Letter From Secretary of Energy Accepting Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) Recommendation 2009-2, 9196-9197 [2010-4128]
Download as PDF
9196
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
which the grantee provides a
subcontract or subgrant, and the result
of that collaboration as evidenced by
improved delivery of technical
assistance and training and improved
collaboration between entities funded
under the AT Act at the national and
State level or other relevant and
identifiable improvements; and
(4) A description of how the technical
assistance and training needs of entities
funded under the AT Act and entities
not funded under the AT Act are
identified and met, and the result of
meeting those needs as evidenced by
resolution of State-specific and national
issues or other relevant and identifiable
outcomes.
VII. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact:
Robert Groenendaal, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5025, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2800. Telephone: (202) 245–7393
or by e-mail:
robert.groenendaal@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–
877–8339.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: February 24, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–4176 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Letter From Secretary of Energy
Accepting Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board (Board) Recommendation
2009–2
Department of Energy.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) is making available the February
2, 2010, Secretary’s letter to the Board
accepting the Board’s recommendation
2009–2 regarding seismic safety at the
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Plutonium Facility.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy,
HS–1.1, 1000 Independence Ave, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is
making this letter available for public
information and solicits comments from
the public. Comments may be sent to
the address above. The text of the
document is below. It may also be
viewed at: https://www.hss.energy.gov/
deprep/default.asp.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23,
2010.
Mark B. Whitaker,
Departmental Representative to the Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
February 2, 2010.
The Honorable John E. Mansfield, Vice
Chairman, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana
Avenue, NW., Suite 700,
Washington, DC 20004.
Dear Mr. Vice Chairman: The
Department of Energy (DOE)
acknowledges receipt of Defense
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board)
Recommendation 2009–2, Los Alamos
National Laboratory Plutonium Facility
Seismic Safety, issued on October 26,
2009, and I accept the recommendation.
In December 2008, the National
Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) Los Alamos Site Office (LASO)
approved a new Documented Safety
Analysis (DSA) for the Plutonium
Facility at Los Alamos National
Laboratory (LANL), the first major
upgrade to the Plutonium Facility’s
Safety Basis since 1996. The DSA
conservatively describes potentially
high mitigated consequences to the
maximally exposed off-site individual
(i.e., the public) from a first-floor fire
following a seismic event,
approximately two orders of magnitude
higher than our evaluation guideline for
selecting safety class controls.
Approval of the DSA included
recognition of weaknesses in the
facility’s control set and the need to
upgrade a number of safety systems in
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
order to meet DOE nuclear safety
policies. As a result, Los Alamos
National Security (LANS) has initiated a
number of improvements to address
safety issues identified in the DSA,
including transitioning to an active
confinement ventilation strategy.
LANS recently submitted to LASO an
update of the facility’s DSA that
includes revised seismic accident
scenarios to more accurately, but
conservatively, evaluate the
consequences of such scenarios. The
DSA annual update, to be reviewed and
approved by LASO, includes about a
factor of 15 reduction from the previous
DSA of the mitigated consequences to
the maximally exposed off-site
individual from a post-seismic fire. This
proposed reduction is accomplished by
establishing stricter limits to the overall
material at risk allowed in the facility
and by defining specific material
quantity limits for various forms of
material such as liquid, metal, and
oxide and for heat-source plutonium.
However, additional upgrades will be
needed in order to meet DOE nuclear
safety policies.
A significant number of actions have
been completed recently or are planned
in the near future that improve the
safety posture of the facility. For
example, in the near term, NNSA will
incentivize LANS to accomplish the
following in FY 10:
• Install an automatic seismic
shutdown capability for non-vital
laboratory room electrical loads that
provides an engineered control to
reduce laboratory room electrical
ignition sources;
• Develop conceptual designs for
potential seismic upgrades to key active
confinement ventilation subsystems and
to the fire suppression system;
• Robustly package or otherwise
disposition greater than 250 kilograms
of plutonium-equivalent material;
• Reduce first floor material at risk
limit by 40 percent; and
• Complete safety class encapsulation
of the existing inventory of heat-source
plutonium currently stored in Russian
Product Containers (RPCs) that will
subsequently be stored in the vault
water baths.
NNSA has also provided additional
funding to LANS for FY 10 to support
the repackaging and disposition of
material, risk reduction activities, and
new generation container development.
Also, for FY 10, LASO and LANS have
developed performance-based
incentives of about $1.3M for materials
repackaging and disposition, updated
seismic analyses, and safety upgrades to
the Plutonium Facility. These actions in
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices
FY 10 build upon actions taken by
LANS in FY 09 and early FY 10,
including the following:
• Removed nearly 11 tons of
combustible material from the facility,
primarily first-floor laboratory rooms;
• Repackaged 60 existing RPCs with
pressure safety concerns into new safety
class containers;
• Replaced 195 high efficiency
particulate air (HEPA) filters with
500°F-rated HEPA filters; and
• Developed a hydraulic model of the
Fire Suppression System that identified
weaknesses that are being addressed
and will be used to inform decisionmaking for making this system safety
class.
A more comprehensive summary of key
actions is provided in the enclosure to
this letter.
As noted above, the changes to the
DSA currently under review would
reduce the potential consequences at the
site boundary due to a post-seismic fire
event by a factor of 15. Approving
updates to the DSA and Technical
Safety Requirements is the binding
mechanism by which DOE directs
changes to the nuclear safety posture of
its facilities. DOE is expediting its
review of the updated DSA to achieve
its implementation at the earliest
feasible date.
I have assigned Mr. James J.
McConnell, Acting Assistant Deputy
Administrator for Nuclear Safety and
Operations, Office of Defense Programs,
NNSA, to be the Department’s
responsible manager for developing the
Implementation Plan. He can be reached
at (202) 586–4379.
Sincerely,
Steven Chu
[FR Doc. 2010–4128 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP10–64–000]
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;
Notice of Application
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
February 19, 2010.
Take notice that on February 9, 2010,
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street,
Houston, Texas 77002, filed in the
above referenced docket an application
pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the
Commission’s regulations, requesting
authorization to abandon in place an
inactive supply lateral designed as Line
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
No. 527A–1300 and associated
appurtenances located in Federal waters
offshore Louisiana. Tennessee states
that the subject facilities incurred
extensive damage during Hurricane
Gustav and have since been inactive, all
as more fully set forth in the application
which is on file with the Commission
and open to public inspection. The
filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TTY, (202)
502–8659.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to Thomas
G. Joyce, Manager, Certificates,
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 1001
Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002,
by telephone at (713) 420–3299, by
facsimile at (713) 420–1605, or by e-mail
at tom.joyce@elpaso.com; or Kathy
Cash, Principal Analyst, Rates and
Regulatory Affairs, Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company, 1001 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas 77002, by
telephone at (713) 420–3290, by
facsimile at (713) 420–1605, or by e-mail
at kathy.cash@elpaso.com.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and
to every other party. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9197
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: March 1, 2010.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–4090 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings No. 1
February 18, 2010.
Take notice that the Commission has
received the following Natural Gas
Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
Docket Numbers: RP10–383–000.
Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Co.
Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Co submits Ninth Revised
Sheet No. 1 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff,
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1.
Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
Accession Number: 20100217–0223.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on Monday, March 1, 2010.
Docket Numbers: RP10–384–000.
Applicants: Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC.
Description: Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC submits petition for
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9196-9197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4128]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Letter From Secretary of Energy Accepting Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board (Board) Recommendation 2009-2
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is making available the
February 2, 2010, Secretary's letter to the Board accepting the Board's
recommendation 2009-2 regarding seismic safety at the Los Alamos
National Laboratory Plutonium Facility.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy, HS-1.1, 1000 Independence Ave,
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is making this letter available for
public information and solicits comments from the public. Comments may
be sent to the address above. The text of the document is below. It may
also be viewed at: https://www.hss.energy.gov/deprep/default.asp.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23, 2010.
Mark B. Whitaker,
Departmental Representative to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board.
February 2, 2010.
The Honorable John E. Mansfield, Vice Chairman, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700,
Washington, DC 20004.
Dear Mr. Vice Chairman: The Department of Energy (DOE) acknowledges
receipt of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board)
Recommendation 2009-2, Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium
Facility Seismic Safety, issued on October 26, 2009, and I accept the
recommendation.
In December 2008, the National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) Los Alamos Site Office (LASO) approved a new Documented Safety
Analysis (DSA) for the Plutonium Facility at Los Alamos National
Laboratory (LANL), the first major upgrade to the Plutonium Facility's
Safety Basis since 1996. The DSA conservatively describes potentially
high mitigated consequences to the maximally exposed off-site
individual (i.e., the public) from a first-floor fire following a
seismic event, approximately two orders of magnitude higher than our
evaluation guideline for selecting safety class controls.
Approval of the DSA included recognition of weaknesses in the
facility's control set and the need to upgrade a number of safety
systems in order to meet DOE nuclear safety policies. As a result, Los
Alamos National Security (LANS) has initiated a number of improvements
to address safety issues identified in the DSA, including transitioning
to an active confinement ventilation strategy.
LANS recently submitted to LASO an update of the facility's DSA
that includes revised seismic accident scenarios to more accurately,
but conservatively, evaluate the consequences of such scenarios. The
DSA annual update, to be reviewed and approved by LASO, includes about
a factor of 15 reduction from the previous DSA of the mitigated
consequences to the maximally exposed off-site individual from a post-
seismic fire. This proposed reduction is accomplished by establishing
stricter limits to the overall material at risk allowed in the facility
and by defining specific material quantity limits for various forms of
material such as liquid, metal, and oxide and for heat-source
plutonium. However, additional upgrades will be needed in order to meet
DOE nuclear safety policies.
A significant number of actions have been completed recently or are
planned in the near future that improve the safety posture of the
facility. For example, in the near term, NNSA will incentivize LANS to
accomplish the following in FY 10:
Install an automatic seismic shutdown capability for non-
vital laboratory room electrical loads that provides an engineered
control to reduce laboratory room electrical ignition sources;
Develop conceptual designs for potential seismic upgrades
to key active confinement ventilation subsystems and to the fire
suppression system;
Robustly package or otherwise disposition greater than 250
kilograms of plutonium-equivalent material;
Reduce first floor material at risk limit by 40 percent;
and
Complete safety class encapsulation of the existing
inventory of heat-source plutonium currently stored in Russian Product
Containers (RPCs) that will subsequently be stored in the vault water
baths.
NNSA has also provided additional funding to LANS for FY 10 to support
the repackaging and disposition of material, risk reduction activities,
and new generation container development. Also, for FY 10, LASO and
LANS have developed performance-based incentives of about $1.3M for
materials repackaging and disposition, updated seismic analyses, and
safety upgrades to the Plutonium Facility. These actions in
[[Page 9197]]
FY 10 build upon actions taken by LANS in FY 09 and early FY 10,
including the following:
Removed nearly 11 tons of combustible material from the
facility, primarily first-floor laboratory rooms;
Repackaged 60 existing RPCs with pressure safety concerns
into new safety class containers;
Replaced 195 high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)
filters with 500[deg]F-rated HEPA filters; and
Developed a hydraulic model of the Fire Suppression System
that identified weaknesses that are being addressed and will be used to
inform decision-making for making this system safety class.
A more comprehensive summary of key actions is provided in the
enclosure to this letter.
As noted above, the changes to the DSA currently under review would
reduce the potential consequences at the site boundary due to a post-
seismic fire event by a factor of 15. Approving updates to the DSA and
Technical Safety Requirements is the binding mechanism by which DOE
directs changes to the nuclear safety posture of its facilities. DOE is
expediting its review of the updated DSA to achieve its implementation
at the earliest feasible date.
I have assigned Mr. James J. McConnell, Acting Assistant Deputy
Administrator for Nuclear Safety and Operations, Office of Defense
Programs, NNSA, to be the Department's responsible manager for
developing the Implementation Plan. He can be reached at (202) 586-
4379.
Sincerely,
Steven Chu
[FR Doc. 2010-4128 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P