Northern States Power Company of Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant; Exemption, 11578-11579 [2010-4526]
Download as PDF
11578
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices
301–492–3668 or via e-mail at
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Michael T. Lesar,
Chief, Rulemaking and Directives
Branch (RDB), Division of
Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, or by fax to RDB at (301) 492–
3446.
To be considered in the scoping
process, written comments should be
postmarked by May 11, 2010. Comments
will be available electronically and
accessible through ADAMS at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Participation in the scoping process
for the supplement to the GEIS does not
entitle participants to become parties to
the proceeding to which the supplement
to the GEIS relates. Matters related to
participation in any hearing are outside
the scope of matters to be discussed at
this public meeting.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of March 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bo M. Pham,
Chief, Projects Branch 1, Division of License
Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–5270 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–263; NRC–2010–0045]
Northern States Power Company of
Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear
Generating Plant; Exemption
1.0
Background
Northern States Power Company of
Minnesota (NSPM, the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License No.
DPR–22, which authorizes operation of
the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
(MNGP). The license provides, among
other things, that the facility is subject
to all rules, regulations, and orders of
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a General
Electric boiling-water reactor located in
Wright County, Minnesota.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Mar 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with
a full implementation date of March 31,
2010, requires licensees to protect, with
high assurance, against radiological
sabotage by designing and
implementing comprehensive site
security programs. The amendments to
10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
and implemented by licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post-September
11, 2001, security orders. It is from two
of these new requirements that NSPM
now seeks an exemption from the March
31, 2010, implementation date. All other
physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March
31, 2010.
By letter dated November 3, 2009, the
licensee requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
exemptions.’’ The licensee’s November
3, 2009, letter contains security-related
information and, accordingly, is not
available to the public. The licensee
submitted a redacted version of its
exemption request on December 15,
2009, which is publicly available. The
licensee has requested an exemption
from the March 31, 2010, compliance
date stating that it must complete a
number of significant modifications to
the current site security configuration
before all requirements can be met.
Specifically, the request is to extend the
compliance date for two specific items
from the current March 31, 2010,
deadline to June 30, 2011. Being granted
this exemption for the two items would
allow the licensee to complete the
modifications designed to update aging
equipment and incorporate state-of-theart technology to meet the noted
regulatory requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
Part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR Part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
This exemption would, as noted
above, allow an extension from March
31, 2010, until June 30, 2011, to allow
for temporary noncompliance with the
new rule in two specified areas. As
stated above, 10 CFR 73.5 allows the
NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 73. The
NRC staff has determined that granting
of the licensee’s proposed exemption
will not result in a violation of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
or the Commission’s regulations.
Therefore, the exemption is authorized
by law.
In the draft final rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed
that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180
days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new
requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. From
this, it is clear that the Commission
wanted to provide a reasonable
timeframe for licensees to achieve full
compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected a request to generically extend
the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from
R.W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee’s
request for an exemption is, therefore,
consistent with the approach set forth
by the Commission and discussed in the
June 4, 2009, letter.
MNGP’s Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed
information in its November 3, 2009,
request for exemption. It described a
comprehensive plan to install
equipment related to certain
requirements in the new Part 73 rule
and provided a timeline for achieving
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
full compliance with the new
regulation. The submittal contains
security-related information regarding
the site security plan, details of the
specific requirements of the regulation
for which the site cannot be in
compliance by the March 31, 2010,
deadline and why the required changes
to the site’s security configuration
cannot be completed by the deadline,
and a timeline with critical path
activities that will bring MNGP into full
compliance by June 30, 2011. The
timeline provides dates indicating when
(1) construction will begin on various
phases of the project (e.g., buildings,
fences); (2) critical equipment will be
ordered, installed, tested and become
operational; and (3) anticipated
impediments to construction such as
planned refueling outages and winter
weather conditions that may impair
construction.
Notwithstanding the schedular
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee will continue
to be in compliance with all other
applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC
approved physical security program. By
June 30, 2011, MNGP will be in full
compliance with all the regulatory
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued
on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s submittal and concludes that
the licensee has provided adequate
justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to June
30, 2011, with regard to the specified
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ exemption
from the March 31, 2010, compliance
date is authorized by law and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and is otherwise
in the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The long-term benefits that will be
realized when the modifications to the
two specific items are complete justify
exceeding the full compliance date in
the case of this particular licensee. The
security measures that the licensee
needs additional time to implement are
new requirements imposed by the
March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR
73.55, and are in addition to those
required by the security orders issued in
response to the events of September 11,
2001. Therefore, the NRC staff
concludes that the licensee’s actions are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:35 Mar 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
in the best interest of protecting the
public health and safety through the
security changes that will result from
granting this exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
deadline for the requirement specified
in the licensee’s November 3, 2009,
submittal, the licensee is required to be
in full compliance by June 30, 2011. In
achieving compliance, the licensee is
reminded that it is responsible for
determining the appropriate licensing
mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10
CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all
necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 6224, dated
February 8, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day
of February, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Allen G. Howe,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–4526 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–261; NRC–2010–0062]
Carolina Power & Light Company H. B.
Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit
No. 2; Exemption
1.0
Background
Carolina Power & Light Company (the
licensee) is the holder of Facility
Operating License No. DPF–23, which
authorizes operation of the H. B.
Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit 2
(HBRSEP). The license provides, among
other things, that the facility is subject
to all rules, regulations, and orders of
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a pressurized
water reactor located in Darlington
County, South Carolina.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, ‘‘Physical
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11579
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with
a full implementation date of March 31,
2010, requires licensees to protect, with
high assurance, against radiological
sabotage by designing and
implementing comprehensive site
security programs. The amendments to
10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009 establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001
and implemented by licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post September
11, 2001 security orders. It is from 2 of
these new requirements that HBRSEP
now seeks an exemption from the March
31, 2010 implementation date. All other
physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking
have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March
31, 2010.
By letter dated November 30, 2009,
the licensee requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
exemptions.’’ The licensee’s November
30, 2009, letter contains proprietary and
security-related information that,
accordingly, is not available to the
public. The licensee has requested an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date stating that it must
complete a number of significant
modifications to the current site security
configuration before all requirements
can be met. Specifically, the request is
for two requirements that will be met by
December 30, 2010, versus the March
31, 2010, deadline to. Being granted this
exemption for the two items will allow
the licensee to complete the
modifications designed to meet or
exceed the noted regulatory
requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
Part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11578-11579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-263; NRC-2010-0045]
Northern States Power Company of Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear
Generating Plant; Exemption
1.0 Background
Northern States Power Company of Minnesota (NSPM, the licensee) is
the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-22, which authorizes
operation of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). The
license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to
all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a General Electric boiling-water reactor
located in Wright County, Minnesota.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' Section 73.55,
``Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in
nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage,'' published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with a full implementation date of
March 31, 2010, requires licensees to protect, with high assurance,
against radiological sabotage by designing and implementing
comprehensive site security programs. The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55
published on March 27, 2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, and implemented by licensees. In addition, the amendments to 10
CFR 73.55 include additional requirements to further enhance site
security based upon insights gained from implementation of the post-
September 11, 2001, security orders. It is from two of these new
requirements that NSPM now seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated November 3, 2009, the licensee requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.'' The
licensee's November 3, 2009, letter contains security-related
information and, accordingly, is not available to the public. The
licensee submitted a redacted version of its exemption request on
December 15, 2009, which is publicly available. The licensee has
requested an exemption from the March 31, 2010, compliance date stating
that it must complete a number of significant modifications to the
current site security configuration before all requirements can be met.
Specifically, the request is to extend the compliance date for two
specific items from the current March 31, 2010, deadline to June 30,
2011. Being granted this exemption for the two items would allow the
licensee to complete the modifications designed to update aging
equipment and incorporate state-of-the-art technology to meet the noted
regulatory requirements.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions From the March 31, 2010,
Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ``By March 31, 2010, each nuclear
power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR Part 50, shall implement
the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards
Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as `security plans.' '' Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part
73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
This exemption would, as noted above, allow an extension from March
31, 2010, until June 30, 2011, to allow for temporary noncompliance
with the new rule in two specified areas. As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5
allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part
73. The NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensee's
proposed exemption will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
In the draft final rule provided to the Commission, the NRC staff
proposed that the requirements of the new regulation be met within 180
days. The Commission directed a change from 180 days to approximately 1
year for licensees to fully implement the new requirements. This change
was incorporated into the final rule. From this, it is clear that the
Commission wanted to provide a reasonable timeframe for licensees to
achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct site-specific analyses to determine
what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and
that changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing
mechanisms, including exemptions. Since issuance of the final rule, the
Commission has rejected a request to generically extend the rule's
compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that
the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance
date (Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R.W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S.
Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee's request for an
exemption is, therefore, consistent with the approach set forth by the
Commission and discussed in the June 4, 2009, letter.
MNGP's Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided detailed information in its November 3, 2009,
request for exemption. It described a comprehensive plan to install
equipment related to certain requirements in the new Part 73 rule and
provided a timeline for achieving
[[Page 11579]]
full compliance with the new regulation. The submittal contains
security-related information regarding the site security plan, details
of the specific requirements of the regulation for which the site
cannot be in compliance by the March 31, 2010, deadline and why the
required changes to the site's security configuration cannot be
completed by the deadline, and a timeline with critical path activities
that will bring MNGP into full compliance by June 30, 2011. The
timeline provides dates indicating when (1) construction will begin on
various phases of the project (e.g., buildings, fences); (2) critical
equipment will be ordered, installed, tested and become operational;
and (3) anticipated impediments to construction such as planned
refueling outages and winter weather conditions that may impair
construction.
Notwithstanding the schedular exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee will continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC approved physical security
program. By June 30, 2011, MNGP will be in full compliance with all the
regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's submittal and concludes
that the licensee has provided adequate justification for its request
for an extension of the compliance date to June 30, 2011, with regard
to the specified requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The long-term benefits that will be realized when the modifications
to the two specific items are complete justify exceeding the full
compliance date in the case of this particular licensee. The security
measures that the licensee needs additional time to implement are new
requirements imposed by the March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55,
and are in addition to those required by the security orders issued in
response to the events of September 11, 2001. Therefore, the NRC staff
concludes that the licensee's actions are in the best interest of
protecting the public health and safety through the security changes
that will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to
grant an exemption from the March 31, 2010, deadline for the
requirement specified in the licensee's November 3, 2009, submittal,
the licensee is required to be in full compliance by June 30, 2011. In
achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded that it is responsible
for determining the appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR
50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all necessary changes to
its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact,'' the
Commission has previously determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 6224, dated February 8, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of February, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Allen G. Howe,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-4526 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P