Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 10690-10692 [2010-4967]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
10690
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
156.6 MHz—(channel 12)—Working
(U.S. Stations in Sector 2 of the River).
156.55 MHz—(channel 11)—Working
(Canadian Stations in Sector 3, Lake
Ontario and Lake Erie).
■
5. Revise § 401.63 to read as follows:
§ 401.63
Radio Procedures.
Every vessel shall use the channels of
communication in each control sector as
listed in the table to this section.
CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION
Control
sector
number
Station
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Seaway
Beauharnois .....
Eisenhower .......
Iroquois .............
Clayton .............
Sodus ...............
Newcastle .........
Welland ............
Long Point ........
Sector limits
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
7
Call in
C.I.P No. 2 to C.I.P No. 6–7 .......................................
C.I.P. No. 6–7 to C.I.P. No. 10–11 .............................
C.I.P. No. 10–11 To Crossover Island ........................
Crossover Island to Cape Vincent ..............................
Cape Vincent to Mid Lake Ontario ..............................
Mid Lake Ontario To C.I.P. No. 15 .............................
C.I.P. No. 15 to C.I.P. No. 16 .....................................
C.I.P. No. 16 to Long Point .........................................
6. In § 401.90, add a new paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
■
7. In § 401.94, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 401.90
§ 401.94
■
Boarding for inspections.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Vessels shall provide a safe and
approved means of boarding. Pigeon
holes are not accepted as a means of
boarding and an alternate safe means of
access shall be provided.
Keeping copies of documents.
(a) A copy of these Regulations
(subpart A of part 401), a copy of the
vessel’s valid Vessel Inspection Report
and the Seaway Notices for the current
navigation year shall be kept on board
every vessel in transit. For the purposes
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
14
12
11
13
12
11
14
11
Work
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
14
12
11
13
12
11
14
11
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Listening
watch
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
Ch.
14.
12.
11.
13.
16.
16.
14.
16.
of this section, a copy may be kept in
either paper or electronic format so long
as it can be accessed in the wheelhouse.
*
*
*
*
*
8. In Schedule III to Subpart A—
Calling-in table, revise sections
numbered (18), (35), and (36) to read as
follows:
■
SCHEDULE III TO SUBPART A OF PART 401—CALLING-IN TABLE
C.I.P. and checkpoint
Station to call
*
*
18. Sodus Point ................................................
*
*
*
Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 .............................
*
1. Name of Vessel.
2. Location.
3. ETA Mid-Lake Ontario.
*
*
*
35. Mid-Lake Ontario-Entering Sector 4 ...........
*
*
*
Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 .............................
2. Location.
Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 .............................
*
1. Name of Vessel.
*
36. Sodus Point ................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Issued at Washington, DC, on March 3,
2010.
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation.
Collister Johnson, Jr.,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–4898 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–61–P
Message content
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0859; FRL–9123–3]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:30 Mar 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
1. Name of Vessel.
2. Location.
3. Updated ETA Cape Vincent or Lake Ontario
Port.
4. Confirm River Pilot Requirement.
5. Pilot requirement—Snell Lock and/or Upper
Beauharnois Lock. (inland vessels only).
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on December 18, 2009 and
concern reduction of animal matter and
volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from crude oil production,
cutback asphalt, and petroleum solvent
dry cleaning. We are approving local
rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on April 8, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0859 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
ADDRESSES:
Local agency
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
4104
4404
4641
4672
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67154),
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP.
Amended
Reduction of Animal Matter ..........................................................................
Heavy Oil Test Station—Kern County ..........................................................
Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance
Operations.
Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaning Operations ...............................................
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. We did not
receive any comments on the proposed
action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the
relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, EPA is fully approving these rules
into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
16:00 Mar 08, 2010
Table of Contents
Rule title
SJVAPCD .........
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanne Wells, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4118, wells.joanne@epa.gov.
Rule No.
SJVAPCD .........
SJVAPCD .........
SJVAPCD .........
VerDate Nov<24>2008
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Jkt 220001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10691
Submitted
12/17/92
12/17/92
12/17/92
8/24/07
8/24/07
8/24/07
12/17/92
8/24/07
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 10, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
10692
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 12, 2010.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(351) (i)(C) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(351) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 4104, ‘‘Reduction of Animal
Matter,’’ Rule 4404, ‘‘Heavy Oil Test
Station—Kern County,’’ adopted May
21, 1992 and amended on December 17,
1992.
(2) Rule 4641, ‘‘Cutback, Slow Cure,
and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and
Maintenance Operations,’’ Rule 4672,
‘‘Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaning
Operations,’’ adopted April 11, 1991 and
amended on December 17, 1992.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–4967 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 10–340; MB Docket No. 10–21; RM–
11590]
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television Broadcasting Services;
Birmingham, AL
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR Part 73 as
follows:
■
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Commission has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by
Alabama Educational Television
Commission, the licensee of
noncommercial educational station
WBIQ(TV), channel *10, Birmingham,
Alabama, requesting the substitution of
channel *39 for channel *10 at
Birmingham.
DATES:
This rule is effective March 9,
2010.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Mar 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 10–21,
adopted February 26, 2010, and released
March 2, 2010. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/). This document
may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via the company’s
Web site, https://www.bcipweb.com. To
request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty).
This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
information collection burden ‘‘for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding.
The Commission will send a copy of
this Report and Order in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.622
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments
under Alabama, is amended by adding
■
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
channel *39 and removing channel *10
at Birmingham.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010–4980 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 80
[WT Docket No. 04–257 and RM–10743; FCC
10–6]
Maritime Communications
ACTION:
Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission published in the Federal
Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR
5241), a document in the Maritime
Radio Services, WT Docket No. 04–257,
which included a Final Rules Appendix
that reflected the amended adoption of
a certain rule. This document corrects
the amendment of that section as set
forth below.
DATES: March 9, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stana Kimball, Mobility Division,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
at Stanislava.Kimball@FCC.gov or at
(202) 418–1306, or TTY (202) 418–7233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Communications Commission
published a document in the Federal
Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR
5241) to ensure that its rules governing
the Maritime Radio Services continue to
promote maritime safety, maximize
effective and efficient use of the
spectrum available for maritime
communications, accommodate
technological innovation, avoid
unnecessary regulatory burdens, and
maintain consistency with international
maritime standards to the extent
consistent with the United States public
interest. This document corrects a rule
amendment set forth in the document
published in the Federal Register of
February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241).
In rule FR Doc. 2010–2095 published
on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241), make
the following correction:
§ 80.385
[Corrected]
On page 5241, in the third column,
revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
‘‘(a) * * *
(1) The Automated Maritime
Communications System (AMTS) is an
automated maritime
telecommunications system.’’
■
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10690-10692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4967]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0859; FRL-9123-3]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were
proposed in the Federal Register on December 18, 2009 and concern
reduction of animal matter and volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from crude oil production, cutback asphalt, and petroleum
solvent dry cleaning. We are approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on April 8, 2010.
[[Page 10691]]
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0859 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne Wells, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4118, wells.joanne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67154), EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVAPCD........................... 4104 Reduction of Animal Matter.. 12/17/92 8/24/07
SJVAPCD........................... 4404 Heavy Oil Test Station--Kern 12/17/92 8/24/07
County.
SJVAPCD........................... 4641 Cutback, Slow Cure, and 12/17/92 8/24/07
Emulsified Asphalt, Paving
and Maintenance Operations.
SJVAPCD........................... 4672 Petroleum Solvent Dry 12/17/92 8/24/07
Cleaning Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We
did not receive any comments on the proposed action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rules comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
these rules into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 10, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 10692]]
Dated: February 12, 2010.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(351) (i)(C) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(351) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 4104, ``Reduction of Animal Matter,'' Rule 4404, ``Heavy
Oil Test Station--Kern County,'' adopted May 21, 1992 and amended on
December 17, 1992.
(2) Rule 4641, ``Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving
and Maintenance Operations,'' Rule 4672, ``Petroleum Solvent Dry
Cleaning Operations,'' adopted April 11, 1991 and amended on December
17, 1992.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-4967 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
