Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6, 12804-12805 [2010-5794]
Download as PDF
12804
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Notices
having unsupervised contact with
children (or other vulnerable
population) would ideally have been
submitted to the FBI and approved
pursuant to Public Law 92–544.
However, in the absence of such
approved state statute, the FBI Compact
Officer may determine that the National
Child Protection Act (NCPA)/Volunteers
for Children Act (VCA) may be used as
authorization to access FBI-maintained
criminal history record information
during emergencies and disasters.
Authorized federal or state officials
must ensure, within reason, that a
system is maintained to track the namebased criminal history record checks of
the III system and the required followup fingerprint submissions during the
emergency period and to ensure namebased check results are disseminated
solely to government officials to be used
for official purposes.
Dated: February 23, 2010.
Liane M. Moriyama,
Compact Council Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010–5708 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces its intent
to hold proposal review meetings
throughout the year. The purpose of
these meetings is to provide advice and
recommendations concerning proposals
submitted to the NSF for financial
support. The agenda for each of these
meetings is to review and evaluate
proposals as part of the selection
process for awards. The review and
evaluation may also include assessment
of the progress of awarded proposals.
The majority of these meetings will take
place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd.,
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
These meetings will be closed to the
public. The proposals being reviewed
include information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information; financial data, such as
salaries; and personal information
concerning individuals associated with
the proposals. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF
will continue to review the agenda and
merits of each meeting for overall
compliance of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act.
These closed proposal review
meetings will not be announced on an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
individual basis in the Federal Register.
NSF intends to publish a notice similar
to this on a quarterly basis. For an
advance listing of the closed proposal
review meetings that include the names
of the proposal review panel and the
time, date, place, and any information
on changes, corrections, or
cancellations, please visit the NSF Website: https://www.nsf.gov. This
information may also be requested by
telephoning, 703/292–8182.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–5779 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on EPR; Notice
of Meeting
The ACRS U.S. Evolutionary Power
Reactor (EPR) Subcommittee will hold a
meeting on April 6, 2010, at 11545
Rockville Pike, T2–B1, Rockville,
Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
a portion that may be closed to protect
information that is proprietary to
AREVA NP, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(4).
The proposed agenda for the subject
meeting shall be as follows:
Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 8:30 a.m.–5
p.m.
The Subcommittee will review
Chapters 11 and 16 of the Safety
Evaluation Report with Open Items
associated with the U.S. EPR Design
Certification Document Review. The
Subcommittee will gather information,
analyze relevant issues and facts, and
formulate proposed positions and
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation
by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Mr. Derek
Widmayer (Telephone 301–415–7366,
E-mail: Derek.Widmayer@nrc.gov) five
days prior to the meeting, if possible, so
that appropriate arrangements can be
made. Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be emailed to the DFO one day
before meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted. Detailed
procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 58268–58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the Web site cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in major
inconvenience.
Dated: March 12, 2010.
Antonio F. Dias,
Branch Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B,
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–5791 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2010–0103]
Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide
8.6, ‘‘Standard Test Procedure for
¨
Geiger-Muller Counters.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harriet Karagiannis, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–251–
7477 or e-mail
Harriet.Karagiannis@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is withdrawing
Regulatory Guide (RG) 8.6, ‘‘Standard
¨
Test Procedure for Geiger-Muller
Counters,’’ published in May 1973. The
¨
NRC issued RG 8.6, for Geiger-Muller
(GM) counters endorsing test procedures
specified in ANSI N42.3–1969, ‘‘Test
¨
Procedure for Geiger-Muller Counters.’’
ANSI N42.3–1969 has not been revised;
it is outdated and no longer useful.
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Notices
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
RG 8.6 provided guidance for
licensees to comply with Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
Part 20, ‘‘Standards for Protection
against Radiation,’’ specifically 10 CFR
20.201, ‘‘Precautionary Procedures:
Surveys’’ which required surveys,
including appropriate measurements of
levels of radiation. That provision, 10
CFR 20.201, was deleted, and that
subject matter is addressed in a new
section, 10 CFR 20.1501, ‘‘General,’’
which states that licensees shall perform
surveys to ensure that instruments and
equipment used for quantitative
radiation measurements (e.g., dose rate
and effluent monitoring) are calibrated
periodically for the radiation measured.
In the 1970s, the GM counters were
the main radiation detection
instruments used by licensees. At that
time, radiation protection programs
needed the guidance included in RG 8.6
because there was limited information
available on the use and maintenance of
these counters. However, since the
1970s, technology has changed
radically, and currently, in addition to
GM counters, there are many types of
radiation detection and measurement
instruments used. Most of them are
fairly complex to operate, maintain, and
calibrate.
Generally, the NRC does not provide
specific guidance for the technical
testing or calibration of radiation
detection and measurement equipment.
Any such guidance would soon become
outdated, since the development of
these instruments is continuously
advancing, producing new models
tailored to a range of specialized
clientele. The manufacturers provide
instructions and training for testing and
calibration of each new instrument.
Also, since the 1970s, the industry has
gained extensive experience in the
characteristics of the GM counters and
other instruments. In addition,
organizations such as the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
and other private groups offer
calibration services to those who lack
in-house training and experience in
testing and calibrating instruments.
II. Further Information
The withdrawal of RG 8.6 does not
alter any prior or existing licensing
commitments or conditions based on its
use. The guidance provided in RG 8.6 is
neither necessary nor current.
Regulatory guides may be withdrawn
when their guidance is superseded by
congressional action or no longer
provides useful information.
Regulatory guides are available for
inspection or downloading through the
NRC’s public Web site under
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ in the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections. Regulatory guides are also
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR), Room
O–1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–
2738. The PDR’s mailing address is US
NRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555–0001.
The PDR staff can be reached by
telephone at 301–415–4737 or 800–397–
4209, by fax at 301–415–3548, and by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day
of March, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrea D. Valentin,
Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch,
Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–5794 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2010–26; Order No. 420]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
include a new contract within the
existing Global Expedited Package
Services 2 (GEPS 2) product. The Postal
Service characterizes the referenced
contract as a successor to a current
contract, which will terminate early due
to fulfillment of a volume condition.
This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with this filing.
DATES: Comments are due: March 19,
2010.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 or
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12805
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On March 10, 2010, the Postal Service
filed a notice announcing that it has
entered into an additional Global
Expedited Package Services 2 (GEPS 2)
contract.1 The Postal Service believes
the instant contract is functionally
equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS 2 contracts, and is supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice also explains
that Order No. 86, which established
GEPS 1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 1. In Order No. 290,
the Commission approved the GEPS 2
product.2
The instant contract. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that the
contract is in accordance with Order No.
86. The Postal Service submitted the
contract and supporting materials under
seal, a redacted copy of the contract as
Attachment 1, a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2) to the
Notice as Attachment 2, Governors’
Decision No. 08–7 and an application
for non-public treatment of materials as
Attachments 3 and 4, respectively. Id. at
1–2.
The Postal Service relates that the
instant contract is the immediate
successor contract to the contract in
Docket No. CP2009–59, which expires
on September 5, 2010, and which the
Commission found to be functionally
equivalent in Order No. 286.3 It states
that because the customer has met the
volume commitment of its present
contract, it requests approval for the
instant contract and the customer’s
current contract will be terminated
early. The term of the contract is one
year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 2 contract fits within the
1 Notice of United States Postal Service Filing of
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package
Services 2 Negotiated Service Agreement and
Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials
Filed Under Seal, March 10, 2010 (Notice).
2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
3 Docket No. CP2009–59, Order Concerning
Additional Global Expedited Package Services 1
Negotiated Service Agreement, August 24, 2009
(Order No. 286).
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12804-12805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5794]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2010-0103]
Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Withdrawal of Regulatory Guide 8.6, ``Standard Test Procedure
for Geiger-M[uuml]ller Counters.''
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harriet Karagiannis, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-251-
7477 or e-mail Harriet.Karagiannis@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is withdrawing
Regulatory Guide (RG) 8.6, ``Standard Test Procedure for Geiger-
M[uuml]ller Counters,'' published in May 1973. The NRC issued RG 8.6,
for Geiger-M[uuml]ller (GM) counters endorsing test procedures
specified in ANSI N42.3-1969, ``Test Procedure for Geiger-M[uuml]ller
Counters.'' ANSI N42.3-1969 has not been revised; it is outdated and no
longer useful.
[[Page 12805]]
RG 8.6 provided guidance for licensees to comply with Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 20, ``Standards for
Protection against Radiation,'' specifically 10 CFR 20.201,
``Precautionary Procedures: Surveys'' which required surveys, including
appropriate measurements of levels of radiation. That provision, 10 CFR
20.201, was deleted, and that subject matter is addressed in a new
section, 10 CFR 20.1501, ``General,'' which states that licensees shall
perform surveys to ensure that instruments and equipment used for
quantitative radiation measurements (e.g., dose rate and effluent
monitoring) are calibrated periodically for the radiation measured.
In the 1970s, the GM counters were the main radiation detection
instruments used by licensees. At that time, radiation protection
programs needed the guidance included in RG 8.6 because there was
limited information available on the use and maintenance of these
counters. However, since the 1970s, technology has changed radically,
and currently, in addition to GM counters, there are many types of
radiation detection and measurement instruments used. Most of them are
fairly complex to operate, maintain, and calibrate.
Generally, the NRC does not provide specific guidance for the
technical testing or calibration of radiation detection and measurement
equipment. Any such guidance would soon become outdated, since the
development of these instruments is continuously advancing, producing
new models tailored to a range of specialized clientele. The
manufacturers provide instructions and training for testing and
calibration of each new instrument. Also, since the 1970s, the industry
has gained extensive experience in the characteristics of the GM
counters and other instruments. In addition, organizations such as the
National Institute of Standards and Technology and other private groups
offer calibration services to those who lack in-house training and
experience in testing and calibrating instruments.
II. Further Information
The withdrawal of RG 8.6 does not alter any prior or existing
licensing commitments or conditions based on its use. The guidance
provided in RG 8.6 is neither necessary nor current. Regulatory guides
may be withdrawn when their guidance is superseded by congressional
action or no longer provides useful information.
Regulatory guides are available for inspection or downloading
through the NRC's public Web site under ``Regulatory Guides'' in the
NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections. Regulatory guides are also available for inspection at the
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), Room O-1 F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738. The PDR's mailing
address is US NRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The PDR staff can be
reached by telephone at 301-415-4737 or 800-397-4209, by fax at 301-
415-3548, and by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of March, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrea D. Valentin,
Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch, Division of Engineering,
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-5794 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P