Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery, 12141-12143 [2010-5601]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
seat is moved from the full forward
position, maintain, as closely as
possible, the seat cushion reference line
angle determined in S10.3.2.3.3, for the
final forward position when measuring
the pelvic angle as specified in
S12.3.2(a)(11). The seat cushion
reference line angle position may be
achieved through the use of any seat or
seat cushion adjustments other than that
which primarily moves the seat or seat
cushion fore-aft.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) For vehicles without adjustable
seat backs, adjust the lower neck bracket
to level the head as much as possible.
For vehicles with adjustable seat backs,
while holding the thighs in place, rotate
the seat back forward until the
transverse instrumentation platform of
the head is level to within ± 0.5 degree,
making sure that the pelvis does not
interfere with the seat bight. If the torso
contacts the steering wheel, adjust the
steering wheel in the following order
until there is no contact: telescoping
adjustment, lowering adjustment,
raising adjustment. If the vehicle has no
adjustments or contact with the steering
wheel cannot be eliminated by
adjustment, position the seat at the next
detent where there is no contact with
the steering wheel as adjusted in S10.5.
If the seat is a power seat, position the
seat to avoid contact while assuring that
there is a maximum of 5 mm (0.2 in)
distance between the steering wheel as
adjusted in S10.5 and the point of
contact on the dummy. Adjust the lower
neck bracket to level the head as much
as possible.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) If the left foot does not contact the
floor pan, place the foot parallel to the
floor and place the leg as perpendicular
to the thigh as possible. If necessary to
avoid contact with the vehicle’s brake
pedal, clutch pedal, wheel-well, or foot
rest, use the three foot position
adjustments listed in S12.3.2(b)(6)(i)
through (iii). The adjustment options are
listed in priority order, with each
subsequent option incorporating the
previous. In making each adjustment,
move the foot the minimum distance
necessary to avoid contact. If it is not
possible to avoid all prohibited foot
contact, priority is given to avoiding
brake or clutch pedal contact:
*
*
*
*
*
S12.3.3 * * *
(a) * * *
(1) With the seat at the mid-height in
the full-forward position determined in
S10.3.2, use only the control that
primarily moves the seat fore and aft to
place the seat in the rearmost position,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:02 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
12141
without adjusting independent height
controls. If the seat cushion reference
line angle automatically changes as the
seat is moved from the full forward
position, maintain, as closely as
possible, the seat cushion reference line
angle determined in S10.3.2.3.3, for the
final forward position when measuring
the pelvic angle as specified in
S12.3.3(a)(11). The seat cushion
reference line angle position may be
achieved through the use of any seat or
seat cushion adjustments other than that
which primarily moves the seat or seat
cushion fore-aft.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) For vehicles without adjustable
seat backs, adjust the lower neck bracket
to level the head as much as possible.
For vehicles with adjustable seat backs,
while holding the thighs in place, rotate
the seat back forward until the
transverse instrumentation platform of
the head is level to within ± 0.5 degree,
making sure that the pelvis does not
interfere with the seat bight.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) If either foot does not contact the
floor pan, place the foot parallel to the
floor pan and place the lower leg as
perpendicular to the thigh as possible.
*
*
*
*
*
S12.3.4 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(h) For vehicles without adjustable
seat backs, adjust the lower neck bracket
to level the head as much as possible.
For vehicles with adjustable seat backs,
while holding the thighs in place, rotate
the seat back forward until the
transverse instrumentation platform of
the head is level to within ± 0.5 degrees,
making sure that the pelvis does not
interfere with the seat bight.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Passenger foot positioning.
(1) Place the rear seat passenger’s feet
flat on the floor pan and beneath the
front seat as far as possible without front
seat interference.
(2) If either foot does not contact the
floor pan, place the foot parallel to the
floor and place the leg as perpendicular
to the thigh as possible.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 571.301 is amended by
revising S6.3(b), to read as follows:
moving deformable barrier at 53 ± 1.0
km/h with the appropriate 49 CFR part
572 test dummies specified in 571.214
at positions required for testing by
S7.1.1, S7.2.1, or S7.2.2 of Standard 214,
under the applicable conditions of S7 of
this standard, fuel spillage shall not
exceed the limits of S5.5 of this
standard.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 571.305 is amended by
revising S6.3 and S7.5, to read as
follows:
§ 571.301
integrity.
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
Standard No. 301; Fuel system
*
*
*
*
*
S6.3 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Vehicles manufactured on or after
September 1, 2004. When the vehicle is
impacted laterally on either side by a
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 571.305 Standard No. 305; Electricpowered vehicles: electrolyte spillage and
electrical shock protection.
*
*
*
*
*
S6.3 Side moving deformable barrier
impact. The vehicle must meet the
requirements of S5.1, S5.2 and S5.3
when it is impacted from the side by a
barrier that conforms to part 587 of this
chapter that is moving at any speed up
to and including 54 km/h, with the
appropriate 49 CFR part 572 test
dummies specified in 571.214 of this
chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
S7.5 Side moving deformable barrier
impact test conditions. In addition to
the conditions of S7.1 and S7.2, the
conditions of S8.9, S8.10, and S8.11 of
571.214 of this chapter apply to the
conduct of the side moving deformable
barrier impact test specified in S6.3.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued: March 9, 2010.
David L. Strickland,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–5575 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0907221160–91412–02]
RIN 0648–AY01
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Monkfish
Fishery
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to
amend the Monkfish Fishery
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
12142
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Management Plan (FMP) to allow
projects funded through the Monkfish
Research Set-Aside (RSA) Program to
carryover unused monkfish RSA daysat-sea (DAS) into the following fishing
year. This final rule also makes minor
technical changes to the monkfish
regulations. The changes are purely
technical amendments to ensure
consistency with the operations of the
Monkfish RSA Program and to clarify
the intent of the regulations
implementing this program.
DATES: This rule is effective April 14,
2010.
This document and other
supporting material are available online
at https://www.regulations.gov or
www.nero.nmfs.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Macan, Fishery Management
Specialist, phone (978) 281–9165, or by
e-mail at Anna.Macan@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Background
This final rule implements measures
to the FMP to allow unused monkfish
RSA DAS to carryover into the
following fishing year. A proposed rule
for this action was published on October
26, 2009 (74 FR 54945), with public
comments accepted through November
25, 2009. The details on the
development of this action, including
the alternatives considered by NMFS,
were contained in the preamble of the
proposed rule and are not repeated here.
During the development of the
Monkfish RSA Program through
Amendment 2 to the FMP, NMFS
implemented a regulation under its
administrative authority, at section
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) to prohibit the
carryover of unused monkfish RSA DAS
(§ 648.92(c)(1)(v)). NMFS took this
action due to the status of the stock at
the time; at the time Amendment 2 was
being implemented, monkfish were
considered overfished in both
management areas, with little sign of
rebuilding. Since the stock is now
considered to be rebuilt, the restriction
on carrying over RSA DAS is no longer
necessary.
This regulatory amendment allows for
the rollover of all unused monkfish RSA
DAS. Allowing Monkfish RSA DAS to
carryover into the following fishing year
will provide researchers the flexibility
they need to complete projects funded
through the Monkfish RSA Program. If
carryover DAS are discontinued in the
commercial fishery, NMFS will
reconsider whether rollover of RSA DAS
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:02 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
should be allowed under the Monkfish
RSA Program.
Comments and Responses
Two comments were received, both in
support of the proposed measure to
allow the rollover of all unused RSA
DAS, which NMFS is implementing
through this final rule.
Comment 1: One commenter
supported the action because, in past
years, attempts to utilize RSA DAS to
conduct key research were constrained
by the available number of RSA DAS
and issues related to time and revenue
recovery. The commenter stated that
this action will provide for more flexible
implementation of the RSA Program and
will hopefully promote interest in
industry-sponsored research.
Response: NMFS agrees, and is
implementing the measures in this final
rule.
Comment 2: The second comment
acknowledged general support for this
action.
Response: NMFS is implementing the
measures in this final rule.
Changes from the Proposed Rule
This final rule makes additional
technical amendments to the monkfish
research regulatory text at § 648.92(c).
The minor changes clarify the intent of
the regulations and ensure consistency
with the operations of the Monkfish
RSA Program.
In § 648.92(c)(1)(i), language stating
that NMFS will publish a Request for
Proposals (RFP) in the Federal Register
at least 3 months prior to the start of the
upcoming fishing year has been
removed. This will allow NMFS to
publish an RFP in accordance with
NOAA Grants Office procedures. The
text ‘‘from industry’’ at the end of that
paragraph has also been removed to
clarify that proposals are solicited from
an inclusive range of applicants (e.g.,
research institutions) and are not
limited to fishing industry members
only.
Section § 648.92(c)(1)(ii) has been
revised to reflect that the review panel
will include subject matter experts, as
opposed to technical experts.
Section § 648.92(c)(1)(ii)(B) has been
revised to reflect that NMFS and the
NOAA Grants Office will consider each
panels recommendations, and that
NOAA will provide the final approval of
projects, which is the current procedure.
The last sentence in
§ 648.92(c)(1)(ii)(B) has been removed
because this action will allow monkfish
RSA DAS to carry into the following
fishing year, making this sentence no
longer relevant.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Classification
The Administrator for the Northeast
Region, NMFS, determined that the
FMP amendment is necessary for the
conservation and management of the
monkfish fishery and that it is
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
the Assistant Administrator finds that
advance notice and public comment on
the portion of this rule that implements
the technical changes to the regulations
implementing the Monkfish RSA
Program is not necessary. These
technical changes are not substantive.
They merely revise the regulations to
clarify their intent and to be consistent
with current procedures of the Monkfish
RSA Program, and are consistent with
the FMP.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
final rule, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification
appeared in the preamble of the
proposed rule. No comments were
received regarding the economic impact
of this action. As a result, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required and
none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended
as follows:
■
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.92, paragraphs (c)(1)(i),
(c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(ii)(B), (c)(1)(iii), and
(c)(1)(v) are revised to read as follows:
■
§ 648.92 Effort-control program for
monkfish limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) NMFS shall publish a Request for
Proposals (RFP) in the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
consistent with procedures and
requirements established by the NOAA
Grants Office to solicit proposals for the
upcoming fishing year that are based on
research priorities identified by the
Councils.
(ii) NMFS shall convene a review
panel that may include members of the
Councils’ Monkfish Oversight
Committee, the Council’s Research
Steering Committee, and other subject
matter experts, to review proposals
submitted in response to the RFP.
*
*
*
*
*
(B) NMFS and the NOAA Grants
Office shall consider each panel
member’s recommendation, and NOAA
shall provide final approval of the
projects, and notify applicants of the
grant award through written notification
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:02 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
to the project proponent. The Regional
Administrator may exempt selected
vessel(s) from regulations specified in
each of the respective FMPs through the
exempted fishing permit (EFP) process
specified under § 600.745(b)(2).
(iii) The grant awards approved under
the RFPs shall be for the upcoming
fishing year. Proposals to fund research
that would start prior to the fishing year
are not eligible for consideration. Multiyear grant awards may be approved
under an RFP for an upcoming fishing
year, so long as the research DAS
available under subsequent RFPs are
adjusted to account for the approval of
multi-year awards.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) If the Regional Administrator
determines that the annual allocation of
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
12143
research DAS will not be used in its
entirety once all of the grant awards
have been approved, the Regional
Administrator shall reallocate the
unallocated research DAS as exempted
DAS to be authorized as described in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and
provide notice of the reallocation of
DAS in the Federal Register. Any
allocated research DAS that are not used
during the fishing year for which they
are granted may be carried over into the
next fishing year. Any unallocated
research DAS may not be carried over
into the next fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–5601 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 49 (Monday, March 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12141-12143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5601]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0907221160-91412-02]
RIN 0648-AY01
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to amend the Monkfish Fishery
[[Page 12142]]
Management Plan (FMP) to allow projects funded through the Monkfish
Research Set-Aside (RSA) Program to carryover unused monkfish RSA days-
at-sea (DAS) into the following fishing year. This final rule also
makes minor technical changes to the monkfish regulations. The changes
are purely technical amendments to ensure consistency with the
operations of the Monkfish RSA Program and to clarify the intent of the
regulations implementing this program.
DATES: This rule is effective April 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: This document and other supporting material are available
online at https://www.regulations.gov or www.nero.nmfs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Macan, Fishery Management
Specialist, phone (978) 281-9165, or by e-mail at Anna.Macan@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule implements measures to the FMP to allow unused
monkfish RSA DAS to carryover into the following fishing year. A
proposed rule for this action was published on October 26, 2009 (74 FR
54945), with public comments accepted through November 25, 2009. The
details on the development of this action, including the alternatives
considered by NMFS, were contained in the preamble of the proposed rule
and are not repeated here.
During the development of the Monkfish RSA Program through
Amendment 2 to the FMP, NMFS implemented a regulation under its
administrative authority, at section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) to
prohibit the carryover of unused monkfish RSA DAS (Sec.
648.92(c)(1)(v)). NMFS took this action due to the status of the stock
at the time; at the time Amendment 2 was being implemented, monkfish
were considered overfished in both management areas, with little sign
of rebuilding. Since the stock is now considered to be rebuilt, the
restriction on carrying over RSA DAS is no longer necessary.
This regulatory amendment allows for the rollover of all unused
monkfish RSA DAS. Allowing Monkfish RSA DAS to carryover into the
following fishing year will provide researchers the flexibility they
need to complete projects funded through the Monkfish RSA Program. If
carryover DAS are discontinued in the commercial fishery, NMFS will
reconsider whether rollover of RSA DAS should be allowed under the
Monkfish RSA Program.
Comments and Responses
Two comments were received, both in support of the proposed measure
to allow the rollover of all unused RSA DAS, which NMFS is implementing
through this final rule.
Comment 1: One commenter supported the action because, in past
years, attempts to utilize RSA DAS to conduct key research were
constrained by the available number of RSA DAS and issues related to
time and revenue recovery. The commenter stated that this action will
provide for more flexible implementation of the RSA Program and will
hopefully promote interest in industry-sponsored research.
Response: NMFS agrees, and is implementing the measures in this
final rule.
Comment 2: The second comment acknowledged general support for this
action.
Response: NMFS is implementing the measures in this final rule.
Changes from the Proposed Rule
This final rule makes additional technical amendments to the
monkfish research regulatory text at Sec. 648.92(c). The minor changes
clarify the intent of the regulations and ensure consistency with the
operations of the Monkfish RSA Program.
In Sec. 648.92(c)(1)(i), language stating that NMFS will publish a
Request for Proposals (RFP) in the Federal Register at least 3 months
prior to the start of the upcoming fishing year has been removed. This
will allow NMFS to publish an RFP in accordance with NOAA Grants Office
procedures. The text ``from industry'' at the end of that paragraph has
also been removed to clarify that proposals are solicited from an
inclusive range of applicants (e.g., research institutions) and are not
limited to fishing industry members only.
Section Sec. 648.92(c)(1)(ii) has been revised to reflect that the
review panel will include subject matter experts, as opposed to
technical experts.
Section Sec. 648.92(c)(1)(ii)(B) has been revised to reflect that
NMFS and the NOAA Grants Office will consider each panels
recommendations, and that NOAA will provide the final approval of
projects, which is the current procedure.
The last sentence in Sec. 648.92(c)(1)(ii)(B) has been removed
because this action will allow monkfish RSA DAS to carry into the
following fishing year, making this sentence no longer relevant.
Classification
The Administrator for the Northeast Region, NMFS, determined that
the FMP amendment is necessary for the conservation and management of
the monkfish fishery and that it is consistent with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other applicable
laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Assistant Administrator
finds that advance notice and public comment on the portion of this
rule that implements the technical changes to the regulations
implementing the Monkfish RSA Program is not necessary. These technical
changes are not substantive. They merely revise the regulations to
clarify their intent and to be consistent with current procedures of
the Monkfish RSA Program, and are consistent with the FMP.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this final rule, if adopted, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification appeared in the preamble of
the proposed rule. No comments were received regarding the economic
impact of this action. As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis
was not required and none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended as
follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.92, paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(ii)(B),
(c)(1)(iii), and (c)(1)(v) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.92 Effort-control program for monkfish limited access
vessels.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) NMFS shall publish a Request for Proposals (RFP) in the Federal
Register
[[Page 12143]]
consistent with procedures and requirements established by the NOAA
Grants Office to solicit proposals for the upcoming fishing year that
are based on research priorities identified by the Councils.
(ii) NMFS shall convene a review panel that may include members of
the Councils' Monkfish Oversight Committee, the Council's Research
Steering Committee, and other subject matter experts, to review
proposals submitted in response to the RFP.
* * * * *
(B) NMFS and the NOAA Grants Office shall consider each panel
member's recommendation, and NOAA shall provide final approval of the
projects, and notify applicants of the grant award through written
notification to the project proponent. The Regional Administrator may
exempt selected vessel(s) from regulations specified in each of the
respective FMPs through the exempted fishing permit (EFP) process
specified under Sec. 600.745(b)(2).
(iii) The grant awards approved under the RFPs shall be for the
upcoming fishing year. Proposals to fund research that would start
prior to the fishing year are not eligible for consideration. Multi-
year grant awards may be approved under an RFP for an upcoming fishing
year, so long as the research DAS available under subsequent RFPs are
adjusted to account for the approval of multi-year awards.
* * * * *
(v) If the Regional Administrator determines that the annual
allocation of research DAS will not be used in its entirety once all of
the grant awards have been approved, the Regional Administrator shall
reallocate the unallocated research DAS as exempted DAS to be
authorized as described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and
provide notice of the reallocation of DAS in the Federal Register. Any
allocated research DAS that are not used during the fishing year for
which they are granted may be carried over into the next fishing year.
Any unallocated research DAS may not be carried over into the next
fishing year.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-5601 Filed 3-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S