Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Rulemaking Regarding 700 MHz Band Mobile Equipment Design and Procurement Practices, 9210-9211 [2010-4140]
Download as PDF
9210
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the Docket without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address is automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official
public docket, and made available in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–4156 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
February 22, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission has received Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the following public
information collection(s) pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). An agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number,
and no person is required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Comments concerning the
accuracy of the burden estimate(s) and
any suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the person listed
in the ‘‘For Further Information Contact’’
section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Stelzig on (202) 418–0942 or e-mail at
Tim.Stelzig@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1131.
OMB Approval Date: 12/03/2009.
Expiration Date: 12/31/2012.
Title: Implementation of the NET 911
Improvement ACT of 2008: Location
Information from Owners and
Controllers of 911 and E911
Capabilities.
Form Number: N/A.
Estimated Annual Burden: 60
responses; 0.0833 hours (5 minutes)
hours per response; 5 hours total per
year.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in the New and Emerging
Technologies 911 Improvement Act of
2008 (NET 911 Act), Public Law 110–
283, Stat. 2620 (2008) (to be codified at
47 CFR Section 615a–1), and section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
222 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
To implement section 222 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, the Commission’s rules
impose a general duty on carriers to
protect the privacy of customer
proprietary network information and
carrier proprietary information from
unauthorized disclosure. See 47 CFR
64.2001 et seq. In the Order, the
Commission additionally has clarified
that the Commission’s rules
contemplate that incumbent LECs and
other owners or controllers of 911 or
E911 infrastructure will acquire
information regarding interconnected
VoIP providers and their customers for
use in the provision of emergency
services. We fully expect that these
entities will use the information only for
the provision of E911 services. To be
clear, no entity may use customer
information obtained as a result of the
provision of 911 or E911 services for
marketing purposes.
Needs and Uses: In a Report and
Order, FCC 08–249, WC Docket No. 08–
171, the FCC requires an owner or
controller of a 911 or enhanced 911
(E911) capability to make that capability
available to a requesting interconnected
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
provider in certain circumstances. This
requirement involves the collection and
disclosure to emergency services
personnel of customers’ location
information. In a previous action, the
Commission required interconnected
VoIP providers to collect certain
location information from their
customers and disclose it to the entities
that owner or control an Automatic
Location Information (ALI) database.
That OMB-approved requirement is
under OMB Control Number 3060–1085.
All the relevant costs of the entities that
own or control an ALI database were
previously described in 3060–1085. The
Commission has calculated the
paperwork burdens of this present item
in such a way as to prevent double
counting for OMB’s inventory.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–4068 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 6712–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[RM No. 11592; DA 10–278]
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Seeks Comment on Petition for
Rulemaking Regarding 700 MHz Band
Mobile Equipment Design and
Procurement Practices
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau seeks
comment on a petition for rulemaking
asking the Commission to require that
all mobile units be capable of operating
over all frequencies in the 700 MHz
Band.
DATES: Interested parties may file
comments on or before March 31, 2010,
and reply comments on or before
April 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed
using (1) the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
Federal Government’s eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See
Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal
Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
• Effective December 28, 2009, all
hand-delivered or messenger-delivered
paper filings for the Commission’s
Secretary must be delivered to FCC
Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room
TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building. The filing hours
are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
• People With Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (Voice), 202–
418–0432 (TTY).
All filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Marlene H.
Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
Documents in RM No. 11592, including
a copy of the petition, are available for
public inspection and copying during
business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The documents
may also be purchased from BCPI,
telephone (202) 488–5300, facsimile
(202) 488–5563, TTY (202) 488–5562,
e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com.
This matter shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. See 47 CFR 1.1200, 1.1206.
Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must contain summaries
of the substance of the presentations
and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one- or twosentence description of the views and
arguments presented generally is
required. See 47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other
rules pertaining to oral and written ex
parte presentations in permit-butdisclose proceedings are set forth in
section 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Won
Kim, Spectrum and Competition Policy
Division, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, at (202) 418–1368.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Public
Notice in RM No. 11592 and DA 10–
278, released on February 18, 2010. On
September 29, 2009, an alliance
comprised of four Lower 700 MHz Band
A Block licensees (Petitioners) filed a
petition for rulemaking, asking the
Commission to ‘‘assure that consumers
will have access to all paired 700 MHz
spectrum that the Commission licenses,
to act so that the entire 700 MHz band
will develop in a competitive fashion,
and to adopt rules that prohibit
restrictive equipment arrangements that
are contrary to the public interest.’’ 1
1 700 MHz Block A Good Faith Purchaser
Alliance Petition for Rulemaking Regarding the
Need for 700 MHz Mobile Equipment to be Capable
of Operating on All Paired Commercial 700 MHz
Frequency Blocks, filed Sept. 29, 2009 (Petition), at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Specifically, the Petitioners ask the
Commission to require that all mobile
units for the 700 MHz band be capable
of operating over all frequencies in the
band.2 The Petitioners further request
‘‘an immediate freeze on the
authorization of mobile equipment that
is not capable of operation on all paired
commercial 700 MHz frequencies.’’ 3
The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau seeks comment on the Petition.4
AT&T and Verizon Wireless have
indicated that they are pursuing 700
MHz Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile
devices that operate over the 700 MHz
spectrum blocks associated with some
or all of their own respective 700 MHz
band licenses but that do not include
the Lower 700 MHz Band A Block (A
Block).5 The Petitioners assert that these
‘‘equipment design and procurement
practices contravene the public
interest,’’ arguing that, if the equipment
offered by these large carriers does not
operate over A Block, mobile 700 MHz
‘‘equipment needed by [A Block]
licensees in smaller volumes will likely
be available only later in time and at
considerably higher price points.’’ 6 The
Petitioners also argue that such
practices ‘‘are unjustly discriminatory
and anticompetitive’’ in violation of
Sections 201(b) and 202(a) of the
Communications Act (Act), and that
they are in conflict with other
provisions of the Act, including the
universal service goals of Section
254(b)(3) and the license application
review criteria of Section 307(b).7
The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau seeks comment on relevant
technical, legal, economic, and policy
issues involving the Petitioners’ request
that the Commission commence a
rulemaking proceeding. The
1. The Alliance is a ‘‘joint venture’’ consisting of
Cellular South Licenses, Inc.; Cavalier Wireless,
LLC; Continuum 700, LLC; and King Street
Wireless, L.P., each of which is currently the
licensee of Lower 700 MHz Band A Block spectrum.
Id.
2 Petition at iii, 12.
3 Petition at 1–2.
4 The Bureau notes that several parties have
already filed comments in various proceedings that
discuss either the Petition or substantially similar
issues. See, e.g., Cellular South Comments, WT
Docket No. 09–66 (filed Sept. 30, 2009) at 8–15;
Verizon Wireless Reply Comments, WT Docket No.
09–66 (filed Oct. 22, 2009), at 85–92; AT&T, Inc.
Reply Comments, WT Docket No. 09–66 (filed Oct.
22, 2009) (AT&T Reply Comments), at 70–72;
Verizon Wireless Ex parte, WT Docket No. 09–66;
GN Docket No. 09–157 (filed Dec. 18, 2009)
(Verizon Ex parte); Qualcomm Ex parte, WT Docket
No. 09–66; GN Docket No. 09–157 (filed Jan. 25,
2010); Motorola Comments, RM–11592 (filed
Feb. 12, 2010).
5 See AT&T Reply Comments at 72; Verizon
Wireless Ex parte at 7.
6 Petition at 2, 4.
7 Petition at 7–9.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9211
Commission notes, for instance, that
devices capable of operating in the A
Block will be using spectrum adjacent to
the full-power DTV broadcasting
operations on Channel 51, and to the
Lower 700 MHz Band E Block, which
may be used for higher-powered mobile
services under Commission rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Ruth Milkman,
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010–4140 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Announcement of Board
Approval Under Delegated Authority
and Submission to OMB; Correction
This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc.
2010–3578) published on pages 8355
through 8362 of the issue for February
24, 2010.
Under the Federal Reserve System
heading, the entry for Agency
Information Collection Activities:
Announcement of Board Approval
Under Delegated Authority and
Submission to OMB, is revised to read
as follows:
SUMMARY: Background. Notice is hereby
given of the final approval of proposed
information collections by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board) under OMB delegated
authority, as per 5 CFR 1320.16 (OMB
Regulations on Controlling Paperwork
Burdens on the Public). Board-approved
collections of information are
incorporated into the official OMB
inventory of currently approved
collections of information. Copies of the
Paperwork Reduction Act Submission,
supporting statements and approved
collection of information instruments
are placed into OMB’s public docket
files. The Federal Reserve may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or
after October 1, 1995, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer—Michelle Shore—Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202–
452–3829)
OMB Desk Officer—Shagufta
Ahmed—Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9210-9211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4140]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[RM No. 11592; DA 10-278]
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for
Rulemaking Regarding 700 MHz Band Mobile Equipment Design and
Procurement Practices
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on a
petition for rulemaking asking the Commission to require that all
mobile units be capable of operating over all frequencies in the 700
MHz Band.
DATES: Interested parties may file comments on or before March 31,
2010, and reply comments on or before April 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed using (1) the Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must
be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building. The filing hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
[[Page 9211]]
People With Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(Voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).
All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Documents in RM
No. 11592, including a copy of the petition, are available for public
inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI,
telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562,
e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com.
This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47
CFR 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain
summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a
listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence
description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.
See 47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in
section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Won Kim, Spectrum and Competition
Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-1368.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Public
Notice in RM No. 11592 and DA 10-278, released on February 18, 2010. On
September 29, 2009, an alliance comprised of four Lower 700 MHz Band A
Block licensees (Petitioners) filed a petition for rulemaking, asking
the Commission to ``assure that consumers will have access to all
paired 700 MHz spectrum that the Commission licenses, to act so that
the entire 700 MHz band will develop in a competitive fashion, and to
adopt rules that prohibit restrictive equipment arrangements that are
contrary to the public interest.'' \1\ Specifically, the Petitioners
ask the Commission to require that all mobile units for the 700 MHz
band be capable of operating over all frequencies in the band.\2\ The
Petitioners further request ``an immediate freeze on the authorization
of mobile equipment that is not capable of operation on all paired
commercial 700 MHz frequencies.'' \3\ The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau seeks comment on the Petition.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 700 MHz Block A Good Faith Purchaser Alliance Petition for
Rulemaking Regarding the Need for 700 MHz Mobile Equipment to be
Capable of Operating on All Paired Commercial 700 MHz Frequency
Blocks, filed Sept. 29, 2009 (Petition), at 1. The Alliance is a
``joint venture'' consisting of Cellular South Licenses, Inc.;
Cavalier Wireless, LLC; Continuum 700, LLC; and King Street
Wireless, L.P., each of which is currently the licensee of Lower 700
MHz Band A Block spectrum. Id.
\2\ Petition at iii, 12.
\3\ Petition at 1-2.
\4\ The Bureau notes that several parties have already filed
comments in various proceedings that discuss either the Petition or
substantially similar issues. See, e.g., Cellular South Comments, WT
Docket No. 09-66 (filed Sept. 30, 2009) at 8-15; Verizon Wireless
Reply Comments, WT Docket No. 09-66 (filed Oct. 22, 2009), at 85-92;
AT&T, Inc. Reply Comments, WT Docket No. 09-66 (filed Oct. 22, 2009)
(AT&T Reply Comments), at 70-72; Verizon Wireless Ex parte, WT
Docket No. 09-66; GN Docket No. 09-157 (filed Dec. 18, 2009)
(Verizon Ex parte); Qualcomm Ex parte, WT Docket No. 09-66; GN
Docket No. 09-157 (filed Jan. 25, 2010); Motorola Comments, RM-11592
(filed Feb. 12, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT&T and Verizon Wireless have indicated that they are pursuing 700
MHz Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile devices that operate over the 700
MHz spectrum blocks associated with some or all of their own respective
700 MHz band licenses but that do not include the Lower 700 MHz Band A
Block (A Block).\5\ The Petitioners assert that these ``equipment
design and procurement practices contravene the public interest,''
arguing that, if the equipment offered by these large carriers does not
operate over A Block, mobile 700 MHz ``equipment needed by [A Block]
licensees in smaller volumes will likely be available only later in
time and at considerably higher price points.'' \6\ The Petitioners
also argue that such practices ``are unjustly discriminatory and
anticompetitive'' in violation of Sections 201(b) and 202(a) of the
Communications Act (Act), and that they are in conflict with other
provisions of the Act, including the universal service goals of Section
254(b)(3) and the license application review criteria of Section
307(b).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See AT&T Reply Comments at 72; Verizon Wireless Ex parte at
7.
\6\ Petition at 2, 4.
\7\ Petition at 7-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on relevant
technical, legal, economic, and policy issues involving the
Petitioners' request that the Commission commence a rulemaking
proceeding. The Commission notes, for instance, that devices capable of
operating in the A Block will be using spectrum adjacent to the full-
power DTV broadcasting operations on Channel 51, and to the Lower 700
MHz Band E Block, which may be used for higher-powered mobile services
under Commission rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Ruth Milkman,
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-4140 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P