Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; FIRMAGON, 9227-9228 [2010-4159]
Download as PDF
9227
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
donors. Section 1270.33(f) requires
records to be retained regarding the
determination of the suitability of the
donors and such records required under
§ 1270.21. Section 1270.33(h) requires
all records to be retained at least 10
years beyond the date of transplantation
if known, distribution, disposition, or
expiration of the tissue, whichever is
the latest. Section 1270.35(a) through (d)
requires specific records to be
maintained to document the following:
(1) The results and interpretation of all
required infectious disease tests, (2)
information on the identity and relevant
medical records of the donor, (3) the
receipt and/or distribution of human
tissue, and (4) the destruction or other
disposition of human tissue.
Respondents to this collection of
information are manufacturers of human
tissue intended for transplantation.
Based on information from the Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s
(CBER’s) database system, FDA
estimates that there are approximately
257 tissue establishments of which 145
are conventional tissue banks and 112
are eye tissue banks. Based on
information provided by industry, there
are an estimated total of 1,959,270
conventional tissue products and 82,741
eye tissue products recovered per year
with an average of 25 percent of the
tissue discarded due to unsuitability for
transplant. In addition, there are an
estimated 57,275 donors of conventional
tissue and 54,115 donors of eye tissue
each year.
Accredited members of the American
Association of Tissue Banks (AATB)
and Eye Bank Association of America
(EBAA) adhere to standards of those
organizations that are comparable to the
recordkeeping requirements in part
1270. Based on information provided by
CBER’s database system, 90 percent of
the conventional tissue banks are
members of AATB (145 x 90% = 130),
and 77 percent of eye tissue banks are
members of EBAA (112 x 77% = 86).
Therefore, recordkeeping by these 216
establishments (130 + 86 = 216) is
excluded from the burden estimates as
usual and customary business activities
(5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2)). The recordkeeping
burden, thus, is estimated for the
remaining 41 establishments, which is
16 percent of all establishments (257 216 = 41, or 41/257 = 16%).
FDA assumes that all current tissue
establishments have developed written
procedures in compliance with part
1270. Therefore, their information
collection burden is for the general
review and update of written
procedures estimated to take an annual
average of 24 hours, and for the
recording and justifying of any
deviations from the written procedures
for § 1270.31(a) and (b), estimated to
take an annual average of 1 hour. The
information collection burden for
maintaining records concurrently with
the performance of each significant
screening and testing step and for
retaining records for 10 years under
§ 1270.33(a), (f), and (h), include
documenting the results and
interpretation of all required infectious
disease tests and results and the identity
and relevant medical records of the
donor required under § 1270.35(a) and
(b). Therefore, the burden under these
provisions is calculated together in table
1 of this document. The recordkeeping
estimates for the number of total annual
records and hours per record are based
on information provided by industry
and FDA experience.
FDA estimates the burden of this
information collection as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1
21 CFR Section
No. of
Recordkeepers
Annual Frequency
per Recordkeeping
Total Annual
Records
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
1270.31(a), (b), (c), and (d)2
41
1
41
24
984
1270.31(a) and (b)3
41
2
82
1
82
1270.33(a), (f), and (h) and
1270.35(a) and (b)
41
8,404
344,564
1
344,564
1270.35(c)
41
15,938
653,458
1
653,458
1270.35(d)
41
1,992
81,672
1
81,672
Total
1 There
1,080,760
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
and update of SOPs.
of deviations from SOPs.
2 Review
3 Documentation
Dated: February 23, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–4066 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–E–0206]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; FIRMAGON
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FIRMAGON and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
9228
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product FIRMAGON
(degarelix acetate). FIRMAGON is
indicated for treatment of patients with
advanced prostate cancer. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for FIRMAGON (U.S. Patent
No. 5,925,730) from Ferring BV, and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated September
29, 2009, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
FIRMAGON represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the Patent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
FIRMAGON is 2,695 days. Of this time,
2,394 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 301 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: August 10,
2001. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new drug application became effective
was on August 10, 2001.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: February 28, 2008.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA)
22–201 was submitted on February 28,
2008.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 24, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–201 was approved on December 24,
2008.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,498 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by April 30, 2010.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
August 30, 2010. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments and petitions may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: February 9, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–4159 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0075]
Draft Guidance for Industry on NonInferiority Clinical Trials; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘Non-Inferiority
Clinical Trials.’’ This draft guidance
provides sponsors and review staff in
the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER) and the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER) with the agency’s interpretation
of the underlying principles involved in
the use of non-inferiority (NI) study
designs to provide evidence of the
effectiveness of a drug or therapeutic
biologic product. The draft guidance
offers advice on when NI studies can be
interpretable, how to choose the NI
margin, and how to analyze the results.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
written or electronic comments on the
draft guidance by June 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, or to the
Office of Communication, Outreach and
Development, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite
200N, Rockville, MD 20852–1448. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. Submit written comments on
the draft guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9227-9228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4159]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-E-0206]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; FIRMAGON
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for FIRMAGON and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 9228]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of
Regulatory Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product FIRMAGON
(degarelix acetate). FIRMAGON is indicated for treatment of patients
with advanced prostate cancer. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
FIRMAGON (U.S. Patent No. 5,925,730) from Ferring BV, and the Patent
and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
September 29, 2009, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that
this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and
that the approval of FIRMAGON represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
FIRMAGON is 2,695 days. Of this time, 2,394 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 301 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
August 10, 2001. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date
the investigational new drug application became effective was on August
10, 2001.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: February 28,
2008. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) 22-201 was submitted on February 28, 2008.
3. The date the application was approved: December 24, 2008. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-201 was approved on
December 24, 2008.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,498 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by April 30, 2010. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by August 30,
2010. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document.
Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: February 9, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-4159 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S