Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2010, 11376-11402 [2010-4528]

Download as PDF 11376 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171 [NRC–2009–0333] RIN 3150–AI70 Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2010 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its applicants and licensees. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA–90), as amended, which requires the NRC to recover through fees approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in fiscal year (FY) 2010, not including amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund (NWF), amounts appropriated for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR), and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security activities. Based on the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2010, signed by the President on October 28, 2009, the NRC’s required fee recovery amount for the FY 2010 budget is approximately $912.2 million. After accounting for billing adjustments, the total amount to be billed as fees is approximately $911.1 million. DATES: The comment period expires April 9, 2010. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure only that comments received on or before this date will be considered. Because OBRA–90 requires that the NRC collect the FY 2010 fees by September 30, 2010, requests for extensions of the comment period will not be granted. ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC–2009–0333 in the subject line of your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web site Regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against including any information in your submission that you do not want to be publicly disclosed. The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not include any information in their comments that they do not want publicly disclosed. You may submit comments by any one of the following methods. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC–2009–0333. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher 301–492–3668; e-mail Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. E-mail comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do not receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your comments, contact us directly at 301–415–1677. Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. (Telephone 301–415– 1677.) Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301– 415–1101. You can access publicly available documents related to this document using the following methods: NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have copied for a fee publicly available documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are available electronically at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC’s public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Federal Rulemaking Web site: Public comments and supporting materials related to this proposed rule can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: NRC–2009– 0333. To obtain additional information on the NRC’s FY 2010 budget request, commenters and others may review NUREG–1100, Volume 25, ‘‘Performance Budget: Fiscal Year 2010’’ (May 2009), which describes the NRC’s budget for PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 FY 2010, including the activities to be performed in each program. This document is available on the NRC’s public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/ sr1100/. Note, however, that NUREG– 1100, Volume 25, is based on the NRC’s FY 2010 budget request to Congress, and that the fees in this rulemaking are based on the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111– 85). The NRC’s total appropriation of $1,066.9 million is approximately $4.2 million less than the agency’s FY 2010 budget request to Congress. However, adjustments to NRC’s budget request resulted in an approximately $25 million increase to NRC’s total fee recovery amount from the FY 2010 budget request. The allocation of the Public Law 111–85 budget to planned activities within each program, and to each fee class and fee-relief category, is included in the publicly available work papers supporting this rulemaking. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca I. Erickson, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone 301–415– 7126, e-mail Rebecca.Erickson@NRC.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background II. Proposed Action A. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170: Fees for Facilities, Materials, Import and Export Licenses, and Other Regulatory Services Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended B. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 171: Annual Fees for Reactor Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses, Including Holders of Certificates of Compliance, Registrations, and Quality Assurance Program Approvals and Government Agencies Licensed by the NRC III. Plain Language IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards V. Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement VII. Regulatory Analysis VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis IX. Backfit Analysis I. Background The NRC is required each year, under OBRA–90 (42 U.S.C. 2214), as amended, to recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority, not including amounts appropriated from the NWF, amounts appropriated for WIR, and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security activities (non-fee items), through fees to NRC licensees and applicants. The NRC receives 10 percent of its budget authority (not E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules including non-fee items) from the general fund each year to pay for the cost of agency activities that do not provide a direct benefit to NRC licensees, such as international assistance and Agreement State activities (as defined under section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended). The NRC assesses two types of fees to meet the requirements of OBRA–90. First, user fees, presented in 10 CFR part 170 under the authority of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA) (31 U.S.C. 9701), recover the NRC’s cost of providing special benefits to identifiable applicants and licensees. For example, the NRC assesses these fees to cover the cost of inspections, applications for new licenses and license renewals, and requests for license amendments. Second, annual fees, presented in 10 CFR part 171 under the authority of OBRA–90, recover generic regulatory costs not otherwise recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees. Based on Public Law 111–85, the NRC’s required fee recovery amount for the FY 2010 budget is approximately $912.2 million, which is reduced by approximately $1.1 million to account for billing adjustments (i.e., expected unpaid invoices, payments for prior year invoices), resulting in a total of approximately $911.1 million to be billed as fees in FY 2010. In accordance with OBRA–90, $22.2 million of the agency’s budgeted resources for generic homeland security activities are excluded from the NRC’s fee base in FY 2010. These funds cover generic activities such as rulemakings and the development of guidance documents that support entire license fee classes or classes of licensees. Under its IOAA authority, the NRC will continue to charge part 170 fees for all licensee-specific homeland securityrelated services provided, including security inspections and security plan reviews. The amount of the NRC’s required fee collections is set by law, and is, therefore, outside the scope of this rulemaking. In FY 2010, the NRC’s total fee recovery amount has increased by $41.5 million from FY 2009, mostly in response to increased activities for reactor oversight, new reactor programs, information technology support, homeland security issues, and licensing reviews for fuel facilities, non-power reactors and spent fuel storage. The FY 2010 budget was allocated to the fee classes that the budgeted activities support. As such, the annual fees for power reactor, most fuel facility, uranium recovery, and small materials licensees have increased. Another factor affecting the amount of annual fees for each fee class is the estimated collection under part 170, discussed in Section II, ‘‘Proposed Action’’, of this document. II. Proposed Action The NRC is proposing to amend its licensing, inspection, and annual fees to 11377 recover approximately 90 percent of its FY 2010 budget authority less the appropriations for non-fee items. The NRC’s total budget authority for FY 2010 is $1,066.9 million. The non-fee items include $29.0 million appropriated from the NWF, $2.1 million for WIR activities, and $22.2 million for generic homeland security activities. Based on the 90 percent feerecovery requirement, the NRC will have to recover approximately $912.2 million in FY 2010 through part 170 licensing and inspection fees and part 171 annual fees. The amount required by law to be recovered through fees for FY 2010 would be $41.5 million more than the amount estimated for recovery in FY 2009, an increase of approximately 5 percent. The FY 2010 fee recovery amount is reduced by $1.1 million to account for billing adjustments (i.e., for FY 2010 invoices that the NRC estimates will not be paid during the fiscal year, less payments received in FY 2010 for prior year invoices). This leaves approximately $911.1 million to be billed as fees in FY 2010 through part 170 licensing and inspection fees and part 171 annual fees. Table I summarizes the budget and fee recovery amounts for FY 2010. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.) TABLE I—BUDGET AND FEE RECOVERY AMOUNTS FOR FY 2010 [Dollars in millions] $1,066.9 ¥53.3 Balance ......................................................................................................................................................................................... Fee Recovery Rate for FY 2010 ......................................................................................................................................................... $1,013.6 × 90.0% Total Amount to be Recovered for FY 2010 ....................................................................................................................................... Less Part 171 Billing Adjustments: Unpaid FY 2010 Invoices (estimated) .......................................................................................................................................... Less Payments Received in FY 2010 for Prior Year Invoices (estimated) ................................................................................. $912.2 Subtotal ................................................................................................................................................................................. Amount to be Recovered Through Parts 170 and 171 Fees .............................................................................................................. Less Estimated Part 170 Fees ............................................................................................................................................................ ¥1.1 $911.1 ¥364.0 Part 171 Fee Collections Required ..................................................................................................................................................... erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Total Budget Authority ......................................................................................................................................................................... Less Non-Fee Items ............................................................................................................................................................................ $547.1 The NRC estimates that $364 million would be recovered from part 170 fees in FY 2010. This represents an increase of approximately 9 percent as compared to the actual part 170 collections of $332.6 million for FY 2009. The NRC derived the FY 2010 estimate of part 170 fee collections based on the previous four quarters of billing data for each VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 license fee class, with adjustments to account for changes in the NRC’s FY 2010 budget, as appropriate. The remaining $547.1 million would be recovered through the part 171 annual fees in FY 2010, which is an increase of approximately 4 percent compared to actual part 171 collections of $525.3 million for FY 2009. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 2.1 ¥3.2 The NRC plans to publish the final fee rule no later than June 2010. The FY 2010 final fee rule will be a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by the Congressional Review Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801–808). Therefore, the NRC’s fee schedules for FY 2010 will become effective 60 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. The NRC will send an E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11378 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules invoice for the amount of the annual fee to reactor licensees, 10 CFR part 72 licensees, major fuel cycle facilities, and other licensees with annual fees of $100,000 or more, upon publication of the FY 2010 final rule. For these licensees, payment is due on the effective date of the FY 2010 final rule. Because these licensees are billed quarterly, the payment due is the amount of the total FY 2010 annual fee, less payments made in the first three quarters of the fiscal year. Materials licensees with annual fees of less than $100,000 are billed annually. Those materials licensees whose license anniversary date during FY 2010 falls before the effective date of the FY 2010 final rule will be billed for the annual fee during the anniversary month of the license at the FY 2009 annual fee rate. Those materials licensees whose license anniversary date falls on or after the effective date of the FY 2010 final rule will be billed for the annual fee at the FY 2010 annual fee rate during the anniversary month of the license, and payment will be due on the date of the invoice. As a cost saving measure, the NRC will discontinue mailing the proposed fee rule to all licensees. Instead, the NRC will send licensees a short summary of the proposed rule and information on how to access the complete proposed rule on the Internet. The NRC currently does not mail the final fee rule to all licensees, but will send the final rule or the proposed rule to any licensee or other person upon specific request. To request a copy, contact the Accounts Receivable/ Payable Branch, Division of the Controller, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, at 301–415–7554, or e-mail fees.resource@nrc.gov. In addition to publication in the Federal Register, both the proposed and final rules will be available on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov. The NRC plans to review its fee policies for power reactors. The NRC anticipates that it will receive applications to license small and medium sized commercial nuclear reactors. The NRC published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12735) to receive early input from the public on issues relevant to the establishment of an annual fee structure based on the size of the reactor. The NRC received sixteen comments in response to the ANPR. The general consensus from the commenters is that an adjustment to the current power reactor annual fee methodology is needed to account for small and medium sized power reactors. The NRC plans to analyze suggested methodologies for a variable annual fee structure for power reactors and present its findings in a future proposed rule. The NRC also plans to change its current policy with regard to billing inspection costs. Currently, inspection costs are billed only after the inspection is completed (i.e., approximately 30 days after the inspection report is issued). As a result, in some cases inspection costs accumulate over several billing cycles, and the licensee receives one invoice for these accumulated costs rather than being billed as the costs are incurred. Therefore, the NRC plans to bill for accumulated inspection costs before issuance of the inspection report. Billing for incurred inspection costs will begin when the NRC’s new accounting system is implemented, scheduled for early FY 2011. This policy change does not require a revision to part 170. The NRC is proposing to amend 10 CFR parts 170 and 171, as discussed in Sections II.A and II.B of this document. A. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170: Fees for Facilities, Materials, Import and Export Licenses, and Other Regulatory Services Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended In FY 2010, the NRC is proposing to increase the hourly rate to recover the full cost of activities under part 170 and is using this rate to calculate ‘‘flat’’ application fees. The NRC is proposing the following changes: 1. Hourly Rate The NRC’s hourly rate is used in assessing full cost fees for specific services provided, as well as flat fees for certain application reviews. The NRC is proposing to change the FY 2010 hourly rate to $259. This rate would be applicable to all activities for which fees are assessed under §§ 170.21 and 170.31. The FY 2010 proposed hourly rate is higher than the hourly rate of $257 in the FY 2009 final fee rule. The increase is primarily due to the higher FY 2010 budget supporting increased infrastructure and support costs for the new reactors program, fuel facility reviews, reactor licensing renewal, international activities, and spent fuel storage and transportation activities. The hourly rate calculation is described in further detail in the following paragraphs. The NRC’s hourly rate is derived by dividing the sum of recoverable budgeted resources for (1) Mission direct program salaries and benefits; (2) mission indirect salaries and benefits and contract activity; and (3) agency management and support and the Inspector General (IG), by mission direct full-time equivalent (FTE) hours. The mission direct FTE hours are the product of the mission direct FTE times the hours per direct FTE. The only budgeted resources excluded from the hourly rate are those for mission direct contract activities. In FY 2010, the NRC is proposing to use 1,371 hours per direct FTE, the same amount as FY 2009, to calculate the hourly fees. The NRC has reviewed data from its time and labor system to determine if the annual direct hours worked per direct FTE estimate requires updating for the FY 2010 fee rule. Based on this review of the most recent data available, the NRC determined that 1,371 hours is the best estimate of direct hours worked annually per direct FTE. This estimate excludes all indirect activities such as training, general administration, and leave. Table II shows the results of the hourly rate calculation methodology. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.) erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 TABLE II—FY 2010 HOURLY RATE CALCULATION Mission Direct Program Salaries & Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... Mission Indirect Salaries & Benefits, and Contract Activity ................................................................................................................ Agency Management and Support, and the IG .................................................................................................................................. $343.8M 135.6M 330.4M Subtotal ......................................................................................................................................................................................... Less Offsetting Receipts ...................................................................................................................................................................... $809.8M ¥0.0M Total Budget Included in Hourly Rate .......................................................................................................................................... $809.8M Mission Direct FTEs ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2,276 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 11379 TABLE II—FY 2010 HOURLY RATE CALCULATION—Continued Professional Hourly Rate (Total Budget Included in Hourly Rate divided by Mission Direct FTE Hours) ......................................... As shown in Table II, dividing the $809.8 million budgeted amount (rounded) included in the hourly rate by total mission direct FTE hours (2,276 FTE times 1,371 hours) results in an hourly rate of $259. The hourly rate is rounded to the nearest whole dollar. 2. ‘‘Flat’’ Application Fee Changes The NRC is proposing to adjust the current flat application fees in §§ 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect the revised hourly rate of $259. These flat fees are calculated by multiplying the average professional staff hours needed to process the licensing actions by the proposed professional hourly rate for FY 2010. The agency estimates the average professional staff hours needed to process licensing actions every other year as part of its biennial review of fees performed in compliance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990. This review was last performed as part of the FY 2009 fee rulemaking. The higher hourly rate of $259 is the main reason for the increase in application fees. The amounts of the materials licensing flat fees are rounded so that the fees would be convenient to the user and the effects of rounding would be minimal. Fees under $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10, fees that are greater than $1,000 but less than $100,000 are rounded to the nearest $100, and fees that are greater than $100,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000. The proposed licensing flat fees are applicable for fee categories K.1. through K.5. of § 170.21, and fee categories 1.C., 1.D., 2.B., 2.C., 3.A. through 3.S., 4.B. through 9.D., 10.B., 15.A. through 15.R., 16, and 17 of § 170.31. Applications filed on or after the effective date of the FY 2010 final fee rule would be subject to the revised fees in the final rule. 3. Administrative Amendments In the FY 2009 final rule, § 170.11, regarding fee exemptions for special projects, was changed to simplify the language. The NRC is proposing to modify the introductory text of paragraph (a)(1) to clarify that this paragraph applies to special projects. There is no change to the NRC’s fee exemption policy. In addition, the NRC is updating some of the program codes found next to the materials users fee categories in § 170.31. The program codes were added in the FY 2008 final rule, and the NRC plans to update the program codes as needed. In summary, the NRC is proposing to make the following changes to 10 CFR part 170: 1. Establish a revised professional hourly rate to use in assessing fees for specific services; 2. Revise the license application fees to reflect the proposed FY 2010 hourly rate; and 3. Make certain administrative changes for purposes of updating some program codes and improving the clarity of the rule. B. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 171: Annual Fees for Reactor Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses, Including Holders of Certificates of Compliance, Registrations, and Quality Assurance Program Approvals and Government Agencies Licensed by the NRC The NRC proposes to recover its feerelief shortfall by increasing all licensees’ annual fees. This rulemaking also proposes to make changes to the number of NRC licensees and to establish rebaselined annual fees based on Public Law 111–85. The proposed amendments are described as follows: 1. Application of Fee-Relief and LowLevel Waste Surcharge The NRC is proposing to recover its fee-relief shortfall by increasing all licensees’ annual fees, based on their percent of the budget. The NRC applies the 10 percent of its budget that is excluded from fee $259 recovery under OBRA–90, as amended (fee relief), to offset the total budget allocated for activities which do not directly benefit current NRC licensees. The budget for these fee-relief activities is totaled and then reduced by the amount of the NRC’s fee relief. Any difference between the fee relief and the budgeted amount of these activities results in a fee-relief adjustment (increase or decrease) to all licensees’ annual fees, based on their percent of the budget (i.e., over 80 percent is allocated to power reactors each year). In FY 2010, the NRC’s 10 percent fee relief is less than the total budget for fee-relief activities by $7.1 million. In FY 2009, the 10 percent fee relief exceeded the total budget by $3.2 million. The FY 2010 budget for feerelief activities is higher than FY 2009, primarily due to an increase in small entity subsidies, non-profit educational exemptions, and regulatory support to Agreement States. The NRC is increasing all licensees’ annual fees to recover the shortfall amount of $7.1 million, based on their percent of the fee recoverable budget authority. This is consistent with the existing fee methodology, in that the fee-relief shortfall amount is allocated to licensees in the same manner as benefits are allocated as a reduction when the NRC receives enough fee relief to pay for fee-relief activities. In FY 2010, the power reactors class of licensees will be allocated approximately 88 percent of the fee-relief shortfall based on their share of the NRC fee recoverable budget authority. The FY 2010 budgeted resources for NRC’s fee-relief activities are $108.5 million. The NRC’s total fee relief in FY 2010 is $101.4 million, leaving a $7.1 million fee-relief shortfall to be recovered by increasing all licensees’ annual fees. These values are shown in Table III. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.) TABLE III—FEE-RELIEF ACTIVITIES erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 [Dollars in millions] FY 2010 budgeted costs 1. Activities not attributable to an existing NRC licensee or class of licensee: a. International activities ............................................................................................................................................................... b. Agreement State oversight ....................................................................................................................................................... c. Scholarships and Fellowships .................................................................................................................................................. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 $18.2 11.2 15.0 11380 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE III—FEE-RELIEF ACTIVITIES—Continued [Dollars in millions] FY 2010 budgeted costs 2. Activities not assessed part 170 licensing and inspection fees or part 171 annual fees based on existing law or Commission policy: a. Fee exemption for nonprofit educational institutions ............................................................................................................... b. Costs not recovered from small entities under 10 CFR 171.16(c) .......................................................................................... c. Regulatory support to Agreement States ................................................................................................................................. d. Generic decommissioning/reclamation (not related to the power reactor and spent fuel storage fee classes) ..................... e. In situ leach rulemaking and unregistered general licensees ................................................................................................. 17.4 6.1 23.1 15.1 2.4 Total fee-relief activities ........................................................................................................................................................ Less 10 percent of NRC’s FY 2010 total budget (less non-fee items) ............................................................................................... $108.5 ¥101.4 Fee-Relief Adjustment to be Allocated to All Licensees’ Annual Fees ............................................................................................... $7.1 Table IV shows how the NRC is allocating the $7.1 million fee-relief adjustment to each license fee class. As explained previously, the NRC is allocating this fee-relief adjustment to each license fee class based on the percent of the budget for that fee class compared to the NRC’s total budget. The fee-relief adjustment is added to the required annual fee recovery from each fee class. Separately, the NRC has continued to allocate the low-level waste (LLW) surcharge based on the volume of LLW disposal of three classes of licenses: operating reactors, fuel facilities, and materials users. Table IV also shows the allocation of the LLW surcharge activity. Because LLW activities support NRC licensees, the costs of these activities are recovered through annual fees. For FY 2010, the total budget allocated for LLW activity is $2.3 million. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.) TABLE IV—ALLOCATION OF FEE-RELIEF ADJUSTMENT AND LLW SURCHARGE LLW surcharge Fee-relief adjustment $M Operating Power Reactors ...................................................................... Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ....................................... Test and Research Reactors ................................................................... Fuel Facilities ........................................................................................... Materials Users ........................................................................................ Transportation .......................................................................................... Uranium Recovery ................................................................................... 54.0 .................... .................... 15.0 31.0 .................... .................... 1.3 .................... .................... 0.3 0.7 .................... .................... 87.8 2.7 0.2 5.5 2.6 0.5 0.7 6.3 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 7.5 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.1 Total .................................................................................................. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Percent 100.0 2.3 100.0 7.1 9.5 2. Agreement State Activities New Jersey became the 37th Agreement State, effective September 30, 2009. Materials licenses transferred to a new Agreement State are terminated by the NRC. New Jersey assumed regulatory authority for approximately 500 former NRC licensees. To mitigate the impact on the annual fee for the remaining small materials NRC licensees a larger share of the generic budget resources for small materials licensees will be allocated to the Regulatory Support to Agreement States fee-relief category, as seen in Table III. Note that the continuing costs of oversight and regulatory support for the State of New Jersey, as for any other Agreement State, are recovered as feerelief activities, consistent with existing policy. The budgeted resources for the regulatory support of Agreement State licensees are prorated to the fee-relief VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 activity, based on the percent of total licensees in Agreement States. The NRC has updated the proration percentage in its fee calculation to make sure that resources are allocated equitably between the NRC materials users fee class and the regulatory support to Agreement States fee-relief category. Accordingly, as a result of the State of New Jersey becoming an Agreement State, the NRC has increased the percentage of materials users regulatory support costs prorated to the fee-relief activity from 85 percent in FY 2009 to 87 percent in FY 2010. The resources for licensing and inspection activities supporting NRC licensees in the materials users fee class are not prorated to the fee-relief activity. 3. Revised Annual Fees The NRC is proposing to revise its annual fees in ’’ 171.15 and 171.16 for PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Percent Total $M $M FY 2010 to recover approximately 90 percent of the NRC’s FY 2010 budget authority, after subtracting the non-fee amounts and the estimated amount to be recovered through part 170 fees. The part 170 estimate for this proposed rule increased by $30.1 million from the FY 2009 fee rule, based on the latest invoice data available. The total amount to be recovered through annual fees for FY 2010 is $547.1 million. The required annual fee collection in FY 2009 was $532.6 million. The Commission has determined (71 FR 30721; May 30, 2006) that the agency should proceed with a presumption in favor of rebaselining when calculating annual fees each year. Under this method, the NRC’s budget is analyzed in detail and budgeted resources are allocated to fee classes and categories of licensees. The Commission expects that most years there will be budgetary and E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules other changes that warrant the use of the rebaselining method. As compared with FY 2009 annual fees, rebaselined fees are higher for five classes of licensees (power reactors, spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning, transportation, uranium recovery and materials users), and lower for one class of licensees (non-power reactors). Within the fuel facilities fee class, annual fees for most licensees increase, while the annual fee for one fee category decreases. The NRC’s total fee recoverable budget, as mandated by law, is approximately $41.5 million larger in FY 2010 as compared with FY 2009. Much of this increase is in response to increased activities for reactor oversight, new reactor programs, information technology support, homeland security issues, and licensing reviews for fuel facilities, non-power reactors, and spent fuel storage. The FY 2010 budget was allocated to the fee classes that the budgeted activities support. As in FY 2009, generic NRC resources supporting new uranium recovery applications are included in the budget allocated to operating power reactors and fuel facility fee classes, because these licensees will potentially benefit from increased production of uranium milled by new uranium recovery facilities. The impact of this allocation on the 11381 operating reactors and fuel facilities annual fees is less than one percent. The factors affecting all annual fees include the distribution of budgeted costs to the different classes of licenses (based on the specific activities the NRC will perform in FY 2010), the estimated part 170 collections for the various classes of licenses, and allocation of the fee-relief adjustment to all fee classes. The percentage of the NRC’s budget not subject to fee recovery remained at 10 percent from FY 2009 to FY 2010. Table V shows the rebaselined annual fees for FY 2010 for a representative list of categories of licenses. The FY 2009 fee is also shown for comparative purposes. TABLE V—REBASELINED ANNUAL FEES FOR FY 2010 FY 2009 annual fee Class/Category of licenses Operating Power Reactors (Including Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Annual Fee) ..................... Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ...................................................................................................... Test and Research Reactors (Non-power Reactors) .............................................................................................. High Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility ....................................................................................................................... Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility ........................................................................................................................ UF6 Conversion Facility ........................................................................................................................................... Conventional Mills .................................................................................................................................................... Typical Materials Users: Radiographers (Category 3O) .......................................................................................................................... Well Loggers (Category 5A) ............................................................................................................................. Gauge Users (Category 3P) ............................................................................................................................. Broad Scope Medical (Category 7B) ............................................................................................................... The work papers which support this proposed rule show in detail the allocation of NRC’s budgeted resources for each class of licenses and how the fees are calculated. The reports included in these work papers summarize the FY 2010 budgeted FTE and contract dollars allocated to each fee class and fee-relief category at the planned activity and program level and compare these allocations to those used to develop the final FY 2009 fees. The work papers are available electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: NRC–2009–0333 and at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at Web site address https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The work papers may also be examined at the NRC PDR located at One White Flint North, Room O–1F22, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The budgeted costs allocated to each class of licenses and the calculations of the rebaselined fees are described in paragraphs a. through h. of this section. Individual values in the Tables presented in this section may not sum to totals due to rounding. a. Fuel Facilities The FY 2010 budgeted cost to be recovered in the annual fees assessment to the fuel facility class of licenses [which includes licensees in fee categories 1.A.(1)(a), 1.A.(1)(b), 1.A.(2)(a), 1.A.(2)(b), 1.A.(2)(c), 1.E., and FY 2010 proposed annual fee $4,625,000 122,000 87,600 4,691,000 1,649,000 969,000 31,200 $4,719,000 143,000 81,800 5,442,000 2,048,000 1,112,000 38,300 22,700 9,700 3,700 36,300 28,200 12,000 4,500 45,100 2.A.(1), under § 171.16] is approximately $28.8 million. This value is based on the full cost of budgeted resources associated with all activities that support this fee class, which is reduced by estimated part 170 collections and adjusted for allocated generic transportation resources and feerelief. In FY 2010, the LLW surcharge for fuel facilities is added to the allocated fee-relief adjustment (see Table IV in Section II.B.1., ‘‘Application of Fee-Relief and Low-Level Waste Surcharge’’ of this document). The summary calculations used to derive this value are presented in Table VI for FY 2010, with FY 2009 values shown for comparison. TABLE VI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR FUEL FACILITIES erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 [Dollars in millions] Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final FY 2010 proposed Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $44.6 ¥22.0 $48.8 ¥21.2 Net part 171 resources ............................................................................................................................................ Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge ..................................................................................................................... $22.6 + 0.4 + 0.2 $27.6 + 0.5 + 0.7 VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11382 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE VI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR FUEL FACILITIES—Continued [Dollars in millions] Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final FY 2010 proposed Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... ¥0.2 ¥0.1 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. $23.0 $28.8 The increase in total budgeted resources allocated to this fee class from FY 2009 to FY 2010 is primarily due to increased support for environmental reviews and for licensing amendments and renewals for existing fuel fabrication facilities. This is partially offset by reductions in fuel facility inspections and licensing and inspection activities for enrichment facilities. The total required annual fee recovery amount is allocated to the individual fuel facility licensees, based on the effort/fee determination matrix developed for the FY 1999 final fee rule (64 FR 31447; June 10, 1999). In the matrix included in the publicly available NRC work papers, licensees are grouped into categories according to their licensed activities (i.e., nuclear material enrichment, processing operations, and material form) and the level, scope, depth of coverage, and rigor of generic regulatory programmatic effort applicable to each category from a safety and safeguards perspective. This methodology can be applied to determine fees for new licensees, current licensees, licensees in unique license situations, and certificate holders. This methodology is adaptable to changes in the number of licensees or certificate holders, licensed or certified material and/or activities, and total programmatic resources to be recovered through annual fees. When a license or certificate is modified, it may result in a change of category for a particular fuel facility licensee, as a result of the methodology used in the fuel facility effort/fee matrix. Consequently, this change may also have an effect on the fees assessed to other fuel facility licensees and certificate holders. For example, if a fuel facility licensee amends its license/certificate (e.g., decommissioning or license termination) that results in it not being subject to part 171 costs applicable to the fee class, then the budgeted costs for the safety and/or safeguards components will be spread among the remaining fuel facility licensees/ certificate holders. The methodology is applied as follows. First, a fee category is assigned, based on the nuclear material and activity authorized by license or certificate. Although a licensee/ certificate holder may elect not to fully use a license/certificate, the license/ certificate is still used as the source for determining authorized nuclear material possession and use/activity. Second, the category and license/certificate information are used to determine where the licensee/certificate holder fits into the matrix. The matrix depicts the categorization of licensees/certificate holders by authorized material types and use/activities. Each year, the NRC’s fuel facility project managers and regulatory analysts determine the level of effort associated with regulating each of these facilities. This is done by assigning, for each fuel facility, separate effort factors for the safety and safeguards activities associated with each type of regulatory activity. The matrix includes ten types of regulatory activities, including enrichment and scrap/waste-related activities (see the work papers for the complete list). Effort factors are assigned as follows: one (low regulatory effort), five (moderate regulatory effort), and ten (high regulatory effort). These effort factors are then totaled for each fee category, so that each fee category has a total effort factor for safety activities and a total effort factor for safeguards activities. The effort factors for the various fuel facility fee categories are summarized in Table VII. The value of the effort factors shown, as well as the percent of the total effort factor for all fuel facilities, reflects the total regulatory effort for each fee category (not per facility). Note that the total effort factors for the High Enriched Uranium Fuel (HEU), Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (LEU), Hot Cell and Uranium Enrichment fee categories have increased from FY 2009, while the Limited Operations fee category decreased from FY 2009. The safety and safeguards factors increased in FY 2010 to reflect process changes, such as emphasis on emergency planning, ongoing uranium enrichment activities, and a new facility in the Uranium Enrichment fee category. The safety factor decreases for Low Enriched Uranium Fuel and Limited Operations fee categories in FY 2010 reflect the lower level of safety issues at two facilities. Taking into account the addition of a new facility, the total safety and safeguards effort factor change is relatively small. TABLE VII—EFFORT FACTORS FOR FUEL FACILITIES Effort factors (percent of total) Number of facilities Facility type (fee category) erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Safety High Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a)) .................................................................................... Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)) ..................................................................................... Limited Operations (1.A.(2)(a)) .................................................................................................... Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b)) .............................................................. Hot Cell (1.A.(2)(c)) ..................................................................................................................... Uranium Enrichment (1.E) ........................................................................................................... UF6 Conversion (2.A.(1)) ............................................................................................................. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 10MRP3 89 (32.5) 70 (25.5) 8 (2.9) 3 (1.1) 6 (2.2) 86 (31.4) 12 (4.4) Safeguards 97 (44.3) 35 (16.0) 4 (1.8) 15 (6.8) 3 (1.4) 58 (26.5) 7 (3.2) 11383 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules For FY 2010, the total budgeted resources for safety activities, before the fee-relief adjustment is made, is $15,621,739. This amount is allocated to each fee category based on its percent of the total regulatory effort for safety activities. For example, if the total effort factor for safety activities for all fuel facilities is 100, and the total effort factor for safety activities for a given fee category is 10, that fee category will be allocated 10 percent of the total budgeted resources for safety activities. Similarly, the budgeted resources amount of $12,485,988 for safeguards activities is allocated to each fee category based on its percent of the total regulatory effort for safeguards activities. The fuel facility fee class’ portion of the fee-relief adjustment ($740,427) is allocated to each fee category based on its percent of the total regulatory effort for both safety and safeguards activities. The annual fee per licensee is then calculated by dividing the total allocated budgeted resources for the fee category by the number of licensees in that fee category as summarized in Table VIII. TABLE VIII—ANNUAL FEES FOR FUEL FACILITIES Facility type (fee category) High Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a)) ......................... Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)) ......................... Limited Operations Facility (1.A.(2)(a)) ......................... Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b)) Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c)) ......................... Uranium Enrichment (1.E.) ... UF6 Conversion (2.A.(1)) ...... FY 2010 annual fee $5,442,000 enrichment facility in FY 2010. The annual fee applicable to any type of new uranium enrichment facility is the annual fee in § 171.16, fee category 1.E., Uranium Enrichment, unless the NRC establishes a new fee category for the facility in a subsequent rulemaking. The applicable annual fee for a facility that is authorized to operate during the FY will be prorated in accordance with the provisions of § 171.17. b. Uranium Recovery Facilities 2,048,000 The total FY 2010 budgeted costs to be recovered through annual fees 702,000 assessed to the uranium recovery class 1,053,000 [which includes licensees in fee categories 2.A.(2)(a), 2.A.(2)(b), 527,000 2.A.(2)(c), 2.A.(2)(d), 2.A.(2)(e), 2.A.(3), 2,809,000 2.A.(4), 2.A.(5) and 18.B., under 1,112,000 § 171.16], is approximately $0.91 million. The derivation of this value is The NRC expects to authorize shown in Table IX, with FY 2009 values operation of one new uranium shown for comparison purposes. TABLE IX—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITIES [Dollars in millions] Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final FY 2010 proposed $7.21 ¥6.64 $6.69 ¥5.83 Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment ............................................................................................................................................... Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... $0.57 N/A ¥0.03 ¥0.03 $0.86 N/A +0.05 ¥0.01 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $0.51 $0.91 The increase in the total required annual fee recovery is mainly due to increased support for uranium recovery legal and program infrastructure and the increased fee-relief adjustment, which was a reduction in FY 2009. As in FY 2009, the NRC is proposing to exclude the generic budgeted resources supporting applications for new uranium recovery facilities from the FY 2010 annual fee charged to current uranium recovery licensees. Because operating reactors and fuel facility licensees would potentially benefit from increased production of the uranium milled by the new facilities, the budgeted resources would be allocated to these fee classes. The generic resources supporting the new uranium recovery facilities do not benefit the existing uranium recovery licensees. Since FY 2002, the NRC has computed the annual fee for the uranium recovery fee class by allocating the total annual fee amount for this fee class between the Department of Energy VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 (DOE) and the other licensees in this fee class. The NRC regulates DOE’s Title I and Title II activities under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA). The Congress established the two programs, Title I and Title II under UMTRCA, to protect the public and the environment from uranium milling. The UMTRCA Title I program is for remedial action at abandoned mill tailings sites where tailings resulted largely from production of uranium for the weapons program. The NRC also regulates DOE’s UMTRCA Title II program which is directed toward uranium mill sites licensed by the NRC or Agreement States in or after 1978. In FY 2010, 35 percent of the total annual fee amount, less $419,769 specifically budgeted for Title I activities, is allocated to DOE’s UMTRCA facilities. The budgeted resources for Title I activities increased in FY 2010 primarily due to additional Title I sites. The remaining 65 percent of the total annual fee (less the amounts PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 specifically budgeted for Title I activities) is allocated to other licensees. This is the same as in FY 2009. The remaining $317,000 (rounded) would be recovered through annual fees assessed to the other licensees in this fee class (i.e., conventional uranium mills and heap leach facilities, uranium solution mining and resin in-situ recovery (ISR) facilities, mill tailings disposal facilities (11e.(2) disposal facilities), and uranium water treatment facilities). The annual fee being assessed to DOE includes recovery of the costs specifically budgeted for NRC’s Title I activities, plus 35 percent of the remaining annual fee amount, including the fee-relief and generic/other costs, for the uranium recovery class. The remaining 65 percent of the fee-relief and generic/other costs are assessed to the other NRC licensees in this fee class that are subject to annual fees. The costs to be recovered through annual fees assessed to the uranium recovery class are shown in Table X. E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11384 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE X—COSTS RECOVERED THROUGH ANNUAL FEES; URANIUM RECOVERY FEE CLASS DOE Annual Fee Amount (UMTRCA Title I and Title II) general licenses: UMTRCA Title I budgeted costs .............................................................................................................................................. 35 percent of generic/other uranium recovery budgeted costs ............................................................................................... 35 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief adjustment ............................................................................................................. $419,769 151,950 +18,533 Total Annual Fee Amount for DOE (rounded) .................................................................................................................. Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium Recovery Licenses: 65 percent of generic/other uranium recovery budgeted costs less the amounts specifically budgeted for Title I activities 65 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief adjustment ............................................................................................................. 282,193 +34,419 Total Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium Recovery Licenses ................................................................................... $316,612 The NRC will continue to use a matrix (which is included in the supporting work papers) to determine the level of effort associated with conducting the generic regulatory actions for the different (non-DOE) licensees in this fee class. The weights derived in this matrix are used to allocate the approximately $317,000 annual fee amount to these licensees. The use of this uranium recovery annual fee matrix was established in the FY 1995 final fee rule (60 FR 32217; June 20, 1995). The FY 2010 matrix is described as follows. First, the methodology identifies the categories of licenses included in this fee class (besides DOE). In FY 2010, these categories are conventional uranium mills and heap leach facilities, uranium solution mining and resin ISR facilities, mill tailings disposal facilities (11e.(2) disposal facilities), and uranium water treatment facilities. Second, the matrix identifies the types of operating activities that support and benefit these licensees. In FY 2010, the activities related to generic decommissioning/reclamation are not included in the matrix, because they are included in the fee-relief activities. Therefore, they are not a factor in determining annual fees. The activities included in the FY 2010 matrix are operations, waste operations, and groundwater protection. The relative weight of each type of activity is then determined, based on the regulatory resources associated with each activity. The operations, waste operations, and groundwater protection activities have weights of 0, 5, and 10, respectively, in the FY 2010 matrix. Each year, the NRC determines the level of benefit to each licensee for generic uranium recovery program activities for each type of generic activity in the matrix. This is done by assigning, for each fee category, separate benefit factors for each type of 590,000 regulatory activity in the matrix. Benefit factors are assigned on a scale of 0 to 10 as follows: Zero (no regulatory benefit), five (moderate regulatory benefit), and ten (high regulatory benefit). These benefit factors are first multiplied by the relative weight assigned to each activity (described previously). Total benefit factors by fee category, and per licensee in each fee category, are then calculated. These benefit factors thus reflect the relative regulatory benefit associated with each licensee and fee category. The NRC expects to license an In Situ Recovery Resin Facility in FY 2010. Therefore, the benefit factors for fee category 2.A.(2)(d) have been included in the FY 2010 matrix, and an annual fee has been established. The benefit factors per licensee and per fee category, for each of the nonDOE fee categories included in the uranium recovery fee class, are as follows: TABLE XI—BENEFIT FACTORS FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSES Number of licensees Fee category Conventional and Heap Leach mills ................................................................................ Basic In Situ Recovery facilities ...................................................................................... Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities ............................................................................... In Situ Recovery Resin Facilities ..................................................................................... 11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites ........................................................ Uranium water treatment ................................................................................................. The annual fee per licensee is calculated by dividing the total allocated budgeted resources for the fee category by the number of licensees in that fee category, as summarized in Table XII. Applying these factors to the approximately $317,000 in budgeted costs to be recovered from non-DOE Benefit factor per licensee 1 5 1 1 1 1 200 190 215 180 65 45 Total value Benefit factor percent total 200 950 215 180 65 45 12 57 13 11 4 3 uranium recovery licensees results in the following annual fees for FY 2010: TABLE XII—ANNUAL FEES FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSEES erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 [Other than DOE] Facility type (fee category) FY 2010 annual fee Conventional and Heap Leach mills (2.A.(2)(a)) ................................................................................................................................. Basic In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(b)) ....................................................................................................................................... Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(c)) ................................................................................................................................ In Situ Recovery Resin facilities (2.A.(2)(d)) ....................................................................................................................................... 11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites (2.A.(4)) .............................................................................................................. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 $38,300 36,300 41,100 34,400 12,400 11385 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE XII—ANNUAL FEES FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSEES—Continued [Other than DOE] Facility type (fee category) FY 2010 annual fee Uranium water treatment (2.A.(5)) ....................................................................................................................................................... c. Operating Power Reactors The $475.9 million in budgeted costs to be recovered through FY 2010 annual fees assessed to the power reactor class was calculated as shown in Table XIII. 8,600 FY 2009 values are shown for comparison. TABLE XIII—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR OPERATING POWER REACTORS [Dollars in millions] Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final FY 2010 proposed Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $761.5 ¥288.8 $787.3 ¥318.7 Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge ..................................................................................................................... Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... $472.7 +0.9 ¥1.6 ¥3.6 $468.6 +0.8 +7.5 ¥1.0 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. $468.3 $475.9 The budgeted costs to be recovered through annual fees to power reactors are divided equally among the 104 power reactors licensed to operate. This results in a FY 2010 annual fee of $4,576,000 per reactor, of which approximately $72,300 is the fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge. Additionally, each power reactor licensed to operate would be assessed the FY 2010 spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning annual fee of $143,000. This results in a total FY 2010 annual fee of $4,719,000 for each power reactor licensed to operate. The annual fee for power reactors is higher in FY 2010 than in FY 2009, primarily due to increased budgeted resources for licensing, international, oversight, and new reactor activities, and the increased fee-relief adjustment, which was a reduction in FY 2009. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in budgeted resources for incident response activities and higher estimated part 170 collections. The annual fees for power reactors are presented in § 171.15. d. Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning For FY 2010, budgeted costs of approximately $17.6 million for spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning are to be recovered through annual fees assessed to 10 CFR part 50 power reactors, and to part 72 licensees who do not hold a part 50 license. Those reactor licensees that have ceased operations and have no fuel onsite are not subject to these annual fees. Table XIV shows the calculation of this annual fee amount. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison. TABLE XIV—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR THE SPENT FUEL STORAGE/REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING FEE CLASS [Dollars in millions] FY 2009 Final Summary fee calculations FY 2010 Proposed $21.1 ¥6.1 $24.1 ¥7.0 Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment ............................................................................................................................................... Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $15.0 +0.2 ¥0.1 ¥0.1 $17.1 +0.4 +0.2 0.0 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. $15.1 $17.6 The required annual fee recovery amount is divided equally among 123 licensees, resulting in a FY 2010 annual fee of $143,000 per licensee. The value of total budgeted resources for this fee VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 class is higher in FY 2010 than in FY 2009, due to increased budgeted resources for information technology and legal support and for spent fuel storage licensing and certification PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 activities. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in reactor decommissioning inspection and licensing activities. E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11386 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules e. Test and Research Reactors (Nonpower Reactors) Approximately $330,000 in budgeted costs is to be recovered through annual fees assessed to the test and research reactor class of licenses for FY 2010. Table XV summarizes the annual fee calculation for test and research reactors for FY 2010. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison. TABLE XV—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS [Dollars in millions] FY 2009 Final Summary fee calculations FY 2010 Proposed Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... $1.22 ¥0.87 $0.35 $1.31 ¥1.01 $0.30 Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment ............................................................................................................................................... Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... +0.01 ¥0.00 ¥0.01 +0.02 +0.01 ¥0.00 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. $0.35 $0.33 This required annual fee recovery amount is divided equally among the four test and research reactors subject to annual fees and results in a FY 2010 annual fee of $81,800 for each licensee. The decrease in annual fees from FY 2009 to FY 2010 is due to a higher part 170 revenue estimate for license renewal activity. f. Rare Earth Facilities The agency does not anticipate receiving an application for a rare earth facility this fiscal year, so no budget resources are allocated to this fee class, and no annual fee will be published in FY 2010. g. Materials Users Table XVI shows the calculation of the FY 2010 annual fee amount for materials users licensees. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison. Note the following fee categories under § 171.16 are included in this fee class: 1.C., 1.D., 2.B., 2.C., 3.A. through 3.S., 4.A. through 4.C., 5.A., 5.B., 6.A., 7.A. through 7.C., 8.A., 9.A. through 9.D., 16, and 17. TABLE XVI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR MATERIALS USERS [Dollars in millions] FY 2009 Final Summary fee calculations FY 2010 Proposed $28.7 ¥1.7 $ 28.8 ¥1.8 Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... Allocated generic transportation .............................................................................................................................. Fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge ..................................................................................................................... Billing adjustments ................................................................................................................................................... $27.0 +0.8 +0.6 ¥0.1 $27.0 +0.8 +0.9 ¥0.0 Total required annual fee recovery .................................................................................................................. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $28.4 $28.7 The total required annual fees to be recovered from materials licensees increases in FY 2010, mainly because of increases in the budgeted resources allocated to this fee class for legal support, information technology support, and enforcement activities. This is partially offset by a decrease in budgeted resources for licensing activities and higher estimated part 170 revenue resulting from the higher FY 2009 fees. Annual fees for all fee categories within the materials users fee class increase. The number of licensees decreased because of the transfer of licensees to the State of New Jersey, which became an Agreement State on September 30, 2009. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 To equitably and fairly allocate the $28.7 million in FY 2010 budgeted costs to be recovered in annual fees assessed to the approximately 3,150 diverse materials users licensees, the NRC will continue to base the annual fees for each fee category within this class on the part 170 application fees and estimated inspection costs for each fee category. Because the application fees and inspection costs are indicative of the complexity of the license, this approach continues to provide a proxy for allocating the generic and other regulatory costs to the diverse categories of licenses based on the NRC’s cost to regulate each category. This fee calculation also continues to consider the inspection frequency (priority), PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 which is indicative of the safety risk and resulting regulatory costs associated with the categories of licenses. The annual fee for these categories of materials users licenses is developed as follows: Annual fee = Constant × [Application Fee + (Average Inspection Cost divided by Inspection Priority)] + Inspection Multiplier × (Average Inspection Cost divided by Inspection Priority) + Unique Category Costs. The constant is the multiple necessary to recover approximately $20 million in general costs (including allocated generic transportation costs) and is 1.5 for FY 2010. The average inspection cost is the average inspection hours for each fee category multiplied by the hourly rate of $259. The inspection priority is E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules the interval between routine inspections, expressed in years. The inspection multiplier is the multiple necessary to recover approximately $7.6 million in inspection costs, and is 2.2 for FY 2010. The unique category costs are any special costs that the NRC has budgeted for a specific category of licenses. For FY 2010, approximately $107,500 in budgeted costs for the implementation of revised 10 CFR part 35, Medical Use of Byproduct Material (unique costs) has been allocated to holders of NRC human use licenses. The annual fee to be assessed to each licensee also includes a share of the feerelief adjustment of approximately $187,000 allocated to the materials users fee class (see Section II.B.1., ‘‘Application of Fee-Relief and LowLevel Waste Surcharge,’’ of this document), and for certain categories of these licensees, a share of the 11387 approximately $719,000 in LLW surcharge costs allocated to the fee class. The annual fee for each fee category is shown in § 171.16(d). h. Transportation Table XVII shows the calculation of the FY 2010 generic transportation budgeted resources to be recovered through annual fees. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison. TABLE XVII—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION [Dollars in millions] FY 2009 Final Summary fee calculations FY 2010 Proposed Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................ Less estimated part 170 receipts ............................................................................................................................ $6.1 ¥2.9 $6.6 ¥3.2 Net part 171 resources ..................................................................................................................................... $3.1 $3.4 The NRC must approve any package used for shipping nuclear material before shipment. If the package meets NRC requirements, the NRC issues a Radioactive Material Package Certificate of Compliance (CoC) to the organization requesting approval of a package. Organizations are authorized to ship radioactive material in a package approved for use under the general licensing provisions of 10 CFR part 71. The resources associated with generic transportation activities are distributed to the license fee classes based on the number of CoCs benefitting (used by) that fee class, as a proxy for the generic transportation resources expended for each fee class. The total FY 2010 budgeted resources for generic transportation activities, including those to support DOE CoCs, are $3.4 million. The budgeted resources for these activities are higher in FY 2010 than in FY 2009, mostly due to an increase in budgeted resources for homeland security safeguards, licensing, and certification activities. Generic transportation resources associated with fee-exempt entities are not included in this total. These costs are included in the appropriate fee-relief category (e.g., the fee-relief category for nonprofit educational institutions). Consistent with the policy established in the NRC’s FY 2006 final fee rule (71 FR 30721; May 30, 2006), the NRC will recover generic transportation costs unrelated to DOE as part of existing annual fees for license fee classes. The NRC will continue to assess a separate annual fee under § 171.16, fee category 18.A., for DOE transportation activities. The amount of the allocated generic resources is calculated by multiplying the percentage of total CoCs used by each fee class (and DOE) by the total generic transportation resources to be recovered. In FY 2010, the generic transportation cost allocated to most fee classes is higher than the FY 2009 cost, due to the increase in total budgeted resources allocated for transportation. The distribution of these resources to the license fee classes and DOE is shown in Table XVIII. The distribution is adjusted to account for the licensees in each fee class that are fee-exempt. For example, if 3 CoCs benefit the entire test and research reactor class, but only 4 of 32 test and research reactors are subject to annual fees, the number of CoCs used to determine the proportion of generic transportation resources allocated to test and research reactor annual fees equals ((4/32)*3), or 0.4 CoCs. TABLE XVIII—DISTRIBUTION OF GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES, FY 2010 [Dollars in millions] Number CoCs benefiting fee class or DOE erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 License fee class/DOE Percentage of total CoCs Allocated generic transportation resources 82.7 21.0 19.0 9.0 0.4 13.0 20.3 100.0 25.4 23.0 10.9 0.5 15.7 24.5 $3.38 0.86 0.78 0.37 0.02 0.53 0.83 Total ............................................................................................................................................. DOE ............................................................................................................................................. Operating Power Reactors .......................................................................................................... Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning .......................................................................... Test and Research Reactors ....................................................................................................... Fuel Facilities ............................................................................................................................... Materials Users ............................................................................................................................ The NRC is proposing to continue to assess an annual fee to DOE based on the part 71 CoCs it holds and not allocate these DOE-related resources to other licensees’ annual fees, because VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 these resources specifically support DOE. Note that DOE’s proposed annual fee includes an increase for the fee-relief adjustment (see Section II.B.1, ‘‘Application of Fee-Relief and Low- PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Level Waste Surcharge,’’ of this document), resulting in a total annual fee of $886,000 for FY 2010. This fee increase from last year is primarily due to an increase in budgeted resources for E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11388 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules transportation activities and a higher percentage of the total number of CoCs. 4. Administrative Amendments The NRC is updating some of the program codes found next to the materials users fee categories in § 171.16. The program codes were added in the FY 2008 final rule and the NRC plans to update the program codes as needed. In addition, the NRC is editing footnote 4 in § 171.16 to use the same descriptive language that is used for fee category 2.A(f) ‘‘Other facilities’’ that footnote 4 references. This does not change the meaning of footnote 4 but provides consistency. In summary, the NRC is proposing to— 1. Recover the NRC’s fee-relief shortfall by increasing all licensees’ annual fees, based on their percent of the NRC budget; 2. Revise the number of NRC licensees to reflect that the State of New Jersey became an Agreement State effective September 30, 2009; 3. Establish rebaselined annual fees for FY 2010; and 4. Make certain administrative changes for purposes of updating some program codes and providing rule consistency. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 III. Plain Language The Presidential Memorandum dated June 1, 1998, entitled ‘‘Plain Language in Government Writing,’’ directed that the Government’s writing be in plain language. This memorandum was published on June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC requests specific comments on the clarity and effectiveness of the language in the proposed rule. Comments should be sent to the address listed under the ADDRESSES heading. IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 3701) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies, unless using these standards is inconsistent with applicable law or is otherwise impractical. The NRC is proposing to amend the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its licensees and applicants as necessary to recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in FY 2010, as required by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended. This action does not constitute the establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable requirements. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 V. Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion The NRC has determined that this proposed rule is the type of action described in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement has been prepared for the proposed rule. By its very nature, this regulatory action does not affect the environment and, therefore, no environmental justice issues are raised. VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement This proposed rule does not contain information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement, unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number. VII. Regulatory Analysis With respect to 10 CFR part 170, this proposed rule was developed under Title V of the IOAA (31 U.S.C. 9701) and the Commission’s fee guidelines. When developing these guidelines, the Commission took into account guidance provided by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 4, 1974, in National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 36 (1974) and Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Company, 415 U.S. 345 (1974). In these decisions, the Court held that the IOAA authorizes an agency to charge fees for special benefits rendered to identifiable persons measured by the ‘‘value to the recipient’’ of the agency service. The meaning of the IOAA was further clarified on December 16, 1976 by four decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia: National Cable Television Association v. Federal Communications Commission, 554 F.2d 1094 (DC Cir. 1976); National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission, 554 F.2d 1118 (DC Cir. 1976); Electronic Industries Association v. Federal Communications Commission, 554 F.2d 1109 (DC Cir. 1976); and Capital Cities Communication, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 554 F.2d 1135 (DC Cir. 1976). The Commission’s fee guidelines were developed based on these legal decisions. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 The Commission’s fee guidelines were upheld on August 24, 1979, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Mississippi Power and Light Co. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). This court held that— (1) The NRC had the authority to recover the full cost of providing services to identifiable beneficiaries; (2) The NRC could properly assess a fee for the costs of providing routine inspections necessary to ensure a licensee’s compliance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and with applicable regulations; (3) The NRC could charge for costs incurred in conducting environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321); (4) The NRC properly included the costs of uncontested hearings and of administrative and technical support services in the fee schedule; (5) The NRC could assess a fee for renewing a license to operate a lowlevel radioactive waste burial site; and (6) The NRC’s fees were not arbitrary or capricious. With respect to 10 CFR part 171, on November 5, 1990, the Congress passed OBRA–90, which required that, for FYs 1991 through 1995, approximately 100 percent of the NRC budget authority, less appropriations from the NWF, be recovered through the assessment of fees. OBRA–90 was subsequently amended to extend the 100 percent fee recovery requirement through FY 2000. The FY 2001 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (EWDAA) amended OBRA–90 to decrease the NRC’s fee recovery amount by 2 percent per year beginning in FY 2001, until the fee recovery amount was 90 percent in FY 2005. The FY 2006 EWDAA extended this 90 percent fee recovery requirement for FY 2006. Section 637 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 made the 90 percent fee recovery requirement permanent in FY 2007. As a result, the NRC is required to recover approximately 90 percent of its FY 2010 budget authority, less the amounts appropriated from the NWF, WIR, and generic homeland security activities through fees. To comply with this statutory requirement and in accordance with § 171.13, the NRC is publishing the amount of the FY 2010 annual fees for reactor licensees, fuel cycle licensees, materials licensees, and holders of CoCs, registrations of sealed source and devices, and Government agencies. OBRA–90, consistent with the accompanying Conference Committee E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11389 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules Report, and the amendments to OBRA– 90, provides that— (1) The annual fees will be based on approximately 90 percent of the Commission’s FY 2010 budget of $1,066.9 million less the funds directly appropriated from the NWF to cover the NRC’s high-level waste program, and for WIR, generic homeland security activities, and less the amount of funds collected from part 170 fees; (2) The annual fees shall, to the maximum extent practicable, have a reasonable relationship to the cost of regulatory services provided by the Commission; and (3) The annual fees be assessed to those licensees the Commission, in its discretion, determines can fairly, equitably, and practicably contribute to their payment. Part 171, which established annual fees for operating power reactors, effective October 20, 1986 (51 FR 33224; September 18, 1986), was challenged and upheld in its entirety in Florida Power and Light Company v. United States, 846 F.2d 765 (DC Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1045 (1989). Further, the NRC’s FY 1991 annual fee rule methodology was upheld by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals in Allied Signal v. NRC, 988 F.2d 146 (DC Cir. 1993). decreases include those that qualify as a small entity under NRC’s size standards in 10 CFR 2.810. The Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, prepared in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, is included as Appendix A to this proposed rule. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) requires all Federal agencies to prepare a written compliance guide for each rule for which the agency is required by 5 U.S.C. 604 to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis. Therefore, in compliance with the law, Attachment 1 to the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is the small entity compliance guide for FY 2010. VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The NRC is required by the OBRA–90, as amended, to recover approximately 90 percent of its FY 2010 budget authority through the assessment of user fees. This Act further requires that the NRC establish a schedule of charges that fairly and equitably allocates the aggregate amount of these charges among licensees. This proposed rule would establish the schedules of fees that are necessary to implement the Congressional mandate for FY 2010. This rule would result in increases in the annual fees charged to certain licensees and holders of certificates, registrations, and approvals, and in decreases in annual fees charged to others. Licensees affected by the annual fee increases and 10 CFR Part 170 Byproduct material, Import and export licenses, Intergovernmental relations, Non-payment penalties, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Source material, Special nuclear material. IX. Backfit Analysis The NRC has determined that the backfit rule, 10 CFR 50.109, does not apply to this proposed rule and that a backfit analysis is not required for this proposed rule. The backfit analysis is not required because these amendments do not require the modification of, or additions to, systems, structures, components, or the design of a facility, or the design approval or manufacturing license for a facility, or the procedures or organization required to design, construct, or operate a facility. List of Subjects 10 CFR Part 171 Annual charges, Byproduct material, Holders of certificates, Registrations, Approvals, Intergovernmental relations, Non-payment penalties, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Source material, Special nuclear material. For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552, the NRC is proposing to adopt the following amendments to 10 CFR parts 170 and 171. PART 170—FEES FOR FACILITIES, MATERIALS, IMPORT AND EXPORT LICENSES, AND OTHER REGULATORY SERVICES UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED 1. The authority citation for part 170 continues to read as follows: Authority: Section 9701, Pub. L. 97–258, 96 Stat. 1051 (31 U.S.C. 9701); sec. 301, Pub. L. 92–314, 86 Stat. 227 (42 U.S.C. 2201w); sec. 201, Pub. L. 93–438, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); sec. 205a, Pub. L. 101–576, 104 Stat. 2842, as amended (31 U.S.C. 901, 902); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note), sec. 623, Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 783 (42 U.S.C. 2201(w)); sec. 651(e), Pub. L.109–58, 119 Stat. 806–810 (42 U.S.C. 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111). 2. In § 170.11, the introductory text of paragraph (a)(1), is revised to read as follows: § 170.11 Exemptions. (a) * * * (1) A special project that is a request/ report submitted to the NRC— * * * * * 3. Section 170.20 is revised to read as follows: § 170.20 Average cost per professional staff-hour. Fees for permits, licenses, amendments, renewals, special projects, 10 CFR part 55 re-qualification and replacement examinations and tests, other required reviews, approvals, and inspections under ’’ 170.21 and 170.31 will be calculated using the professional staff-hour rate of $259 per hour. 4. In § 170.21, in the table, fee category K is revised to read as follows: § 170.21 Schedule of fees for production and utilization facilities, review of standard referenced design approvals, special projects, inspections, and import and export licenses. * * * * * SCHEDULE OF FACILITY FEES [See footnotes at end of table] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Facility categories and type of fees Fees 1 2 * * * * * * K. Import and export licenses: Licenses for the import and export only of production and utilization facilities or the export only of components for production and utilization facilities issued under 10 CFR part 110. 1. Application for import or export of production and utilization facilities 4 (including reactors and other facilities) and exports of components requiring Commission and Executive Branch review, for example, actions under 10 CFR 110.40(b). Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ................................................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 * $16,900 11390 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF FACILITY FEES—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Facility categories and type of fees Fees 1 2 2. Application for export of reactor and other components requiring Executive Branch review only, for example, those actions under 10 CFR 110.41(a)(1)–(8). Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ................................................................................... 3. Application for export of components requiring the assistance of the Executive Branch to obtain foreign government assurances. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ................................................................................... 4. Application for export of facility components and equipment (examples provided in 10 CFR part 110, Appendix A, Items (5) through (9)) not requiring Commission or Executive Branch review, or obtaining foreign government assurances. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ................................................................................... 5. Minor amendment of any active export or import license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms or conditions or to the type of facility or component authorized for export and therefore, do not require in-depth analysis or review or consultation with the Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign government authorities. Minor amendment to license ........................................................................................................................................................ 9,900 4,200 2,600 780 1 Fees will not be charged for orders related to civil penalties or other civil sanctions issued by the Commission under § 2.202 of this chapter or for amendments resulting specifically from the requirements of these orders. For orders unrelated to civil penalties or other civil sanctions, fees will be charged for any resulting licensee-specific activities not otherwise exempted from fees under this chapter. Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption provision of the Commission’s regulations under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 73.5) and any other sections in effect now or in the future, regardless of whether the approval is in the form of a license amendment, letter of approval, safety evaluation report, or other form. 2 Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff time and appropriate contractual support services expended. For applications currently on file and for which fees are determined based on the full cost expended for the review, the professional staff hours expended for the review of the application up to the effective date of the final rule will be determined at the professional rates in effect when the service was provided. For those applications currently on file for which review costs have reached an applicable fee ceiling established by the June 20, 1984 and July 2, 1990 rules, but are still pending completion of the review, the cost incurred after any applicable ceiling was reached through January 29, 1989 will not be billed to the applicant. Any professional staff-hours expended above those ceilings on or after January 30, 1989 will be assessed at the applicable rates established by § 170.20, as appropriate, except for topical reports whose costs exceed $50,000. Costs which exceed $50,000 for any topical report, amendment, revision or supplement to a topical report completed or under review from January 30, 1989 through August 8, 1991 will not be billed to the applicant. Any professional hours expended on or after August 9, 1991 will be assessed at the applicable rate established in § 170.20. * * * * * * * 4 Imports only of major components for end-use at NRC-licensed reactors are now authorized under NRC general import license. 5. In § 170.31, the table is revised to read as follows: § 170.31 Schedule of fees for materials licenses and other regulatory services, including inspections and import and export licenses. * * * * * SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES [See footnotes at end of table] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1 Fee 2 3 1. Special nuclear material: A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of U–235 or plutonium for fuel fabrication activities. (a) Strategic Special Nuclear Material (High Enriched Uranium) [Program Code(s): 21130] ................................................ (b) Low Enriched Uranium in Dispersible Form Used for Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel [Program Code(s): 21210] ... (2) All other special nuclear materials licenses not included in Category 1.A.(1) which are licensed for fuel cycle activities. (a) Facilities with limited operations [Program Code(s): 21310, 21320] ................................................................................. (b) Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration facilities ........................................................................................................... (c) Others, including hot cell facilities ...................................................................................................................................... B. Licenses for receipt and storage of spent fuel and reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) [Program Code(s): 23200]. C. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in devices used in industrial measuring systems, including x-ray fluorescence analyzers.4 Application [Program Code(s): 22140] .................................................................................................................................... D. All other special nuclear material licenses, except licenses authorizing special nuclear material in unsealed form in combination that would constitute a critical quantity, as defined in § 150.11 of this chapter, for which the licensee shall pay the same fees as those under Category 1.A.4 Application [Program Code(s): 22110, 22111, 22120, 22131, 22136, 22150, 22151, 22161, 22163, 22170, 23100, 23300, 23310]. E. Licenses or certificates for construction and operation of a uranium enrichment facility [Program Code(s): 21200] .............. 2. Source material: A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of source material for refining uranium mill concentrates to uranium hexafluoride [Program Code(s): 11400]. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Full Cost. Full Cost. Full Full Full Full Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. $1,200. $2,400. Full Cost. Full Cost. 11391 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1 Fee 2 3 (2) Licenses for possession and use of source material in recovery operations such as milling, in-situ recovery, heap-leaching, ore buying stations, ion-exchange facilities, and in processing of ores containing source material for extraction of metals other than uranium or thorium, including licenses authorizing the possession of byproduct waste material (tailings) from source material recovery operations, as well as licenses authorizing the possession and maintenance of a facility in a standby mode. (a) Conventional and Heap Leach facilities [Program Code(s): 11100] ................................................................................. (b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities [Program Code(s): 11500] ............................................................................................. (c) Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities [Program Code(s): 11510] ...................................................................................... (d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities [Program Code(s): 11550] ............................................................................................. (e) Resin Toll Milling facilities [Program Code(s): 11555] ....................................................................................................... (f) Other facilities [Program Code(s): 11700] .......................................................................................................................... (3) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for possession and disposal, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) or Category 2.A.(4) [Program Code(s): 11600, 12000]. (4) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for possession and disposal incidental to the disposal of the uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee’s milling operations, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) [Program Code(s): 12010]. (5) Licenses that authorize the possession of source material related to removal of contaminants (source material) from drinking water [Program Code(s): 11820]. B. Licenses which authorize the possession, use, and/or installation of source material for shielding. Application [Program Code(s): 11210] .................................................................................................................................... C. All other source material licenses. Application [Program Code(s): 11200, 11220, 11221, 11230, 11300, 11800, 11810] ........................................................... 3. Byproduct material: A. Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Application [Program Code(s): 03211, 03212, 03213] ............................................................................................................ B. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Application [Program Code(s): 03214, 03215, 22135, 22162] ................................................................................................ C. Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). These licenses are covered by fee Category 3.D. Application [Program Code(s): 02500, 02511, 02513] ............................................................................................................ D. Licenses and approvals issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter authorizing distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources or devices not involving processing of byproduct material. This category includes licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Application [Program Code(s): 02512, 02514] ........................................................................................................................ E. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is not removed from its shield (self-shielded units). Application [Program Code(s): 03510, 03520] ........................................................................................................................ F. Licenses for possession and use of less than 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators for irradiation of materials where the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes. Application [Program Code(s): 03511] .................................................................................................................................... G. Licenses for possession and use of 10,000 curies or more of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators for irradiation of materials where the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes. Application [Program Code(s): 03521] .................................................................................................................................... H. Licenses issued under Subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require device review to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter. The category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter. Application [Program Code(s): 03254, 03255] ........................................................................................................................ I. Licenses issued under Subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities of byproduct material that do not require device evaluation to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter. This category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter. Application [Program Code(s): 03250, 03251, 03252, 03253, 03256] ................................................................................... J. Licenses issued under Subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. This category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. Application [Program Code(s): 03240, 03241, 03243] ............................................................................................................ K. Licenses issued under Subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities of byproduct material that do not require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. This category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. Full Cost. Full Cost. $570. $10,200. $12,100. $4,600. $6,600. $4,400. $3,000. $6,100. $29,000. $5,500. $10,100. $1,900. 11392 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1 4. 5. 6. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 7. 8. Fee 2 3 Application [Program Code(s): 03242, 03244] ........................................................................................................................ L. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Application [Program Code(s): 01100, 01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612, 03613] ........................................................... M. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Application [Program Code(s): 03620] .................................................................................................................................... N. Licenses that authorize services for other licensees, except: (1) Licenses that authorize only calibration and/or leak testing services are subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3.P.; and (2) Licenses that authorize waste disposal services are subject to the fees specified in fee Categories 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C. Application [Program Code(s): 03219, 03225, 03226] ............................................................................................................ O. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. Application [Program Code(s): 03310, 03320] ........................................................................................................................ P. All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D. Application [Program Code(s): 02400, 02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123, 03124, 03220, 03221, 03222, 03800, 03810, 22130]. Q. Registration of a device(s) generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. Registration .............................................................................................................................................................................. R. Possession of items or products containing radium-226 identified in 10 CFR 31.12 which exceed the number of items or limits specified in that section.6 1. Possession of quantities exceeding the number of items or limits in 10 CFR 31.12(a)(4), or (5) but less than or equal to 10 times the number of items or limits specified. Application [Program Code(s): 02700] .................................................................................................................................... 2. Possession of quantities exceeding 10 times the number of items or limits specified in 10 CFR 31.12(a)(4), or (5). Application [Program Code(s): 02710] .................................................................................................................................... S. Licenses for production of accelerator-produced radionuclides. Application [Program Code(s): 03210] .................................................................................................................................... Waste disposal and processing: A. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons for the purpose of contingency storage or commercial land disposal by the licensee; or licenses authorizing contingency storage of low-level radioactive waste at the site of nuclear power reactors; or licenses for receipt of waste from other persons for incineration or other treatment, packaging of resulting waste and residues, and transfer of packages to another person authorized to receive or dispose of waste material. [Program Code(s): 03231, 03233, 03235, 03236, 06100, 06101]. B. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons for the purpose of packaging or repackaging the material. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material. Application [Program Code(s): 03234] .................................................................................................................................... C. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of prepackaged waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material. Application [Program Code(s): 03232] .................................................................................................................................... Well logging: A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material for well logging, well surveys, and tracer studies other than field flooding tracer studies. Application [Program Code(s): 03110, 03111, 03112] ............................................................................................................ B. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material for field flooding tracer studies. Licensing [Program Code(s): 03113] ....................................................................................................................................... Nuclear laundries: A. Licenses for commercial collection and laundry of items contaminated with byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material. Application [Program Code(s): 03218] .................................................................................................................................... Medical licenses: A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices, or similar beam therapy devices. Application [Program Code(s): 02300, 02310] ........................................................................................................................ B. Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license. Application [Program Code(s): 02110] .................................................................................................................................... C. Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. Application [Program Code(s): 02120, 02121, 02200, 02201, 02210, 02220, 02230, 02231, 02240, 22160] ...................... Civil defense: VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 $1,100. $10,200. $3,500. $6,100. $5,800. $1,400. $320. $1,190. $1,400. $6,600. Full Cost. $4,500. $4,700. $3,400. Full Cost. $20,700. $11,300. $8,100. $2,300. 11393 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1 Fee 2 3 A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material for civil defense activities. Application [Program Code(s): 03710] .................................................................................................................................... 9. Device, product, or sealed source safety evaluation: A. Safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except reactor fuel devices, for commercial distribution. Application—each device ........................................................................................................................................................ B. Safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel devices. Application—each device ........................................................................................................................................................ C. Safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except reactor fuel, for commercial distribution. Application—each source ........................................................................................................................................................ D. Safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel. Application—each source ........................................................................................................................................................ 10. Transportation of radioactive material: A. Evaluation of casks, packages, and shipping containers. 1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and plutonium air packages .............................................................................................. 2. Other Casks ......................................................................................................................................................................... B. Quality assurance program approvals issued under part 71 of this chapter. 1. Users and Fabricators. Application ........................................................................................................................................................................ Inspections ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2. Users. Application ........................................................................................................................................................................ Inspections ........................................................................................................................................................................ C. Evaluation of security plans, route approvals, route surveys, and transportation security devices (including immobilization devices). 11. Review of standardized spent fuel facilities .................................................................................................................................... 12. Special projects: Including approvals, preapplication/licensing activities, and inspections ....................................................................................... 13. A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Compliance ..................................................................................................................... B. Inspections related to storage of spent fuel under § 72.210 of this chapter ............................................................................. 14. A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear material licenses and other approvals authorizing decommissioning, decontamination, reclamation, or site restoration activities under parts 30, 40, 70, 72, and 76 of this chapter. B. Site-specific decommissioning activities associated with unlicensed sites, regardless of whether or not the sites have been previously licensed. 15. Import and Export licenses: Licenses issued under part 110 of this chapter for the import and export only of special nuclear material, source material, tritium and other byproduct material, and the export only of heavy water, or nuclear grade graphite (fee categories 15.A. through 15.E.). A. Application for export or import of nuclear materials, including radioactive waste requiring Commission and Executive Branch review, for example, those actions under 10 CFR 110.40(b). Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... B. Application for export or import of nuclear material, including radioactive waste, requiring Executive Branch review, but not Commission review. This category includes applications for the export and import of radioactive waste and requires NRC to consult with domestic host state authorities (i.e.,Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Commission, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, etc.). Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... C. Application for export of nuclear material, for example, routine reloads of low enriched uranium reactor fuel and/or natural uranium source material requiring the assistance of the Executive Branch to obtain foreign government assurances. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... D. Application for export or import of nuclear material, including radioactive waste, not requiring Commission or Executive Branch review, or obtaining foreign government assurances. This category includes applications for export or import of radioactive waste where the NRC has previously authorized the export or import of the same form of waste to or from the same or similar parties located in the same country, requiring only confirmation from the receiving facility and licensing authorities that the shipments may proceed according to previously agreed understandings and procedures. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... E. Minor amendment of any active export or import license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms and conditions or to the type/quantity/chemical composition of the material authorized for export and, therefore, do not require in-depth analysis, review, or consultations with other Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign government authorities. Minor amendment ............................................................................................................................................................. Licenses issued under part 110 of this chapter for the import and export only of Category 1 and Category 2 quantities of radioactive material listed in Appendix P to part 110 of this chapter (fee categories 15.F. through 15.R.).5 Category 1 Exports: F. Application for export of Category 1 materials involving an exceptional circumstances review under 10 CFR 110.42(e)(4). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 $1,190. $8,400. $8,400. $5,900. $990. Full Cost. Full Cost. $3,200. Full Cost. $3,200. Full Cost. Full Cost. Full Cost. Full Full Full Full Cost. Cost. Cost. Cost. Full Cost. $16,900. $9,900. $4,200. $2,600. $780. 11394 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1 Fee 2 3 Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... G. Application for export of Category 1 materials requiring Executive Branch review, Commission review, and/or government-to-government consent. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... H. Application for export of Category 1 materials requiring Commission review and government-to-government consent. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... I. Application for export of Category 1 material requiring government-to-government consent. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Category 2 Exports: J. Application for export of Category 2 materials involving an exceptional circumstances review under 10 CFR 110.42(e)(4). Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... K. Applications for export of Category 2 materials requiring Executive Branch review and/or Commission review. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... L. Application for the export of Category 2 materials. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Category 1 Imports: M. Application for the import of Category 1 material requiring Commission review. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... N. Application for the import of Category 1 material. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Category 2 Imports: O. Application for the import of Category 2 material. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Category 1 Imports with Agent and Multiple Licensees: P. Application for the import of Category 1 material with agent and multiple licensees requiring Commission review. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Q. Application for the import of Category 1 material with agent and multiple licensees. Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request ....................................................................... Minor Amendments (Category 1 and 2 Export and Imports): R. Minor amendment of any active export or import license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms and conditions or to the type/quantity/chemical composition of the material authorized for export and, therefore, do not require in-depth analysis, review, or consultations with other Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign authorities. Minor amendment ............................................................................................................................................................. 16. Reciprocity: Agreement State licensees who conduct activities under the reciprocity provisions of 10 CFR 150.20. Application ............................................................................................................................................................................... 17. Master materials licenses of broad scope issued to Government agencies. Application ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18. Department of Energy: A. Certificates of Compliance. Evaluation of casks, packages, and shipping containers (including spent fuel, high-level waste, and other casks, and plutonium air packages) B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) activities ............................................................................................ erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 1 Types $16,900. $9,900. $6,200. $5,200. $16,900. $9,900. $4,700. $4,900. $4,200. $3,600. $5,700. $4,700. $780. $1,900. $73,800. Full Cost. Full Cost. of fees—Separate charges, as shown in the schedule, will be assessed for pre-application consultations and reviews; applications for new licenses, approvals, or license terminations; possession-only licenses; issuances of new licenses and approvals; certain amendments and renewals to existing licenses and approvals; safety evaluations of sealed sources and devices; generally licensed device registrations; and certain inspections. The following guidelines apply to these charges: (a) Application and registration fees. Applications for new materials licenses and export and import licenses; applications to reinstate expired, terminated, or inactive licenses, except those subject to fees assessed at full costs; applications filed by Agreement State licensees to register under the general license provisions of 10 CFR 150.20; and applications for amendments to materials licenses that would place the license in a higher fee category or add a new fee category must be accompanied by the prescribed application fee for each category. (1) Applications for licenses covering more than one fee category of special nuclear material or source material must be accompanied by the prescribed application fee for the highest fee category. (2) Applications for new licenses that cover both byproduct material and special nuclear material in sealed sources for use in gauging devices will pay the appropriate application fee for fee Category 1.C. only. (b) Licensing fees. Fees for reviews of applications for new licenses, renewals, and amendments to existing licenses, pre-application consultations and other documents submitted to the NRC for review, and project manager time for fee categories subject to full cost fees are due upon notification by the Commission in accordance with § 170.12(b). (c) Amendment fees. Applications for amendments to export and import licenses must be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for each license affected. An application for an amendment to an export or import license or approval classified in more than one fee category must be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for the category affected by the amendment, unless the amendment is applicable to two or more fee categories, in which case the amendment fee for the highest fee category would apply. (d) Inspection fees. Inspections resulting from investigations conducted by the Office of Investigations and non-routine inspections that result from third-party allegations are not subject to fees. Inspection fees are due upon notification by the Commission in accordance with § 170.12(c). (e) Generally licensed device registrations under 10 CFR 31.5. Submittals of registration information must be accompanied by the prescribed fee. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 11395 2 Fees will not be charged for orders related to civil penalties or other civil sanctions issued by the Commission under 10 CFR 2.202 or for amendments resulting specifically from the requirements of these orders. For orders unrelated to civil penalties or other civil sanctions, fees will be charged for any resulting licensee-specific activities not otherwise exempted from fees under this chapter. Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption provision of the Commission’s regulations under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 30.11, 40.14, 70.14, 73.5, and any other sections in effect now or in the future), regardless of whether the approval is in the form of a license amendment, letter of approval, safety evaluation report, or other form. In addition to the fee shown, an applicant may be assessed an additional fee for sealed source and device evaluations as shown in Categories 9.A. through 9.D. 3 Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff time multiplied by the appropriate professional hourly rate established in § 170.20 in effect when the service is provided, and the appropriate contractual support services expended. For applications currently on file for which review costs have reached an applicable fee ceiling established by the June 20, 1984 and July 2, 1990 rules, but are still pending completion of the review, the cost incurred after any applicable ceiling was reached through January 29, 1989 will not be billed to the applicant. Any professional staff-hours expended above those ceilings on or after January 30, 1989 will be assessed at the applicable rates established by § 170.20, as appropriate, except for topical reports for which costs exceed $50,000. Costs which exceed $50,000 for each topical report, amendment, revision, or supplement to a topical report completed or under review from January 30, 1989 through August 8, 1991 will not be billed to the applicant. Any professional hours expended on or after August 9, 1991 will be assessed at the applicable rate established in § 170.20. 4 Licensees paying fees under Categories 1.A., 1.B., and 1.E. are not subject to fees under Categories 1.C. and 1.D. for sealed sources authorized in the same license, except for an application that deals only with the sealed sources authorized by the license. 5 For a combined import and export license application for material listed in Appendix P to part 110 of this chapter, only the higher of the two applicable fee amounts must be paid. 6 Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in this category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources are possessed for storage only.) PART 171—ANNUAL FEES FOR REACTOR LICENSES AND FUEL CYCLE LICENSES AND MATERIALS LICENSES, INCLUDING HOLDERS OF CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE, REGISTRATIONS, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM APPROVALS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY THE NRC. 6. The authority citation for part 171 continues to read as follows: Authority: Section 7601, Pub. L. 99–272, 100 Stat. 146, as amended by sec. 5601, Pub. L. 100–203, 101 Stat. 1330, as amended by sec. 3201, Pub. L. 101–239, 103 Stat. 2132, as amended by sec. 6101, Pub. L. 101–508, 104 Stat. 1388, as amended by sec. 2903a, Pub. L. 102–486, 106 Stat. 3125 (42 U.S.C. 2213, 2214), and as amended by Title IV, Pub. L. 109–103, 119 Stat. 2283 (42 U.S.C. 2214); sec. 301, Pub. L. 92–314, 86 Stat. 227 (42 U.S.C. 2201w); sec. 201, Pub. L. 93–438, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note), sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 806–810 (42 U.S.C. 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111). 7. In § 171.15, paragraph (b)(1), the introductory text of paragraph (b)(2), paragraph (c)(1), the introductory text of paragraph (c)(2) and the introductory text of paragraph (d)(1), and paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(3), and paragraph (e), are revised to read as follows: § 171.15 Annual fees: Reactor licenses and independent spent fuel storage licenses. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 * * * * * (b)(1) The FY 2010 annual fee for each operating power reactor which must be collected by September 30, 2010 is $4,719,000. (2) The FY 2010 annual fee is comprised of a base annual fee for power reactors licensed to operate, a base spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning annual fee, and associated additional charges (fee-relief adjustment). The activities comprising the spent storage/reactor VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 decommissioning base annual fee are shown in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section. The activities comprising the FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment are shown in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. The activities comprising the FY 2010 base annual fee for operating power reactors are as follows: * * * * * (c)(1) The FY 2010 annual fee for each power reactor holding a 10 CFR part 50 license that is in a decommissioning or possession-only status and has spent fuel onsite, and for each independent spent fuel storage 10 CFR part 72 licensee who does not hold a 10 CFR part 50 license, is $143,000. (2) The FY 2010 annual fee is comprised of a base spent fuel storage/ reactor decommissioning annual fee (which is also included in the operating power reactor annual fee shown in paragraph (b) of this section) and an additional charge (fee-relief adjustment). The activities comprising the FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment are shown in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. The activities comprising the FY 2010 spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning rebaselined annual fee are: * * * * * (d)(1) The fee-relief adjustment allocated to annual fees includes a surcharge for the activities listed in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, plus the amount remaining after total budgeted resources for the activities included in paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and (d)(1)(iii) of this section are reduced by the appropriations the NRC receives for these types of activities. If the NRC’s appropriations for these types of activities are greater than the budgeted resources for the activities included in paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and (d)(1)(iii) of this section for a given FY, annual fees will be reduced. The activities PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 comprising the FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment are as follows: * * * * * (2) The total FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment allocated to the operating power reactor class of licenses is $7.5 million, not including the amount allocated to the spent fuel storage/ reactor decommissioning class. The FY 2010 operating power reactor fee-relief adjustment to be assessed to each operating power reactor is approximately $72,300. This amount is calculated by dividing the total operating power reactor fee-relief adjustment ($7.5 million) by the number of operating power reactors (104). (3) The FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment allocated to the spent fuel storage/ reactor decommissioning class of licenses is $194,500. The FY 2010 spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning fee-relief adjustment to be assessed to each operating power reactor, each power reactor in decommissioning or possession-only status that has spent fuel onsite, and to each independent spent fuel storage 10 CFR part 72 licensee who does not hold a 10 CFR part 50 license, is approximately $1,581. This amount is calculated by dividing the total fee-relief adjustment costs allocated to this class by the total number of power reactor licenses, except those that permanently ceased operations and have no fuel onsite, and 10 CFR part 72 licensees who do not hold a 10 CFR part 50 license. (e) The FY 2010 annual fees for licensees authorized to operate a test and research (non-power) reactor licensed under part 50 of this chapter, unless the reactor is exempted from fees under § 171.11(a), are as follows: Research reactor .......................... Test reactor .................................. $81,800 $81,800 8. In § 171.16, the introductory text of paragraph (b), paragraphs (c) and (d), E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11396 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules and the introductory text of paragraph (e) are revised to read as follows: § 171.16 Annual fees: Materials licensees, holders of certificates of compliance, holders of sealed source and device registrations, holders of quality assurance program approvals, and government agencies licensed by the NRC. * * * * * (b) The annual fee is comprised of a base annual fee and an allocation for fee-relief adjustment. The activities comprising the fee-relief adjustment are shown in paragraph (e) of this section. The base annual fee is the sum of budgeted costs for the following activities: * * * * * (c) A licensee who is required to pay an annual fee under this section may qualify as a small entity. If a licensee qualifies as a small entity and provides the Commission with the proper certification along with its annual fee payment, the licensee may pay reduced annual fees as shown in the following table. Failure to file a small entity certification in a timely manner could result in the receipt of a delinquent invoice requesting the outstanding balance due and/or denial of any refund that might otherwise be due. The small entity fees are as follows: Maximum annual fee per licensed category Small Businesses Not Engaged in Manufacturing (Average gross receipts over last 3 completed fiscal years): $450,000 to $6.5 million ............................................................................................................................................................... Less than $450,000 ...................................................................................................................................................................... Small Not-For-Profit Organizations (Annual Gross Receipts): $450,000 to $6.5 million ............................................................................................................................................................... Less than $450,000 ...................................................................................................................................................................... Manufacturing entities that have an average of 500 employees or fewer: 35 to 500 employees .................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................ Small Governmental Jurisdictions (Including publicly supported educational institutions) (Population): 20,000 to 50,000 .......................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 20,000 ....................................................................................................................................................................... Educational Institutions that are not State or Publicly Supported, and have 500 Employees or Fewer: 35 to 500 employees .................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................ (d) The FY 2010 annual fees are comprised of a base annual fee and an allocation for fee-relief adjustment. The activities comprising the FY 2010 fee- relief adjustment are shown for convenience in paragraph (e) of this section. The FY 2010 annual fees for materials licensees and holders of $1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 certificates, registrations, or approvals subject to fees under this section are shown in the following table: SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY NRC [See footnotes at end of table] Annual fees 1 2 3 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses 1. Special nuclear material: A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of U–235 or plutonium for fuel fabrication activities: (a) Strategic Special Nuclear Material (High Enriched Uranium) [Program Code(s): 21130] .............................................. (b) Low Enriched Uranium in Dispersible Form sed for Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel [Program Code(s): 21210] ... (2) All other special nuclear materials licenses not included in Category 1.A.(1) which are licensed for fuel cycle activities: (a) Facilities with limited operations [Program Code(s): 21310, 21320] .............................................................................. (b) Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration facilities ........................................................................................................ (c) Others, including hot cell facilities ................................................................................................................................... B. Licenses for receipt and storage of spent fuel and reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) [Program Code(s): 23200] ............................................................................. C. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in devices used in industrial measuring systems, including x-ray fluorescence analyzers [Program Code(s): 22140] ........................................................ D. All other special nuclear material licenses, except licenses authorizing special nuclear material in unsealed form in combination that would constitute a critical quantity, as defined in § 150.11 of this chapter, for which the licensee shall pay the same fees as those for Category 1.A.(2) [Program Code(s): 22110, 22111, 22120, 22131, 22136, 22150, 22151, 22161, 22163, 22170, 23100, 23300, 23310] .......................................................................................................................... E. Licenses or certificates for the operation of a uranium enrichment facility [Program Code(s): 21200] ................................. 2. Source material: A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of source material for refining uranium mill concentrates to uranium hexafluoride [Program Code(s): 11400] ........................................................................................................................................................ (2) Licenses for possession and use of source material in recovery operations such as milling, in-situ recovery, heap-leaching, ore buying stations, ion-exchange facilities and in-processing of ores containing source material for extraction of metals other than uranium or thorium, including licenses authorizing the possession of byproduct waste material (tailings) from source material recovery operations, as well as licenses authorizing the possession and maintenance of a facility in a standby mode: (a) Conventional and Heap Leach facilities [Program Code(s): 11100] ............................................................................... (b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities [Program Code(s): 11500] ........................................................................................... (c) Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities [Program Code(s): 11510] .................................................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 $5,442,000 2,048,000 702,000 1,053,000 527,000 11 N/A 3,300 9,300 2,809,000 1,112,000 38,300 36,300 41,100 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 11397 SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY NRC—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Annual fees 1 2 3 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses (d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities [Program Code(s): 11550] ........................................................................................... (e) Resin Toll Milling facilities [Program Code(s): 11555] .................................................................................................... (f) Other facilities 4 [Program Code(s): 11700] ...................................................................................................................... (3) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for possession and disposal, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) or Category 2.A.(4) [Program Code(s): 11600, 12000] ................................................................................................................................ (4) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for possession and disposal incidental to the disposal of the uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee’s milling operations, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) [Program Code(s): 12010] ........ (5) Licenses that authorize the possession of source material related to removal of contaminants (source material) from drinking water [Program Code(s): 11820] ................................................................................................................................ B. Licenses that authorize only the possession, use, and/or installation of source material for shielding [Program Code(s): 11210] ....................................................................................................................................................................................... C. All other source material licenses [Program Code(s): 11200, 11220, 11221, 11230, 11300, 11800, 11810] ....................... 3. Byproduct material: A. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution [Program Code(s): 03211, 03212, 03213] ........................................................................................................................................................................... B. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution [Program Code(s): 03214, 03215, 22135, 22162] ....................................................................................................................................................................................... C. Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter authorizing the processing or manufacturing and distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct material. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized under part 40 of this chapter when included on the same license. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 171.11(a)(1). These licenses are covered by fee under Category 3.D. [Program Code(s): 02500, 02511, 02513] ........................................................................................................ D. Licenses and approvals issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter authorizing distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits and/or sources or devices not involving processing of byproduct material. This category includes licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and 32.74 of this chapter to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 171.11(a)(1). This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized under part 40 of this chapter when included on the same license [Program Code(s): 02512, 02514] ............................................................................................................................................................ E. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is not removed from its shield (self-shielded units) [Program Code(s): 03510, 03520] .......................................................... F. Licenses for possession and use of less than 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators for irradiation of materials in which the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes [Program Code(s): 03511] ......................... G. Licenses for possession and use of 10,000 curies or more of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators for irradiation of materials in which the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes [Program Code(s): 03521] ......................... H. Licenses issued under Subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require device review to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter, except specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03254, 03255] ........................................................................................ I. Licenses issued under Subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities of byproduct material that do not require device evaluation to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter, except for specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03250, 03251, 03252, 03253, 03256] ........................................................................................................................................................................... J. Licenses issued under Subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter, except specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03240, 03241, 03243] ........................................................................................................ K. Licenses issued under Subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities of byproduct material that do not require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter, except specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03242, 03244] ................................................. L. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution [Program Code(s): 01100, 01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612, 03613] ............................................................................................................................................................... M. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution [Program Code(s): 03620] .............................................................. N. Licenses that authorize services for other licensees, except: (1) Licenses that authorize only calibration and/or leak testing services are subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3.P.; and (2) Licenses that authorize waste disposal services are subject to the fees specified in fee categories 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C. [Program Code(s): 03219, 03225, 03226] ....... O. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized under part 40 of this chapter when authorized on the same license [Program Code(s): 03310, 03320] .......................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 34,400 5 N/A 5 N/A 5 N/A 12,400 8,600 1,600 21,100 49,200 12,700 16,700 10,600 8,200 15,500 76,900 9,900 18,100 4,200 3,000 24,300 9,100 13,800 28,200 11398 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY NRC—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Annual fees 1 2 3 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Category of materials licenses P. All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D. [Program Code(s): 02400, 02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123, 03124, 03220, 03221, 03222, 03800, 03810, 22130] ................................................. Q. Registration of devices generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter ............................................................................... R. Possession of items or products containing radium–226 identified in 10 CFR 31.12 which exceed the number of items or limits specified in that section:14 1. Possession of quantities exceeding the number of items or limits in 10 CFR 31.12(a)(4), or (5) but less than or equal to 10 times the number of items or limits specified [Program Code(s): 02700] ..................................................... 2. Possession of quantities exceeding 10 times the number of items or limits specified in 10 CFR 31.12(a)(4), or (5) [Program Code(s): 02710] ................................................................................................................................................. S. Licenses for production of accelerator-produced radionuclides [Program Code(s): 03210] ................................................... 4. Waste disposal and processing: A. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons for the purpose of contingency storage or commercial land disposal by the licensee; or licenses authorizing contingency storage of low-level radioactive waste at the site of nuclear power reactors; or licenses for receipt of waste from other persons for incineration or other treatment, packaging of resulting waste and residues, and transfer of packages to another person authorized to receive or dispose of waste material [Program Code(s): 03231, 03233, 03235, 03236, 06100, 06101] ................................................................................................................................................... B. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons for the purpose of packaging or repackaging the material. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material [Program Code(s): 03234] ................................ C. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of prepackaged waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material [Program Code(s): 03232] ................................................................................................. 5. Well logging: A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material for well logging, well surveys, and tracer studies other than field flooding tracer studies [Program Code(s): 03110, 03111, 03112] ............. B. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material for field flooding tracer studies [Program Code(s): 03113] ............ 6. Nuclear laundries: A. Licenses for commercial collection and laundry of items contaminated with byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material [Program Code(s): 03218] ....................................................................................................................... 7. Medical licenses: A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices, or similar beam therapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license [Program Code(s): 02300, 02310] ........................................................................................ B. Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 [Program Code(s): 02110] ........................................................................................................................................................ C. Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 [Program Code(s): 02120, 02121, 02200, 02201, 02210, 02220, 02230, 02231, 02240, 22160] ................................................................................................................................................... 8. Civil defense: A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material for civil defense activities [Program Code(s): 03710] ............................................................................................................................................. 9. Device, product, or sealed source safety evaluation: A. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except reactor fuel devices, for commercial distribution .................................................................. B. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel devices ....................................................................................................................................................... C. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except reactor fuel, for commercial distribution ..................................................................................... D. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel .................................................................................................................................................................... 10. Transportation of radioactive material: A. Certificates of Compliance or other package approvals issued for design of casks, packages, and shipping containers 1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and plutonium air packages ........................................................................................... 2. Other Casks ...................................................................................................................................................................... B. Quality assurance program approvals issued under part 71 of this chapter 1. Users and Fabricators ....................................................................................................................................................... 2. Users ................................................................................................................................................................................. C. Evaluation of security plans, route approvals, route surveys, and transportation security devices (including immobilization devices) ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 11. Standardized spent fuel facilities 12. Special Projects VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 4,500 13 N/A 4,100 4,500 15,000 5 N/A 23,100 14,600 12,000 5 N/A 42,900 21,300 45,100 7,600 4,100 12,600 12,600 8,800 1,500 6 N/A 6 N/A 6 N/A 6 N/A 6 N/A 6 N/A 6 N/A Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 11399 SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY NRC—Continued [See footnotes at end of table] Annual fees 1 2 3 Category of materials licenses 13. A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Compliance .................................................................................................................. B. General licenses for storage of spent fuel under 10 CFR 72.210 .......................................................................................... 14. Decommissioning/Reclamation: A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear material licenses and other approvals authorizing decommissioning, decontamination, reclamation, or site restoration activities under parts 30, 40, 70, 72, and 76 of this chapter ......................................... B. Site-specific decommissioning activities associated with unlicensed sites, whether or not the sites have been previously licensed ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 15. Import and Export licenses ............................................................................................................................................................ 16. Reciprocity ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 17. Master materials licenses of broad scope issued to Government agencies ................................................................................ 18. Department of Energy: A. Certificates of Compliance ....................................................................................................................................................... B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) activities .......................................................................................... 6 N/A 12 N/A 7 N/A 7 N/A 8 N/A 8 N/A 235,000 10 886,000 590,000 1 Annual erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 fees will be assessed based on whether a licensee held a valid license with the NRC authorizing possession and use of radioactive material during the current FY. The annual fee is waived for those materials licenses and holders of certificates, registrations, and approvals who either filed for termination of their licenses or approvals or filed for possession only/storage licenses before October 1, 2009, and permanently ceased licensed activities entirely before this date. Annual fees for licensees who filed for termination of a license, downgrade of a license, or for a possession-only license during the FY and for new licenses issued during the FY will be prorated in accordance with the provisions of § 171.17. If a person holds more than one license, certificate, registration, or approval, the annual fee(s) will be assessed for each license, certificate, registration, or approval held by that person. For licenses that authorize more than one activity on a single license (e.g., human use and irradiator activities), annual fees will be assessed for each category applicable to the license. Licensees paying annual fees under Category 1.A.(1) are not subject to the annual fees for Categories 1.C. and 1.D. for sealed sources authorized in the license. 2 Payment of the prescribed annual fee does not automatically renew the license, certificate, registration, or approval for which the fee is paid. Renewal applications must be filed in accordance with the requirements of parts 30, 40, 70, 71, 72, or 76 of this chapter. 3 Each FY, fees for these materials licenses will be calculated and assessed in accordance with § 171.13 and will be published in the Federal Register for notice and comment. 4 Other facilities include licenses for extraction of metals, heavy metals, and rare earths. 5 There are no existing NRC licenses in these fee categories. If NRC issues a license for these categories, the Commission will consider establishing an annual fee for this type of license. 6 Standardized spent fuel facilities, 10 CFR parts 71 and 72 Certificates of Compliance and related Quality Assurance program approvals, and special reviews, such as topical reports, are not assessed an annual fee because the generic costs of regulating these activities are primarily attributable to users of the designs, certificates, and topical reports. 7 Licensees in this category are not assessed an annual fee because they are charged an annual fee in other categories while they are licensed to operate. 8 No annual fee is charged because it is not practical to administer due to the relatively short life or temporary nature of the license. 9 Separate annual fees will not be assessed for pacemaker licenses issued to medical institutions that also hold nuclear medicine licenses under Categories 7.B. or 7.C. 10 This includes Certificates of Compliance issued to the Department of Energy that are not funded from the Nuclear Waste Fund. 11 See § 171.15(c). 12 See § 171.15(c). 13 No annual fee is charged for this category because the cost of the general license registration program applicable to licenses in this category will be recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees. 14 Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in this category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources are possessed for storage only.) (e) The fee-relief adjustment allocated to annual fees includes the budgeted resources for the activities listed in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, plus the total budgeted resources for the activities included in paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(3) of this section, as reduced by the appropriations NRC receives for these types of activities. If the NRC’s appropriations for these types of activities are greater than the budgeted resources for the activities included in paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(3) of this section for a given FY, a negative feerelief adjustment (or annual fee reduction) will be allocated to annual fees. The activities comprising the FY 2010 fee-relief adjustment are as follows: * * * * * Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of February 2010. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. J.E. Dyer, Chief Financial Officer. Note: This Appendix will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. Appendix A to This Proposed Rule— Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Final Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170 (License Fees) and 10 CFR Part 171 (Annual Fees) I. Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that agencies consider the impact of their rulemakings on small entities and, consistent with applicable statutes, consider alternatives to minimize these impacts on the businesses, organizations, and government jurisdictions to which they apply. The NRC has established standards for determining which NRC licensees qualify as small entities (10 CFR 2.810). These PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 standards were based on the Small Business Administration’s most common receiptsbased size standards and provides for business concerns that are manufacturing entities. The NRC uses the size standards to reduce the impact of annual fees on small entities by establishing a licensee’s eligibility to qualify for a maximum small entity fee. The small entity fee categories in § 171.16(c) of this proposed rule are based on the NRC’s size standards. The NRC is required each year, under OBRA–90, as amended, to recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority (less amounts appropriated from the NWF and for other activities specifically removed from the fee base), through fees to NRC licensees and applicants. In total, the NRC is required to bill approximately $911.1 million in fees for FY 2010. OBRA–90 requires that the schedule of charges established by rulemaking should fairly and equitably allocate the total amount to be recovered from the NRC’s licensees and be assessed under the principle that licensees who require the greatest expenditure of E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11400 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 agency resources pay the greatest annual charges. Since FY 1991, the NRC has complied with OBRA–90 by issuing a final rule that amends its fee regulations. These final rules have established the methodology used by the NRC in identifying and determining the fees to be assessed and collected in any given FY. The Commission is proposing to rebaseline its 10 CFR part 171 annual fees in FY 2010. Rebaselining fees results in higher annual fees for five classes of licensees (power reactors, spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning, transportation, uranium recovery and materials users), and lower for one class of licensees (non-power reactors). Within the fuel facilities fee class, annual fees for most licensees increase, while the annual fee for one fee category decreases. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) provides Congress with the opportunity to review agency rules before they go into effect. Under this legislation, the NRC annual fee rule is considered a ‘‘major’’ rule and must be reviewed by Congress and the Comptroller General before the rule becomes effective. The SBREFA also requires that an agency prepare a guide to assist small entities in complying with each rule for which a final RFA is prepared. As required by law, this analysis and the small entity compliance guide (Attachment 1) have been prepared for the FY 2010 fee rule, as required by law. II. Impact on Small Entities The fee rule results in substantial fees charged to those individuals, organizations, and companies licensed by the NRC, including those licensed under the NRC materials program. Comments received on previous proposed fee rules and the small entity certifications in response to previous final fee rules indicate that licensees qualifying as small entities under the NRC’s size standards are primarily materials licensees. Therefore, this analysis will focus on the economic impact of fees on materials licensees. In FY 2009, about 26 percent of these licensees (approximately 1,000 licensees) qualified as small entities. Commenters on previous fee rulemakings consistently indicated that the following would occur if the proposed annual fees were not modified: 1. Large firms would gain an unfair competitive advantage over small entities. Commenters noted that small and very small companies (‘‘Mom and Pop’’ operations) would find it more difficult to absorb the annual fee than a large corporation or a highvolume type of operation. In competitive markets, such as soil testing, annual fees would put small licensees at an extreme competitive disadvantage with their much larger competitors because the proposed fees would be identical for both small and large firms. 2. Some firms would be forced to cancel their licenses. A licensee with receipts of less than $500,000 per year stated that the proposed rule would, in effect, force it to relinquish its soil density gauge and license, thereby reducing its ability to do its work effectively. Other licensees, especially wellloggers, noted that the increased fees would VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 force small businesses to abandon the materials license altogether. Commenters estimated that the proposed rule would cause roughly 10 percent of the well-logging licensees to terminate their licenses immediately and approximately 25 percent to terminate before the next annual assessment. 3. Some companies would go out of business. 4. Some companies would have budget problems. Many medical licensees noted that, along with reduced reimbursements, the proposed increase of the existing fees and the introduction of additional fees would significantly affect their budgets. Others noted that, in view of the cuts by Medicare and other third party carriers, the fees would produce a hardship difficult for some facilities to meet. Over 3,000 licenses, approvals, and registration terminations have been requested since the NRC first established annual fees for materials licenses. Although some terminations were requested because the license was no longer needed or could be combined with registrations, indications are that the economic impact of the fees caused other terminations. To alleviate the significant impact of the annual fees on a substantial number of small entities, the NRC considered the following alternatives in accordance with the RFA in developing each of its fee rules since FY 1991. 1. Base fees on some measure of the amount of radioactivity possessed by the licensee (e.g., number of sources). 2. Base fees on frequency of use of licensed radioactive material (e.g., volume of patients). 3. Base fees on the NRC size standards for small entities. The NRC has reexamined its previous evaluations of these alternatives and continues to believe that a maximum fee for small entities is the most appropriate and effective option for reducing the impact of fees on small entities. III. Maximum Fee The SBREFA and its implementing guidance do not provide specific guidelines on what constitutes a significant economic impact on a small entity; therefore, the NRC has no benchmark to assist it in determining the amount or percent of gross receipts that should be charged to a small entity. In developing the maximum small entity annual fee in FY 1991, the NRC examined 10 CFR part 170 licensing and inspection fees and Agreement State fees for fee categories which were expected to have a substantial number of small entities. Six Agreement States (Washington, Texas, Illinois, Nebraska, New York, and Utah), were used as benchmarks in the establishment of the maximum small entity annual fee in FY 1991. The NRC maximum small entity fee was established as an annual fee only. In addition to the annual fee, NRC small entity licensees were required to pay amendment, renewal and inspection fees. In setting the small entity annual fee, NRC ensured that the total amount small entities paid would not exceed the maximum paid in the six benchmark Agreement States. PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Of the six benchmark states, the NRC used Washington’s maximum Agreement State fee of $3,800 as the ceiling for total fees. Thus NRC’s small entity fee was developed to ensure that the total fees paid by NRC small entities would not exceed $3,800. Given the NRC’s FY 1991 fee structure for inspections, amendments, and renewals, a small entity annual fee established at $1,800 allowed the total fee (small entity annual fee plus yearly average for inspections, amendments, and renewal fees) for all categories to fall under the $3,800 ceiling. In FY 1992, the NRC introduced a second, lower tier to the small entity fee in response to concerns that the $1,800 fee, when added to the license and inspection fees, still imposed a significant impact on small entities with relatively low gross annual receipts. For purposes of the annual fee, each small entity size standard was divided into an upper and lower tier. Small entity licensees in the upper tier continued to pay an annual fee of $1,800, while those in the lower tier paid an annual fee of $400. Based on the changes that had occurred since FY 1991, the NRC re-analyzed its maximum small entity annual fees in FY 2000 and determined that the small entity fees should be increased by 25 percent to reflect the increase in the average fees paid by other materials licensees since FY 1991, as well as changes in the fee structure for materials licensees. The structure of fees NRC charged its materials licensees changed during the period between 1991 and 1999. Costs for materials license inspections, renewals, and amendments, which were previously recovered through part 170 fees for services, are now included in the part 171 annual fees assessed to materials licensees. Because of the 25 percent increase, in FY 2000 the maximum small entity annual fee increased from $1,800 to $2,300. However, despite the increase, total fees for many small entities were reduced because they no longer paid part 170 fees. Costs not recovered from small entities were allocated to other materials licensees and to power reactors. While reducing the impact on many small entities, the NRC determined that the maximum annual fee of $2,300 for small entities could continue to have a significant impact on materials licensees with relatively low annual gross receipts. Therefore, the NRC continued to provide the lower-tier small entity annual fee for small entities with relatively low gross annual receipts, manufacturing concerns, and for educational institutions not State or publicly supported with fewer than 35 employees. The NRC also increased the lower tier small entity fee by 25 percent, the same percentage increase to the maximum small entity annual fee, resulting in the lower tier small entity fee increasing from $400 to $500 in FY 2000. The NRC stated in the RFA for the FY 2001 final fee rule that it would re-examine the small entity fees every two years, in the same years in which it conducts the biennial review of fees as required by the Chief Financial Officers Act. Accordingly, the NRC examined the small entity fees again in FY 2003 and FY 2005, determining that a change was not warranted to those fees established in FY 2001. E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules As part of the small entity review in FY 2007, the NRC also considered whether it should establish reduced fees for small entities under part 170. The NRC received one comment requesting that small entity fees be considered for certain export licenses, particularly in light of the recent increases to part 170 fees for these licenses. Because the NRC’s part 170 fees are not assessed to a licensee or applicant on a regular basis (i.e., they are only assessed when a licensee or applicant requests a specific service from the NRC), the NRC does not believe that the impact of its part 170 fees warrants a fee reduction for small entities, in addition to the part 171 small entity fee reduction. Regarding export licenses, the NRC notes that interested parties can submit a single application for a broad scope, multi-year license that permits exports to multiple countries. Because the NRC charges fees per application, this process minimizes the fees for export applicants. Because a single NRC fee can cover numerous exports, and because there are a limited number of entities who apply for these licenses, the NRC does not anticipate that the part 170 export fees will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the NRC retained the $2,300 small entity annual fee and the $500 lower tier small entity annual fee for FY 2007 and FY 2008. The NRC conducted an in-depth biennial review of the FY 2009 small entity fees. The review noted significant changes between FY 2000 and FY 2008 in both the external and internal environment which impacted fees for NRC’s small materials users licensees. Since FY 2000, small entity licensees in the upper tier had increased approximately 53 percent. In addition, due to changes in the law, NRC is now only required to recover 90 percent of its budget authority compared to 100 percent recovery required in FY 2000. This ten percent fee relief has influenced the small materials users’ annual fees. A decrease in the NRC’s budget allocation to the small materials users also influenced annual fees in FY 2007 and FY 2008. Based on the review, the NRC changed the methodology for reviewing small entity fees. The NRC determined the maximum small entity fee should be adjusted each biennial year using a fixed percentage of 39 percent applied to the prior two-year weighted average of small materials users fees for all fee categories which have small entity licensees. The 39 percent was based on the small entity annual fee for FY 2005, which was first year the NRC was required to recover only 90 percent of its budget authority. The FY 2005 small entity annual fee of $2,300 was 39 percent of the two-year weighted average for all fee categories in FY 2005 and FY 2006 that had an upper tier small entity licensee. The new methodology allows small entity licensees to be able to predict changes in their fee in the biennial year based on the small materials fees for the previous two years. Using a two-year weighted average smoothes the fluctuations caused by programmatic and budget variables and reflects the importance of the fee categories with the majority of small entities. The agency also determined the lower tier annual fee should remain at 22 percent of the maximum small entity annual fee. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 Therefore, for FY 2009 the NRC decreased the maximum small entity fee from $2,300 to $1,900 and decreased the lower tier annual fee from $500 to $400. The NRC is not proposing changes to these fees in FY 2010 and plans to re-examine the small entity fees again in FY 2011. IV. Summary The NRC has determined that the 10 CFR part 171 annual fees significantly impact a substantial number of small entities. A maximum fee for small entities strikes a balance between the requirement to recover 90 percent of the NRC budget and the requirement to consider means of reducing the impact of the fee on small entities. Based on its regulatory flexibility analysis, the NRC concludes that a maximum annual fee of $1,900 for small entities and a lower-tier small entity annual fee of $400 for small businesses and not-for-profit organizations with gross annual receipts of less than $450,000, small governmental jurisdictions with a population of fewer than 20,000, small manufacturing entities that have fewer than 35 employees, and educational institutions that are not State or publicly supported and have fewer than 35 employees, reduces the impact on small entities. At the same time, these reduced annual fees are consistent with the objectives of OBRA–90. Thus, the fees for small entities maintain a balance between the objectives of OBRA–90 and the RFA. Therefore, the analysis and conclusions previously established remain valid for FY 2010. Attachment 1 to Appendix A—U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Small Entity Compliance Guide; Fiscal Year 2010 Contents Introduction NRC Definition of Small Entity NRC Small Entity Fees Instructions for Completing NRC Form 526 Introduction The Congressional Review Act requires all Federal agencies to prepare a written guide for each ‘‘major’’ final rule, as defined by the Act. The NRC’s fee rule, published annually to comply with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA–90), as amended, is considered a ‘‘major’’ rule under the Congressional Review Act. Therefore, in compliance with the law, this guide has been prepared to assist NRC materials licensees in complying with the FY 2010 fee rule. Licensees may use this guide to determine whether they qualify as a small entity under NRC regulations and are eligible to pay reduced FY 2010 annual fees assessed under 10 CFR part 171. The NRC has established two tiers of annual fees for those materials licensees who qualify as small entities under the NRC’s size standards. Licensees who meet the NRC’s size standards for a small entity (listed in 10 CFR 2.810) must submit a completed NRC Form 526 ‘‘Certification of Small Entity Status for the Purposes of Annual Fees Imposed under 10 CFR Part 171’’ to qualify for the reduced annual fee. This form can be accessed on the NRC’s Web site at https://www.nrc.gov. The form can then be accessed by selecting PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 11401 ‘‘Business with NRC,’’ then ‘‘NRC Forms,’’ selecting NRC Form 526. For licensees who cannot access the NRC’s Web site, NRC Form 526 may be obtained through the local point of contact listed in the NRC’s ‘‘Materials Annual Fee Billing Handbook,’’ NUREG/BR– 0238, which is enclosed with each annual fee billing. Alternatively, the form may be obtained by calling the fee staff at 301–415– 7554, or by e-mailing the fee staff at fees.resource@nrc.gov. The completed form, the appropriate small entity fee, and the payment copy of the invoice should be mailed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Accounts Receivable/Payable Branch, at the address indicated on the invoice. Failure to file the NRC small entity certification Form 526 in a timely manner may result in the denial of any refund that might otherwise be due. NRC Definition of Small Entity For purposes of compliance with its regulations (10 CFR 2.810), the NRC has defined a small entity as follows: (1) Small business—a for-profit concern that provides a service, or a concern that is not engaged in manufacturing, with average gross receipts of $6.5 million or less over its last 3 completed fiscal years; (2) Manufacturing industry—a manufacturing concern with an average of 500 or fewer employees based on employment during each pay period for the preceding 12 calendar months; (3) Small organizations—a not-for-profit organization that is independently owned and operated and has annual gross receipts of $6.5 million or less; (4) Small governmental jurisdiction—a government of a city, county, town, township, village, school district, or special district, with a population of fewer than 50,000; (5) Small educational institution—an educational institution supported by a qualifying small governmental jurisdiction, or one that is not State or publicly supported and has 500 or fewer employees.1 To further assist licensees in determining if they qualify as a small entity, the following guidelines are provided, which are based on the Small Business Administration’s regulations (13 CFR part 121). (1) A small business concern is an independently owned and operated entity which is not considered dominant in its field of operations. (2) The number of employees means the total number of employees in the parent company, any subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including both foreign and domestic locations (i.e., not solely the number of employees working for the licensee or conducting NRC-licensed activities for the company). (3) Gross annual receipts include all revenue received or accrued from any source, 1An educational institution referred to in the size standards is an entity whose primary function is education, whose programs are accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association, who is legally authorized to provide a program of organized instruction or study, who provides an educational program for which it awards academic degrees, and whose educational programs are available to the public. E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3 11402 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules including receipts of the parent company, any subsidiaries and/or affiliates, and account for both foreign and domestic locations. Receipts include all revenues from sales of products and services, interest, rent, fees, and commissions from whatever sources derived (i.e., not solely receipts from NRClicensed activities). (4) A licensee who is a subsidiary of a large entity, including a foreign entity, does not qualify as a small entity. NRC Small Entity Fees In 10 CFR 171.16(c), the NRC has established two tiers of fees for licensees that qualify as a small entity under the NRC’s size standards. The fees are as follows: Maximum annual fee per licensed category erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Small Businesses Not Engaged in Manufacturing (Average gross receipts over last 3 completed fiscal years): $450,000 to $6.5 million ............................................................................................................................................................... Less than $450,000 ...................................................................................................................................................................... Small Not-For-Profit Organizations (Annual Gross Receipts): $450,000 to $6.5 million ............................................................................................................................................................... Less than $450,000 ...................................................................................................................................................................... Manufacturing entities that have an average of 500 employees or fewer: 35 to 500 employees .................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................ Small Governmental Jurisdictions (Including publicly supported educational institutions) (Population): 20,000 to 50,000 .......................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 20,000 ....................................................................................................................................................................... Educational Institutions that are not State or Publicly Supported, and have 500 Employees or Fewer: 35 to 500 employees .................................................................................................................................................................... Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................ Instructions for Completing NRC Small Entity Form 526 1. Complete all items on NRC Form 526 as follows: (Note: Incomplete or improperly completed forms will be returned as unacceptable.) (a) Enter the license number and invoice number exactly as they appear on the annual fee invoice. (b) Enter the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). (c) Enter the licensee’s name and address exactly as they appear on the invoice. Annotate name and/or address changes for billing purposes on the payment copy of the invoice—include contact’s name, telephone number, e-mail address, and company Web site address. Correcting the name and/or address on NRC Form 526 or on the invoice does not constitute a request to amend the license. (d) Check the appropriate size standard under which the licensee qualifies as a small entity. Check one box only. Note the following: (i) A licensee who is a subsidiary of a large entity, including foreign entities, does not qualify as a small entity. The calculation of a firm’s size includes the employees or receipts of all affiliates. Affiliation with another concern is based on the power to control, whether exercised or not. Such factors as common ownership, common management, and identity of interest (often found in members of the same family), among others, are indications of affiliation. The affiliated business concerns need not be in the same line of business. (ii) Gross annual receipts, as used in the size standards, include all revenue received or accrued by your company from all sources, regardless of the form of the revenue and not solely receipts from licensed activities. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:12 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 220001 (iii) NRC’s size standards on a small entity are based on the Small Business Administration’s regulations (13 CFR part 121). (iv) The size standards apply to the licensee, not to the individual authorized users who may be listed in the license. 2. If the invoice states the ‘‘Amount Billed Represents 50% Proration,’’ the amount due is not the prorated amount shown on the invoice but rather one-half of the maximum small entity annual fee shown on NRC Form 526 for the size standard under which the licensee qualifies (either $950 or $200) for each category billed. 3. If the invoice amount is less than the reduced small entity annual fee shown on this form, pay the amount on the invoice; there is no further reduction. In this case, do not file NRC Form 526. However, if the invoice amount is greater than the reduced small entity annual fee, file NRC Form 526 and pay the amount applicable to the size standard you checked on the form. 4. The completed NRC Form 526 must be submitted with the required annual fee payment and the ‘‘Payment Copy’’ of the invoice to the address shown on the invoice. 5. 10 CFR 171.16(c)(3) states licensees shall submit a new certification with its annual fee payment each year. Failure to submit NRC Form 526 at the time the annual fee is paid will require the licensee to pay the full amount of the invoice. The NRC sends invoices to its licensees for the full annual fee, even though some licensees qualify for reduced fees as small entities. Licensees who qualify as small entities and file NRC Form 526, which certifies eligibility for small entity fees, may pay the reduced fee, which is either $1,900 or $400 for a full year, depending on the size of the entity, for each fee category shown on PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 $1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 1,900 400 the invoice. Licensees granted a license during the first 6 months of the fiscal year, and licensees who file for termination or for a ‘‘possession-only’’ license and permanently cease licensed activities during the first 6 months of the fiscal year, pay only 50 percent of the annual fee for that year. Such invoices state that the ‘‘amount billed represents 50% proration.’’ Licensees must file a new small entity form (NRC Form 526) with the NRC each fiscal year to qualify for reduced fees in that year. Because a licensee’s ‘‘size,’’ or the size standards, may change from year to year, the invoice reflects the full fee, and licensees must complete and return NRC Form 526 for the fee to be reduced to the small entity fee amount. Licensees will not receive a new invoice for the reduced amount. The completed NRC Form 526, the payment of the appropriate small entity fee, and the ‘‘Payment Copy’’ of the invoice should be mailed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Accounts Receivable/Payable Branch, at the address indicated on the invoice. If you have questions regarding the NRC’s annual fees, please contact the license fee staff at 301–415–7554, e-mail the fee staff at fees.resource@nrc.gov, or write to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: Office of the Chief Financial Officer. False certification of small entity status could result in civil sanctions being imposed by the NRC under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq. NRC’s implementing regulations are found at 10 CFR part 13. [FR Doc. 2010–4528 Filed 3–9–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P E:\FR\FM\10MRP3.SGM 10MRP3

Agencies

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11376-11402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4528]

[[Page 11375]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

10 CFR Parts 170 and 171

Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2010; Proposed Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 46 / Wednesday, March 10, 2010 /
Proposed Rules

[[Page 11376]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Parts 170 and 171

[NRC-2009-0333]
RIN 3150-AI70

Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2010

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend
the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its applicants
and licensees. The proposed amendments are necessary to implement the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA-90), as amended, which
requires the NRC to recover through fees approximately 90 percent of
its budget authority in fiscal year (FY) 2010, not including amounts
appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund (NWF), amounts appropriated
for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR), and amounts appropriated
for generic homeland security activities. Based on the Energy and Water
Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2010, signed by the
President on October 28, 2009, the NRC's required fee recovery amount
for the FY 2010 budget is approximately $912.2 million. After
accounting for billing adjustments, the total amount to be billed as
fees is approximately $911.1 million.

DATES: The comment period expires April 9, 2010. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
NRC is able to ensure only that comments received on or before this
date will be considered. Because OBRA-90 requires that the NRC collect
the FY 2010 fees by September 30, 2010, requests for extensions of the
comment period will not be granted.

ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC-2009-0333 in the subject line
of your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form
will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web
site Regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be edited to
remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you
against including any information in your submission that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any
identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not
include any information in their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed.
You may submit comments by any one of the following methods.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-2009-0333. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher 301-492-3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do not
receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your comments,
contact us directly at 301-415-1677.
Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. (Telephone
301-415-1677.)
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at
301-415-1101.
You can access publicly available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1
F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC's public
documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR
reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Public comments and supporting
materials related to this proposed rule can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: NRC-2009-0333.
To obtain additional information on the NRC's FY 2010 budget
request, commenters and others may review NUREG-1100, Volume 25,
``Performance Budget: Fiscal Year 2010'' (May 2009), which describes
the NRC's budget for FY 2010, including the activities to be performed
in each program. This document is available on the NRC's public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1100/. Note, however, that NUREG-1100, Volume 25, is based on the
NRC's FY 2010 budget request to Congress, and that the fees in this
rulemaking are based on the Energy and Water Development and Related
Agencies Appropriation Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-85). The NRC's total
appropriation of $1,066.9 million is approximately $4.2 million less
than the agency's FY 2010 budget request to Congress. However,
adjustments to NRC's budget request resulted in an approximately $25
million increase to NRC's total fee recovery amount from the FY 2010
budget request. The allocation of the Public Law 111-85 budget to
planned activities within each program, and to each fee class and fee-
relief category, is included in the publicly available work papers
supporting this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca I. Erickson, Office of the
Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone 301-415-7126, e-mail
Rebecca.Erickson@NRC.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background
II. Proposed Action
A. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170: Fees for Facilities,
Materials, Import and Export Licenses, and Other Regulatory Services
Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended
B. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 171: Annual Fees for Reactor
Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses, Including
Holders of Certificates of Compliance, Registrations, and Quality
Assurance Program Approvals and Government Agencies Licensed by the
NRC
III. Plain Language
IV. Voluntary Consensus Standards
V. Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
VII. Regulatory Analysis
VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
IX. Backfit Analysis

I. Background

The NRC is required each year, under OBRA-90 (42 U.S.C. 2214), as
amended, to recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority,
not including amounts appropriated from the NWF, amounts appropriated
for WIR, and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security
activities (non-fee items), through fees to NRC licensees and
applicants. The NRC receives 10 percent of its budget authority (not

[[Page 11377]]

including non-fee items) from the general fund each year to pay for the
cost of agency activities that do not provide a direct benefit to NRC
licensees, such as international assistance and Agreement State
activities (as defined under section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended).
The NRC assesses two types of fees to meet the requirements of
OBRA-90. First, user fees, presented in 10 CFR part 170 under the
authority of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA)
(31 U.S.C. 9701), recover the NRC's cost of providing special benefits
to identifiable applicants and licensees. For example, the NRC assesses
these fees to cover the cost of inspections, applications for new
licenses and license renewals, and requests for license amendments.
Second, annual fees, presented in 10 CFR part 171 under the authority
of OBRA-90, recover generic regulatory costs not otherwise recovered
through 10 CFR part 170 fees.
Based on Public Law 111-85, the NRC's required fee recovery amount
for the FY 2010 budget is approximately $912.2 million, which is
reduced by approximately $1.1 million to account for billing
adjustments (i.e., expected unpaid invoices, payments for prior year
invoices), resulting in a total of approximately $911.1 million to be
billed as fees in FY 2010.
In accordance with OBRA-90, $22.2 million of the agency's budgeted
resources for generic homeland security activities are excluded from
the NRC's fee base in FY 2010. These funds cover generic activities
such as rulemakings and the development of guidance documents that
support entire license fee classes or classes of licensees. Under its
IOAA authority, the NRC will continue to charge part 170 fees for all
licensee-specific homeland security-related services provided,
including security inspections and security plan reviews.
The amount of the NRC's required fee collections is set by law, and
is, therefore, outside the scope of this rulemaking. In FY 2010, the
NRC's total fee recovery amount has increased by $41.5 million from FY
2009, mostly in response to increased activities for reactor oversight,
new reactor programs, information technology support, homeland security
issues, and licensing reviews for fuel facilities, non-power reactors
and spent fuel storage. The FY 2010 budget was allocated to the fee
classes that the budgeted activities support. As such, the annual fees
for power reactor, most fuel facility, uranium recovery, and small
materials licensees have increased. Another factor affecting the amount
of annual fees for each fee class is the estimated collection under
part 170, discussed in Section II, ``Proposed Action'', of this
document.

II. Proposed Action

The NRC is proposing to amend its licensing, inspection, and annual
fees to recover approximately 90 percent of its FY 2010 budget
authority less the appropriations for non-fee items. The NRC's total
budget authority for FY 2010 is $1,066.9 million. The non-fee items
include $29.0 million appropriated from the NWF, $2.1 million for WIR
activities, and $22.2 million for generic homeland security activities.
Based on the 90 percent fee-recovery requirement, the NRC will have to
recover approximately $912.2 million in FY 2010 through part 170
licensing and inspection fees and part 171 annual fees. The amount
required by law to be recovered through fees for FY 2010 would be $41.5
million more than the amount estimated for recovery in FY 2009, an
increase of approximately 5 percent.
The FY 2010 fee recovery amount is reduced by $1.1 million to
account for billing adjustments (i.e., for FY 2010 invoices that the
NRC estimates will not be paid during the fiscal year, less payments
received in FY 2010 for prior year invoices). This leaves approximately
$911.1 million to be billed as fees in FY 2010 through part 170
licensing and inspection fees and part 171 annual fees.
Table I summarizes the budget and fee recovery amounts for FY 2010.
(Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.)

Table I--Budget and Fee Recovery Amounts for FY 2010
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Budget Authority.................................. $1,066.9
Less Non-Fee Items...................................... -53.3
---------------
Balance............................................. $1,013.6
Fee Recovery Rate for FY 2010........................... x 90.0%
---------------
Total Amount to be Recovered for FY 2010................ $912.2
Less Part 171 Billing Adjustments:
Unpaid FY 2010 Invoices (estimated)................. 2.1
Less Payments Received in FY 2010 for Prior Year -3.2
Invoices (estimated)...............................
---------------
Subtotal........................................ -1.1
Amount to be Recovered Through Parts 170 and 171 Fees... $911.1
Less Estimated Part 170 Fees............................ -364.0
---------------
Part 171 Fee Collections Required....................... $547.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NRC estimates that $364 million would be recovered from part
170 fees in FY 2010. This represents an increase of approximately 9
percent as compared to the actual part 170 collections of $332.6
million for FY 2009. The NRC derived the FY 2010 estimate of part 170
fee collections based on the previous four quarters of billing data for
each license fee class, with adjustments to account for changes in the
NRC's FY 2010 budget, as appropriate. The remaining $547.1 million
would be recovered through the part 171 annual fees in FY 2010, which
is an increase of approximately 4 percent compared to actual part 171
collections of $525.3 million for FY 2009.
The NRC plans to publish the final fee rule no later than June
2010. The FY 2010 final fee rule will be a ``major rule'' as defined by
the Congressional Review Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801-808). Therefore, the
NRC's fee schedules for FY 2010 will become effective 60 days after
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. The NRC will
send an

[[Page 11378]]

invoice for the amount of the annual fee to reactor licensees, 10 CFR
part 72 licensees, major fuel cycle facilities, and other licensees
with annual fees of $100,000 or more, upon publication of the FY 2010
final rule. For these licensees, payment is due on the effective date
of the FY 2010 final rule. Because these licensees are billed
quarterly, the payment due is the amount of the total FY 2010 annual
fee, less payments made in the first three quarters of the fiscal year.
Materials licensees with annual fees of less than $100,000 are
billed annually. Those materials licensees whose license anniversary
date during FY 2010 falls before the effective date of the FY 2010
final rule will be billed for the annual fee during the anniversary
month of the license at the FY 2009 annual fee rate. Those materials
licensees whose license anniversary date falls on or after the
effective date of the FY 2010 final rule will be billed for the annual
fee at the FY 2010 annual fee rate during the anniversary month of the
license, and payment will be due on the date of the invoice.
As a cost saving measure, the NRC will discontinue mailing the
proposed fee rule to all licensees. Instead, the NRC will send
licensees a short summary of the proposed rule and information on how
to access the complete proposed rule on the Internet. The NRC currently
does not mail the final fee rule to all licensees, but will send the
final rule or the proposed rule to any licensee or other person upon
specific request. To request a copy, contact the Accounts Receivable/
Payable Branch, Division of the Controller, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, at 301-415-7554, or e-mail fees.resource@nrc.gov. In
addition to publication in the Federal Register, both the proposed and
final rules will be available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
The NRC plans to review its fee policies for power reactors. The
NRC anticipates that it will receive applications to license small and
medium sized commercial nuclear reactors. The NRC published an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12735) to
receive early input from the public on issues relevant to the
establishment of an annual fee structure based on the size of the
reactor. The NRC received sixteen comments in response to the ANPR. The
general consensus from the commenters is that an adjustment to the
current power reactor annual fee methodology is needed to account for
small and medium sized power reactors. The NRC plans to analyze
suggested methodologies for a variable annual fee structure for power
reactors and present its findings in a future proposed rule.
The NRC also plans to change its current policy with regard to
billing inspection costs. Currently, inspection costs are billed only
after the inspection is completed (i.e., approximately 30 days after
the inspection report is issued). As a result, in some cases inspection
costs accumulate over several billing cycles, and the licensee receives
one invoice for these accumulated costs rather than being billed as the
costs are incurred. Therefore, the NRC plans to bill for accumulated
inspection costs before issuance of the inspection report. Billing for
incurred inspection costs will begin when the NRC's new accounting
system is implemented, scheduled for early FY 2011. This policy change
does not require a revision to part 170.
The NRC is proposing to amend 10 CFR parts 170 and 171, as
discussed in Sections II.A and II.B of this document.

A. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170: Fees for Facilities, Materials,
Import and Export Licenses, and Other Regulatory Services Under the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended

In FY 2010, the NRC is proposing to increase the hourly rate to
recover the full cost of activities under part 170 and is using this
rate to calculate ``flat'' application fees.
The NRC is proposing the following changes:
1. Hourly Rate
The NRC's hourly rate is used in assessing full cost fees for
specific services provided, as well as flat fees for certain
application reviews. The NRC is proposing to change the FY 2010 hourly
rate to $259. This rate would be applicable to all activities for which
fees are assessed under Sec. Sec. 170.21 and 170.31. The FY 2010
proposed hourly rate is higher than the hourly rate of $257 in the FY
2009 final fee rule. The increase is primarily due to the higher FY
2010 budget supporting increased infrastructure and support costs for
the new reactors program, fuel facility reviews, reactor licensing
renewal, international activities, and spent fuel storage and
transportation activities. The hourly rate calculation is described in
further detail in the following paragraphs.
The NRC's hourly rate is derived by dividing the sum of recoverable
budgeted resources for (1) Mission direct program salaries and
benefits; (2) mission indirect salaries and benefits and contract
activity; and (3) agency management and support and the Inspector
General (IG), by mission direct full-time equivalent (FTE) hours. The
mission direct FTE hours are the product of the mission direct FTE
times the hours per direct FTE. The only budgeted resources excluded
from the hourly rate are those for mission direct contract activities.
In FY 2010, the NRC is proposing to use 1,371 hours per direct FTE,
the same amount as FY 2009, to calculate the hourly fees. The NRC has
reviewed data from its time and labor system to determine if the annual
direct hours worked per direct FTE estimate requires updating for the
FY 2010 fee rule. Based on this review of the most recent data
available, the NRC determined that 1,371 hours is the best estimate of
direct hours worked annually per direct FTE. This estimate excludes all
indirect activities such as training, general administration, and
leave.
Table II shows the results of the hourly rate calculation
methodology. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.)

Table II--FY 2010 Hourly Rate Calculation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mission Direct Program Salaries & Benefits.............. $343.8M
Mission Indirect Salaries & Benefits, and Contract 135.6M
Activity...............................................
Agency Management and Support, and the IG............... 330.4M
---------------
Subtotal............................................ $809.8M
Less Offsetting Receipts................................ -0.0M
---------------
Total Budget Included in Hourly Rate................ $809.8M
---------------
Mission Direct FTEs..................................... 2,276

[[Page 11379]]

Professional Hourly Rate (Total Budget Included in $259
Hourly Rate divided by Mission Direct FTE Hours).......
------------------------------------------------------------------------

As shown in Table II, dividing the $809.8 million budgeted amount
(rounded) included in the hourly rate by total mission direct FTE hours
(2,276 FTE times 1,371 hours) results in an hourly rate of $259. The
hourly rate is rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
2. ``Flat'' Application Fee Changes
The NRC is proposing to adjust the current flat application fees in
Sec. Sec. 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect the revised hourly rate of
$259. These flat fees are calculated by multiplying the average
professional staff hours needed to process the licensing actions by the
proposed professional hourly rate for FY 2010. The agency estimates the
average professional staff hours needed to process licensing actions
every other year as part of its biennial review of fees performed in
compliance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990. This review
was last performed as part of the FY 2009 fee rulemaking. The higher
hourly rate of $259 is the main reason for the increase in application
fees.
The amounts of the materials licensing flat fees are rounded so
that the fees would be convenient to the user and the effects of
rounding would be minimal. Fees under $1,000 are rounded to the nearest
$10, fees that are greater than $1,000 but less than $100,000 are
rounded to the nearest $100, and fees that are greater than $100,000
are rounded to the nearest $1,000.
The proposed licensing flat fees are applicable for fee categories
K.1. through K.5. of Sec. 170.21, and fee categories 1.C., 1.D., 2.B.,
2.C., 3.A. through 3.S., 4.B. through 9.D., 10.B., 15.A. through 15.R.,
16, and 17 of Sec. 170.31. Applications filed on or after the
effective date of the FY 2010 final fee rule would be subject to the
revised fees in the final rule.
3. Administrative Amendments
In the FY 2009 final rule, Sec. 170.11, regarding fee exemptions
for special projects, was changed to simplify the language. The NRC is
proposing to modify the introductory text of paragraph (a)(1) to
clarify that this paragraph applies to special projects. There is no
change to the NRC's fee exemption policy.
In addition, the NRC is updating some of the program codes found
next to the materials users fee categories in Sec. 170.31. The program
codes were added in the FY 2008 final rule, and the NRC plans to update
the program codes as needed.
In summary, the NRC is proposing to make the following changes to
10 CFR part 170:
1. Establish a revised professional hourly rate to use in assessing
fees for specific services;
2. Revise the license application fees to reflect the proposed FY
2010 hourly rate; and
3. Make certain administrative changes for purposes of updating
some program codes and improving the clarity of the rule.

B. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 171: Annual Fees for Reactor Licenses and
Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses, Including Holders of
Certificates of Compliance, Registrations, and Quality Assurance
Program Approvals and Government Agencies Licensed by the NRC

The NRC proposes to recover its fee-relief shortfall by increasing
all licensees' annual fees. This rulemaking also proposes to make
changes to the number of NRC licensees and to establish rebaselined
annual fees based on Public Law 111-85. The proposed amendments are
described as follows:
1. Application of Fee-Relief and Low-Level Waste Surcharge
The NRC is proposing to recover its fee-relief shortfall by
increasing all licensees' annual fees, based on their percent of the
budget.
The NRC applies the 10 percent of its budget that is excluded from
fee recovery under OBRA-90, as amended (fee relief), to offset the
total budget allocated for activities which do not directly benefit
current NRC licensees. The budget for these fee-relief activities is
totaled and then reduced by the amount of the NRC's fee relief. Any
difference between the fee relief and the budgeted amount of these
activities results in a fee-relief adjustment (increase or decrease) to
all licensees' annual fees, based on their percent of the budget (i.e.,
over 80 percent is allocated to power reactors each year).
In FY 2010, the NRC's 10 percent fee relief is less than the total
budget for fee-relief activities by $7.1 million. In FY 2009, the 10
percent fee relief exceeded the total budget by $3.2 million. The FY
2010 budget for fee-relief activities is higher than FY 2009, primarily
due to an increase in small entity subsidies, non-profit educational
exemptions, and regulatory support to Agreement States.
The NRC is increasing all licensees' annual fees to recover the
shortfall amount of $7.1 million, based on their percent of the fee
recoverable budget authority. This is consistent with the existing fee
methodology, in that the fee-relief shortfall amount is allocated to
licensees in the same manner as benefits are allocated as a reduction
when the NRC receives enough fee relief to pay for fee-relief
activities. In FY 2010, the power reactors class of licensees will be
allocated approximately 88 percent of the fee-relief shortfall based on
their share of the NRC fee recoverable budget authority.
The FY 2010 budgeted resources for NRC's fee-relief activities are
$108.5 million. The NRC's total fee relief in FY 2010 is $101.4
million, leaving a $7.1 million fee-relief shortfall to be recovered by
increasing all licensees' annual fees. These values are shown in Table
III. (Individual values may not sum to totals due to rounding.)

Table III--Fee-Relief Activities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
budgeted costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Activities not attributable to an existing NRC
licensee or class of licensee:
a. International activities......................... $18.2
b. Agreement State oversight........................ 11.2
c. Scholarships and Fellowships..................... 15.0

[[Page 11380]]

2. Activities not assessed part 170 licensing and
inspection fees or part 171 annual fees based on
existing law or Commission policy:
a. Fee exemption for nonprofit educational 17.4
institutions.......................................
b. Costs not recovered from small entities under 10 6.1
CFR 171.16(c)......................................
c. Regulatory support to Agreement States........... 23.1
d. Generic decommissioning/reclamation (not related 15.1
to the power reactor and spent fuel storage fee
classes)...........................................
e. In situ leach rulemaking and unregistered general 2.4
licensees..........................................
---------------
Total fee-relief activities..................... $108.5
Less 10 percent of NRC's FY 2010 total budget (less non- -101.4
fee items).............................................
---------------
Fee-Relief Adjustment to be Allocated to All Licensees' $7.1
Annual Fees............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table IV shows how the NRC is allocating the $7.1 million fee-
relief adjustment to each license fee class. As explained previously,
the NRC is allocating this fee-relief adjustment to each license fee
class based on the percent of the budget for that fee class compared to
the NRC's total budget. The fee-relief adjustment is added to the
required annual fee recovery from each fee class.
Separately, the NRC has continued to allocate the low-level waste
(LLW) surcharge based on the volume of LLW disposal of three classes of
licenses: operating reactors, fuel facilities, and materials users.
Table IV also shows the allocation of the LLW surcharge activity.
Because LLW activities support NRC licensees, the costs of these
activities are recovered through annual fees. For FY 2010, the total
budget allocated for LLW activity is $2.3 million. (Individual values
may not sum to totals due to rounding.)

Table IV--Allocation of Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LLW surcharge Fee-relief adjustment Total
----------------------------------------------------------------
Percent $M Percent $M $M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Power Reactors....................... 54.0 1.3 87.8 6.3 7.5
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning..... ........... ........... 2.7 0.2 0.2
Test and Research Reactors..................... ........... ........... 0.2 0.0 0.0
Fuel Facilities................................ 15.0 0.3 5.5 0.4 0.7
Materials Users................................ 31.0 0.7 2.6 0.2 0.9
Transportation................................. ........... ........... 0.5 0.0 0.0
Uranium Recovery............................... ........... ........... 0.7 0.1 0.1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... 100.0 2.3 100.0 7.1 9.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Agreement State Activities
New Jersey became the 37th Agreement State, effective September 30,
2009. Materials licenses transferred to a new Agreement State are
terminated by the NRC. New Jersey assumed regulatory authority for
approximately 500 former NRC licensees. To mitigate the impact on the
annual fee for the remaining small materials NRC licensees a larger
share of the generic budget resources for small materials licensees
will be allocated to the Regulatory Support to Agreement States fee-
relief category, as seen in Table III.
Note that the continuing costs of oversight and regulatory support
for the State of New Jersey, as for any other Agreement State, are
recovered as fee-relief activities, consistent with existing policy.
The budgeted resources for the regulatory support of Agreement State
licensees are prorated to the fee-relief activity, based on the percent
of total licensees in Agreement States. The NRC has updated the
proration percentage in its fee calculation to make sure that resources
are allocated equitably between the NRC materials users fee class and
the regulatory support to Agreement States fee-relief category.
Accordingly, as a result of the State of New Jersey becoming an
Agreement State, the NRC has increased the percentage of materials
users regulatory support costs prorated to the fee-relief activity from
85 percent in FY 2009 to 87 percent in FY 2010. The resources for
licensing and inspection activities supporting NRC licensees in the
materials users fee class are not prorated to the fee-relief activity.
3. Revised Annual Fees
The NRC is proposing to revise its annual fees in '' 171.15 and
171.16 for FY 2010 to recover approximately 90 percent of the NRC's FY
2010 budget authority, after subtracting the non-fee amounts and the
estimated amount to be recovered through part 170 fees. The part 170
estimate for this proposed rule increased by $30.1 million from the FY
2009 fee rule, based on the latest invoice data available. The total
amount to be recovered through annual fees for FY 2010 is $547.1
million. The required annual fee collection in FY 2009 was $532.6
million.
The Commission has determined (71 FR 30721; May 30, 2006) that the
agency should proceed with a presumption in favor of rebaselining when
calculating annual fees each year. Under this method, the NRC's budget
is analyzed in detail and budgeted resources are allocated to fee
classes and categories of licensees. The Commission expects that most
years there will be budgetary and

[[Page 11381]]

other changes that warrant the use of the rebaselining method.
As compared with FY 2009 annual fees, rebaselined fees are higher
for five classes of licensees (power reactors, spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning, transportation, uranium recovery and materials
users), and lower for one class of licensees (non-power reactors).
Within the fuel facilities fee class, annual fees for most licensees
increase, while the annual fee for one fee category decreases.
The NRC's total fee recoverable budget, as mandated by law, is
approximately $41.5 million larger in FY 2010 as compared with FY 2009.
Much of this increase is in response to increased activities for
reactor oversight, new reactor programs, information technology
support, homeland security issues, and licensing reviews for fuel
facilities, non-power reactors, and spent fuel storage. The FY 2010
budget was allocated to the fee classes that the budgeted activities
support. As in FY 2009, generic NRC resources supporting new uranium
recovery applications are included in the budget allocated to operating
power reactors and fuel facility fee classes, because these licensees
will potentially benefit from increased production of uranium milled by
new uranium recovery facilities. The impact of this allocation on the
operating reactors and fuel facilities annual fees is less than one
percent.
The factors affecting all annual fees include the distribution of
budgeted costs to the different classes of licenses (based on the
specific activities the NRC will perform in FY 2010), the estimated
part 170 collections for the various classes of licenses, and
allocation of the fee-relief adjustment to all fee classes. The
percentage of the NRC's budget not subject to fee recovery remained at
10 percent from FY 2009 to FY 2010.
Table V shows the rebaselined annual fees for FY 2010 for a
representative list of categories of licenses. The FY 2009 fee is also
shown for comparative purposes.

Table V--Rebaselined Annual Fees for FY 2010
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Class/Category of licenses FY 2009 proposed
annual fee annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Power Reactors (Including $4,625,000 $4,719,000
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor
Decommissioning Annual Fee)............
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor 122,000 143,000
Decommissioning........................
Test and Research Reactors (Non-power 87,600 81,800
Reactors)..............................
High Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility..... 4,691,000 5,442,000
Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility...... 1,649,000 2,048,000
UF6 Conversion Facility................. 969,000 1,112,000
Conventional Mills...................... 31,200 38,300
Typical Materials Users:
Radiographers (Category 3O)......... 22,700 28,200
Well Loggers (Category 5A).......... 9,700 12,000
Gauge Users (Category 3P)........... 3,700 4,500
Broad Scope Medical (Category 7B)... 36,300 45,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The work papers which support this proposed rule show in detail the
allocation of NRC's budgeted resources for each class of licenses and
how the fees are calculated. The reports included in these work papers
summarize the FY 2010 budgeted FTE and contract dollars allocated to
each fee class and fee-relief category at the planned activity and
program level and compare these allocations to those used to develop
the final FY 2009 fees. The work papers are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID: NRC-2009-0333 and
at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at Web site
address https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The work papers may
also be examined at the NRC PDR located at One White Flint North, Room
O-1F22, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The budgeted costs allocated to each class of licenses and the
calculations of the rebaselined fees are described in paragraphs a.
through h. of this section. Individual values in the Tables presented
in this section may not sum to totals due to rounding.
a. Fuel Facilities
The FY 2010 budgeted cost to be recovered in the annual fees
assessment to the fuel facility class of licenses [which includes
licensees in fee categories 1.A.(1)(a), 1.A.(1)(b), 1.A.(2)(a),
1.A.(2)(b), 1.A.(2)(c), 1.E., and 2.A.(1), under Sec. 171.16] is
approximately $28.8 million. This value is based on the full cost of
budgeted resources associated with all activities that support this fee
class, which is reduced by estimated part 170 collections and adjusted
for allocated generic transportation resources and fee-relief. In FY
2010, the LLW surcharge for fuel facilities is added to the allocated
fee-relief adjustment (see Table IV in Section II.B.1., ``Application
of Fee-Relief and Low-Level Waste Surcharge'' of this document). The
summary calculations used to derive this value are presented in Table
VI for FY 2010, with FY 2009 values shown for comparison.

Table VI--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Fuel Facilities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final proposed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $44.6 $48.8
Less estimated part 170 receipts........ -22.0 -21.2
-------------------------------
Net part 171 resources.................. $22.6 $27.6
Allocated generic transportation........ + 0.4 + 0.5
Fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge..... + 0.2 + 0.7

[[Page 11382]]

Billing adjustments..................... -0.2 -0.1
-------------------------------
Total required annual fee recovery.. $23.0 $28.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The increase in total budgeted resources allocated to this fee
class from FY 2009 to FY 2010 is primarily due to increased support for
environmental reviews and for licensing amendments and renewals for
existing fuel fabrication facilities. This is partially offset by
reductions in fuel facility inspections and licensing and inspection
activities for enrichment facilities.
The total required annual fee recovery amount is allocated to the
individual fuel facility licensees, based on the effort/fee
determination matrix developed for the FY 1999 final fee rule (64 FR
31447; June 10, 1999). In the matrix included in the publicly available
NRC work papers, licensees are grouped into categories according to
their licensed activities (i.e., nuclear material enrichment,
processing operations, and material form) and the level, scope, depth
of coverage, and rigor of generic regulatory programmatic effort
applicable to each category from a safety and safeguards perspective.
This methodology can be applied to determine fees for new licensees,
current licensees, licensees in unique license situations, and
certificate holders.
This methodology is adaptable to changes in the number of licensees
or certificate holders, licensed or certified material and/or
activities, and total programmatic resources to be recovered through
annual fees. When a license or certificate is modified, it may result
in a change of category for a particular fuel facility licensee, as a
result of the methodology used in the fuel facility effort/fee matrix.
Consequently, this change may also have an effect on the fees assessed
to other fuel facility licensees and certificate holders. For example,
if a fuel facility licensee amends its license/certificate (e.g.,
decommissioning or license termination) that results in it not being
subject to part 171 costs applicable to the fee class, then the
budgeted costs for the safety and/or safeguards components will be
spread among the remaining fuel facility licensees/certificate holders.
The methodology is applied as follows. First, a fee category is
assigned, based on the nuclear material and activity authorized by
license or certificate. Although a licensee/certificate holder may
elect not to fully use a license/certificate, the license/certificate
is still used as the source for determining authorized nuclear material
possession and use/activity. Second, the category and license/
certificate information are used to determine where the licensee/
certificate holder fits into the matrix. The matrix depicts the
categorization of licensees/certificate holders by authorized material
types and use/activities.
Each year, the NRC's fuel facility project managers and regulatory
analysts determine the level of effort associated with regulating each
of these facilities. This is done by assigning, for each fuel facility,
separate effort factors for the safety and safeguards activities
associated with each type of regulatory activity. The matrix includes
ten types of regulatory activities, including enrichment and scrap/
waste-related activities (see the work papers for the complete list).
Effort factors are assigned as follows: one (low regulatory effort),
five (moderate regulatory effort), and ten (high regulatory effort).
These effort factors are then totaled for each fee category, so that
each fee category has a total effort factor for safety activities and a
total effort factor for safeguards activities.
The effort factors for the various fuel facility fee categories are
summarized in Table VII. The value of the effort factors shown, as well
as the percent of the total effort factor for all fuel facilities,
reflects the total regulatory effort for each fee category (not per
facility). Note that the total effort factors for the High Enriched
Uranium Fuel (HEU), Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (LEU), Hot Cell and
Uranium Enrichment fee categories have increased from FY 2009, while
the Limited Operations fee category decreased from FY 2009. The safety
and safeguards factors increased in FY 2010 to reflect process changes,
such as emphasis on emergency planning, ongoing uranium enrichment
activities, and a new facility in the Uranium Enrichment fee category.
The safety factor decreases for Low Enriched Uranium Fuel and Limited
Operations fee categories in FY 2010 reflect the lower level of safety
issues at two facilities. Taking into account the addition of a new
facility, the total safety and safeguards effort factor change is
relatively small.

Table VII--Effort Factors for Fuel Facilities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effort factors (percent of
Number of total)
Facility type (fee category) facilities -------------------------------
Safety Safeguards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a))......................... 2 89 (32.5) 97 (44.3)
Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)).......................... 3 70 (25.5) 35 (16.0)
Limited Operations (1.A.(2)(a))................................. 1 8 (2.9) 4 (1.8)
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b))............ 1 3 (1.1) 15 (6.8)
Hot Cell (1.A.(2)(c))........................................... 1 6 (2.2) 3 (1.4)
Uranium Enrichment (1.E)........................................ 3 86 (31.4) 58 (26.5)
UF6 Conversion (2.A.(1))........................................ 1 12 (4.4) 7 (3.2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 11383]]

For FY 2010, the total budgeted resources for safety activities,
before the fee-relief adjustment is made, is $15,621,739. This amount
is allocated to each fee category based on its percent of the total
regulatory effort for safety activities. For example, if the total
effort factor for safety activities for all fuel facilities is 100, and
the total effort factor for safety activities for a given fee category
is 10, that fee category will be allocated 10 percent of the total
budgeted resources for safety activities. Similarly, the budgeted
resources amount of $12,485,988 for safeguards activities is allocated
to each fee category based on its percent of the total regulatory
effort for safeguards activities. The fuel facility fee class' portion
of the fee-relief adjustment ($740,427) is allocated to each fee
category based on its percent of the total regulatory effort for both
safety and safeguards activities. The annual fee per licensee is then
calculated by dividing the total allocated budgeted resources for the
fee category by the number of licensees in that fee category as
summarized in Table VIII.

Table VIII--Annual Fees for Fuel Facilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Facility type (fee category) annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a))................. $5,442,000
Low Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)).................. 2,048,000
Limited Operations Facility (1.A.(2)(a))................ 702,000
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b)).... 1,053,000
Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c))...................... 527,000
Uranium Enrichment (1.E.)............................... 2,809,000
UF6 Conversion (2.A.(1))................................ 1,112,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NRC expects to authorize operation of one new uranium
enrichment facility in FY 2010. The annual fee applicable to any type
of new uranium enrichment facility is the annual fee in Sec. 171.16,
fee category 1.E., Uranium Enrichment, unless the NRC establishes a new
fee category for the facility in a subsequent rulemaking. The
applicable annual fee for a facility that is authorized to operate
during the FY will be prorated in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. 171.17.
b. Uranium Recovery Facilities
The total FY 2010 budgeted costs to be recovered through annual
fees assessed to the uranium recovery class [which includes licensees
in fee categories 2.A.(2)(a), 2.A.(2)(b), 2.A.(2)(c), 2.A.(2)(d),
2.A.(2)(e), 2.A.(3), 2.A.(4), 2.A.(5) and 18.B., under Sec. 171.16],
is approximately $0.91 million. The derivation of this value is shown
in Table IX, with FY 2009 values shown for comparison purposes.

Table IX--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Uranium Recovery
Facilities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final proposed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $7.21 $6.69
Less estimated part 170 receipts........ -6.64 -5.83
-------------------------------
Net part 171 resources.............. $0.57 $0.86
Allocated generic transportation........ N/A N/A
Fee-relief adjustment................... -0.03 +0.05
Billing adjustments..................... -0.03 -0.01
-------------------------------
Total required annual fee recovery.. $0.51 $0.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The increase in the total required annual fee recovery is mainly
due to increased support for uranium recovery legal and program
infrastructure and the increased fee-relief adjustment, which was a
reduction in FY 2009. As in FY 2009, the NRC is proposing to exclude
the generic budgeted resources supporting applications for new uranium
recovery facilities from the FY 2010 annual fee charged to current
uranium recovery licensees. Because operating reactors and fuel
facility licensees would potentially benefit from increased production
of the uranium milled by the new facilities, the budgeted resources
would be allocated to these fee classes. The generic resources
supporting the new uranium recovery facilities do not benefit the
existing uranium recovery licensees.
Since FY 2002, the NRC has computed the annual fee for the uranium
recovery fee class by allocating the total annual fee amount for this
fee class between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the other
licensees in this fee class. The NRC regulates DOE's Title I and Title
II activities under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
(UMTRCA). The Congress established the two programs, Title I and Title
II under UMTRCA, to protect the public and the environment from uranium
milling. The UMTRCA Title I program is for remedial action at abandoned
mill tailings sites where tailings resulted largely from production of
uranium for the weapons program. The NRC also regulates DOE's UMTRCA
Title II program which is directed toward uranium mill sites licensed
by the NRC or Agreement States in or after 1978.
In FY 2010, 35 percent of the total annual fee amount, less
$419,769 specifically budgeted for Title I activities, is allocated to
DOE's UMTRCA facilities. The budgeted resources for Title I activities
increased in FY 2010 primarily due to additional Title I sites. The
remaining 65 percent of the total annual fee (less the amounts
specifically budgeted for Title I activities) is allocated to other
licensees. This is the same as in FY 2009. The remaining $317,000
(rounded) would be recovered through annual fees assessed to the other
licensees in this fee class (i.e., conventional uranium mills and heap
leach facilities, uranium solution mining and resin in-situ recovery
(ISR) facilities, mill tailings disposal facilities (11e.(2) disposal
facilities), and uranium water treatment facilities).
The annual fee being assessed to DOE includes recovery of the costs
specifically budgeted for NRC's Title I activities, plus 35 percent of
the remaining annual fee amount, including the fee-relief and generic/
other costs, for the uranium recovery class. The remaining 65 percent
of the fee-relief and generic/other costs are assessed to the other NRC
licensees in this fee class that are subject to annual fees. The costs
to be recovered through annual fees assessed to the uranium recovery
class are shown in Table X.

[[Page 11384]]

Table X--Costs Recovered Through Annual Fees; Uranium Recovery Fee Class
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE Annual Fee Amount (UMTRCA Title I and Title II)
general licenses:
UMTRCA Title I budgeted costs..................... $419,769
35 percent of generic/other uranium recovery 151,950
budgeted costs...................................
35 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief +18,533
adjustment.......................................
-----------------
Total Annual Fee Amount for DOE (rounded)..... 590,000
Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium Recovery Licenses:
65 percent of generic/other uranium recovery 282,193
budgeted costs less the amounts specifically
budgeted for Title I activities..................
65 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief +34,419
adjustment.......................................
-----------------
Total Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium $316,612
Recovery Licenses............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NRC will continue to use a matrix (which is included in the
supporting work papers) to determine the level of effort associated
with conducting the generic regulatory actions for the different (non-
DOE) licensees in this fee class. The weights derived in this matrix
are used to allocate the approximately $317,000 annual fee amount to
these licensees. The use of this uranium recovery annual fee matrix was
established in the FY 1995 final fee rule (60 FR 32217; June 20, 1995).
The FY 2010 matrix is described as follows.
First, the methodology identifies the categories of licenses
included in this fee class (besides DOE). In FY 2010, these categories
are conventional uranium mills and heap leach facilities, uranium
solution mining and resin ISR facilities, mill tailings disposal
facilities (11e.(2) disposal facilities), and uranium water treatment
facilities.
Second, the matrix identifies the types of operating activities
that support and benefit these licensees. In FY 2010, the activities
related to generic decommissioning/reclamation are not included in the
matrix, because they are included in the fee-relief activities.
Therefore, they are not a factor in determining annual fees. The
activities included in the FY 2010 matrix are operations, waste
operations, and groundwater protection. The relative weight of each
type of activity is then determined, based on the regulatory resources
associated with each activity. The operations, waste operations, and
groundwater protection activities have weights of 0, 5, and 10,
respectively, in the FY 2010 matrix.
Each year, the NRC determines the level of benefit to each licensee
for generic uranium recovery program activities for each type of
generic activity in the matrix. This is done by assigning, for each fee
category, separate benefit factors for each type of regulatory activity
in the matrix. Benefit factors are assigned on a scale of 0 to 10 as
follows: Zero (no regulatory benefit), five (moderate regulatory
benefit), and ten (high regulatory benefit). These benefit factors are
first multiplied by the relative weight assigned to each activity
(described previously). Total benefit factors by fee category, and per
licensee in each fee category, are then calculated. These benefit
factors thus reflect the relative regulatory benefit associated with
each licensee and fee category. The NRC expects to license an In Situ
Recovery Resin Facility in FY 2010. Therefore, the benefit factors for
fee category 2.A.(2)(d) have been included in the FY 2010 matrix, and
an annual fee has been established.
The benefit factors per licensee and per fee category, for each of
the non-DOE fee categories included in the uranium recovery fee class,
are as follows:

Table XI--Benefit Factors for Uranium Recovery Licenses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit
Number of Benefit factor
Fee category licensees factor per Total value percent
licensee total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conventional and Heap Leach mills........................... 1 200 200 12
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities........................... 5 190 950 57
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities........................ 1 215 215 13
In Situ Recovery Resin Facilities........................... 1 180 180 11
11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites...... 1 65 65 4
Uranium water treatment..................................... 1 45 45 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The annual fee per licensee is calculated by dividing the total
allocated budgeted resources for the fee category by the number of
licensees in that fee category, as summarized in Table XII. Applying
these factors to the approximately $317,000 in budgeted costs to be
recovered from non-DOE uranium recovery licensees results in the
following annual fees for FY 2010:

Table XII--Annual Fees for Uranium Recovery Licensees
[Other than DOE]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Facility type (fee category) annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conventional and Heap Leach mills (2.A.(2)(a)).......... $38,300
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(b)).......... 36,300
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(c))....... 41,100
In Situ Recovery Resin facilities (2.A.(2)(d)).......... 34,400
11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites 12,400
(2.A.(4))..............................................

[[Page 11385]]

Uranium water treatment (2.A.(5))....................... 8,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------

c. Operating Power Reactors
The $475.9 million in budgeted costs to be recovered through FY
2010 annual fees assessed to the power reactor class was calculated as
shown in Table XIII. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison.

Table XIII--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Operating Power
Reactors
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010
Summary fee calculations FY 2009 final proposed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $761.5 $787.3
Less estimated part 170 receipts........ -288.8 -318.7
-------------------------------
Net part 171 resources.............. $472.7 $468.6
Allocated generic transportation........ +0.9 +0.8
Fee-relief adjustment/LLW surcharge..... -1.6 +7.5
Billing adjustments..................... -3.6 -1.0
-------------------------------
Total required annual fee recovery.. $468.3 $475.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The budgeted costs to be recovered through annual fees to power
reactors are divided equally among the 104 power reactors licensed to
operate. This results in a FY 2010 annual fee of $4,576,000 per
reactor, of which approximately $72,300 is the fee-relief adjustment/
LLW surcharge. Additionally, each power reactor licensed to operate
would be assessed the FY 2010 spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning annual fee of $143,000. This results in a total FY 2010
annual fee of $4,719,000 for each power reactor licensed to operate.
The annual fee for power reactors is higher in FY 2010 than in FY
2009, primarily due to increased budgeted resources for licensing,
international, oversight, and new reactor activities, and the increased
fee-relief adjustment, which was a reduction in FY 2009. This increase
is partially offset by a decrease in budgeted resources for incident
response activities and higher estimated part 170 collections. The
annual fees for power reactors are presented in Sec. 171.15.
d. Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning
For FY 2010, budgeted costs of approximately $17.6 million for
spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning are to be recovered through
annual fees assessed to 10 CFR part 50 power reactors, and to part 72
licensees who do not hold a part 50 license. Those reactor licensees
that have ceased operations and have no fuel onsite are not subject to
these annual fees. Table XIV shows the calculation of this annual fee
amount. FY 2009 values are shown for comparison.

Table XIV--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for the Spent Fuel Storage/
Reactor Decommissioning Fee Class
[Dollars in millions]
-----------------------------

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.