Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures, 12720-12722 [2010-5737]
Download as PDF
12720
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(b) The regulation. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering the
waters in the restricted area for any
reason without prior written permission
from the Commanding Officer, Naval
Station Everett.
(2) Mooring, anchoring, fishing and/or
recreational boating are prohibited in
the restricted area without prior written
permission from the Commanding
Officer, Naval Station Everett.
(c) Enforcement. The regulation in
this section shall be enforced by the
Commanding Officer, Naval Station
Everett and such agencies and persons
as he/she shall designate.
Dated: March 10, 2010.
Michael G. Ensch,
Chief, Operations, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2010–5740 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 389
[Docket No. FMCSA–2009–0354]
RIN 2126–AB23
Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: FMCSA proposes to amend its
regulations by establishing direct final
rulemaking procedures for use on
noncontroversial rules. Under these
procedures, FMCSA would make
regulatory changes that would become
effective a specified number of days
after the date of publication in the
Federal Register, unless FMCSA
receives written adverse comment(s) or
written notice of intent to submit
adverse comment(s), received by the
date specified in the direct final rule.
These new procedures would expedite
the promulgation of routine or
noncontroversial rules by reducing the
time and resources necessary to
develop, review, clear, and publish
separate proposed and final rules.
FMCSA would not use the direct final
rule procedures for complex or
controversial issues.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before April 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Federal Docket
Management System Number in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods. Do not submit the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
same comments by more than one
method. However, to allow effective
public participation before the comment
period deadline, the Agency encourages
use of the Web site that is listed first.
It will provide the most efficient and
timely method of receiving and
processing your comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and docket
number for this regulatory action. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Refer to
the Privacy Act heading on https://
www.regulations.gov for further
information.
Public Participation: The
regulations.gov system is generally
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. You can find electronic
submission and retrieval help and
guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section of
the Web site. For notification that
FMCSA received the comments, please
include a self-addressed, stamped
envelope or postcard, or print the
acknowledgement page that appears
after submitting comments on line.
Copies or abstracts of all documents
referenced in this notice are in the
docket: FMCSA–2009–0354. For access
to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
or to Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. All
comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date
indicated above will be considered and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above address. Comments
received after the comment closing date
will be filed in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable. In
addition to late comments, FMCSA will
also continue to file relevant
information in the docket as it becomes
available after the comment period
closing date, and interested persons
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
should continue to examine the docket
for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Mr. Bivan R. Patnaik,
Chief, Regulatory Development
Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366–8092.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) specifically
provides that notice and comment
rulemaking procedures are not required
where the Agency determines that there
is good cause to dispense with them.
Generally, good cause exists where the
procedures are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). FMCSA
proposes to use direct final rulemaking
to streamline the rulemaking process
where the rule is noncontroversial and
the Agency does not expect adverse
comment.
Direct final rulemaking would be
more efficient in using FMCSA
resources by reducing the time and
resources necessary to develop, review,
clear, and publish separate proposed
and final rules for rules the Agency
expects to be noncontroversial and
unlikely to result in adverse public
comment. A number of Federal agencies
use this process, including various
Department of Transportation operating
administrations. For example, on
January 30, 2004, the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation (OST)
published a final rule adopting direct
final rule procedures (69 FR 4455) and
the Federal Railroad Administration
published a final rule adopting direct
final rule procedures on March 7, 2007
(72 FR 10086).
Direct Final Rule Procedures
FMCSA would determine whether a
particular rulemaking is
noncontroversial and unlikely to result
in adverse comments based on its
experience with similar rules that it
previously proposed and published
without receiving adverse comments.
Adverse comments are those comments
that are critical of the rule, suggest that
the rule should not be adopted, or
suggest a change to the rule. Comments
outside the scope of the rule and
comments suggesting that the rule’s
policy or requirements should or should
not be extended to other Agency
programs outside the scope of the rule
would not be considered adverse.
After making the determination that a
rule would be appropriate for direct
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
final rulemaking, FMCSA would
publish the rule as a direct final rule in
the Federal Register. The document
would state in the preamble that
FMCSA does not anticipate adverse
comments and that unless it receives
written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse
comments, the rule would become
effective a specified number of days
after the date it is published in the
Federal Register. If FMCSA receives
adverse comments, or receives notice of
intent to file adverse comments by the
date specified in the direct final rule, it
would publish a rule in the Federal
Register withdrawing the direct final
rule before it goes into effect. FMCSA
may then publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking with a new comment period
if the Agency decides to go forward with
the rulemaking.
If no adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse
comments are received by the date
specified in the direct final rule,
FMCSA would publish a rule in the
Federal Register stating that it did not
receive any adverse comments and
confirming the effective date of the rule.
Direct final rulemaking may be
appropriate for noncontroversial rules
that (1) Make non-substantive
clarifications or corrections to existing
rules; (2) incorporate by reference the
latest or otherwise updated versions of
technical or industry standards; (3)
affect internal procedures of FMCSA
such as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of
documents; (4) update existing forms;
(5) make minor changes to rules
regarding statistics and reporting
requirements, such as a change in
reporting period (for example, from
quarterly to annually) or eliminating a
type of data collection no longer
necessary. FMCSA may also use direct
final rulemaking for a particular rule if
similar rules had been previously
proposed and published without
adverse comment. Even if a rulemaking
falls into one of the above categories, if
adverse comments are anticipated,
FMCSA would not use the direct final
rule process. The additional time and
resources expended to withdraw the
rule and republish it for comment will
serve as an incentive for the Agency to
make careful determinations as to
whether this procedure is appropriate.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FMCSA has determined that this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 or
under the Department’s Regulatory
Policies and Procedures. There are no
costs associated with the proposed rule.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
There would be some cost savings in
Federal Register publication costs and
efficiencies for the public and FMCSA
personnel in eliminating duplicative
reviews. I certify that this rule would
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Finally, FMCSA believes there are no
Federalism implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rulemaking contains
no information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
FMCSA has determined that the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Act of 1995, do not apply to
this proposed rulemaking.
Environment
FMCSA considered the environmental
impacts of this proposed rulemaking
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, and determined it is
categorically excluded from further
environmental analysis under FMCSA
Order 5610.1 paragraph 6.x of Appendix
2. FMCSA Order 5610.1 was published
on March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680). A
Categorical Exclusion Determination is
available for inspection or copying in
the regulations.gov website listed under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 389
Rulemaking procedures.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, FMCSA proposes to amend
49 CFR part 389 as follows:
PART 389—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR
part 389 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 113, 501 et seq.,
subchapters I and III of chapter 311, chapter
313, and 31502; 42 U.S.C 4917; and 49 CFR
1.73.
2. Section 389.11 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 389.11
General.
Except as provided in § 389.39, Direct
final rulemaking procedures, unless the
Administrator, for good cause, finds a
rule is impractical, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest, and
incorporates such a finding and a brief
statement for the reason for it in the
rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking
must be issued, and interested persons
are invited to participate in the
rulemaking proceedings involving rules
under an Act.
3. Add new § 389.39 to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12721
§ 389.39 Direct final rulemaking
procedures
A direct final rule makes regulatory
changes and states that those changes
will take effect on a specified date
unless FMCSA receives an adverse
comment or notice of intent to file an
adverse comment by the s date specified
in the direct final rule published in the
Federal Register.
(a) Types of actions appropriate for
direct final rulemaking. Rules that the
Administrator determines to be noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse public comments may be
published in the final rule section of the
Federal Register as direct final rules.
These include non-controversial rules
that:
(1) Make non-substantive
clarifications or corrections to existing
rules;
(2) Incorporate by reference the latest
or otherwise updated versions of
technical or industry standards;
(3) Affect internal FMCSA procedures
such as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of
documents;
(4) Update existing forms;
(5) Make minor changes to rules
regarding statistics and reporting
requirements, such as a change in
reporting period (for example, from
quarterly to annually) or eliminating a
type of data collection no longer
necessary;
(b) Adverse Comment. An adverse
comment is a comment that FMCSA
judges to be critical of the rule, to
suggest that the rule should not be
adopted, or to suggest that a change
should be made to the rule. Under the
direct final rule process, FMCSA does
not consider the following types of
comments to be adverse:
(1) Comments recommending another
rule change, in addition to the change
in the direct final rule at issue, unless
the commenter states that the direct
final rule would be ineffective without
the change;
(2) Comments outside the scope of the
rule and comments suggesting that the
rule’s policy or requirements should or
should not be extended to other Agency
programs outside the scope of the rule;
(3) Comments in support of the rule;
or
(4) Comments requesting clarification.
(c) Confirmation of effective date.
FMCSA will publish a confirmation rule
document in the Federal Register, if it
has not received an adverse comment or
notice of intent to file an adverse
comment by the date specified in the
direct final rule. The confirmation rule
document tells the public the effective
date of the rule.
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
12722
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
(d) Withdrawal of a direct final rule.
(1) If FMCSA receives an adverse
comment or a notice of intent to file an
adverse comment within the comment
period, it will publish a rule document
in the Federal Register, before the
effective date of the direct final rule,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
advising the public and withdrawing
the direct final rule.
(2) If FMCSA withdraws a direct final
rule because of an adverse comment, the
Agency may issue a notice of proposed
rulemaking if it decides to pursue the
rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Issued on: March 10, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–5737 Filed 3–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 17, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12720-12722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5737]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 389
[Docket No. FMCSA-2009-0354]
RIN 2126-AB23
Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA proposes to amend its regulations by establishing direct
final rulemaking procedures for use on noncontroversial rules. Under
these procedures, FMCSA would make regulatory changes that would become
effective a specified number of days after the date of publication in
the Federal Register, unless FMCSA receives written adverse comment(s)
or written notice of intent to submit adverse comment(s), received by
the date specified in the direct final rule. These new procedures would
expedite the promulgation of routine or noncontroversial rules by
reducing the time and resources necessary to develop, review, clear,
and publish separate proposed and final rules. FMCSA would not use the
direct final rule procedures for complex or controversial issues.
DATES: You must submit comments on or before April 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Federal Docket
Management System Number in the heading of this document by any of the
following methods. Do not submit the same comments by more than one
method. However, to allow effective public participation before the
comment period deadline, the Agency encourages use of the Web site that
is listed first. It will provide the most efficient and timely method
of receiving and processing your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this regulatory action. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. Refer to the Privacy Act
heading on https://www.regulations.gov for further information.
Public Participation: The regulations.gov system is generally
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can find
electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the
``help'' section of the Web site. For notification that FMCSA received
the comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard, or print the acknowledgement page that appears after
submitting comments on line. Copies or abstracts of all documents
referenced in this notice are in the docket: FMCSA-2009-0354. For
access to the docket to read background documents or comments received,
go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. All comments
received before the close of business on the comment closing date
indicated above will be considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received after
the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments,
FMCSA will also continue to file relevant information in the docket as
it becomes available after the comment period closing date, and
interested persons should continue to examine the docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Mr. Bivan R. Patnaik,
Chief, Regulatory Development Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366-8092.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) specifically
provides that notice and comment rulemaking procedures are not required
where the Agency determines that there is good cause to dispense with
them. Generally, good cause exists where the procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). FMCSA proposes to use direct final rulemaking to
streamline the rulemaking process where the rule is noncontroversial
and the Agency does not expect adverse comment.
Direct final rulemaking would be more efficient in using FMCSA
resources by reducing the time and resources necessary to develop,
review, clear, and publish separate proposed and final rules for rules
the Agency expects to be noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse public comment. A number of Federal agencies use this process,
including various Department of Transportation operating
administrations. For example, on January 30, 2004, the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation (OST) published a final rule adopting
direct final rule procedures (69 FR 4455) and the Federal Railroad
Administration published a final rule adopting direct final rule
procedures on March 7, 2007 (72 FR 10086).
Direct Final Rule Procedures
FMCSA would determine whether a particular rulemaking is
noncontroversial and unlikely to result in adverse comments based on
its experience with similar rules that it previously proposed and
published without receiving adverse comments. Adverse comments are
those comments that are critical of the rule, suggest that the rule
should not be adopted, or suggest a change to the rule. Comments
outside the scope of the rule and comments suggesting that the rule's
policy or requirements should or should not be extended to other Agency
programs outside the scope of the rule would not be considered adverse.
After making the determination that a rule would be appropriate for
direct
[[Page 12721]]
final rulemaking, FMCSA would publish the rule as a direct final rule
in the Federal Register. The document would state in the preamble that
FMCSA does not anticipate adverse comments and that unless it receives
written adverse comments or written notice of intent to submit adverse
comments, the rule would become effective a specified number of days
after the date it is published in the Federal Register. If FMCSA
receives adverse comments, or receives notice of intent to file adverse
comments by the date specified in the direct final rule, it would
publish a rule in the Federal Register withdrawing the direct final
rule before it goes into effect. FMCSA may then publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking with a new comment period if the Agency decides to
go forward with the rulemaking.
If no adverse comments or written notice of intent to submit
adverse comments are received by the date specified in the direct final
rule, FMCSA would publish a rule in the Federal Register stating that
it did not receive any adverse comments and confirming the effective
date of the rule.
Direct final rulemaking may be appropriate for noncontroversial
rules that (1) Make non-substantive clarifications or corrections to
existing rules; (2) incorporate by reference the latest or otherwise
updated versions of technical or industry standards; (3) affect
internal procedures of FMCSA such as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of documents; (4) update existing
forms; (5) make minor changes to rules regarding statistics and
reporting requirements, such as a change in reporting period (for
example, from quarterly to annually) or eliminating a type of data
collection no longer necessary. FMCSA may also use direct final
rulemaking for a particular rule if similar rules had been previously
proposed and published without adverse comment. Even if a rulemaking
falls into one of the above categories, if adverse comments are
anticipated, FMCSA would not use the direct final rule process. The
additional time and resources expended to withdraw the rule and
republish it for comment will serve as an incentive for the Agency to
make careful determinations as to whether this procedure is
appropriate.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FMCSA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 or under the Department's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures. There are no costs associated with
the proposed rule. There would be some cost savings in Federal Register
publication costs and efficiencies for the public and FMCSA personnel
in eliminating duplicative reviews. I certify that this rule would not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Finally, FMCSA believes there are no Federalism implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rulemaking contains no information collection
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
FMCSA has determined that the requirements of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995, do not apply to this proposed
rulemaking.
Environment
FMCSA considered the environmental impacts of this proposed
rulemaking under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and
determined it is categorically excluded from further environmental
analysis under FMCSA Order 5610.1 paragraph 6.x of Appendix 2. FMCSA
Order 5610.1 was published on March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680). A Categorical
Exclusion Determination is available for inspection or copying in the
regulations.gov website listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 389
Rulemaking procedures.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FMCSA proposes to amend
49 CFR part 389 as follows:
PART 389--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 389 is amended to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 113, 501 et seq., subchapters I and III of
chapter 311, chapter 313, and 31502; 42 U.S.C 4917; and 49 CFR 1.73.
2. Section 389.11 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 389.11 General.
Except as provided in Sec. 389.39, Direct final rulemaking
procedures, unless the Administrator, for good cause, finds a rule is
impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and
incorporates such a finding and a brief statement for the reason for it
in the rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking must be issued, and
interested persons are invited to participate in the rulemaking
proceedings involving rules under an Act.
3. Add new Sec. 389.39 to read as follows:
Sec. 389.39 Direct final rulemaking procedures
A direct final rule makes regulatory changes and states that those
changes will take effect on a specified date unless FMCSA receives an
adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse comment by the s
date specified in the direct final rule published in the Federal
Register.
(a) Types of actions appropriate for direct final rulemaking. Rules
that the Administrator determines to be non-controversial and unlikely
to result in adverse public comments may be published in the final rule
section of the Federal Register as direct final rules. These include
non-controversial rules that:
(1) Make non-substantive clarifications or corrections to existing
rules;
(2) Incorporate by reference the latest or otherwise updated
versions of technical or industry standards;
(3) Affect internal FMCSA procedures such as filing requirements
and rules governing inspection and copying of documents;
(4) Update existing forms;
(5) Make minor changes to rules regarding statistics and reporting
requirements, such as a change in reporting period (for example, from
quarterly to annually) or eliminating a type of data collection no
longer necessary;
(b) Adverse Comment. An adverse comment is a comment that FMCSA
judges to be critical of the rule, to suggest that the rule should not
be adopted, or to suggest that a change should be made to the rule.
Under the direct final rule process, FMCSA does not consider the
following types of comments to be adverse:
(1) Comments recommending another rule change, in addition to the
change in the direct final rule at issue, unless the commenter states
that the direct final rule would be ineffective without the change;
(2) Comments outside the scope of the rule and comments suggesting
that the rule's policy or requirements should or should not be extended
to other Agency programs outside the scope of the rule;
(3) Comments in support of the rule; or
(4) Comments requesting clarification.
(c) Confirmation of effective date. FMCSA will publish a
confirmation rule document in the Federal Register, if it has not
received an adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse
comment by the date specified in the direct final rule. The
confirmation rule document tells the public the effective date of the
rule.
[[Page 12722]]
(d) Withdrawal of a direct final rule.
(1) If FMCSA receives an adverse comment or a notice of intent to
file an adverse comment within the comment period, it will publish a
rule document in the Federal Register, before the effective date of the
direct final rule, advising the public and withdrawing the direct final
rule.
(2) If FMCSA withdraws a direct final rule because of an adverse
comment, the Agency may issue a notice of proposed rulemaking if it
decides to pursue the rulemaking.
Issued on: March 10, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-5737 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P