Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP), 9142-9146 [2010-3993]
Download as PDF
9142
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1, 31 and 301
[REG–139255–08]
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–4122 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
[FR Doc. 2010–4125 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
hearing were due on February 10, 2010.
The notice of proposed rulemaking and
notice of public hearing instructed those
interested in testifying at the public
hearing to submit a request to speak,
and an outline of the topics to be
addressed. As of Tuesday, February 23,
2010, no one has requested to speak.
Therefore, the public hearing scheduled
for March 10, 2010, is cancelled.
[FR Doc. 2010–4121 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
beginning at 1 pm. in the auditorium of
the IRS New Carrollton Federal
Building, 5000 Ellin Road, Lanham,
Maryland 20706. The building has
controlled access restrictions, attendants
will not be admitted beyond the
entrance before 12:30 p.m. The IRS will
prepare an agenda showing the
scheduling of the speakers testifying,
and make copies available free of charge
at the hearing.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel.
as the text of § 1.6654–2T(f) published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register].
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
RIN 1545–BI51
Information Reporting for Payments
Made in Settlement of Payment Card
and Third Party Network Transactions;
Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Rescheduling of notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document reschedules a
notice of public hearing on proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing
relating to information reporting
requirements, information reporting
penalties, and backup withholding
requirements for payment card and
third party network transactions.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for Wednesday, February 10,
2010 at 10 a.m. is rescheduled for
Monday, March 15, 2010 at 1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing is being
held in the IRS New Carrollton Federal
Building, 5000 Ellin Road, Lanham,
Maryland 20706.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Johnson of the Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration) at (202)
622–7180 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on Tuesday, November
24, 2009 (74 FR 61294), announced that
a public hearing on proposed
regulations relating to information
reporting requirements, information
reporting penalties, and backup
withholding requirements for payment
card and third party network
transactions, was to be held on
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 10
a.m. Due to inclement weather, the date
and location of the public hearing has
been changed. The public hearing is
scheduled for Monday, March 15, 2010
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:32 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Office of the Secretary
26 CFR Part 301
32 CFR Part 240
[REG–111833–99]
[DOD–2008–OS–0050]
RIN 1545–AX46
RIN 0790–AI28
Regulations Under I.R.C. Section 7430
Relating to Awards of Administrative
Costs and Attorneys Fees; Hearing
Cancellation
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public
hearing on proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document cancels a
public hearing on proposed regulation
relating to awards of administrative
costs and attorneys fees under section
7430 to conform to amendments made
in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 and
the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998.
DATES: The public hearing, originally
scheduled for March 10, 2010 at 10 a.m.
is cancelled.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regina Johnson of the Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration) at (202)
622–7180 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking and notice of
public hearing that appeared in the
Federal Register on Wednesday,
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61589)
announced that a public hearing was
scheduled for March 10, 2010 at 10 a.m.
in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. The subject of
the public hearing is under section 7430
of the Internal Revenue Code.
The public comment period for these
regulations expired on February 8, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Sfmt 4702
Information Assurance Scholarship
Program (IASP)
AGENCY: Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer
(ASD(NII)/DoD CIO), Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule proposes
to add a part to DoD regulations to
implement policy, responsibilities and
procedures for executing an information
assurance scholarship and grant
program, known as the DoD Information
Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP).
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or RIN
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Smith, (703) 699–0122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
240 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
240 does not contain a Federal mandate
that may result in expenditure by State,
local and Tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
240 is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
Section 240.7 of this proposed rule
contains information collection
requirements. DoD has submitted the
following proposal to OMB under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of DoD, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the estimate of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:32 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Information Assurance
Scholarship Program (IASP).
Type of Request: New.
Number of Respondents: 422.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 422.
Average Burden per Response: 4.16
hours.
Annual Burden Hours: 1,755 hours.
Needs and Uses: The National
Security Agency (NSA) is the Executive
Administrator of the Information
Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP),
serving on behalf of the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer. Those
who wish to participate in the IASP
Recruitment program must complete
and submit an application package
through their college or university to
NSA. Centers of Academic Excellence in
Information Assurance Education (CAE/
IAEs) interested in applying for
capacity-building grants must complete
and submit a written proposal, and all
colleges and universities subsequently
receiving grants must provide
documentation on how the grant
funding was utilized. In addition, IASP
participants and their faculty advisors
(Principal Investigators) are required to
complete annual program assessment
documents. Without this written
documentation, the DoD has no means
of judging the quality of applicants to
the program or collecting information
regarding program performance.
Affected Public: ‘‘Individuals or
households,’’ specifically college
students at institutions designated as
CAE/IAEs who are interested in, and
qualified to, apply for a scholarship;
‘‘Not-for-profit institutions,’’ specifically
CAE/IAEs interested in submitting
proposals for capacity-building grants,
and faculty advisors (Principal
Investigators).
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of
Management and Budget, DoD Desk
Officer, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
with a copy to the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer
(ASD(NII)/DoD CIO), 1225 South Clark
St., Suite 910, Arlington, VA, 22202.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9143
Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
You may also submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by the following method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer
(ASD(NII)/DoD CIO), 1225 South Clark
St., Suite 910, Arlington, VA 22202; or
contact Ms. Sandra Smith at (703) 699–
0122.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been certified that 32 CFR part
240 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive
Order 13132. This rule does not have
substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the
National Government and the States; or
(3) The distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 240
Scholarships.
Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 240 is
added to read as follows:
PART 240—INFORMATION
ASSURANCE SCHOLARSHIP
PROGRAM (IASP)
Sec.
240.1
240.2
240.3
240.4
240.5
240.6
240.7
Purpose.
Applicability.
Definitions.
Policy.
Responsibilities.
Retention program.
Recruitment program.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2200, 10 U.S.C. 7045.
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
9144
§ 240.1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Purpose.
This part implements policy,
responsibilities and procedures for
executing the DoD Information
Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP).
§ 240.2
Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, the Military
Departments, the Office of the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint
Staff, the Combatant Commands, the
Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense, the Defense
Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and
all other organizational entities within
the Department of Defense (hereafter
referred to collectively as the ‘‘DoD
Components’’). The term ‘‘Military
Services,’’ as used herein, refers to the
Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the
Marine Corps.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 240.3
Definitions.
The following terms apply to this
part:
Center of Academic Excellence (CAE).
A collective term that refers to both a
National Center of Academic Excellence
in Information Assurance Education
(CAE/IAE) and a National Center of
Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Research (CAE–R).
CAE/IAE. A National CAE/IAE is an
institution of higher education which
has met established criteria for
Information Assurance Education and
has been jointly designated by the
Department of Homeland Security and
the National Security Agency (NSA) as
a CAE/IAE.
CAE–R. A National CAE–R is an
institution of higher education which
has met established criteria for
Information Assurance Research and
has been jointly designated by the
Department of Homeland Security and
the NSA as a CAE–R.
DoD IASP Executive Administrator.
The NSA functions as the Executive
Administrator for the IASP and is
charged with the day-to-day
administration of the program.
IASP Partner University. A National
CAE which has joined in academic
partnership with the Information
Resources Management College (IRMC)
of the National Defense University to
award masters’ and/or doctoral degrees
through DoD’s IASP.
Information Assurance (IA). For the
purpose of this part, the term ‘‘IA’’
includes computer security, network
security and other relevant IT related to
information assurance pursuant to
Section 2200 of title 10, United States
Code.
Information Technology (IT). For the
purpose of this part, the term ‘‘IT’’ refers
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:32 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
to any equipment or interconnected
system or subsystem of equipment that
is used in the automatic acquisition,
storage, manipulation, management,
movement, control, display, switching,
interchange, transmission, or reception
of data or information. ‘‘IT’’ includes
computers, ancillary equipment,
software, firmware, and similar
procedures, services (including support
services), and related resources.
Institution of Higher Education. For
the purpose of this part, an ‘‘institution
of higher education’’ refers to an
educational institution in any State that:
(1) Admits as regular students only
individuals who possess a certificate of
graduation from a school providing
secondary education, or the recognized
equivalent of such a certificate;
(2) Is legally authorized to provide a
program of education beyond secondary
education;
(3) Provides an educational program
that awards bachelor’s degrees, or
provides no less than a 2-year program
that is acceptable for full credit toward
a degree;
(4) Is a public or other nonprofit
institution; and
(5) Is accredited by a nationally
recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an
institution that has been granted
preaccreditation status by such an
agency or association that has been
recognized by the Secretary for the
granting of preaccreditation status, and
the Secretary has determined that there
is satisfactory assurance that the
institution will meet the accreditation
standards of such an agency or
association within a reasonable time.
Principal Investigator. Principal
Investigators are the primary points of
contact at each National CAE/IAE. They
are responsible for publicizing the IASP
to potential recruitment students and
working with students during the
application process. Principal
Investigators also serve as the primary
contact for recruitment students and
retention students who have transferred
from the IRMC to a Partner University.
Recruitment Students or Recruitment
Program. Applies to the portion of the
IASP available to qualified non-DoD
students currently enrolled at a
designated National CAE.
Retention Students or Retention
Program. Applies to the portion of the
IASP available to full-time, active duty
Military Services personnel and civilian
employees of the DoD Components.
§ 240.4
Policy.
It is DoD policy that:
(a) The Department of Defense shall
recruit, develop, and retain a highly
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
skilled cadre of professionals to support
the critical IA and information
technology (IT) management, technical,
digital and multimedia forensics, cyber
investigation, and infrastructure
protection functions required for a
secure network-centric environment.
(b) The IASP shall be used to attract
new entrants to the DoD IA workforce
and to retain current IA/IT personnel
necessary to support the DoD’s diverse
warfighting, business, intelligence, and
enterprise information infrastructure
requirements.
(c) Information Assurance disciplines
for the scholarship program include, but
are not limited to: biometrics, business
management or administration,
computer crime investigations,
computer engineering, computer
programming, computer science,
computer systems analysis, cyber
operations, database administration,
data management, digital and
multimedia forensics, electrical
engineering, electronics engineering,
information security (assurance),
mathematics, network management,
software engineering, and other similar
disciplines as approved by the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Networks and
Information Integration)/DoD Chief
Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD
CIO). All academic disciplines shall
include a concentration in IA.
(d) Subject to availability of funds, the
Department of Defense may provide
grants to institutions of higher learning
for faculty, curriculum, and
infrastructure development and
academic research to support the DoD’s
IA critical areas of interest.
§ 240.5
Responsibilities.
(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/
Department of Defense Chief
Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO)
shall:
(1) Establish overall policy and
guidance to conduct and administer the
DoD IASP pursuant to Deputy Secretary
of Defense Memorandum, ‘‘Delegation of
Authority and Assignment of
Responsibility under Section 922 of the
Floyd D. Spence National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001,’’
October 30, 2000.
(2) Develop annual budget
recommendation to administer the DoD
IASP and provide academic
scholarships and grants.
(3) Oversee program administration
and execution by the Director, NSA.
(4) Establish and chair the DoD IASP
Steering Committee to oversee key
program actions, which include:
(i) Student eligibility criteria.
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Grant and capacity building
selection criteria for awards to CAEs.
(iii) Final approval for the allocation
of individual IASP scholarships and
grants.
(iv) Communications and marketing
plans.
(v) IASP metrics and analysis of
performance results, including student
and CAE/IAE feedback.
(b) The Director, NSA, shall:
(1) Serve as the DoD IASP Executive
Administrator to:
(i) Implement the IASP and publish in
writing all of the criteria, procedures
and standards required for program
implementation to encourage the
recruitment and retention of personnel
who have critical IA and IT skills.
Responsibilities include:
(A) Implementing the scholarship
application and selection procedures for
recruitment and retention students.
(B) Establishing procedures for
recruiting students to meet service
obligations through employment with a
DoD Component upon graduation from
their academic program.
(C) Ensuring that all students’
academic eligibility is maintained,
service obligations are completed, and
that reimbursement obligations for
program disenrollment are fulfilled.
(D) Establishing procedures for
National CAE/IAEs and employing DoD
Components to report on students’
progress.
(E) Maintaining appropriate
accounting for all IASP funding
disbursements.
(ii) Make grants, subject to availability
of funds, on behalf of the DoD CIO to
institutions of higher education to
support the establishment,
improvement, and administration of IA
education programs pursuant to
Sections 2200 and 7045 of title 10,
United States Code.
(A) Develop and implement the
annual solicitation for proposals for
IASP grants.
(B) Coordinate the review process for
grant proposals.
(C) Distribute grant funding and
maintain appropriate accounting.
(D) Establish annual reporting
procedures for grant recipients to detail
the results from their grant
implementation.
(2) Provide representation to the DoD
IASP Steering Committee and provide
briefings and reports, as required, to
effect proper oversight by the DoD CIO
and the IASP Steering Committee.
(3) Maintain databases to support the
analysis of IASP performance results.
(c) The Information Resources
Management College (IRMC) of the
National Defense University, under the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:32 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
authority, direction and control of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
shall:
(1) Establish IASP Partner University
agreements with National CAE/IAEs to
provide master’s and doctoral degree
opportunities to current, former, and
future students enrolled at the IRMC,
who are awarded retention scholarships.
(2) Maintain records of IASP student
enrollments and graduates, and provide
data to the DoD IASP Executive
Administrator.
(3) Serve as the liaison between IRMC
retention students, their follow-on IASP
Partner University, and the DoD IASP
Executive Administrator.
(4) Provide academic representation
to the DoD IASP Steering Committee
and provide briefings and reports as
required on the IASP retention program.
(d) The Heads of the DoD Components
shall:
(1) Determine the requirement for
IASP usage as a vehicle to recruit and
retain IA personnel to their
organization.
(2) Identify the Office of Primary
Responsibility for administering the
IASP within the DoD Component.
(3) Establish DoD Component-specific
nomination, selection, and postacademic assignment criteria for IASP
retention students.
(i) Nominated personnel shall be high
performing employees who are rated at
the higher levels of the applicable
performance appraisal system and
demonstrate sustained quality
performance with the potential for
increased responsibilities. All
individuals must be U.S. citizens and be
able to obtain a security clearance.
(ii) Nominations must fulfill specific
personnel development requirements
for both the individual nominee and the
nominating organization.
(iii) Salaries of retention scholarship
recipients shall be paid by the
nominating DoD Component. When
deemed necessary, DoD Components are
responsible for personnel backfill while
recipients are in school.
(iv) Payback assignments of graduated
students shall provide relevant, followon utilization of academic credentials in
accordance with DoD Component
mission requirements.
(v) Retention students shall fulfill
post-academic service obligations
pursuant to Sections 2200 and 7045 of
title 10, United States Code. Members of
the Military Services shall serve on
active duty while fulfilling designated
DoD Component service obligations.
DoD civilian employees shall sign a
continued service agreement that
complies with section 2200 of title 10,
United States Code, prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9145
commencement of their education, to
continue service within the Department
of Defense upon conclusion of their
education, for a period equal to three
times the length of the education period.
The period of obligated service is in
addition to any other period for which
the recipient is obligated to serve on
active duty or in the civil service, as the
case may be. Individuals who fail to
complete the degree program
satisfactorily, or to fulfill the service
commitment, shall be required repay
program costs, where applicable. Head
of Components are responsible to ensure
enforcement of these agreements.
(4) Determine annual billet
requirements for recruitment students
(the number of non-DoD IASP scholars
who can be placed in full-time
employment positions with the DoD
Component upon graduation). Specific
responsibilities for DoD Components
who identify billet requirements for
recruitment students include:
(i) Assessing DoD Component skill
requirements to determine skill gaps
and providing the annual recruitment
student requirement to the DoD IASP
Executive Administrator.
(ii) Participating in the selection
process for recruitment students.
(iii) Coordinating and processing
security clearances for selected
recruitment scholarship recipients.
(iv) Allocating billets for an
internship period (if applicable).
(v) Assigning mentors to recruitment
students.
(vi) Determining post-academic billet
assignments for recruitment students
prior to the end of the students’
academic program.
(5) Participate in the evaluation
processes to assess and recommend
improvements to the IASP.
§ 240.6
Retention program.
(a) The IASP retention program is
open to qualified DoD civilian
employees and members of the Military
Services. Military officers and DoD
civilian employees may apply for a
master’s or doctoral degree program;
enlisted personnel may apply for a
master’s program.
(b) There are three DoD academic
institutions participating in the IASP:
the Air Force Institute of Technology
(AFIT) at Wright-Patterson Air Force
Base in Dayton, Ohio; the Information
Resources Management College (IRMC)
of the National Defense University at
Fort McNair in Washington, DC in
conjunction with over 25 Partner
Universities; and the Naval Postgraduate
School (NPS) in Monterey, California.
Students at AFIT and NPS attend fulltime programs. IRMC participants may
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
9146
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
attend the IRMC component of the IASP
either full or part-time and select a
follow-on IASP Partner University
through which they complete their
degree requirements either full or parttime. There are no part-time doctoral
programs. All candidates must meet the
eligibility requirements for their
selected program, which are outlined in
IASP Academic Programs for Retention
Students.
(1) Military officers and DoD civilian
employees may apply to attend any one
of the three DoD academic institutions.
(2) Enlisted personnel may attend
AFIT or the NPS, which is authorized to
enroll enlisted IASP participants
pursuant to Sections 2200 and 7045 of
title 10, United States Code.
(c) Students must select a degree
program in one of the academic
disciplines listed in § 240.4(c).
(d) Scholarship funding for the AFIT,
the IRMC, and the IASP Partner
Universities, and the NPS includes
tuition costs, selected fees, books, and
pre-approved, limited temporary duty
(TDY) costs. Other TDY and/or
permanent change of station costs must
be paid by the nominating DoD
Component. Retention students will
continue to receive their military pay or
civilian salary from their DoD
Component throughout their course of
study.
(e) DoD Component nominations are
due by January 31st each year. The
student nomination process is outlined
in IASP Nomination Process for
Retention Students.
(f) IASP participants are obligated to
remain in good standing in their degree
programs, to continue in service as
civilian employees or members of the
Military Services, and where applicable,
to repay program costs for failure to
complete the degree program
satisfactorily, or to fulfill the service
commitment pursuant to Sections 2200
and 7045 of title 10, DoD policy, and the
policies of the respective DoD
Component.
(g) Members of the Military Services
shall meet DoD Component service
obligations. DoD civilian employees
shall sign a continued service agreement
that complies with Reference (a), prior
to commencement of their education to
continue in service with the Department
of Defense upon conclusion of their
education, for a period equal to three
times the length of the education period.
§ 240.7
Recruitment program.
(a) Annually, in November, NSA (the
DoD IASP Executive Administrator)
announces a solicitation for proposal
from non-DoD National CAE/IAEs
interested in participating in DoD’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:32 Feb 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
IASP. Graduate students and rising
junior or senior undergraduates
accepted at or enrolled in one of the
non-DoD institutions designated as
CAE/IAEs apply for full scholarships to
complete a bachelor’s, master’s, or a
doctoral degree, or graduate (postbaccalaureate) certificate program in one
of the relevant disciplines defined in
§ 240.4(c). Student application
requirements are included in the
solicitation proposal released by NSA.
(b) DoD Component recruitment
student requirements are due to the DoD
IASP Executive Administrator each year
by January 31st.
(c) The student selection process
occurs annually in April. The selection
process is outlined in IASP Nomination
Process for Recruitment Students.
(d) Recruitment students are provided
scholarships, covering the full cost of
tuition and selected books and fees.
Students are also provided a stipend to
cover room and board expenses.
(e) Recruitment students may be
required to complete a student
internship, depending on the length of
their individual scholarship. DoD
Components typically use the authority
granted in 5 CFR 213.3102(r), to arrange
the internship.
(f) All recruitment students incur a
service commitment which commences
after the award of the IASP authorized
degree on a date to be determined by the
relevant DoD Component. The obligated
service in DoD shall be as a civilian
employee of the Department or as an
active duty enlisted member or officer
in one of the Military Services.
(1) Individuals selecting employment
in the civil service shall incur a service
obligation of one year of service to the
Department upon graduation for each
year or partial year of scholarship they
receive, in addition to an internship, if
applicable.
(2) Individuals enlisting or accepting
a commission to serve on active duty in
one of the Military Services shall incur
a service obligation of a minimum of 4
years on active duty in that Service
upon graduation. The Military Services
may establish a service obligation longer
than 4 years, depending on the
occupational specialty and type of
enlistment or commissioning program
selected.
(g) Individuals who fail to complete
the degree program satisfactorily or to
fulfill the service commitment upon
graduation shall be required to
reimburse the United States, in whole or
in part, the cost of the financial
(scholarship) assistance provided to
them.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010–3993 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0964; FRL–9116–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois;
NOX Budget Trading Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the Illinois State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that would
terminate the provisions of the Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX) Budget Trading Program
that apply to electric generating units.
EPA is no longer operating the NOX
Budget Trading Program as a
compliance option under the NOX SIP
Call. These sources are now subject to
provisions in a newer set of approved
Illinois rules that address EPA’s Clean
Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). For these
reasons, the sunset of the NOX Budget
Trading Program for these sources
merely deactivates duplicative rule
language.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 31, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R05–OAR–2009–0964 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: damico.genevieve@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 385–5501.
4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Acting
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico,
Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9142-9146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3993]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 240
[DOD-2008-OS-0050]
RIN 0790-AI28
Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP)
AGENCY: Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks and Information
Integration)/DoD Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO),
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule proposes to add a part to DoD regulations
to implement policy, responsibilities and procedures for executing an
information assurance scholarship and grant program, known as the DoD
Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP).
DATES: Comments must be received by April 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
[[Page 9143]]
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Smith, (703) 699-0122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 240 does not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy; a section of the
economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public
health or safety; or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 240 does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local and
Tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 240 is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
Section 240.7 of this proposed rule contains information collection
requirements. DoD has submitted the following proposal to OMB under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
DoD, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b)
the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the information collection on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP).
Type of Request: New.
Number of Respondents: 422.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 422.
Average Burden per Response: 4.16 hours.
Annual Burden Hours: 1,755 hours.
Needs and Uses: The National Security Agency (NSA) is the Executive
Administrator of the Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP),
serving on behalf of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Networks and Information Integration)/DoD Chief Information Officer.
Those who wish to participate in the IASP Recruitment program must
complete and submit an application package through their college or
university to NSA. Centers of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education (CAE/IAEs) interested in applying for capacity-
building grants must complete and submit a written proposal, and all
colleges and universities subsequently receiving grants must provide
documentation on how the grant funding was utilized. In addition, IASP
participants and their faculty advisors (Principal Investigators) are
required to complete annual program assessment documents. Without this
written documentation, the DoD has no means of judging the quality of
applicants to the program or collecting information regarding program
performance.
Affected Public: ``Individuals or households,'' specifically
college students at institutions designated as CAE/IAEs who are
interested in, and qualified to, apply for a scholarship; ``Not-for-
profit institutions,'' specifically CAE/IAEs interested in submitting
proposals for capacity-building grants, and faculty advisors (Principal
Investigators).
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of
Management and Budget, DoD Desk Officer, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, with a copy to the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO), 1225 South Clark St.,
Suite 910, Arlington, VA, 22202. Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but comments to OMB will be most
useful if received by OMB within 30 days after the date of this notice.
You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by the following method:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Networks and Information Integration)/DoD Chief Information
Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO), 1225 South Clark St., Suite 910, Arlington,
VA 22202; or contact Ms. Sandra Smith at (703) 699-0122.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been certified that 32 CFR part 240 does not have federalism
implications, as set forth in Executive Order 13132. This rule does not
have substantial direct effects on:
(1) The States;
(2) The relationship between the National Government and the
States; or
(3) The distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of Government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 240
Scholarships.
Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 240 is added to read as follows:
PART 240--INFORMATION ASSURANCE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM (IASP)
Sec.
240.1 Purpose.
240.2 Applicability.
240.3 Definitions.
240.4 Policy.
240.5 Responsibilities.
240.6 Retention program.
240.7 Recruitment program.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2200, 10 U.S.C. 7045.
[[Page 9144]]
Sec. 240.1 Purpose.
This part implements policy, responsibilities and procedures for
executing the DoD Information Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP).
Sec. 240.2 Applicability.
This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the
Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies,
the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within
the Department of Defense (hereafter referred to collectively as the
``DoD Components''). The term ``Military Services,'' as used herein,
refers to the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps.
Sec. 240.3 Definitions.
The following terms apply to this part:
Center of Academic Excellence (CAE). A collective term that refers
to both a National Center of Academic Excellence in Information
Assurance Education (CAE/IAE) and a National Center of Academic
Excellence in Information Assurance Research (CAE-R).
CAE/IAE. A National CAE/IAE is an institution of higher education
which has met established criteria for Information Assurance Education
and has been jointly designated by the Department of Homeland Security
and the National Security Agency (NSA) as a CAE/IAE.
CAE-R. A National CAE-R is an institution of higher education which
has met established criteria for Information Assurance Research and has
been jointly designated by the Department of Homeland Security and the
NSA as a CAE-R.
DoD IASP Executive Administrator. The NSA functions as the
Executive Administrator for the IASP and is charged with the day-to-day
administration of the program.
IASP Partner University. A National CAE which has joined in
academic partnership with the Information Resources Management College
(IRMC) of the National Defense University to award masters' and/or
doctoral degrees through DoD's IASP.
Information Assurance (IA). For the purpose of this part, the term
``IA'' includes computer security, network security and other relevant
IT related to information assurance pursuant to Section 2200 of title
10, United States Code.
Information Technology (IT). For the purpose of this part, the term
``IT'' refers to any equipment or interconnected system or subsystem of
equipment that is used in the automatic acquisition, storage,
manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching,
interchange, transmission, or reception of data or information. ``IT''
includes computers, ancillary equipment, software, firmware, and
similar procedures, services (including support services), and related
resources.
Institution of Higher Education. For the purpose of this part, an
``institution of higher education'' refers to an educational
institution in any State that:
(1) Admits as regular students only individuals who possess a
certificate of graduation from a school providing secondary education,
or the recognized equivalent of such a certificate;
(2) Is legally authorized to provide a program of education beyond
secondary education;
(3) Provides an educational program that awards bachelor's degrees,
or provides no less than a 2-year program that is acceptable for full
credit toward a degree;
(4) Is a public or other nonprofit institution; and
(5) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an institution that has been
granted preaccreditation status by such an agency or association that
has been recognized by the Secretary for the granting of
preaccreditation status, and the Secretary has determined that there is
satisfactory assurance that the institution will meet the accreditation
standards of such an agency or association within a reasonable time.
Principal Investigator. Principal Investigators are the primary
points of contact at each National CAE/IAE. They are responsible for
publicizing the IASP to potential recruitment students and working with
students during the application process. Principal Investigators also
serve as the primary contact for recruitment students and retention
students who have transferred from the IRMC to a Partner University.
Recruitment Students or Recruitment Program. Applies to the portion
of the IASP available to qualified non-DoD students currently enrolled
at a designated National CAE.
Retention Students or Retention Program. Applies to the portion of
the IASP available to full-time, active duty Military Services
personnel and civilian employees of the DoD Components.
Sec. 240.4 Policy.
It is DoD policy that:
(a) The Department of Defense shall recruit, develop, and retain a
highly skilled cadre of professionals to support the critical IA and
information technology (IT) management, technical, digital and
multimedia forensics, cyber investigation, and infrastructure
protection functions required for a secure network-centric environment.
(b) The IASP shall be used to attract new entrants to the DoD IA
workforce and to retain current IA/IT personnel necessary to support
the DoD's diverse warfighting, business, intelligence, and enterprise
information infrastructure requirements.
(c) Information Assurance disciplines for the scholarship program
include, but are not limited to: biometrics, business management or
administration, computer crime investigations, computer engineering,
computer programming, computer science, computer systems analysis,
cyber operations, database administration, data management, digital and
multimedia forensics, electrical engineering, electronics engineering,
information security (assurance), mathematics, network management,
software engineering, and other similar disciplines as approved by the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks and Information Integration)/
DoD Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/DoD CIO). All academic
disciplines shall include a concentration in IA.
(d) Subject to availability of funds, the Department of Defense may
provide grants to institutions of higher learning for faculty,
curriculum, and infrastructure development and academic research to
support the DoD's IA critical areas of interest.
Sec. 240.5 Responsibilities.
(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense (Networks and Information
Integration)/Department of Defense Chief Information Officer (ASD(NII)/
DoD CIO) shall:
(1) Establish overall policy and guidance to conduct and administer
the DoD IASP pursuant to Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum,
``Delegation of Authority and Assignment of Responsibility under
Section 922 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2001,'' October 30, 2000.
(2) Develop annual budget recommendation to administer the DoD IASP
and provide academic scholarships and grants.
(3) Oversee program administration and execution by the Director,
NSA.
(4) Establish and chair the DoD IASP Steering Committee to oversee
key program actions, which include:
(i) Student eligibility criteria.
[[Page 9145]]
(ii) Grant and capacity building selection criteria for awards to
CAEs.
(iii) Final approval for the allocation of individual IASP
scholarships and grants.
(iv) Communications and marketing plans.
(v) IASP metrics and analysis of performance results, including
student and CAE/IAE feedback.
(b) The Director, NSA, shall:
(1) Serve as the DoD IASP Executive Administrator to:
(i) Implement the IASP and publish in writing all of the criteria,
procedures and standards required for program implementation to
encourage the recruitment and retention of personnel who have critical
IA and IT skills. Responsibilities include:
(A) Implementing the scholarship application and selection
procedures for recruitment and retention students.
(B) Establishing procedures for recruiting students to meet service
obligations through employment with a DoD Component upon graduation
from their academic program.
(C) Ensuring that all students' academic eligibility is maintained,
service obligations are completed, and that reimbursement obligations
for program disenrollment are fulfilled.
(D) Establishing procedures for National CAE/IAEs and employing DoD
Components to report on students' progress.
(E) Maintaining appropriate accounting for all IASP funding
disbursements.
(ii) Make grants, subject to availability of funds, on behalf of
the DoD CIO to institutions of higher education to support the
establishment, improvement, and administration of IA education programs
pursuant to Sections 2200 and 7045 of title 10, United States Code.
(A) Develop and implement the annual solicitation for proposals for
IASP grants.
(B) Coordinate the review process for grant proposals.
(C) Distribute grant funding and maintain appropriate accounting.
(D) Establish annual reporting procedures for grant recipients to
detail the results from their grant implementation.
(2) Provide representation to the DoD IASP Steering Committee and
provide briefings and reports, as required, to effect proper oversight
by the DoD CIO and the IASP Steering Committee.
(3) Maintain databases to support the analysis of IASP performance
results.
(c) The Information Resources Management College (IRMC) of the
National Defense University, under the authority, direction and control
of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall:
(1) Establish IASP Partner University agreements with National CAE/
IAEs to provide master's and doctoral degree opportunities to current,
former, and future students enrolled at the IRMC, who are awarded
retention scholarships.
(2) Maintain records of IASP student enrollments and graduates, and
provide data to the DoD IASP Executive Administrator.
(3) Serve as the liaison between IRMC retention students, their
follow-on IASP Partner University, and the DoD IASP Executive
Administrator.
(4) Provide academic representation to the DoD IASP Steering
Committee and provide briefings and reports as required on the IASP
retention program.
(d) The Heads of the DoD Components shall:
(1) Determine the requirement for IASP usage as a vehicle to
recruit and retain IA personnel to their organization.
(2) Identify the Office of Primary Responsibility for administering
the IASP within the DoD Component.
(3) Establish DoD Component-specific nomination, selection, and
post-academic assignment criteria for IASP retention students.
(i) Nominated personnel shall be high performing employees who are
rated at the higher levels of the applicable performance appraisal
system and demonstrate sustained quality performance with the potential
for increased responsibilities. All individuals must be U.S. citizens
and be able to obtain a security clearance.
(ii) Nominations must fulfill specific personnel development
requirements for both the individual nominee and the nominating
organization.
(iii) Salaries of retention scholarship recipients shall be paid by
the nominating DoD Component. When deemed necessary, DoD Components are
responsible for personnel backfill while recipients are in school.
(iv) Payback assignments of graduated students shall provide
relevant, follow-on utilization of academic credentials in accordance
with DoD Component mission requirements.
(v) Retention students shall fulfill post-academic service
obligations pursuant to Sections 2200 and 7045 of title 10, United
States Code. Members of the Military Services shall serve on active
duty while fulfilling designated DoD Component service obligations. DoD
civilian employees shall sign a continued service agreement that
complies with section 2200 of title 10, United States Code, prior to
commencement of their education, to continue service within the
Department of Defense upon conclusion of their education, for a period
equal to three times the length of the education period. The period of
obligated service is in addition to any other period for which the
recipient is obligated to serve on active duty or in the civil service,
as the case may be. Individuals who fail to complete the degree program
satisfactorily, or to fulfill the service commitment, shall be required
repay program costs, where applicable. Head of Components are
responsible to ensure enforcement of these agreements.
(4) Determine annual billet requirements for recruitment students
(the number of non-DoD IASP scholars who can be placed in full-time
employment positions with the DoD Component upon graduation). Specific
responsibilities for DoD Components who identify billet requirements
for recruitment students include:
(i) Assessing DoD Component skill requirements to determine skill
gaps and providing the annual recruitment student requirement to the
DoD IASP Executive Administrator.
(ii) Participating in the selection process for recruitment
students.
(iii) Coordinating and processing security clearances for selected
recruitment scholarship recipients.
(iv) Allocating billets for an internship period (if applicable).
(v) Assigning mentors to recruitment students.
(vi) Determining post-academic billet assignments for recruitment
students prior to the end of the students' academic program.
(5) Participate in the evaluation processes to assess and recommend
improvements to the IASP.
Sec. 240.6 Retention program.
(a) The IASP retention program is open to qualified DoD civilian
employees and members of the Military Services. Military officers and
DoD civilian employees may apply for a master's or doctoral degree
program; enlisted personnel may apply for a master's program.
(b) There are three DoD academic institutions participating in the
IASP: the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) at Wright-Patterson
Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio; the Information Resources Management
College (IRMC) of the National Defense University at Fort McNair in
Washington, DC in conjunction with over 25 Partner Universities; and
the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) in Monterey, California. Students
at AFIT and NPS attend full-time programs. IRMC participants may
[[Page 9146]]
attend the IRMC component of the IASP either full or part-time and
select a follow-on IASP Partner University through which they complete
their degree requirements either full or part-time. There are no part-
time doctoral programs. All candidates must meet the eligibility
requirements for their selected program, which are outlined in IASP
Academic Programs for Retention Students.
(1) Military officers and DoD civilian employees may apply to
attend any one of the three DoD academic institutions.
(2) Enlisted personnel may attend AFIT or the NPS, which is
authorized to enroll enlisted IASP participants pursuant to Sections
2200 and 7045 of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Students must select a degree program in one of the academic
disciplines listed in Sec. 240.4(c).
(d) Scholarship funding for the AFIT, the IRMC, and the IASP
Partner Universities, and the NPS includes tuition costs, selected
fees, books, and pre-approved, limited temporary duty (TDY) costs.
Other TDY and/or permanent change of station costs must be paid by the
nominating DoD Component. Retention students will continue to receive
their military pay or civilian salary from their DoD Component
throughout their course of study.
(e) DoD Component nominations are due by January 31st each year.
The student nomination process is outlined in IASP Nomination Process
for Retention Students.
(f) IASP participants are obligated to remain in good standing in
their degree programs, to continue in service as civilian employees or
members of the Military Services, and where applicable, to repay
program costs for failure to complete the degree program
satisfactorily, or to fulfill the service commitment pursuant to
Sections 2200 and 7045 of title 10, DoD policy, and the policies of the
respective DoD Component.
(g) Members of the Military Services shall meet DoD Component
service obligations. DoD civilian employees shall sign a continued
service agreement that complies with Reference (a), prior to
commencement of their education to continue in service with the
Department of Defense upon conclusion of their education, for a period
equal to three times the length of the education period.
Sec. 240.7 Recruitment program.
(a) Annually, in November, NSA (the DoD IASP Executive
Administrator) announces a solicitation for proposal from non-DoD
National CAE/IAEs interested in participating in DoD's IASP. Graduate
students and rising junior or senior undergraduates accepted at or
enrolled in one of the non-DoD institutions designated as CAE/IAEs
apply for full scholarships to complete a bachelor's, master's, or a
doctoral degree, or graduate (post-baccalaureate) certificate program
in one of the relevant disciplines defined in Sec. 240.4(c). Student
application requirements are included in the solicitation proposal
released by NSA.
(b) DoD Component recruitment student requirements are due to the
DoD IASP Executive Administrator each year by January 31st.
(c) The student selection process occurs annually in April. The
selection process is outlined in IASP Nomination Process for
Recruitment Students.
(d) Recruitment students are provided scholarships, covering the
full cost of tuition and selected books and fees. Students are also
provided a stipend to cover room and board expenses.
(e) Recruitment students may be required to complete a student
internship, depending on the length of their individual scholarship.
DoD Components typically use the authority granted in 5 CFR
213.3102(r), to arrange the internship.
(f) All recruitment students incur a service commitment which
commences after the award of the IASP authorized degree on a date to be
determined by the relevant DoD Component. The obligated service in DoD
shall be as a civilian employee of the Department or as an active duty
enlisted member or officer in one of the Military Services.
(1) Individuals selecting employment in the civil service shall
incur a service obligation of one year of service to the Department
upon graduation for each year or partial year of scholarship they
receive, in addition to an internship, if applicable.
(2) Individuals enlisting or accepting a commission to serve on
active duty in one of the Military Services shall incur a service
obligation of a minimum of 4 years on active duty in that Service upon
graduation. The Military Services may establish a service obligation
longer than 4 years, depending on the occupational specialty and type
of enlistment or commissioning program selected.
(g) Individuals who fail to complete the degree program
satisfactorily or to fulfill the service commitment upon graduation
shall be required to reimburse the United States, in whole or in part,
the cost of the financial (scholarship) assistance provided to them.
Dated: February 22, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-3993 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P