Departmental Management; Public Meeting on BioPreferredSM, 12492-12493 [2010-5681]
Download as PDF
12492
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 50
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Departmental Management; Public
Meeting on BioPreferredSM
Intermediate Material and Feedstock
Product Designation
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Departmental Management,
Office of Procurement and Property
Management.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) will hold a public
meeting on April 1, 2010, for interested
stakeholders to discuss the issue of
intermediate material and feedstock
(IMF) products that contain biobased
materials. Intermediate materials and
feedstocks represent those products
frequently sold business to business,
where the receiving business will use
the product in some subsequent
production or finishing cycle of a
finished product. An example of an IMF
product is a biobased plastic resin that
can be used to produce fibers for fabrics,
films for packaging and disposable
cutlery.
This issue pertains to the designation
by USDA of biobased products for a
Federal Procurement preference, as
mandated by the 2008 Farm Bill.
Speakers will include representatives
from General Services Agency (GSA),
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), and a
former government procurement
official.
DATES: April 1, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
(CST).
MEETING LOCATION: Iowa State
University—Scheman Building at the
intersection of University Boulevard
and Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Pre-registration for the public meeting
on April 1, 2010, is not required but
would be helpful, particularly if you
wish to make a presentation. If you wish
to register to attend the public meeting,
please do so at this Web site: https://
www.ucs.iastate.edu/mnet/biopreferred/
sessionregister.html and state whether
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:33 Mar 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
or not you wish to be recognized to
make a formal presentation. The
meeting is free of charge.
Directions to the Iowa State Center
may be found at https://
www.center.iastate.edu/newsite/guests/
maps.asp and a map of the Iowa State
University campus is accessible at
https://www.fpm.iastate.edu/maps . The
Scheman building is located just west of
the Hilton Coliseum and north of the
Jack Trice Stadium on the Campus Map.
Parking for the event will be in Lots B1
and C1 just north of the building. The
parking is free.
Those unable to attend the public
meeting in person may listen to the
meeting by calling 866–433–4616. The
pass code is ‘‘635195’’. Participants
using the audio bridge may submit
questions or comments during the
meeting to USDABioInfo@iastate.edu or
through the webinar itself, the exact link
of which will be sent to participants via
email after registering.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Buckhalt, BioPreferred Manager, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Office of
Procurement and Property Management,
361 Reporters Building, 300 7th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20024, (202) 205–
4008. RonB.Buckhalt@DA.USDA.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
9002 of the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–
171) established a program for the
procurement of USDA designated
biobased products by Federal agencies
and a voluntary program for the labeling
of USDA certified biobased products.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act
of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–
246) continued these programs and
made certain changes to the Federal
procurement preference program. USDA
refers to the procurement preference
program and the voluntary labeling
program together as the BioPreferredSM
Program.
Due to the changes mandated by the
2008 Farm Bill, and the passage of five
years since USDA first published the
Guidelines for Designated Biobased
Products for Federal Procurement
(Guidelines) (7 CFR 2902), USDA
intends to revise the Guidelines in 2010.
USDA is holding three public meetings
to gather input from interested
stakeholders on what should be
considered when revising the
Guidelines. The first meeting, which
occurred in January in Washington, DC,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressed evaluation of environmental
impacts associated with the
manufacture, use, and disposal of
biobased products. The second meeting,
held in February in Riverside, CA
addressed the designation of complex
assembly products under the
BioPreferred program.
The purpose of the April 1, 2010,
meeting, which is the third of the three
meetings, will be to stimulate
discussion and gather input from
stakeholders on how USDA can
effectively implement the designation of
intermediate material and feedstock
products for Federal preferred
procurement status under the
BioPreferred program as required by the
2008 Farm Bill.
Under the current Guidelines, USDA
designates ‘‘finished’’ products by
collecting information on available
biobased products, manufacturers, and
distributors to determine potential
product categories and tests products for
biobased content using ASTM
International Standard Test Methods for
Determining the Biobased Content of
Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples
Using Radiocarbon Analysis, D–6866.
USDA also evaluates environmental and
human health benefits and lifecycle
costs of categories using the Building for
Environmental and Economic
Sustainability (BEES) model developed
by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology.
To set the stage before opening the
forum for public comment, USDA has
invited to the public meeting speakers
from USDA, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and
individuals from academia and industry
who are well-versed in biobased
materials, manufacturing and products.
USDA is seeking answers to a series of
questions about intermediate material
and feedstock products and their role in
designating biobased products for
Federal procurement.
These questions include:
• How should intermediate products
be defined?
• The proposed rule for the Voluntary
Labeling Program states that
intermediate products and feedstocks do
not include raw agricultural and forestry
materials. How should ‘‘raw agricultural
materials’’ be defined?
• What types of intermediate
products should be included, and how
should they be categorized?
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 16, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
• What entities are best positioned to
help define the possible categories?
• How should the designation of
intermediate ingredients and feedstocks
be organized?
• What categories of intermediate
ingredients/feedstocks currently have
the greatest potential to expand product
eligibility for the BioPreferred program,
and what high-impact categories might
be expected to emerge over the next five
years?
• What should be the minimum
allowable biobased content for
intermediate products and feed stocks?
• What information should be
provided to assist purchasing decision
makers?
• Will federal procurement agencies
ever purchase intermediate ingredients,
or will they be purchasing only end-use
products?
• What are the potential obstacles to
designating intermediate products and
ingredients for preferred procurement
status?
recommendations on public and private
sector actions that can be taken to solve
the problem.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be submitted or
postmarked on or before March 26,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be submitted by fax
or by mail to: Director, Office of
Executive Secretariat, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Room 116–A Whitten
Building, Washington, DC 20250 (FAX:
202–720–7166); however, respondents
are strongly encouraged to submit
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov, as it will simplify
the review of their input and help to
ensure that it receives full
consideration. All comments submitted
in response to this notice will be
Dated: March 10, 2010.
included in the record and will be made
Pearlie S. Reed,
available to the public. Please be
advised that the substance of the
Assistant Secretary for Administration, U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
comments and the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
[FR Doc. 2010–5681 Filed 3–15–10; 8:45 am]
comments will be subject to public
BILLING CODE P
disclosure. All comments will be made
available publicly on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Alexia Green, Office of the Executive
HUMAN SERVICES
Secretariat, United States Department of
Agriculture, 202–720–1570.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Nearly
one-third of children in America are
Task Force on Childhood Obesity:
overweight or obese—a rate that has
Request for Information
tripled in adolescents and more than
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Agriculture, doubled in younger children since 1980.
One-third of all individuals born in the
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, U.S. Department of Education. year 2000 or later will eventually suffer
from diabetes over the course of their
ACTION: Joint request for comments.
lifetime, while too many others will face
SUMMARY: Across the country, childhood chronic obesity-related health problems
obesity has reached epidemic rates. On
such as heart disease, high blood
February 9, 2010, President Obama
pressure, cancer, and asthma. Without
signed a Presidential Memo establishing effective intervention, many more
a Task Force on Childhood Obesity that children will endure serious illnesses
directs Federal agencies to create a
that will put a strain on our health-care
comprehensive interagency national
system and reduce their quality of life.
President Obama has set a goal to
action plan to solve the challenge of
solve the problem of childhood obesity
childhood obesity within a generation.
The Presidential Memo directs the Task within a generation so that children
born today will reach adulthood at a
Force to focus on four pillars: Ensuring
healthy weight. To reach that goal,
access to healthy, affordable food;
President Obama signed a Presidential
increasing physical activity in schools
Memorandum on February 9, 2010,
and communities; providing healthier
establishing a Task Force on Childhood
food in schools; and empowering
Obesity that directs Federal agencies to
parents with information and tools to
create a comprehensive interagency
make good choices for themselves and
national action plan to solve the
their families. This notice announces a
challenge of childhood obesity within a
request for public comments to assist
generation. The Task Force is chaired by
the Task Force in making
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:33 Mar 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12493
the Assistant to the President for
Domestic Policy and composed of senior
Federal officials representing the White
House, the Office of Management and
Budget, and the Departments of Interior,
Agriculture, Health and Human
Services, and Education, as well as
senior officials of other executive
departments, agencies, or offices
designated by the chair. The
Presidential Memorandum directs the
Task Force to make recommendations
that include, but are not limited to,
meeting four objectives: (1) Ensuring
access to healthy, affordable food; (2)
increasing physical activity in schools
and communities; (3) providing
healthier food in schools; and (4)
empowering parents with information
and tools to make good choices for
themselves and their families.
The specific responsibilities of the
Task Force are to:
1. Detail a coordinated strategy by
executive departments and agencies to
meet the objectives of the Task Force
and identify areas for reform to ensure
complementary efforts and avoid
duplication, both across the Federal
Government and between other public
or nongovernmental actors;
2. Include comprehensive, multisectoral strategies from each member
executive department, agency, or office
and describe the status and scope of its
efforts to achieve this goal;
3. Identify key benchmarks and
provide for regular measurement,
assessment, and reporting of executive
branch efforts to combat childhood
obesity;
4. Describe a coordinated action plan
for identifying relevant evidence gaps
and conducting or facilitating needed
research to fill those gaps;
5. Assist in the assessment and
development of legislative, budgetary,
and policy proposals that can improve
the health and well-being of children,
their families, and communities; and
6. Describe potential areas of
collaboration with other public or
nongovernmental actors, taking into
consideration the types of
implementation or research objectives
the Federal Government, other public
actors, or nongovernmental actors may
be particularly well-situated to
accomplish.
In addition, the Presidential Memo
directs the Task Force to conduct
outreach with representatives of private
and nonprofit organizations, State,
tribal, and local authorities, and other
interested persons who can assist with
the Task Force’s development of a
detailed set of recommendations to
solve the problem of childhood obesity.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12492-12493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5681]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 16, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 12492]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Departmental Management; Public Meeting on BioPreferred\SM\
Intermediate Material and Feedstock Product Designation
AGENCY: Departmental Management, Office of Procurement and Property
Management.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will hold a public
meeting on April 1, 2010, for interested stakeholders to discuss the
issue of intermediate material and feedstock (IMF) products that
contain biobased materials. Intermediate materials and feedstocks
represent those products frequently sold business to business, where
the receiving business will use the product in some subsequent
production or finishing cycle of a finished product. An example of an
IMF product is a biobased plastic resin that can be used to produce
fibers for fabrics, films for packaging and disposable cutlery.
This issue pertains to the designation by USDA of biobased products
for a Federal Procurement preference, as mandated by the 2008 Farm
Bill.
Speakers will include representatives from General Services Agency
(GSA), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), and a former government
procurement official.
DATES: April 1, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. (CST).
MEETING LOCATION: Iowa State University--Scheman Building at the
intersection of University Boulevard and Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Pre-registration for the public meeting on April 1, 2010, is not
required but would be helpful, particularly if you wish to make a
presentation. If you wish to register to attend the public meeting,
please do so at this Web site: https://www.ucs.iastate.edu/mnet/biopreferred/sessionregister.html and state whether or not you wish to
be recognized to make a formal presentation. The meeting is free of
charge.
Directions to the Iowa State Center may be found at https://www.center.iastate.edu/newsite/guests/maps.asp and a map of the Iowa
State University campus is accessible at https://www.fpm.iastate.edu/maps . The Scheman building is located just west of the Hilton Coliseum
and north of the Jack Trice Stadium on the Campus Map. Parking for the
event will be in Lots B1 and C1 just north of the building. The parking
is free.
Those unable to attend the public meeting in person may listen to
the meeting by calling 866-433-4616. The pass code is ``635195''.
Participants using the audio bridge may submit questions or comments
during the meeting to USDABioInfo@iastate.edu or through the webinar
itself, the exact link of which will be sent to participants via email
after registering.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Buckhalt, BioPreferred Manager,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Procurement and Property
Management, 361 Reporters Building, 300 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20024, (202) 205-4008. RonB.Buckhalt@DA.USDA.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-171) established a program for the
procurement of USDA designated biobased products by Federal agencies
and a voluntary program for the labeling of USDA certified biobased
products. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm
Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246) continued these programs and made certain
changes to the Federal procurement preference program. USDA refers to
the procurement preference program and the voluntary labeling program
together as the BioPreferred\SM\ Program.
Due to the changes mandated by the 2008 Farm Bill, and the passage
of five years since USDA first published the Guidelines for Designated
Biobased Products for Federal Procurement (Guidelines) (7 CFR 2902),
USDA intends to revise the Guidelines in 2010. USDA is holding three
public meetings to gather input from interested stakeholders on what
should be considered when revising the Guidelines. The first meeting,
which occurred in January in Washington, DC, addressed evaluation of
environmental impacts associated with the manufacture, use, and
disposal of biobased products. The second meeting, held in February in
Riverside, CA addressed the designation of complex assembly products
under the BioPreferred program.
The purpose of the April 1, 2010, meeting, which is the third of
the three meetings, will be to stimulate discussion and gather input
from stakeholders on how USDA can effectively implement the designation
of intermediate material and feedstock products for Federal preferred
procurement status under the BioPreferred program as required by the
2008 Farm Bill.
Under the current Guidelines, USDA designates ``finished'' products
by collecting information on available biobased products,
manufacturers, and distributors to determine potential product
categories and tests products for biobased content using ASTM
International Standard Test Methods for Determining the Biobased
Content of Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon
Analysis, D-6866. USDA also evaluates environmental and human health
benefits and lifecycle costs of categories using the Building for
Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) model developed by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
To set the stage before opening the forum for public comment, USDA
has invited to the public meeting speakers from USDA, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and individuals from academia and industry who
are well-versed in biobased materials, manufacturing and products. USDA
is seeking answers to a series of questions about intermediate material
and feedstock products and their role in designating biobased products
for Federal procurement.
These questions include:
How should intermediate products be defined?
The proposed rule for the Voluntary Labeling Program
states that intermediate products and feedstocks do not include raw
agricultural and forestry materials. How should ``raw agricultural
materials'' be defined?
What types of intermediate products should be included,
and how should they be categorized?
[[Page 12493]]
What entities are best positioned to help define the
possible categories?
How should the designation of intermediate ingredients and
feedstocks be organized?
What categories of intermediate ingredients/feedstocks
currently have the greatest potential to expand product eligibility for
the BioPreferred program, and what high-impact categories might be
expected to emerge over the next five years?
What should be the minimum allowable biobased content for
intermediate products and feed stocks?
What information should be provided to assist purchasing
decision makers?
Will federal procurement agencies ever purchase
intermediate ingredients, or will they be purchasing only end-use
products?
What are the potential obstacles to designating
intermediate products and ingredients for preferred procurement status?
Dated: March 10, 2010.
Pearlie S. Reed,
Assistant Secretary for Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2010-5681 Filed 3-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P