Central Arkansas National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Arkansas, 11195-11196 [2010-5071]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Notices
South, Range 22 East, of the New
Mexico Principal Meridian, accepted
January 15, 2010, for Group 1096 NM.
If a protest against a survey, as shown
on any of the above plats is received
prior to the date of official filing, the
filing will be stayed pending
consideration of the protest. A plat will
not be officially filed until the day after
all protests have been dismissed and
become final or appeals from the
dismissal affirmed.
A person or party who wishes to
protest against any of these surveys
must file a written protest with the New
Mexico State Director, Bureau of Land
Management, stating that they wish to
protest.
A statement of reasons for a protest
may be filed with the notice of protest
to the State Director, or the statement of
reasons must be filed with the State
Director within thirty (30) days after the
protest is filed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
These plats will be available for
inspection in the New Mexico State
Office, Bureau of Land Management,
P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico,
87502–0115. Copies may be obtained
from this office upon payment. Contact
Marcella Montoya at 505–954–2097, or
Marcella_Montoya@nm.blm.gov, for
assistance.
Stephen W. Beyerlein,
Acting, Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey/
GeoSciences.
[FR Doc. 2010–5161 Filed 3–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N251; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
Central Arkansas National Wildlife
Refuge Complex, Arkansas
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
environmental assessment for the
Central Arkansas National Wildlife
Refuge (NWR) Complex, consisting of
Bald Knob, Big Lake, Cache River, and
Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuges.
In the final CCP, we describe how we
will manage the Central Arkansas NWR
Complex over the next 15 years.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
You may obtain a copy of
the CCP by writing to: Mr. William R.
Smith, Planning Team Leader, Central
Arkansas National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 26320 Highway 33 South,
Augusta, AR 72006. You may also
access and download the document
from the Service’s Internet Web site:
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/
under ‘‘Final Documents.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
William R. Smith; telephone: 870/347–
2074; fax: 870/347–2908; e-mail:
william_r_smith@fws.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for the Central Arkansas NWR
Complex. We started this process
through a notice in the Federal Register
on January 3, 2007 (72 FR 142). For
more about the process, please see that
notice.
The Central Arkansas NWR Complex
is comprised of Bald Knob, Big Lake,
Cache River, and Wapanocca National
Wildlife Refuges. These four refuges are
in eastern and central Arkansas and
together encompass approximately
99,100 acres.
Significant issues identified in the
CCP include management of the
following: (1) Waterfowl, other
migratory birds, and other native
wildlife species; (2) bottomland
hardwood reforestation; (3) moist-soil
impoundments and croplands; (4) water
quality; (5) invasive species; (6) land
acquisition; and (7) visitor services (e.g.,
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, environmental
education and interpretation, access,
and facilities).
Bald Knob National Wildlife Refuge
Bald Knob National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR), near the town of Bald Knob in
White County, Arkansas, was
established in 1993 to protect and
provide feeding and resting areas for
migrating waterfowl, and now totals
16,100 acres of forested wetlands, moistsoil impoundments, and croplands. The
refuge hosts one of the largest
populations of wintering pintails in the
State and is a crucial staging area for
pintails migrating to the coastal areas of
Louisiana and eastern Texas. The refuge
has been named as an ‘‘Important
Birding Area’’ by the Audubon Arkansas
Board of Directors.
11195
of President Woodrow Wilson, to serve
as a reserve and breeding ground for
native birds. The refuge encompasses
11,038 acres of lake and swamp
habitats, including the 2,144-acre Big
Lake Wilderness. Big Lake NWR
provides important migratory bird
habitat and is designated as a ‘‘National
Natural Landmark Area.’’ The American
Bird Conservancy also has listed the
refuge as a ‘‘Globally Important Bird
Area.’’
Cache River National Wildlife Refuge
Cache River National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR), near the towns of Augusta and
Brinkley, Arkansas, was established in
1986 to provide critical wintering
habitat for waterfowl and other
migratory and resident wildlife species.
Cache River NWR presently
encompasses 66,350 acres of an
approved land acquisition boundary of
185,574 acres within Jackson, Monroe,
Prairie, and Woodruff Counties. Cache
River NWR features some of the largest
remaining tracts of bottomland
hardwood forests within the Mississippi
Alluvial Valley, and is designated as a
‘‘Wetland of International Importance.’’
Cache River NWR is noted as part of the
most important wintering habitats for
mallards in North America.
Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuge
Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) is 20 miles northwest of
Memphis, Tennessee, and near the town
of Turrell, in Crittenden County,
Arkansas. It was established in 1961 to
provide a wintering area for migratory
waterfowl, and presently encompasses
5,620 acres of agricultural land,
grassland, bottomland hardwood forest,
and flooded cypress/willow swamp.
The refuge is important as a nesting area
for resident wood ducks and provides
significant habitat along the Mississippi
River that is heavily used by migrating
and wintering waterfowl. The American
Bird Conservancy has listed the refuge
as a ‘‘Continentally Important Bird
Area.’’
Big Lake National Wildlife Refuge
Alternatives, Including the Preferred
Alternative
A planning team comprised of Service
personnel, State agency representatives,
non-governmental organizations, and
others developed three alternatives for
managing the refuges over the next 15
years and chose Alternative C as the
preferred alternative. A description of
the three alternatives follows.
Big Lake National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR), near the town of Manila in
Mississippi County, Arkansas, was
established in 1915 by executive order
Alternative A—Maintain Current
Management (No Action Alternative)
Under Alternative A, the ‘‘No Action’’
alternative, management would not
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
11196
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Notices
change from the current actions and
direction. We would continue to restore,
protect, and manage bottomland
hardwood forests, wetlands, cropland
units, moist-soil units, open water areas,
grassland/scrub-shrub areas, and the Big
Lake Wilderness. We would continue to
focus management activities on
afforestation and reforestation,
restoration of wetlands, invasive plants
and nuisance animals, cooperative
farming, inventorying and monitoring,
and priority public uses (e.g., hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation). We
would acquire land from willing sellers,
but only within the approved
acquisition boundaries.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative B—Minimal Management
Alternative
Under Alternative B, the ‘‘Minimal
Management’’ alternative, we would
undertake minimal wildlife, habitat, and
infrastructure management. In this ‘‘let
nature take its course’’ alternative, there
would be no more active reforestation
efforts, no moist-soil impoundments
and croplands, and no more road,
beaver dam, or invasive species
management and maintenance
programs. Natural succession would be
allowed to proceed unchecked,
providing for development of early stage
or successional forest habitat on
abandoned lands, and no silvicultural
treatments in existing forest stands
would be conducted. All refuges would
implement a custodial or passive
stewardship approach to management
and would monitor natural succession
and wildlife populations over time.
Quality and quantity of habitats for
wildlife would be expected to decline,
along with wildlife use of these habitats.
There would likely be reduced
associated public use, because roadways
and facilities would not be maintained
and the quality of visitor services would
diminish. There would be no change in
the acreage or amount of waterfowl
sanctuaries. We would acquire land
from willing sellers, but only within the
approved acquisition boundaries.
Alternative C—Enhanced Habitat
Management and Public Use Programs
(Preferred Alternative)
By implementing Alternative C, the
‘‘Preferred’’ alternative, we will actively
expand and improve habitat
management and public use programs.
We will intensify and enhance forest,
moist-soil, scrub-shrub, grassland, and
aquatic management programs in order
to increase benefits for waterfowl,
shorebirds, water birds, other migratory
birds, and other species of native
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:17 Mar 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
wildlife. Hydrologic, wetland, and forest
restoration projects will also be
expanded. Invasive plant and animal
control projects will be increased. A full
range of programs involving
inventorying, monitoring, and
researching will be developed and
implemented to enable adaptive
management. Habitat conservation and
restoration will continue and expand
through land acquired from willing
sellers, but boundary expansions will
also be pursued. Environmental
education and interpretive programs
will be improved as part of a
comprehensive visitor services program.
Opportunities for hunting, fishing, and
wildlife observation will be expanded,
and law enforcement coverage will be
increased for more effective protection
of resources and visitors. Additional
staff will be recruited, additional
equipment will be acquired, and
improved facilities will be installed to
enable implementation of these projects
and programs.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act), as
amended by the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Administration Act.
Comments
We solicited comments on the Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/
EA) for the Central Arkansas NWR
Complex for 30 days, as announced in
the Federal Register on August 27, 2009
(74 FR 43716). A total of 24 individuals,
representing landowners, citizens,
conservation organizations, and State
and Federal government agencies,
attended 5 public meetings to discuss
the Draft CCP/EA and 14 respondents
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provided comments. We reviewed all
comments and have included them with
our responses in the CCP.
Selected Alternative
We selected Alternative C, the
planning team’s preferred alternative, as
the most reasonable alternative to
implement the CCP. Under Alternative
C, habitat and public use management
will be enhanced and expanded overall,
providing additional or increased
benefits to refuge resources and visitor
services and greater fulfillment of refuge
purposes. With the implementation of
Alternative C, the capacity and
capability of the refuges to better
manage the habitat and wildlife
resources and to provide visitor services
will greatly increase compared to
Alternatives A or B. The additions to
staffing and improvements to facilities
under Alternative C will enhance
effective refuge administration and
visitor services.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: December 15, 2009.
Patrick Leonard,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–5071 Filed 3–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—ASTM International
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 16, 2010, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ASTM
International (‘‘ASTM’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, ASTM has provided an
updated list of current, ongoing ASTM
standards activities originating between
May, 2009, and September, 2009,
designated as Work Items. A complete
listing of ASTM Work Items, along with
a brief description of each, is available
at https://www.astm.org.
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11195-11196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5071]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2009-N251; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Central Arkansas National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Arkansas
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: final comprehensive conservation plan
and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental
assessment for the Central Arkansas National Wildlife Refuge (NWR)
Complex, consisting of Bald Knob, Big Lake, Cache River, and Wapanocca
National Wildlife Refuges. In the final CCP, we describe how we will
manage the Central Arkansas NWR Complex over the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the CCP by writing to: Mr. William
R. Smith, Planning Team Leader, Central Arkansas National Wildlife
Refuge Complex, 26320 Highway 33 South, Augusta, AR 72006. You may also
access and download the document from the Service's Internet Web site:
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/ under ``Final Documents.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William R. Smith; telephone: 870/
347-2074; fax: 870/347-2908; e-mail: william_r_smith@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for the Central
Arkansas NWR Complex. We started this process through a notice in the
Federal Register on January 3, 2007 (72 FR 142). For more about the
process, please see that notice.
The Central Arkansas NWR Complex is comprised of Bald Knob, Big
Lake, Cache River, and Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuges. These four
refuges are in eastern and central Arkansas and together encompass
approximately 99,100 acres.
Significant issues identified in the CCP include management of the
following: (1) Waterfowl, other migratory birds, and other native
wildlife species; (2) bottomland hardwood reforestation; (3) moist-soil
impoundments and croplands; (4) water quality; (5) invasive species;
(6) land acquisition; and (7) visitor services (e.g., hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife photography, environmental education and
interpretation, access, and facilities).
Bald Knob National Wildlife Refuge
Bald Knob National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), near the town of Bald
Knob in White County, Arkansas, was established in 1993 to protect and
provide feeding and resting areas for migrating waterfowl, and now
totals 16,100 acres of forested wetlands, moist-soil impoundments, and
croplands. The refuge hosts one of the largest populations of wintering
pintails in the State and is a crucial staging area for pintails
migrating to the coastal areas of Louisiana and eastern Texas. The
refuge has been named as an ``Important Birding Area'' by the Audubon
Arkansas Board of Directors.
Big Lake National Wildlife Refuge
Big Lake National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), near the town of Manila in
Mississippi County, Arkansas, was established in 1915 by executive
order of President Woodrow Wilson, to serve as a reserve and breeding
ground for native birds. The refuge encompasses 11,038 acres of lake
and swamp habitats, including the 2,144-acre Big Lake Wilderness. Big
Lake NWR provides important migratory bird habitat and is designated as
a ``National Natural Landmark Area.'' The American Bird Conservancy
also has listed the refuge as a ``Globally Important Bird Area.''
Cache River National Wildlife Refuge
Cache River National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), near the towns of
Augusta and Brinkley, Arkansas, was established in 1986 to provide
critical wintering habitat for waterfowl and other migratory and
resident wildlife species. Cache River NWR presently encompasses 66,350
acres of an approved land acquisition boundary of 185,574 acres within
Jackson, Monroe, Prairie, and Woodruff Counties. Cache River NWR
features some of the largest remaining tracts of bottomland hardwood
forests within the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, and is designated as a
``Wetland of International Importance.'' Cache River NWR is noted as
part of the most important wintering habitats for mallards in North
America.
Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuge
Wapanocca National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is 20 miles northwest of
Memphis, Tennessee, and near the town of Turrell, in Crittenden County,
Arkansas. It was established in 1961 to provide a wintering area for
migratory waterfowl, and presently encompasses 5,620 acres of
agricultural land, grassland, bottomland hardwood forest, and flooded
cypress/willow swamp. The refuge is important as a nesting area for
resident wood ducks and provides significant habitat along the
Mississippi River that is heavily used by migrating and wintering
waterfowl. The American Bird Conservancy has listed the refuge as a
``Continentally Important Bird Area.''
Alternatives, Including the Preferred Alternative
A planning team comprised of Service personnel, State agency
representatives, non-governmental organizations, and others developed
three alternatives for managing the refuges over the next 15 years and
chose Alternative C as the preferred alternative. A description of the
three alternatives follows.
Alternative A--Maintain Current Management (No Action Alternative)
Under Alternative A, the ``No Action'' alternative, management
would not
[[Page 11196]]
change from the current actions and direction. We would continue to
restore, protect, and manage bottomland hardwood forests, wetlands,
cropland units, moist-soil units, open water areas, grassland/scrub-
shrub areas, and the Big Lake Wilderness. We would continue to focus
management activities on afforestation and reforestation, restoration
of wetlands, invasive plants and nuisance animals, cooperative farming,
inventorying and monitoring, and priority public uses (e.g., hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental
education and interpretation). We would acquire land from willing
sellers, but only within the approved acquisition boundaries.
Alternative B--Minimal Management Alternative
Under Alternative B, the ``Minimal Management'' alternative, we
would undertake minimal wildlife, habitat, and infrastructure
management. In this ``let nature take its course'' alternative, there
would be no more active reforestation efforts, no moist-soil
impoundments and croplands, and no more road, beaver dam, or invasive
species management and maintenance programs. Natural succession would
be allowed to proceed unchecked, providing for development of early
stage or successional forest habitat on abandoned lands, and no
silvicultural treatments in existing forest stands would be conducted.
All refuges would implement a custodial or passive stewardship approach
to management and would monitor natural succession and wildlife
populations over time. Quality and quantity of habitats for wildlife
would be expected to decline, along with wildlife use of these
habitats. There would likely be reduced associated public use, because
roadways and facilities would not be maintained and the quality of
visitor services would diminish. There would be no change in the
acreage or amount of waterfowl sanctuaries. We would acquire land from
willing sellers, but only within the approved acquisition boundaries.
Alternative C--Enhanced Habitat Management and Public Use Programs
(Preferred Alternative)
By implementing Alternative C, the ``Preferred'' alternative, we
will actively expand and improve habitat management and public use
programs. We will intensify and enhance forest, moist-soil, scrub-
shrub, grassland, and aquatic management programs in order to increase
benefits for waterfowl, shorebirds, water birds, other migratory birds,
and other species of native wildlife. Hydrologic, wetland, and forest
restoration projects will also be expanded. Invasive plant and animal
control projects will be increased. A full range of programs involving
inventorying, monitoring, and researching will be developed and
implemented to enable adaptive management. Habitat conservation and
restoration will continue and expand through land acquired from willing
sellers, but boundary expansions will also be pursued. Environmental
education and interpretive programs will be improved as part of a
comprehensive visitor services program. Opportunities for hunting,
fishing, and wildlife observation will be expanded, and law enforcement
coverage will be increased for more effective protection of resources
and visitors. Additional staff will be recruited, additional equipment
will be acquired, and improved facilities will be installed to enable
implementation of these projects and programs.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop
a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Comments
We solicited comments on the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for the Central Arkansas
NWR Complex for 30 days, as announced in the Federal Register on August
27, 2009 (74 FR 43716). A total of 24 individuals, representing
landowners, citizens, conservation organizations, and State and Federal
government agencies, attended 5 public meetings to discuss the Draft
CCP/EA and 14 respondents provided comments. We reviewed all comments
and have included them with our responses in the CCP.
Selected Alternative
We selected Alternative C, the planning team's preferred
alternative, as the most reasonable alternative to implement the CCP.
Under Alternative C, habitat and public use management will be enhanced
and expanded overall, providing additional or increased benefits to
refuge resources and visitor services and greater fulfillment of refuge
purposes. With the implementation of Alternative C, the capacity and
capability of the refuges to better manage the habitat and wildlife
resources and to provide visitor services will greatly increase
compared to Alternatives A or B. The additions to staffing and
improvements to facilities under Alternative C will enhance effective
refuge administration and visitor services.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: December 15, 2009.
Patrick Leonard,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-5071 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P