Wisconsin Statewide Habitat Conservation Plan for Karner Blue Butterfly, 10309-10311 [2010-4708]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices
mechanical thinning. A no-action
alternative was also evaluated.
Alternative 2 (Mixed Fire Treatment)
was selected as the preferred alternative.
The Record of Decision includes a
statement of the decision made,
synopses of other alternatives
considered, the basis for the decision, a
description of the environmentally
preferable alternative, a finding of no
impairment of park resources and
values, a listing of measures to
minimize environmental harm, and an
overview of public involvement in the
decision-making process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Marks, Project Lead, Fire
Management Plan, P.O. Box 129, Grand
Canyon, Arizona 86023,
christopher_marks@nps.gov or at
928–638–7417.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
the Record of Decision may be obtained
from the contact listed above or online
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/grca.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
Michael D. Snyder,
Regional Director, Intermountain Region,
National Park Service.
—Current FGDC Activities
—Review of FGDC Guidance/NGAC
Action Plan
The meeting will include an
opportunity for public comment on
March 25. Comments may also be
submitted to the NGAC in writing.
Members of the public who wish to
attend the meeting must register in
advance. Please register by contacting
Arista Maher at the U.S. Geological
Survey (703–648–6283,
amaher@usgs.gov). Registrations are due
by March 19, 2010. While the meeting
will be open to the public, seating may
be limited due to room capacity.
DATES: The meeting will be held from
8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on March 24 and
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on March 25.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Mahoney, U.S. Geological Survey (206–
220–4621).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings
of the National Geospatial Advisory
Committee are open to the public.
Additional information about the NGAC
and the meeting is available at https://
www.fgdc.gov/ngac.
Dated: March 1, 2010.
Ken Shaffer,
Deputy Executive Director, Federal
Geographic Data Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–4414 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. 2010–4664 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BILLING CODE 4311–AM–P
U.S. Geological Survey
Announcement of National Geospatial
Advisory Committee Meeting
AGENCY:
U.S. Geological Survey,
The National Geospatial
Advisory Committee (NGAC) will meet
on March 24–25, 2010 at the One
Washington Circle Hotel, 1 Washington
Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
The meeting will be held in the
Meridian Room. The NGAC, which is
composed of representatives from
governmental, private sector, non-profit,
and academic organizations, was
established to advise the Chair of the
Federal Geographic Data Committee on
management of Federal geospatial
programs, the development of the
National Spatial Data Infrastructure, and
the implementation of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–16. Topics to be addressed at
the meeting include:
—Welcome to New Committee Members
—NGAC Overview/History of Federal
Geospatial Coordination
—Leadership Dialogue
—Place-Based Policies
—Subcommittee Reports
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Mar 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2010–N004; 30120–1122–
0000–F2]
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Wisconsin Statewide Habitat
Conservation Plan for Karner Blue
Butterfly
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
environmental assessment and updated
habitat conservation plan in support of
an application to renew/amend
incidental take permit number
TE010064–5.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received
an application from the State of
Wisconsin, Department of Natural
Resources (Applicant), for renewal of an
incidental take permit (ITP) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act).
If approved, the permit would be for a
10-year period and would authorize
incidental take of the endangered
Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa
samuelis) throughout the State of
Wisconsin. We request public comment
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10309
on the application and associated
documents.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments on or
before May 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments via
U.S. mail to the Regional Director, Attn:
Lisa Mandell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 1 Federal
Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111–4056, or
by electronic mail to
permitsR3ES@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Mandell, (612) 713–5164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4371 et
seq.), we announce that we have
gathered the information necessary to:
(1) Determine the impacts and formulate
alternatives for an environmental
assessment related to renewal of an
incidental take permit for the Applicant;
and (2) approve the habitat conservation
plan (HCP), which provides measures to
minimize and mitigate the effects of the
proposed incidental take of the
Federally listed Karner blue butterfly to
the maximum extent practicable, under
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
If we renew the permit, we would
authorize take for 10 years in
conjunction with implementation of the
updated HCP which the applicant has
prepared. The applicant has been
operating under Fish and Wildlife
Permit TE010064 for a period of 10
years (1999–2009), and the incidental
take would continue throughout the
State of Wisconsin, if we renew the
permit. Incidental take occurs as a result
of impacts of otherwise lawful land use
and land management actions. These
activities have been altered under the
HCP to minimize and mitigate the
effects of incidental take of Karner blue
butterflies and the habitats upon which
they depend. We have issued an
environmental assessment to evaluate
the impacts of the alternatives for
renewal of the incidental take permit,
including the no action alternative.
In the 1990s, the State of Wisconsin
initiated a unique partnership with a
variety of land managers in Wisconsin
to develop a statewide HCP for the
Karner blue butterfly. For a period of
approximately 5 years, partners
gathered regularly and worked with the
Service on an innovative plan to
incorporate considerations for the
Karner blue butterfly into land-use
activities. Partners include the forest
industry, utility companies, road
management authorities, The Nature
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
10310
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices
Conservancy, and private landowners.
The effort culminated in September
1999 with the signing of an
Implementing Agreement and issuance
of an ITP. The DNR serves as the permit
holder and administers the
implementation of the Statewide plan.
At the outset, 26 partners were part of
the HCP. In the first 10 years of
implementation, the list of partners has
grown to 39 major land-management
entities.
In addition to the partners in this
effort, the DNR proposed and
implemented a unique approach to
include small landowners in the
conservation effort on a voluntary basis.
This voluntary strategy has proved to be
successful in garnering additional
conservation and protection of butterfly
habitat, without the ‘‘fear’’ sometimes
associated with government regulation.
Management protocols have been
refined, populations of butterflies have
increased and others discovered, and a
number of improvements resulted from
what has been learned through adaptive
management. This HCP has been lauded
as an innovative and successful
approach to endangered species
conservation.
The Karner blue butterfly depends on
ecological disturbance, which maintains
the early successional habitat in which
its specific host plant survives. Proper
management, with specific strategies to
conserve the butterfly, results in
increases of habitat and in the
population. In the case of this species,
cessation of habitat management and an
absence of natural wildfire regimes
would lead to habitat that would not
support survival of the species into the
future. Since the butterfly thrives in
concert with habitat manipulation and
management, it has been an ideal
species for a conservation plan.
The HCP has been updated to
consolidate the conservation measures
found in the original HCP and to allow
for easy access by partners
implementing the plan. In addition, the
DNR has developed an implementation
handbook, called the HCP User’s Guide,
which is available online. It includes
management protocols for a wide range
of covered activities, such as habitat
restoration, timber harvest, mowing, and
burning. To understand the breadth of
management activities that are
incorporated into the HCP, please visit
the DNR’s Web site at https://
www.dnr.state.wi.us/forestry/karner/
hcp-userguide.htm.
The updated draft HCP includes an
improved conservation program, a
focused effort on recovery properties to
enhance long-term survival and
recovery of the butterfly, biological
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Mar 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
modeling to predict butterfly occurrence
and flights, and improvements
concerning compliance monitoring and
reporting.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose for which we have
prepared an Environmental Assessment
is to respond to the applicant’s request
for an ITP renewal for the Karner blue
butterfly. This involves the continuation
of activities that have the potential to
result in incidental take of the butterfly
through implementation of the
Wisconsin Statewide HCP. The
applicant’s updated HCP balances the
long-term survival and recovery of the
species with resource management in
Wisconsin, allowing for otherwise
lawful activities to proceed, while
accommodating the needs of the
species. It ensures the long-term
survival of the species through
protection and proactive habitat
management and it ensures compliance
with the Act, NEPA, and other
applicable laws and regulations
pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Act and its implementing regulations
and policies.
Proposed Action
The requested duration of the ITP is
10 years. The plan is a Statewide
conservation plan and the ITP would
cover the take of the Karner blue
butterfly in Wisconsin. A map of the
species’ high potential range is included
on the Service’s Web site, referenced
below under Reviewing Documents and
Submitting Comments. Activities that
would continue to be covered under the
ITP include a variety of land
management activities. These include
forestry/timber harvest, right-of-way
management (mowing/brushing),
pesticide application, recreation
management, prescribed burning, snow
removal, and others. The proposed
action is the renewal of ITP Number
TE010064 to authorize take of the
Karner blue butterfly within the State of
Wisconsin, under section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act. Incidental take anticipated
under this permit application is specific
to the Karner blue butterfly in the form
of habitat impacts, direct take of
butterflies resulting from management
and direct take for completing research
and monitoring under the HCP. The
HCP provides measures to modify
activities to minimize and mitigate the
effects of the proposed incidental take.
The biological goal of the HCP is to
provide long-term suitable habitat for
the species. The restoration and
maintenance of suitable habitat and
ecosystem functions necessary to ensure
long-term viability of butterfly
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
populations ensures survival and
recovery of the species.
Alternatives
Two alternatives were fully evaluated
in the environmental assessment
prepared for this action, renewal of the
ITP and no action/denial of the permit.
One additional alternative, issuance of a
permit with additional measures
specified by the Service, was discussed
but eliminated from further
consideration. Renewal of the ITP for
another 10-year period would allow for
continued implementation of the HCP,
which has become the normal way of
doing business in Wisconsin. Partners
and other citizens in Wisconsin have
embraced conservation of the species
and have altered their activities
accordingly. The DNR has been an
effective administrator of this permit
since 1999 and has coordinated closely
with the Service to apply adaptive
management principles where needed.
Protocols have been developed for
additional types of activities and the
DNR has worked closely with the
implementation and oversight
committee, established in the HCP, to
effectively monitor compliance with the
program, both in terms of statutory
compliance and effectiveness in meeting
biological goals. For all intents and
purposes, forecasting the next 10 years
of implementation amounts to at least
the status quo and, more likely,
increased habitat for the butterfly.
Habitat management would continue to
be completed in a manner that
accommodates the needs of the Karner
blue butterfly, and the species would
continue to thrive and recover in
Wisconsin.
The no action alternative would result
in a denial of the request to renew the
ITP. In this case, the no action
alternative would actually result in a
larger change in the landscape and in
the implementation of conservation
activities for the Karner blue butterfly.
If the Statewide permit ceases to exist,
multiple landowners (at least 39, who
are now partners in the HCP) would be
in the position of needing to develop an
HCP and apply for a permit from the
Service. Each application would
undergo processing and review under
ESA and NEPA. Where butterflies
currently exist, habitat management that
incidentally takes butterflies could not
proceed. Vegetation succession would
follow and the plant community would
no longer support the Karner blue
butterfly. In addition, the small private
landowners who are currently covered
by the Statewide HCP would be subject
to ESA compliance wherever butterflies
exist. There would be a disincentive to
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices
managing the habitat to promote
persistence of the butterfly, and the
assurances they have received under the
current conservation program would
cease. Landowners who wish to
proactively conserve their land to
promote recovery of the butterfly in
Wisconsin would need their own
permits under Section 10, with an HCP
or Safe Harbor Agreement for their
lands.
Reviewing Documents and Submitting
Comments
Please refer to TE010064 when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. The permit application and
supporting documents (updated draft
HCP and draft EA) may be obtained on
the Internet at the following address:
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/
endangered/permits/hcp/r3hcps.html.
In addition, the original HCP, dated
March 2000, may be viewed on the
Wisconsin DNR Web site at https://
dnr.wi.gov/forestry/karner/. Persons
without access to the Internet may
obtain copies of the documents
(application, updated draft HCP, and
draft EA) by contacting the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Ecological
Services Field Office, 2661 Scott Tower
Drive, New Franken, WI 54229–9565
(920/866–1717, voice; 920/866–1710,
fax). The documents will also be
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the
Ecological Services Field Office in New
Franken and at the Service’s Regional
Office, Ecological Services, Bishop
Henry Whipple Federal Building, 1
Federal Drive, 6th Floor, Ft. Snelling,
MN 55111 (612/713–5164, voice; 612/
713–5292, fax). Written comments will
be accepted as described above.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become
part of the public record associated with
this action. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that the entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
available at any time. While you can ask
us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
Authority : We provide this notice under
section 10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations (50
CFR 17.22), and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371 et
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Mar 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
seq.) and its implementing regulations (40
CFR 1506.6).
T.J. Miller,
Acting, Assistant Regional Director,
Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling,
Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 2010–4708 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–631]
In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal
Display Devices and Products
Containing the Same; Notice of
Commission Determination To Rescind
a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease
and Desist Orders
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind
the limited exclusion order and cease
and desist orders issued in the abovecaptioned investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint A. Gerdine, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 25, 2008, based on a
complaint filed by Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Samsung’’) of Korea. 73 FR
4626–27. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10311
certain liquid crystal display (‘‘LCD’’)
devices and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,193,666; 6,771,344 (‘‘the ‘344 patent’’);
7,295,196; and 6,937,311 (‘‘the ‘311
patent’’). The complaint further alleged
the existence of a domestic industry as
to each asserted patent. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named the following respondents: Sharp
Corporation of Japan; Sharp Electronics
Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey;
and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing
Company of America, Inc. of San Diego,
California (collectively, ‘‘Sharp’’).
On January 26, 2009, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
his final initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
finding a violation of section 337 by
respondents as to the ‘311 and ‘344
patents only, and issued his
recommended determinations on
remedy and bonding. On February 9,
2009, Sharp and the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed
petitions for review of the final ID. The
IA and Samsung filed responses to the
petitions on February 17, 2009.
On March 30, 2009, the Commission
determined to review several of the ID’s
findings, and requested the parties to
respond to certain questions concerning
those findings. The Commission also
requested written submissions on the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding from the parties and
interested non-parties. 74 FR 15301–02
(April 3, 2009).
On April 10 and April 17, 2009,
respectively, complainant Samsung, the
Sharp respondents, and the IA filed
briefs and reply briefs on the issues for
which the Commission requested
written submissions. Also, the
Commission received four submissions
from interested non-parties on the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding.
On June 24, 2009, the Commission
issued notice of its determination to
affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part the ID.
The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s
finding of a violation of section 337
with respect to claims 7 and 8 of the
‘344 patent, but reversed the ALJ’s
finding of a violation with respect to the
‘311 patent. 74 FR 31311–12 (June 30,
2009)
Further, the Commission issued (as
modified on December 14, 2009): (1) A
limited exclusion order prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of LCD devices,
including display panels and modules,
and LCD televisions or professional
displays containing the same that
infringe claims 7 or 8 of the ‘344 patent,
that are manufactured abroad by or on
behalf of, or are imported by or on
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10309-10311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4708]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-ES-2010-N004; 30120-1122-0000-F2]
Wisconsin Statewide Habitat Conservation Plan for Karner Blue
Butterfly
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft environmental assessment and
updated habitat conservation plan in support of an application to
renew/amend incidental take permit number TE010064-5.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application from the State of Wisconsin, Department of
Natural Resources (Applicant), for renewal of an incidental take permit
(ITP) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act). If approved, the
permit would be for a 10-year period and would authorize incidental
take of the endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa
samuelis) throughout the State of Wisconsin. We request public comment
on the application and associated documents.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments on or
before May 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments via U.S. mail to the Regional
Director, Attn: Lisa Mandell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Ecological Services, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111-4056, or
by electronic mail to permitsR3ES@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Mandell, (612) 713-5164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4371
et seq.), we announce that we have gathered the information necessary
to: (1) Determine the impacts and formulate alternatives for an
environmental assessment related to renewal of an incidental take
permit for the Applicant; and (2) approve the habitat conservation plan
(HCP), which provides measures to minimize and mitigate the effects of
the proposed incidental take of the Federally listed Karner blue
butterfly to the maximum extent practicable, under section 10(a)(1)(B)
of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
If we renew the permit, we would authorize take for 10 years in
conjunction with implementation of the updated HCP which the applicant
has prepared. The applicant has been operating under Fish and Wildlife
Permit TE010064 for a period of 10 years (1999-2009), and the
incidental take would continue throughout the State of Wisconsin, if we
renew the permit. Incidental take occurs as a result of impacts of
otherwise lawful land use and land management actions. These activities
have been altered under the HCP to minimize and mitigate the effects of
incidental take of Karner blue butterflies and the habitats upon which
they depend. We have issued an environmental assessment to evaluate the
impacts of the alternatives for renewal of the incidental take permit,
including the no action alternative.
In the 1990s, the State of Wisconsin initiated a unique partnership
with a variety of land managers in Wisconsin to develop a statewide HCP
for the Karner blue butterfly. For a period of approximately 5 years,
partners gathered regularly and worked with the Service on an
innovative plan to incorporate considerations for the Karner blue
butterfly into land-use activities. Partners include the forest
industry, utility companies, road management authorities, The Nature
[[Page 10310]]
Conservancy, and private landowners. The effort culminated in September
1999 with the signing of an Implementing Agreement and issuance of an
ITP. The DNR serves as the permit holder and administers the
implementation of the Statewide plan. At the outset, 26 partners were
part of the HCP. In the first 10 years of implementation, the list of
partners has grown to 39 major land-management entities.
In addition to the partners in this effort, the DNR proposed and
implemented a unique approach to include small landowners in the
conservation effort on a voluntary basis. This voluntary strategy has
proved to be successful in garnering additional conservation and
protection of butterfly habitat, without the ``fear'' sometimes
associated with government regulation.
Management protocols have been refined, populations of butterflies
have increased and others discovered, and a number of improvements
resulted from what has been learned through adaptive management. This
HCP has been lauded as an innovative and successful approach to
endangered species conservation.
The Karner blue butterfly depends on ecological disturbance, which
maintains the early successional habitat in which its specific host
plant survives. Proper management, with specific strategies to conserve
the butterfly, results in increases of habitat and in the population.
In the case of this species, cessation of habitat management and an
absence of natural wildfire regimes would lead to habitat that would
not support survival of the species into the future. Since the
butterfly thrives in concert with habitat manipulation and management,
it has been an ideal species for a conservation plan.
The HCP has been updated to consolidate the conservation measures
found in the original HCP and to allow for easy access by partners
implementing the plan. In addition, the DNR has developed an
implementation handbook, called the HCP User's Guide, which is
available online. It includes management protocols for a wide range of
covered activities, such as habitat restoration, timber harvest,
mowing, and burning. To understand the breadth of management activities
that are incorporated into the HCP, please visit the DNR's Web site at
https://www.dnr.state.wi.us/forestry/karner/hcp-userguide.htm.
The updated draft HCP includes an improved conservation program, a
focused effort on recovery properties to enhance long-term survival and
recovery of the butterfly, biological modeling to predict butterfly
occurrence and flights, and improvements concerning compliance
monitoring and reporting.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose for which we have prepared an Environmental Assessment
is to respond to the applicant's request for an ITP renewal for the
Karner blue butterfly. This involves the continuation of activities
that have the potential to result in incidental take of the butterfly
through implementation of the Wisconsin Statewide HCP. The applicant's
updated HCP balances the long-term survival and recovery of the species
with resource management in Wisconsin, allowing for otherwise lawful
activities to proceed, while accommodating the needs of the species. It
ensures the long-term survival of the species through protection and
proactive habitat management and it ensures compliance with the Act,
NEPA, and other applicable laws and regulations pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act and its implementing regulations and policies.
Proposed Action
The requested duration of the ITP is 10 years. The plan is a
Statewide conservation plan and the ITP would cover the take of the
Karner blue butterfly in Wisconsin. A map of the species' high
potential range is included on the Service's Web site, referenced below
under Reviewing Documents and Submitting Comments. Activities that
would continue to be covered under the ITP include a variety of land
management activities. These include forestry/timber harvest, right-of-
way management (mowing/brushing), pesticide application, recreation
management, prescribed burning, snow removal, and others. The proposed
action is the renewal of ITP Number TE010064 to authorize take of the
Karner blue butterfly within the State of Wisconsin, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Incidental take anticipated under this permit
application is specific to the Karner blue butterfly in the form of
habitat impacts, direct take of butterflies resulting from management
and direct take for completing research and monitoring under the HCP.
The HCP provides measures to modify activities to minimize and mitigate
the effects of the proposed incidental take. The biological goal of the
HCP is to provide long-term suitable habitat for the species. The
restoration and maintenance of suitable habitat and ecosystem functions
necessary to ensure long-term viability of butterfly populations
ensures survival and recovery of the species.
Alternatives
Two alternatives were fully evaluated in the environmental
assessment prepared for this action, renewal of the ITP and no action/
denial of the permit. One additional alternative, issuance of a permit
with additional measures specified by the Service, was discussed but
eliminated from further consideration. Renewal of the ITP for another
10-year period would allow for continued implementation of the HCP,
which has become the normal way of doing business in Wisconsin.
Partners and other citizens in Wisconsin have embraced conservation of
the species and have altered their activities accordingly. The DNR has
been an effective administrator of this permit since 1999 and has
coordinated closely with the Service to apply adaptive management
principles where needed. Protocols have been developed for additional
types of activities and the DNR has worked closely with the
implementation and oversight committee, established in the HCP, to
effectively monitor compliance with the program, both in terms of
statutory compliance and effectiveness in meeting biological goals. For
all intents and purposes, forecasting the next 10 years of
implementation amounts to at least the status quo and, more likely,
increased habitat for the butterfly. Habitat management would continue
to be completed in a manner that accommodates the needs of the Karner
blue butterfly, and the species would continue to thrive and recover in
Wisconsin.
The no action alternative would result in a denial of the request
to renew the ITP. In this case, the no action alternative would
actually result in a larger change in the landscape and in the
implementation of conservation activities for the Karner blue
butterfly. If the Statewide permit ceases to exist, multiple landowners
(at least 39, who are now partners in the HCP) would be in the position
of needing to develop an HCP and apply for a permit from the Service.
Each application would undergo processing and review under ESA and
NEPA. Where butterflies currently exist, habitat management that
incidentally takes butterflies could not proceed. Vegetation succession
would follow and the plant community would no longer support the Karner
blue butterfly. In addition, the small private landowners who are
currently covered by the Statewide HCP would be subject to ESA
compliance wherever butterflies exist. There would be a disincentive to
[[Page 10311]]
managing the habitat to promote persistence of the butterfly, and the
assurances they have received under the current conservation program
would cease. Landowners who wish to proactively conserve their land to
promote recovery of the butterfly in Wisconsin would need their own
permits under Section 10, with an HCP or Safe Harbor Agreement for
their lands.
Reviewing Documents and Submitting Comments
Please refer to TE010064 when requesting documents or submitting
comments. The permit application and supporting documents (updated
draft HCP and draft EA) may be obtained on the Internet at the
following address: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/permits/hcp/r3hcps.html. In addition, the original HCP, dated March 2000, may be
viewed on the Wisconsin DNR Web site at https://dnr.wi.gov/forestry/karner/. Persons without access to the Internet may obtain copies of
the documents (application, updated draft HCP, and draft EA) by
contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services
Field Office, 2661 Scott Tower Drive, New Franken, WI 54229-9565 (920/
866-1717, voice; 920/866-1710, fax). The documents will also be
available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business
hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the Ecological Services Field Office in
New Franken and at the Service's Regional Office, Ecological Services,
Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, 1 Federal Drive, 6th Floor, Ft.
Snelling, MN 55111 (612/713-5164, voice; 612/713-5292, fax). Written
comments will be accepted as described above.
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in
your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment, including
your personal identifying information, may be made available at any
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Authority : We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (50
CFR 17.22), and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
T.J. Miller,
Acting, Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3,
Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 2010-4708 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P