Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972; Correction, 10413-10414 [2010-4666]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
10413
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
No.’’ and adding in its place ‘‘CBP Dec.
10–01’’.
David V. Aguilar,
Acting Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection.
Approved: March 2, 2010.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2010–4783 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0436]
New Animal Drug Applications;
Confirmation of Effective Date
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation
of effective date.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is confirming the
effective date of March 8, 2010, for the
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of October 23, 2009 (74 FR
54749). The direct final rule amends the
regulations regarding new animal drug
applications (NADAs). Specifically, this
direct final rule is being issued to
provide that NADAs shall be submitted
in the described form, as appropriate for
the particular submission. Currently, the
regulation requires that all NADAs
contain the same informational sections
and does not explicitly provide the
appropriate flexibility needed to address
the development of all types of new
animal drug products. This amendment
will allow the agency to appropriately
review safety and effectiveness data
submitted to support the approval of
new animal drug products. This
document confirms the effective date of
the direct final rule.
DATES: Effective date confirmed: March
8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Urvi
Desai, Center for Veterinary Medicine
(HFV–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8297,
e-mail: urvi.desai@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of October 23, 2009 (74
FR 54749), FDA solicited comments
concerning the direct final rule for a 75day period ending January 6, 2010. FDA
stated that the effective date of the
direct final rule would be on March 8,
2010, 60 days after the end of the
comment period, unless any significant
adverse comment was submitted to FDA
during the comment period. FDA did
not receive any significant adverse
comments.
Authority: Therefore, under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of
Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 514 is
amended. Accordingly, the amendments
issued thereby are effective.
Dated: March 3, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS). The document
contained an incorrect hull number.
DATES: This correcting amendment is
effective March 8, 2010, and is
applicable beginning February 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
Need for Correction
In the Federal Register (75 FR 6858)
of February 12, 2010, in an amendment
to § 706.2 Table Five, an incorrect hull
number for the USS PHILIPPINE SEA
was presented.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Navy amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations by making the following
correcting amendment:
■
[FR Doc. 2010–4923 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972;
Correction
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
published a document in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2010,
concerning certifications and
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table
Five by revising the entry for USS
PHILIPPINE SEA (CG 58) to read as
follows:
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FIVE
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Vessel
Number
Masthead lights not over
all other lights and
obstructions. Annex I,
Section 2(f)
*
USS PHILIPPINE SEA
*
CG59 .......
*
........................................
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:59 Mar 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Forward masthead light
not in forward quarter of
ship. Annex I,
Section 3(a)
After masthead light less
than 1⁄2 ship’s length aft
of forward masthead
light. Annex I,
Section 3(a)
*
X
Fmt 4700
*
*
36.8
*
*
X
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
Percentage horizontal
separation attained
08MRR1
10414
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
Approved: February 22, 2010.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: February 24, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingam,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–4666 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1254
[FDMS Docket NARA–09–004]
RIN 3095–AB59
Researcher Identification Card
AGENCY: National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Final rule.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: NARA is amending its
regulations to require researchers using
original records, NARA microfilm, and
public use computers at the National
Archives Building in Washington, DC,
to obtain a researcher identification
card. Under the new requirements,
researchers at regional archives are also
required to obtain a researcher
identification card when there is no
separate research room for the use of
microfilm and public access computers.
DATES: This rule is effective April 7,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Redman at telephone number
301–837–3174 or fax number 301–837–
0319.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 25, 2009, NARA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(74 FR 48892) for a 60-day public
comment period. The proposed rule
required researchers using original
records, NARA microfilm, and public
use computers at the National Archives
Building in Washington, DC, to obtain a
researcher identification card.
Researchers at regional archives are also
required to obtain a researcher
identification card when there is no
separate research room for the use of
microfilm and public access computers.
The proposed rule also updated our
regulations to reflect changes in
available technology and research room
practices, such as abolishing the threehour time limit for using microfilm
readers. Six comments were received.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:59 Mar 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Of these, three basically supported the
changes. One commenter wrote that the
ID should include a requirement for an
approved form of Federal identification
before issuing the research card.
Currently, States are converting their
driver’s licenses to a single federallyapproved system. Our preferred form of
identification is either a driver’s license
or a passport for our foreign researchers.
We record these numbers as part of the
registration process. In some cases,
researchers do not have either type of
identification and present a school ID or
some other proof of address. In these
situations, it is not feasible to require a
federally-approved ID and we do not
have the right to limit one’s access to
Federal records based on the absence of
a Federally-approved ID. Of the other
comments, one suggested that we accept
the Library of Congress (LOC) researcher
identification card. We rejected this
comment because the Library of
Congress and NARA are not connected
administratively in any way. The
Library of Congress is in the Legislative
Branch and NARA is in the Executive
Branch. Federal regulations apply to
Executive Agencies only. Further, the
NARA identification card is tied to a
unique building security system shared
by the National Archives Building in
Washington, DC, and the National
Archives at College Park. Another
comment objected to having to carry
another card and questioned how a card
could make NARA more secure than
using another common form of
identification. Again, the application of
the identification card is how we
determine who is eligible to conduct
research in our facility. The other forms
of identification are required as proof of
address to permit researcher access. The
information must be standardized for
both security purposes and for
efficiently capturing administrative
information on the characteristics of our
users. Other forms of identification are
not compatible with the computer
system used for the registration process.
This commenter also suggested that
NARA record information from
identification provided by the
researcher upon each visit and that
NARA also capture additional
administrative information about each
visit at that point. We rejected this
comment because our current process is
an OMB-approved information
collection structured to minimize the
paperwork burden on the public as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. Another comment requested that
any denials of access be appealable to
the Archivist of the United States.
Federal regulation 36 CFR 1254.50
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
already makes the Archivist of the
United States the final determiner of
research access when it has been denied
at lower levels in the agency. Two
commenters expressed doubt that the
rule would improve security at the
National Archives Building. The
researcher identification cards are just
one of several means employed by
NARA that provide both physical and
personal security. Because the cards are
renewed annually, they provide the
most reliable contact information
available. Such information has proved
useful in investigations conducted by
the NARA Inspector General.
What changes are we making in this
rule?
We are making substantive changes by
amending the following sections:
• § 1254.6(b): We are adding the
requirement for researchers using the
National Archives Building, even those
only using microfilm publications or
public use computers, to apply for and
obtain a researcher identification card.
This rule applies to regional archives
facilities, as well, except where the
microfilm research area is separate from
the area where original records are used.
We made other changes in the text to
reflect that none of the affected facilities
has more than one textual research
room.
• § 1254.22(a): The term ‘‘bar-coded’’
is deleted and replaced with the broader
term ‘‘encoded.’’ We no longer use barcodes on researcher identification cards
in the Washington, DC, area. The plastic
cards we issue now have a magnetic
strip and future cards may use other
technology.
• § 1254.44(a): Because fewer
researchers are using microfilm and
there are no waits, the 3-hour limit on
use and waiting lists are no longer
needed for the use of microfilm readers.
We are removing references to the 3hour limit.
• § 1254.84: Since this section was
last revised, the researcher
identification card can be linked to a
personal account established through
the National Archives Trust Fund
Cashier’s Office and function as a debit
card in Washington, DC, area research
rooms. The regulation is being clarified
to describe that capability. In addition,
we are removing discussion of deposit
accounts, which are no longer
maintained by the Trust Fund.
We also are making non-substantive
editorial changes in §§ 1254.6(c) and
1254.10(b).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection in this
regulation was previously approved by
E:\FR\FM\08MRR1.SGM
08MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10413-10414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4666]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972; Correction
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy published a document in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2010, concerning certifications and exemptions
under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea,
1972 (72 COLREGS). The document contained an incorrect hull number.
DATES: This correcting amendment is effective March 8, 2010, and is
applicable beginning February 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook, JAGC,
U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson
Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066, telephone
number: 202-685-5040.
Need for Correction
In the Federal Register (75 FR 6858) of February 12, 2010, in an
amendment to Sec. 706.2 Table Five, an incorrect hull number for the
USS PHILIPPINE SEA was presented.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and Vessels.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Navy amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations by making the following
correcting amendment:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table Five by revising the entry for USS
PHILIPPINE SEA (CG 58) to read as follows:
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
Table Five
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After masthead light
Masthead lights not over Forward masthead light less than \1/2\ ship's
Vessel Number all other lights and not in forward quarter length aft of forward Percentage horizontal
obstructions. Annex I, of ship. Annex I, masthead light. Annex I, separation attained
Section 2(f) Section 3(a) Section 3(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS PHILIPPINE SEA............ CG59............ ........................ X X 36.8
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 10414]]
* * * * *
Approved: February 22, 2010.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
Dated: February 24, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingam,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-4666 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
