Cooperative Conservation Partners Initiative; Wetlands Reserve Enhancement Program, 9380-9388 [2010-4275]
Download as PDF
9380
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 40
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Cooperative Conservation Partners
Initiative; Wetlands Reserve
Enhancement Program
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation
and Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of request for proposals
through the Mississippi River Basin
Healthy Watersheds Initiative.
SUMMARY: The Chief of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
who is Vice President of the Commodity
Credit Corporation (CCC), announces
the availability of financial assistance
funds in fiscal year (FY) 2010 for up to
$50 million in the Cooperative
Conservation Partnership Initiative
(CCPI) and $25 million in the Wetlands
Reserve Enhancement Program (WREP)
through the Mississippi River Basin
Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) to
eligible participants in 12-digit
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
subwatershed(s) within the 41
designated focus areas (8-digit HUCs) in
the following States: Arkansas, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio,
Tennessee, and Wisconsin. The purpose
of this notice is to solicit proposals from
potential partners to enter into
partnership agreements with NRCS, and
to inform agricultural producers and
landowners of the future availability of
program funds through approved
partnership projects.
DATES: Effective Date: The Notice of
Request is effective March 2, 2010.
Eligible partners may submit
proposals by mail or via courier.
• By mail, proposals must be
postmarked by May 3, 2010.
• By courier, proposals must be
delivered by May 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written proposals should be
submitted to the addresses identified
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
below, with copies to the appropriate
NRCS State Conservationist, whose
names and addresses are identified as
an attachment to this notice. If a project
is multi-State in scope, all State
Conservationists in the proposed project
area must be sent the proposal for
review.
• By mail: Gregory K. Johnson,
Director, Financial Assistance Programs
Division, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
5241 South Building, Washington, DC
20250. (Note: Registered or Certified
Mail to a Post Office may not be used.)
• By courier: Gregory K. Johnson,
Director, Financial Assistance Programs
Division, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
5241 South Building, Washington, DC
20250, Telephone: (202) 720–1845. All
proposals will be accepted between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays. Please
ask the guard at the entrance to the
South Building to call (202) 720–1845.
State Conservationists will review and
comment on eligible proposals and will
share them with their State Technical
Committee for input and feedback.
Proposals submitted via fax, email, or
after the deadline date or times listed in
this notice will not be considered.
Proposals submitted via the grants.gov
Web site will not be considered.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• CCPI projects: Gregory K. Johnson,
Director, Financial Assistance Programs
Division, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
5241 South Building, Washington, DC
20250; Telephone: (202) 720–1845; Fax:
(202) 720–4264; or e-mail: MRBI–
CCPI@wdc.usda.gov. Additional
information regarding CCPI is available
at the following NRCS Web page: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/CCPI/
• WREP projects: Andree DuVarney,
Acting Director, Easement Programs
Division, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
6819 South Building, Washington, DC
20250; Telephone: (202) 720–1854; Fax:
(202) 720–9689; or e-mail: MRBI–
WREP@wdc.usda.gov. Additional
information regarding WREP is available
at the following NRCS Web page: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/WRP
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Monitoring and Evaluation: Mike
Hubbs, Director, Ecological Sciences
Division, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
6158 South Building, Washington, DC
20250; Telephone: (202) 720–5992; Fax:
(202) 720–2646; or email:
Mike.Hubbs@wdc.usda.gov
• MRBI Information: Information
concerning MRBI can be found at the
following Web page: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/
mrbi.html
• Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for
communication (Braille, large print,
audio tape, etc.) should contact the
USDA Target Center at: (202) 720–2600
(voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 2904 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Act) requires that the
implementation of this provision be
carried out without regard to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, Chapter 35 of
title 44, U.S.C. Therefore, the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) is
not reporting recordkeeping or
estimated paperwork burden associated
with this amendment.
Background
The Mississippi River Basin is a
critical ecosystem within the United
States. Its entire land mass, totaling 41
percent of the contiguous United States
and 15 percent of North America, drains
into the Mississippi River and the Gulf
of Mexico. Stretching 2,350 miles from
its headwaters at Lake Itasca,
Minnesota, to the mouth of the Gulf of
Mexico, the Mississippi River carries an
average of 436,000 tons of sediment
each day. Nutrients, like nitrogen and
phosphorus, contribute to both local
water quality problems and the hypoxic
zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
To help solve these water quality
problems, NRCS has developed the
MRBI. Through this new initiative,
NRCS and its partners will help
landowners and operators in selected
watersheds in the Mississippi River
Basin voluntarily implement
conservation systems that avoid,
control, and trap nutrient runoff;
protect, restore, and enhance wetlands;
maintain agricultural productivity;
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
improve wildlife habitat; and achieve
other MRBI objectives.
Within the designated focus areas in
the Mississippi River Basin, NRCS
announces the availability of financial
assistance funds in FY 2010 for up $50
million in the CCPI and $25 million in
the WREP to eligible participants
through approved partnership projects
in the following States: Arkansas,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and
Wisconsin.
Forty-one focus areas (watersheds)
have been selected by NRCS State
Conservationists, with input from the
State Technical Committees and State
water quality agencies, to help improve
water quality by reducing nitrogen and
phosphorous levels in the Mississippi
River Basin. The selected watersheds
are listed below. Using CCPI and WREP,
NRCS will leverage partner
contributions and accelerate
conservation assistance to improve
water quality; protect, restore, and
enhance wetlands; enhance wildlife
habitat; and achieve other MRBI
objectives. Entities interested in
partnering with NRCS in the MRBI must
submit separate proposals for CCPI and
WREP to the addresses identified in this
notice. NRCS will not accept joint CCPI
and WREP proposals in FY 2010.
Accordingly, an entity is encouraged to
submit a proposal for each program.
Proposals that integrate CCPI and WREP
within a project area will receive higher
9381
priority. Entities should note in their
applications that proposals have been
submitted for both CCPI and WREP,
when applicable.
Focus Areas
Eligible partners should submit
complete proposals addressing the
conservation objectives to be achieved
in one or more 12-digit HUC
subwatersheds within the designated 8digit focus area or areas. The designated
focus areas listed by 8-digit HUC are
below. A complete list of the smallerscale, 12-digit HUC subwatersheds
within the designated 8-digit focus areas
can be found at: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/
unit_code_lists.html.
DESIGNATED FOCUS AREAS FOR THE MRBI FY 2010 (8-DIGIT HUCS)
Hydrologic unit
code
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
State(s)
Watershed
Arkansas/Missouri .......................................................................
Arkansas .....................................................................................
Arkansas .....................................................................................
Arkansas/Missouri .......................................................................
Illinois ..........................................................................................
Illinois ..........................................................................................
Illinois ..........................................................................................
Illinois/Indiana .............................................................................
Indiana ........................................................................................
Indiana ........................................................................................
Indiana ........................................................................................
Indiana/Ohio ................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................
Iowa/Minnesota ...........................................................................
Kentucky/Tennessee ...................................................................
Kentucky .....................................................................................
Kentucky .....................................................................................
Louisiana .....................................................................................
Louisiana/Arkansas .....................................................................
Louisiana/Arkansas .....................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................
Mississippi ...................................................................................
Mississippi/Louisiana/Arkansas ..................................................
Mississippi ...................................................................................
Missouri/Iowa ..............................................................................
Missouri .......................................................................................
Missouri .......................................................................................
Missouri/Arkansas .......................................................................
Ohio/Indiana ................................................................................
Ohio .............................................................................................
Tennessee ..................................................................................
Tennessee/Kentucky ...................................................................
Tennessee ..................................................................................
Tennessee/Kentucky ...................................................................
Wisconsin/Illinois .........................................................................
Wisconsin/Illinois .........................................................................
Wisconsin/Illinois .........................................................................
Cache .........................................................................................
Lake Conway-Point Remove .....................................................
L’Anguille ....................................................................................
Lower St. Francis .......................................................................
Lower Illinois-Senachwine Lake ................................................
Upper Illinois ..............................................................................
Vermillion (Upper Mississippi River sub-basin) .........................
Vermillion (Upper Ohio River sub-basin) ...................................
Eel ..............................................................................................
Upper East Fork White ..............................................................
Wildcat .......................................................................................
Upper Wabash ...........................................................................
Boone .........................................................................................
Maquoketa .................................................................................
North Raccoon ...........................................................................
Upper Cedar ..............................................................................
Bayou De Chien-Mayfield ..........................................................
Licking ........................................................................................
Lower Green ..............................................................................
Mermentau .................................................................................
Bayou Macon .............................................................................
Boeuf River ................................................................................
Middle Minnesota .......................................................................
Root ............................................................................................
Sauk ...........................................................................................
Big Sunflower .............................................................................
Deer-Steele ................................................................................
Upper Yazoo ..............................................................................
Lower Grand ..............................................................................
North Fork Salt ...........................................................................
South Fork Salt ..........................................................................
Little River Ditches .....................................................................
Upper Great Miami ....................................................................
Upper Scioto ..............................................................................
Forked Deer ...............................................................................
Obion ..........................................................................................
South Fork Obion .......................................................................
Red River ...................................................................................
Sugar ..........................................................................................
Upper Rock ................................................................................
Pecatonica .................................................................................
Submitting Proposals
Potential partners must submit a
complete proposal to Gregory K.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Johnson, Director, Financial Assistance
Programs Division, addressing all
questions and items listed in the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
08020302
11110203
08020205
08020203
07130001
07130005
07130002
05120109
05120104
05120206
05120107
05120101
07100005
07060006
07100006
07080201
08010201
05100101
05110005
08080202
08050002
08050001
07020007
07040008
07010202
08030207
08030209
08030206
10280103
07110005
07110006
08020204
05080001
05060001
08010206
08010202
08010203
05130206
07090004
07090001
07090003
appropriate subpart of this notice.
Potential partners should recognize that
the proposal is the only document
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
9382
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
NRCS will use in the evaluation
process. The proposal must include
sufficient detail to allow NRCS to
understand the partner’s priority
resource concerns, objectives, and
expected outcomes. Incomplete
proposals and those that do not meet the
requirements set forth in this notice will
not be considered, and notification of
elimination will be mailed to the
applicant. Proposal evaluation will be
based upon a competitive process and
the criteria established under the
appropriate CCPI or WREP proposal
requirements. Proposals for CCPI and
WREP must be submitted separately.
To further explain how each of these
watershed-based initiatives work and
specify how to submit proposals for
CCPI and WREP, NRCS identifies the
policies and processes below.
Part A: MRBI–CCPI
Section 2707 of the 2008 Act
established the CCPI by amending
section 1243 of the Food Security Act of
1985 (16 U.S.C. 3843). The Request for
Proposals contains a number of new
terms and words which would normally
be included in a definitions section.
However, in order to reduce content and
improve readability of this notice,
definitions may be obtained by
contacting the persons referenced in the
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section and online at: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/
mrbi.html or https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/
programs/ccpi.
CCPI is a voluntary initiative that uses
the funds, policies, and processes of
conservation programs under Subtitle D
of Title XII of the Food Security Act,
specifically the Environmental Quality
Incentives Program (EQIP) (7 CFR part
1466), Wildlife Habitat Incentives
Program (WHIP) (7 CFR part 636), and
Conservation Stewardship Program
(CSP) (7 CFR part 1470) to deliver
assistance to owners and operators of
agricultural and nonindustrial private
forest land. CCPI differs from CSP,
EQIP, and WHIP in that the initiative is
designed specifically to foster
coordination with other partners, and to
encourage additional non-Federal
investment in natural resource
conservation through the use of in-kind
services or matching funds in a
geographic area, such as a watershed.
Fund Availability
Effective on the date of this notice,
NRCS announces the availability of
financial assistance funds in the
following programs through the MRBI–
CCPI in FY 2010:
• $40 million in EQIP
• $5 million in WHIP
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
• 278,000 acres in CSP
(approximately equivalent to $5 million)
Under CCPI, partners coordinate with
NRCS to provide financial and technical
assistance to eligible landowners and
agricultural producers to reduce
nutrient loading to achieve water
quality objectives and to improve
wildlife habitat. Partners are not
required to provide financial or
technical assistance above that provided
through NRCS programs, although
partners that provide additional
resources will be given higher priority
consideration in the competitive
selection process.
All Federal funds made available will
be paid directly to program participants
through CSP and EQIP contracts and
WHIP cost-share agreements. No
technical assistance funds will be
provided to partners through an MRBI–
CCPI agreement. However, NRCS State
Conservationists may consider the
development of a separate funding
agreement with qualifying partners for
the delivery of technical services.
CCPI Program Objectives
Under CCPI, NRCS enters into multiyear agreements with eligible partner
organizations to address conservation
priorities related to agriculture and
nonindustrial private forest land.
Individual landowners and agricultural
producers are not eligible entities and
may not submit CCPI proposals, nor
may they apply for program benefits
through this proposal submission
process. In order to receive CCPI
assistance, landowners and agricultural
producers must participate within a
project area defined in an approved
CCPI agreement and enroll in EQIP,
WHIP, or CSP. Landowners and
agricultural producers interested in
applying must meet the eligibility
requirements of the program(s) for
which they are applying. Individual
landowner and agriculture producer
applications will be evaluated and
ranked by NRCS to ensure that
applications selected for funding are
most likely to achieve project objectives.
As part of the partnership agreements,
partners may help facilitate the
submission of landowner and
agricultural producers’ program
applications, provide additional
technical or financial assistance to
participating landowners and
agricultural producers, including
nonindustrial private forest landowners,
or provide other resources as defined in
the agreement. MRBI–CCPI partnership
agreements are to: (1) Address
conservation priorities involving
agriculture and nonindustrial private
forest land within the designated 8-digit
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HUC focus areas that establish treatment
needs and metrics at the 12-digit HUC
scale; (2) encourage landowners and
agricultural producers to cooperate in
meeting applicable Federal, State, and
local regulatory requirements related to
production; (3) encourage landowners
and agricultural producers to cooperate
in the installation, monitoring, and
maintenance of conservation practices;
and (4) promote the development and
demonstration of innovative
conservation practices, delivery
methods, and monitoring/evaluation of
the practices. State Conservationists
may provide guidance to potential
partners related to resource concerns,
priorities established by local working
groups and State Technical Committees,
and approved EQIP and WHIP
conservation practices and activities for
the focus areas, found at: https://
nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/
mrbi.html. State Conservationists may
tailor this practice list based on the
resource needs in the focus area;
however, CSP will not have a modified
enhancement list for MRBI–CCPI.
For each of a potential partner’s
proposed project areas (a single 12-digit
watershed or multiple 12-digit
watersheds within the designated focus
area), NRCS strongly encourages the use
of a ‘‘systems approach’’ to achieve
conservation goals. The systems
approach addresses nutrient runoff from
multiple perspectives: ‘‘Avoid’’ the
excess application of nutrients onto the
field; ‘‘Control’’ the amount nutrient
runoff from the fields into the
watershed; and ‘‘Trap’’ nutrients before
leaving the field. Once a project is
funded, producer applications that
achieve conservation goals through a
‘‘systems approach’’ will be given higher
consideration in the ranking process.
Under CCPI, where flexibility is
needed to meet project objectives, the
partner may request that program
adjustments be allowed provided such
policy, procedural, or technical
adjustments are within the scope of the
applicable programs’ statutory and
regulatory program authorities. An
example of a program adjustment may
include expediting the applicable
program ranking process in a situation
where a partner has identified the
landowners and agricultural producers
approved to participate in the project.
Other examples of adjustments may
include applying flexibility in payment
rate determinations, or using a single
area-wide plan of operations rather
individual plans of operations.
Eligible Partners
Eligible partners for CCPI include
federally-recognized Indian tribes, State
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
and local units of government, farmer
cooperatives, producer associations,
institutions of higher education, and
other non-governmental organizations
with a history of working cooperatively
with landowners and agricultural
producers to effectively address
conservation priorities related to
agriculture and nonindustrial private
forest land.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
CCPI Applications
For MRBI–CCPI, NRCS will enter into
EQIP and CSP contracts or WHIP costshare agreements directly with eligible
landowners and agricultural producers,
including nonindustrial private forest
landowners, who are participating in
the project areas (12-digit
subwatershed(s) within the designated
8-digit focus areas). Landowners and
agricultural producers interested in
participating in an approved MRBI–
CCPI project may apply for approved
MRBI–CCPI funds at their local USDA
Service Center after the Chief announces
project selection. The designated
conservationist will help the landowner
or agricultural producer determine
which applicable programs (CSP, EQIP,
or WHIP) are appropriate to apply for
depending on the conservation systems
or activities the producer seeks to install
or perform to meet the approved
partner’s project objectives. For
enrollment in the MRBI–CCPI, eligible
land is defined for each program in the
following regulations:
• EQIP: 7 CFR 1466.8(c)
• CSP: 7 CFR 1470.6(b)
• WHIP: 7 CFR 636.4(b)
Individual applications will be
evaluated and ranked by NRCS to
ensure that producer applications
selected for funding are most likely to
achieve objectives for the single 12-digit
HUC subwatershed or multiple 12-digit
HUC subwatersheds within the
designated 8-digit focus area.
Participants may have multiple
contracts through MRBI–CCPI if more
than one covered program is needed to
accomplish the project objectives.
Proposal Requirements
For consideration of a proposal
submitted through MRBI–CCPI in
response to this notice, a potential
partner must submit five copies (8.5″ ×
11″ white paper) of the written proposal
and one electronic copy on CD–ROM in
MS WORD or PDF. If submitting more
than one project proposal (proposals for
multiple 8-digit focus areas), a potential
partner must submit a separate complete
document for each project. The entire
project proposal should not exceed 15
pages in length including maps,
reference materials, or related reports.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
The basic format for the MRBI–CCPI
proposal is a narrative written response
to the questions and information
requested in this notice. There are no
forms required or associated with this
proposal process.
(1) Proposal Cover and Summary: The
first few pages of the proposal must
include:
(a) Project title.
(b) Project Director/Manager name,
telephone, and email address.
(c) Name of lead partner entity
submitting proposal and other
collaborating partners.
(d) Mailing address and telephone
numbers for lead partner.
(e) Designated 8-digit focus area and
12-digit HUC subwatershed(s), wherein
the project lies, including; State(s);
County(s); and Congressional District(s).
Include a general location map.
(f) Brief description/summary of the
project and description of resource
issues to be addressed as they relate to
MRBI priorities and objectives. Identify
the specific natural resource concerns to
be addressed.
(g) Description of planning already
completed at the field and watershed
scales that identifies conservation
practices/systems needed to address
nutrient concerns.
(h) A list of the approved NRCS FOTG
conservation practices, conservation
enhancements, and conservation
activity plans which will be used to
address those resource concerns.
(i) Proposed project start and end
dates (not to exceed a period of 5 years).
(j) Total budget for the project
including the amount of MRBI–CCPI
financial assistance being requested for
the project by program by fiscal year.
(2) Project Natural Resource
Objectives and Actions: The proposal
must include the project objectives and
the natural resource concerns that will
be addressed.
(a) Identify and provide detail about
the natural resource concern(s) to be
addressed and how the proposal
objectives will address those concerns.
Objectives should be specific,
measurable, achievable, resultsoriented, and include a time for
completion.
(b) For each objective, identify the
actions to be completed to achieve the
objective and to address the identified
natural resource concern. Specify which
actions are to be addressed through the
project using MRBI–CCPI assistance and
those being addressed through alternate
non-Federal funding sources or other
resources provided.
(3) Detailed Proposal Criteria:
Information provided in the proposal
must include:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9383
(a) A description of the partner(s)
history of working with agricultural
producers to address resource issues
and the conservation objectives to be
achieved.
(b) A detailed description of the
watershed area including emphasis on
treatment and metrics at the 12-digit
HUC subwatershed(s) within the
designated 8-digit HUC focus area
covered by the proposal, conservation
priorities in the area, conservation
objectives to be achieved, and the
expected level of participation by
producers. Proposals should state
whether a MRBI–CCPI proposal is
integrated with a MRBI–WREP or Farm
Service Agency Conservation Reserve
Program (CRP), Continuous Sign-Up
CRP (CCRP), Conservation Reserve
Enhancement Program (CREP), or
Farmable Wetlands Program (FWP)
proposed or existing project, and
include the name of any MRBI–WREP,
CRP, CCRP, CREP, or FWP proposed
project. Higher ranking may be given to
integrated proposals.
(c) A description of the partner(s) and
the roles, responsibilities, and
capabilities of the partner(s). Proposals
that include resources from partners
other than the lead partner must include
a letter or other documentation
confirming the commitment of
resources.
(d) A description of the project
duration, plan of action, and project
implementation schedule that details
when the potential partner anticipates
finishing the project and submitting a
final report. Project proposals cannot
exceed 5 years from start to completion.
(e) A description of the resources
(financial and technical assistance)
requested from each of the available
NRCS programs (EQIP, WHIP, CSP) and
the non-Federal resources provided by
the partner(s) that will be leveraged by
the Federal contribution. As determined
by the State Conservationist, a
maximum of 10 percent of total
financial assistance funds in a proposal
may be designated for edge-of-field
monitoring to address critically unmet
monitoring needs in the context of an
overall monitoring and evaluation plan
submitted by the partner. The partner is
not required to provide any specific
matching of financial or technical
resources toward the project; however,
proposals that include or offer nonFederal resources will be given higher
priority through the evaluation process.
Partners need to state clearly how they
intend to leverage Federal funds along
with partner resources. The funding and
time contribution by agricultural
producers and non-industrial forest
owners to implement agreed-to
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
9384
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
conservation systems in program
contracts may not be considered any
part of a match from the potential
partner for purposes of MRBI–CCPI.
(f) A description of the plan for
monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on
progress made toward achieving the
objectives of the agreement. The MRBI
is adopting a three-tiered monitoring
and evaluation approach designed to
assess environmental outcomes at the
field, 12-digit, and 8-digit watershed
scales. Higher priority will be given to
projects that adopt this three-tiered
approach where the partner can provide
resources or services. Higher priority
will also be given to projects that utilize
environmental indicators to monitor
water quality and evaluate effects of
conservation practices and activities
implemented through the project on a
field or edge-of-field scale as well as at
selected downstream monitoring points.
A framework for watershed and edge-offield monitoring, including
environmental indicators, can be found
at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/
mrbi/mrbi.html.
(g) Potential criteria to be used by
NRCS to prioritize and rank MRBI–CCPI
producer applications in the project
area. Additional information regarding
the process NRCS uses to evaluate and
rank individual producer applications is
found in each of the authorized program
regulations. The potential partner
should include specific producer
application ranking criteria in the
proposal, so that NRCS can evaluate
producer applications based upon the
environmental objectives of the MRBI–
CCPI project. Additional guidance and
examples of acceptable ranking criteria
may be obtained from the State
Conservationist where the project will
be located.
(h) An estimate of the percentage of
producers, including nonindustrial
private forest landowners, in the project
area that are expected to participate in
the project along with an estimate of the
total number of producers located in the
project area. Producer participation is a
requirement for delivery of MRBI–CCPI
program benefits. A statement on how
the partner will encourage participation
to increase the likelihood of project
success.
(i) A statement describing
participation by beginning farmers or
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers
or ranchers, limited resource farmers or
ranchers, and Indian tribes.
(j) A listing and description of the
conservation practices, conservation
activity plans, conservation
enhancements, and partner activities to
be implemented during the project
timeframe and the general sequence of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
project implementation. Other activities
to address are those technical assistance
efforts undertaken by the partner and
those that the partner requests NRCS to
implement using eligible approved
MRBI–CCPI conservation practices,
conservation enhancements, and project
financial assistance funding. In this
section, list all the approved MRBI–
CCPI conservation practices and
enhancements the partner wishes NRCS
to offer to producers through the MRBI–
CCPI project. A national list of the
approved MRBI–CCPI core and
supporting practices can be accessed
from https://nrcs.usda.gov/programs/
mrbi/mrbi.html; each State may have a
slightly modified list. Information about
these approved practices can be found
in the Field Office Technical Guide at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/
efotg/ or https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/
technical/standards/. For each
conservation practice, estimate the
practice extent (feet, acres, number, etc.)
the partner expects producers to
implement each fiscal year during the
life of the project and the amount of
financial assistance requested to support
implementation of each practice
through producer contracts. Information
on eligible conservation enhancements
can be found at the CSP Web site at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/
new_csp/csp.html. Indicate whether the
project will address regulatory
compliance and any other outcomes that
the partner expects to complete during
the project period. Describe any
activities that are innovative or include
outcome-based performance measures
implemented by the partner.
(k) A description of the amount of
funds needed annually for producer
contracts or agreements by eligible
program (EQIP, WHIP, and CSP). This
section of the proposal should include
the total amount of financial assistance
funds requested for each fiscal year of
the project (for MRBI–CCPI multi-State
projects provide the funds/acres by
State) to be made available for producer
contracts.
(l) A description of any requested
policy, procedure, and technical
adjustments, by program, with
explanation of why the adjustment is
needed in order to achieve the
objectives of the project.
Ranking Considerations
NRCS will evaluate proposals using a
competitive process and will give a
higher priority to proposals that:
• Demonstrate the partner’s history of
working cooperatively with landowners;
• Provide for outreach to, and
participation of, beginning farmers or
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or ranchers, limited resource farmers or
ranchers, and Indian tribes within the
area covered by the agreement;
• Facilitate the submission of
landowner applications;
• Integrate both WREP and CCPI
within a project area;
• Significantly leverage non-Federal
financial and technical resources;
• Coordinate with other local, State,
or Federal efforts, including with Farm
Service Agency program efforts (e.g.,
CRP, CCRP, CREP, FWP) and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
funded watershed efforts (e.g. 319
projects);
• Provide for matching financial or
technical assistance funds to assist
participants with the implementation of
their EQIP and CSP contracts and WHIP
cost-share agreements;
• Assist the participants in meeting
local, State, and Federal regulatory
requirements;
• Demonstrate the partner’s financial
commitment to provide for water
quality monitoring and evaluation of
conservation practices, enhancements,
and activities;
• Have a high potential to achieve
water quality objectives through
phosphorous (P) or nitrogen (N) nutrient
reduction;
• Have a high potential to improve
wildlife habitat;
• For WHIP and EQIP applications,
include multiple core and supporting
practices from each practice category
(avoiding, controlling, and trapping)
from the State-approved MRBI–CCPI
practice list;
• Provide innovation in approved
conservation practices, conservation
methods, and delivery including
outcome-based performance measures
and methods;
• Have a high potential to maintain
agricultural productivity;
• Provide evidence of a watershed
planning process that:
Æ Identifies nutrients (N or P) causing
water quality problems and identifies
their sources enabling implementation
to be prioritized,
Æ Identifies quantifiable project goals
for field-scale nutrient management and
watershed-scale nutrient load reduction,
Æ Identifies conservation practices
and systems to be utilized to accomplish
project goals/objectives,
Æ Identifies technical assistance and
financial assistance needed,
Æ Includes an information and
education component,
Æ Lists measurable interim milestones
that relate to project goals, and
Æ Presents criteria for evaluation and
adaptive management;
• Convert land from cropping systems
to permanent vegetative practices when
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
supported by landowners and
agricultural producers as part of overall
agricultural operation;
• Adopt a three-tiered monitoring
approach whereby the partner provides
resources or services to conduct water
quality monitoring activities and to
evaluate the effects of conservation
practices and activities implemented
through the project on a field or edgeof-field scale, as well as at selected
downstream monitoring points;
• Complete the application of the
conservation practices, systems, or
activities on all of the covered program
contracts or cost-share agreements in
less than 5 years;
• Have a high percentage of
producers involved and working
agricultural or nonindustrial private
forest land included in the area covered
by the agreement; and
• Deliver high percentages of applied
conservation to address water quality,
water conservation, or State, regional, or
national conservation initiatives.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Part B: MRBI–WREP
Section 2206 of the 2008 Act
establishes the WREP by amending
section 1237A(h) of the Food Security
Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3837a(h)). Under
WREP, NRCS enters into agreements
with eligible partners to help enhance
conservation outcomes on wetlands and
adjacent lands. The purpose of WREP as
part of MRBI is to target and leverage
resources to protect, restore, and
enhance wetlands; improve wildlife
habitat; and reduce nutrient loading to
achieve water quality objectives through
agreements with eligible partners.
Eligible partners include States
(including a political subdivision or
agency of a State), nongovernment
organizations, and Indian tribes.
Fund Availability
Effective on the date of this notice, the
CCC announces the availability of $25
million in financial assistance funds for
WREP through the MRBI in FY 2010 to
eligible landowners in the designated
focus areas (8-digit HUCs).
WREP is administered under the
Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) and is
a voluntary program designed to foster
coordination with partners and to
encourage non-Federal investment in
natural resource conservation through
the use of matching funds and in-kind
services. WREP partners are required to
contribute a financial match of at least
5 percent of the acquisition or
restoration costs toward the project.
Proposals which include resources
provided by additional partners will be
given higher priority consideration in
the selection process. Contributions
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
provided by the partners can be in the
form of technical and financial
assistance for the protection, restoration,
and enhancement of the wetland.
Partner contributions can also be used
for management and monitoring
activities. Additional contributions
beyond the required financial match can
be in-kind services or cash.
Eligible Partners
Under WREP, NRCS enters into multiyear agreements with eligible partners.
Eligible partners for WREP include State
and local units of government, Indian
tribes, or nongovernmental
organizations.
Eligible partners should submit
complete proposals addressing the
conservation objectives to be achieved
within 12-digit HUC subwatershed(s)
within designated 8-digit HUC focus
areas. Proposals that integrate wetland
protection, restoration, and
enhancement activities within a
proposed MRBI–CCPI project area will
be given higher priority consideration in
the selection process. Wetland
restoration and enhancement actions
will be designed to maximize wildlife
habitat values and water quality
according to the WRP regulation, 7 CFR
part 1467, and NRCS FOTG standards
and specifications. Proposals must
conform to the WRP guidelines for
restoration and management of lands
subject to a WRP easement or contract.
Landowner Applications
For WREP, once a project area has
been approved and announced, eligible
landowners may apply for WRP through
their local NRCS office. The land
eligibility criteria for WREP are the
same as for WRP and are listed in 7 CFR
part 1467.4. NRCS and the partner will
assist landowners in determining
whether the application is appropriate
for WREP depending on the wetland
protection, restoration, and
enhancement activities that the
applicant seeks to install or perform. In
FY 2010, NRCS will make WREP funds
available to eligible landowners to
enroll land under a permanent
easement; a 30-year easement; or on
acreage owned by Indian tribes, a 30year contract.
WREP financial and technical
assistance is delivered to eligible
landowners in approved project areas
through easement acquisition,
conservation program contracts,
cooperative agreements, contribution
agreements, or Federal contracts.
Restoration may be achieved through
payments to other parties.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9385
Proposal Requirements
For consideration of a proposal
submitted through MRBI–WREP, a
potential partner must submit five
copies (8.5″ x 11″ white paper) of the
written proposal and one electronic
copy on CD–ROM in MS WORD or PDF.
If submitting more than one project
proposal (proposals for multiple 8-digit
focus areas), a potential partner must
submit a separate complete document
for each project. The entire project
proposal should not exceed 15 pages in
length including maps, reference
materials, or related reports.
The basic format for the WREP
proposal is a narrative written response
to the questions and information
requested in this notice. There are no
forms required or associated with the
WREP proposal process.
(1) Proposal Cover and Summary: The
first few pages of the proposal must
include:
(a) Project title.
(b) Project Director/Manager name,
telephone, and e-mail address.
(c) Name of lead partner submitting
proposal and other collaborating
partners.
(d) Mailing address and telephone
numbers for lead partner.
(e) Designated 8-digit focus area and
12-digit HUC subwatershed(s), wherein
the project lies, including; State(s);
County(s); and Congressional District(s).
Include a general location map.
(f) Short general description/summary
of project.
(g) Potential acres to be enrolled in
the project area.
(h) Proposed project start and end
dates (not to exceed a period of 5 years).
(i) Total budget for the project
including the amount of WREP financial
assistance being requested for the
project.
(2) Project Natural Resource
Objectives and Actions: The proposal
must address wetland restoration,
including water quality concerns, in 12digit subwatershed(s), located within
the 8-digit focus areas, and the
objectives of the project to address those
concerns.
(a) Identify and provide detail about
the natural resource concern(s) to be
addressed and how the proposal’s
objectives will address those concerns.
Objectives should be specific,
measurable, achievable, resultsoriented, and include a timeframe for
completion.
(b) For each objective, identify the
actions to be completed to achieve that
objective and address the identified
natural resource concern. Specify which
actions are to be addressed through this
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
9386
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
project using WREP assistance, and
which are being addressed through
alternate non-Federal funding sources or
other resources provided.
(c) Identify the total acres that require
wetland protection, restoration, and
enhancement.
(3) Detailed Proposal Criteria:
Information provided in the proposal
must include:
(a) A description of the partner(s)
history of working with landowners to
address natural resource issues.
(b) A detailed description of the 12digit subwatershed(s) within the
designated 8-digit focus area covered by
the proposal, including a specific
watershed map which indicates the
project location. Proposals should state
whether an MRBI–WREP proposal is
integrated with an MRBI–CCPI proposed
project, and include the name of the
MRBI–CCPI proposed project.
(c) A description of the partner(s) and
the roles, responsibilities, and
capabilities of the partner(s). Proposals
which include resources from partners
other than the lead partner must include
a letter or other documentation
confirming the commitment of
resources.
(d) A description of the project
duration, plan of action, and project
implementation schedule. Project
proposals cannot exceed 5 years.
(e) A description of the financial
assistance resources that are requested
through the MRBI–WREP, and the nonFederal resources provided by the
partner(s) that will be leveraged by the
Federal contribution. The partner is
required to contribute a financial match
of at least 5 percent of the acquisition
or restoration costs toward the project.
Proposals that include additional nonFederal resources will be given higher
priority consideration in the selection
process. The partner needs to clearly
state how they intend to leverage
Federal funds along with partner
resources. The funding and time
contribution by landowners to
implement agreed-to wetland
restoration and enhancement practices
may not be considered any part of a
match from the potential partner for
purposes of WREP.
(f) An estimate of the percentage of
potential landowners in the project area
that may participate in the project along
with an estimate of the total number of
potential landowners located in the
project area. A statement on how the
partner will encourage participation to
increase the likelihood of project
success.
(g) A statement describing
participation by beginning farmers and
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
or ranchers, limited resource farmers or
ranchers, and Indian tribes.
(h) A description of the wetland
protection, restoration, and
enhancement activities to be
implemented during the project
timeframe, and the general sequence of
implementation of the project. Activities
may include those efforts undertaken by
the partner and those that the partner
requests NRCS to address through
financial support.
(i) The amount of funds needed
annually for easement acquisition and
wetland restoration and enhancement
activities.
(j) A description of how the partner
will provide outreach, especially to
beginning farmers or ranchers, socially
disadvantaged farmers and ranchers,
limited resource farmers or ranchers,
and Indian tribes.
Ranking Considerations
The appropriate State Conservationist
will evaluate proposals using a
competitive process and forward
recommended proposals to the Chief.
The Chief will give a higher priority to
proposals that:
• Demonstrate the partner’s history of
working cooperatively with landowners;
• Provide for outreach to, and
participation of, beginning farmers or
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers
or ranchers, limited resource farmers or
ranchers, and Indian tribes within the
area to be covered by the agreement;
• Facilitate the submission of
landowner applications;
• Significantly leverage non-Federal
financial and technical resources;
• Coordinate with other local, State,
tribal, or Federal efforts, including with
Farm Service Agency proposed or
existing program efforts (e.g. CRP,
Continuous Sign-Up CRP, CREP, FWP,
and EPA-funded watershed efforts (e.g.
319 projects);
• Assist the participants in meeting
local, State, tribal, and Federal
regulatory requirements;
• Provide for monitoring and
evaluation of the effectiveness of the
restoration activities on water quality;
• Have a high potential to achieve
water quality objectives through
phosphorous (P) or nitrogen (N) nutrient
reduction;
• Have a high potential to maximize
habitat for migratory birds and other
wetland-dependent wildlife;
• Provide innovation in wetland
protection, restoration, and
enhancement methods and outcomebased performance measures and
methods;
• Provide evidence that wetland
restoration and enhancement activities
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will be completed within 2 years of
closing on the easement;
• Provide for matching financial or
technical assistance funds to assist
landowners with the implementation of
the Wetlands Reserve Plan of
Operations and associated contracts;
and
• Integrate wetland protection,
restoration, and enhancement activities
within a proposed MRBI–CCPI project
area.
Review of MRBI–CCPI and MRBI–
WREP Proposals
The State Conservationist(s) will
review the proposals to address:
• Potential cooperation or duplication
of efforts with other projects or existing
programs;
• Adherence to, and consistency
with, program regulation including
requirements related to land and
producer eligibility and use of approved
NRCS resource concerns and
conservation practices, conservation
enhancements, and other program
requirements;
• Expected benefits for project
implementation in their State(s);
• Other issues or concerns the State
Conservationist is aware of that should
be considered by the Chief; and
• A general recommendation for
support or denial of project approval.
Prior to submission of the proposal,
potential partners are strongly
encouraged to consult with the
appropriate State Conservationist(s)
during proposal development to obtain
guidance as to appropriate resource
concerns to address conservation
practices, wetland restoration,
enhancement activities needed, and
other details of the project proposal.
All proposals submitted become the
property of NRCS for use in the
administration of the program, may be
filed or disposed of by the agency, and
will not be returned to the potential
partner. Once proposals have been
submitted to the agency for review and
ranking, there will be no further
opportunity to change or re-submit the
proposal document.
Acknowledgement of Submission and
Notifications
Partners whose proposals have been
selected will receive a letter of official
notification from the Chief. The Chief
will make the final selection for all
projects based on the ranking criteria
listed above. Upon notification of
selection, the partner should contact the
NRCS State Conservationist listed in the
letter to develop the required
partnership agreement and other project
implementation requirements. Partner
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
9387
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
submissions of proposals not selected
will be notified by mail.
Withdrawal of Proposals
Partner proposals may be withdrawn
by written notice to the Chief or State
Conservationist at any time prior to
selection.
Partnership Agreements
NRCS will enter a partnership
agreement with a selected partner who
has an approved project as the
mechanism for participation in MRBI–
CCPI or MRBI–WREP. At a minimum,
the partnership agreement will address:
• The role of the partner;
• The role of NRCS;
• The responsibilities of the partner
relating to water quality monitoring and
evaluation if included as part of the
proposal. NRCS reserves the right to
negotiate with the partners on
refinements to the monitoring and
evaluation plan to address MRBI
objectives;
• The format and frequency of reports
(semi-annual, annual, and final) that are
required as a condition of the
agreement;
• Plan of work and budget to identify
other funding sources (if applicable) for
financial or technical assistance;
• The specified project schedule; and
• Other requirements deemed
necessary by NRCS to further the
purposes of the MRBI–CCPI or MRBI–
WREP project.
Once a project is selected, NRCS will
evaluate a project’s progress throughout
the project lifecycle. NRCS will enter
into a project agreement for the
necessary funds agreed to for FY 2010.
In proposed projects years beyond FY
2010, NRCS may obligate additional
funds without further competition based
on an assessment of the project’s
effectiveness in achieving MRBI
objectives and the availability of funds.
Waiver Authority
To assist in the implementation of
WREP or CCPI projects, the Chief may
waive the applicability of the Adjusted
Gross Income Limitation on a case-bycase basis in accordance with policy
and processes promulgated in 7 CFR
part 1400. Such waiver requests must be
submitted in writing from the program
applicant, addressed to the Chief, and
submitted through the local NRCS
district conservationist.
Signed this 23rd day of February 2010, in
Washington, DC.
Dave White,
Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation and Chief, Natural Resources
Conservation Service.
Attachment
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE CONSERVATIONISTS—MRBI STATES
Name
Address
Phone
Arkansas ...............................
Michael E. Sullivan .............
michael.sullivan@ar.usda.gov.
William J. Gradle ................
(217) 353–6601
bill.gradle@il.usda.gov.
Indiana ..................................
Jane E. Hardisty .................
(317) 290–3200
jane.hardisty@inn.usda.gov.
Iowa ......................................
Richard Sims ......................
(515) 284–6655
richard.sims@ia.usda.gov.
Kentucky ...............................
Tom Perrin .........................
(859) 224–7350
tom.perrin@ky.usda.gov.
Louisiana ..............................
Kevin D. Norton ..................
(318) 473–7751
kevin.norton@la.usda.gov.
Minnesota .............................
Jennifer Heglund ................
(651) 602–7900
jennifer.heglund@mn.usda.gov.
Mississippi ............................
Homer Wilkes .....................
(601) 965–5205
homer.wilkes@ms.usda.gov.
Missouri ................................
J.R. Flores ..........................
(573) 876–0901
Jr.flores@mo.usda.gov.
Ohio ......................................
Terry J. Cosby ....................
(614) 255–2472
terry.cosby@oh.usda.gov.
Tennessee ............................
Kevin Brown .......................
(615) 277–2531
kevin.brown@tn.usda.gov.
Wisconsin .............................
Patricia Leavenworth ..........
Federal Building, Room
3416, 700 West Capitol
Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201–3228.
2118 W. Park Court, Champaign, Illinois 61821.
6013 Lakeside Boulevard,
Indianapolis, Indiana
46278–2933.
693 Federal Building, 210
Walnut Street, Suite 693,
Des Moines, Iowa 50309–
2180.
771 Corporate Drive, Suite
110, Lexington, Kentucky
40503–5479.
3737 Government Street, Alexandria, Louisiana 71302.
375 Jackson Street, Suite
600, St. Paul, Minnesota
55101–1854.
Suite 1321, Federal Building, 100 West Capitol
Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39269–1399.
Parkade Center, Suite 250,
601 Business Loop 70
West, Columbia, Missouri
65203–2546.
200 North High Street,
Room 522, Columbus,
Ohio 43215–2478.
675 U.S. Courthouse, 801
Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee 37203–3878.
8030 Excelsior Drive, Suite
200, Madison, Wisconsin
53717.
(501) 301–3100
Illinois ....................................
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
State
(608) 662–4422
pat.leavenworth@wi.usda.gov.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
E-mail address
02MRN1
9388
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday.
[FR Doc. 2010–4275 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Prescott National Forest, Bradshaw
Ranger District; Arizona; Bradshaw
Vegetation Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This project is a proposal to
improve the health of fire adapted
ecosystems while simultaneously
reducing hazardous fuels on the
Bradshaw Ranger District. The project
area encompasses about 55,554 acres.
Within the project area, the proposal is
to commercially thin approximately
16,312 acres in ponderosa pine, pineoak, and mixed conifer forest types.
Fuels treatments include mechanized
fuel reduction on 34,445 acres of
chaparral, pinyon-juniper, and oak sites
and non-mechanized fuel reduction
treatments on 6,242 acres of chaparral,
juniper, pinyon, oak, pine, and mixed
conifer sites. Prescribed fire is proposed
on 44,641 acres and fuelbreak
construction is proposed on 791 acres.
It is expected that this project will
require a site specific forest plan
amendment to the Prescott National
Forest Land and Resource Management
Plan (1986), as amended, in order to
implement treatments within Mexican
Spotted Owl habitat.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis should be received
within 30 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in December, 2010 and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected in March, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Jodi Stevens, Bradshaw Ranger District,
344 South Cortez Street, Prescott,
Arizona 86303. Comments may also be
submitted by e-mail to: commentssouthwestern-prescott@fs.fed.us.
Include ‘‘Bradshaw Vegetation
Management’’ in the subject line of
e-mail comments. Electronic comments
must be submitted in Word (.doc),
RichText (.rtf), or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
format.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jodi
Stevens, 928–443–8041 or
jodistevens@fs.fed.us. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Purpose and Need for Action: The
purpose of the proposed action is to
improve the health of fire adapted
ecosystems while simultaneously
reducing hazardous fuels. The EIS will
describe existing conditions and desired
conditions, analyze environmental
consequences of shifting existing
conditions towards desired conditions,
and assist the decision maker in
selecting management strategies that
will achieve desired conditons. The
proposed action is needed due to
prominent changes in the structure and
function of vegetation and fire behavior
within the analysis area, and the
proximity of homes and private
property to these changed conditions.
The changes in vegetation and fire
behavior are a result of aggressive fire
suppression over the past several
decades. One of the most effective ways
to protect communities is to create
defensible fuel profile zones both
adjacent to homes and private property
and on adjacent public lands.
Proposed Action: The Prescott
National Forest proposes to
commercially thin approximately
16,312 acres in ponderosa pine, pineoak, and mixed conifer forest types.
Proposed fuels treatments include
mechanized fuel reduction on 34,445
acres of chaparral, pinyon-juniper, and
oak sites, and non-mechanized fuel
reduction treatments on 6,242 acres of
chaparral, juniper, pinyon, oak, pine,
and mixed conifer sites. Prescribed fire
is proposed on 44,641 acres and
fuelbreak construction is proposed on
791 acres. The project area is located to
the southeast, south, southwest, west
and northwest of the city of Prescott.
Implementation of this proposed project
could begin as early as June 1, 2011.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for this
project is the Forest Supervisor, Prescott
National Forest, Prescott, Arizona.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service will evaluate the
proposed action and alternatives to the
proposed action. After reviewing the
proposed action, the alternatives, the
environmental analysis, and considering
public comment, the Forest Supervisor
will reach a decision that is in
accordance with the purpose and need
for this project. The decision will
include a description of activities that
will be implemented. Issues identified
as being outside the scope of this
proposal (such as grazing cattle on the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest or the need for additional
recreation opportunities) will not be
addressed in this planning effort.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. It is important that
reviewers provide their comments at
such times and in such manner that
they are useful to the agency’s
preparation of the environmental impact
statement. Therefore, comments should
be provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
be as specific as possible. There will be
a public scoping meeting on Thursday,
February 25, 2010 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
Arizona Time. This meeting will be held
at the Mackin Building at the Prescott
Rodeo Grounds, 840 Rodeo Drive,
Prescott, AZ, 86305. Scoping letters will
be mailed to individuals and entities
who have identified themselves as
interested publics regarding proposed
actions on the Prescott National Forest.
Additionally, scoping input will be
requested through a publication in the
Prescott Courier, the newspaper of local
circulation in the proposed project area.
Dated: February 18, 2010.
Reta Laford,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Prescott National
Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010–3965 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
Board for International Food and
Agricultural Development; One
Hundred and Fifty-Ninth Meeting;
Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, notice is hereby given of
the one hundred and fifty-ninth meeting
of the Board for International Food and
Agricultural Development (BIFAD). The
meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. on March 3, 2010 at the National
Press Club located at 529 14th St., NW.,
Washington, DC. ‘‘Higher Education: A
Critical Partner in Global Agricultural
Development’’ will be the central theme
of BIFAD’s initiatives and the March
meeting.
Dr. Robert Easter, Chairman of BIFAD,
will preside over the proceedings. Dr.
Easter is Interim Chancellor for the
University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.
The confirmation of Dr. Rajiv Shah as
USAID’s new administrator will define
the work of BIFAD, consistent with
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9380-9388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4275]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 9380]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Cooperative Conservation Partners Initiative; Wetlands Reserve
Enhancement Program
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of request for proposals through the Mississippi River
Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS), who is Vice President of the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC), announces the availability of financial assistance funds in
fiscal year (FY) 2010 for up to $50 million in the Cooperative
Conservation Partnership Initiative (CCPI) and $25 million in the
Wetlands Reserve Enhancement Program (WREP) through the Mississippi
River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) to eligible
participants in 12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) subwatershed(s)
within the 41 designated focus areas (8-digit HUCs) in the following
States: Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. The
purpose of this notice is to solicit proposals from potential partners
to enter into partnership agreements with NRCS, and to inform
agricultural producers and landowners of the future availability of
program funds through approved partnership projects.
DATES: Effective Date: The Notice of Request is effective March 2,
2010.
Eligible partners may submit proposals by mail or via courier.
By mail, proposals must be postmarked by May 3, 2010.
By courier, proposals must be delivered by May 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written proposals should be submitted to the addresses
identified below, with copies to the appropriate NRCS State
Conservationist, whose names and addresses are identified as an
attachment to this notice. If a project is multi-State in scope, all
State Conservationists in the proposed project area must be sent the
proposal for review.
By mail: Gregory K. Johnson, Director, Financial
Assistance Programs Division, Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
5241 South Building, Washington, DC 20250. (Note: Registered or
Certified Mail to a Post Office may not be used.)
By courier: Gregory K. Johnson, Director, Financial
Assistance Programs Division, Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
5241 South Building, Washington, DC 20250, Telephone: (202) 720-1845.
All proposals will be accepted between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Please ask the guard at the
entrance to the South Building to call (202) 720-1845.
State Conservationists will review and comment on eligible
proposals and will share them with their State Technical Committee for
input and feedback. Proposals submitted via fax, email, or after the
deadline date or times listed in this notice will not be considered.
Proposals submitted via the grants.gov Web site will not be considered.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CCPI projects: Gregory K.
Johnson, Director, Financial Assistance Programs Division, Department
of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Room 5241 South Building, Washington, DC
20250; Telephone: (202) 720-1845; Fax: (202) 720-4264; or e-mail: MRBI-CCPI@wdc.usda.gov. Additional information regarding CCPI is available
at the following NRCS Web page: http:[sol][sol]www.nrcs.usda.gov/
programs/CCPI/
WREP projects: Andree DuVarney, Acting Director, Easement
Programs Division, Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6819 South
Building, Washington, DC 20250; Telephone: (202) 720-1854; Fax: (202)
720-9689; or e-mail: MRBI-WREP@wdc.usda.gov. Additional information
regarding WREP is available at the following NRCS Web page:
http:[sol][sol]www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/WRP
Monitoring and Evaluation: Mike Hubbs, Director,
Ecological Sciences Division, Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
6158 South Building, Washington, DC 20250; Telephone: (202) 720-5992;
Fax: (202) 720-2646; or email: Mike.Hubbs@wdc.usda.gov
MRBI Information: Information concerning MRBI can be found
at the following Web page: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/mrbi.html
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for communication (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should
contact the USDA Target Center at: (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 2904 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Act) requires that the implementation of this provision be
carried out without regard to the Paperwork Reduction Act, Chapter 35
of title 44, U.S.C. Therefore, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) is
not reporting recordkeeping or estimated paperwork burden associated
with this amendment.
Background
The Mississippi River Basin is a critical ecosystem within the
United States. Its entire land mass, totaling 41 percent of the
contiguous United States and 15 percent of North America, drains into
the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico. Stretching 2,350 miles
from its headwaters at Lake Itasca, Minnesota, to the mouth of the Gulf
of Mexico, the Mississippi River carries an average of 436,000 tons of
sediment each day. Nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorus, contribute
to both local water quality problems and the hypoxic zone in the Gulf
of Mexico.
To help solve these water quality problems, NRCS has developed the
MRBI. Through this new initiative, NRCS and its partners will help
landowners and operators in selected watersheds in the Mississippi
River Basin voluntarily implement conservation systems that avoid,
control, and trap nutrient runoff; protect, restore, and enhance
wetlands; maintain agricultural productivity;
[[Page 9381]]
improve wildlife habitat; and achieve other MRBI objectives.
Within the designated focus areas in the Mississippi River Basin,
NRCS announces the availability of financial assistance funds in FY
2010 for up $50 million in the CCPI and $25 million in the WREP to
eligible participants through approved partnership projects in the
following States: Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, and
Wisconsin.
Forty-one focus areas (watersheds) have been selected by NRCS State
Conservationists, with input from the State Technical Committees and
State water quality agencies, to help improve water quality by reducing
nitrogen and phosphorous levels in the Mississippi River Basin. The
selected watersheds are listed below. Using CCPI and WREP, NRCS will
leverage partner contributions and accelerate conservation assistance
to improve water quality; protect, restore, and enhance wetlands;
enhance wildlife habitat; and achieve other MRBI objectives. Entities
interested in partnering with NRCS in the MRBI must submit separate
proposals for CCPI and WREP to the addresses identified in this notice.
NRCS will not accept joint CCPI and WREP proposals in FY 2010.
Accordingly, an entity is encouraged to submit a proposal for each
program. Proposals that integrate CCPI and WREP within a project area
will receive higher priority. Entities should note in their
applications that proposals have been submitted for both CCPI and WREP,
when applicable.
Focus Areas
Eligible partners should submit complete proposals addressing the
conservation objectives to be achieved in one or more 12-digit HUC
subwatersheds within the designated 8-digit focus area or areas. The
designated focus areas listed by 8-digit HUC are below. A complete list
of the smaller-scale, 12-digit HUC subwatersheds within the designated
8-digit focus areas can be found at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/unit_code_lists.html.
Designated Focus Areas for the MRBI FY 2010 (8-Digit HUCs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hydrologic
State(s) Watershed unit code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas/Missouri.............. Cache.................. 08020302
Arkansas....................... Lake Conway-Point 11110203
Remove.
Arkansas....................... L'Anguille............. 08020205
Arkansas/Missouri.............. Lower St. Francis...... 08020203
Illinois....................... Lower Illinois- 07130001
Senachwine Lake.
Illinois....................... Upper Illinois......... 07130005
Illinois....................... Vermillion (Upper 07130002
Mississippi River sub-
basin).
Illinois/Indiana............... Vermillion (Upper Ohio 05120109
River sub-basin).
Indiana........................ Eel.................... 05120104
Indiana........................ Upper East Fork White.. 05120206
Indiana........................ Wildcat................ 05120107
Indiana/Ohio................... Upper Wabash........... 05120101
Iowa........................... Boone.................. 07100005
Iowa........................... Maquoketa.............. 07060006
Iowa........................... North Raccoon.......... 07100006
Iowa/Minnesota................. Upper Cedar............ 07080201
Kentucky/Tennessee............. Bayou De Chien-Mayfield 08010201
Kentucky....................... Licking................ 05100101
Kentucky....................... Lower Green............ 05110005
Louisiana...................... Mermentau.............. 08080202
Louisiana/Arkansas............. Bayou Macon............ 08050002
Louisiana/Arkansas............. Boeuf River............ 08050001
Minnesota...................... Middle Minnesota....... 07020007
Minnesota...................... Root................... 07040008
Minnesota...................... Sauk................... 07010202
Mississippi.................... Big Sunflower.......... 08030207
Mississippi/Louisiana/Arkansas. Deer-Steele............ 08030209
Mississippi.................... Upper Yazoo............ 08030206
Missouri/Iowa.................. Lower Grand............ 10280103
Missouri....................... North Fork Salt........ 07110005
Missouri....................... South Fork Salt........ 07110006
Missouri/Arkansas.............. Little River Ditches... 08020204
Ohio/Indiana................... Upper Great Miami...... 05080001
Ohio........................... Upper Scioto........... 05060001
Tennessee...................... Forked Deer............ 08010206
Tennessee/Kentucky............. Obion.................. 08010202
Tennessee...................... South Fork Obion....... 08010203
Tennessee/Kentucky............. Red River.............. 05130206
Wisconsin/Illinois............. Sugar.................. 07090004
Wisconsin/Illinois............. Upper Rock............. 07090001
Wisconsin/Illinois............. Pecatonica............. 07090003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitting Proposals
Potential partners must submit a complete proposal to Gregory K.
Johnson, Director, Financial Assistance Programs Division, addressing
all questions and items listed in the appropriate subpart of this
notice. Potential partners should recognize that the proposal is the
only document
[[Page 9382]]
NRCS will use in the evaluation process. The proposal must include
sufficient detail to allow NRCS to understand the partner's priority
resource concerns, objectives, and expected outcomes. Incomplete
proposals and those that do not meet the requirements set forth in this
notice will not be considered, and notification of elimination will be
mailed to the applicant. Proposal evaluation will be based upon a
competitive process and the criteria established under the appropriate
CCPI or WREP proposal requirements. Proposals for CCPI and WREP must be
submitted separately.
To further explain how each of these watershed-based initiatives
work and specify how to submit proposals for CCPI and WREP, NRCS
identifies the policies and processes below.
Part A: MRBI-CCPI
Section 2707 of the 2008 Act established the CCPI by amending
section 1243 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3843). The
Request for Proposals contains a number of new terms and words which
would normally be included in a definitions section. However, in order
to reduce content and improve readability of this notice, definitions
may be obtained by contacting the persons referenced in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section and online at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/mrbi.html or https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/ccpi.
CCPI is a voluntary initiative that uses the funds, policies, and
processes of conservation programs under Subtitle D of Title XII of the
Food Security Act, specifically the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program (EQIP) (7 CFR part 1466), Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program
(WHIP) (7 CFR part 636), and Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) (7
CFR part 1470) to deliver assistance to owners and operators of
agricultural and nonindustrial private forest land. CCPI differs from
CSP, EQIP, and WHIP in that the initiative is designed specifically to
foster coordination with other partners, and to encourage additional
non-Federal investment in natural resource conservation through the use
of in-kind services or matching funds in a geographic area, such as a
watershed.
Fund Availability
Effective on the date of this notice, NRCS announces the
availability of financial assistance funds in the following programs
through the MRBI-CCPI in FY 2010:
$40 million in EQIP
$5 million in WHIP
278,000 acres in CSP (approximately equivalent to $5
million)
Under CCPI, partners coordinate with NRCS to provide financial and
technical assistance to eligible landowners and agricultural producers
to reduce nutrient loading to achieve water quality objectives and to
improve wildlife habitat. Partners are not required to provide
financial or technical assistance above that provided through NRCS
programs, although partners that provide additional resources will be
given higher priority consideration in the competitive selection
process.
All Federal funds made available will be paid directly to program
participants through CSP and EQIP contracts and WHIP cost-share
agreements. No technical assistance funds will be provided to partners
through an MRBI-CCPI agreement. However, NRCS State Conservationists
may consider the development of a separate funding agreement with
qualifying partners for the delivery of technical services.
CCPI Program Objectives
Under CCPI, NRCS enters into multi-year agreements with eligible
partner organizations to address conservation priorities related to
agriculture and nonindustrial private forest land. Individual
landowners and agricultural producers are not eligible entities and may
not submit CCPI proposals, nor may they apply for program benefits
through this proposal submission process. In order to receive CCPI
assistance, landowners and agricultural producers must participate
within a project area defined in an approved CCPI agreement and enroll
in EQIP, WHIP, or CSP. Landowners and agricultural producers interested
in applying must meet the eligibility requirements of the program(s)
for which they are applying. Individual landowner and agriculture
producer applications will be evaluated and ranked by NRCS to ensure
that applications selected for funding are most likely to achieve
project objectives.
As part of the partnership agreements, partners may help facilitate
the submission of landowner and agricultural producers' program
applications, provide additional technical or financial assistance to
participating landowners and agricultural producers, including
nonindustrial private forest landowners, or provide other resources as
defined in the agreement. MRBI-CCPI partnership agreements are to: (1)
Address conservation priorities involving agriculture and nonindustrial
private forest land within the designated 8-digit HUC focus areas that
establish treatment needs and metrics at the 12-digit HUC scale; (2)
encourage landowners and agricultural producers to cooperate in meeting
applicable Federal, State, and local regulatory requirements related to
production; (3) encourage landowners and agricultural producers to
cooperate in the installation, monitoring, and maintenance of
conservation practices; and (4) promote the development and
demonstration of innovative conservation practices, delivery methods,
and monitoring/evaluation of the practices. State Conservationists may
provide guidance to potential partners related to resource concerns,
priorities established by local working groups and State Technical
Committees, and approved EQIP and WHIP conservation practices and
activities for the focus areas, found at: https://nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/mrbi.html. State Conservationists may tailor this
practice list based on the resource needs in the focus area; however,
CSP will not have a modified enhancement list for MRBI-CCPI.
For each of a potential partner's proposed project areas (a single
12-digit watershed or multiple 12-digit watersheds within the
designated focus area), NRCS strongly encourages the use of a ``systems
approach'' to achieve conservation goals. The systems approach
addresses nutrient runoff from multiple perspectives: ``Avoid'' the
excess application of nutrients onto the field; ``Control'' the amount
nutrient runoff from the fields into the watershed; and ``Trap''
nutrients before leaving the field. Once a project is funded, producer
applications that achieve conservation goals through a ``systems
approach'' will be given higher consideration in the ranking process.
Under CCPI, where flexibility is needed to meet project objectives,
the partner may request that program adjustments be allowed provided
such policy, procedural, or technical adjustments are within the scope
of the applicable programs' statutory and regulatory program
authorities. An example of a program adjustment may include expediting
the applicable program ranking process in a situation where a partner
has identified the landowners and agricultural producers approved to
participate in the project. Other examples of adjustments may include
applying flexibility in payment rate determinations, or using a single
area-wide plan of operations rather individual plans of operations.
Eligible Partners
Eligible partners for CCPI include federally-recognized Indian
tribes, State
[[Page 9383]]
and local units of government, farmer cooperatives, producer
associations, institutions of higher education, and other non-
governmental organizations with a history of working cooperatively with
landowners and agricultural producers to effectively address
conservation priorities related to agriculture and nonindustrial
private forest land.
CCPI Applications
For MRBI-CCPI, NRCS will enter into EQIP and CSP contracts or WHIP
cost-share agreements directly with eligible landowners and
agricultural producers, including nonindustrial private forest
landowners, who are participating in the project areas (12-digit
subwatershed(s) within the designated 8-digit focus areas). Landowners
and agricultural producers interested in participating in an approved
MRBI-CCPI project may apply for approved MRBI-CCPI funds at their local
USDA Service Center after the Chief announces project selection. The
designated conservationist will help the landowner or agricultural
producer determine which applicable programs (CSP, EQIP, or WHIP) are
appropriate to apply for depending on the conservation systems or
activities the producer seeks to install or perform to meet the
approved partner's project objectives. For enrollment in the MRBI-CCPI,
eligible land is defined for each program in the following regulations:
EQIP: 7 CFR 1466.8(c)
CSP: 7 CFR 1470.6(b)
WHIP: 7 CFR 636.4(b)
Individual applications will be evaluated and ranked by NRCS to
ensure that producer applications selected for funding are most likely
to achieve objectives for the single 12-digit HUC subwatershed or
multiple 12-digit HUC subwatersheds within the designated 8-digit focus
area. Participants may have multiple contracts through MRBI-CCPI if
more than one covered program is needed to accomplish the project
objectives.
Proposal Requirements
For consideration of a proposal submitted through MRBI-CCPI in
response to this notice, a potential partner must submit five copies
(8.5'' x 11'' white paper) of the written proposal and one electronic
copy on CD-ROM in MS WORD or PDF. If submitting more than one project
proposal (proposals for multiple 8-digit focus areas), a potential
partner must submit a separate complete document for each project. The
entire project proposal should not exceed 15 pages in length including
maps, reference materials, or related reports.
The basic format for the MRBI-CCPI proposal is a narrative written
response to the questions and information requested in this notice.
There are no forms required or associated with this proposal process.
(1) Proposal Cover and Summary: The first few pages of the proposal
must include:
(a) Project title.
(b) Project Director/Manager name, telephone, and email address.
(c) Name of lead partner entity submitting proposal and other
collaborating partners.
(d) Mailing address and telephone numbers for lead partner.
(e) Designated 8-digit focus area and 12-digit HUC subwatershed(s),
wherein the project lies, including; State(s); County(s); and
Congressional District(s). Include a general location map.
(f) Brief description/summary of the project and description of
resource issues to be addressed as they relate to MRBI priorities and
objectives. Identify the specific natural resource concerns to be
addressed.
(g) Description of planning already completed at the field and
watershed scales that identifies conservation practices/systems needed
to address nutrient concerns.
(h) A list of the approved NRCS FOTG conservation practices,
conservation enhancements, and conservation activity plans which will
be used to address those resource concerns.
(i) Proposed project start and end dates (not to exceed a period of
5 years).
(j) Total budget for the project including the amount of MRBI-CCPI
financial assistance being requested for the project by program by
fiscal year.
(2) Project Natural Resource Objectives and Actions: The proposal
must include the project objectives and the natural resource concerns
that will be addressed.
(a) Identify and provide detail about the natural resource
concern(s) to be addressed and how the proposal objectives will address
those concerns. Objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable,
results-oriented, and include a time for completion.
(b) For each objective, identify the actions to be completed to
achieve the objective and to address the identified natural resource
concern. Specify which actions are to be addressed through the project
using MRBI-CCPI assistance and those being addressed through alternate
non-Federal funding sources or other resources provided.
(3) Detailed Proposal Criteria: Information provided in the
proposal must include:
(a) A description of the partner(s) history of working with
agricultural producers to address resource issues and the conservation
objectives to be achieved.
(b) A detailed description of the watershed area including emphasis
on treatment and metrics at the 12-digit HUC subwatershed(s) within the
designated 8-digit HUC focus area covered by the proposal, conservation
priorities in the area, conservation objectives to be achieved, and the
expected level of participation by producers. Proposals should state
whether a MRBI-CCPI proposal is integrated with a MRBI-WREP or Farm
Service Agency Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), Continuous Sign-Up
CRP (CCRP), Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), or
Farmable Wetlands Program (FWP) proposed or existing project, and
include the name of any MRBI-WREP, CRP, CCRP, CREP, or FWP proposed
project. Higher ranking may be given to integrated proposals.
(c) A description of the partner(s) and the roles,
responsibilities, and capabilities of the partner(s). Proposals that
include resources from partners other than the lead partner must
include a letter or other documentation confirming the commitment of
resources.
(d) A description of the project duration, plan of action, and
project implementation schedule that details when the potential partner
anticipates finishing the project and submitting a final report.
Project proposals cannot exceed 5 years from start to completion.
(e) A description of the resources (financial and technical
assistance) requested from each of the available NRCS programs (EQIP,
WHIP, CSP) and the non-Federal resources provided by the partner(s)
that will be leveraged by the Federal contribution. As determined by
the State Conservationist, a maximum of 10 percent of total financial
assistance funds in a proposal may be designated for edge-of-field
monitoring to address critically unmet monitoring needs in the context
of an overall monitoring and evaluation plan submitted by the partner.
The partner is not required to provide any specific matching of
financial or technical resources toward the project; however, proposals
that include or offer non-Federal resources will be given higher
priority through the evaluation process. Partners need to state clearly
how they intend to leverage Federal funds along with partner resources.
The funding and time contribution by agricultural producers and non-
industrial forest owners to implement agreed-to
[[Page 9384]]
conservation systems in program contracts may not be considered any
part of a match from the potential partner for purposes of MRBI-CCPI.
(f) A description of the plan for monitoring, evaluating, and
reporting on progress made toward achieving the objectives of the
agreement. The MRBI is adopting a three-tiered monitoring and
evaluation approach designed to assess environmental outcomes at the
field, 12-digit, and 8-digit watershed scales. Higher priority will be
given to projects that adopt this three-tiered approach where the
partner can provide resources or services. Higher priority will also be
given to projects that utilize environmental indicators to monitor
water quality and evaluate effects of conservation practices and
activities implemented through the project on a field or edge-of-field
scale as well as at selected downstream monitoring points. A framework
for watershed and edge-of-field monitoring, including environmental
indicators, can be found at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/mrbi.html.
(g) Potential criteria to be used by NRCS to prioritize and rank
MRBI-CCPI producer applications in the project area. Additional
information regarding the process NRCS uses to evaluate and rank
individual producer applications is found in each of the authorized
program regulations. The potential partner should include specific
producer application ranking criteria in the proposal, so that NRCS can
evaluate producer applications based upon the environmental objectives
of the MRBI-CCPI project. Additional guidance and examples of
acceptable ranking criteria may be obtained from the State
Conservationist where the project will be located.
(h) An estimate of the percentage of producers, including
nonindustrial private forest landowners, in the project area that are
expected to participate in the project along with an estimate of the
total number of producers located in the project area. Producer
participation is a requirement for delivery of MRBI-CCPI program
benefits. A statement on how the partner will encourage participation
to increase the likelihood of project success.
(i) A statement describing participation by beginning farmers or
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers, limited resource
farmers or ranchers, and Indian tribes.
(j) A listing and description of the conservation practices,
conservation activity plans, conservation enhancements, and partner
activities to be implemented during the project timeframe and the
general sequence of project implementation. Other activities to address
are those technical assistance efforts undertaken by the partner and
those that the partner requests NRCS to implement using eligible
approved MRBI-CCPI conservation practices, conservation enhancements,
and project financial assistance funding. In this section, list all the
approved MRBI-CCPI conservation practices and enhancements the partner
wishes NRCS to offer to producers through the MRBI-CCPI project. A
national list of the approved MRBI-CCPI core and supporting practices
can be accessed from https://nrcs.usda.gov/programs/mrbi/mrbi.html; each
State may have a slightly modified list. Information about these
approved practices can be found in the Field Office Technical Guide at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/ or https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/standards/. For each conservation practice, estimate the
practice extent (feet, acres, number, etc.) the partner expects
producers to implement each fiscal year during the life of the project
and the amount of financial assistance requested to support
implementation of each practice through producer contracts. Information
on eligible conservation enhancements can be found at the CSP Web site
at: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/new_csp/csp.html. Indicate
whether the project will address regulatory compliance and any other
outcomes that the partner expects to complete during the project
period. Describe any activities that are innovative or include outcome-
based performance measures implemented by the partner.
(k) A description of the amount of funds needed annually for
producer contracts or agreements by eligible program (EQIP, WHIP, and
CSP). This section of the proposal should include the total amount of
financial assistance funds requested for each fiscal year of the
project (for MRBI-CCPI multi-State projects provide the funds/acres by
State) to be made available for producer contracts.
(l) A description of any requested policy, procedure, and technical
adjustments, by program, with explanation of why the adjustment is
needed in order to achieve the objectives of the project.
Ranking Considerations
NRCS will evaluate proposals using a competitive process and will
give a higher priority to proposals that:
Demonstrate the partner's history of working cooperatively
with landowners;
Provide for outreach to, and participation of, beginning
farmers or ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers,
limited resource farmers or ranchers, and Indian tribes within the area
covered by the agreement;
Facilitate the submission of landowner applications;
Integrate both WREP and CCPI within a project area;
Significantly leverage non-Federal financial and technical
resources;
Coordinate with other local, State, or Federal efforts,
including with Farm Service Agency program efforts (e.g., CRP, CCRP,
CREP, FWP) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) funded
watershed efforts (e.g. 319 projects);
Provide for matching financial or technical assistance
funds to assist participants with the implementation of their EQIP and
CSP contracts and WHIP cost-share agreements;
Assist the participants in meeting local, State, and
Federal regulatory requirements;
Demonstrate the partner's financial commitment to provide
for water quality monitoring and evaluation of conservation practices,
enhancements, and activities;
Have a high potential to achieve water quality objectives
through phosphorous (P) or nitrogen (N) nutrient reduction;
Have a high potential to improve wildlife habitat;
For WHIP and EQIP applications, include multiple core and
supporting practices from each practice category (avoiding,
controlling, and trapping) from the State-approved MRBI-CCPI practice
list;
Provide innovation in approved conservation practices,
conservation methods, and delivery including outcome-based performance
measures and methods;
Have a high potential to maintain agricultural
productivity;
Provide evidence of a watershed planning process that:
[cir] Identifies nutrients (N or P) causing water quality problems
and identifies their sources enabling implementation to be prioritized,
[cir] Identifies quantifiable project goals for field-scale
nutrient management and watershed-scale nutrient load reduction,
[cir] Identifies conservation practices and systems to be utilized
to accomplish project goals/objectives,
[cir] Identifies technical assistance and financial assistance
needed,
[cir] Includes an information and education component,
[cir] Lists measurable interim milestones that relate to project
goals, and
[cir] Presents criteria for evaluation and adaptive management;
Convert land from cropping systems to permanent vegetative
practices when
[[Page 9385]]
supported by landowners and agricultural producers as part of overall
agricultural operation;
Adopt a three-tiered monitoring approach whereby the
partner provides resources or services to conduct water quality
monitoring activities and to evaluate the effects of conservation
practices and activities implemented through the project on a field or
edge-of-field scale, as well as at selected downstream monitoring
points;
Complete the application of the conservation practices,
systems, or activities on all of the covered program contracts or cost-
share agreements in less than 5 years;
Have a high percentage of producers involved and working
agricultural or nonindustrial private forest land included in the area
covered by the agreement; and
Deliver high percentages of applied conservation to
address water quality, water conservation, or State, regional, or
national conservation initiatives.
Part B: MRBI-WREP
Section 2206 of the 2008 Act establishes the WREP by amending
section 1237A(h) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3837a(h)).
Under WREP, NRCS enters into agreements with eligible partners to help
enhance conservation outcomes on wetlands and adjacent lands. The
purpose of WREP as part of MRBI is to target and leverage resources to
protect, restore, and enhance wetlands; improve wildlife habitat; and
reduce nutrient loading to achieve water quality objectives through
agreements with eligible partners. Eligible partners include States
(including a political subdivision or agency of a State), nongovernment
organizations, and Indian tribes.
Fund Availability
Effective on the date of this notice, the CCC announces the
availability of $25 million in financial assistance funds for WREP
through the MRBI in FY 2010 to eligible landowners in the designated
focus areas (8-digit HUCs).
WREP is administered under the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) and
is a voluntary program designed to foster coordination with partners
and to encourage non-Federal investment in natural resource
conservation through the use of matching funds and in-kind services.
WREP partners are required to contribute a financial match of at least
5 percent of the acquisition or restoration costs toward the project.
Proposals which include resources provided by additional partners will
be given higher priority consideration in the selection process.
Contributions provided by the partners can be in the form of technical
and financial assistance for the protection, restoration, and
enhancement of the wetland. Partner contributions can also be used for
management and monitoring activities. Additional contributions beyond
the required financial match can be in-kind services or cash.
Eligible Partners
Under WREP, NRCS enters into multi-year agreements with eligible
partners. Eligible partners for WREP include State and local units of
government, Indian tribes, or nongovernmental organizations.
Eligible partners should submit complete proposals addressing the
conservation objectives to be achieved within 12-digit HUC
subwatershed(s) within designated 8-digit HUC focus areas. Proposals
that integrate wetland protection, restoration, and enhancement
activities within a proposed MRBI-CCPI project area will be given
higher priority consideration in the selection process. Wetland
restoration and enhancement actions will be designed to maximize
wildlife habitat values and water quality according to the WRP
regulation, 7 CFR part 1467, and NRCS FOTG standards and
specifications. Proposals must conform to the WRP guidelines for
restoration and management of lands subject to a WRP easement or
contract.
Landowner Applications
For WREP, once a project area has been approved and announced,
eligible landowners may apply for WRP through their local NRCS office.
The land eligibility criteria for WREP are the same as for WRP and are
listed in 7 CFR part 1467.4. NRCS and the partner will assist
landowners in determining whether the application is appropriate for
WREP depending on the wetland protection, restoration, and enhancement
activities that the applicant seeks to install or perform. In FY 2010,
NRCS will make WREP funds available to eligible landowners to enroll
land under a permanent easement; a 30-year easement; or on acreage
owned by Indian tribes, a 30-year contract.
WREP financial and technical assistance is delivered to eligible
landowners in approved project areas through easement acquisition,
conservation program contracts, cooperative agreements, contribution
agreements, or Federal contracts. Restoration may be achieved through
payments to other parties.
Proposal Requirements
For consideration of a proposal submitted through MRBI-WREP, a
potential partner must submit five copies (8.5 x
11 white paper) of the written proposal and one electronic
copy on CD-ROM in MS WORD or PDF. If submitting more than one project
proposal (proposals for multiple 8-digit focus areas), a potential
partner must submit a separate complete document for each project. The
entire project proposal should not exceed 15 pages in length including
maps, reference materials, or related reports.
The basic format for the WREP proposal is a narrative written
response to the questions and information requested in this notice.
There are no forms required or associated with the WREP proposal
process.
(1) Proposal Cover and Summary: The first few pages of the proposal
must include:
(a) Project title.
(b) Project Director/Manager name, telephone, and e-mail address.
(c) Name of lead partner submitting proposal and other
collaborating partners.
(d) Mailing address and telephone numbers for lead partner.
(e) Designated 8-digit focus area and 12-digit HUC subwatershed(s),
wherein the project lies, including; State(s); County(s); and
Congressional District(s). Include a general location map.
(f) Short general description/summary of project.
(g) Potential acres to be enrolled in the project area.
(h) Proposed project start and end dates (not to exceed a period of
5 years).
(i) Total budget for the project including the amount of WREP
financial assistance being requested for the project.
(2) Project Natural Resource Objectives and Actions: The proposal
must address wetland restoration, including water quality concerns, in
12-digit subwatershed(s), located within the 8-digit focus areas, and
the objectives of the project to address those concerns.
(a) Identify and provide detail about the natural resource
concern(s) to be addressed and how the proposal's objectives will
address those concerns. Objectives should be specific, measurable,
achievable, results-oriented, and include a timeframe for completion.
(b) For each objective, identify the actions to be completed to
achieve that objective and address the identified natural resource
concern. Specify which actions are to be addressed through this
[[Page 9386]]
project using WREP assistance, and which are being addressed through
alternate non-Federal funding sources or other resources provided.
(c) Identify the total acres that require wetland protection,
restoration, and enhancement.
(3) Detailed Proposal Criteria: Information provided in the
proposal must include:
(a) A description of the partner(s) history of working with
landowners to address natural resource issues.
(b) A detailed description of the 12-digit subwatershed(s) within
the designated 8-digit focus area covered by the proposal, including a
specific watershed map which indicates the project location. Proposals
should state whether an MRBI-WREP proposal is integrated with an MRBI-
CCPI proposed project, and include the name of the MRBI-CCPI proposed
project.
(c) A description of the partner(s) and the roles,
responsibilities, and capabilities of the partner(s). Proposals which
include resources from partners other than the lead partner must
include a letter or other documentation confirming the commitment of
resources.
(d) A description of the project duration, plan of action, and
project implementation schedule. Project proposals cannot exceed 5
years.
(e) A description of the financial assistance resources that are
requested through the MRBI-WREP, and the non-Federal resources provided
by the partner(s) that will be leveraged by the Federal contribution.
The partner is required to contribute a financial match of at least 5
percent of the acquisition or restoration costs toward the project.
Proposals that include additional non-Federal resources will be given
higher priority consideration in the selection process. The partner
needs to clearly state how they intend to leverage Federal funds along
with partner resources. The funding and time contribution by landowners
to implement agreed-to wetland restoration and enhancement practices
may not be considered any part of a match from the potential partner
for purposes of WREP.
(f) An estimate of the percentage of potential landowners in the
project area that may participate in the project along with an estimate
of the total number of potential landowners located in the project
area. A statement on how the partner will encourage participation to
increase the likelihood of project success.
(g) A statement describing participation by beginning farmers and
ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers, limited resource
farmers or ranchers, and Indian tribes.
(h) A description of the wetland protection, restoration, and
enhancement activities to be implemented during the project timeframe,
and the general sequence of implementation of the project. Activities
may include those efforts undertaken by the partner and those that the
partner requests NRCS to address through financial support.
(i) The amount of funds needed annually for easement acquisition
and wetland restoration and enhancement activities.
(j) A description of how the partner will provide outreach,
especially to beginning farmers or ranchers, socially disadvantaged
farmers and ranchers, limited resource farmers or ranchers, and Indian
tribes.
Ranking Considerations
The appropriate State Conservationist will evaluate proposals using
a competitive process and forward recommended proposals to the Chief.
The Chief will give a higher priority to proposals that:
Demonstrate the partner's history of working cooperatively
with landowners;
Provide for outreach to, and participation of, beginning
farmers or ranchers, socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers,
limited resource farmers or ranchers, and Indian tribes within the area
to be covered by the agreement;
Facilitate the submission of landowner applications;
Significantly leverage non-Federal financial and technical
resources;
Coordinate with other local, State, tribal, or Federal
efforts, including with Farm Service Agency proposed or existing
program efforts (e.g. CRP, Continuous Sign-Up CRP, CREP, FWP, and EPA-
funded watershed efforts (e.g. 319 projects);
Assist the participants in meeting local, State, tribal,
and Federal regulatory requirements;
Provide for monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness
of the restoration activities on water quality;
Have a high potential to achieve water quality objectives
through phosphorous (P) or nitrogen (N) nutrient reduction;
Have a high potential to maximize habitat for migratory
birds and other wetland-dependent wildlife;
Provide innovation in wetland protection, restoration, and
enhancement methods and outcome-based performance measures and methods;
Provide evidence that wetland restoration and enhancement
activities will be completed within 2 years of closing on the easement;
Provide for matching financial or technical assistance
funds to assist landowners with the implementation of the Wetlands
Reserve Plan of Operations and associated contracts; and
Integrate wetland protection, restoration, and enhancement
activities within a proposed MRBI-CCPI project area.
Review of MRBI-CCPI and MRBI-WREP Proposals
The State Conservationist(s) will review the proposals to address:
Potential cooperation or duplication of efforts with other
projects or existing programs;
Adherence to, and consistency with, program regulation
including requirements related to land and producer eligibility and use
of approved NRCS resource concerns and conservation practices,
conservation enhancements, and other program requirements;
Expected benefits for project implementation in their
State(s);
Other issues or concerns the State Conservationist is
aware of that should be considered by the Chief; and
A general recommendation for support or denial of project
approval.
Prior to submission of the proposal, potential partners are
strongly encouraged to consult with the appropriate State
Conservationist(s) during proposal development to obtain guidance as to
appropriate resource concerns to address conservation practices,
wetland restoration, enhancement activities needed, and other details
of the project proposal.
All proposals submitted become the property of NRCS for use in the
administration of the program, may be filed or disposed of by the
agency, and will not be returned to the potential partner. Once
proposals have been submitted to the agency for review and ranking,
there will be no further opportunity to change or re-submit the
proposal document.
Acknowledgement of Submission and Notifications
Partners whose proposals have been selected will receive a letter
of official notification from the Chief. The Chief will make the final
selection for all projects based on the ranking criteria listed above.
Upon notification of selection, the partner should contact the NRCS
State Conservationist listed in the letter to develop the required
partnership agreement and other project implementation requirements.
Partner
[[Page 9387]]
submissions of proposals not selected will be notified by mail.
Withdrawal of Proposals
Partner proposals may be withdrawn by written notice to the Chief
or State Conservationist at any time prior to selection.
Partnership Agreements
NRCS will enter a partnership agreement with a selected partner who
has an approved project as the mechanism for participation in MRBI-CCPI
or MRBI-WREP. At a minimum, the partnership agreement will address:
The role of the partner;
The role of NRCS;
The responsibilities of the partner relating to water
quality monitoring and evaluation if included as part of the proposal.
NRCS reserves the right to negotiate with the partners on refinements
to the monitoring and evaluation plan to address MRBI objectives;
The format and frequency of reports (semi-annual, annual,
and final) that are required as a condition of the agreement;
Plan of work and budget to identify other funding sources
(if applicable) for financial or technical assistance;
The specified project schedule; and
Other requirements deemed necessary by NRCS to further the
purposes of the MRBI-CCPI or MRBI-WREP project.
Once a project is selected, NRCS will evaluate a project's progress
throughout the project lifecycle. NRCS will enter into a project
agreement for the necessary funds agreed to for FY 2010. In proposed
projects years beyond FY 2010, NRCS may obligate additional funds
without further competition based on an assessment of the project's
effectiveness in achieving MRBI objectives and the availability of
funds.
Waiver Authority
To assist in the implementation of WREP or CCPI projects, the Chief
may waive the applicability of the Adjusted Gross Income Limitation on
a case-by-case basis in accordance with policy and processes
promulgated in 7 CFR part 1400. Such waiver requests must be submitted
in writing from the program applicant, addressed to the Chief, and
submitted through the local NRCS district conservationist.
Signed this 23rd day of February 2010, in Washington, DC.
Dave White,
Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation and Chief, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
Attachment
Natural Resources Conservation Service State Conservationists--MRBI States
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Name Address Phone E-mail address
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas........................ Michael E. Sullivan.................. Federal Building, (501) 301-3100 michael.sullivan@ar.usda.gov.
Room 3416, 700
West Capitol
Avenue, Little
Rock, Arkansas
72201-3228.
Illinois........................ William J. Gradle.................... 2118 W. Park (217) 353-6601 bill.gradle@il.usda.gov.
Court, Champaign,
Illinois 61821.
Indiana......................... Jane E. Hardisty..................... 6013 Lakeside (317) 290-3200 jane.hardisty@inn.usda.gov.
Boulevard,
Indianapolis,
Indiana 46278-
2933.
Iowa............................ Richard Sims......................... 693 Federal (515) 284-6655 richard.sims@ia.usda.gov.
Building, 210
Walnut Street,
Suite 693, Des
Moines, Iowa
50309-2180.
Kentucky........................ Tom Perrin........................... 771 Corporate (859) 224-7350 tom.perrin@ky.usda.gov.
Drive, Suite 110,
Lexington,
Kentucky 40503-
5479.
Louisiana....................... Kevin D. Norton...................... 3737 Government (318) 473-7751 kevin.norton@la.usda.gov.
Street,
Alexandria,
Louisiana 71302.
Minnesota....................... Jennifer Heglund..................... 375 Jackson (651) 602-7900 jennifer.heglund@mn.usda.gov.
Street, Suite
600, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55101-
1854.
Mississippi..................... Homer Wilkes......................... Suite 1321, (601) 965-5205 homer.wilkes@ms.usda.gov.
Federal Building,
100 West Capitol
Street, Jackson,
Mississippi 39269-
1399.
Missouri........................ J.R. Flores.......................... Parkade Center, (573) 876-0901 Jr.flores@mo.usda.gov.
Suite 250, 601
Business Loop 70
West, Columbia,
Missouri 65203-
2546.
Ohio............................ Terry J. Cosby....................... 200 North High (614) 255-2472 terry.cosby@oh.usda.gov.
Street, Room 522,
Columbus, Ohio
43215-2478.
Tennessee....................... Kevin Brown.......................... 675 U.S. (615) 277-2531 kevin.brown@tn.usda.gov.
Courthouse, 801
Broadway,
Nashville,
Tennessee 37203-
3878.
Wisconsin....................... Patricia Leavenworth................. 8030 Excelsior (608) 662-4422 pat.leavenworth@wi.usda.gov.
Drive, Suite 200,
Madison,
Wisconsin 53717.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9388]]
[FR Doc. 2010-4275 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P