Program Comment for the Department of the Navy for the Disposition of Historic Vessels, 12245-12249 [2010-5373]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Notices
teleconference line. There will be 50
lines for this call; availability will be on
a first-come, first-served basis. The
available lines will be open from 8 a.m.
until 5:30 p.m. on May 10, although
public comments will be received only
during the formal public comment
periods, which will be indicated on the
preliminary agenda. Each organization
is allowed one time slot per agenda
topic. At least 7 minutes will be allotted
to each speaker, and if time permits,
may be extended to 10 minutes at the
discretion of the BSC chair. Persons
wishing to present oral comments are
encouraged to pre-register on the NTP
meeting Web site and indicate whether
they will present comments in-person or
via the teleconference line. The access
number will be provided prior to the
meeting. Registration for oral comments
will also be available on May 10,
although time allowed for presentation
by these registrants may be less than
that for pre-registered speakers and will
be determined by the number of persons
who register at the meeting.
Persons registering to make oral
comments are asked to send a copy of
their statement to the Designated
Federal Officer for the BSC (see
ADDRESSES above) by May 3, 2010, to
enable review by the BSC prior to the
meeting. Written statements can
supplement and may expand the oral
presentation. If registering on-site and
reading from written text, please bring
40 copies of the statement for
distribution to the BSC and NTP staff
and to supplement the record.
Registered speakers using PowerPoint
slides with their oral comments should
send them to the Designated Federal
Officer (see ADDRESSES) by May 3, 2010.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background Information on the NTP
Board of Scientific Counselors
The BSC is a technical advisory body
comprised of scientists from the public
and private sectors that provides
primary scientific oversight to the NTP.
Specifically, the BSC advises the NTP
on matters of scientific program content,
both present and future, and conducts
periodic review of the program for the
purpose of determining and advising on
the scientific merit of its activities and
their overall scientific quality. Its
members are selected from recognized
authorities knowledgeable in fields such
as toxicology, pharmacology, pathology,
biochemistry, epidemiology, risk
assessment, carcinogenesis,
mutagenesis, molecular biology,
behavioral toxicology, neurotoxicology,
immunotoxicology, reproductive
toxicology or teratology, and
biostatistics. Members serve overlapping
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:07 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
12245
terms of up to four years. The BSC
usually meets biannually.
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
Dated: March 5, 2010.
John R. Bucher,
Associate Director, National Toxicology
Program.
Program Comment for the Department
of the Navy for the Disposition of
Historic Vessels
[FR Doc. 2010–5608 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Institute of Child Health & Human
Development; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development
Special Emphasis Panel; Human Capital
Interventions Across Childhood and
Adolescence.
Date: April 6, 2010.
Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100
Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Rockville,
MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Division Of
Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(301) 435–6898, wallsc@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research;
93.865, Research for Mothers and Children;
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation
Research; 93.209, Contraception and
Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–5620 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY: Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of Program
Comments for the Department of the
Navy for the Disposition of Historic
Vessels.
SUMMARY: The Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation has issued a
Program Comment for the Department of
the Navy setting forth the way in which
it will comply with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act with
regard to the determination of National
Register of Historic Places eligibility of
its vessels and the treatment of adverse
effects that may result from their
disposition.
DATES: The Program Comment was
issued, and went into effect, on March
5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address any questions
concerning this Program Comment to
Dr. Tom McCulloch, Office of Federal
Agency Programs, Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 803,
Washington, DC 20004. Fax (202) 606–
8647. You may address questions
through electronic mail to:
tmcculloch@achp.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr.
Tom McCulloch, (202) 606–8554,
tmcculloch@achp.gov.
Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act requires Federal
agencies to consider the effects of their
undertakings on historic properties and
to provide the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP) a
reasonable opportunity to comment
with regard to such undertakings. The
ACHP has issued the regulations that set
forth the process through which Federal
agencies comply with these duties.
Those regulations are codified under 36
CFR part 800 (Section 106 regulations)
Under Section 800.14(e) of those
regulations, agencies can request the
ACHP to provide a ‘‘Program Comment’’
on a particular category of undertakings
in lieu of conducting individual reviews
of each individual undertaking under
such category, as set forth in 36 CFR
800.4 through 800.7. An agency can
meet its Section 106 responsibilities
with regard to the effects of particular
aspects of those undertakings by taking
into account ACHP’s Program Comment
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
12246
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Notices
and following the steps set forth in that
comment.
I. Background
On March 5, 2010, the ACHP issued
a Program Comment to the Department
of the Navy (Navy) that sets forth the
way in which it will comply with
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act with regard to the
determination of National Register of
Historic Places (National Register)
eligibility of its vessels and the
treatment of adverse effects that may
result from their disposition.
On January 22, 2010 the ACHP
published in the Federal Register its
‘‘Notice of Intent to Issue Program
Comments for the Department of the
Navy for the Disposition of Historic
Vessels.’’ Please refer to that notice for
additional background on the Program
Comment (75 FR 3746–3750).
The ACHP also notified via e-mail
State and Tribal Historic Preservation
Officers, Indian tribes and Native
Hawaiian Organizations, and other
preservation partners of its intent and
provided them with the Federal
Register notice.
A total of 6 comments were received
by the end of the comment period on
February 12. Most of the comments
centered on the need to keep the SHPOs
better informed regarding the Navy’s
statements of eligibility or noneligibility
of the vessels to be decommissioned in
the following year and when the Navy
would strike those historic vessels from
the Naval Vessel Register and dispose of
them.
Other comments asked for
clarification of various issues, such as
whether the applicability of the program
comment is limited to floating vessels (it
is) and whether the program comment
would preclude the disposition of
vessels for recycling (it does not).
After the close of the comment period,
the ACHP staff met with their Navy
counterparts to address the comments
and make edits as appropriate. The
issued version of the Program Comment,
reproduced below, reflects such edits.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Final Text of the Program Comment
The following is the text of issued
Program Comment:
Program Comment Pursuant to 36
CFR 800.14(e) Implementing Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act for the Evaluation of
Vessels for Eligibility for Listing in the
National Register of Historic Places and
the Treatment of Eligible Vessels to
Resolve Adverse Effects that May Result
from Certain Methods of Final
Disposition
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
I. Introduction
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHP) requires Federal
agencies to ‘‘take into account the effect
of [ an] undertaking on any * * *
structure * * * eligible for inclusion in
the National Register’’ and to ‘‘afford the
Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation * * * a reasonable
opportunity to comment with regard to
such undertaking.’’ Regulations
promulgated by the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and
codified at 36 CFR Part 800 describe the
procedures Federal agencies must
follow to meet their Section 106
obligations. Under 36 CFR 800.14, the
ACHP provides Federal agencies with ‘‘a
variety of alternative methods * * * to
meet their Section 106 obligations,’’
thereby allowing agencies ‘‘to tailor the
Section 106 process to their needs.’’ (65
FR 77698–01)
The following Program Comment was
proposed by the Navy, and issued by the
ACHP on (date to be determined),
pursuant to 36 CFR 800.14(e). The
Program Comment benefits the Navy
and the historic preservation
stakeholders by providing the Navy
with a process for evaluating floating
vessels to determine eligibility for
listing in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) for Section 106
and Section 110 purposes. The Program
Comment also provides a Section 106
method of treatment of eligible vessels
to resolve adverse effects that result
from certain methods of final
disposition. The Program Comment will
enable Navy decision-makers to apply
the eligibility criteria as defined by the
National Park Service (NPS) at 36 CFR
Part 60 to vessels in active service and
decommissioned vessels. Furthermore,
the Program Comment will give the
public and various historic preservation
stakeholders opportunities to provide
input regarding a vessel’s eligibility for
listing in the NRHP. The Program
Comment will establish a type of
treatment (i.e., collecting documentation
in accordance with Section IV of this
Program) that will begin immediately
from the time a vessel is determined
eligible, and thus, well before a Navy
decision to dispose of the vessel.
Finally, the Program Comment will
clarify that the Navy will not need to
conduct Section 106 reviews regarding
effects to active vessels.
By implementing the Program
Comment, the Navy will no longer be
required to follow the standard Section
106 process for each final disposition
decision affecting inactive vessels. In
addition to satisfying the Navy’s
obligations under Section 106 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NHPA for vessels, the Program
Comment enables the Navy to fulfill its
responsibility under Section 110 of the
NHPA to manage and maintain vessels
that may be eligible for listing in the
NRHP in a way that considers the
preservation of their historic value.
II. Background
Naval vessels are the ships and
service craft built by and for the Navy,
used in furthering the Navy’s military
mission, and listed in the Naval Vessel
Register (NVR). Naval vessels are an
unusual type of historic property. They
are mobile assets that are put into
harm’s way and remain in active service
for typically less than fifty years.
Because naval vessels have a limited
useful life, the Chief of Naval
Operations undertakes a Ship
Disposition Review (SDR) each year to
determine whether any vessels should
be decommissioned from active service.
The total number of vessels to be
decommissioned varies from year to
year, but currently averages eight per
year.
Upon the decommissioning of a
vessel, the Secretary of the Navy is
authorized, under 10 U.S.C. 7304, to
strike the vessel from the NVR. By the
authority of the Secretary of the Navy
under 10 U.S.C. 5 7305–7307, stricken
Navy vessels may be: (1) Sold; (2)
dismantled; (3) transferred, by gift or
otherwise, to any State, Commonwealth,
or possession of the U.S., the District of
Columbia, or non-profit entity; (4) used
for experimental purposes, including
Navy sink exercises (SINKEXes); (5)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any
State, Commonwealth or possession of
the U.S. for use as an artificial reef; or
(6) disposed to a foreign nation by sale,
lease, grant, loan, barter, transfer or
otherwise. These six methods of final
disposition, which are ‘‘undertakings’’ as
defined by 36 CFR 800.16(y), are
available to the Navy because it is
neither cost effective nor consistent
with the Navy’s mission to retain
vessels that have surpassed their useful
life.
III. Determining Eligibility for Listing in
the NRHP
A. Criteria
The Secretary of the Interior, through
the NPS, established four criteria
pursuant to its authority under the
NHPA for determining whether property
is eligible for listing in the NRHP. The
four evaluation criteria are codified at
36 CFR 60.4 and listed below. The Navy
is required to evaluate vessels for
eligibility for listing in the NRHP using
the four evaluation criteria:
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
i. Are associated with events that have
made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of our history;
ii. are associated with the lives of
persons significant in our past;
iii. embody the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction; or
iv. have yielded, or may be likely to
yield, information important in
prehistory or history.
Navy vessels that meet one or more of
these criteria, and that continue to
possess integrity of (as appropriate)
design, materials, workmanship, feeling
and/or association are eligible for listing
in the NRHP.
Recognizing that vessels have a
limited useful life of typically less than
fifty years, the Navy has determined
that, for Section 106 and Section 110
purposes, vessels possessing any of the
following characteristics at any time,
including during active service, are of
exceptional importance and meet the
listing eligibility criteria established by
the NPS and codified at 36 CFR 60.4:
i. The vessel was awarded an
individual Presidential Unit Citation. (A
Presidential Unit Citation is awarded to
military units that have performed an
extremely meritorious or heroic act,
usually in the face of an armed enemy.)
ii. An individual act of heroism took
place aboard the vessel such that an
individual was subsequently awarded
the Medal of Honor or the Navy Cross.
(The Medal of Honor is awarded for
valor in action against an enemy force.
The Navy Cross is awarded for
extraordinary heroism in action not
justifying an award of the Medal of
Honor.)
iii. A President of the United States
was assigned to the vessel during his or
her naval service.
iv. The vessel was the first to
incorporate engineering, weapons
systems, or other upgrades that
represent a revolutionary change in
naval design or warfighting capabilities,
or other special and unique
considerations.
v. Some other historic or socially
significant event occurred on the vessel.
B. Process
Each year, qualified Navy historians
with knowledge about Navy vessels will
review each vessel in active service to
determine which, if any, possess any of
the characteristics described above, and
integrity, and therefore, will be
determined eligible for listing in the
NRHP.
Upon decommissioning, those vessels
that have not already been determined
eligible for listing in the NRHP will be
evaluated by qualified Navy historians
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
with knowledge about Navy vessels in
accordance with the listing eligibility
criteria established by the NPS,
including whether the vessels possess
integrity, and informed by the above,
and thus, prior to making any final
disposition decision with the potential
to adversely affect historic property.
Depending on the availability of
funds, the Navy may also develop typespecific context studies to determine
NRHP listing eligibility of classes of
vessels. Context studies shall be
consistent with the eligibility criteria
noted above and with the NPS
publications ‘‘How to Apply the
National Register Criteria for
Evaluation,’’ ‘‘How to Complete the
National Register Multiple Property
Documentation Form,’’ and ‘‘Nominating
Historic Vessels and Shipwrecks to the
National Register of Historic Places.’’
Vessels will be analyzed by class and
the appropriate historic preservation
stakeholders will be consulted on
appropriate application of the National
Register criteria. In the event that
context studies are developed, they will
be made available to the public in
accordance with Section IV of this
Program.
C. Participation by Historic Preservation
Stakeholder
The Navy encourages historic
preservation stakeholders, including but
not limited to the ACHP, the NPS, State
Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO),
the National Conference of State
Historic Preservation Officers
(NCSHPO), the National Trust for
Historic Preservation (National Trust),
and the public to participate in the
process for determining whether a
vessel meets the eligibility criteria for
listing in the NRHP. Through its
existing public outreach programs the
Navy will invite the public and historic
preservation stakeholders to provide
written comments and justification that
support determining a vessel eligible for
listing in the NRHP.
After the annual SDR, the Navy
provides a list of vessels planned to be
decommissioned over the next five
years in a Report to Congress on the
Annual Long-Range Plan for
Construction of Naval Vessels.
Subsequent to the release of the annual
report to Congress, the Navy will
provide statements of eligibility or
ineligibility for listing in the NRHP to
the NCSHPO, as well as place them on
its Web site for those vessels to be
decommissioned in the forthcoming
year. The Navy will then solicit written
comments on those statements of
eligibility or ineligibility for listing in
the NRHP from historic preservation
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12247
stakeholders via its Web site. Historic
preservation stakeholders will have
sixty days from the time of publication
of the list of vessels to be
decommissioned to provide their
comments. The Navy will notify historic
preservation stakeholders, including the
Historic Naval Ships Association
(HNSA) and other Veterans affiliated
organizations, of the beginning of the
sixty-day period. All written comments
should be mailed to the Naval History
and Heritage Command (NHHC) or
submitted electronically via the NHHC’s
Web site. The Navy will consider all
written comments received before
making a final determination as to
whether a vessel is eligible for listing in
the NRHP. If the Navy determines no
question exists as to whether a vessel is
eligible for listing in the NRHP, then the
Navy will publish its final
determination of listing eligibility for
each vessel on its Web site. If the Navy
determines that a question exists as to
whether a vessel is eligible for listing in
the NRHP, or if the ACHP or the
Secretary of the Interior so request, the
Navy will seek a formal determination
of eligibility from the Keeper. Upon
review, the Keeper’s determination of
listing eligibility shall be final.
An historic preservation stakeholder
may also comment on a vessel’s
eligibility or ineligibility for listing in
the NRHP in writing while the vessel is
in active service. These comments
should be mailed to the NHHC or
submitted electronically via the NHHC’s
Web site. The NHHC will acknowledge
receipt of the comments in writing, and
retain the comments for consideration
when preparing the statement of
eligibility or ineligibility for the vessel
prior to the vessel’s scheduled
decommissioning.
D. Effect of Eligibility Determination on
Active Vessels
A determination that a vessel in active
service is eligible for listing in the
NRHP shall not affect the vessel’s
availability for routine operations,
combat operations, and modernization
to keep the vessel battle-worthy, safe,
and habitable, as required by the Navy’s
military mission. Specifically, the Navy
shall employ, deploy, activate,
inactivate, repair, modify, move and
decommission such vessels without
regard to their eligibility and without
needing to consider effects to them
under Section 106 of the NHPA.
IV. Treatment of Vessels Determined To
Be Eligible for Listing in the NRHP
The Navy will take the following
steps regarding vessels determined to be
eligible for listing in the NRHP during
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
12248
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Notices
active service or upon
decommissioning:
i. Annotate the vessel’s entry in the
NVR to reflect listing eligibility and
include the basis for eligibility (the
public can access the NVR at https://
www.nvr.navy.mil); and
ii. Make available a documentation
package consisting of historically
significant records such as command
operation reports, war diaries, and deck
logs, as they are submitted (the public
would be able to access the
documentation package at the NHHC;
unclassified command operation reports
will be available at https://
www.history.navy.mil).
The Navy will also strongly consider
making the vessel available for donation
only upon decommissioning and
striking from the NVR pursuant to 10
U.S.C. 7306 for up to two years unless:
i. The vessel is designated for Foreign
Military sales (FMS) transfer;
ii. There are other Navy requirements
for its continued use;
iii. The material condition of the
vessel precludes donation;
iv. National security or other
restrictions preclude donation; or
v. The vessel is nuclear powered.
(Additional coordination with the
Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion
Program is required to determine
donation feasibility.)
The Navy’s Ship Donation Program is
described at https://
peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/.
Donation application requirements
include submission of acceptable
curatorial/museum and maintenance
plans among other plans for the
preservation of the vessel in a condition
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.
If a qualified donee is not identified
within two years, the Navy may remove
the vessel from donation hold status and
proceed with another method of final
disposition. Contracts between the Navy
and qualified donees include provisions
that address the historic preservation of
the vessel. As part of its Section 106
responsibilities, the Navy provides these
contractual provisions to each
appropriate SHPO for comment before
finalizing the contract.
The Navy will publish a list of vessels
available for donation in the Federal
Register and at https://
peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/. The
list will include any NRHP eligible
vessel initially precluded from donation
that, due to a change in status, becomes
available for donation.
The Navy will take the following
steps regarding decommissioned vessels
determined eligible for listing in the
NRHP before final disposition by a
method other than donation:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
i. Give priority to compiling histories
of these eligible vessels when preparing
entries in the Dictionary of American
Naval Fighting Ships;
ii. Retain and, depending on
classification, provide public access to
historical documentation from NRHP
eligible vessels such as command
operation reports, war diaries, and ship
deck logs at the NHHC (deck logs that
are more than thirty years old are
transferred to the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA) for
permanent retention);
iii. In addition to the standard curator
items removed from the vessel upon
decommissioning in accordance with
required Navy policy, including
citations, correspondence of significant
historical value, ship histories,
paintings, ship silver services, and
photographs selected to best display the
physical characteristics of the vessel,
the Navy would make the vessel
available to the Navy Curator and
eligible non-profit organizations for
removal of additional equipment, parts
of the vessel, etc. that contribute to the
historical significance of the vessel.
Items removed by the Navy Curator will
be maintained and considered for loan
to qualified U.S. non-profit
organizations in accordance with 10
U.S.C. 2572, 4575; and
iv. Within three years of designating
a NRHP-eligible vessel for final
disposition, deposit with the NARA
documentation consisting of archivally
stable media of the following items:
a. A Booklet of General Plans; and
b. The last report of the Board of
Inspection and Survey describing the
material condition of the vessel.
Note that accessibility to the public
will depend on the document’s
classification and NARZ’ policies.
V. Reports
The Navy will submit an annual
report to the NCSHPQ and the ACHP on
the progress of this Program Comment
on 1 December, annually. The report
will include the following information:
i. The names and status of active
vessels identified as eligible for listing
in the NRHP, and the basis for their
eligibility;
ii. The names and status of
decommissioned vessels identified as
eligible for listing in the NRHP, and a
copy of the statement of eligibility;
iii. The names and status of
decommissioned vessels identified as
ineligible for listing in the NRHP, and
a copy of the statement of ineligibility;
and
iv. The names of the vessels eligible
for listing in the NRHP whose final
disposition occurred during the
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reporting period, along with the status
of the documentation supporting final
disposition.
The annual report will also be made
available to the public on the Navy’s
donation Web site.
VI. Effect of the Program Comment
By following this Program Comment,
the Navy will meet its responsibilities
for compliance with Section 110, in
part, and Section 106 of the NHPA
concerning the evaluation of vessels for
eligibility for listing in the NRHP and
the final disposition of eligible vessels.
Accordingly, the Navy will no longer be
required to follow the standard Section
106 process for each final disposition
decision affecting inactive vessels,
except as provided in this Program
Comment.
Vessels already determined eligible
for listing in the NRHP that are not
subject to an existing agreement
established through the Section 106
consultation process will be subject to
this Program Comment as if their
eligibility had been established as a
result of this Program Comment. Vessels
that are the subject of an existing
agreement established pursuant to the
Section 106 regulations will continue to
be subject to that existing agreement.
The Program Comment described
herein will remain in effect for twenty
years, unless and until the Navy decides
to terminate its application or the ACHP
‘‘determines that the consideration of
historic [vessels] is not being carried out
in a manner consistent with the program
comment’’ and withdraws the comment.
(36 CFR 800.14(e)(6).) Upon either
event, the Navy shall comply with the
requirements of 36 CFR part 800 for
each undertaking within the scope of
this Program Comment. The Navy shall
inform historic preservation
stakeholders of the Program Comment’s
termination.
The Navy shall reexamine the
Program Comment’s effectiveness after
the first year of implementation and
every five years thereafter within the
context of its annual report or by
convening a meeting with historic
preservation stakeholders. In
reexamining the Program Comment’s
effectiveness, the Navy shall consider
any written recommendations for
improvement submitted by historic
preservation stakeholders to the NHHC.
Once in effect, the Program Comment
may be amended when such an
amendment is agreed to in writing by
the Navy and the ACHP. The
amendment will be effective on the date
a copy of the amended Program
Comment signed by the Navy and the
ACHP is filed with the ACHP.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 49 / Monday, March 15, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix A—Definitions
a. Command Operation Report, formerly
Command History Report means a report that
covers the operational and administrative
actions of the command for each calendar
year and usually consists of a chronology, a
narrative, and enclosures. Some Command
Operation Reports are classified for a set
period of time.
b. Decommission means to remove a vessel
from active service.
c. Documentation package means a
compilation of historically significant records
including, but not limited to, command
operation reports, war diaries, and deck logs.
d. Effect means alteration to the
characteristics of a historic property
qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for
the National Register.
e. Historic Preservation Stakeholder means
the EQ–I?, t1ie NP, SHPOs, NCSHPO, the
National Trust, any other agency or
organization specifically concerned with
historic preservation issues, and the public.
f. Naval Vessel Register means the official
inventory of ships and service craft titled to
or in the custody of the U.S. Navy. It includes
information about vessels from the time of
their authorization through their life cycle
and final disposition.
g. Ship deck log means a daily chronology
of particular events for administrative and
legal purposes, as set forth by the Office of
the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction
3100.7 series.
h. Ship disposition review means an annual
review of vessels in active service conducted
by the Chief of Naval Operations to
determine which vessels will be
decommissioned from active service and
retained for potential reactivation or stricken
from the Naval Vessel Register and
designated for disposal.
i. Stricken vessel means a decommissioned
vessel that has been removed from the Naval
Vessel Register.
j. Undertaking means a project, activity, or
program funded in whole or in part under the
direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal
agency, including those carried out by or on
behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out
with Federal financial assistance; and those
requiring a Federal permit, license or
approval.
k. Vessel means the floating ships and
service craft built by and for the Navy, used
in furthering the Navy’s military mission,
and listed in the Naval Vessel Register.
Vessel does not include shipwrecks or those
vessels retained in Navy custody for public
display (i.e., USS CONSTITUTION,
NAUTILUS (SSN 571), ex-BARRY (DD 933)).
1. War diary means a ship’s recounting of
wartime operations. Some war diaries are
written in a cursory fashion. Others are
works of literary art. War diaries for combat
actions are included with the Command
Operations Report.
Authority: 36 CFR 800.14(e)
Dated: March 8, 2010.
John M. Fowler,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–5373 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–K6–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:34 Mar 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Form I–134, Extension of an
Existing Information Collection;
Comment Request
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Form I–134,
Affidavit of Support; OMB Control No.
1615–0014.
The Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has
submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register on November 12, 2009, at 74
FR 58302 allowing for a 60-day public
comment period. USCIS did not receive
any comments for this information
collection.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
an additional 30 days for public
comments. Comments are encouraged
and will be accepted until April 14,
2010. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the item(s) contained in this
notice, especially regarding the
estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), and to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer.
Comments may be submitted to: USCIS,
Chief, Regulatory Products Division,
Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts
Avenue, Washington, DC 20529–2210.
Comments may also be submitted to
DHS via facsimile to 202–272–8352 or
via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB
USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202–
395–5806 or via e-mail at
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
When submitting comments by e-mail
please make sure to add OMB Control
Number 1615–0014. Written comments
and suggestions from the public and
affected agencies should address one or
more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
12249
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques, or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
information collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Affidavit of Support.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: Form I–134.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals and
households. This information collection
is necessary to determine if at the time
of application into the United States, the
applicant is likely to become a public
charge.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 44,000 responses at 90 minutes
(1.5 hours) per response.
(5) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 66,000 annual burden hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument, please visit the
Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov.
We may also be contacted at: USCIS,
Regulatory Products Division, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2210;
Telephone 202–272–8377.
Dated: March 9, 2010.
Stephen Tarragon,
Deputy Chief, Regulatory Products Division,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010–5506 Filed 3–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 49 (Monday, March 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12245-12249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5373]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Program Comment for the Department of the Navy for the
Disposition of Historic Vessels
AGENCY: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of Program Comments for the Department of
the Navy for the Disposition of Historic Vessels.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has issued a
Program Comment for the Department of the Navy setting forth the way in
which it will comply with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act with regard to the determination of National Register
of Historic Places eligibility of its vessels and the treatment of
adverse effects that may result from their disposition.
DATES: The Program Comment was issued, and went into effect, on March
5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address any questions concerning this Program Comment to Dr.
Tom McCulloch, Office of Federal Agency Programs, Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 803,
Washington, DC 20004. Fax (202) 606-8647. You may address questions
through electronic mail to: tmcculloch@achp.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Tom McCulloch, (202) 606-8554,
tmcculloch@achp.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of
their undertakings on historic properties and to provide the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to
comment with regard to such undertakings. The ACHP has issued the
regulations that set forth the process through which Federal agencies
comply with these duties. Those regulations are codified under 36 CFR
part 800 (Section 106 regulations)
Under Section 800.14(e) of those regulations, agencies can request
the ACHP to provide a ``Program Comment'' on a particular category of
undertakings in lieu of conducting individual reviews of each
individual undertaking under such category, as set forth in 36 CFR
800.4 through 800.7. An agency can meet its Section 106
responsibilities with regard to the effects of particular aspects of
those undertakings by taking into account ACHP's Program Comment
[[Page 12246]]
and following the steps set forth in that comment.
I. Background
On March 5, 2010, the ACHP issued a Program Comment to the
Department of the Navy (Navy) that sets forth the way in which it will
comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act with
regard to the determination of National Register of Historic Places
(National Register) eligibility of its vessels and the treatment of
adverse effects that may result from their disposition.
On January 22, 2010 the ACHP published in the Federal Register its
``Notice of Intent to Issue Program Comments for the Department of the
Navy for the Disposition of Historic Vessels.'' Please refer to that
notice for additional background on the Program Comment (75 FR 3746-
3750).
The ACHP also notified via e-mail State and Tribal Historic
Preservation Officers, Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations,
and other preservation partners of its intent and provided them with
the Federal Register notice.
A total of 6 comments were received by the end of the comment
period on February 12. Most of the comments centered on the need to
keep the SHPOs better informed regarding the Navy's statements of
eligibility or noneligibility of the vessels to be decommissioned in
the following year and when the Navy would strike those historic
vessels from the Naval Vessel Register and dispose of them.
Other comments asked for clarification of various issues, such as
whether the applicability of the program comment is limited to floating
vessels (it is) and whether the program comment would preclude the
disposition of vessels for recycling (it does not).
After the close of the comment period, the ACHP staff met with
their Navy counterparts to address the comments and make edits as
appropriate. The issued version of the Program Comment, reproduced
below, reflects such edits.
II. Final Text of the Program Comment
The following is the text of issued Program Comment:
Program Comment Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.14(e) Implementing Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for the Evaluation of
Vessels for Eligibility for Listing in the National Register of
Historic Places and the Treatment of Eligible Vessels to Resolve
Adverse Effects that May Result from Certain Methods of Final
Disposition
I. Introduction
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHP)
requires Federal agencies to ``take into account the effect of [ an]
undertaking on any * * * structure * * * eligible for inclusion in the
National Register'' and to ``afford the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation * * * a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to
such undertaking.'' Regulations promulgated by the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP) and codified at 36 CFR Part 800 describe
the procedures Federal agencies must follow to meet their Section 106
obligations. Under 36 CFR 800.14, the ACHP provides Federal agencies
with ``a variety of alternative methods * * * to meet their Section 106
obligations,'' thereby allowing agencies ``to tailor the Section 106
process to their needs.'' (65 FR 77698-01)
The following Program Comment was proposed by the Navy, and issued
by the ACHP on (date to be determined), pursuant to 36 CFR 800.14(e).
The Program Comment benefits the Navy and the historic preservation
stakeholders by providing the Navy with a process for evaluating
floating vessels to determine eligibility for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) for Section 106 and Section 110
purposes. The Program Comment also provides a Section 106 method of
treatment of eligible vessels to resolve adverse effects that result
from certain methods of final disposition. The Program Comment will
enable Navy decision-makers to apply the eligibility criteria as
defined by the National Park Service (NPS) at 36 CFR Part 60 to vessels
in active service and decommissioned vessels. Furthermore, the Program
Comment will give the public and various historic preservation
stakeholders opportunities to provide input regarding a vessel's
eligibility for listing in the NRHP. The Program Comment will establish
a type of treatment (i.e., collecting documentation in accordance with
Section IV of this Program) that will begin immediately from the time a
vessel is determined eligible, and thus, well before a Navy decision to
dispose of the vessel. Finally, the Program Comment will clarify that
the Navy will not need to conduct Section 106 reviews regarding effects
to active vessels.
By implementing the Program Comment, the Navy will no longer be
required to follow the standard Section 106 process for each final
disposition decision affecting inactive vessels. In addition to
satisfying the Navy's obligations under Section 106 of the NHPA for
vessels, the Program Comment enables the Navy to fulfill its
responsibility under Section 110 of the NHPA to manage and maintain
vessels that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP in a way that
considers the preservation of their historic value.
II. Background
Naval vessels are the ships and service craft built by and for the
Navy, used in furthering the Navy's military mission, and listed in the
Naval Vessel Register (NVR). Naval vessels are an unusual type of
historic property. They are mobile assets that are put into harm's way
and remain in active service for typically less than fifty years.
Because naval vessels have a limited useful life, the Chief of Naval
Operations undertakes a Ship Disposition Review (SDR) each year to
determine whether any vessels should be decommissioned from active
service. The total number of vessels to be decommissioned varies from
year to year, but currently averages eight per year.
Upon the decommissioning of a vessel, the Secretary of the Navy is
authorized, under 10 U.S.C. 7304, to strike the vessel from the NVR. By
the authority of the Secretary of the Navy under 10 U.S.C. 5 7305-7307,
stricken Navy vessels may be: (1) Sold; (2) dismantled; (3)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State, Commonwealth, or
possession of the U.S., the District of Columbia, or non-profit entity;
(4) used for experimental purposes, including Navy sink exercises
(SINKEXes); (5) transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State,
Commonwealth or possession of the U.S. for use as an artificial reef;
or (6) disposed to a foreign nation by sale, lease, grant, loan,
barter, transfer or otherwise. These six methods of final disposition,
which are ``undertakings'' as defined by 36 CFR 800.16(y), are
available to the Navy because it is neither cost effective nor
consistent with the Navy's mission to retain vessels that have
surpassed their useful life.
III. Determining Eligibility for Listing in the NRHP
A. Criteria
The Secretary of the Interior, through the NPS, established four
criteria pursuant to its authority under the NHPA for determining
whether property is eligible for listing in the NRHP. The four
evaluation criteria are codified at 36 CFR 60.4 and listed below. The
Navy is required to evaluate vessels for eligibility for listing in the
NRHP using the four evaluation criteria:
[[Page 12247]]
i. Are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history;
ii. are associated with the lives of persons significant in our
past;
iii. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction; or
iv. have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important
in prehistory or history.
Navy vessels that meet one or more of these criteria, and that
continue to possess integrity of (as appropriate) design, materials,
workmanship, feeling and/or association are eligible for listing in the
NRHP.
Recognizing that vessels have a limited useful life of typically
less than fifty years, the Navy has determined that, for Section 106
and Section 110 purposes, vessels possessing any of the following
characteristics at any time, including during active service, are of
exceptional importance and meet the listing eligibility criteria
established by the NPS and codified at 36 CFR 60.4:
i. The vessel was awarded an individual Presidential Unit Citation.
(A Presidential Unit Citation is awarded to military units that have
performed an extremely meritorious or heroic act, usually in the face
of an armed enemy.)
ii. An individual act of heroism took place aboard the vessel such
that an individual was subsequently awarded the Medal of Honor or the
Navy Cross. (The Medal of Honor is awarded for valor in action against
an enemy force. The Navy Cross is awarded for extraordinary heroism in
action not justifying an award of the Medal of Honor.)
iii. A President of the United States was assigned to the vessel
during his or her naval service.
iv. The vessel was the first to incorporate engineering, weapons
systems, or other upgrades that represent a revolutionary change in
naval design or warfighting capabilities, or other special and unique
considerations.
v. Some other historic or socially significant event occurred on
the vessel.
B. Process
Each year, qualified Navy historians with knowledge about Navy
vessels will review each vessel in active service to determine which,
if any, possess any of the characteristics described above, and
integrity, and therefore, will be determined eligible for listing in
the NRHP.
Upon decommissioning, those vessels that have not already been
determined eligible for listing in the NRHP will be evaluated by
qualified Navy historians with knowledge about Navy vessels in
accordance with the listing eligibility criteria established by the
NPS, including whether the vessels possess integrity, and informed by
the above, and thus, prior to making any final disposition decision
with the potential to adversely affect historic property.
Depending on the availability of funds, the Navy may also develop
type-specific context studies to determine NRHP listing eligibility of
classes of vessels. Context studies shall be consistent with the
eligibility criteria noted above and with the NPS publications ``How to
Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,'' ``How to
Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form,''
and ``Nominating Historic Vessels and Shipwrecks to the National
Register of Historic Places.'' Vessels will be analyzed by class and
the appropriate historic preservation stakeholders will be consulted on
appropriate application of the National Register criteria. In the event
that context studies are developed, they will be made available to the
public in accordance with Section IV of this Program.
C. Participation by Historic Preservation Stakeholder
The Navy encourages historic preservation stakeholders, including
but not limited to the ACHP, the NPS, State Historic Preservation
Officers (SHPO), the National Conference of State Historic Preservation
Officers (NCSHPO), the National Trust for Historic Preservation
(National Trust), and the public to participate in the process for
determining whether a vessel meets the eligibility criteria for listing
in the NRHP. Through its existing public outreach programs the Navy
will invite the public and historic preservation stakeholders to
provide written comments and justification that support determining a
vessel eligible for listing in the NRHP.
After the annual SDR, the Navy provides a list of vessels planned
to be decommissioned over the next five years in a Report to Congress
on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels.
Subsequent to the release of the annual report to Congress, the Navy
will provide statements of eligibility or ineligibility for listing in
the NRHP to the NCSHPO, as well as place them on its Web site for those
vessels to be decommissioned in the forthcoming year. The Navy will
then solicit written comments on those statements of eligibility or
ineligibility for listing in the NRHP from historic preservation
stakeholders via its Web site. Historic preservation stakeholders will
have sixty days from the time of publication of the list of vessels to
be decommissioned to provide their comments. The Navy will notify
historic preservation stakeholders, including the Historic Naval Ships
Association (HNSA) and other Veterans affiliated organizations, of the
beginning of the sixty-day period. All written comments should be
mailed to the Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC) or submitted
electronically via the NHHC's Web site. The Navy will consider all
written comments received before making a final determination as to
whether a vessel is eligible for listing in the NRHP. If the Navy
determines no question exists as to whether a vessel is eligible for
listing in the NRHP, then the Navy will publish its final determination
of listing eligibility for each vessel on its Web site. If the Navy
determines that a question exists as to whether a vessel is eligible
for listing in the NRHP, or if the ACHP or the Secretary of the
Interior so request, the Navy will seek a formal determination of
eligibility from the Keeper. Upon review, the Keeper's determination of
listing eligibility shall be final.
An historic preservation stakeholder may also comment on a vessel's
eligibility or ineligibility for listing in the NRHP in writing while
the vessel is in active service. These comments should be mailed to the
NHHC or submitted electronically via the NHHC's Web site. The NHHC will
acknowledge receipt of the comments in writing, and retain the comments
for consideration when preparing the statement of eligibility or
ineligibility for the vessel prior to the vessel's scheduled
decommissioning.
D. Effect of Eligibility Determination on Active Vessels
A determination that a vessel in active service is eligible for
listing in the NRHP shall not affect the vessel's availability for
routine operations, combat operations, and modernization to keep the
vessel battle-worthy, safe, and habitable, as required by the Navy's
military mission. Specifically, the Navy shall employ, deploy,
activate, inactivate, repair, modify, move and decommission such
vessels without regard to their eligibility and without needing to
consider effects to them under Section 106 of the NHPA.
IV. Treatment of Vessels Determined To Be Eligible for Listing in the
NRHP
The Navy will take the following steps regarding vessels determined
to be eligible for listing in the NRHP during
[[Page 12248]]
active service or upon decommissioning:
i. Annotate the vessel's entry in the NVR to reflect listing
eligibility and include the basis for eligibility (the public can
access the NVR at https://www.nvr.navy.mil); and
ii. Make available a documentation package consisting of
historically significant records such as command operation reports, war
diaries, and deck logs, as they are submitted (the public would be able
to access the documentation package at the NHHC; unclassified command
operation reports will be available at https://www.history.navy.mil).
The Navy will also strongly consider making the vessel available
for donation only upon decommissioning and striking from the NVR
pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 7306 for up to two years unless:
i. The vessel is designated for Foreign Military sales (FMS)
transfer;
ii. There are other Navy requirements for its continued use;
iii. The material condition of the vessel precludes donation;
iv. National security or other restrictions preclude donation; or
v. The vessel is nuclear powered. (Additional coordination with the
Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is required to determine
donation feasibility.)
The Navy's Ship Donation Program is described at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/. Donation application requirements
include submission of acceptable curatorial/museum and maintenance
plans among other plans for the preservation of the vessel in a
condition satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. If a qualified
donee is not identified within two years, the Navy may remove the
vessel from donation hold status and proceed with another method of
final disposition. Contracts between the Navy and qualified donees
include provisions that address the historic preservation of the
vessel. As part of its Section 106 responsibilities, the Navy provides
these contractual provisions to each appropriate SHPO for comment
before finalizing the contract.
The Navy will publish a list of vessels available for donation in
the Federal Register and at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/.
The list will include any NRHP eligible vessel initially precluded from
donation that, due to a change in status, becomes available for
donation.
The Navy will take the following steps regarding decommissioned
vessels determined eligible for listing in the NRHP before final
disposition by a method other than donation:
i. Give priority to compiling histories of these eligible vessels
when preparing entries in the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting
Ships;
ii. Retain and, depending on classification, provide public access
to historical documentation from NRHP eligible vessels such as command
operation reports, war diaries, and ship deck logs at the NHHC (deck
logs that are more than thirty years old are transferred to the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for permanent
retention);
iii. In addition to the standard curator items removed from the
vessel upon decommissioning in accordance with required Navy policy,
including citations, correspondence of significant historical value,
ship histories, paintings, ship silver services, and photographs
selected to best display the physical characteristics of the vessel,
the Navy would make the vessel available to the Navy Curator and
eligible non-profit organizations for removal of additional equipment,
parts of the vessel, etc. that contribute to the historical
significance of the vessel. Items removed by the Navy Curator will be
maintained and considered for loan to qualified U.S. non-profit
organizations in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2572, 4575; and
iv. Within three years of designating a NRHP-eligible vessel for
final disposition, deposit with the NARA documentation consisting of
archivally stable media of the following items:
a. A Booklet of General Plans; and
b. The last report of the Board of Inspection and Survey describing
the material condition of the vessel.
Note that accessibility to the public will depend on the document's
classification and NARZ' policies.
V. Reports
The Navy will submit an annual report to the NCSHPQ and the ACHP on
the progress of this Program Comment on 1 December, annually. The
report will include the following information:
i. The names and status of active vessels identified as eligible
for listing in the NRHP, and the basis for their eligibility;
ii. The names and status of decommissioned vessels identified as
eligible for listing in the NRHP, and a copy of the statement of
eligibility;
iii. The names and status of decommissioned vessels identified as
ineligible for listing in the NRHP, and a copy of the statement of
ineligibility; and
iv. The names of the vessels eligible for listing in the NRHP whose
final disposition occurred during the reporting period, along with the
status of the documentation supporting final disposition.
The annual report will also be made available to the public on the
Navy's donation Web site.
VI. Effect of the Program Comment
By following this Program Comment, the Navy will meet its
responsibilities for compliance with Section 110, in part, and Section
106 of the NHPA concerning the evaluation of vessels for eligibility
for listing in the NRHP and the final disposition of eligible vessels.
Accordingly, the Navy will no longer be required to follow the standard
Section 106 process for each final disposition decision affecting
inactive vessels, except as provided in this Program Comment.
Vessels already determined eligible for listing in the NRHP that
are not subject to an existing agreement established through the
Section 106 consultation process will be subject to this Program
Comment as if their eligibility had been established as a result of
this Program Comment. Vessels that are the subject of an existing
agreement established pursuant to the Section 106 regulations will
continue to be subject to that existing agreement.
The Program Comment described herein will remain in effect for
twenty years, unless and until the Navy decides to terminate its
application or the ACHP ``determines that the consideration of historic
[vessels] is not being carried out in a manner consistent with the
program comment'' and withdraws the comment. (36 CFR 800.14(e)(6).)
Upon either event, the Navy shall comply with the requirements of 36
CFR part 800 for each undertaking within the scope of this Program
Comment. The Navy shall inform historic preservation stakeholders of
the Program Comment's termination.
The Navy shall reexamine the Program Comment's effectiveness after
the first year of implementation and every five years thereafter within
the context of its annual report or by convening a meeting with
historic preservation stakeholders. In reexamining the Program
Comment's effectiveness, the Navy shall consider any written
recommendations for improvement submitted by historic preservation
stakeholders to the NHHC. Once in effect, the Program Comment may be
amended when such an amendment is agreed to in writing by the Navy and
the ACHP. The amendment will be effective on the date a copy of the
amended Program Comment signed by the Navy and the ACHP is filed with
the ACHP.
[[Page 12249]]
Appendix A--Definitions
a. Command Operation Report, formerly Command History Report
means a report that covers the operational and administrative
actions of the command for each calendar year and usually consists
of a chronology, a narrative, and enclosures. Some Command Operation
Reports are classified for a set period of time.
b. Decommission means to remove a vessel from active service.
c. Documentation package means a compilation of historically
significant records including, but not limited to, command operation
reports, war diaries, and deck logs.
d. Effect means alteration to the characteristics of a historic
property qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for the
National Register.
e. Historic Preservation Stakeholder means the EQ-I?, t1ie NP,
SHPOs, NCSHPO, the National Trust, any other agency or organization
specifically concerned with historic preservation issues, and the
public.
f. Naval Vessel Register means the official inventory of ships
and service craft titled to or in the custody of the U.S. Navy. It
includes information about vessels from the time of their
authorization through their life cycle and final disposition.
g. Ship deck log means a daily chronology of particular events
for administrative and legal purposes, as set forth by the Office of
the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 3100.7 series.
h. Ship disposition review means an annual review of vessels in
active service conducted by the Chief of Naval Operations to
determine which vessels will be decommissioned from active service
and retained for potential reactivation or stricken from the Naval
Vessel Register and designated for disposal.
i. Stricken vessel means a decommissioned vessel that has been
removed from the Naval Vessel Register.
j. Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in
whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a
Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a
Federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance;
and those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval.
k. Vessel means the floating ships and service craft built by
and for the Navy, used in furthering the Navy's military mission,
and listed in the Naval Vessel Register. Vessel does not include
shipwrecks or those vessels retained in Navy custody for public
display (i.e., USS CONSTITUTION, NAUTILUS (SSN 571), ex-BARRY (DD
933)).
1. War diary means a ship's recounting of wartime operations.
Some war diaries are written in a cursory fashion. Others are works
of literary art. War diaries for combat actions are included with
the Command Operations Report.
Authority: 36 CFR 800.14(e)
Dated: March 8, 2010.
John M. Fowler,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-5373 Filed 3-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-K6-M