Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing Choice Voucher Program and Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Fiscal Year 2010; Revised, 11553-11554 [2010-5168]

Download as PDF 11553 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES functions. Passengers are invited, though not required, to complete and return the survey via pre-paid postage, which is prefixed to the survey, or passengers may submit their responses via an online portal. The intercept methodology randomly selects passengers to complete the survey in an effort to gain survey data representative of all passenger demographics— including passengers who— • Travel on weekdays or weekends; • Those who travel in the morning, mid-day, or evening; • Those who pass through each of the different security screening locations in the airport; • Those who are subject to more intensive screening of their baggage or person; and • Those who experience different volume conditions and wait times as they proceed through the security checkpoints. The survey includes ten to fifteen questions. Each question promotes a quality response so that TSA can identify areas in need of improvement. All questions concern aspects of the passenger’s security screening experience. TSA intends to collect this information in order to continue to assess customer satisfaction in an effort to more efficiently manage airport performance. In its future surveys, the TSA wishes to obtain more detailed, airport-specific data that the TSA can use to enhance customer experiences and airport performances. In order to gain more detailed information regarding customer experiences, the TSA is submitting eighty-one questions to OMB for approval. Twenty-eight of the questions have been previously approved by OMB and fifty-three questions are being submitted to the OMB for first-time approval. Each survey question seeks to gain information regarding one of the following categories: • Confidence in Personnel • Confidence in Screening Equipment • Confidence in Security Procedures • Convenience of Divesting • Experience at Checkpoint • Satisfaction with Wait Time • Separation from Belongings • Separation from Others in Party • Stress Level TSA personnel select passengers using a random method to voluntarily participate in the survey until the TSA obtains the desired sample size. The samples can be selected with one randomly selected time and location or span multiple times and location. Each airport may choose one or more of the following sample methods, which include a business card that directs customers to an online portal, a customer satisfaction card with survey questions on the card, or a customer satisfaction card with survey questions on the card and a link to the online portal. All responses are voluntary and there is no burden on passengers who choose not to respond. TSA at airports have the capability to conduct this survey. We estimate that TSA at 25 airports will conduct the survey each year. Based on prior survey data and research, the TSA assumes a maximum volume for the survey would be 1,000 surveys per airport. We assume the burden on passengers who choose to respond to be approximately five minutes per respondent. Therefore, 1,000 surveys × 25 airports = 25,000 respondents a year, the total burden is 25,000 × 5 = 125,000 minutes, or 2083.3 hours per year. Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on March 3, 2010. Joanna Johnson, TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of Information Technology. [FR Doc. 2010–5176 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–05–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5328–N–03] Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing Choice Voucher Program and Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Fiscal Year 2010; Revised Office of the Secretary, HUD. Notice of Final Fair Market Rents (FMRs) for Fiscal Year 2010, Update. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: This notice updates the FMRs for Reno-Sparks, NV, and Ward County, ND, based on Random Digit Dialing (RDD) surveys conducted in October and November 2009. DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information on the methodology used to develop FMRs or a listing of all FMRs, please call the HUD USER information line at (800) 245–2691 or access the information on the HUD Web site, http:// www.huduser.org/datasets/fmr.html. FMRs are listed at the 40th or 50th percentile in Schedule B. For informational purposes, a table of 40th percentile recent mover rents for those areas currently at the 50th percentile FMRs will be provided on the same website noted above. Any questions related to use of FMRs or voucher payment standards should be directed to the respective local HUD program staff. Questions on how to conduct FMR surveys or further methodological explanations may be addressed to Marie L. Lihn or Lynn A. Rodgers, Economic and Market Analysis Division, Office of Economic Affairs, Office of Policy Development and Research, telephone (202) 708–0590. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. (Other than the HUD USER information line and TTY numbers, telephone numbers are not toll-free.) As the result of comments submitted in response to HUD’s notice of proposed Fair Market Rents published on August 4, 2009 (74 FR 38716), HUD conducted Random Digit Dialing (RDD) surveys for the following FMR areas: Reno-Sparks, NV Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), and Ward County, ND. These RDD surveys began in October 2009 and were completed in November 2009. The RDD survey for Reno-Sparks, NV, indicated a significant decline in the FMR, while there was a significant increase indicated by the RDD survey for Ward County, ND. Both areas were having significant problems administering the Housing Choice Voucher program at the then current FY2009 FMRs, and anticipated continued difficulty under the proposed FY2010 FMRs. As a result, HUD is revising these FMRs as published on September 30, 2009 (74 FR 50552), effective immediately. The FMRs for the two affected areas are revised as follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FMR by Number of Bedrooms in Unit 2010 Fair Market Rent Area 0 BR Reno-Sparks, NV MSA ........................................................ Ward County, ND ................................................................. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:35 Mar 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 1 BR $577 $425 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 BR $690 $512 E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 3 BR $853 $631 11MRN1 $1,239 $872 4 BR $1,498 $1,035 11554 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices Dated: March 4, 2010 Raphael W. Bostic, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research. duties imposed on the Department of the Interior. Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior. [FR Doc. 2010–5168 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2010–5163 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Bureau of Reclamation Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group Charter Renewal; Notice of Charter Renewal AGENCY: ACTION: Interior. ACTION: Notice of renewal. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92–463). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior is renewing the charter for the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group (CAG). The purpose of the CAG is to provide recommendations to the Secretary of the Interior and the State of Washington on the structure and implementation of the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program. In consultation with the State, the Yakama Nation, Yakima River basin irrigators, and other interested and related parties, six members are appointed to serve on the CAG. The basin conservation program is structured to provide economic incentives with cooperative Federal, State, and local funding to stimulate the identification and implementation of structural and nonstructural costeffective water conservation measures in the Yakima River basin. Improvements in the efficiency of water delivery and use will result in improved streamflows for fish and wildlife and improve the reliability of water supplies for irrigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dawn Wiedmeier, Deputy Area Manager, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Program, telephone 509– 575–5848, extension 213. Certification I hereby certify that Charter renewal of the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group is in the public interest in connection with the performance of VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:35 Mar 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 National Park Service, Interior. Notice. AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural items in the possession of the Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ, that meet the definitions of ‘‘sacred objects’’ and ‘‘objects of cultural patrimony’’ under 25 U.S.C. 3001. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service’s administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the cultural items. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. In January and September 2000, cultural items were gifted to the Museum of Northern Arizona by a private donor. The cultural items are Navajo sandpainting drawings and water color/pencil drawings, and are divided into three collections. The first collection was originally collected by an old trading post family in the area of Farmington, NM. The 29 cultural items are 4 watercolors of sacred Navajo Yei figures and deities; 22 water colors and/or pencil drawings depicting Navajo ceremonial sandpaintings from specific chants; and 3 pages of hand written notes describing the Feather Way and Big Star Way ceremonies. The second collection, by Ray Winnie, Lukachukai, AZ, circa 1920s, depicts a sacred Navajo ceremonial sandpainting. Mr. Winnie was a Singer of the Shooting Way ceremony. The one cultural item is a colored pencil drawing on brown paper. The third collection, by Ray Winnie, Lukachukai, AZ, circa 1920s, depicts sacred Navajo ceremonial sandpaintings. Mr. Winnie was a Singer of the Shooting Way ceremony. The six PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 cultural items consist of one notebook with pencil and crayon drawings, four color pencil drawings, and one muslin watercolor depicting Navajo ceremonies. A traditional practitioner of Navajo religious ceremonies determined the images presented were of sacred esoteric knowledge with specific ceremonial properties that continue to be used by traditional Navajo religious practitioners. Based on the sacred esoteric knowledge of the images, the paintings could not have been obtained voluntarily nor could they have been alienated by a single individual, and instead belong to the tribe as a whole. Officials of the Museum of Northern Arizona have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(C), the 36 cultural items described above are specific ceremonial objects needed by traditional Native American religious leaders for the practice of traditional Native American religions by their present-day adherents. Officials of the Museum of Northern Arizona also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(D), the 36 cultural items described above have ongoing historical, traditional, or cultural importance central to the Native American group or culture itself, rather than property owned by an individual. Lastly, officials of the Museum of Northern Arizona have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the sacred objects/objects of cultural patrimony and the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah. Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the sacred objects/objects of cultural patrimony should contact Elaine Hughes, NAGPRA Contact, Museum of Northern Arizona, 3101 N. Ft. Valley Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86004, telephone (928) 774–5211, ext. 270, before April 12, 2010. Repatriation of the sacred objects/objects of cultural patrimony to the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Museum of Northern Arizona is responsible for notifying the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah that this notice has been published. Dated: December 10, 2010 Richard C. Waldbauer, Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2010–5167 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–S E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM 11MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11553-11554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5168]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5328-N-03]


Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing Choice Voucher Program 
and Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Fiscal 
Year 2010; Revised

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of Final Fair Market Rents (FMRs) for Fiscal Year 2010, 
Update.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice updates the FMRs for Reno-Sparks, NV, and Ward 
County, ND, based on Random Digit Dialing (RDD) surveys conducted in 
October and November 2009.

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information on the 
methodology used to develop FMRs or a listing of all FMRs, please call 
the HUD USER information line at (800) 245-2691 or access the 
information on the HUD Web site, http://www.huduser.org/datasets/fmr.html. FMRs are listed at the 40th or 50th percentile in Schedule B. 
For informational purposes, a table of 40th percentile recent mover 
rents for those areas currently at the 50th percentile FMRs will be 
provided on the same website noted above. Any questions related to use 
of FMRs or voucher payment standards should be directed to the 
respective local HUD program staff. Questions on how to conduct FMR 
surveys or further methodological explanations may be addressed to 
Marie L. Lihn or Lynn A. Rodgers, Economic and Market Analysis 
Division, Office of Economic Affairs, Office of Policy Development and 
Research, telephone (202) 708-0590. Persons with hearing or speech 
impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free 
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. (Other than the 
HUD USER information line and TTY numbers, telephone numbers are not 
toll-free.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As the result of comments submitted in 
response to HUD's notice of proposed Fair Market Rents published on 
August 4, 2009 (74 FR 38716), HUD conducted Random Digit Dialing (RDD) 
surveys for the following FMR areas: Reno-Sparks, NV Metropolitan 
Statistical Area (MSA), and Ward County, ND. These RDD surveys began in 
October 2009 and were completed in November 2009. The RDD survey for 
Reno-Sparks, NV, indicated a significant decline in the FMR, while 
there was a significant increase indicated by the RDD survey for Ward 
County, ND. Both areas were having significant problems administering 
the Housing Choice Voucher program at the then current FY2009 FMRs, and 
anticipated continued difficulty under the proposed FY2010 FMRs. As a 
result, HUD is revising these FMRs as published on September 30, 2009 
(74 FR 50552), effective immediately.
    The FMRs for the two affected areas are revised as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         FMR by Number of Bedrooms in Unit
   2010 Fair Market Rent Area    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       0 BR            1 BR            2 BR            3 BR            4 BR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reno-Sparks, NV MSA.............            $577            $690            $853          $1,239          $1,498
Ward County, ND.................            $425            $512            $631            $872          $1,035
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 11554]]

    Dated: March 4, 2010
Raphael W. Bostic,
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-5168 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P