Virginia Electric and Power Company; North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, 9449-9451 [2010-4269]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
challenge an NRC staff determination
granting access to SUNSI whose release
would harm that party’s interest
independent of the proceeding. Such a
challenge must be filed with the Chief
Administrative Judge within 5 days of
the notification by the NRC staff of its
grant of access.
If challenges to the NRC staff
determinations are filed, these
procedures give way to the normal
process for litigating disputes
concerning access to information. The
availability of interlocutory review by
the Commission of orders ruling on
such NRC staff determinations (whether
granting or denying access) is governed
by 10 CFR 2.311.3
I. The Commission expects that the
NRC staff and presiding officers (and
any other reviewing officers) will
consider and resolve requests for access
to SUNSI, and motions for protective
orders, in a timely fashion in order to
minimize any unnecessary delays in
identifying those petitioners who have
standing and who have propounded
contentions meeting the specificity and
basis requirements in 10 CFR Part 2.
Attachment 1 to this Order summarizes
9449
the general target schedule for
processing and resolving requests under
these procedures.
It is so ordered.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of February 2010.
For the Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
ATTACHMENT 1—General Target
Schedule for Processing and Resolving
Requests for Access to Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information in This Proceeding
Day
Event/activity
0 ........................
Publication of Federal Register notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, including order with instructions for access requests.
Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information:
supporting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order
for the potential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding.
Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) Demonstration of standing; (ii) all contentions whose formulation
does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 requestor/petitioner reply).
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requestor of the staff’s determination whether the request for access
provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs
any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing
(preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents).
If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for requestor/petitioner to file a motion seeking a ruling
to reverse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief
Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline for any
party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to
file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access.
Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s).
(Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and
file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure
Agreement for SUNSI.
If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access
to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a
final adverse determination by the NRC staff.
Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order.
Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days
remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as
established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later
deadline.
(Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI.
(Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers.
Decision on contention admission.
10 ......................
60 ......................
20 ......................
25 ......................
30 ......................
40 ......................
A .......................
A + 3 .................
A + 28 ...............
A + 53 ...............
A + 60 ...............
>A + 60 .............
[FR Doc. 2010–3988 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–338 and 50–339; NRC–
2010–0026
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Virginia Electric and Power Company;
North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1
and 2
1.0
Background
The Virginia Electric and Power
Company, (the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–4
and NPF–7, which authorize operation
3 Requestors should note that the filing
requirements of the NRC’s E–Filing Rule (72 FR
49139; August 28, 2007) apply to appeals of NRC
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
staff determinations (because they must be served
on a presiding officer or the Commission, as
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the North Anna Power Station, Unit
Nos. 1 and 2 (NAPS). The licenses
provide, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of two
pressurized water reactors located in
Louisa County, Virginia.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73, ‘‘Physical
applicable), but not to the initial SUNSI request
submitted to the NRC staff under these procedures.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
9450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
protection of plants and materials,’’
Section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities
in nuclear power reactors against
radiological sabotage,’’ published March
27, 2009, effective May 26, 2009, with
a full implementation date of March 31,
2010, requires licensees to protect, with
high assurance, against radiological
sabotage by designing and
implementing comprehensive site
security plans. The amendments to 10
CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009, establish and update generically
applicable security requirements similar
to those previously imposed by
Commission orders issued after the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
and implemented by licensees. In
addition, the amendments to 10 CFR
73.55 include additional requirements
to further enhance site security based
upon insights gained from
implementation of the post September
11, 2001, security orders. It is from a
certain requirement of these new
requirements that NAPS now seeks an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical
security requirements established by
this recent rulemaking have already
been or will be implemented by the
licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated November 23, 2009,
the licensee requested an exemption in
accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ‘‘Specific
exemptions.’’ Certain portions of the
licensee’s November 23, 2009, letter
contain proprietary and safeguards
information and, accordingly, are not
available to the public. The licensee has
requested an exemption from the March
31, 2010, compliance date stating that it
must perform the required upgrades to
the NAPS security system before all of
the Section 73.55 requirements can be
met. Specifically, the request is to
extend the compliance date for a certain
requirement from the current March 31,
2010, deadline to August 31, 2010.
Being granted this exemption for this
item would allow the licensee to
complete the modifications designed to
update aging equipment and incorporate
state-of-the-art technology to meet the
noted regulatory requirement.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule
Exemptions from the
March 31, 2010, Full Implementation
Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By
March 31, 2010, each nuclear power
reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR
Part 50, shall implement the
requirements of this section through its
Commission-approved Physical Security
Plan, Training and Qualification Plan,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber
Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant
to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may,
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR Part 73 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, and will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
The NRC staff has determined that
granting of the licensee’s proposed
exemption would not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the Commission’s
regulations. Therefore, NRC approval of
the licensee’s exemption request is
authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor
security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed
that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The
Commission directed a change from 180
days to approximately 1 year for
licensees to fully implement the new
requirements. This change was
incorporated into the final rule. Based
on the above, it is clear that the
Commission wanted to provide a
reasonable timeframe for licensees to
achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the
Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct sitespecific analyses to determine what
changes were necessary to implement
the rule’s requirements, and that these
changes could be accomplished through
a variety of licensing mechanisms,
including exemptions. Since issuance of
the final rule, the Commission has
rejected generic industry requests to
extend the rule’s compliance date for all
operating nuclear power plants, but
noted that the Commission’s regulations
provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for
relief from the compliance date
(Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R.
W. Borchardt, NRC, to M. S. Fertel,
Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee’s
request for an exemption is therefore
consistent with the approach set forth
by the Commission and discussed in the
June 4, 2009, letter.
NAPS Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided adequate
information in its November 23, 2009,
letter requesting an exemption. It
describes a comprehensive plan for
implementing security system upgrades
and provides a timeline for achieving
full compliance with the new
regulation. The site-specific information
provided within the exemption request
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is relative to the requirements from
which the licensee requested exemption
and demonstrates the need for
modification to meet the requirement.
Notwithstanding the schedular
exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee will continue
to be in compliance with all other
applicable physical security
requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC
approved physical security program. By
August 31, 2010, NAPS will be in full
compliance with all the regulatory
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued
on March 27, 2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule
Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee’s
submittal and concludes that the
licensee has provided adequate
justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to
August 31, 2010, with regard to a
specific requirement of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law
and will not endanger life or property or
the common defense and security, and
is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants the requested exemption.
The NRC staff has determined that the
long-term benefits that will be realized
when the NAPS security system
upgrades are complete justifies
exceeding the March 31, 2010, full
compliance date and is consistent with
the scope of the modifications in the
case of this particular licensee. The
security measures NAPS needs
additional time to implement are new
requirements imposed by March 27,
2009 amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and
are in addition to those required by the
security orders issued in response to the
events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, it is concluded that the
licensee’s actions are in the best interest
of protecting the public health and
safety through the security changes that
will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee’s request and the
NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an
exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation deadline for the item
specified in the licensee’s November 23,
2009, letter, the licensee is required to
be in full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55
by August 31, 2010. In achieving
compliance, the licensee is reminded
that it is responsible for determining the
appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e.,
10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 2, 2010 / Notices
incorporation of all necessary changes
to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 4591,
published January 28, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day
of February 2010.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Allen G. Howe,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–4269 Filed 3–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2010–0002]
Sunshine Act Meetings
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
DATES: Weeks of March 1, 8, 15, 22, 29,
April 5, 2010.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
Week of March 1, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Uranium
Recovery (Public Meeting).
(Contact: Dominick Orlando, 301–
415–6749.)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov,
Week of March 8, 2010—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 8, 2010.
Week of April 5, 2010—Tentative
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
9 a.m. Periodic Briefing on New
Reactor Issues—Design
Certifications (Public Meeting).
(Contact: Amy Snyder, 301–415–
6822.)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
*The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651.
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify Angela
Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor
Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301–
492–2230, TDD: 301–415–2100, or by email at angela.bolduc@nrc.gov.
Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an e-mail to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: February 25, 2010.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–4384 Filed 2–26–10; 4:15 pm]
Week of March 15, 2010—Tentative
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Week of March 29, 2010—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 29, 2010.
1:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
on Grid Reliability (Public
Meeting). (Contact: Kenn Miller,
301–415–3152.)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No.: 70–7016; NRC–2009–0157]
Week of March 22, 2010—Tentative
Notice of Receipt and Availability of
Environmental Report Supplement 2
for the Proposed GE-Hitachi Global
Laser Enrichment Laser-Based
Uranium Enrichment Facility
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 22, 2010.
On January 13, 2009, GE–Hitachi
Global Laser Enrichment, LLC (GLE)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Mar 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9451
was granted an exemption to file its
environmental report in advance of its
license application. GLE submitted its
Environmental Report (ER) on January
30, 2009 (ML090910573), that proposes
the construction, operation, and
decommissioning of a laser-based
uranium enrichment facility. The
proposed facility would be located
approximately six miles north of the
City of Wilmington in New Hanover
County, North Carolina.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
published a Notice of Intent to Prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on the proposed action and the
opportunity for public comment on the
scope of issues to be considered in the
EIS (74 FR 16237) (April 9, 2009). The
comment period was extended to allow
members of the public to review the
publicly available portions of the
license application (July 24, 2009), (74
FR 36781). The license application was
submitted on June 26, 2009,
(ML091871003).
On May 8, 2009, the NRC granted an
exemption to authorize GLE to conduct
site preparation and pre-construction
activities on the Wilmington site. GLE
submitted Supplement 1 to its ER on
July 13, 2009, GLE Environmental
Report Supplement 1—Early
Construction (ML092100577).
Supplement 1 distinguishes between the
environmental impacts of preconstruction activities covered by the
exemption and NRC authorized
construction activities which will not be
undertaken unless a license is granted.
On November 13, 2009, GLE submitted
Supplement 2 to its ER, GLE
Environmental Report Supplement 2—
Revised Roadway and Entrance
(ML093240135). Supplement 2 provides
information describing the
environmental impacts associated with
revising the location of the entrance and
roadway into the Wilmington site.
On January 13, 2010, the NRC issued
an order that announced the receipt of
an application from GLE for a license to
possess and use source, byproduct, and
special nuclear material and to enrich
natural uranium to a maximum of 8
percent U–235 by a laser-based
enrichment process. This order also
included the Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of License; Notice of Hearing
and Commission Order; and Order
Imposing Procedures for Access to
Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards
Information and Safeguards Information
for Contention Preparation (75 FR 1819)
(January 13, 2010).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general or technical information
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9449-9451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4269]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339; NRC-2010-0026
Virginia Electric and Power Company; North Anna Power Station,
Unit Nos. 1 and 2
1.0 Background
The Virginia Electric and Power Company, (the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7, which
authorize operation of the North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
(NAPS). The licenses provide, among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of two pressurized water reactors located in
Louisa County, Virginia.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 73,
``Physical
[[Page 9450]]
protection of plants and materials,'' Section 73.55, ``Requirements for
physical protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors
against radiological sabotage,'' published March 27, 2009, effective
May 26, 2009, with a full implementation date of March 31, 2010,
requires licensees to protect, with high assurance, against
radiological sabotage by designing and implementing comprehensive site
security plans. The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27,
2009, establish and update generically applicable security requirements
similar to those previously imposed by Commission orders issued after
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and implemented by
licensees. In addition, the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 include
additional requirements to further enhance site security based upon
insights gained from implementation of the post September 11, 2001,
security orders. It is from a certain requirement of these new
requirements that NAPS now seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
implementation date. All other physical security requirements
established by this recent rulemaking have already been or will be
implemented by the licensee by March 31, 2010.
By letter dated November 23, 2009, the licensee requested an
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.''
Certain portions of the licensee's November 23, 2009, letter contain
proprietary and safeguards information and, accordingly, are not
available to the public. The licensee has requested an exemption from
the March 31, 2010, compliance date stating that it must perform the
required upgrades to the NAPS security system before all of the Section
73.55 requirements can be met. Specifically, the request is to extend
the compliance date for a certain requirement from the current March
31, 2010, deadline to August 31, 2010. Being granted this exemption for
this item would allow the licensee to complete the modifications
designed to update aging equipment and incorporate state-of-the-art
technology to meet the noted regulatory requirement.
3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions from the
March 31, 2010, Full Implementation Date
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ``By March 31, 2010, each nuclear
power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR Part 50, shall implement
the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved
Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards
Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively
hereafter as `security plans.' '' Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its
own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part
73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger
life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise
in the public interest.
The NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensee's
proposed exemption would not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, or the Commission's regulations. Therefore,
NRC approval of the licensee's exemption request is authorized by law.
In the draft final power reactor security rule provided to the
Commission, the NRC staff proposed that the requirements of the new
regulation be met within 180 days. The Commission directed a change
from 180 days to approximately 1 year for licensees to fully implement
the new requirements. This change was incorporated into the final rule.
Based on the above, it is clear that the Commission wanted to provide a
reasonable timeframe for licensees to achieve full compliance.
As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that
licensees would have to conduct site-specific analyses to determine
what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and
that these changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing
mechanisms, including exemptions. Since issuance of the final rule, the
Commission has rejected generic industry requests to extend the rule's
compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that
the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual
licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance
date (Reference: June 4, 2009, letter from R. W. Borchardt, NRC, to M.
S. Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute). The licensee's request for an
exemption is therefore consistent with the approach set forth by the
Commission and discussed in the June 4, 2009, letter.
NAPS Schedule Exemption Request
The licensee provided adequate information in its November 23,
2009, letter requesting an exemption. It describes a comprehensive plan
for implementing security system upgrades and provides a timeline for
achieving full compliance with the new regulation. The site-specific
information provided within the exemption request is relative to the
requirements from which the licensee requested exemption and
demonstrates the need for modification to meet the requirement.
Notwithstanding the schedular exemptions for these limited
requirements, the licensee will continue to be in compliance with all
other applicable physical security requirements as described in 10 CFR
73.55 and reflected in its current NRC approved physical security
program. By August 31, 2010, NAPS will be in full compliance with all
the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27,
2009.
4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request
The staff has reviewed the licensee's submittal and concludes that
the licensee has provided adequate justification for its request for an
extension of the compliance date to August 31, 2010, with regard to a
specific requirement of 10 CFR 73.55.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' an exemption from the March 31, 2010,
compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested
exemption.
The NRC staff has determined that the long-term benefits that will
be realized when the NAPS security system upgrades are complete
justifies exceeding the March 31, 2010, full compliance date and is
consistent with the scope of the modifications in the case of this
particular licensee. The security measures NAPS needs additional time
to implement are new requirements imposed by March 27, 2009 amendments
to 10 CFR 73.55, and are in addition to those required by the security
orders issued in response to the events of September 11, 2001.
Therefore, it is concluded that the licensee's actions are in the best
interest of protecting the public health and safety through the
security changes that will result from granting this exemption.
As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to
grant an exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation deadline for
the item specified in the licensee's November 23, 2009, letter, the
licensee is required to be in full compliance with 10 CFR 73.55 by
August 31, 2010. In achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded that
it is responsible for determining the appropriate licensing mechanism
(i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for
[[Page 9451]]
incorporation of all necessary changes to its security plans.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ``Finding of no significant impact,'' the
Commission has previously determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 4591, published January 28, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of February 2010.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Allen G. Howe,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-4269 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P