1, 2010.
DATES: Effective Date: March 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 208–4949. For
information pertaining to status or
publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–39, FAR
case 2009–035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule. This final rule
does not constitute a significant FAR
revision within the meaning of FAR
1.501 and Pub. L. 98–577, and
publication for public comments is not
required.
The Councils will consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in parts affected by
this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (FAC 2005–39, FAR Case
2009–035) in correspondence.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FAR do not impose information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
E:\FR\FM\19MRR2.SGM
19MRR2
13414
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. chapter 35,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 13
Government procurement.
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR part 13 as set forth
below:
■
PART 13—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 13 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
13.500
[Amended]
2. Amend section 13.500 by removing
from paragraph (d) ‘‘January 1, 2010’’
and adding ‘‘January 1, 2012’’ in its
place.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–5985 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 15
[FAC 2005–39; FAR Case 2008–012; Item
II; Docket 2008–0001, Sequence 23]
RIN 9000–AL12
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR
Case 2008–012, Clarification of
Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on
Non-Commercial Modifications of
Commercial Items
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) have adopted as final, with
minor changes, an interim rule which
amended the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to implement section
814 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2008. Section 814 required
the harmonization of the thresholds for
cost or pricing data. Specifically, section
814 required alignment of the threshold
for cost or pricing data on noncommercial modifications of
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:19 Mar 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
commercial items with the Truth In
Negotiation Act (TINA) threshold for
cost or pricing data.
DATES: Effective Date: March 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 501–3221 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the FAR Secretariat
at (202) 501–4755. Please cite FAC
2005–39, FAR case 2008–012.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
estimated total value of orders for the
specified period at the time of contract
award, as well as the individual value
of any subsequent discrete orders, to
which the TINA thresholds apply.
Consequently, the final rule language
reflects only minor editorial changes.
This is a significant regulatory action
and therefore, was subject to review
under Section 6(b) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
A. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
74 FR 11826 on March 19, 2009, to
implement section 814 of the NDAA for
FY 2008. Section 814 implemented two
areas of clarification with regards to the
submission of cost or pricing data on
non-commercial modifications of
commercial items.
The comment period closed on May
18, 2009, with one comment received.
The respondent opined that the addition
of the new FAR text ‘‘at the time of
contract award’’ was unclear. The
respondent indicated that a contract’s
initial price subsequently changes based
upon modifications and inquired if the
total price ‘‘at time of contract award’’
included subsequent modifications that
changed the initial contract price. The
respondent also highlighted the
example of an indefinite deliveryindefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract
where orders are issued and inquired
whether ‘‘at the time of contract award’’
related to issuance of the IDIQ contract
or individual orders placed under this
IDIQ contract. The respondent also
offered examples of possible revised
language.
The Councils believe that, with minor
changes, the language in the interim
rule is appropriate. Section 814 of the
NDAA for FY 2008 required the
insertion of the language ‘‘at time of
contract award’’ after the language ‘‘total
price of contract’’, which is already
contained in FAR 15.403–1. This
language is being added to clarify at
what point during the life of the
contract that the cost or pricing
threshold should be applied under FAR
15.403–1. The Councils believe that the
language ‘‘at the time of contract award’’
clearly indicates that subsequent
modifications, other than those which
meet the triggering thresholds of TINA
themselves, that change a contract’s
price are not factored into determining
when the cost or pricing threshold
should be applied under FAR 15.403–1.
In the case of IDIQ contracts, it is
commonly understood that it is the
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The Department of Defense, the
General Services Administration, and
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration certify that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
since it is harmonizing FAR 15.403–1
with other parts of the FAR and should
actually reduce the administrative
burden on contractors by not requiring
them to track two separate dollar
thresholds for submitting cost or pricing
data. It is also increasing this dollar
threshold relative to the submittal of
cost or pricing data in this situation and
thus contractors will experience a
reduced administrative burden since
they no longer will be required to
submit cost or pricing data on this lower
threshold amount.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FAR do not impose information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. chapter 35,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 15
Government procurement.
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
Accordingly, the interim rule
published in the Federal Register at 74
FR 11826 on March 19, 2009, is adopted
as a final rule with the following
changes:
■
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 15 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
2. Amend section 15.403–1 by
revising paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(B) and
(c)(3)(iii)(C) to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\19MRR2.SGM
19MRR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 53 (Friday, March 19, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13413-13414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 13
[FAC 2005-39; FAR Case 2009-035; Item I; Docket 2010-0080, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AL52
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2009-035, Extend Use of
Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain Commercial Items
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) have agreed on a final rule
amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to revise subpart
13.5, ``Test Program for Certain Commercial Items,'' to implement
section 816 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84). The rule extends the program for two
more years. The program was to expire January 1, 2010.
DATES: Effective Date: March 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact
Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 208-4949. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-39, FAR
case 2009-035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This final rule amends the FAR to revise section 13.500(d) to
implement section 816 of the NDAA for FY 2010. Section 816 of the NDAA
for FY 2010 strikes out ``2010'' in subsection (e) of section 4202 of
the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (Division D of Pub. L. 104-106, 10 U.S.C.
2304 note) as amended by section 822 of the NDAA for FY 2008 (Pub. L.
110--181) and inserts ``2012.'' FAR subpart 13.5 authorizes as a test
program, the use of simplified procedures for the acquisition of
certain commercial items in amounts greater than the simplified
acquisition threshold, but not exceeding $5.5 million, ($11 million for
acquisitions described in FAR 13.500(e)) including options, if the
contracting officer can reasonably expect that offers will include
commercial items. FAR subpart 13.500(d) authorizes the contracting
officer to issue solicitations under this subpart until January 1,
2010. This final rule extends this authority to January 1, 2012.
B. Decision to Issue a Final Rule
This case implements section 816 of the NDAA for FY 2010. It merely
extends the end date of the Commercial Item Test Program from January
1, 2010, to January 1, 2012. Therefore, because there is no change in
policy or procedure, the Councils determined to issue a final rule
without comment.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule. This
final rule does not constitute a significant FAR revision within the
meaning of FAR 1.501 and Pub. L. 98-577, and publication for public
comments is not required.
The Councils will consider comments from small entities concerning
the existing regulations in parts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAC 2005-39, FAR Case 2009-
035) in correspondence.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management
[[Page 13414]]
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 13
Government procurement.
Dated: March 15, 2010.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
0
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 13 as set forth below:
PART 13--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 13 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
13.500 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 13.500 by removing from paragraph (d) ``January 1,
2010'' and adding ``January 1, 2012'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2010-5985 Filed 3-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S