Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on Compliance of Missouri State Plan Provisions Concerning Payments for Home Health Services With Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act, 10289-10290 [2010-4671]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices
comprising high affinity
oligonucleotides, assays for selecting
test compounds, and related kits.
Inventors: Alan R. Rein et al. (NCI).
Patent Status: U.S. Patent No.
6,316,190 issued 13 Nov 2001 (HHS
Reference No. E–107–1996/0–US–06).
Licensing Status: Available for
licensing.
Licensing Contact: Sally Hu, PhD;
301–435–5606; hus@mail.nih.gov.
Dated: March 1, 2010.
Richard U. Rodriguez,
Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–4757 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on
Compliance of Missouri State Plan
Provisions Concerning Payments for
Home Health Services With Title XIX
(Medicaid) of the Social Security Act
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Opportunity for a
Hearing; Compliance of Missouri
Medicaid State Plan Home Health
Benefit.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
opportunity for an administrative
hearing to be held no later than 60 days
following publication in the Federal
Register at the CMS Kansas City
Regional Office, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106, to
consider whether Missouri State plan
provisions concerning payments for
home health services comply with the
requirements of the Social Security Act
as discussed in the February 26, 2010
letter sent to the State and published
herein.
Closing Date: Requests to participate
in the hearing as a party must be
received by the presiding officer by
April 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin R. Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite
L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786–3169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces the opportunity for an
administrative hearing concerning the
finding of the Administrator of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) that the approved State
plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Mar 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
Social Security Act (the Act) for the
State of Missouri is not in compliance
with the provisions of sections 1902(a)
of the Act and the proposed
withholding of Federal financial
participation for a portion of Missouri’s
expenditures for home health services.
In particular, CMS has found that the
State plan does not provide for home
health services for Medicaid
beneficiaries who are not ‘‘confined to
the home.’’ As a result of this
‘‘homebound’’ requirement, certain
Medicaid beneficiaries are not receiving
the full benefit package required under
the Act and applicable regulations.
Consequently, Federal payments for a
portion of the Federal funding for home
health services will be withheld, subject
to the opportunity for a hearing
described below. This notice is being
provided pursuant to the requirements
of section 1904 of the Act, as
implemented at 42 CFR 430.35 and 42
CFR part 430, subpart D.
Section 1902(a)(10)(D) requires that
State plans provide for the coverage of
home health services for any individual
who, under the State plan, is entitled to
nursing facility services. Nursing facility
services are a required service for
categorically needy populations under
section 1902(a)(10)(A), as defined in
section 1905(a)(4)(A). Under CMS
regulations, a service included as a
covered benefit under a State plan must
be ‘‘sufficient in amount, duration and
scope to reasonably achieve its purpose’’
(42 CFR 440.230(b)) and, for required
services, cannot be denied or reduced to
an eligible beneficiary ‘‘solely because of
the diagnosis, type of illness, or
condition’’ (42 CFR 440.230(c)). It is not
consistent with these requirements to
deny home health services to eligible
individuals who need such services on
the basis that they are not ‘‘homebound.’’
The CMS provided interpretive
guidance indicating that these statutory
requirements preclude denial of home
health services to eligible individuals
because they are not ‘‘homebound.’’ On
July 25, 2000, CMS, then the Health
Care Financing Administration, issued
Olmstead Update #3 which clarified
that the Medicare rule for home health
services requiring an individual to be
‘‘homebound’’ did not apply to the
receipt of Medicaid home health
services. Specifically, Olmstead Update
#3 states that the ‘‘homebound’’
requirement violates Federal regulatory
requirements at 42 CFR section
440.230(c) and section 440.240(b).
The ‘‘homebound’’ requirement in
Missouri was raised during the review
of Missouri State plan amendment
(SPA) 05–09. At that time, Missouri
chose to withdraw the page containing
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10289
the ‘‘homebound’’ language but did not
reverse the policy. Since that time, there
have been numerous discussions
between CMS and Missouri regarding
this issue. On October 30, 2009, CMS
provided Missouri with notice of the
preliminary determination that it
appeared to be out of compliance with
Federal Medicaid requirements. In
addition, CMS requested that Missouri
submit a SPA to remove the
‘‘homebound’’ requirement.
In its response dated December 31,
2009, Missouri indicated that it was
operating under its approved State plan
and that the requirements of Missouri’s
home health program are the same as
those of the Federal Medicare program.
The State did not submit a SPA. CMS
believes that Missouri has had
numerous opportunities to come into
compliance with Federal requirements.
The notice to Missouri, dated
February 26, 2010, containing the
details concerning the compliance issue,
the proposed withhold, and the
opportunity for an administrative
hearing reads as follows:
CERTIFIED MAIL—RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
Mr. Ronald J. Levy, Director,
Department of Social Services,
Broadway State Office Building,
Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Dear Mr. Levy: This letter provides
notice that the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) has found that
Missouri is not providing all Medicaid
beneficiaries with home health benefits
that are required under title XIX of the
Social Security Act (the Act) and that
until this deficiency is corrected (by
making home health services available
to all beneficiaries entitled to such
services), a portion of the Federal
funding for home health services will be
withheld, subject to the opportunity for
a hearing. The details of the finding,
proposed withholding, and opportunity
for a hearing are described in detail
below.
Specifically, CMS has found that the
approved Missouri State plan under title
XIX (Medicaid) of the Act is not in
compliance with the provisions of
section 1902(a) of the Act with respect
to the home health benefit. In particular,
CMS has found that the State plan does
not provide for home health services for
Medicaid beneficiaries who are not
‘‘confined to the home.’’ As a result of
this ‘‘homebound’’ requirement, certain
Medicaid beneficiaries are not receiving
the full benefit package required under
section 1902(a)(10) of the Act, which in
subparagraph (D) provides for the
inclusion of home health services in the
standard Medicaid benefit package.
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
10290
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 43 / Friday, March 5, 2010 / Notices
Moreover, the ‘‘homebound’’
requirement does not comply with
section 1902(a)(10)(B) of the Act, which
requires that State plans provide a
comparable amount, duration, and
scope of benefits to all individuals
eligible for the standard Medicaid
benefit package, and within each
optional group of individuals eligible
for benefits based on medical need.
The basic framework of Medicaid
coverage of home health services is set
forth in the Federal statute and
regulations. Section 1902(a)(10)(D) of
the Act requires that State plans provide
for the coverage of the home health
services benefit, set forth in section
1905(a)(7) of the Act, for any individual
who, under the State plan, is entitled to
nursing facility services. Pursuant to
section 1902(a)(10) of the Act, the
nursing facility service benefit described
at section 1905(a)(4)(A) of the Act is a
required benefit that must be included
in the standard Medicaid benefit
package for categorically needy
populations described in section
1902(a)(10)(A) of the Act. Section
1902(a)(10)(B) of the Act sets forth the
benefit comparability principle, that the
amount, duration, and scope of medical
assistance benefits for all categorically
needy individuals described in section
1902(a)(10)(A) of the Act must be equal.
Under CMS regulations implementing
the benefit package requirements at
sections 1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the
Act that are described above, home
health services are included as a
mandatory benefit for the categorically
needy under 42 CFR 440.210(a)(1).
Moreover, a service included as a
covered benefit under a State plan must
be ‘‘sufficient in amount, duration, and
scope to reasonably achieve its purpose’’
(42 CFR 440.230(b)) and, for required
services, cannot be denied or reduced to
an eligible beneficiary ‘‘solely because of
the diagnosis, type of illness, or
condition’’ (42 CFR 440.230(c)). It is not
consistent with these requirements to
deny home health services to eligible
individuals who need such services
based on a ‘‘homebound’’ requirement.
The State has had clear notice that a
‘‘homebound’’ requirement is
inconsistent with the Medicaid statute.
In response to the June 22, 1999,
Supreme Court decision in the case of
Olmstead v. L.C. & E.W., which
reinforced the Americans with
Disabilities Act by affirming the right of
individuals with disabilities to live in
their communities, CMS, then the
Health Care Financing Administration
(HCFA), issued a series of State
Medicaid Director letters to clarify
Medicaid policy on issues impacted by
the Olmstead decision. On July 25,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Mar 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
2000, HCFA issued Olmstead Update #3
which clarified that the Medicare rule
for home health services requiring an
individual to be ‘‘homebound’’ did not
apply to the receipt of Medicaid home
health services. Olmstead Update #3
specifically stated that the ‘‘homebound’’
requirement violates Federal regulatory
requirements at 42 CFR section
440.230(c) and section 440.240(b).
The CMS notified the State in a
request for additional information on
proposed State plan amendment (SPA)
05–09 that the State needed to change
its ‘‘homebound’’ requirement to comply
with Federal requirements. At that time,
Missouri withdrew the SPA page that
raised this issue but did not reverse its
policy in order to comply with Federal
requirements. Subsequently, CMS has
raised the issue with the State in
numerous conversations and again in a
letter dated October 30, 2009. Your
letter of December 31, 2009, indicated
that the State did not intend to make the
required changes.
For all of these reasons, and in light
of the need to protect beneficiaries by
ensuring that they receive all the
services to which they are required, I am
taking this compliance action to
withhold a portion of the Federal
financial participation in State
expenditures for home health services,
subject to the opportunity for a hearing
described below, until such time as I am
satisfied that the State is complying
with the Federal requirements discussed
above. The withholding will initially be
10 percent of the Federal share of the
State’s quarterly claim for home health
services as reported on Line 12 of your
Form CMS–64. The withholding
percentage will then increase 5
percentage points each quarter (i.e.,
15%, 20%, etc.) that the State remains
out of compliance, up to a maximum
withholding percentage of 100 percent.
The withholding will end when a SPA
bringing the State into compliance is
approved by CMS.
The State has 30 days from the date
of this letter either to submit a plan for
how the State will come into
compliance or to request a hearing. As
specified in the accompanying Federal
Register notice we are providing an
opportunity for an administrative
hearing to ensure that you have an
opportunity for a hearing prior to this
determination becoming final. However,
it is up to the State as to whether you
choose to go forward with this hearing.
If you choose to proceed with a hearing,
you must submit a request within 30
days of the date of this letter. If a request
for a hearing is timely submitted, the
hearing will be convened by the Hearing
Officer designated below on [no later
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
than 60 days after the date of the
Federal Register notice], or a later date
by agreement of the parties and the
Hearing Officer, at the CMS Regional
Office in Kansas City, Missouri in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in Federal regulations at 42 CFR
Part 430, Subpart D. The overall issue in
any such appeal will be whether the
Missouri homebound requirement is
consistent with Federal requirements.
Any request for such a hearing should
be sent to the designated hearing officer.
The Hearing Officer also should be
notified if you request a hearing but
cannot meet the timeframe expressed in
this notice. Your Hearing Officer is:
Benjamin R. Cohen, Hearing Officer,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive,
Suite L, Baltimore, MD 21244.
If you choose not to request a hearing,
and plan to come into compliance,
please submit within 30 days of the date
of this letter an explanation of how you
plan to come into compliance with
Federal requirements and the timeframe
for doing so. We are available to provide
further information or assistance on the
steps necessary to bring the State into
compliance.
Should you not come into compliance
and not request a hearing within 30
days, a notice of withholding will be
sent to you and the withholding of
Federal funds will begin as described
above.
If you have any questions or wish to
discuss this determination further,
please contact: Mr. James G. Scott,
Associate Regional Administrator,
Division of Medicaid and Children’s
Health Operations, CMS Kansas City
Regional Office, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, MO 64106.
Sincerely,
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 13.714, Medicaid Assistance
Program.)
Dated: February 26, 2010.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–4671 Filed 3–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10289-10290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on Compliance of Missouri
State Plan Provisions Concerning Payments for Home Health Services With
Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing; Compliance of Missouri
Medicaid State Plan Home Health Benefit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the opportunity for an administrative
hearing to be held no later than 60 days following publication in the
Federal Register at the CMS Kansas City Regional Office, 601 E. 12th
Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, to consider whether Missouri State
plan provisions concerning payments for home health services comply
with the requirements of the Social Security Act as discussed in the
February 26, 2010 letter sent to the State and published herein.
Closing Date: Requests to participate in the hearing as a party
must be received by the presiding officer by April 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin R. Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786-3169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the opportunity for an
administrative hearing concerning the finding of the Administrator of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that the approved
State plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act (the
Act) for the State of Missouri is not in compliance with the provisions
of sections 1902(a) of the Act and the proposed withholding of Federal
financial participation for a portion of Missouri's expenditures for
home health services. In particular, CMS has found that the State plan
does not provide for home health services for Medicaid beneficiaries
who are not ``confined to the home.'' As a result of this ``homebound''
requirement, certain Medicaid beneficiaries are not receiving the full
benefit package required under the Act and applicable regulations.
Consequently, Federal payments for a portion of the Federal funding for
home health services will be withheld, subject to the opportunity for a
hearing described below. This notice is being provided pursuant to the
requirements of section 1904 of the Act, as implemented at 42 CFR
430.35 and 42 CFR part 430, subpart D.
Section 1902(a)(10)(D) requires that State plans provide for the
coverage of home health services for any individual who, under the
State plan, is entitled to nursing facility services. Nursing facility
services are a required service for categorically needy populations
under section 1902(a)(10)(A), as defined in section 1905(a)(4)(A).
Under CMS regulations, a service included as a covered benefit under a
State plan must be ``sufficient in amount, duration and scope to
reasonably achieve its purpose'' (42 CFR 440.230(b)) and, for required
services, cannot be denied or reduced to an eligible beneficiary
``solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition'' (42
CFR 440.230(c)). It is not consistent with these requirements to deny
home health services to eligible individuals who need such services on
the basis that they are not ``homebound.''
The CMS provided interpretive guidance indicating that these
statutory requirements preclude denial of home health services to
eligible individuals because they are not ``homebound.'' On July 25,
2000, CMS, then the Health Care Financing Administration, issued
Olmstead Update 3 which clarified that the Medicare rule for
home health services requiring an individual to be ``homebound'' did
not apply to the receipt of Medicaid home health services.
Specifically, Olmstead Update 3 states that the ``homebound''
requirement violates Federal regulatory requirements at 42 CFR section
440.230(c) and section 440.240(b).
The ``homebound'' requirement in Missouri was raised during the
review of Missouri State plan amendment (SPA) 05-09. At that time,
Missouri chose to withdraw the page containing the ``homebound''
language but did not reverse the policy. Since that time, there have
been numerous discussions between CMS and Missouri regarding this
issue. On October 30, 2009, CMS provided Missouri with notice of the
preliminary determination that it appeared to be out of compliance with
Federal Medicaid requirements. In addition, CMS requested that Missouri
submit a SPA to remove the ``homebound'' requirement.
In its response dated December 31, 2009, Missouri indicated that it
was operating under its approved State plan and that the requirements
of Missouri's home health program are the same as those of the Federal
Medicare program. The State did not submit a SPA. CMS believes that
Missouri has had numerous opportunities to come into compliance with
Federal requirements.
The notice to Missouri, dated February 26, 2010, containing the
details concerning the compliance issue, the proposed withhold, and the
opportunity for an administrative hearing reads as follows:
CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ronald J. Levy, Director, Department of Social Services, Broadway
State Office Building, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Dear Mr. Levy: This letter provides notice that the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has found that Missouri is not
providing all Medicaid beneficiaries with home health benefits that are
required under title XIX of the Social Security Act (the Act) and that
until this deficiency is corrected (by making home health services
available to all beneficiaries entitled to such services), a portion of
the Federal funding for home health services will be withheld, subject
to the opportunity for a hearing. The details of the finding, proposed
withholding, and opportunity for a hearing are described in detail
below.
Specifically, CMS has found that the approved Missouri State plan
under title XIX (Medicaid) of the Act is not in compliance with the
provisions of section 1902(a) of the Act with respect to the home
health benefit. In particular, CMS has found that the State plan does
not provide for home health services for Medicaid beneficiaries who are
not ``confined to the home.'' As a result of this ``homebound''
requirement, certain Medicaid beneficiaries are not receiving the full
benefit package required under section 1902(a)(10) of the Act, which in
subparagraph (D) provides for the inclusion of home health services in
the standard Medicaid benefit package.
[[Page 10290]]
Moreover, the ``homebound'' requirement does not comply with section
1902(a)(10)(B) of the Act, which requires that State plans provide a
comparable amount, duration, and scope of benefits to all individuals
eligible for the standard Medicaid benefit package, and within each
optional group of individuals eligible for benefits based on medical
need.
The basic framework of Medicaid coverage of home health services is
set forth in the Federal statute and regulations. Section
1902(a)(10)(D) of the Act requires that State plans provide for the
coverage of the home health services benefit, set forth in section
1905(a)(7) of the Act, for any individual who, under the State plan, is
entitled to nursing facility services. Pursuant to section 1902(a)(10)
of the Act, the nursing facility service benefit described at section
1905(a)(4)(A) of the Act is a required benefit that must be included in
the standard Medicaid benefit package for categorically needy
populations described in section 1902(a)(10)(A) of the Act. Section
1902(a)(10)(B) of the Act sets forth the benefit comparability
principle, that the amount, duration, and scope of medical assistance
benefits for all categorically needy individuals described in section
1902(a)(10)(A) of the Act must be equal.
Under CMS regulations implementing the benefit package requirements
at sections 1902(a)(10) and 1905(a) of the Act that are described
above, home health services are included as a mandatory benefit for the
categorically needy under 42 CFR 440.210(a)(1). Moreover, a service
included as a covered benefit under a State plan must be ``sufficient
in amount, duration, and scope to reasonably achieve its purpose'' (42
CFR 440.230(b)) and, for required services, cannot be denied or reduced
to an eligible beneficiary ``solely because of the diagnosis, type of
illness, or condition'' (42 CFR 440.230(c)). It is not consistent with
these requirements to deny home health services to eligible individuals
who need such services based on a ``homebound'' requirement.
The State has had clear notice that a ``homebound'' requirement is
inconsistent with the Medicaid statute. In response to the June 22,
1999, Supreme Court decision in the case of Olmstead v. L.C. & E.W.,
which reinforced the Americans with Disabilities Act by affirming the
right of individuals with disabilities to live in their communities,
CMS, then the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), issued a
series of State Medicaid Director letters to clarify Medicaid policy on
issues impacted by the Olmstead decision. On July 25, 2000, HCFA issued
Olmstead Update 3 which clarified that the Medicare rule for
home health services requiring an individual to be ``homebound'' did
not apply to the receipt of Medicaid home health services. Olmstead
Update 3 specifically stated that the ``homebound''
requirement violates Federal regulatory requirements at 42 CFR section
440.230(c) and section 440.240(b).
The CMS notified the State in a request for additional information
on proposed State plan amendment (SPA) 05-09 that the State needed to
change its ``homebound'' requirement to comply with Federal
requirements. At that time, Missouri withdrew the SPA page that raised
this issue but did not reverse its policy in order to comply with
Federal requirements. Subsequently, CMS has raised the issue with the
State in numerous conversations and again in a letter dated October 30,
2009. Your letter of December 31, 2009, indicated that the State did
not intend to make the required changes.
For all of these reasons, and in light of the need to protect
beneficiaries by ensuring that they receive all the services to which
they are required, I am taking this compliance action to withhold a
portion of the Federal financial participation in State expenditures
for home health services, subject to the opportunity for a hearing
described below, until such time as I am satisfied that the State is
complying with the Federal requirements discussed above. The
withholding will initially be 10 percent of the Federal share of the
State's quarterly claim for home health services as reported on Line 12
of your Form CMS-64. The withholding percentage will then increase 5
percentage points each quarter (i.e., 15%, 20%, etc.) that the State
remains out of compliance, up to a maximum withholding percentage of
100 percent. The withholding will end when a SPA bringing the State
into compliance is approved by CMS.
The State has 30 days from the date of this letter either to submit
a plan for how the State will come into compliance or to request a
hearing. As specified in the accompanying Federal Register notice we
are providing an opportunity for an administrative hearing to ensure
that you have an opportunity for a hearing prior to this determination
becoming final. However, it is up to the State as to whether you choose
to go forward with this hearing. If you choose to proceed with a
hearing, you must submit a request within 30 days of the date of this
letter. If a request for a hearing is timely submitted, the hearing
will be convened by the Hearing Officer designated below on [no later
than 60 days after the date of the Federal Register notice], or a later
date by agreement of the parties and the Hearing Officer, at the CMS
Regional Office in Kansas City, Missouri in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Federal regulations at 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart
D. The overall issue in any such appeal will be whether the Missouri
homebound requirement is consistent with Federal requirements. Any
request for such a hearing should be sent to the designated hearing
officer. The Hearing Officer also should be notified if you request a
hearing but cannot meet the timeframe expressed in this notice. Your
Hearing Officer is: Benjamin R. Cohen, Hearing Officer, Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L,
Baltimore, MD 21244.
If you choose not to request a hearing, and plan to come into
compliance, please submit within 30 days of the date of this letter an
explanation of how you plan to come into compliance with Federal
requirements and the timeframe for doing so. We are available to
provide further information or assistance on the steps necessary to
bring the State into compliance.
Should you not come into compliance and not request a hearing
within 30 days, a notice of withholding will be sent to you and the
withholding of Federal funds will begin as described above.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this determination
further, please contact: Mr. James G. Scott, Associate Regional
Administrator, Division of Medicaid and Children's Health Operations,
CMS Kansas City Regional Office, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, MO
64106.
Sincerely,
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 13.714, Medicaid
Assistance Program.)
Dated: February 26, 2010.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-4671 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P