Florida Power and Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4; Exemption, 13142-13144 [2010-5927]
Download as PDF
13142
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 52 / Thursday, March 18, 2010 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–250 and 50–251; NRC–
2010–0025]
Florida Power and Light Company;
Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4; Exemption
1.0
Background
Florida Power and Light Company
(FPL, the licensee), is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–31
and DPR–41, which authorize operation
of the Turkey Point, Unit Nos. 3 and 4
(Turkey Point 3 and 4). The license
provides, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect. The facility consists of two
pressurized-water reactors located in
Florida City, Florida.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
2.0
Request
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, Appendix
G requires that fracture toughness
requirements for ferritic materials of
pressure-retaining components of the
reactor coolant pressure boundary of
light water nuclear power reactors need
to provide adequate margins of safety
during any condition of normal
operation, including anticipated
operational occurrences and system
hydrostatic tests, to which the pressure
boundary may be subjected over its
service lifetime; and 10 CFR 50.61
provides fracture toughness
requirements for protection against
pressurized thermal shock (PTS) events.
By letter dated March 18, 2009,
(Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML090920408), FPL
proposed exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, to revise
certain Turkey Point 3 and 4, reactor
pressure vessel (RPV) initial
(unirradiated) properties using
Framatome Advanced Nuclear Power
Topical Report (TR) BAW–2308,
Revisions 1A and 2A, ‘‘Initial RTNDT of
Linde 80 Weld Materials.’’ This
exemption addresses only those parts of
the regulations (i.e., 10 CFR 50.61 and
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G) which
discuss the definition or use of
unirradiated nil-ductility reference
temperature, RTNDT(U), and its
associated uncertainty, sD. All other
requirements of 10 CFR 50.61 and 10
CFR part 50, Appendix G are unchanged
by this exemption.
The licensee requested an exemption
from Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:08 Mar 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
replace the required use of the existing
Charpy V-notch and drop weight-based
methodology and allow the use of an
alternate methodology to incorporate
the use of fracture toughness test data
for evaluating the integrity of the Turkey
Point 3 and 4 RPV circumferential
beltline welds based on the use of the
1997 and 2002 Editions of American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) Standard Test Method E 1921,
‘‘Standard Test Method for
Determination of Reference
Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in
the Transition Range,’’ and American
Society for Mechanical Engineering
(ASME), Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code (Code), Code Case N–629, ‘‘Use of
Fracture Toughness Test Data to
establish Reference Temperature for
Pressure Retaining Materials of Section
III, Division 1, Class 1.’’ The exemption
is required since Appendix G to 10 CFR
part 50, through reference to Appendix
G to Section XI of the ASME Code
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(a), requires
the use of a methodology based on
Charpy V-notch and drop-weight data.
The licensee also requested an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.61 to use an
alternate methodology to allow the use
of fracture toughness test data for
evaluating the integrity of the Turkey
Point 3 and 4 RPV circumferential
beltline welds based on the use of the
1997 and 2002 Editions of ASTM E 1921
and ASME Code Case N–629. The
exemption is required since the
methodology for evaluating RPV
material fracture toughness in 10 CFR
50.61 requires the use of the Charpy Vnotch and drop-weight data for
establishing the PTS reference
temperature (RTPTS).
On February 3, 2010, a new rule, 10
CFR 50.61a, ‘‘Alternate Fracture
Toughness Requirements for Protection
Against PTS Events,’’ became effective.
The NRC staff reviewed this new rule
against Turkey Point’s exemption
request and determined that there is no
effect on the exemption request. The
new rule does not modify the
requirements from which the licensee
has sought an exemption, and the
alternative provided by the new rule
does not address the scope of issues
associated with both 10 CFR 50.61 and
10 CFR part 50, Appendix G that the
requested exemption does.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1)
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are
present. The licensee requested an
exemption from the use of the Charpy
V-notch and drop-weight-based
methodology required by 10 CFR part
50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61. This
exemption only modifies the
methodology to be used by the licensee
for demonstrating compliance with the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, and does
not exempt the licensee from meeting
any other requirement of 10 CFR part
50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61.
Authorized by Law
These exemptions would allow the
licensee to use an alternate methodology
to make use of fracture toughness test
data for evaluating the integrity of the
Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPV
circumferential beltline welds, and
would not result in changes to operation
of the plant. Section 50.60(b) of 10 CFR
Part 50 allows the use of alternatives to
10 CFR part 50, Appendix G, or portions
thereof, when an exemption is granted
by the Commission under 10 CFR 50.12.
In addition, Section 50.60(b) of 10 CFR
part 50 permits different NRC-approved
methods for use in determining the
initial material properties. As stated
above, 10 CFR 50.12(a) allows the NRC
to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61. The
NRC staff has determined that granting
of the licensee’s proposed exemptions
will not result in a violation of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
or the Commission’s regulations.
Therefore, the exemptions are
authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and
Safety
The underlying purpose of Appendix
G to 10 CFR part 50 is to set forth
fracture toughness requirements for
ferritic materials of pressure-retaining
components of the reactor coolant
pressure boundary of light water nuclear
power reactors to provide adequate
margins of safety during any condition
of normal operation, including
anticipated operational occurrences and
system hydrostatic tests, to which the
pressure boundary may be subjected
over its service lifetime. The
methodology underlying the
requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR
part 50 is based on the use of Charpy Vnotch and drop-weight data. The
licensee proposes to replace the use of
the existing Charpy V-notch and dropweight-based methodology by a fracture
toughness-based methodology to
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 52 / Thursday, March 18, 2010 / Notices
demonstrate compliance with Appendix
G to 10 CFR part 50.
The NRC staff has concluded that the
exemptions are justified based on the
licensee utilizing the fracture toughness
methodology specified in BAW–2308,
Revisions 1A and 2A, within the
conditions and limitations delineated in
the NRC staff’s safety evaluations (SEs),
dated August 4, 2005 (ADAMS
Accession Number ML052070408) and
March 24, 2008 (ML080770349). The
use of the methodology specified in the
NRC staff’s SEs will ensure that pressure
and temperature limits developed for
the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPVs will
continue to be based on an adequately
conservative estimate of RPV material
properties and ensure that the pressureretaining components of the reactor
coolant pressure boundary retain
adequate margins of safety during any
condition of normal operation,
including anticipated operational
occurrences. This exemption only
modifies the methodology to be used by
the licensee for demonstrating
compliance with the requirements of
Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, and does
not exempt the licensee from meeting
any other requirement of Appendix G to
10 CFR part 50.
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.61 is to establish requirements that
ensure a licensee’s RPV will be
protected from failure during a PTS
event by evaluating the fracture
toughness of RPV materials. The
licensee seeks an exemption from 10
CFR 50.61 to use a methodology for the
determination of adjusted/indexing
reference temperatures. The licensee
proposes to use ASME Code Case N–629
and the methodology outlined in its
submittal, which are based on the use of
fracture toughness data, as an
alternative to the Charpy V-notch and
drop-weight-based methodology
required by 10 CFR 50.61 for
establishing the initial, unirradiated
properties when calculating RTPTS
values. The NRC staff has concluded
that the exemption is justified based on
the licensee utilizing the methodology
specified in the NRC staff’s SEs
regarding TR BAW–2308, Revisions 1A
and 2A, dated August 4, 2005, and
March 24, 2008. This TR established an
alternative method for determining
initial (unirradiated) material reference
temperatures for RPV welds
manufactured using Linde 80 weld flux
(i.e., ‘‘Linde 80 welds’’) and established
weld wire heat-specific and Linde 80
weld generic values of this reference
temperature. These weld wire heatspecific and Linde 80 weld generic
values may be used in lieu of the nilductility reference temperature (RTNDT)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:08 Mar 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
parameter, the determination of which
is specified by paragraph NB–2331 of
Section III of the ASME Code.
Regulations associated with the
determination of RPV material
properties involving protection of the
RPV from brittle failure or ductile
rupture include Appendix G to 10 CFR
Part 50 and 10 CFR 50.61, the PTS rule.
These regulations require that the initial
(unirradiated) material reference
temperature, IRTNDT, be determined in
accordance with the provisions of the
ASME Code, and provide the process for
determination of RTPTS, the reference
temperature RTNDT, evaluated for the
end of license fluence.
In TR BAW–2308, Revision 1, the
Babcock and Wilcox Owners Group
(B&WOG) proposed to perform fracture
toughness testing based on the
application of the ‘‘Master Curve’’
evaluation procedure, which permits
data obtained from sample sets tested at
different temperatures to be combined,
as the basis for redefining the initial
(unirradiated) material properties of
Linde 80 welds. NRC staff evaluated this
methodology for determining Linde 80
weld initial (unirradiated) material
properties and uncertainty in those
properties, as well as the overall method
for combining unirradiated material
property measurements based on To
values (i.e., IRTTo), property shifts from
models in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.99,
Revision 2, which are based on Charpy
V-notch testing and a defined margin
term to account for uncertainties in the
NRC staff SE. Table 3 in the SE contains
the NRC staff-accepted IRTTo and initial
margin (denoted as si) for specific Linde
80 weld wire heat numbers. In
accordance with the conditions and
limitations outlined in the NRC staff SE
on TR BAW–2308, Revision 1, for
utilizing the values in Table 3: the
licensee has utilized the appropriate
NRC staff-accepted IRTTo and si values
for Linde 80 weld wire heat numbers;
applied a chemistry factor of 167 °F (the
weld wire heat-specific chemical
composition, via the methodology of RG
1.99, Revision 2, did not indicate that a
higher chemistry factor should apply);
applied a value of 28 °F for sD in the
margin term; and submitted values for
DRTNDT and the margin term for each
Linde 80 weld in the RPV through the
end of the current operating license.
Additionally, the NRC’s SE for TR
BAW–2308, Revision 2 concludes that
the revised RTPTS values for Linde 80
weld materials are acceptable for
referencing in plant specific licensing
applications as delineated in TR BAW–
2308, Revision 2 and to the extent
specified under Section 4.0, Limitations
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13143
and Conditions, of the SE, which states:
‘‘Future plant-specific applications for
RPVs containing weld heat 72105, and
weld heat 299L44, of Linde 80 welds
must use the revised IRTTo and si,
values in TR BAW–2308, Revision 2.’’
Therefore, all conditions and limitations
outlined in the NRC staff SEs on TR
BAW–2308, Revisions 1A and 2A, have
been met for Turkey Point 3 and 4.
The use of the methodology in TR
BAW–2308, Revisions 1A and 2A will
ensure the PTS evaluation developed for
the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPVs will
continue to be based on an adequately
conservative estimate of RPV material
properties and ensure the RPVs will be
protected from failure during a PTS
event.
Based on the above, no new accident
precursors are created by allowing an
exemption to use an alternate
methodology to comply with the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.61 in
determining adjusted/indexing
reference temperatures, thus, the
probability of postulated accidents is
not increased. Also, based on the above,
the consequences of postulated
accidents are not increased. Therefore,
there is no undue risk to public health
and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and
Security
The proposed exemption would allow
the licensee to use an alternate
methodology to allow the use of fracture
toughness test data for evaluating the
integrity of the Turkey Point 3 and 4
RPV circumferential beltline welds.
This change to Turkey Point 3 and 4 has
no relation to security issues. Therefore,
the common defense and security is not
impacted by these exemptions.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present
whenever application of the regulation
in the particular circumstances is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G
and 10 CFR 50.61 is to protect the
integrity of the reactor coolant pressure
boundary by ensuring that each reactor
vessel material has adequate fracture
toughness. Therefore, since the
underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61 is
achieved by an alternative methodology
for evaluating RPV material fracture
toughness, the special circumstances
required by 10 CFR 50(a)(2)(ii) for the
granting of an exemption from portions
of the requirements of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61 exist.
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
13144
4.0
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 52 / Thursday, March 18, 2010 / Notices
Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemptions are authorized
by law, will not endanger life or
property or common defense and
security, and is, otherwise, in the public
interest. Therefore, the Commission
hereby grants the Florida Power and
Light Company exemptions from
portions of the requirements of
Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 and 10
CFR 50.61, to allow an alternative
methodology that is based on using of
fracture toughness test data to determine
initial, unirradiated properties for
evaluating the integrity of the Turkey
Point RPV circumferential beltline
welds. This exemption addresses only
those parts of the regulations (i.e., 10
CFR 50.61 and 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G) which discuss the
definition or use of unirradiated nilductility reference temperature,
RTNDT(U), and its associated uncertainty,
sD. All other requirements of 10 CFR
50.61 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G
are unchanged by this exemption.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 4426)
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–5927 Filed 3–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/08/2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
03/08/2010, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of governmental nature may file
disaster loan applications at the address
listed above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Calaveras, Imperial,
Los Angeles, Riverside, San
Bernardino, Siskiyou
The Interest Rates are:
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Non-Profit Organizations With
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
3.625
3.000
3.000
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 12072B and for
economic injury is 12073B.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #12072 and #12073]
[FR Doc. 2010–5882 Filed 3–17–10; 8:45 am]
California Disaster #CA–00151
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of California (FEMA–1884–
DR), dated 03/08/2010.
Incident: Severe Winter Storms,
Flooding, and Debris and Mud Flows.
Incident Period: 01/17/2010 through
02/06/2010.
Effective Date: 03/08/2010.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 05/07/2010.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:08 Mar 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[Disaster Declaration #12079 and #12080]
South Dakota Disaster #SD–00028
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Percent
For Physical Damage:
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere .....
Non-Profit Organizations without
Credit Available Elsewhere .....
For Economic Injury:
Non-Profit Organizations without
Credit Available Elsewhere .....
3.625
3.000
3.000
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 12079B and for
economic injury is 12080B.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of South Dakota (FEMA–1887–
DR), dated 03/10/2010.
PO 00000
Incident: Severe Winter Storm.
Incident Period: 01/20/2010 through
01/26/2010.
Effective Date: 03/10/2010.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 05/10/2010.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/10/2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
03/10/2010, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of governmental nature may file
disaster loan applications at the address
listed above or other locally announced
locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Aurora, Brule,
Buffalo, Campbell, Corson, Day,
Deuel, Dewey, Douglas, Edmunds,
Faulk, Grant, Gregory, Hand, Harding,
Hughes, Hutchinson, Hyde, Jerauld,
Mccook, Mcpherson, Meade, Perkins,
Potter, Roberts, Sully, Turner,
Walworth, Ziebach. And those
portions of the Cheyenne River Indian
Reservation, Sisseton-Wahpeton
Indian Reservation, and Standing
Rock Indian Reservation that lie
within these counties.
The Interest Rates are:
Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–5885 Filed 3–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 52 (Thursday, March 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13142-13144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5927]
[[Page 13142]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-2010-0025]
Florida Power and Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4;
Exemption
1.0 Background
Florida Power and Light Company (FPL, the licensee), is the holder
of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and DPR-41, which authorize
operation of the Turkey Point, Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey Point 3 and
4). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of two pressurized-water reactors located in
Florida City, Florida.
2.0 Request
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50,
Appendix G requires that fracture toughness requirements for ferritic
materials of pressure-retaining components of the reactor coolant
pressure boundary of light water nuclear power reactors need to provide
adequate margins of safety during any condition of normal operation,
including anticipated operational occurrences and system hydrostatic
tests, to which the pressure boundary may be subjected over its service
lifetime; and 10 CFR 50.61 provides fracture toughness requirements for
protection against pressurized thermal shock (PTS) events. By letter
dated March 18, 2009, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML090920408), FPL proposed exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, to
revise certain Turkey Point 3 and 4, reactor pressure vessel (RPV)
initial (unirradiated) properties using Framatome Advanced Nuclear
Power Topical Report (TR) BAW-2308, Revisions 1A and 2A, ``Initial
RTNDT of Linde 80 Weld Materials.'' This exemption addresses
only those parts of the regulations (i.e., 10 CFR 50.61 and 10 CFR Part
50, Appendix G) which discuss the definition or use of unirradiated
nil-ductility reference temperature, RTNDT(U), and its
associated uncertainty, [sigma][Delta]. All other
requirements of 10 CFR 50.61 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G are
unchanged by this exemption.
The licensee requested an exemption from Appendix G to 10 CFR part
50 to replace the required use of the existing Charpy V-notch and drop
weight-based methodology and allow the use of an alternate methodology
to incorporate the use of fracture toughness test data for evaluating
the integrity of the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPV circumferential beltline
welds based on the use of the 1997 and 2002 Editions of American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Method E 1921,
``Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature,
T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range,'' and
American Society for Mechanical Engineering (ASME), Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code (Code), Code Case N-629, ``Use of Fracture Toughness Test
Data to establish Reference Temperature for Pressure Retaining
Materials of Section III, Division 1, Class 1.'' The exemption is
required since Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50, through reference to
Appendix G to Section XI of the ASME Code pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(a),
requires the use of a methodology based on Charpy V-notch and drop-
weight data. The licensee also requested an exemption from 10 CFR 50.61
to use an alternate methodology to allow the use of fracture toughness
test data for evaluating the integrity of the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPV
circumferential beltline welds based on the use of the 1997 and 2002
Editions of ASTM E 1921 and ASME Code Case N-629. The exemption is
required since the methodology for evaluating RPV material fracture
toughness in 10 CFR 50.61 requires the use of the Charpy V-notch and
drop-weight data for establishing the PTS reference temperature
(RTPTS).
On February 3, 2010, a new rule, 10 CFR 50.61a, ``Alternate
Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events,''
became effective. The NRC staff reviewed this new rule against Turkey
Point's exemption request and determined that there is no effect on the
exemption request. The new rule does not modify the requirements from
which the licensee has sought an exemption, and the alternative
provided by the new rule does not address the scope of issues
associated with both 10 CFR 50.61 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G that
the requested exemption does.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the Commission may, upon application
by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. The licensee requested an
exemption from the use of the Charpy V-notch and drop-weight-based
methodology required by 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61.
This exemption only modifies the methodology to be used by the licensee
for demonstrating compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61, and does not exempt the licensee from
meeting any other requirement of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR
50.61.
Authorized by Law
These exemptions would allow the licensee to use an alternate
methodology to make use of fracture toughness test data for evaluating
the integrity of the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPV circumferential beltline
welds, and would not result in changes to operation of the plant.
Section 50.60(b) of 10 CFR Part 50 allows the use of alternatives to 10
CFR part 50, Appendix G, or portions thereof, when an exemption is
granted by the Commission under 10 CFR 50.12. In addition, Section
50.60(b) of 10 CFR part 50 permits different NRC-approved methods for
use in determining the initial material properties. As stated above, 10
CFR 50.12(a) allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the licensee's proposed exemptions will not
result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or
the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the exemptions are authorized
by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The underlying purpose of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 is to set
forth fracture toughness requirements for ferritic materials of
pressure-retaining components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary
of light water nuclear power reactors to provide adequate margins of
safety during any condition of normal operation, including anticipated
operational occurrences and system hydrostatic tests, to which the
pressure boundary may be subjected over its service lifetime. The
methodology underlying the requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50
is based on the use of Charpy V-notch and drop-weight data. The
licensee proposes to replace the use of the existing Charpy V-notch and
drop-weight-based methodology by a fracture toughness-based methodology
to
[[Page 13143]]
demonstrate compliance with Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50.
The NRC staff has concluded that the exemptions are justified based
on the licensee utilizing the fracture toughness methodology specified
in BAW-2308, Revisions 1A and 2A, within the conditions and limitations
delineated in the NRC staff's safety evaluations (SEs), dated August 4,
2005 (ADAMS Accession Number ML052070408) and March 24, 2008
(ML080770349). The use of the methodology specified in the NRC staff's
SEs will ensure that pressure and temperature limits developed for the
Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPVs will continue to be based on an adequately
conservative estimate of RPV material properties and ensure that the
pressure-retaining components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary
retain adequate margins of safety during any condition of normal
operation, including anticipated operational occurrences. This
exemption only modifies the methodology to be used by the licensee for
demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR
part 50, and does not exempt the licensee from meeting any other
requirement of Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50.
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.61 is to establish requirements
that ensure a licensee's RPV will be protected from failure during a
PTS event by evaluating the fracture toughness of RPV materials. The
licensee seeks an exemption from 10 CFR 50.61 to use a methodology for
the determination of adjusted/indexing reference temperatures. The
licensee proposes to use ASME Code Case N-629 and the methodology
outlined in its submittal, which are based on the use of fracture
toughness data, as an alternative to the Charpy V-notch and drop-
weight-based methodology required by 10 CFR 50.61 for establishing the
initial, unirradiated properties when calculating RTPTS
values. The NRC staff has concluded that the exemption is justified
based on the licensee utilizing the methodology specified in the NRC
staff's SEs regarding TR BAW-2308, Revisions 1A and 2A, dated August 4,
2005, and March 24, 2008. This TR established an alternative method for
determining initial (unirradiated) material reference temperatures for
RPV welds manufactured using Linde 80 weld flux (i.e., ``Linde 80
welds'') and established weld wire heat-specific and Linde 80 weld
generic values of this reference temperature. These weld wire heat-
specific and Linde 80 weld generic values may be used in lieu of the
nil-ductility reference temperature (RTNDT) parameter, the
determination of which is specified by paragraph NB-2331 of Section III
of the ASME Code. Regulations associated with the determination of RPV
material properties involving protection of the RPV from brittle
failure or ductile rupture include Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50 and 10
CFR 50.61, the PTS rule. These regulations require that the initial
(unirradiated) material reference temperature, IRTNDT, be
determined in accordance with the provisions of the ASME Code, and
provide the process for determination of RTPTS, the
reference temperature RTNDT, evaluated for the end of
license fluence.
In TR BAW-2308, Revision 1, the Babcock and Wilcox Owners Group
(B&WOG) proposed to perform fracture toughness testing based on the
application of the ``Master Curve'' evaluation procedure, which permits
data obtained from sample sets tested at different temperatures to be
combined, as the basis for redefining the initial (unirradiated)
material properties of Linde 80 welds. NRC staff evaluated this
methodology for determining Linde 80 weld initial (unirradiated)
material properties and uncertainty in those properties, as well as the
overall method for combining unirradiated material property
measurements based on To values (i.e., IRTTo),
property shifts from models in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.99, Revision 2,
which are based on Charpy V-notch testing and a defined margin term to
account for uncertainties in the NRC staff SE. Table 3 in the SE
contains the NRC staff-accepted IRTTo and initial margin
(denoted as [sigma]i) for specific Linde 80 weld wire heat
numbers. In accordance with the conditions and limitations outlined in
the NRC staff SE on TR BAW-2308, Revision 1, for utilizing the values
in Table 3: the licensee has utilized the appropriate NRC staff-
accepted IRTTo and [sigma]i values for Linde 80
weld wire heat numbers; applied a chemistry factor of 167 [deg]F (the
weld wire heat-specific chemical composition, via the methodology of RG
1.99, Revision 2, did not indicate that a higher chemistry factor
should apply); applied a value of 28 [deg]F for
[sigma][Delta] in the margin term; and submitted values for
[Delta]RTNDT and the margin term for each Linde 80 weld in
the RPV through the end of the current operating license. Additionally,
the NRC's SE for TR BAW-2308, Revision 2 concludes that the revised
RTPTS values for Linde 80 weld materials are acceptable for
referencing in plant specific licensing applications as delineated in
TR BAW-2308, Revision 2 and to the extent specified under Section 4.0,
Limitations and Conditions, of the SE, which states: ``Future plant-
specific applications for RPVs containing weld heat 72105, and weld
heat 299L44, of Linde 80 welds must use the revised IRTTo
and [sigma]i, values in TR BAW-2308, Revision 2.''
Therefore, all conditions and limitations outlined in the NRC staff SEs
on TR BAW-2308, Revisions 1A and 2A, have been met for Turkey Point 3
and 4.
The use of the methodology in TR BAW-2308, Revisions 1A and 2A will
ensure the PTS evaluation developed for the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPVs
will continue to be based on an adequately conservative estimate of RPV
material properties and ensure the RPVs will be protected from failure
during a PTS event.
Based on the above, no new accident precursors are created by
allowing an exemption to use an alternate methodology to comply with
the requirements of 10 CFR 50.61 in determining adjusted/indexing
reference temperatures, thus, the probability of postulated accidents
is not increased. Also, based on the above, the consequences of
postulated accidents are not increased. Therefore, there is no undue
risk to public health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and Security
The proposed exemption would allow the licensee to use an alternate
methodology to allow the use of fracture toughness test data for
evaluating the integrity of the Turkey Point 3 and 4 RPV
circumferential beltline welds. This change to Turkey Point 3 and 4 has
no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and
security is not impacted by these exemptions.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii),
are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the
rule. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR
50.61 is to protect the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure
boundary by ensuring that each reactor vessel material has adequate
fracture toughness. Therefore, since the underlying purpose of 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix G and 10 CFR 50.61 is achieved by an alternative
methodology for evaluating RPV material fracture toughness, the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR 50(a)(2)(ii) for the granting of an
exemption from portions of the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
G and 10 CFR 50.61 exist.
[[Page 13144]]
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemptions are authorized by law, will not endanger life
or property or common defense and security, and is, otherwise, in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the Florida
Power and Light Company exemptions from portions of the requirements of
Appendix G to 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR 50.61, to allow an alternative
methodology that is based on using of fracture toughness test data to
determine initial, unirradiated properties for evaluating the integrity
of the Turkey Point RPV circumferential beltline welds. This exemption
addresses only those parts of the regulations (i.e., 10 CFR 50.61 and
10 CFR part 50, Appendix G) which discuss the definition or use of
unirradiated nil-ductility reference temperature, RTNDT(U),
and its associated uncertainty, [sigma][Delta]. All other
requirements of 10 CFR 50.61 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix G are
unchanged by this exemption.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment (75 FR 4426)
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-5927 Filed 3-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P