Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58 Airplanes, 11433-11435 [2010-5024]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington on March 4,
2010.
Suzanne Masterson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–5162 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1176; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–062–AD; Amendment
39–16226; AD 2010–06–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation Model G58
Airplanes
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
G58 airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting the installation of stand-off
hardware between the heater fuel line
and the heater over-temperature sensor
wires and also brake reservoir tubing
and the heater fuel pump wiring for
minimum clearance and installing
acceptable stand-off hardware if standoff hardware is missing or inadequate.
This AD results from reports received of
a power wire shorting out on the brake
reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct inadequate
clearance of the brake reservoir tubing
and the heater fuel pump wiring, which
could result in chafing and shorting out
of the electrical wiring and chafing of
the tubing carrying flammable fluids.
This condition could lead to a fire in the
nose wheel well.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
April 15, 2010.
On April 15, 2010, the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: To get the service
information identified in this AD,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Mar 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
contact Hawker Beechcraft Corporation,
P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201–
0085; telephone: 1 (800) 429–5372 or
(316) 676–3140; fax: (316) 676–3340;
Internet: https://
www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
To view the AD docket, go to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, or on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. The docket
number is FAA–2009–1176; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–062–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA Wichita Aircraft Certification
Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316)
946–4174; fax: (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On December 8, 2009, we issued a
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to
certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
Model G58 airplanes. This proposal was
published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
on December 17, 2009 (74 FR 66930).
The NPRM proposed to require
inspecting the installation of stand-off
hardware between the heater fuel line
and the heater over-temperature sensor
wires and also brake reservoir tubing
and the heater fuel pump wiring for
minimum clearance and installing
acceptable stand-off hardware if standoff hardware is missing or inadequate.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the
comments received on the proposal and
FAA’s response to each comment:
Comment Issue No. 1: Effective Date
Mr. Busby states we should make the
effective date of the AD immediate.
The FAA disagrees. We carefully
reviewed the data for this safety concern
to assess the risk level of this particular
event. After reviewing the data, we
compared this safety concern with
similar safety concerns in the past.
Then, we assigned a level of risk for this
particular event equivalent to the level
of risk assigned to the similar past safety
concerns we used for comparison. With
the information we have at this time, we
set the time frame to comply with the
actions for this AD similar to the time
frame that was set for similar safety
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11433
concerns that had equivalent risk levels.
Without additional information to
increase the risk level of this safety
concern we have determined that the
time frame set for complying with this
safety concern is in line with past
precedent.
We are not changing the final rule AD
action based on this comment.
Comment Issue No. 2: Work-Hours
Mr. Busby states that the work-hours
allotted to do the proposed inspection
are not enough. We infer the commenter
wants us to increase the work-hours to
do the proposed inspection to relieve
the pressure on mechanics.
The FAA disagrees. For this AD, we
derived the work-hours from the
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation service
information. Those work-hours were
used to calculate the estimated cost
impact on the owners/operators of the
affected airplanes. The FAA uses that
cost estimate in the economic analysis
to determine if the AD will have a
substantial impact on small entities. In
general, the direct cost to an operator is
the most significant economic
consideration of an AD. Since the workhours in the AD are estimates for
determining cost impact to the operator,
maintenance personnel may take more
or less time to do the inspection and/or
maintenance as is necessary for that
particular aircraft or task. Moderately
increasing the estimated work-hours for
the initial inspection does not
significantly increase the cost impact on
the operator.
We are not changing the final rule AD
action based on this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. We have
determined that these minor
corrections:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 71
airplanes in the U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to do
the inspection of the heater fuel line, the
heater over-temperature sensor wires,
the brake reservoir line, and the fuel
heater power wire:
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
11434
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Total cost per
airplane
Labor cost
Parts cost
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .......................................................
Not applicable ...............................
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary stand-off hardware
installation that would be required
based on the results of the inspection.
We have no way of determining the
$85
Parts cost
.5 work-hour × $85 per hour = $42.50 ....................................................................................................................
results of the inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of
$50
Parts cost
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 ......................................................................................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Mar 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD (and other
information as included in the
Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary by sending a request to us
at the address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2009–1176;
Directorate Identifier 2009–CE–062–AD’’
in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$92.50
$100
Total cost
per airplane
$610
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding a
new AD to read as follows:
■
2010–06–02 Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation: Amendment 39–16226;
Docket No. FAA–2009–1176; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–062–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on April 15,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model G58
airplanes, serial numbers TH–2125 through
TH–2172 and TH–2174 through TH–2220,
that are certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 32: Landing Gear.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports received
of a power wire shorting out on the brake
reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct inadequate clearance of
the brake reservoir tubing and the heater fuel
pump wiring, which could result in chafing
and shorting out of the electrical wiring and
chafing of the tubing carrying flammable
fluids. This condition could lead to a fire in
the nose wheel well.
Compliance
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Total cost
per airplane
airplanes that may need this
installation:
Labor cost
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation will
allow warranty credit as specified in
Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
$6,035
number of airplanes that may need this
installation:
Labor cost
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary replacement of the brake
line that would be required based on the
Total cost on
U.S. operators
(f) To address this problem, you must do
the following, unless already done:
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
11435
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) Inspect the installation of the stand-off hardware between the heater fuel line and heater
over-temperature sensor wires for minimum
clearance.
Within the next 50 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after April 15, 2010 (the effective date of
this AD) or within the next 12 months after
April 15, 2010 (the effective date of this
AD), whichever occurs first.
Before further flight after the inspection where
the missing stand-off hardware and/or inadequate clearance was found.
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
Within the next 50 hours TIS after April 15,
2010 (the effective date of this AD) or within the next 12 months after April 15, 2010
(the effective date of this AD), whichever
occurs first.
Before further flight after the inspection where
damaged tubing and/or wiring was found.
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
Within the next 50 hours TIS after April 15,
2010 (the effective date of this AD) or within the next 12 months after April 15, 2010
(the effective date of this AD), whichever
occurs first.
Before further flight after the inspection where
the missing stand-off hardware and/or inadequate clearance was found.
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information incorporated by reference
for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
(2) If, during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, the stand-off hardware is not installed or it does not maintain
the minimum clearance, install stand-off hardware as specified in the service information.
(3) Inspect the brake reservoir line and the fuel
heater power wire for damage.
(4) If, during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD, damage is found, repair or replace damaged tubing and/or wiring
found.
(5) Inspect the installation of the stand-off hardware between the brake reservoir line and
the fuel heater power wire for minimum clearance.
(6) If, during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, the stand-off hardware is not installed or it does not maintain
the minimum clearance, install stand-off hardware as specified in the service information.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Kevin
Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer, FAA
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone: (316) 946–4174; fax: (316)
946–4107. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
2, 2010.
Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–5024 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32–3898,
dated November 2008, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201–0085; telephone: 1 (800) 429–5372 or
(316) 676–3140; fax: (316) 676–3340;
Internet: https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference for
this AD at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the Central
Region, call (816) 329–3768.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Mar 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0993; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–089–AD; Amendment
39–16229; AD 2010–06–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203
Airplanes; and Model A300 B4–601,
B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R,
and B4–622R Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
One A300–600 aeroplane operator reported
that, during a routine inspection, the Right
Hand frame 40 forward fitting between
stringer 32 and stringer 33 was found
cracked. The subject aeroplane had
previously been modified in accordance with
Airbus SB A300–57–6053 (Airbus
Modification 10453).
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in a deterioration of the structural
integrity of the frame.
*
14 CFR Part 39
PO 00000
Follow Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 32–3898, dated November
2008.
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April
15, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of April 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11433-11435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5024]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD;
Amendment 39-16226; AD 2010-06-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58 airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting the installation of stand-off hardware between the heater
fuel line and the heater over-temperature sensor wires and also brake
reservoir tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring for minimum clearance
and installing acceptable stand-off hardware if stand-off hardware is
missing or inadequate. This AD results from reports received of a power
wire shorting out on the brake reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct inadequate clearance of the brake reservoir
tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring, which could result in chafing
and shorting out of the electrical wiring and chafing of the tubing
carrying flammable fluids. This condition could lead to a fire in the
nose wheel well.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on April 15, 2010.
On April 15, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
ADDRESSES: To get the service information identified in this AD,
contact Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201-0085; telephone: 1 (800) 429-5372 or (316) 676-3140; fax: (316)
676-3340; Internet: https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. The docket number is FAA-2009-1176;
Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4174; fax: (316) 946-4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On December 8, 2009, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that
would apply to certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model G58
airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on December 17, 2009 (74 FR
66930). The NPRM proposed to require inspecting the installation of
stand-off hardware between the heater fuel line and the heater over-
temperature sensor wires and also brake reservoir tubing and the heater
fuel pump wiring for minimum clearance and installing acceptable stand-
off hardware if stand-off hardware is missing or inadequate.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
and FAA's response to each comment:
Comment Issue No. 1: Effective Date
Mr. Busby states we should make the effective date of the AD
immediate.
The FAA disagrees. We carefully reviewed the data for this safety
concern to assess the risk level of this particular event. After
reviewing the data, we compared this safety concern with similar safety
concerns in the past. Then, we assigned a level of risk for this
particular event equivalent to the level of risk assigned to the
similar past safety concerns we used for comparison. With the
information we have at this time, we set the time frame to comply with
the actions for this AD similar to the time frame that was set for
similar safety concerns that had equivalent risk levels. Without
additional information to increase the risk level of this safety
concern we have determined that the time frame set for complying with
this safety concern is in line with past precedent.
We are not changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.
Comment Issue No. 2: Work-Hours
Mr. Busby states that the work-hours allotted to do the proposed
inspection are not enough. We infer the commenter wants us to increase
the work-hours to do the proposed inspection to relieve the pressure on
mechanics.
The FAA disagrees. For this AD, we derived the work-hours from the
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation service information. Those work-hours
were used to calculate the estimated cost impact on the owners/
operators of the affected airplanes. The FAA uses that cost estimate in
the economic analysis to determine if the AD will have a substantial
impact on small entities. In general, the direct cost to an operator is
the most significant economic consideration of an AD. Since the work-
hours in the AD are estimates for determining cost impact to the
operator, maintenance personnel may take more or less time to do the
inspection and/or maintenance as is necessary for that particular
aircraft or task. Moderately increasing the estimated work-hours for
the initial inspection does not significantly increase the cost impact
on the operator.
We are not changing the final rule AD action based on this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these
minor corrections:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 71 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to do the inspection of the heater
fuel line, the heater over-temperature sensor wires, the brake
reservoir line, and the fuel heater power wire:
[[Page 11434]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per Total cost on
Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85............ Not applicable................ $85 $6,035
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary stand-off
hardware installation that would be required based on the results of
the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes
that may need this installation:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.5 work-hour x $85 per hour = $42.50.... $50 $92.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement of
the brake line that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that
may need this installation:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost
Labor cost Parts cost per airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510...... $100 $610
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation will allow warranty credit as
specified in Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 32-3898,
dated November 2008.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD'' in your
request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2010-06-02 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation: Amendment 39-16226; Docket
No. FAA-2009-1176; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-062-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on April 15, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model G58 airplanes, serial numbers TH-
2125 through TH-2172 and TH-2174 through TH-2220, that are
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports received of a power wire
shorting out on the brake reservoir tube. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct inadequate clearance of the brake reservoir
tubing and the heater fuel pump wiring, which could result in
chafing and shorting out of the electrical wiring and chafing of the
tubing carrying flammable fluids. This condition could lead to a
fire in the nose wheel well.
Compliance
(f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:
[[Page 11435]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the installation Within the next 50 Follow Hawker
of the stand-off hardware hours time-in- Beechcraft
between the heater fuel service (TIS) after Mandatory Service
line and heater over- April 15, 2010 (the Bulletin SB 32-
temperature sensor wires effective date of 3898, dated
for minimum clearance. this AD) or within November 2008.
the next 12 months
after April 15,
2010 (the effective
date of this AD),
whichever occurs
first.
(2) If, during the Before further Follow Hawker
inspection required in flight after the Beechcraft
paragraph (f)(1) of this inspection where Mandatory Service
AD, the stand-off hardware the missing stand- Bulletin SB 32-
is not installed or it does off hardware and/or 3898, dated
not maintain the minimum inadequate November 2008.
clearance, install stand- clearance was found.
off hardware as specified
in the service information.
(3) Inspect the brake Within the next 50 Follow Hawker
reservoir line and the fuel hours TIS after Beechcraft
heater power wire for April 15, 2010 (the Mandatory Service
damage. effective date of Bulletin SB 32-
this AD) or within 3898, dated
the next 12 months November 2008.
after April 15,
2010 (the effective
date of this AD),
whichever occurs
first.
(4) If, during the Before further Follow Hawker
inspection required in flight after the Beechcraft
paragraph (f)(3) of this inspection where Mandatory Service
AD, damage is found, repair damaged tubing and/ Bulletin SB 32-
or replace damaged tubing or wiring was found. 3898, dated
and/or wiring found. November 2008.
(5) Inspect the installation Within the next 50 Follow Hawker
of the stand-off hardware hours TIS after Beechcraft
between the brake reservoir April 15, 2010 (the Mandatory Service
line and the fuel heater effective date of Bulletin SB 32-
power wire for minimum this AD) or within 3898, dated
clearance. the next 12 months November 2008.
after April 15,
2010 (the effective
date of this AD),
whichever occurs
first.
(6) If, during the Before further Follow Hawker
inspection required in flight after the Beechcraft
paragraph (f)(5) of this inspection where Mandatory Service
AD, the stand-off hardware the missing stand- Bulletin SB 32-
is not installed or it does off hardware and/or 3898, dated
not maintain the minimum inadequate November 2008.
clearance, install stand- clearance was found.
off hardware as specified
in the service information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer, FAA Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone: (316) 946-4174; fax: (316) 946-4107. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
32-3898, dated November 2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-
0085; telephone: 1 (800) 429-5372 or (316) 676-3140; fax: (316) 676-
3340; Internet: https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call (816) 329-3768.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 2, 2010.
Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-5024 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
